Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree

• . students should focus on other activities too as it help them to develop skills 
• . can even adapt something else as a career option rather than choosing academic 
• . other activities can help in creating a fresh environment 
• . they will learn to create a balance between extra curricular activities and studies. 

Disagree

• . as huge amount of fees are being charged by the university, and the first goal of student needs to be the academic performance, other activities can be done later and competition 

In modern times, university goers are mostly focusing on studies and most of their time is spent on improving academic performance, whereas some believe that they should spend their time in other activities too. I completely agree with this view completely and shall elucidate my views in the following paragraphs. 

 The significant development of the technology has created peer pressure, and individuals attending university programs tend to stay fully occupied in academics because the job market has become competitive, so that they can  gain rich employment opportunities like their classmates and acquaintances.  Similarly, they must bear an extremely high amount of fees, which creates a burden on their families, persuading them to stay focussed only on their studies. 

However, students need to be introduced to other activities too as it helps them to escape the mundane, and rejuvenate their minds, which can help them enhance their focus on their studies. Undeniably, programs offered in varsities are loaded with complex syllabus that involves undertaking projects, assignments and sometimes practicals, which can be mentally taxing, but partaking in cocurricular endeavors can earn them a much required healthy distraction, allowing them to unwind and refresh their minds. For instance, most globally-acknowledged universities like University of Glasgow, encourage their pupils to participate in sports, arts and other endeavors, so as to allow them to let off steam. Furthermore, this will help them to develop skills and to be free from their chaotic schedules, which can lead to broader thinking and creative mindsets. 

In hindsight, dispute aside, by analyzing both the views, being academically strong can help in building up a strong career, but taking part in extra-curricular undertakings can lead better academic outcomes, as well as foster resourcefulness. 

Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantage of being self- employed?

Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantage of being self- employed?

Reasons 

• .Flexibility in working schedule.
• .freedom and independence
• .creative

Drawbacks 

• . irregular income
• . lack of job security 
• . lack of benefits provided by the companies 
• . excess of workload or burden 
• . no regular working hours 
• . imbalance financial support 

In recent years, individuals are preferring to opt for self-owned commercial ventures rather than working with companies and organizations. This essay will discuss the primary reason for this shift, and also examine drawbacks of being self employed. 

At the outset, one of the main reasons pushing people to choose self employment is the flexible working hours, with no restrictions on the timings. Working schedules can be planned as per the requirements and availability of timings as per individual requirements, instead of being tied to the nine to five regimes. On top of that, one can be their own boss, instead of reporting to others, facing their whims, and slog to attain targets imposed on them, and can make independent decisions without any hindrance.  

However, self employment comes with various disadvantages. Financial instability can be a major concern, as income could be irregular and unpredictable at crucial stages, besides absence of employment security. Unlike salaries and other non-monetary benefits received from employers, one does not receive allowances such as health insurance, paid leaves, extra bonus or retirement contributions as one is at their own device. 

Furthermore, running their own business requires one to devote longer working hours, whether while initiating new endeavors, or expanding them, predisposing them to consistent struggle and stress levels. Additionally, arranging financial resources is always a complicated  matter since one is responsible for sustaining their credit rating, and many times lenders turn down loan requests, making business susceptible to slowing down or closing.  

In hindsight, even though the factors driving people into establishing their own enterprises are quite justified and tend to render them desired outcomes, the challenges this can bring along also tend to be significant: financial insecurity, unstable incomes, and perennial toils to survive. 

Environmental problems such as pollution and climate change affect all the people in the world. Although global decisions are made to reduce these problems, the solutions are not effective. Why are the solutions ineffective? How can these problems be solved?

Environmental problems such as pollution and climate change affect all the people in the world. Although global decisions are made to reduce these problems, the solutions are not effective. Why are the solutions ineffective? How can these problems be solved?

Problem stems from following reasons: (why are solutions ineffective)  

• Ever rising population which must be provided with the facilities and thus, the situation continues as it is 
• The democratically states fear earning the wrath/ anger of their  constituents: applying those solutions might mean penalizing their own people. 
• The governments also do not want to risk economic performance: implementing decisions might lead to closing down of factories and offices, this will not only impact employment but also economic productivity. 
• There is lack of knowledge and expertise 
• There is a lack of trust among nations: many poor nations feel that these decisions have been taken by rich countries to impede the development 

Ways out 

• Allocating responsibility to each nation and also installing a system of credits to the countries that comply with
• Sharing of technology 
• Penalizing and boycotting the countries that fail to adhere to norms.

All global efforts invested into meeting the challenges facing the planet posed by pollution have comprehensibly failed to produce any tangible outcomes. This can be attributed to several reasons, and it is imperative to discover plausible solutions to surmount this complication.

The implementation of international action such as the Paris Resolution, to counter environmental deterioration is marred by unwillingness of governments to apply the universally adopted resolutions, locally. They are either compelled by the need to fulfill the requirements: food, shelter, and clothing, of the ever-rising population - coercing them to put environmental concerns on the back seat, or forced to put all actions on hold, out of the fear that embracing such policies might hamper economy quite severely, and creating joblessness. 

Similarly, a great imbalance in the distribution of resources and expertise required to resolve this imbroglio is also partly to blame. While the elite nations have access to technologies and money needed to deploy for climate mitigation, the underdeveloped societies face a deep dearth of these, and to exacerbate the situation, the cooperation between both the lobbies is missing.

Although the panacea for this situation is not readily available, things can be improved by enhancing collaboration, and taking joint responsibility for addressing issues arising out of current circumstances. Technology transfer and liberal access to resources for all, can help persuade every nation to switch to greener technologies and methods. Additionally, every inhabitant of the earth should be apprised about surroundings becoming inhospitable for future generations in case the current occupants fail to respond to concurrent problems. 

In hindsight, deriving intended results from universal  endeavors aimed at resolving the environmental puzzle is contingent on closer cooperation at the international level and engendering pragmatic foresight about imminent catastrophe awaiting humanity, in case warnings are disregarded.  

Some people believe that educating children at home provides more benefits than sending them to school. Do the advantages of home-schooling outweigh the disadvantages

Some people believe that educating children at home provides more benefits than sending them to school. Do the advantages of home-schooling outweigh the disadvantages

In the contemporary era, many say that providing home-schools to juveniles is more beneficial for youngsters rather than sending them to formal tuition. Even though this has certain benefits to offer I believe they are exceeded by drawbacks. 

One of the major advantages of homeschooling is that it allows personalized learning, children can learn at their own pace, with lessons being taught  as per their  strengths and weaknesses. Teachers schedule lessons as per the ability of their students and adjust the speed of lesson delivery, and also offers clarifications for doubts that their latter might face since their focus is completely on these limited students. For instance, Iceland has experienced positive growth in homeschoolings due to tutors finding it easy to negotiate the challenges of educating a limited number of students, quite efficiently.  Similarly, children can clarify their doubts without inhibitions since there is no one to judge, or subdue them. 

Notwithstanding the benefits of rendering schooling at home, homeschooled children may have fewer daily chances to interact with peers. Social skills and group communication may need extra attention. Furthermore, homeschools lack the special assistance from facilities like science labs, sports teams and communication sessions conducted by the various schools for preparing them for various challenges. Schools have highly trained and professional teachers who are experienced and offer real time clarifications since they have all the required equipment and aids at their disposal, which is not at all possible in home settings. 

In hindsight, parents should make their wards to be a part of formal schooling as it will create a studious environment and will help them to be a part of cultural society and ease in making friends and understanding, helping, sharing and caring. 

In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports. What are the consequences of doping for athletes? What measures should be taken to combat this issue?

In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports. What are the consequences of doping for athletes? What measures should be taken to combat this issue?

In the contemporary era, there is an ongoing debate on growing problems of doping among athletes. People who prefer consuming performance enhancing drugs are facing many consequences. I will analyze and share plausible measures which can be adopted. 

To start with, people believe that enhancing performance allows better performance in career, which makes athletes use such material even though these pose severe health risks such as heart diseases, and so forth. Apart from that, it could lead to addiction by continuous consumption; eventually, causing mental disorders, aggression and anxiety, along with severe ramifications, in the  form of physical disability or loss of life. To exemplify, many professional wrestlers like Diamen Djordi from Romania, were involved in doping, which severely impacted their lives, and caused death at a young age.

On top of that, other serious impacts include the career facing disruptions caused by suspensions, or coming to an end due to imposition of ban and prohibition. This could lead to damaging the public image and reputation, and loss of sponsorships. For instance, there are many famous players who became involved in doping, their careers are often completely destroyed due to loss of reputation, and health complications. 

Having said that, there are many measures which can be opted to combat this issue, making athletes under strict and regular monitoring could help in coping with the doping factor, charging high penalties. To illustrate, in European countries, educational programmes for sports personnel to spread awareness among the athletes about avoiding doping and drug use.  

In hindsight, drug users are impacting their career and public image. Additionally, doping is impacting their health, affecting their physical and mental wellness. Thus, strict laws and restrictions, along with appropriate regulation should be implemented.  

In many countries, coffee chains are expanding rapidly, which some claim threatens the survival of small local cafés. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In many countries, coffee chains are expanding rapidly, which some claim threatens the survival of small local cafés. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree? 

• Uniform pricing, wherever one goes will pay similar amounts 

• Uniform products 

• Large scale operations which make these ubiquitous 

• Bigger investments, aggressive advertising and marketing 

• Offers in collaborations with other domains 

• Provide comfortable ambience and allow people to spend time there   

Disagree 

• Unique atmosphere and environment allow them to survive 

• Cater to local tastes

• Are more flexible with menus and can tweak things quickly  

• Their location and existence for long brings them loyalty 

Undeniably, the growing ubiquity of large cafe chains is fueling cafe culture, but  is this pushing smaller stand-alone establishments out of business, is a matter worthy of deeper pondering, to ascertain whether this fear is well-founded or unwarranted. 

Large organizations with multiple outlets boast of colossal investments in extensive and aggressive advertising strategies, helping them to enhance their visibility and outreach, enticing more and more consumers, persuading them to engage with these brands more frequently. For example, gigantic enterprises can afford to run promotional schemes, and enter into collaboration with brands operating in other domains, such as clothing, to engage their audience actively. This is something out of bounds for the small-scale companies; consequently, forming a notion that they are losing out to their bigger rivals.

Similarly, large chains stores have become a vogue, especially among the youth, due to their charisma: they offer extensive range of beverages and food - sometimes international, and not available locally - of homogenous quality, but unique, and at uniform prices, helping develop a taste among their customers for these offerings, and fetching brand loyalty. This is making some abandon their affiliation to regional options, and follow the universal companies. 

Nevertheless, in the face of stiff competition, many locally known cafes are still able to hold their ground well, owing to the niche they have been able to create for themselves owing to their exclusive local flavor, something even the best global brands cannot replicate. To corroborate, several cafes world over: Proud Mary in Portland and Bercos in Delhi, have continued to co-exist with global giants.

In hindsight, although international and large cafe chains have overwhelmed the market, numerous establishments have endured this rivalry, and held steadfast, and their loss is extremely limited to some youngsters seeking broader  experience beyond coffee      

Politicians are more responsible for the protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Politicians are more responsible for the protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

When it comes to protecting the planet it is said that policy makers are the ones who have a greater responsibility to undertake this endeavor than citizens. I partially agree with the notion and believe the change can only happen when both the parties contribute to this critical task,  and shall elaborate my stand in the following paragraphs.  

To start with, those watching the role of policy makers feel that they can make the changes to preserve the ecology by making various laws, and everyone  will follow this without questions, having a wider impact on the populace and surroundings; no one will be prepared to face the wrath of authorities. For example; Indian government prohibited mining on the outskirts of New Delhi, and imposed heavy penalties on offenders. Consequently, this activity was completely halted, helping protect the natural ecology of the region. Similarly the government has the resources like money and expertise to save the atmosphere. 

Nevertheless, some believe that it is not only the state that should don the mantle of this essential mission, citizens should also come forward  because the damage that has already been done cannot be undone by a single entity, but can only be cured if all will join hands and work for the betterment. To illustrate, any law cannot take effect unless inhabitants comply with those and adopt sustainable practices. They  are the root cause of all the mess: they are cutting down trees, using and littering plastic, burning fossil fuel, and so on. Thus, they must also share the onus.    

In hindsight, disputes aside,  saving the planet for future generations cannot be a task that should be negotiated by only the state, it is necessary for inhabitants of a country to contribute in equal measures. 

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence will increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence will increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Death sentence as a necessity for preventing unlawful incidents of brutal intent,   has been a debatable topic for a long time as a part of society believes that its role is pivotal, whereas others question its implications. This matter will need a profound analysis, as per me. 

Numerous criminologists support enforcement of laws of executing those convicted of violent illegal felonies on the assumption that this is the sole medium that can incite fear among perpetrators, and dissuade them from taking extreme steps that jeopardizes safety and lives of others. For example, wherever such a statute has been implemented: Saudi Arabia, Iran and UAE, among others, antisocial acts involving savagery have dipped sharply. Moreover, this arrangement also acts as a deterrent to discourage others by setting precedents. 

Nonetheless,  those arguing against this policy suggest that, except in a few regions, there is no proof that judicial murders have been helpful in mitigating unlawful acts intended to cause bodily harm to victims. As per them, unless those intending to follow such deviant ways are trained to control their animal instincts; and reformed,  there is no law that can counter instances of violent lawbreaking.  For example, countries like Russia and the USA that have a followed a zero tolerance policy for criminal endeavors of brutal intent, have miserably failed to control rapes, murders, rioting, and so on. However,  this might be due to the laxity of law enforcement agencies and patronage provided by the influential and the rich to those engaged in antisocial undertakings, which emboldens them to continue with their methods.  

To conclude, judicial execution, despite raising doubts among certain sections, is a necessity since barring a few hardened criminals, this system has remained effective in curtailing a majority of incidents of brutal acts.  

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The discourse over who should be accountable for maintaining the healthy ways of life: citizens or the state,  is multifaceted. While some put the onus on the former, others vouch for the intervention from the latter. Both the views are augmented by justified opinions, which shall be delved deeper into in the following paragraphs. 

On one hand, proponents of citizens bearing this burden argue that maintaining well being is a personal choice. They believe that one should take ownership of their health by making a proper diet plan,  exercise and their own well being; they are impacted directly by the consequences resulting from ignorance of their health needs. Also, this viewpoint emphasizes personal freedom and obligation, suggesting that people are positioned better to comprehend their own needs and preferences and maneuver accordingly. For example, someone opting to eat a balanced diet, exercise regularly, and circumvent harmful habits, like smoking, is a self-selected option,  for one can experience direct rewards fetched by such an arrangement. 

On the contrary, some argue that policy makers have a crucial role in ensuring a fair health index of society. This perspective suggests that not everyone has equal access to the resources necessary for sustainable health, such as education, nutrition, food and healthcare, making it imperative for politicians to don the mantle to help ensure mitigation of diseases, disorders and ailments.  This will help sustain economic productivity and minimize expenditure incurred on extending health care support to those inflicted by illnesses due to paucity of expertise and know-how about circumventing ill-health.

In conclusion, while individual responsibility is crucial for maintaining a healthy lifestyle, government support is equally important in providing the necessary infrastructure and resources to make healthy choices accessible to all. Both approaches are essential in promoting a healthier society.

In the future, people may no longer be able to pay for things in shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or using phones. Do you think this will happen one day? Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using cash?

In the future, people may no longer be able to pay for things in shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or using phones. Do you think this will happen one day? Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using cash?

As the world is progressing, digital payment methods are anticipated to supersede conventional methods of transacting, but there will still be some continuing with the old mediums of negotiating monetary obligations.  

To start with, a lobby propounds that online payments are easy and convenient to use. This is to say, one can remit money just by clicking a button on their smartphones while sitting at their homes, eliminating the tedious task of visiting ATMs. Moreover, due to the advent of these means, the relief from the cumbersome task of carrying bulky wallets is encouraging many to use e-transactions.

Similarly, this prediction is also bolstered by the young generation being more technologically oriented, and  increasingly making use of this innovative practice to shop in brick and mortar stores, or online, order food, pay bills, and so forth, without needing to plan their everyday budget. Apart from that,  several rewards such as cash back, and many offer, is helping make the virtual means of transacting ubiquitous.    

Having said that, many, especially the elderly,  are likely to stay wedded to the idea of using ancient ways, and be wary of virtual payments since they might not be tech savvy enough to use modern tools. Additionally,  some will continue not to trust this new introduction; they will fear that their money might get stolen, helping paper-based retain its popularity. For example, a recent survey revealed that due to the rapid rise in cyber crimes, many continue to use cash even in the digital age. 

In conclusion, I profoundly believe that paying digitally will be in fashion, but the traditional channel will surely endure and cannot be written off. Saying that people might switch completely to modern financial devices is a far-fetched idea.  

Some argue that teachers should focus on academics more than motivating students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some argue that teachers should focus on academics more than motivating students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Undeniably, there is profound debate raging among varied sections about whether academics should be prioritized over encouraging students. Some subscribe to this notion, while others dissent. I will critically analyze this matter in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, some professes that teachers are the main pillar in helping carve the careers of students: they build the educational foundations by disseminating the syllabus containing the deep knowledge of the world. Therefore, imparting knowledge for academics makes youngsters accomplish their task to fulfill the needs of their future career which is based on academics only. Moreover, students must know that learning all subjects will persuade them to compete among themselves, and excel. Also, it is imperative to keep academics on the top since only this can inculcate knowledge about professional domains, helping learners discover their interest areas, such as healthcare, engineering and IT, to name a few.

Nevertheless, there is another lobby that opposes the former notion and asserts that educators must don the role of mentors, along with delivering scholastic knowledge: this can assist even the average performers to try to harness their abilities, get clarifications and augment their performance, prevent them from abandoning education, a common feature and growing concern in several countries, where pupils are dissuaded from continuing schooling due to poor academic performance. Likewise,  this can also help them discover their latent talents. Several accomplished people like APJ Abdul Kalam Azad, the former president of India, credited his achievements to the guidance rendered by his teacher. 

To capitulate, I vehemently align myself with the view that teaching professionals must not overlook any aspect of their job: delivering subject knowledge can help foster acumen required for later life as adults, while mentorship can assist learners to continue despite facing pressures.   

The higher proportion of the older population will overtake the younger generation. What is the reason? Is it positive or negative development?

The higher proportion of the older population will overtake the younger generation. What is the reason? Is it positive or negative development?

A burning phenomenon is surfacing: the prospect of demographic composition leaning in the favor of the old populace. The reason seems to stem from many factors, which will be discussed in the following paragraphs and a conclusion will be drawn whether this trend is beneficial or not.

To start with, as the world is progressing, many diseases have been eradicated due to advancement in medical fields, which has resulted in elongating life expectancy, especially among elders. By virtue of this, there has been an increase in the number of old individuals. Moreover, low birthrate among youngsters is another cause for this prevailing tendency. This is to say, many are dissuaded from becoming parents since they are engrossed in their professional obligations in order to meet ends and make a sufficient living for themselves; consequently leading to a negative population growth. For example, in Japan, young individuals are working their fingers to the bone to fulfill their basic needs, not giving a bean about offsprings, and hence witnessing climbing index of the older people every year.

Having said that, this is surely a detrimental trend. If such scenarios take a peak, there will be a dearth of young professionals suited for essential jobs: masonry, plumbing, miners, fishermen and so on, where physical strength is a much required trait. Similarly, there will be an immense burden on the government to support the retired people. In other words, the lawmakers have to increase the financial allocation on medical grants, pensions and old-age homes, ultimately shifting the pressure on tax payers to pay more. To corroborate, a recent survey revealed that many are incapacitated to save for the future since they are paying additionally to aid the old age homes and pensions.

In conclusion, this population composition shift is being fueled by advanced medical facilities that have helped ensure longevity, and lower birth rates. However, this transition presents a bleak picture since there will be less young workers for completing specific jobs and the state will have to support the aging populace.

An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What are the problems associated with and some possible solutions?

 An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What are the problems associated with and some possible solutions?

The world is witnessing a serious paradigm shift, where professionals such as doctors and educators are relocating to richer societies and leaving their underdeveloped countries. This makes it imperative to discuss the plethora of concerns arising out of this phenomenon, with a few possible remedies.

Due to this trend, many destitute nations are losing their highly skilled workers, creating a deep dearth of talent that could be utilized for the benefits of their fellow citizens. For example, many Japanese teachers are migrating to Germany in search of greener pastures, and as a result, Japan, no longer, has access to qualified educators for schools, turning the future of children bleak. Moreover, governments often subsidize education in high-end skills like engineering, and when graduates - from these streams - leave, not only the destitute countries lose talent but also the money invested in training them, eventually, nations become bereft  of deserving returns on these investments, deepening the crisis.

However, there are numerous viable solutions to stem this exodus. Destitute countries can create openings with lucrative salaries for those working in strategic sectors, and are prone to be tempted by the allure of better earnings and life abroad. This could help in retaining the talent, benefiting society and ensuring rich dividends. Additionally, countries can implement mandatory return incentives: grants, fast-track promotions, and  so forth, to encourage those working overseas to repatriate. Furthermore, prosperous nations should also follow ethical recruitment practices and avoid the overpooling, or aggressive hiring, from the nations suffering from severe shortage. 

To conclude, the mass immigration of professionals causes shortage of skilled workers and governments lose resources invested into the education of these workers. However,  by improving pay-scale, establishing comeback grants and international cooperation, developing nations can surmount these challenges and retain their invaluable human resources.

We have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets. Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside the earth? What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

We have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets. Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside the earth? What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Do you believe? 

Yes? Why 

• Assumption: out of the billion stars, some might be having  planets revolving around them and that might be having life-supporting conditions. 
• Recent revelations made by probes sent on Mars have proven that outer space can support life,  and thus it is only a matter of time that some other places will be located soon. 
• Unsolicited and unproven sightings of UFOs hold some concrete background: one can hallucinate, but not in all cases

No? Why  

• There is absolutely no/little  chance of life being located on other planets: till now all the claims of UFO sightings have been overruled 
• Even after sending probes to other parts of solar system,  gazing in the universe, trying to catch radio signal from other planets have yielded little.

Implications 

• This could result in some positive outcomes, if life supporting conditions on other planets were found, humans would have other places to populate in the space 
• The resources of those locations could be tapped 
• Humanity may stumble across a much advanced and intelligent civilisation that could help resolve the severe challenges being faced currently on the earth. 

Negative 

• As many fear, based on the opinions created by sci-fi movies that alien life may not be friendly and might eliminate humanity 
• In reality, even if life if life is found, humans are unlikely to gain anything from that: there is an absence of technology that can enable speedy space travel, but it will surely cost several arms  and legs if such endeavors are continued   

It is highly unlikely that the human race is the only occupant of such a vast universe, and it is simply a matter of time when such discovery will be actually  made. This aspect will be elucidated in the following paragraphs along with the benefits this knowledge will fetch.

To commence with, the prospects of stumbling upon life forms beyond the realms of the earth are quite high, and augmented/supported by unofficial reports of UFO sightings even though  scientists are cautious/circumspect about admitting these incidents as real. However, they themselves are quite optimistic about being able to find aliens on one of the millions of the planets revolving around their stars, and having hospitable conditions. In 2024, the Hubble telescope revealed in one of its explorations that there were at least 300 planets that housed a similar environment to that of the blue planet.

This discernment/enlightenment could prove to be rewarding for mankind; it would become possible to find alternative locations in the heavens that could be populated by shifting some inhabitants to those areas, easing the burden on resources back home. Similarly, the materials and minerals found on those heavenly bodies could be brought back for the consumption by earthlings.

Moreover, the experts also propose that this endeavour could also precipitate a meaningful interaction between humans and extraterrestrial civilizations, wherein the latter the virtue of being highly advanced, could pass on the knowledge of surmounting challenges posed by exhaustion of natural resources, pollution, and nuclear holocaust/destruction caused by atomic wars.    

In hindsight, the optimism propelling space research undertakings are guided by the belief that there are other places harbouring life, and this enlightenment will surely afford panacea for the myriad challenges facing the inhabitant of the earth.

Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions.

Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions.

The advent of modern technology has made entertainment  portable; consequently, many believe movies can be watched on hand-held devices, eliminating the need to go to the movie theaters, while others believe that the latter cannot be forgotten. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.

To start with, a lobby asserts that equipment such as mobiles, have made it convenient for users to watch movies on them. One can simply click a button on their screen, while being in the comfort of their homes and enjoy their favourite motion pictures at any time of the day. Moveover, many OTT platforms, commonly available on small internet-assisted apparatus,  charge nominal subscription fees, making it affordable to watch content of any genre through a single application. While this is not the case going to the cinema, where tickets are exorbitantly priced, and for one ticket, there will be only one movie.

Having said that, some still uphold the idea of visiting a cinema hall: it is a therapy for many. In other words, such activities aid in eliminating stress, help earn relaxation and rejuvenate the mind. Additionally, state-of-the-art theaters let their clients obtain  memorable, life-like and thrilling experiences: mesmerising surround sounds, rotating chairs, in-house dining services, and many more, making the most when seeing a movie. For example, in Japan, movie halls are equipped with high-tech acoustics and best-in-class seats to turn the experience of watching a movie into a nostalgic memory. .

To conclude, disputes apart, watching films on mobile phones render convenience and affordability, whereas, cinema halls are equipped with the up-to-date technology to enhance movie experience. I believe both the endeavours have their own benefits and one can choose according to their needs since both offer distinct facilities. 

Some people today argue that the media has become increasingly nostalgic and unoriginal. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people today argue that the media has become increasingly nostalgic and unoriginal. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree 

• Most people are used to the content that has already been produced and cannot be replicated, so media houses go on producing sequels of those 
• The multitude of investment has risen manifolds and investors do not want to risk into experimentation 
• Even in music, most are shifting back to the classic style 

Disagree 

• The unconventional approach still thrives: movies and operas have moved away from glamor of star-like appearances to content that portrays more real life like situations 
• Even if some old content is being showcased, it is in modern perspective and not dependent on the old narratives. 

Are the concurrent media houses truly being blamed for reproducing the old content, and displaying lack of imagination, or it is a misplaced notion, is a matter that needs a critical analysis before arriving at a well-reasoned conclusion. 

Those harbouring the belief that modern producers of films, soap operas, music, and so forth, have started resorting to replicating the material produced in the past because there is a conspicuous void of inventiveness. Contemporary creators, due to their overwhelming reliance on technology in every sphere of life, cannot think out-of-the-box, forcing them to draw inspiration from something created some decades, or centuries ago, and adapt them to address the taste of the present audience.

Moreover, the current generation does not have any achievement to its credit, whereas their predecessors had to face struggles and catastrophic events, and so forth, that rendered them a stimulus to make something that portrayed the hardships facing humanity in ingenious ways. However, the current generation lacks first-hand experience, and thus, base their portrayals on formerly created material.

Nevertheless, despite the former view holding some substance, it lacks universal acceptance; the human mind is a huge repository of diverse experiences, feelings, and aspirations, and responds to surroundings in novel ways, showcased in various manifestations of art. Those accusing content creators of lacking ingenuity are themselves unable to absorb changes in presentations. To corroborate, movies and serials have moved from being dramatic to being more realistic: something which the older generation finds incompatible and only watches something that matches their expectations even if the plot is old.

In conclusion, there may be some simply emulating content produced in yesteryears; nonetheless, a majority of media organizations circumvent using old ideas, and tend to rely on their resourcefulness to formulate material that exhibits freshness. 

   

Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age. This is called peer pressure. Do the disadvantages of this issue outweigh the advantages of it?

Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age. This is called peer pressure. Do the disadvantages of this issue outweigh the advantages of it?

Several young minds are seen becoming inclined to emulate their peers. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits of this phenomenon and conclude whether the pros outshine the pitfalls.

The primary benefit of this propensity is that one, especially underachievers, can get inspired from the attainments of fellow students and learn from them. This is to say, struggling pupils can embrace improvements in their studies by following the footsteps of  studious classmates, and enhance their scores. Moreover, they can inculcate healthy habits by taking cues from people from the same age group, effortlessly: undeniably, friends and acquaintances have a deeper impact than families on behavior. For example, a study conducted by WHO concluded that several youngsters were persuaded to exercise regularly, avoid drugs, and so forth by being persuaded by their friends and colearners. 

However, this behavior is laden with serious pitfalls too. Youngsters can absorb deviant behaviour of others and indulge into criminal activities: mugging, theft, carjacking and many more, making them go astray. Furthermore, the impact of peer conduct often fosters stubbornness and greed, where individuals pressurize their mothers and fathers to buy them all the luxuries that their friends possess, so that they  can fit into the group of peers, even if they cannot afford them. For example, a recent survey conducted by a group of psychologists revealed that many parents are struggling to fulfil the unwarranted demands of their wards since they want all the amenities that their classmates have. Thus, this proclivity can turn into a bane if allowed to develop without monitoring.  

To conclude, the shortcomings surely exceed benefits since youth find it attractive to indulge into illegal endeavours as their peers do, and pressurize families to buy them expensive items as their friends have, turning them adamant.

Some people think that it's a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it's important to keep working life completely separate from social life. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think that it's a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it's important to keep working life completely separate from social life. Discuss both views and give your opinion

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with a dilemma that one should avoid socializing after work with colleagues, or draw a line between personal and professional realms. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.

A lobby propounds that setting boundaries between work and social life is imperative. If the available time, after job, is devoted to coworkers, families will be ignored, which will precipitate disruptions in marital life, alienating and ignoring children. Hence, this time should be devoted to families only. Moreover, such endeavors lead to oversharing of personal details with co-personnel, which could be used against, or become a part of organizational politics. For example, in Japan, many often avoid going out with their co-workers since they do not want to be a part of workplace politics, or overenthusiastically share information about their familial environment, fearing that this could be weaponised and used against them.

However, some assert that mingling with colleagues fetch myriad benefits, such as getting to know each other, by learning about habits of their team members, routines, likes and dislikes; consequently, fostering a conducive and supportive working environment. Additionally, engaging for exponentially long hours at jobs can engender mental health issues. So, spending cheerful moments with fellow workers aids in relaxing and rejuvenating  stressed minds by metabolising stress hormones. To corroborate, a recent study conducted on two groups revealed that those mingling with fellow personnel outside working hours, were more content than their counterparts avoiding this practice. 

To conclude, both perspectives hold substance and I believe there should be a balance between the both: one should spend moderate time with colleagues, and families should not be ignored at the expense of devoting all the free time to those sharing work space.

Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Publicizing  pharmaceutical products has become ubiquitous today. While some think this is unacceptable because it makes people consume medicines even when they are unaware of the real cause of their problem, others feel that this helps inform the general public about different treatments. These opposing views make it imperative to assess this matter profoundly, before drawing a plausible conclusion.   

To begin with, some believe that advertisements about medicines can mislead the public. These ads usually show the benefits of a drug but do not clearly explain the side effects. Consequently, many are likely to visit their doctor and request a medicine they saw on TV, even if they do not really need it, thereby stopping them from finding the real reason behind their health issue, such as stress or an unhealthy lifestyle. Similarly, it can also lead to self-diagnosis, which may be dangerous, and expose the sick to serious, sometimes fatal,  consequences.

On the other hand, supporters of this system profess that these ads help spread awareness. Many people are not familiar with certain diseases, or treatments, and tend to ignore symptoms out of ignorance, but when they see an advertisement, they may realise that their symptoms are common and that medical help is needed. This can encourage them to visit a physician and obtain  appropriate advice. It can also reduce the fear or stigma around some health problems - as observed in cases of disorders like depression - because people feel persuaded to be more about it and seek expert medical intervention.  

In my opinion, advertising medicines can be helpful, but it should be controlled. If companies follow strict rules and provide clear information about risks, these ads can educate people without causing harm. However, without regulation, they may lead to unnecessary consumption.

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion.

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion.

Benefits of forgoing gaining insights into how preceding generations lived and behaved? 

• It can save resources, money and time, otherwise wasted in deriving inputs about about the historical facts of ancestors of an individual 
• It can prevent bias from creeping in since the bygone era might have had a scarred history of animosity and rivalries
• One cannot progress by being the prisoner of the past, and this arrangement  affords a progressive view 

Drawbacks of forgoing gaining insights into how preceding generations lived and behaved? 

• This could prove to be catastrophic: one always learns from the past mistakes 
• This would also make it hard to perpetuate moral and  ethical values and traditions 
• Could jeopardize health in case the investigation overlooked concerns looking at the medical history of family for diseases like diabetes.  

Although it is true that circumventing the events of a family experienced in the bygone eras, and looking forward can fetch umpteen benefits, there are some pitfalls associated with it. I feel this can be both rewarding, and perilous; therefore, a balanced approach is recommended to allow realization of optimum benefits.

This  newly emerging propensity can help save immense resources, in terms of money, time, and efforts, otherwise wasted in deriving inputs about ancestral history that have little relevance in the contemporary era; the social setup, occupational hierarchy, and working methods have been completely transformed and the traditional knowledge has become irrelevant today. For instance, since the advent of computers, the process of negotiating obligations in all walks of life have undergone massive alterations, making it imperative to embrace future technologies, and continuing with the conventional system could only hamper progress. 

However, this trend could prove to be a recipe for disaster, especially when it comes to diagnosing the extent of hereditary ailments, like diabetes, cardiac conditions, and thyroid, to name a few. It is critical to examine the family history of such medical conditions to formulate appropriate treatment strategies, but disregarding the past could only deprive the ailing the appropriate remedies, exacerbating their sufferings.

Similarly, this will make perpetuation of culture and traditions difficult because detaching oneself from the knowledge will deprive the young generation of the invaluable information connected to their customs, and they will abandon those soon. To corroborate, several rituals and cultural practices in Asia, America, and Europe, are disappearing because of this propensity.  

In hindsight, it will be disastrous to follow this tendency whole-heartedly as this could have severe ramifications for health and continuation of traditional systems though this can be applied in domains where modern tools have gained dominance. 

Intro 1

There is a growing tendency to circumvent foraying/exploring the events, associated with the bygone eras, that families experienced. Even though this tendency offers umpteen benefits, it is hard to overlook the pitfalls linked with this practice.

Intro 2

Many have started looking at the possibilities they could utilize in upcoming years and circumvent exploring the events a family experienced in the bygone eras. This tendency can prove to be beneficial in several cases, nonetheless it is hard to overlook its pitfalls.