A majority feels that voting should be considered compulsory. Do you agree or disagree with this notion?

A majority feels that voting should be considered compulsory. Do you agree or disagree with this notion?

Compulsory voting has become a hot topic these days, and many feel that everyone needs to participate in the process, while others are skeptical about this notion.

To begin with, this arrangement can ensure participation by every citizen, overcoming the situation of minority voting. It has been seen by many that whenever these events happen, many times, the least favourable candidate automatically wins due to the low participation of the populace, by virtue of simple majority principle, due to which they create policies benefiting only the limited populace  and work as per their convenience. 

Similarly, the proposed method can provide the government a solution to check about the actual populace, giving upper hand to policy makers to manage their monetary resources efficiently. While running campaigns it require funds to carry out the task like advertising, printing posters, and so forth, by this approach they can be benefitted as they do not need to spend on these activities; they already got the information of habitants through previous process saving them huge capital which can be used in more prioritized work.

While others suggest, pressurising one to vote is a clear indication of violating personal choice of freedom. Many believe that voting is just a democratic process, one can still participate in this by submitting a blank reserving their personal choice if one does not want to cast a vote for another.

In hindsight, mandatory voting can lead the government to manage resources more efficiently; mandatory participation can lead to implementation of various policies which can be fruitful to citizens only as they can choose leaders by actively participating in the process.

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Elite countries should step forward and help developing countries by easing up their financial obligations. This proposal is beneficial and humane can help the world prosper faster. I agree with this idea and believe that such measures should be adopted to alleviate the misfortunes of poverty-stricken societies.

 

By taking monetary aid from the communities, poor countries, which are trapped in a vicious circle, will be able to stand on their feet once again. These nations can utilize this amount to ameliorate the life of their citizens by rendering efficient and advanced facilities. Moreover, with these funds, these countries will be able to improve the infrastructure and create numerous opportunities in almost every realm. With this perspective, reducing the financial liability will aid in the progress of the underdeveloped countries.

 

On top of that, this may also help in mitigating the global crisis caused by the exodus of people, of deprived societies, seeking shelter in rich countries as refugees to escape poverty in their homelands. Such movements impose an immense -pressure on the local economies of the elite nations, but the governments  seem  helpless due to absence of opportunities in economically weaker nations, who in turn  are cowed down by huge repayment burdens. If the loans extended were pardoned, the poor nations would be able to create better opportunities for their natives,  preventing the latter from seeking refuge in other parts of the world.   

 

To reiterate, I completely concur with this proposal since pardoning loans seems to be the only way in the current scenario, which can aid in upheaval of those living in deprivation in various parts of the world. This will have a long lasting impact on the global society. 

In order to mitigate the troubles and financial liabilities of indigent countries around the world, the international organisations should take effective and immediate initiatives for improving the standard of living of the population.  

Recently there are more gas stations being built as opposed to diesel ones in rural areas. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?

Recently there are more gas stations being built as opposed to diesel ones in rural areas. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?           

 

Ielts Essay - Gas Vs Diesel Station 

Of late, a new trend is being noticed: more and more filling-stations are selling gas instead of diesel in rural areas. This, as per many, is bound to be beneficial for rural areas, but this does not miss vehement public derision from those who consider this decision to be loaded with drawbacks. 

 

Prioritizing  sale of gas aims at dissuading rural inhabitants from using diesel – notorious for causing most air pollution and related hazards – and improving quality of air in the regional areas: the results of this switchover are already being reflected in the form the reduced sulphur, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide levels in the surroundings, making the air more  breathable  and healthier. There has  been a marked decline in incidence of respiratory disorders of severe multitude  among the ruralites. Moreover, the soil has been also spared of contaminants  which was, in the past, a big concern that was not only impacting the fertility of land but also contaminating water bodies, by virtue of chemicals entering these due to water run-off.

 

However, as the detractors suggest, this is bound to create chaos in village life: most equipment, used in various tasks and jobs, ranging from agriculture to household, run on this heavy fossil fuel. If the this fuel becomes hard to source, either most of the villagers will have to travel miles to buy, or, those cannot afford it, will have to give up their work. Even if, people shift their usage to gas, they would have to make heavy investments on buying equipment and tools that use gas; thus taxing rural economy.    

 Hence, I personally feel, although this decision carries both benefits and drawbacks, it is still quite a good decision, as health is of a paramount concern. Thus, such arrangement is a welcome change.  

 

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

 

Ielts essay - Should rich nations help poor nations 

The progress of any country is gauged on three scales; health, education and trade, and these areas are the ones, where the developing countries are found lacking necessary resources and critical expertise. This has encouraged some eminent economists to suggest that elite nations must assist the poor countries in getting over these hurdles.

The assistance rendered to the poorer countries by the rich nations would lead to an upheaval of poverty stricken people – living in sub-human conditions – of the developing and underdeveloped countries. The aid extended in form or money and expertise could play a pivotal role in the inducing massive improvements in currently non-existent health services, poor educational facilities and lack of employment opportunities. This would in turn help in reducing the disparity at the global level and truly nurture the spirit of brotherhood and harmony between various countries.

Furthermore, although some may consider indirect benefits as irrelevant, international assistance would surely help the world community in curbing certain crimes, like human trafficking and high seas piracy – these crimes generally originate from underdeveloped countries. The economic benefits accruing from such initiatives could be of a greater magnitude – both for rich and poor countries; as one hand, the inhabitants would be able to improve their professional and vocational skills, on the other, the developed world could reap advantages of accessing adequately educated and healthy workforce. 

However, this kind of international aid schemes have many a times proved futile and deepened the crisis further in many poor nations; as the funds granted for development are often channelized into wrong hands; and end up filling the coffers of corrupt politicians and opportunists.

To conclude, I feel that rich countries helping economically backward nations, is a practical solution for reducing the gap between the rich and the poor.

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Pressing Debts of Poor Countries 

In an era when bi lateral and multilateral cooperation is achieving new heights at the global level, many economists have started suggesting that to bring the international community more closer, rich nations should work in the direction of bringing down or writing off the debts altogether, whereas there are several who feel that this would be inappropriate.

 

It is firmly believed that the maladies, like hunger and poor living conditions, etc. being faced by humanity stem from lack of financial resources. The issue takes a monumental dimension when it comes to countries that face severe shortage of money. As per many established experts, although the countries in possession of abundant financial resources do actually put in serious efforts to help poor nations by extending aid and bridging loans, all the assistance goes in vain; as the poor nations are not able to bear the burden of paying back pending loans. The position of the poor countries is further worsened by existing poverty and low productivity.

Furthermore, the poor nations, which are already reeling under the burden of pending arrears further slide down, in terms of performance, on the economic, political and human resource front. These nations are trapped in a vicious circle; and the inhabitants of such nations are not able to reap any advantage from advancement and progress. This aspect severely hampers the prospects of even development on various fronts at the global level.

However, many experts claim that this reducing or writing off arrears would do more damage to nations stricken with poverty because such a move would make the political establishments of those countries complacent; make them dependent on such sops in future; and give rise to corruption, exacerbating the miseries of such regions. 

In conclusion, reducing or writing off debts might prove to be counterproductive for poor nations. Thus, such proposal should be enforced discreetly, after assessment of various essential aspects. 

In the Times of the tumultuous international situation, where the temperaments & Temperatures are riding close to the Boiling Point, international Level Sports Events like World cup soccer & Olympic Games act as the major catalysts in cooling down the Bi-lateral & the Multilateral Atmosphere. These Global Carnivals also help by providing the medium to vent the Patriotic feelings in a non-hazardous way. - IELTS TEST

In the Times of the tumultuous international situation, where the temperaments & Temperatures are riding close to the Boiling Point, . These Global Carnivals also help by providing the medium to vent the Patriotic feelings in a non-hazardous way.
Discuss and give your views with relevant examples from your own experience in not less than 250 words.  

In a tense global situation when any small issue can lead to a major crisis and altercation, some harbor the view that sporting happenings at global level, like Olympics etc., can do wonders and bring people from various countries together on one platform, where they can easily display their national affiliations without creating uneasy and uncomfortable situations. Some do, however, refute this claim. 

These sporting events can indeed make world look like a small global village, where one gets to observe the inhabitants from all continents. These are followers and supporters, following their teams and the contingents to host cities, where they mingle with hosts. This intermingling creates a conducive atmosphere, assisting disparate cultures in creating a prfound understanding.  

Besides this, these occasions create a panoramic miracle, where patriotic rhetoric and aspirations, cheer home-team members. This all happens in a very friendly environment. Arch enemies sometimes fight it out, not with military doctrine but with sporting effort, wherein cheering is countered with cheering, not war-cries; and the victory is enjoyed, while defeat is accepted decently.  

Moreover, nowaday,s it has been seen that also that fans canvas for their favorite sports personalities, on social networking sites. Their favorites may not be the members of their home teams. Often, one tends to forget limitations of political boundaries during such occasions and join in to support their favorites, thus intensifying the feeling of brother hood and buildng bonhomie. ********** 

To conclude, I personally feel, these kind of pan-continental sporting events are a boon for the human race, as they teach mankind to co-exist, and cultivate an in-depth message of brushing the tribal attitudes aside, and endorsing the concept of acceptance and homogeneity among the masses, all-over the world.  

********** these paragraphs can be exchanged to put a +,+,- view,Although, there have been instances when these occasions have turned the relationships sour and presented ugly scenes, which can sometimes catapult into major face-off among the fans. For e.g. when Indian cricket team lost the quarter-final match against the Sri-lanka, the match had to be abandoned, this was definitely a gloomy scenario.

Most countries develop their economies to improve living standards. Some people are afraid that it will cause degradation of important social values. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? - Ielts Essay

Most countries develop their economies to improve living standards. Some people are afraid that it will cause degradation of important social values. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 

Ielts Essay on Development and traditions

With a race ensuing for progress, every nation on the planet earth has been pursuing developmental objectives. This even though has created apprehensions about this pursuit casting unholy shadow on the culture and ways of life. There are pros and cons associated with progress, but progress has more vouching for it.

The dynamics of enhancement in the economic productivity generates fresh venues for a better and a healthy society that is more aware of its social structure, while those choosing to remain confined to age-old traditions and values often succumb because of rigid values. It has been historically established that countries having higher standard of living stand better chances of preserving their beliefs, and instead propagating, them across the world, as has been seen and experienced in case of USA.

Moreover, it is only the progress that can create resources for preservation of rituals and traditional thought process; all venues and corners of a developing economy witness a parallel and simultaneous upheaval. To corroborate, a country like Japan which is known for its age old traditions has developed and sustained its customs successfully, and today, more and more Japanese are inclined to their cultural thinking.

Having said that, despite fetching numerous rewards, the skepticals are often seen expressing fears – even though they are unfounded - their cultures being invaded and turned into irrelevant by the progress. They often cite instances of people, especially the young, getting detached from the indigenous customs and succumbing to lifestyles that are deemed unsuitable in specific social perspectives.

In conclusion, by engendering diverse mechanism to preserve traditional practices, the striving for prosperity certainly helps drive in more merits than pitfalls; thus, I would rather emphasize that development has enormous benefits that cannot be side-lined in the name of preserving traditions.