Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In modern times, many argue that hosting an international sports event in their country can be advantageous, but many refute the same by citing that it is more menacing than being beneficial. This essay will shed light on both the aspects and provide a justified conclusion.

To start with, many people believe that hosting an international sports event can be beneficial for their country as it will bring them significant attention and an opportunity to introduce their culture across the globe, their food, and indigenous traditions, which can result in fostering mutual respect among visitors and hosts, and support exchange of views. 

Moreover, hosting a mega sports event can bring numerous advantages to a country, such as, developing of new modern infrastructure, in terms of sports facilities and new hotels to accommodate the visitors, opening the way for world leading businesses to invest in the country, thereby creating employment and business opportunities.  In addition to this, this also brings huge tourism to the country, which assists them to motivate their local businesses and create a way for local people to work more in order to gain profit.

However, hosting such tournaments also has some ramifications such as, building new stadiums needs huge land banks for construction, often resulting in deforestation, and disturbing  nature. Similarly, big tourism brings more waste with them, causing pollution. For instance, in 2014,  Brazil hosted the FIFA World Cup, a blockbuster event that left empty stadiums with waste and high maintenance cost, which eventually is being borne by Brazilians.  

In hindsight, barring a few drawbacks, such international undertakings render more benefits, and thus, countries should host leading international sports events, in order to provide the best experience to their own people and  motivate them. 

Some people argue that governments should focus on domestic matters, while others believe that addressing global issues is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people argue that governments should focus on domestic matters, while others believe that addressing global issues is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There is a fierce demand echoing the power corridors to focus on internal affairs, while some stress the need to raise the stakes in and at international issues. This essay shall critically analyse both viewpoints and draw a justified conclusion.

To start with, it is often argued that the governments have a primary duty to address domestic issues: citizens expect economic stability, healthcare, education, and law and order from those elected to represent them. Since the overall well-being of the population can be severely affected when these basic needs are not met, many believe that policy makers should invest their energy into resolving internal issues before looking outward.

However, some believe that worldwide problems require urgent and collective action from policymakers, challenges; climate change, pandemic, terrorism, and international conflicts, and so forth; transcend national boundaries and can have widespread ramifications. For instance, the recent global health crisis followed by the COVID pandemic demonstrated that international cooperation is indispensable and long-term stability can only be ensured if nations support and collaborate with each other, making it imperative to render precedence of transnational issues.

Moreover, a strong focussed foreign policy is beneficial to the development of a country. Engagements with neighbours and other leaders strengthen global trade, diplomatic partnerships, intelligence sharing, all of which boost internal and external credibility and domestic stability. For instance, rising oil prices can profoundly impact the domestic environment, for it can lead to inflationary tendencies, which can only be controlled through bi-lateral and multilateral trade agreements that attempt maneuvering through the volatile fossil fuel market.  

In hindsight, although focusing on domestic matters is essential for national prosperity, lawmakers should also play a significant role in tackling global issues for both are intricately entwined, complementing each other in a highly globalised concurrent era.

Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation. Do you agree or disagree?

Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a general perception emerging among those believing that umpteen concerns of the world could be surmounted with help of international teamwork. I agree with this proposal, which shall be discussed in the following paragraphs.

To start with, a lobby strongly asserts that the challenges such as hunger, which is augmenting malnutrition index, especially among children, could be tackled if the developed countries donate, or sell the spare produce, to recipient societies. This will nip the evil in its bud; as a result, those famishing will have food on their platters. For example, every year Japan donates the harvest of corn with Thailand, in order to help undernourished juveniles.

Moreover, many feel that if nations open borders for tourism, it will render a plinth to progress, aiding economies by creating employment for millions and business worth billions. This is to say, when travelling for leisure is promoted, it will help create jobs in diverse economic sectors, sometimes, not even related to tourism; likewise, generate revenues for organizations engaged in disparate commercial domains and regimes of host countries, aiding in amassing monetary resources for daily and emergencies. 

Similarly, a group propounds that rich nations should share environmental research and its results. These findings will assist in overcoming several woes: deforestation, pollution, garbage disposal, and many more, not just at a local but at the global level. To corroborate, a recent finding on waste management by researchers in New Zealand, was shared with Asian countries, helping engender an elaborate framework for proper disposal of trash.

Hence, it can be safely asserted that with international joint efforts by: sharing information, food, and permitting leisure travel, will surely pave a way in discovering plausible mechanisms to enable the global community to negotiate numerous universal concerns.

The international community must take immediate action to ensure all countries reduce their usage of fossil fuels. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The international community must take immediate action to ensure all countries reduce their usage of fossil fuels. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

 

The great public discourse of the contemporary era is a time aligned with the issue of whether measures should be taken to minimise the consumption of non-renewable fuels. I press for an urgent international action to alleviate fossil fuel use

It has been seen that as the population is incrementing rapidly, engendering the need to expand activity in every economic sector to ensure fulfilling human needs, resulting in rec  in reckless milking of naturally occurring carbon-based propellants, ignoring repercussions: it is feared that if this is allowed to continue, the future generations might not have access to this premium natural resource, impeding their progress, and making their survival tenuous. As per several studies, the current consumption and exploitation patterns indicate the possibility of these materials becoming extinct within the next four to five decades. However, embracing these measures will act as a motivation for adoption of renewable resources like electricity.  

    

Moreover, the complications extend beyond resource depletion, the surging use of these materials is also becoming a menace for the environment as  the combustion of these substances lead to the release of various greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide and  monoxide,and so forth, exacerbating the pollutions levels and accelerating global warming, which if not contained, could turn the planet into inhospitable, owing to the unwarranted impact such as rising sea levels, unannounced droughts and floods, among others, of this climatic phenomenon, affecting every human activity, right from agriculture to sustaining friendly weather,  and also other forms of life. 

In hindsight, mitigating the use of fossil fuels is critical for sustaining economic activities in the future and also prevent the earth from turning hostile for humans and other creatures that co-habit it. Thus, it will be in the interest of mankind to act swiftly, and global action can help accelerate things.  

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

When impoverished countries are suffering due to lack of resources, many have started suggesting that the world should come together to pardon loans or mitigate the dues. I partially concur with this proposal and shall explain my stand in this essay.

Those supporting this idea propose this will allow destitute nations to invest the money saved into providing basic and advanced facilities to their citizens: food and shelter, healthcare, education, a healthy infrastructure that can create abundant employment opportunities. This will allow citizens of these countries lead a better and heathy lifestyle, where in they will have access to world class amenities and employment, and elite nations will be able to use the cheap labour, raw materials and facilities like transportation, allowing both the parties to draw benefits. 

On top of that, this will resolve several universal problems facing global society that of illegal migrations, global crime: high-seas piracy, drug trade, and so on, and diseases, especially the infectious ones like Ebola and Covid, that generally emanate from economically weaker regions, turning the world into a better place to live. 

However, some are skeptical of this policy and express their concerns that this is might prove to be counterproductive. The beneficiaries could become used to such relaxations and stop investing their efforts in developing themselves, and this might fan corruption, as has happened in some African and South Asian regions, wherein local regimes have abandoned creating plans for future, and rich and  influential have resorted to siphoning off benefits, leaving the destitute high and  dry.  

In hindsight, this kind of relief, even though can bring benefits, it should be used discreetly because every poverty- stricken county might not qualify for this relaxation, by virtue of taking this facility for granted. 

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 

Some believe that financial assistance provided to underdeveloped nations should be waived off by developed countries. I completely concur with this proposal and shall be elucidating my stand in upcoming paragraphs.   

Developing nations are incapable of providing necessities to their inhabitants, and the conditions are exacerbated when they have to repay the money loaned to them, pushing them into a perennial cycle of repayments and taking bridging credit to meet the installment deadlines. However, If their financial burden is alleviated, they will have enough to provide their citizens with basic facilities, such as food, shelter and health; and develop infrastructure like education, employment venues, transportation. This is likely to bring the natives of the destitute societies closer to acceptable living standards that afford all the facilities, as well as earnings to afford a comfortable life. 

Moreover, this would prove to be highly advantageous for affluent regions as they would be in a position to harness cheap labor, infrastructure and resources of the beneficiary nations, developed after investing the money saved from debt repayment. Similarly, businesses of donor countries will be able to create new markets for their goods and services. For instance, several regions in Asia, Africa and Latin America have emerged as promising markets for mobile phones like  Apple; cars like BMW; and electronic appliances such as General Electric, helping large organizations of elite nations to flourish globally. Above all, this will help mitigate the pressing problem of influx of illegal refugees into prosperous countries from extremely destitute nations.

Overall, it can be safely asserted that this step will have a positive influence on the global economy. Where the impoverished nations will enjoy better standards of living, the benefactors will yield rich returns in the form of cheap resources and stemming certain challenges. 

Crime is nearly always related to the environment in which it occurs. For this reason, international laws and international law courts are unrealistic and will not succeed in reducing crime levels in different countries. Discuss. - Ielts Essay

Crime is nearly always related to the environment in which it occurs. For this reason, international laws and international law courts are unrealistic and will not succeed in reducing crime levels in different countries. Discuss.

 

Ielts Essay - International law and crime 

Crime has by far been the biggest malady that has inflicted misery on humans ever since they settled down. Several crime theorists link the commission of criminal acts to the social surroundings and environment. This blurs the possibility of international law courts effectively dealing with people leading a lifestyle of deviant behavior.

Trans-national laws and courts would be ineffective in bringing criminals to the book since the elements fostering crime across different parts of the world, many a time, depend on interaction of social and biological traits. People in disparate and sisimilar communities are brought up in diverse surroundings and their mindsets are synchronized with the native lifestyle and aspirations.  Understanding basic differences between distinct lifestyles; and gaining a deep insight into how and why individuals resort to illegal activities, is an insurmountable task. Compiling a comprehensive data on these aspects would prove to a time consuming, expensive, and thus,  a futile exercise. 

Moreover, there is a very bleak chance of any consensus being reached on scope and jurisdiction of global  law courts, in regards to the definition of crime. Creating a harmonization between diverse definitions of how should unlawful endeavors be defined is absolutely difficult as what is regarded as illegal activity in one country may not find a mention at all in others.

However, it is proven that international courts have been able to curb several activities deemed as unlawful universally, like piracy, child and human trafficking, war crimes, terror funding, drug trafficking and child pornography. Many perpetrators have already been nailed by trans-national laws and courts.

In the nutshell, I feel that even though right now idea of international laws and courts may seem to be a far-fetched dream, this concept is evolving and finding more and more acceptance world over.