New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss. - Ielts Essay

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss.

News editors enjoy absolute authority over what to include, or exclude from reporting: this mirrors several influencing aspects. However, are people becoming habitual of reports about fateful events, and will reports about optimistic happenings help, is a matter worthy of deep analysis. 

The elements that play a larger role in news selection process include deciding about the relevance of events and happenings to be reported. Today, news editors always select the information, which can be sensationalized, and attract more and more readers and viewers. The TRP ratings and readership are on top priority for the most, and they always wish to ensure that their visibility is exceptionally bolstered.

The inclination of mass media agencies has engendered a trend of gloomy reporting. Consequently, umpteen sections feel that they have developed an instaiable appetite for receiving unpleasant news from all walks of life. audience automatically gets inclined to receiving those snippets and reports about distressing incidents.

Having said that, some commentators feel that even after the growing affliation to reporting distressing happenings, public hardly seem to have developed a penchant to disturbing events. They have a good appetite for all kinds of reports, and as can be seen from the reviews registered on prominent media outlets such as CNN.

In conclusion, I feel, although majority of news being reported are distressing and some people would like to get a good input of pleasant happenings, news must be presented as it is and whether events in question are pleasant or distressing.

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss. II Ielts Essay

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss. 

Nowadays, news editors have started resorting to objectively selecting material to be presented, evoking a debate whether this phenomenon has contributed to a gloomy scenario, and should news about joyous events be given more emphasis.    

 Editors, while choosing news, generally consider certain aspects: professional aspirations and the monetary benefits, factors that come into play for the new agencies aspiring to create a niche for themselves by bolstering viewership and readership in the contemporary markets. Additionally, many are driven by favoritism and political affiliations, persuading them to become highly selective, and often biased.  

 The rapidly incrementing inclination of media houses towards reporting distressing news having capability of creating sensations, has led to engendering a bizarre phenomenon among the viewers and the readers, who have developed an insatiable appetite for knowing more and more about fateful events and happenings. Gaining knowledge about fateful happenings has become a staple requirement of keen news hunters. To surmount this, some advocate production and printing of news about pleasant happenings. An overdose of reports about disturbing incidents has resulted in creating unhappy sentiments. Thus, it is felt that reporting pleasant news would surely help reign back the dipping moods.

Having said that, those cynical of the former proposal suggest this is unlikely to help in alleviating hopelessness, and feel that the primary obligation of editors is to ensure reporting remains free of any lop-sided considerations, whether good or bad. Moreover, just prioritizing the amount of pleasant reporting would not wipe out disturbing incidents, but make people oblivious of hazards hovering around.

In hindsight, I feel commercial compulsions drive the decisions of including, or excluding items of reporting, and this has contributed to paranoid environment, yet news should be presented impartially and without taking their nature into account. 

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss.

 New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influencethese decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more goodnews was reported? Discuss.

Ielts Essay - News Editors and News 

With the information revolution proliferating, eminence of editors has gained prominence, as they are the ones, making decisions - several factors influence such moves - about, excluding and including reports. This propensity, as per many, fostered an craving for unpleasant news and it would appropriate to report pleasant events.

The underlying elements that decide the preference include ascertaining the relevance of happenings to be reported: the emphasis is always on short listing something that can be sensationalized, and attract more followers. The TRP ratings and readership are highly placed over other aspects; this can fetch rich yields in the form of monetary rewards and ensure enduring popularity.  

 

This proclivity has helped paranoia pervade through the length and breadth with the audience fostering an insatiable appetite for unpleasant news from all walks of life with the majority opening newspapers and switching TV sets for knowing about fateful happenings. To surmount this appalling, more reports about jovial events should be prioritized to help uplift dipping public sentiments.  

 

Having said that, the critics doubt the relevance of the former proposal and feel that this could do more harm than good by making people oblivious of the menace and perils that lingering around them, making them vulnerable to myriads of jeopardies such as robberies, epidemics, natural calamities, and so on.   It is felt by this school of thought that the enlightened readers and viewers are quite judicious in their approach and can differentiate between all kinds of reports.

In conclusion, I feel that, although majority of news being reported are distressing and some would like to get an input of pleasant happenings, news must be presented as it is and whether events in question are pleasant or distressing.