“Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer?

“Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer? 

It is often argued that the inability to accomplish goals is a reflection of lack of strong resolve. I strongly disagree with this notion, as success is influenced by several factors beyond desires. 

The majority of people tend to equate setbacks with the amount of effort a person puts into a particular pursuit. There is a common belief that if  one is resolute to attain something, they will rarely fail. For instance, it has often been observed in schools and at the workplace, a successful person is always perceived as being the one obsessed with goals, and is prepared to go an extra mile to overcome objectives, but the ones, despite investing equal efforts, fail to achieve positive outcomes due to lack of drive. Such pre-set notions, even if misplaced,  reinforce the belief that those failing, are lagging the determination to win. 

However, although the former view might hold some substance,  it is not valid in most cases;  there are several factors which influence the outcomes: triumph or loss. In reality, desires might be one aspect influencing accomplishments, but largely circumstances play a determinant role. It has often been  observed that many worthy of success struggle to find it because of absence of resources, timing, financial constraints and various other similar obstacles which contribute towards one being able to realize their ambition, or falling short of goals.  

In conclusion, I believe that there are several factors which decide success, or lack of it,  apart from the yearning to lodge victory. There can be numerous aspects that underpin the outcomes of endeavors, and thus, it is unfair to state that lack of desire causes one to miss the rewards of efforts: the success. 

Moreover, sometimes in a highly competitive world, failure can be attributed to luck. For example, many students preparing for competitive exams such as UPSC face a lot of rejection before they meet success simply because the questions they encounter might not be within their means to respond to perfectly, but at others they easily solve the problems presented in the question papers.  

"Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer?

 "Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer?

It is a fact that lack of resolve leads to debacles. 

Yes? 

• Those who are unwilling or lack perseverance are rarely able to invest their whole-hearted efforts. Those who are determined attempt to try alternative strategies to attain their goals 

• Those driven by a yearning for success try to obtain all skills and resources that can lead them to triumph   

No? 

• It is not just the craving for pinnacle that helps one attain their goals, but the timings of the action matter a lot. 

• It is also the preparedness and skills that chart the course to goals.  

• Being overconfident can also result in setbacks 

• The piousness of the objective that makes a difference between setback and victory 

Is lack of success truly an outcome of the absence of the sense of purpose, is a notion worthy of a critical analysis since it can be challenged on various grounds. 

It is generally assumed that missing goals is an outcome of weak desire, wherein one tends to invest half-hearted efforts, is prepared to abandon their endeavors midway on discovering that things are not going as per their desire, and mandate extra efforts, but still do not guarantee the realization of objectives. This can be corroborated by citing the examples of a few students who despite harboring dreams to enroll in the elite universities, are unable to do so in reality since they are unprepared to burn midnight oil. 

Nevertheless, although the former view may hold some substance, it is not ubiquitously valid; there are other underlying factors that can make a difference between an intention to pursue an ambition and accomplishing it: availability of resources has a major impact on the outcomes as lack of these can make efforts useless. For instance, almost every society boasts of the presence of highly skilled and talented individuals, nonetheless only those born in wealthy nations can make it to the pinnacle.

Similarly, the timing of actions have a great relevance since if moves are miscalculated or mistimed, even the best in their domains can fall short of their desired targets. To exemplify, even the best players like Ronaldo can put up a disappointing show and waste opportunities to score goals if their shots are ill-timed.  

In hindsight, the dearth of resolve can make its impact felt in certain cases, but it is hard to overlook the significance of having necessary ingredients like presence of appropriate mediums, and meticulous synchronization of moments and actions, which can lead to attainments. 

"Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer?

"Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer?

Desire,Success and Failure

Accomplishment and flops have been defined as basic parameters of human life. Where the former is considered a crtical indicator of dedication and persevarence, the latter is often attribited to missing resolve. Thus, it remains a million dollar question, whether this perception holds substance,  or not.  

The school of thought specifically feels that success is propelled by obsession and a strong vision. Those seeking accomplishment must have a deep passion to strive for reach objectives, and  tend to invest best of their efforts in each phase of their endeavor, and go to any limit to ensure that the end result is as per the expectations, whereas paucity of resolve to continue under hardships and see the work through results in complacency which ultimately ends in disaster.

However, some present strong arguments to counter popular beliefs of links between setbacks and deficient  of resolve, and assert that missing achievements  cann hardly be regarded as an indicator of dearth of passion and ambition. Not being able to garner success is merely a coincidence, and failng is more or less linked to destiny, and sometimes other circumstances beyond the control of many.

On top of that, many experts feel that if the desire and ambition could guarantee success then people, like Napoleon and Hitler would never have failed, for both these men aspired to dominate the world. As per the experts, to succeed, one  needs to take correct and well-informed decisions, and timely actions, besides possessing an attitude to win.   

In conclusion, it can be said that desire, and lack of triumph are two different quantities altogether, so it cannot be said ones missing their goals face absence of resolve to attain something; there are factors underpinning achievement of goals.