Some people think that government should send fresh doctors and teachers to rural areas for sometime before working in cities, while others think freedom of choice should be entertained!
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Many regional areas across the world face a dearth of appropriately equipped schools and hospitals, which presents a steep challenge to the ruralites. To overcome this problem, many are persuaded to propose making it mandatory for the freshly graduated teaching and health professionals to serve in rural areas before working in cities, but there are voices of dissent too.
The acute shortage of quality educational and medical facilities has prompted many to suggest that the freshly graduated health and teaching professionals should compulsorily serve in villages before engaging professionally in cities. However, others contest this and assert that this should be the prerogative of the concerned individuals.
Many vehemently rally behind the idea of stipulating working in regional areas for these professionals, for sometime. This view is primarily based on the virtue of giving back something to society in the lieu of the support offered by it, in the form of subsidized education. Most curriculum in such study programs is publicly funded using the money raised from taxes, otherwise pursuing such courses will be difficult for a majority of students. This makes it ethically valid for these professionals to reciprocate in a similar manner.
Moreover, such an arrangement will eventually benefit young doctors and teachers who will not only gain an expansive exposure of working with diverse communities in difficult conditions but also become familiar with the challenges facing villagers. This will help them develop empathy towards the affected people and encourage them to discover solutions.
Nevertheless, the other lobby feels working out of cities or towns should be a chosen option rather than an imposed one. Enforcing such a condition for professionals in medicine and teaching is no less than a bias. When those in other occupations enjoy all the liberty to engage wherever they want, it seems quite unwarranted to coax these professionals to work in specific areas.
Overall, after assessing both the viewpoints I feel this is an ideal proposal to surmount the gap in educational and health care facilities in villages, but the state should ensure that such assignments remain financially lucrative, and enriching for such practitioners.
