When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss both views and include your own opinion.

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss both views and include your own opinion. 

Many opine that exploring what one,or their ancestors did in gone by days, is worthless and one should look towards the future, but there are voices of dissent, nonetheless, suggesting that this might be impractical action, and have unfavourable effects.

Many opine that ignoring the family past deprives one of several benefits. Such a practice gives an opportunity to discover the values and culture of family of concerned individuals, a miss. This could be very helpful, especially, during hiring workers, or looking for a suitable matrimonial match. A well-rooted and cultured person will prove to be an asset but not exploring the background might result in selection of a wrong person which can impair the new relationships in making. 

In addition to above, information of family background is very incumbent for learning about the genetics and heredity of an individual. This data can be very useful for medical practitioners, and researchers, for treatment, or developing remedies for lethal diseases and ailments. Nevertheless, forgoing the exhaustive investigation of family history, will make it impossible to pinpoint the source, and intensity of  afflictions, and recommend suitable medical intervention.   

Having said that, others are skeptical of this view, fear that it can have unfavorable consequences. The information extracted might be misleading; it cannot be guaranteed that the process for gathering inputs was reliable and unbiased; thus, casting a shadow on  the legitimacy of facts. On top of that,  revelations of gone by days might prove to be a traumatic experience for many, causing psychological setbacks, propelling people towards depression and anxiety. 

In hindsight, despite there being certain pitfallls attributed to this proposition, I opine that change is inevitable and it must be embraced gracefully without prejudice; therefore, it is practical to overlook the need to delve into the backgrounds.  

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion.

 

Many opine that exploring past evidence is worthless and one should look towards the future, but, there are voices of dissent, nonetheless, suggesting that this might be impractical action and have unfavorable effects.

Many feel that ignoring the family past deprives one of several benefits. Such a practice gives an opportunity to discover the values and culture of family of concerned individuals, a miss. This could be very helpful, especially, during hiring workers, or looking for a suitable matrimonial match. A well rooted and cultured person will prove to be an asset but not exploring the background might result in selection of a wrong person which can impair the new relationships in making. 

Moreover, information of family background is very incumbent for learning about the genetics and heredity of an individual. This data can be very useful for medical practitioners and researchers for treating or developing cure for dangerous diseases and ailments. But, if one forgoes the exhaustive investigation of family history, it will be impossible to pinpoint the source and intensity of ailment and recommend suitable medical intervention.   

Nonetheless, there are others who are for this view, feeling that it can have unfavorable consequences. The information extracted may be misleading as it cannot be guaranteed that the process by which the inputs were gathered, was reliable and unbiased; thus, casting a shadow on legitimacy of facts. Furthermore, revelation of past information can prove to be a traumatic experience for many, causing psychological setbacks, propelling people towards depression and anxiety. 

Overall, despite there being certain disadvantages attributed to this proposition, I opine that change is inevitable and it must be embraced gracefully without prejudice; therefore, it is practical to overlook the need to delve into the backgrounds

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion. - Ielts Essay Model Answer 2

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion.

Ielts Essay - Family History 

 

 

 

Modern approach of investigating family history entails overlooking the past. Even though some cite practical reasons for following this strategy, there are certain shortcomings that cannot be discounted.

Ignoring analysis of past events to ascertain family history would make this exercise futile, resulting in faulty inferences. A peek into by-gone eras, families have survived through, to reveal facts about individuals is considered holistic: it accounts for origins, migration patterns and lifestyles evolving through eons. Whatever one does today, is greatly influenced by the nature of activities undertaken up their ancestors: one may be doing anything in the current scenario, their attitude towards working and responding to situations; performing certain activities; discovering solutions; and implementing strategies are directly influenced by the genetic inheritance, and forgoing it is likely to afford erroneous outcomes. 

Moreover, this may severely jeopardize health, specifically when it comes assessing inherited diseases, preventing adoption of adequate safegaurds. Evaluation of past events, often involving genetic risk assessment, aids in determining risks resulting from certain ailments: diabetes, cardiac ailments, and so on, and psychological disorders that can affect upcoming generations, helping ascertain risks and embrace necessary precautions to ensure wellness in future.  

However, the new method can help save time and resources: several modern theorists firmly find is little use squandering time and money in assessing the past mistakes in the current scenario when the surroundings and lifestyles have undergone significant transformation: education, technology and new order of society, have diluted social differences and evaporated class distinctions, heralding a new era where current circumstance and future aspirations are deemed more essential.  

Overall, I feel, disregarding family is prone to more drawbacks than benefits as it can cause inaccurate assessments about approaches and health, resulting in severe ramifications for individuals and those around them.

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion. - Ielts Essay MOdel Answer 1

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion.

 

Ielts Essay Family Heritage 

Evaluation of family history is an extremely broad subject, and disparate approaches are deployed to attain this task even though more recently those involved in such endeavors overlook the past events and emphasize on the future. This method may be successful even though it has its own drawbacks. 

Abstaining from looking at the past is assumed to bring time and money savings: humanity has made significant progress, and transformation, over the last century in almost every walk of life, including a significant switchover even in the case of the traditional occupations, making the history earlier than the start of 20^th century quite irrelevant. Moreover, the influence of consumerist attitudes persuades shunning gaining knowledge of lifestyles of ancestors, and instead focus on what future presents.

Nevertheless, ignoring past cause serious complications by circumventing a chance to learn from past mistakes: nothing can be clearly ascertained about a family and its members. Genetic inheritance; family based values and traditions being followed; and upbringing of individuals in a family, play a paramount role in shaping the personality and thus the future of a person.

Additionally, this could have severe implications for health, in case the investigations involve establishing the extent of risks facing individuals having a track-record in families of carrying hereditary ailments: diabetes, heart ailments, strokes, and so on, to aid in deciding the nature of safeguards that need to be embraced to delay, if not completely eradicate, the probability of occurrence, and affording relief to those susceptible to some diseases.

Overall, I feel that disregarding the bygone era of families to know about their evolution, despite fetching time and money savings, has the potential of precipitating unwarranted and inaccurate outcomes, preventing deriving accurate assessment. Thus, this practice should surely include examining the gone by days.