Nowadays newspapers publish information about private lives of individuals. Some people think the government should maintain certain control over the information that gets published, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least 250 words

Nowadays newspapers publish information about private lives of individuals. Some people think the government should maintain certain control over the information that gets published, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least 250 words

Media is a source for humongous information that also provides access to personal lives. Some commentators perceive this as infringement, and call for stern measures to regulate such forays, while others think differently.  

There is overwhelming support for free press, even if they sometimes encroach private spaces of celebrated individuals who have gained mileage due to colossal fan-following. It is thus, the privilege of those, idolizing such personalities, to know how the latter behave behind their veil of public persona. It has been often experienced that the philanthropic facade is used by some as a pretext to gain popularity, but behind the scenes they rarely have anything to do anything with altruism.

Such endeavors, informing about private persona of known figures like sport professionals, often impact the populace favorably, inspiring them to embrace the precedents of hard work invested by some and strive to attain pinnacle. A recent story that inspired many, for example, how a young girl, hailing from a destitute family, despite all hindrances of the gender-based stereotypes, continued to focus on her studies and became the first women to graduate from an Indian village, persuaded umpteen families to follow the suit.

However, such invasion is often derided, evooking a call for stringent control on what can be made public: it has detrimental implications on those whose personal lives become public overnight, creating unwarranted pressure and irrefutable reputational damage. Some also get negatively inspired by certain material being published establishing wrong precedents for the youth if their idols are engaged in socially unacceptable behavior.

Overall, news has a massive impact on public pysche,  and thus, it is pertinent for certain controls to be applied on the information being heralded, as personal lives of others can become a benchmark: both positively and negatively.

Nowadays newspapers publish information about private lives of individuals. Some people think the government should maintain certain control over the information that gets published, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least 250 words.

Nowadays newspapers publish information about private lives of individuals. Some people think the government should maintain certain control over the information that gets published, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least 250 words. 

 

Ielts Essay Press Freedom  Of late newspapers have been making private lives of people public. This has prompted certain sections to propose a strict control on what can be disclosed to audience and what not even though there are some who believe that such a move by the government is unnecessary. 

Those vouching for censuring the content revealing intricate personal lives, feel that press and newspapers have no right to encroach the private space of people even if they are celebrities and noted public figures. Every individual enjoys this fundamental right and anybody trespassing this privilege should be inhibited. Governments being the controlling bodies should guarantee this right to every citizen, regardless of their status in the society.  

Moreover, paparazzi  has been a cause a distress and extreme consequences in  certain cases. Their hot pursuit of people, in order to extract details about their private lives, has ruined many. People attribute family disputes, legal separations, and even bereavement to these investigative journalists. This can be illustrated by the death of Princess Diana in a car mishap that was an outcome of a press photographer chasing her and her friend.

Having said that, a lobby  vehemently defends the rights of reporters and citizens to know, and make the private lives of individuals public, especially of celebrated personalities and politicians. These key public figures, through their actions, influence their followers, critics other common people profoundly, negatively or positively. With the reporters bringing forth information  about how noted individuals behave and deal with situations behind the veil of privacy, can either inspire or caution others.

To conclude, I personally feel, despite the fact that freedom should be rendered to press to peek into private lives, certain limits should be defined, and caution must exercised on what can be brought forth.