In some countries, at secondary at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15?

 In some countries, at secondary at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15? 

Nowadays, educational systems in many countries entail segregation of high school learners into two or three streams. This practice has been hailed as beneficial by many, but it will be too naive to overlook its pitfalls. 

Such an arrangement is laden with a prominent benefit. It  allows pupils to invest  their energy into learning a limited number of subjects- where they have their inclination, which can save their invaluable time and efforts that they otherwise are forced to allocate to other subjects having little relevance for their future academic and professional pursuits. This can aid them tremendously in gaining proficiency in their area of study, elevating their confidence and self-esteem, and preparing them for the occupation they may likely choose as professions. 

Furthermore, society will be the direct beneficiary of this since the learners graduating in specific streams from formal tuition will be in a better position to chart their future path prudently and quickly, and enroll themselves into higher courses that would lead them into gaining various trade specific skills, making available specialists in disparate professions crucial to development of country.

However, this system is not devoid of shortcomings. It  clearly defeats the primary objective of education, creating a society of equals, and instead it predisposes future generations to a permanent wedge between those who grow up to be too robotic - those studying subjects connected to science, and those who turn into impractical adults, who choose arts, or money-minded, those choosing commerce; thus, it might result creating a society of incompatibles. 

Overall, despite such an approach carrying both pros and cons, it seems to be the answer to the future requirements of society, which will be in the need of skills in diverse areas, and streaming would speed up the generation of such expertise. 

In some countries, at secondary or at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this bifurcation of students into streams at the age of 15?

In some countries, at secondary or  at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this bifurcation of students into streams at the age of 15?

 

Ielts Essay - Streaming the Students 

Bifurcating students into three different streams after completion of a certain form in the school, preferably at the secondary level of schooling when pupils attain age of fifteen,   is a common practice across many countries. Education experts cite various benefits of such a move though its drawbacks should never be ignored.

Allocating students to different streams is supposed to be having numerous benefits. By the time, children attain the age of 15, they become rational enough to make a choice of their future course of action, and if they are steered into a specific direction, they can capitalize on the opportunities laid at their disposal. Taking up and staying focused on specific subjects helps them to harness their potential and realize their talent without wasting their time on unnecessary frills and subjects.

However, streaming pupils has been under a constant fire for all justifiable reasons. Dividing students as per certain criteria, which is nothing more than a mechanical system, can never deliver true results. This bifurcation can prove to be counterproductive instead, as students can be permanently locked into incompatible educational domains; and get caught in the vicious circle of low scores,  before they actually wake up to the reality of appreciating their real strengths.

Moreover, this can fuel disparity and inequality among the students since there is a good chance that pupils studying in certain streams, like science, commerce, etc. may consider themselves to be more intelligent and avoid interaction with students of other streams. Furthermore, this division can deny students an enriching experience which they may get in mixed ability classrooms.

Hence, I feel that classifying students into streams as per abilities is not right and has the potential of pushing the growing minds into incompatible professions. 

In some countries, at secondary at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15?

In some countries, at secondary at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15?

 

Ielts Essay - Streaming Students 

Nowadays, higher education entails streaming students into academic or vocational subjects. Despite being questioned for its validity and effectivity in the current context, this strategy has been continued since several reasons can be cited in support this format of formal tuition at high or secondary level.  

The policy of streaming the pupils, at the age of 15, into vocational or academic area of studies, as per their abilities and inclinations carries multiple advantages. This helps the growing minds to clearly set their objectives and pursue them dedicatedly. As they have fewer subjects to explore and study, the pupils can focus on those completely. This does not only save them time but also protects them from extra burden they might have to bear while studying subjects of little consequence to the knowhow of domains the pupils are pursuing.

On the top of that, strategy of grouping students pursuing similar subjects offers certain inbuilt advantages. Like minded pupils pursuing homogenous syllabus tend to learn faster, and the class work progresses at a fairly brisk pace. Besides this, the young learners can also gauge their accomplishments in contrast to their classmates clearly and concretely, this often results in a healthy competition which ultimately is interpreted into excellent academic results.

Furthermore, this system can prove to be highly advantageous for the society too: the economy of a country can quickly harness the talents of young professionals and academicians, in form of their contributions to the economic productivity. These professionals, in their own domains, can bring around other benefits too, e.g. these professionals do not only save money, otherwise spent on training them, but also train others.

To conclude, I feel that pushing students into specific domain study at a young age can prove to be highly counterproductive. 

In some countries, at secondary at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15? - Ielts Essay

In some countries, at secondary at high school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15?

Allocating students to diverse streams of studies is a common practice almost all across the globe. This, as per certain experts, has numerous benefits for the individual pupils and the society, but even so it would be quite reckless to ignore the drawbacks of such a move.

Bifurcation of students into different domains of studies can be highly beneficial in many aspects. Division of study domains is generally based on inclination and abilities of the pupils. This system does not only enable students to focus completely on domains – they may want to pursue, and save a lot of time but also realize their potential, and be entrenched with comprehensive knowhow of the professional realm, by the time they graduate from their studies.  

Furthermore, this system can prove to be highly advantageous for the society too: the economy of a country can quickly harness the talents of young professionals and academicians, in form of their contributions to the economic productivity. These professionals, in their own domains, can bring around other benefits too, e.g. these professionals do not only save money, otherwise spent on training them, but also train others.

However, there are disadvantages galore in this system. Studying only in specific streams and circumventing others can make youngsters either too mechanical, or impractical. Drawing groups at young age when pupils are immature, often results in them being locked forever in incompatible occupations. For instance, for students waking up to their potential at a later age more often find themselves already molded for a profession that fails to address their aspirations. This can have disastrous effects on their future lives.

To conclude, I feel that pushing students into specific domain study at a young age can prove to be highly counterproductive. It is suggested that even while following this policy, learners should be exposed to other areas too.