Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

Many governments provide financial assistance to people who have been  unemployed for a long time. Some people believe that these individuals should be required to do unpaid work in return, to contribute to society. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and explain why this idea has both benefits and potential problems and shall analyze the notion of the motion. 

On the one hand, asking long-term job-seekers to do voluntary work can help both the community and the jobless. For instance, local organisations such as schools, hospitals, or charities often need extra help but have limited budgets. Job-seekers could support them by doing simple tasks like cleaning, organising events, or helping the elderly. This benefits the community and gives unemployed people useful work experience. It may also boost their confidence, teach them new skills, and make them more employable in the future.

On the other hand, making voluntary work compulsory could have negative effects. By definition, voluntary work should be done by choice, not by force. If people are made to work in return for their benefits, they might feel that they are being punished. In addition, not all unemployed people are physically or mentally fit to work. Some may have personal or family problems, health issues, or other barriers that make it difficult for them to take part in such programmes. Forcing them could lead to more stress and frustration.

In conclusion, while encouraging long-term unemployed people to do community work can have many benefits, it should not be mandatory. Governments should offer these opportunities as a way to support and motivate people, but they must also consider individual circumstances before making such work a requirement.

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

 

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

Should the state persuade those people who have been jobless since a long time and have been receiving unemployment grants, to do some free services?  

 

If yes 

• These people would help the state save some money otherwise invested in hiring paid workforce. This way, these individuals would be doing something productive for society. 

• This would also enable the government  to convince tax-payers that their hard-earned money is not being squandered to help unproductive people. 

• Idle mind is the devil’s workshop:  This could also help the jobless themselves: they would stay away from depressing thoughts, or participating in illegal activities to overcome boredom. 

• *********These people could also strike a job in alternative fields when they work in those fields as volunteers.  

NO

• This could make them feel dejected and alienated, as they are not jobless because of their fault, but have been trying to get jobs. Working in those occupations may hurt their sentiments and take a toll on their self-esteem. 

• Others could also follow these precedents and may leave their jobs to work in voluntary services and earn unemployment benefits. This would be disastrous for the society and the economy 

Several countries extend long term grants to the jobless, but should the latter be engaged in community services to reciprocate for the social support, it is a matter that needs to be delved deeper into before arriving at a plausible conclusion. 

To begin with, involving the recipients of long-term unemployment benefits in unpaid services would enable them to pay back something to the society in the form of savings made in monetary terms. These individuals would replace the paid labor in various spheres and expertise; consequently, governments would be spared of paying salaries and other benefits. For instance, a similar policy has been implemented in various provinces of Australia, has created a win-win  situation for both, the benefactors and beneficiaries as local regimes can use the funds saved for such endeavors to support the unemployed.

Similarly, this could prove to be extremely favorable for those without a job: they could use their spare time to do something productive, instead of going astray and embracing illegal activities, or suffering mental affliction, like depression. Additionally, they could also foster skills, and network, in alternative trades, which could land them an employment.

Nevertheless, there is a darker side to this arrangement despite it remaining uncommon, for it might have  a knock-on effect by virtue of some following the precedents of their jobless counterparts, and embracing such settings. This could reduce the number of people engaged in active economic endeavors that generate value. However, these fears lack substance since few want to remain jobless: surviving on subsistence money is not a voluntary choice. 

In hindsight, although those with a job, and getting the state support, engaging in unpaid work is an individual prerogative, this scheme can prove to be exceedingly rewarding for the affected individuals and the society.      

Introduction 1

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the issue whether the jobless beneficiaries of government grants since long should engage in community services as a means to reciprocate for the social support, with some supporting this proposal, and others rejecting it. I feel this should be an individual prerogative and not a forced decision.

Introduction 2

Engaging the jobless beneficiaries of government grants since long in community services is a proposal that even though that seems to be the best way to reciprocate for social support, I feel this should be an individual prerogative and not a forced decision.

Introduction 3 

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community? - Ielts Essay

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

 

Ielts Essay - Volunteer Work for Employment Benefits 

Governments, in many countries that maintain a social security network, are mulling a policy to make the unemployed, receiving unemployment grants, to afford free community services. This concept has both takers and critics with their individual opinions to support their arguments.

Those advocating for this notion  propound that this would help convince tax payers that they are not being cheated by the state, and that their hard-earned money is not being channelized to support unproductive inhabitants. Moreover, this arrangement will aid recipients of unemployment privileges, in reciprocating for community support, enable poloicy makers in saving monetary resources otherwise spent on paying the salaries on those locations.

Likewise, this could also rule out any chance of complacency on account of those without a job, and not being able to find one, and, in turn, help in determining the alternative areas where gainful employment could be taken up. Furthermore, it may also help in keeping the unemployed away from taking up crime, as a way to spend free time.

Nevertheless, the concept is in for critical assessment, as it may affect unemployed psychologically.  Most of the times, it has been observed that people who lose, or have to quit, their jobs, is not due to their mistake, the prevalent economic conditions decide the fate of employment. Making them work for free may rob them of the self esteem – a professional working as voluntary is generally not a welcome idea.

To conclude, I feel voluntary work in lieu of unemployment grants is an appropriate response to social and commucial support. All the criticism can be easily overlooked in favor larger public interest; this, in fact, will assist such people too.