Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true.

Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true.

Holding a university degree is the only way to attain triumph, is a common perception that evokes mixed responses: while some support this, others reject it. The following paragraphs shall profoundly delve into this matter, and share a logical conclusion.

To start with, a lobby opines that graduating from a varsity is critical: it is a pre-qualification criteria for many renowned companies and legal firms who seek those completing university courses. Besides this, these institutions integrate industrial placements, capstone projects  and internships, in their curriculum, allowing students to gain academic and practical knowledge during their course span. Also, learners are exposed to myriads of methods of research writing, which help in enhancing their critical thinking and resourcefulness. A survey conducted by Howard University revealed that eighty percent university graduates have outstanding skills in conducting research and in analyzing data, something in great demand today. 

Nevertheless, others profess that varsity degrees are not the only way to attain objectives, there are other methods as well, to earn excellence and  realize desires: online courses, crash courses, diploma and certification programmes, that target trade-specific acumen, offered by colleges and specialist institutions. Apart from this, if one has intuitive skills, no formal degrees are required to harness those to obtain pinnacle.  An article “qualifications and entrepreneurs” was published in Forbes, wherein top twenty successful businessmen like Bill Gates, were interviewed, and it was revealed that they did not hold any university degrees, yet they achieved colossally by relying on their innate traits, experience and consistent efforts.

In hindsight, disputes aside, in contemporary times, pursuing studies at university is far more important than relying on expertise and seasoning. The structure of varsity programmes helps brush up and foster dexterity, that allows making inroads into premier employment giving organizations.  

In some countries, it is believed that crime among young people is increasing. What do you think are the reasons for this trend? What types of punishment or approaches are most suitable for young offenders? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In some countries, it is believed that crime among young people is increasing. What do you think are the reasons for this trend? What types of punishment or approaches are most suitable for young offenders?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Reasons 

• Economic factors: lack of jobs and impoverishment 

• Social factor: peer pressure and advent of social media,and the situation is exacerbated by lack of proper counseling  

• Lack of parental monitorings and guidance 

Suitable punitive measures 

• Engaging the young perpetrators in restoring the damage caused to places or assets 

• Reformation and redemption through rehabilitation 

• Educational support

• Community initiatives should be run to involve youngsters in constructive activities  

• Warnings and retention

This surging incidence of unlawful endeavors involving young individuals has become a pressing concern across the world, making it imperative to delve into attributes driving this phenomenon, and discovering probable remedies to stem this trend. 

The most prominent factor driving this tendency is a deterioration in familial, and social values and circumstances which has made the young generation lose its sense of direction, and stop distinguishing between right or wrong. Perpetrators, as young as those in their teens, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds, are reportedly found engaging in activities such as mugging, robbing,  vandalizing public property, and so forth, in all urban centres on the globe, as has been reported by the Washington post. 

Likewise,  another factor underpinning the propensity to break laws amongst youngsters is abject poverty, and accompanying unemployment, forcing young people to resort to deviant ways to earn livelihood and survive. To corroborate, as per WHO, nearly ninety percent of pickpocketing and snatching in cities like London and New York, to name a few, can be ascribed to the jobless poor youth, unable to earn lawfully. 

This social malady can be cured effectively provided families, community, and lawmakers join hands, to afford counseling, alternative skills training, and community services and activities, to the delinquent young. Moreover, selective punitive measures such as detention in correction facilities that san hardened criminals can also help curtail this development. For example, Singapore Police has successfully reformed numerous young offenders by sending them to rehabilitation schools and offering them occupational training. 

To conclude, most young unlawful elements embrace anti-social ways of life owing to absence of appropriate enlightenment about righteousness, resources for survival and jobs. However, concerted efforts by every responsible component of society can help mitigate this complication, and reform the youth.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 A fierce debate is raging whether mitigating income disparity can lead to a happier society. Some subscribe to this, while others dissent. I will critically analyse this notion and share a plausible conclusion.

 To start with, blurring the wealth gap between the elite and the impoverished will allow everyone access to essential amenities: health care, housing, and food, to survive, where some are either ors completely deprived of these services, or they are dependent on others. Moreover, all population sectors will be treated equally and they will also respect each other, resulting in harmony and peace. This will also reduce the crime rate as people get constrained to commit crime due the disproportionate appropriation of money,  and  lack of basic necessities. 

 Having said that, those skeptical about this approach assert that erasing such dissimilarity is not the only way to engineer a cheerful social environment. There are other aspects as well to concentrate on: education, mental health, personal freedom, and cultural values, to name a few. Moreover, this approach will cause more disgruntlement among those who are laborious and they are consistent in their efforts, resulting in capital flight from the country.  Likewise, there are countries with uneven resource distribution, that have been able to create social bonhomie by focusing on affording access to essential services: health and quality education, to allow the populace to become self-reliant and autonomous, and capable of earning their daily bread and also care for their health.  

 

To capitulate, I do not agree with this notion as alleviating uneven wealth dispersion is not a panacea for ensuring a conducive social environment; such cosseting will produce a generation of complacent individuals while discouraging their hard-working counterparts. Rather, the focus should be on guaranteeing civil liberties and egalitarian access to facilities. 

Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 A common perception that schools/institutions are for making children responsible towards society rather than focusing on their personal growth, evokes mixed responses, while some support this, others reject it. The following paragraphs shall profoundly delve into this matter and share a logical conclusion.

To start with, a lobby opines that the only motive of the educational institutions is to make juveniles responsible only for society. Schools have curriculums that include moral education, which teach students about the basic moral values of a civilized person in society such as helping people, the concept of sharing is caring and giving back to society. Apart from this, it is considered that when wards go to schools, they meet other classmates, they start learning with them which directly instills the sense of belongingness in them. They pick up many good habits, which ultimately help them in becoming good human beings. For example, an interview was conducted with youngsters, wherein some situational based questions were asked, shockingly eighty five percent of people’s answers revealed that schools are the foundation for making them civilized in society.

Nevertheless, other lobby profess that schools also play an  important role in grooming individual personalities as they prepare them for their upcoming life by making them participate in cultural activities and sports, speaking and performing on stage, which help in making them self-confident and fearless. Moreover, nowadays schools are also offering personality development classes, wherein they provide tailored classes as per the requirement of each individual.

 To sum up, I opine that indeed, children always learn basic etiquettes from schools such as teamwork, helping others, and so on, but do not forget they also help them in grooming individually when it comes to their skills, completions.

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?                

Today, one can explore the internet to study or gain knowledge, while in yesteryears they had  to peruse books and paper.  This scenario has its own benefits and problems, but whether the former eclipses the latter is a matter that needs a profound analysis.   

Data being available online has its own advantages, like at one click one can get information: searching for a place to go, looking for upcoming events,  deriving study material and many more. This helps one manage their day-to-day routine and works differently for different people. Furthermore, it helps students to learn and study easily: they can find information online conveniently without needing to carry or browse through heavy paper-based material, saving them time and effort.  

Similarly, this arrangement is extremely ecologically sustainable: the  advent of the internet-based platforms and portals has ushered in a paper-less era, wherein every organization is shifting from physical material to virtual one. Consequently,  the felling of trees for manufacturing paper has mitigated to a great extent, allowing rewilding of denuded areas. To corroborate, as per the European Environment Agency, countries like Switzerland, Germany  and France have been able to restore forests due to fall in demand for paper in recent years.   

However, one does encounter certain challenges while relying on the information available online. It is many times not authentic - by virtue of being unsolicited - and thus, often misleading and unreliable. Likewise, there are chances of redundant inputs - that might be too old to be relevant - being supplied to the information seekers, exposing them to unwarranted situations. 

To conclude, storing and deriving information from online sources can be beneficial and does afford greater merits than pitfalls by virtue of being a convenient and environmentally friendly method: its utility can be optimized provided one uses it prudently.  

In some countries the use of bicycles is decreasing as people prefer other means of transport. Why is this happening? What can be done to encourage the public to use bicycles more?

In some countries the use of bicycles is decreasing as people prefer other means of transport. Why is this happening? What can be done to encourage the public to use bicycles more?

Nowadays, disenchantment  from cycling is becoming a ubiquitous phenomenon, owing to the growing popularity of modern means of commuting. This trend seems to stem from umpteen factors, and there are some plausible steps which could make this medium more common. 

To start with, one of the primary reasons is lack of infrastructure. This is to say, there is a dearth of  designated roads, or guided tracks for pedaling, which not only incites fear of accidents, but also dissuades many from opting for this medium. Moreover, cycles are exorbitantly expensive, making these unaffordable for a majority, especially for those hailing from middle and lower income  groups; consequently, a growing number are abandoning this humble mode. To corroborate, a recent survey revealed that many are disappointed by the rapidly incrementing prices, and hence, causing a disenchantment from these vehicles among them.  

Having said that, a lobby strongly suggests that governments should don the mantle by creating separate lanes for cyclists. This will alleviate the chances of road mishaps, and motivate many to travel using this medium. Additionally, manufacturers should reduce the prices, or offer special discounts, thereby making these affordable for everyone. For example, in Japan, The Hero Automotive has introduced offers for professionals, coaxing  many to buy cycles at lower price, and encouraging them to pedal to fulfill their travelling needs. Moreover, employers could also contribute to creating an interest among their personnel to cycle to work by affording monetary inducements, in the form of bonuses, and other benefits.  

In conclusion, inadequate safety on roads for cyclists and high prices are the chief drivers of this disinterest among commuters,  and the viable ways to promote this mode of transit is reducing the cost of bicycles, and constructing proper roads for their movement.

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important, while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important, while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Nowadays, youngsters are often influenced by their peer groups, some say that it is important and offers several benefits, while others enumerate detriments, making it imperative to assess whether the former is outstripped by the latter. 

To begin with, individuals are often influenced by their peers and at times try to follow their footsteps. This practice offers umpteen advantages: one gets a reality check and they step out of their own dreamy world. In a recent published article by John Bravo, professor at University Of Melbourne, states that the influence of acquaintances works like a wonder for those procrastinating at their work at school, office, home.

Furthermore, it boosts confidence and forces one to put more effort, resulting in better performance. In Bluebells International School, Delhi, the pupils scoring less in the formal institution are made to sit with the ones excelling: this practice has had a favorable impact on the former; their scores start to climb from very next term exams.

On the contrary, some believe this practice carries numerous  drawbacks as one tends to follow wrong precedents. A recent study, conducted by the government of South Africa, shows that more than 45% of college students start to drink alcohol, smoke weed as they are influenced by their seniors and this habit stays with them life long. Additionally, this creates stress and anxiety among young individuals, hampering their mental and physical well being. More than 65% of young people suffer from stress and headache in their school due to this phenomenon.

In conclusion, peer pressure is considered to be fruitful; disadvantages of this engagement fail to eclipse rewards fetched by such influence even though it is necessary to counsel the youth to ensure that they do not go astray.   

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

The most prominent challenge in migrating to a new country is the linguistic barrier that poses immense complications in various manifestations. Some accord with this notion, while others dissent. 

A school of thought assumes that settling in an alien environment without the knowledge of local language affords several impediments: immigrants find it hard to settle down; they are unable to interact with peers, and cannot share their thoughts with friends, teachers and employers, adversely impacting their performance. Also, this endeavor makes it difficult to find a job; lack of compatibility with native tongues is usually deemed unwelcoming by the corporates. For instance, Quebec in Canada only accepts job applications from the aspirants who embrace the French language because the majority of the population is of French descent. 

Moreover, this hurdle stimulates the imbroglio that impedes them from enjoying their basic needs like grocery shopping. To exemplify, a survey conducted in Russia revealed that sixty percent of the locals did not comprehend the worldwide accepted language: English, and promoted their language,  which  proved to be a stumbling block for new entrants to Russia, depriving them of opportunities to explore the new surroundings freely. 

Nevertheless, the former view holds little relevance today when technological advancement has ushered a paradigm shift: facilities, like google translator, help interpret any language into the host dialect. These afford comfort and convenience to immigrants. Similarly, systems like google maps and GPS help people to navigate directions seamlessly, eliminating dependence on external intervention. Additionally,  those relocating to new environments enthusiastically prepare and accept different challenges that come their way. 

To conclude, undeniably, there are several problems while migrating to societies using unfamiliar dialects, but technological evolution has aided in transcending difficulties posed by such endeavors, easing up the process of adapting to new environments.

Developing countries should be encouraged to implement high tariffs to grow their local industries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ielts essay

Developing countries should be encouraged to implement high tariffs to grow their local industries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ielts essay

In recent years, imposing high tariffs on imported goods and services has become a common suggestion for underdeveloped nations, to protect the domestic industries. While this arrangement seems feasible, governments must act prudently to circumvent its adverse impact.  

To start with, economists assert that levying high tariffs can help the infant factories survive in a competitive world; they lack capital, raw material, cheap labour and a proper scale to do the business. Likewise, it also encourages customers to buy local products; products, sourced from other parts of the world, will become more expensive, resulting in building home-grown brands. For example, India levied tariffs on automotive a few years ago, precipitating setting up its own manufacturing unit of Hyundai and Maruti, now the top selling brands for vehicles. In addition, it also generates employment opportunities, boosting the economy of the country.

Nevertheless, the skepticals term it as a recipe for disaster; other countries will also retaliate by deploying similar charges, leading to trade wars and strained international relations. For example, USA and Canada tariffs attack is one example of retaliation, where both countries ended up putting their own taxes, resulting in a downfall of imports, and promoting international tensions. Apart from that, if local businesses are always protected by this approach, they may lose motivation to do better, provide excellent quality, and to innovate. Also, there are more chances to increase the prices of local products due to lack of variety.

In hindsight, I think there is nothing bad in imposing levies on merchandise, brought from other nations, to protect native companies as it can help eradicate unemployment and bring wealth to the country, but regimes should be cautious while applying such a policy as it might adversely impact the financial growth in the long run.

It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
or,  
It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree 

• Finishing education before raising a family has a profound impact on future life: it can smoothen the things and allow one to focus on career and family

• Financial stability and independence: stable employment and lack of dependence on others for completion education     

• Emotional maturity that allows one to act prudently and handle complications related to marital life effectively  

Disagree 

• Early companionship can help each other grow and support 

• One does not have to worry about gaining professional success to settle in life

• If family support is there 

• This may help in raising family at appropriate time, before women face pregnancy-related complications

As per the common perception of contemporary times, entering into marriage before finishing the education is an unwise move, for it is likely to impede professional and personal growth. I largely concur with this notion since one must be through with their academic obligations to ensure long-term stability.

Marrying ahead of the culmination of studies and gaining employment can make one vulnerable to disruptions in attempts to successfully accomplish educational and professional objectives. This can distract individuals from pursuing college or university whole-heartedly since one, especially women, is likely to be overwhelmed by familial obligations - negotiating household chores, or caring for children, leaving them with little time to focus on  engaging effectively with academic pursuits. Consequently, they are likely to be deprived of getting jobs that promise monetary and professional progress. For instance, as per Daily Mirror, a majority of successful professionals admit that despite being in a relationship, they delayed fulfillment(consummation) promise to wed before obtaining relevant degrees and suitable employment. 

Similarly, although some might say that married couples can support each other emotionally, this is a misplaced notion/belief/supposition; one needs to be mentally mature and have emotional resilience to attend success in marital life. This can be achieved only after the completion of academic innings and settling in gainful employment because this can afford necessary exposure and adequate monetary resources to support family, and overrule any feeling of regret. To corroborate, as per ONS, Great Britain, couples settling in marriage after gaining adequate qualifications and good jobs experience  negligible divorce rates. 

In hindsight, I vehemently opine that committing to marital relationships post-culmination of education and obtaining suitable jobs is a prudent choice: this allows one to ensure their academic, occupational and familial success in the long run.

Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology?

Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology?

Concurrent times have been a witness to rising dependence of business on high-tech gadgets, altering the entire procedure of performing tasks. This essay will discuss the phenomenon of how innovation has transformed work culture along with pitfalls of indiscriminate leaning towards newly introduced methods.

To begin with, availability of sophisticated gadgets in offices, workshops and factories   affords umpteen benefits; these have ushered in a great relief to personnel as, now, they are performing smart work by providing commands to robots such that tasks are achieved effectively and quickly. Such situations are witnessed in warehouses, especially where automated machines are moving the bulky load, with little human intervention; consequently, mitigating the stress of negotiating onerous jobs. Moreover, undeniably, recent technological interventions have also helped ensure safety and security at work since now machines are being used in negotiating the tasks that are fraught with hazards, thereby helping evade  fatalities to which workers were vulnerable to in the not so distant past.  

However, despite affording certain benefits, this change has resulted in downsides. Counting completely on this, although state-of-the-art and affording unprecedented convenience,   unconventional phenomenon is persuading sedentary lifestyles that are causing diseases such as metabolic syndrome, obesity, stroke and many more. Moreover, lack of job security brought in by this revolution is a prominent drawback since automation and artificial intelligence have superseded human labor. As per researchers, the majority of jobs globally have been taken over by self-propelled machines and this arrangement is bound to become ubiquitous in future, which is likely to give rise to joblessness and hence trigger poverty.

In hindsight, businesses are embracing  technology as it provides fruitful outcomes along with comfort. Nevertheless, too much dependence on it is likely to prove counterproductive as many will be prone to lifestyle ailments and unemployment.   

An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What are the problems associated with and some possible solutions?

An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What are the problems associated with and some possible solutions?

Nowadays, a bizarre trend has been observed where qualified working professionals are migrating to other developed countries in search of better working conditions. There are umpteen problems associated with it, but there are also viable solutions to mitigate its impact. The upcoming paragraph will assess this critically and share a plausible conclusion.

To commence with, one of the major challenges is that the exodus of skilled manpower can engender steep shortage in the industry. Due to this, remaining professionals, like doctors, engineers and teachers, to name a few, raise their fees, making it unaffordable to many, especially the deprived. For instance, as per the WHO report released in 2024, in countries like Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Nepal, and so forth, the number of specialists has drastically dwindled; the existing doctors have raised their fees by seven times, making it difficult for locals to afford it. Furthermore, with the brain drain, the innovation will be hampered and halted, directly or indirectly affecting the local economy.

There are some possible solutions that can help stem this trend: improved working conditions, better compensation, creating better infrastructure that supports employment creating industries and sectors, among others, can go a long way in convincing the talent to refrain from migrating outwards. In a recent survey, John Bravo, a reporter, asserted that one million individuals agreed to not leave their jobs in Vietnam, when their working conditions were improved and they were provided with umpteen amenities. Moreover, providing chance for research and development can aid in mitigating this problem

In conclusion, although the number of professionals moving towards other countries is soaring, this can be halted by providing better amenities, improved working conditions, not over burdening employees with work, and providing them with ample time to balance their work and life.

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

 Many believe that testing done on animals is wrong, so it should be banned; however, others say that for great scientific discoveries these undertakings should be continued. I fail to subscribe to the notion of proscribing such clinical trials, for these hold critical importance for society. 

To commence with, there are umpteen great discoveries being made only due to the research done on animals. To corroborate, the invention of great medicines such as paracetamol, savlon, and crocin, to name a few, has only become possible after these were first tried on rats. In an interview, Aditya Kapoor, a doctor, at AIIMS Delhi, asserted that before the launch of any new medicine its effectiveness is checked on mice, and only after that it is released for human consumption.  

Similarly, several cosmetics like cleanser, toner, foundation, concealer, and many more, have their implications checked on animals first, if the test is successful, only then it is recommended for use by consumers. On top of that, the trials are not done on endangered species, as many are aware about their significance, it is only practiced on monkeys and rodents, among others, that are treated as pests and killed or poisoned in millions every year.  Furthermore, by virtue of being the supreme inhabitants, no experiments can be done on humans; the only option left is animals. 

Despite the advancement in state-of-the-art tools, there are not any other options available which can aid in discoveries. The researchers practicing at labs have failed to find any other option to try their experiment.

In conclusion, the trials done on animals are justified as there are no other alternatives available. Moreover, these experiments resulted in the launchment of several medicines, cosmetics which have proved to do wonders in human life.

Tobacco and alcohol are drugs that cause addition and health problems. Should they be made illegal? Or should all drugs be legalized?

Tobacco and alcohol are drugs that cause addition and health problems. Should they be made illegal? Or should all drugs be legalized?

A school of thought states that drugs like tobacco and liquor should be banned as these lead to addiction which is difficult to reduce. The following paragraphs will state reasons to justify proscribing these products.

To commence with, alcohol can significantly affect the mental and physical well-being of individuals; consuming these products makes users impulsive and hamper their productivity as well. For instance, an experiment conducted by John Bavo, a doctor at AIIMS, Delhi between two groups, one that consumed alcohol and others who did not. It was revealed in the test that the former group was not able to accomplish the task on time and depicted aggressive behavior, whereas the latter showed an assertive approach and completed the task before time.

Furthermore, substances such as tobacco contain harmful ingredients such as carbon oxide; using these for a longer period of time will create health problems: cancer, liver failure, heart disease, and so forth. A recent published article, The Times Of India, stated that eight out of ten individuals consuming cigarettes were prone to lung disorders which are impossible to cure by medicines. 

Having said that, drugs should not be allowed at all, as these cause addiction, and an increment in crimes committed by the addicted. To corroborate, when one consumes these substances even in small amounts, they are emboldened, lose their sense of direction, and harm others, leading to sometimes fateful outcomes. In a report, revealed by Delhi police, it was shown that after consuming narcotics such as heroin, almost every user acts dangerously, and jeopardizes the safety of others.    

In conclusion, alcohol and cigarettes should be outlawed as these cause immense harm to not only those consuming these but also others around them, besides resulting in lower productivity and health complications. 

Nowadays we can see definite signs of surplus production in almost every industry sector, and this is leading to environmental damage. What are some possible solutions to this situation?

 Nowadays we can see definite signs of surplus production in almost every industry sector, and this is leading to environmental damage. What are some possible solutions to this situation?

Lately, industries have been resorting to surfeit manufacturing, provoking exploitation of natural resources, and engendering environmental damage. In order to control this alarming circumstance, industry experts and environmentalists have recommended several solutions at the production end.   

To combat the challenge, the environmentalists have come up with a proposal wherein the authorities will have to play the role of a regulator: imposing limits on how much a unit can churn out in a given season. To see this through, these experts feel penalizing non-compliance can act as a mechanism that will compel manufacturers to fall in line and abide with the established norms. 

Additionally, following a uniform pricing policy throughout the year, regardless of the time and season can  go a long way in seeing the success of attempts to discourage overproduction, for customers will tend to resort to a uniform shopping habits, making accurate predictions possible, and preventing surfeit manufacturing. Likewise, some even fancy halting innovation and proscribing introduction of fresh styles and models to allow exhaustion of already manufactured merchandise stocks. Most brands, especially in fashion and electronics segments, in order to sustain supremacy over rivals launch new models frequently, leaving humongous stocks of old goods.      

Similarly, some mandate involvement of businesses in this endeavor by stemming the lack of coordination between sales and production departments that is promoting this evil phenomenon.  Where the former attempts to flood markets with products to gain greater visibility, try to bloat their estimates, pushing the latter to produce more than what can be sold, leaving huge unsold stocks, but synchronizing operations could help resolve  this issue. 

Overall, there are myriad ways to surmount this: ranging from installing manufacturing caps, adopting punitive measures and even prohibiting new introductions to stipulating participation by commercial entities through prudent production policies.   

   

Over the last few years more and more students enroll in universities. This situation creates competition among individuals. Do you agree or disagree? Is it a good or a bad development?

Over the last few years more and more students enroll in universities. This situation creates competition among individuals. Do you agree or disagree? Is it a good or a bad development?

In concurrent times, university education epitomizes advanced learning that promises quick success, but also a struggle, with a growing number vying for a place in university courses, exposing aspirants to both rewards and certain pitfalls. 

With the progression, the world has seen a rise in the number of job opportunities in almost all fields: from science, technology, space, agriculture to even sports.  This has resulted in the need and demand of people taking education as the main element for growth, which as per many, only varsities can impart. Consequently, there has been a huge influx of students competing to enroll in one of such institutions. 

This rising competition and the desire to succeed in life has given rise  to new challenges. Students and even professionals - intending to enroll for a university course - might suffer due to the unwarranted pressure created by demanding requirements and prerequisites for gaining entry into varsity, foregoing  family commitments and many other issues. This is giving rise to mental trauma which, in some cases, can be fatal, but prudent counseling can help surmount this impediment effectively. 

Having said that, there are benefits galore of this phenomenon: those competing for a place in the programs offered by the varsities tend to also prepare for tougher times ahead, they are likely to become vulnerable to, when they join professional domains of their choice. Burning midnight  oil can prepare them to be meticulous and foster mental perseverance, and weather exhausting work schedules and competition in the workplace.   

To conclude, despite the race for a place in the university courses taking a toll on personal commitments and mental health of aspiring learners, this intent helps one gear up better for a successful life: the ultimate goal of every individual.    

In some countries, children begin school at the age of four, while in others they start at the age of seven. What is the situation in your country? What do you think is the best age for children to start school? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In some countries, children begin school at the age of four, while in others they start at the age of seven. What is the situation in your country? What do you think is the best age for children to start school? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

What is the situation in your country? 

• Although the official age is 6, youngsters  are enrolled as early as they turn 4. 

• In many families both parents are working 

• Rising population has turned even the primary education competitive, and so primary schools demand some learning before the children join the formal tuition 

• Rising emphasis on play-based learning as promulgated by NEEP 

What is your opinion about the age of starting school?  

• 5-6 years 

• They can learn to carry themselves without external intervention 

• They have already mastered basic language by this time

• Emotional maturity 

• They can interact with their surroundings more meaningfully 

• Scientific evidence about improved concentration, something critical for formal learning  

• Can easily adjust to academic and extracurricular routines

Although there is a great variation about the age of starting schooling, ranging from four to seven, India has opted for between five and six, and I feel that this is a right age for enrolling into school: little ones are emotionally mature, and can carry themselves comfortably.

Indian parents, after engaging their wards in pre-schooling for a couple of years, send the latter to the formal tuition at around six because by this time, the tender minds have not only fostered fundamental cognitive skills but also the ability to interact with surroundings efficiently without needing any external intervention. They can effortlessly communicate and convey their views and comprehend instructions by virtue of developing language skills required to survive. 

Similarly, they become mentally prepared to stay away from the family environment for sometime without feeling abandoned, and requiring any special attention from the attendants or teachers. For corroborate, as per Indian Schools Association, pupils initiating their formal education between five and six have better behaviour and are less akin to throwing tantrums when compared with  their younger counterparts, that is why the Indian government has stipulated five years as basic criteria for school admissions.

Moreover, learners at this age can capitalize on their pre-school learning and smoothly adapt to academic learning and environment, and study with heightened  concentration, getting the grasp of concepts and skills faster, producing brilliant outcomes. To exemplify, Danish schools take children in at six, and report facilitating faster academic development, and producing exceptional performers in various professions, reinforcing the belief that delayed schooling supports better educational achievements. 

To recap, commencing formal education between five and six renders multiple advantages, owing to young ones being more prepared to respond to the demands of studying, and also engage in meaningful schooling.