Academic achievement at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Academic achievement  at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Academic achievement is often regarded as a reliable indicator of intellectual ability: performance at school or university is the only valid measure of intelligence .However, I firmly disagree with this viewpoint,as intelligence extends far beyond formal educational success.

Educational  institutions primarily evaluate logical reasoning,memory,and linguistic or mathematical skills. Students excelling in examinations often demonstrate strong analytical thinking and discipline. For example, individuals exhibiting their exceptional abilities in subjects such as mathematics or science are typically perceived as possessing  high levels of problem-solving ability. However, intelligence is a far broader concept than simply scoring in standardised assessments.

Many forms of intelligence are not captured by academic grading systems.According to psychologist Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligence, people may excel in areas such as musical, interpersonal, spatial,or body-kinaesthetic intelligence. A talented musician, athlete, or entrepreneur, may not achieve top academic grades, yet their abilities clearly reveal high levels of creativity, emotional understanding, or strategic thinking. To corroborate, successful business leaders often rely more on emotional intelligence, communication skills, and practical decision making than on academic credentials alone .

Moreover, conventional education often rewards memorisation and conformity, rather than originality or innovative thinking. History provides numerous examples of individuals who struggled academically but later revolutionised their fields through vision and ingenuity.This demonstrates that genius cannot be confined to formal educational performance. For instance, inventors like Edison, Einstein, and so forth, were either  average performers, or school drop-outs, but innovations brought forth by them, revolutionised the world, and today, highly-educated experts are just replicating their concepts.    

In conclusion, while academic success may indicate certain intellectual strengths, it is not the definitive measure. Intellectual capabilities are multifaceted,encompassing creativity and other factors.Judging intelligence solely on academic achievement, therefore, offers an incomplete and narrow perspective.

There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? Discuss.

There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? Discuss.

Music has always been an integral part of human life. It is a universal language that nobody needs to learn. However, it is the debatable topic which genre holds more relevance: indigenous or global. The following paragraphs intend to assess the significance of this form of art and conclude which type has more influence. 

Music is food for the soul; it helps people to express their feelings, emotions when words are not enough, or when others are not comfortable in sharing their thoughts.  It also works as therapy: alleviating stress, bolstering concentration and focus. Apart from that, it is also the best exercise for weight loss: many use it as a medium to support their dance exercise routines.

Some advocate the importance of native music; it is a symbol of local culture and heritage, which helps one to connect to their roots and know more about their traditions. A survey conducted in California University revealed that 40% of young generations sourced their knowledge about their rituals and ways of life from this form of art only either by listening, or by watching the content supporting it.

Nevertheless, some assert that universal music has been gaining traction due to technological advancements. It allows people to experience diverse types, and acts as a platform for bringing disparate ethnicities together, fostering a sense of belongingness to global ways of life and aspirations, helping build harmony by inspiring the global populace to sport a uniform expression rather than distinctiveness.   

To conclude, this form of art has always existed to support mankind in different ways, and all its genres enjoy distinct relevance; thus, comparison is irrelevant. Each music genre has their own importance, but one should always stay connected with their local music as it preserves their culture and values. 

People who decide on a career early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People who decide on a career early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is commonly perceived that choosing a professional domain at a young age and following it through life fetches more contentment than switching employment. I would analyze this notion critically and share the verdict in the following paragraphs.

To start with, those who stick to the same employment over many years tend to develop expertise in their subject matter: they foster dexterity in surmounting challenges at their work. Moreover, it provides them a sense of security in terms of job, work culture adaptation, financial stability, job satisfaction and promotions, allowing them to plan other domains of their life with more certainty. A survey revealed that nearly 45% of employees do not change their career path and they disclosed that they have been able to make good investments. 

Nevertheless, the other lobby has different opinions and asserts that there are humongous benefits of hopping jobs: one is not overwhelmed by monotony at their workplace by doing repeated tasks, and instead experience freshness, by earning themselves a chance to learn new skills. When one changes  jobs on a frequent basis, they are exposed to new work environment that persuades new learning, enhancing their industry visibility, making them industrially mobile. 

Likewise,  this can also bring a quick pay rise, and many times advancements in job positions. An interview conducted by New York Times that involved employees of Big four MNCS revealed that forty percent of youngsters aged from 26 to 31 were able to secure higher designations, including senior managers and Vice Presidents, due to versatile background experience.  

To cap it, I would say,  although deciding a career path early on is an individual prerogative, a balanced approach shall be the ideal where one can decide it by considering long term ambitions, and evolving job market. 

 

Some people believe that family is more important than friends. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that family is more important than friends. Do you agree or disagree?

Although friends and family have their own significance in life, some give precedence to the latter, making it imperative to evaluate the relevance of this perception. However, I align myself with this, and shall bolster my stand in the following paragraphs.   

To start with, a lobby strongly asserts that the family is permanent and constant. This is to say, parents and siblings stay forever and incessantly, rendering happiness, and a sense of belongingness, unlike others, however close they may be, become associated and get detached going in life many times. Moreover, mothers and fathers lay the foundation of values in their wards: cultural, life, and social, aiding in shaping the persona and future of the younger ones. For example, a recent survey revealed that people render the plinth of principles by imbibing their progeny with cultural and life traditions, thereby supporting their holistic development. 

Similarly, a group of social behaviorists propounds that families afford support, especially during the time of crises. Despite having altercations and arguments, one can find them by their side, whenever the need arises, something others cannot do: one misunderstanding can spoil relationships. Nevertheless, one can always find them close, lending hands whenever it is needed: financially or emotionally. Furthermore, elders act as a beacon of righteous path through guidance, helping one in circumventing the hideous ways; consequently, reaching success with a few errors. To corroborate, in Japan, many seek guidance from their elders before starting a new venture, eliminating the risk and chances of failure, something none can give.

In conclusion, the familial environment is extremely critical, and thus,  holds more relevance than any other relation since parents and siblings are long-lasting, are available during emergencies, and render a solid foundation of values, and invaluable learning.

  

Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The debate over achieving success being influenced by fate, or personal efforts is quite profound and fierce. While some argue that the former factor plays a crucial role in achieving goals, others contend that hard work, determination, and skills are far more important. I would like to elucidate both the views with a plausible conclusion.

Destiny, as they say,  can undoubtedly impact the path to attainments. External factors, such as being born into a supportive family, encountering the right opportunities at the right time, or meeting influential individuals, can sometimes accelerate the path to triumph. To exemplify, several accomplished entrepreneurs have had fortuitous moments where a chance meeting, or unforeseen event changed their career trajectories. In these cases, stars played a key role in striving towards objectives.

Having said that, fortune  alone is rarely enough for a majority in their endeavor towards pinnacle. One requires determination, perseverance and consistent hard work to turn the table on adversities and surmount hurdles preventing them from gaining their intended targets. Many,  such as Steve Jobs, admitted fulfilling their aspirations by preparing themselves extensively, recognizing,  and capitalizing on opportunities when they arose. 

On top of that, as per Thomas Edison, “Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration,” emphasizes that it is the efforts and hard work that enable one to realize their desires. To illustrate, athletes winning championships might experience lucky breaks, but behind their achievements are countless hours of dedication and toil.

To recapitulate, while luck can be instrumental in achieving aims in some cases, it is mostly through relentless endeavors, persistence and skills that individuals realize their ambitions. It is those who are prepared and willing to work hard make the most of the opportunities that come their way. 

People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effect does it have on an individual and on society?

People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effect does it have on an individual and on society?

Sleeping less / sleep deprivation/ depriving oneself of sleep/ shorter sleep duration/ hitting the bed later than before/ sacrificing sleep  

Causes 

• Overwhelming professional or academic obligations that keep people tied to their work for longer hours, and sometimes, they carry their work home 
• Socializing when one is free 
• Dedicating free time, that should be otherwise spent sleeping, to engaging with technology 
• Smoking 
• Sedentary lifestyle: lack of physical activity makes people prone to disturbed  
• Mental ailments such as depression 
• Noisy neighborhoods, especially those living near the main roads and clubs and party venues, suffer from this problem 

Effect 

• Lack of concentration, and Perennial drowsiness affecting productivity at work and studies 
• Makes people age faster 
• Ailments such as hypertension can afflict such people 
• Irritability that causes one to lose temperament quickly, resulting in impulsive behavior 
• Pick up fights with those around 
• Hazards while driving   

Poor work-life balance and daunting work and academic demand-led sleep deprivation has become a new normal today,  but presents myriad complications to the affected individuals and those around them.

The  primary driver of this rapidly proliferating propensity, or rather the compulsion, is meeting professional obligations within deadlines, mandating devoting extra hours at work, and even carrying assignments home. This is generally done at the cost of sleep duration - progressively shrinking considerably - and both professionals and students are prone to this circumstance. To corroborate, nearly seventy percent of urbanites world over, working or studying, complain about their jobs and education interfering with their sleeping routine.

Similarly, the urge to socialize and indulge with technology are other major sources of the motivation to stay awake longer than before. To exemplify, as per the report of the US Health department, almost every age group, across the world, is inclined to attending parties, watching television, playing computer games, and browsing social media, among others, even during wee hours, resulting in sleep deficit.

However, this behaviour is making people susceptible to unwarranted challenges:  disruptions in circadian pattern, resulting from missing sleep can severely impact physical and mental wellbeing. Sleeplessness causes weakened digestion and appetites; lack of concentration; forgetfulness and irritable attitudes, and predisposes one to ailments, like hyper-tension, and diminishing performance. These factors  also jeopardize the safety of others - road users and coworkers, impacting national productivity and health. For instance, the majority of mishaps on the roads, and in factories and offices are linked to drowsy drivers and operators.     

In hindsight, the current penchant for forgoing sleep is bolstered by overwhelming work and academic pressure, and strong cravings for socializing and technology-driven entertainment, but is having dire consequences for health and social environment, demanding quick attention, and appropriate solutions.

People working at higher levels in the companies should be paid more than the workers at lower levels. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People working at higher levels in the companies should be paid more than the workers at lower levels. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The perception that individuals working at higher-levels being paid more than lower levels evokes mixed responses. While some suggest that those placed in near to the top in hierarchical ranks bear colossal responsibilities, and thus, are deserving candidates for better compensation, but others contest.  

Employees in prominent positions typically carry extensive experience, advanced education, and specialized skills that are essential for managing departments and companies. They make strategic decisions, handle crises, and are accountable for the overall direction of the business. For example a CEO must assess market trends, manage investor relations and steer the organization towards long-term success. These tasks require significant expertise and are laden with overwhelming responsibilities, which justify higher compensation. 

Moreover, they are often vulnerable to spending longer hours at work, whether tied to their cubicles, or traveling for the sake of their organization. This takes a toll on their personal and social life, whereas those in lower positions are expected to fulfill their trade-specific responsibilities and head for home,  justifying better remuneration for those undertaking stressful endeavors. To corroborate, marketing managers often circumvent their personal and social obligations and burn midnight oil by working for extended hours, at the office or in the field. 

However, the skeptics term it as unjust; those working at lower-levels are equally relevant. They help ensure that day-to-day operations run smoothly, thereby contributing to organizational success tangibly. For instance, in a manufacturing company, production workers are directly responsible for creating the products that generate revenue. Without their contribution, even the most brilliant strategies formulated at higher levels would fail.

In conclusion, while compensating managerial personnel better is mandatory due to the complexity and responsibility involved in their roles, companies must ensure that those at lower ranks are compensated fairly; their contributions must also be acknowledged. 

Tipping is a common practice at restaurants in many countries. Some people believe tipping is a great way to show service workers you appreciate them, while others believe it should be the responsibility of the boss or company to pay their workers. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Tipping is a common practice at restaurants in many countries. Some people believe tipping is a great way to show service workers you appreciate them, while others believe it should be the responsibility of the boss or company to pay their workers. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

While some hail the customers rewarding servers in restaurants financially for their services, others believe that it is the onus of owners to compensate. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.

To start with,  a lobby asserts that rewarding waiters monetarily helps express gratitude for their work since the service industry is difficult to work in, and most are underpaid. Such gestures bolster motivation and support financially. Moreover, getting paid supplementary via customers uplifts the mood and the spirit of the staff aiding in fostering an incessant feeling of happiness, reinforcing their commitment to raise their standards of  facilitating guests. For example, a recent survey revealed that this tradition has always acted as an inducement for service staff at eateries to be meticulous and polite in their dealings with visitors

Having said that, those skeptical propound that diners are not the ones to pay extra, this obligation rests on the shoulders of the companies. This is to say, the final cheque includes the service fee, which the consumers have already paid; consequently, making it mandatory for the owners to pay it to the stewards. Similarly, the organisations in this industry are earning colossal amounts of profits, making them liable to share some with their staff in form of bonuses. This demonstrates appreciation towards the dedication of the workforce, making them enjoy their work and stay compliant with norms of serving clients.

To conclude, considering the aforementioned views, I believe tipping the server is a choice and it should not be forced on the customer, but the owners should definitely pay their personnel additionally for their unswerving devotion to their tasks.

Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become unlivable due to pollution and overcrowding. Others think technological innovation will solve these problems. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become unlivable due to pollution and overcrowding. Others think technological innovation will solve these problems. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

A general perception is emerging among the environmentally conscious that urban locales will turn uninhabitable; they are bursting to  their seams, and are plagued by pollution, but others exude optimism about the-state-of-the-art technology helping surmount these issues, turning this matter into a debatable issue. 

To start with, many feel that laden with carbon dioxide exhaust fumes from vehicles are augmenting, due to  the burning of colossal amounts of fossil fuels; consequently, the air is becoming unbreathable, precipitating respiratory ailments: asthma, lung infections and so on, and the circumstances are  likely to  exacerbate in next few years. Moreover, an ever-growing population is demanding space for accommodation, engendering a dearth of land for housing, and as things are progressing, the competition for living space is going to become steeper, making it hard  for future urbanites to afford reasonable dwelling. 

Having said that, some see  light at the  end of the tunnel, and propose that umpteen scientific and research endeavors are being undertaken to ease the pressure on cities and improve living conditions. In Japan, automobile companies are foraying into new technological realms and working on air-propelled engines, which will be cheap; and operate on renewable, and non-polluting natural material. 

Similarly, vertically-oriented buildings: skyscrapers, for residence are fast becoming a new normal in major metropolises, superseding the conventional space-intensive horizontal arrangements,  promising rendering homes to remarkably larger demography than today, without forcing policy makers and urban authorities to resort to unsustainable practice of deforestation, and helping restore greenery and mitigate pollution.  

To conclude, I believe that paranoia being promulgated by pessimism should be brushed aside;  the upcoming years seem to be holding brighter prospects, by the virtue of being fueled by technological advancements, and it can be said urban surroundings will be a better place to live in.  

Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest of our lives, while others believe that adult life brings more happiness. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest of our lives, while others believe that adult life brings more happiness. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The question of whether the teenage years, or adulthood, represent the most enjoyable phase of life has long been debated. Both periods afford unique experiences that contribute to  fulfilment, and their significance varies based on personal circumstances and priorities.

Adolescents often experience a carefree existence that is largely free from major responsibilities. With their primary focus on education, they have more opportunities for leisure, friendship and exploration. One passing through this stage is filled with enthusiasm, curiosity, and the excitement of trying new things:  hobbies, sports, or even the first romantic rendezvous. 

Furthermore, one enjoys being the center of attraction for all social gatherings, and functions, as friends of parents, relatives and cousins are keen to meet them. For instance, attending school events, or simply spending time with peers, can create cherishable memories. However, this stage is not without its challenges, including academic pressure, identity struggles, and the need to navigate emotional changes. 

Nevertheless,  adulthood offers independence, stability and the ability to make meaningful life choices. Many find satisfaction in pursuing careers, raising families, and achieving personal goals. Adults often have the financial autonomy to travel, purchase homes, or indulge in hobbies, bringing them a sense of accomplishment and contentment. For instance, successfully completing a major project at work, or raising children can bring profound happiness. However, the pressures of balancing at work, finance and familial obligations can sometimes overshadow these joys.

In conclusion, both stages offer distinct avenues for happiness, each accompanied by its own set of vulnerabilities. Adolescence thrives on the thrill of new exposures, while adulthood is often defined by a deeper sense of fulfilment through achievements and relationships. Eventually, the happiest stage depends on individual prerogatives, circumstances, and how one embraces opportunities each phase renders.

Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The  contemporary era has brought an unprecedented abundance of alternatives in every imaginable walk of life. I accede to this notion in absolute terms and shall elucidate my stand in the following paragraphs. 

One prominent area where there are surfeit options, is the availability of food, clothing and other consumer goods. Modern markets are flooded with an extensive range of products and services that appeal to diverse segments. For instance, there are myriad brands like Apple, Samsung, Redmi, selling smartphones addressing financial credentials, needs of  features and latest updates in technology. This variety, propelled by improvements in production methods, allows individuals to select goods that suit their typical requirements conveniently.  

Furthermore, those craving for diverse gastronomic experiences have everything available at their disposal. Now, they can enjoy umpteen varieties of food from all over the globe in their own hometowns. For example, brands like Subway, Dominos and chain restaurants, to name a few, have afforded alternatives to everyone, and one does not have to resign to the same monotonous nourishment routine. 

Likewise, one could not have imagined exploring several higher education programs or career paths, to suit their aspirations. Students can now study in colleges, universities and even trade-specific institutes in their home country, or abroad, to gain their desired skills without having to worry about the fee: there are institutions ranging from premier to those charging  nominally. Above all, there are employment opportunities galore in several occupations and one can access as per their qualifications and experience, and join either local or multinational companies.    

In conclusion, undeniably, there is a plentiful variety of every possible commodity and service has enriched human life and proven to be a bliss for even those who could only dream of formerly, making life convenient for all.  

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?  

A  fierce debate has ensued about experimenting on animals  because some believe that is illegal  and animals are also living beings, but some disagree. The following paragraphs will discuss this matter and share plausible conclusions and explore other  ways of this matter .

To start with, experimenting on animals it’s very harmful and painful for them. For example, as per PETA, many animals meet painful death every single year, they are injected with chemicals and substances  every day, sometimes twice or thrice in a day, and are locked in glass boxes with a dim light because this is part of their experiment. Consequently, thousands perish [die] because of these harmful experiments.  

However, experimenting on animals is not bad because they test only those species who are in huge numbers, like  monkeys, rats, dogs, guinea pigs, and so on. Every year, these animals are killed in huge numbers because they are considered their pests, and many are shot and given poison by farmers and city authorities. A study conducted by University of New South Wales, compared the number of animals killed by  farmers and those killed by  laboratories, and found that 10,000 to 1. 

Similarly,  this system is very important because there is no other way of testing medicines and surgical procedures. Several medicines tested on animals like polio,covid, and many more, have been helping to  protect human lives from disease. Moreover, many surgical procedures like liver transplant,heart transplant, brain surgery have been tested on monkeys and pigs, and then used on humans.

In conclusion, these tests are justified because there are no other ways of testing, and also the animals being used are otherwise killed in big numbers.  this should continue new technologies found that can replace it.

A staggering amount of food is wasted every year, both in business and households. Why is this happening? What can be done to tackle this problem? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

A staggering amount of food is wasted every year, both in business and households. Why is this happening? What can be done to tackle this problem?  Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Today, humongous amounts of eatables are squandered by both domestic users and commercial enterprises. The following paragraph will delve profoundly into this aspect sharing the reason behind this, and measures that can be taken to handle this situation.

To commence with, during business meetings, family gatherings, and celebrations hosts order various cuisines to impress their guests, ignoring the fact that if not eaten,  most things will be disposed of into trash cans.  Furthermore, most of the desserts such as cake, pastries, and many more, are presented in different shapes to grab the attention of buyers due to which several unsold  pieces are thrown away. In a recent article, The Times Of India, states that more than thirty percent food is thrown away because they remain unsold, and later are spoiled.

Additionally, tempting offers are available in the market while purchasing groceries. To corroborate,offers such as buy one get two free, and so forth, push customers into buying more than needed, which are of  course  never used, and end up in garbage. As per a recent study by John Bravo, professor at University Of Melbourne, in Australia, more than fifty percent of edible products sold through alluring schemes are wasted.

Nonetheless, there are a myriad of measures available that can be embraced for resolving the problem: spreading awareness through campaigns and social media. To exemplify, audiences can be targeted with posts on platforms like facebook and instagram. Moreover,  regimes can pose a hefty penalty on those who trash uneaten items. Above all, food banks can be created to prevent squandering edible goods.

In conclusion, large amounts of food wastage can be reduced by increasing awareness as lack of knowledge is the reason behind this, and imposing fines on offenders, and donating it to the needy.

In marriages today, some argue that it is the responsibility of both spouses to earn a living for the family.

In marriages today, some argue that it is the responsibility of both spouses to earn a living for the family.

Yes

• When there is a talk of gender equality in every sphere of life, why should this duty be left to only one gender 
• Millions are spent on educating women and empowering them, so they must also use their knowledge for the betterment of their kin. 
• The current era when the family system is influenced by nuclear settings, it is difficult to make ends meet without both the partners sharing the responsibility. 
• The cost of living is rising in every manifestation: education, accommodation, and so on which cannot be met with a single earning member 

NO

• Conservative approach relies heavily on the predefined duties: men are begetters and women are meant to rear the offspring and look after household chores 
• Both spouses should not work as it can affect the children adversely: the duties should be shared one looking after the earning and the other the family obligations 

Even though dual-income households might seem more practical to some today, I fail to concur with this system; it is bound to precipitate unwarranted challenges. 

Those advocating this suggestion base their argument on the perceived gender equality. They profess that when both sexes enjoy similar privileges, gain comparable education, and so forth, there is hardly any rationale left to vest this duty in only one spouse, generally males, to strive to support their family single-handedly. Sharing the burden of earning livelihoods can render respite to earning members, and contribute to comfortable lifestyles. 

Moreover, investing millions into educating and empowering women has become a new normal, making it imperative for them to work to help their kin make their ends meet. This would not only allow them to use their education meaningfully but also help ensure better standards of life, and a secure future for their progeny. However, these benefits are ephemeral, and carry challenges obscured from immediate view.  

Nevertheless, this perception is fraught with complications: affording quality upbringing to children becomes onerous; both parents face time constraints when it comes to spending time with their offspring, making the latter go astray due to inadequate monitoring and counselling: a common malady plaguing juveniles today. Additionally, marital discord is another ramification of this approach; spouses rarely spend time with each other owing to long working hours, thereby straining relationships. As per  Office for National Statistics, steeply rising incidence of divorces among working couples are attributed to married partners not devoting attention to aspirations of each other.  

In hindsight, disputes aside, notwithstanding the short term gains, in terms of rendering financial stability, this approach is destined to engender disruption in familial relationships and unfavorably impact rearing of the next generation, something that could have enduring impact on families.   

Subjects at schools are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Subjects at schools are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

A meticulously  curated study plan plays a vital role in the  holistic development of learners, and this responsibility has traditionally been shouldered by state-backed bodies due to the uniformity it renders. However, some suggest that such an initiative should be handed over to the educators, but I disagree with this view and lend my support to the continuation of the current system.   

Teachers usually have time constraints as a virtue of myriads of reasons: completion of the syllabus, preparing pupils for both interschool, as well as intraschool competitions, maintaining administrative records, and to name a few, and meanwhile, if such work were allotted to them, this would affect the teaching-learning process. In addition, due to lack of updated data and handouts, there will be complete failure to sensitize the creative minds.

Moreover, there will be major variations in syllabus, and learning methods, in many regions across institutions within the nation, hampering the future goals, and career opportunities, of young learners in higher education, and professions. For example, if schools do not impart computer science, and artificial intelligence at the school level since some educators failed to determine its relevance, learners may encounter challenges in enrolling in their dream jobs.

Furthermore, some invest their complete faith in national authorities, by virtue of them being equipped with the sufficient dexterity , and resources to provide standardized education. Likewise, the policy makers can decide to incorporate several subjects based on future economic demands that will not only help futuristic expertise but also render a clear direction to the young generation.  

In conclusion, although educators are the main source of delivering lessons, and comprehending the needs of their students better, to maintain consistency and fairness in the education, the onus of defining the formal syllabus should remain with central organisations.

Some people say that cities are a better place for children to grow up in, while others believe the countryside is the right choice. Discuss both views; give your own opinion and examples.

Some people say that cities are a better place for children to grow up in, while others believe the countryside is the right choice. Discuss both views; give your own opinion and examples.

A few experts believe that urban locales are the best for upbringing young ones, while others opine that rural areas are better options for this task. I believe both have their own significance, and this essay will delve deeper into both opinions. 

To begin with, there are umpteen reasons for several families selecting metropolitans for rearing their wards:  the latter are exposed to better education facilities, the most crucial part of the growing up process. There are numerous options for schools, colleges and universities that afford ample courses to select from  according to individual leanings and anticipated future goals, unlike in the rural area where there are limited educational institutions. Not only this, one can find better academic support framework to bolster the abilities of youngsters such as libraries, private tuitions and museums, to name a few.  

Above all, one cannot forget that by virtue of being predisposed to people from diverse backgrounds, young individuals can garner a better and broader world view, and learn about interaction with others. Most urban youngsters enjoy an invincible lead of their rural counterparts when it comes to communicating with other ethnicities, something considered quite critical in the globalized world.   

However,  growing up in the country also has numerous advantages like young ones can learn to be more empathic, and foster a  strong   sense of community since they live in areas that have small populations, and  everyone is familiar with each other, which lets youngsters foster a sense of cohesion and also cooperation. Moreover, villages offer healthy surroundings; they have fresh and clear air. 

To conclude, even though both aspects have their own benefits, I personally believe that urban settings offer opportunities galore for better education and polishing interactive skills: two pivotal factors driving success in the modern world. 

 

Some people believe that watching TV is bad for children, while others claim it has positive effects for children as they grow up. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that watching TV is bad for children, while others claim it has positive effects for children as they grow up. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with a view that watching television could have a negative influence on young minds, while others believe that this could be beneficial. It is, however, quite prudent to encourage engagement with this medium, but there should be some limits. 

A lobby propounds that juveniles become vulnerable to umpteen ailments due to such engagement: eye fatigue, back pain and so on, by virtue of looking at the screens, irreversibly affecting their physical wellness, and precipitate serious and enduring repercussions that extend well into adulthood. To corroborate, in Japan, many youngsters report suffering from incessant back pain due to poor posture while watching TV. Moreover, this electronic device is addictive, forcing one to stay glued to the content being broadcasted prolonging engagement; consequently, making them unproductive and hampering their cognitive development. 

Nevertheless, a group strongly asserts that all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. Watching television could have positive effects on tender minds since  it could act as a medium to vent out their stress, help them relax and rejuvenate by earning a  break from their mundane overburdened school work. This aids in holistic development of minds where both work and recreation can be balanced, especially in times when outdoor endeavors are increasingly becoming rare for young ones. 

Furthermore, the TV programs can bolster knowledge of youngsters. There are several channels showcasing informative topics, which could aid in broadening horizons: documentaries, news, quizzes, and many more. For example, a recent survey revealed umpteen young individuals watch The Discovery channel to expand their knowledge, enhancing their general awareness about a plethora of topics. 

In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, I believe that excess of everything is bad, the same goes for the television too. As this invention could cause addiction and diseases, and hence it should be used within limits.

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A few individuals argue that regimes should bear the cost of maintaining and expanding road networks, while others feel that this expenditure needs to be borne by motorists. This essay will elucidate both the viewpoints and draw a well-reasoned conclusion.

To begin with, people who feel that motorists are the one who should be bearing all the expenses for road maintenance, profess that those using their own vehicles are the primary users of roads and are in minority, so why should others pay for facilitating them. Across the world, only twenty five percent of the population travels by their own means, and cause traffic snarls, precipitating inconvenience to others. Thus, these  individuals should  don the mantle of bearing this expenditure.   

Similarly, when they bear this cost, they will act more responsibly towards public networks and embrace rules and regulations more diligently.  Moreover, this system will reduce the number of vehicles used in the cities since many will be dissuaded from bearing extra cost of operating their own conveyance. Consequently, this will lead to reduction in pollution and traffic congestion on roads.

Nonetheless,  the other school of thought feels that it is fair to say that authorities should be bearing this cost since drivers are already paying extremely large amounts of taxes like carbon tax, road tax, toll tax and fuel tax. to name a few, and bearing this additional levy will over burden them. This lobby suggests that money raised through various charges  should be used to sustain and expand motorways.  

To conclude, even though both have equal responsibilities towards this endeavor, I personally believe that, regime needs to bear this cost since car owners always pay several taxes and charging them more will be unfair. 

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

Surviving in an alien environment without knowledge of local language can pose severe hurdles in various paradigms: 

• Knowing about local customs and ways of life can become a difficult job; thus, never allowing migrants to effectively integrate with surroundings 
• Youngsters find it harder to settle down since they are unable to mingle with their native peers and often are subjected to slur 
• Finding work can become an extremely arduous job 
• Surviving in alien surroundings can be an onerous task: finding directions, knowing about places 

No issues arise today   

• Virtual interpreters can help a great deal in overcoming linguistic barriers. 
• Systems like GPS and google maps can help people find directions
• Migrants go well prepared to handle such issues and try to overcome the barriers using their intellect with enthusiasm   

It is often perceived by many that people face severe hurdles as immigrants to a country, due to lack of linguistic compatibility, but the other lobby dissents with this notion. I will analyze this matter profoundly,  and share a plausible conclusion.

Many seek better opportunities in an alien environment, but stumble across myriad challenges; they find it hard to adjust themselves in the surroundings such as, neighborhoods, universities and employment, to name a few, as the local community avoids favoring them since lack of knowledge of local tongue fuels distrust. To exemplify, a survey conducted by an eminent professor Dr. John, in New Zealand, states that native students enrolling in universities receive more benefits in academic and professional domains, whereas the foreigners are overlooked. 

On top of that, individuals in their early days encounter impediments while locating, and finding directions to fulfill their basic needs: for example, grocery stores, bus and train stations, and so on.  Likewise, it is seen in many areas that new entrants hesitate to ask for help and directions, making things complicated. 

However, the former view holds little substance today; the advancement in technology is making the life of the immigrants convenient. In contemporary times, there are umpteen applications that allow users to operate while they are in a new country. For instance, they can now get the directions on GPS and travel to any area; get groceries at doorstep just by using doordash, or uber without visiting stores; book cabs for pickups; and use language translator to understand directions, and what others say effortlessly, among others.  

In hindsight, I vehemently opine that using gadgets and modern tools can help surmount the challenges in foreign societies due to lack of knowledge of native tongue. Therefore, this view cannot be upheld  

The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 It  is often seen that many managerial positions in the workplace are held by old people, whereas the other lobby suggests that youngsters should populate such designations. The following essay will delve deeper into this matter in the following paragraphs, and share a plausible conclusion.

There are myriad benefits of  having a young manager: most have just cleared their academics, gained knowledge with up-to-date scientifically proven leadership techniques, and are willing to use modern resourceful methods, bringing in a fresh approach to management. To exemplify, a study by an eminent  professor of New York, Dr. Bran states that the companies that place the young professionals on top ranked posts enjoy better prospects due to radical business policies being implemented by these management experts; they apply  innovation, work hard, and are aware of  the contemporary market requirements. 

Similarly, these managers tend to act inclusively and persuade participation of every personnel since they themselves deploy their efforts in every endeavor and lead from the front, instead of sitting back and passing orders, compelling every worker to emulate. They are often cited as being friendly and approachable by their subordinates, which the latter feel comfortable about discussing their queries, and seek resolutions.   

However, the other lobby professes that inexperienced supervisors cannot effectively deliver in leadership roles, this is the domain of those holding profound experience in effectively dealing with unexpected chaos and hurdles that comes with age. For instance, a survey conducted by a corporate magazine proves this view: entities being led by managers of old age are more prone to surmounting issues quickly, by virtue of carrying extensive seasoning.  

In hindsight, I disagree with this arrangement to have the young individuals for management positions as they lack experience and attitude required for the productive output.

In some areas of the US, a ‘curfew’ is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. What is your opinion about this?

In some areas of the US, a ‘curfew’ is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. What is your opinion about this?

Unaccompanied after dark outdoor endeavors of teens have been proscribed in the United States citing the vulnerabilities facing this section of demography, but it fails to convince me since this one size fits all policy will do more harm than good by impeding the privilege of free movement.

A lobby assumes that since the crime against juveniles is soaring, such restrictions are mandatory to protect teens from evil doers: mugging, assault and so on, for they are easy targets  for deviant elements. Moreover, such limitations also encourage the young minds to focus on their studies by staying at home and devoting time to broaden their horizons and career prospects: most of them  are  in high school, a crucial juncture that could define their future as adults. For example, in California, since adolescents are under the curfew during night, they utilize this time to study, aiding them in enhancing their academic performance. 

However, a group asserts that the government is encroaching the right to movement for individuals through such curbs. One cannot limit the movement of teens since it is their birthright to act freely in a democratic country whether with, or without adults. Furthermore, many are engaged in part-time jobs, especially in evenings, in order to repay their educational loans. Such an arrangement will incapacitate many from paying off their debts. To corroborate, a recent survey revealed that university pupils work at night to allow them to repay their study loans, and  this system could deprive them of such opportunities.

In conclusion, unlawful activities will be committed even if teenagers are accompanied by adults, making it imperative to lift the embargo immediately, and it should not be forced in other cities, or nations - except in locales prone to crime after dark - in the future since many students settle their debts by engaging in nightshifts.

It is better to buy just a few expensive clothes, rather than lots of cheaper clothes. Do you agree or disagree?

It is better to buy just a few expensive clothes, rather than lots of cheaper clothes. Do you agree or disagree?

A general perception is emerging that purchasing minimum premium clothing instead of a plethora of low-priced alternatives. Although I believe both sides hold substance, I tend to favour the high-valued clothes.

Some assert that exorbitantly priced attires are of finest quality, are long-lasting owing to the workmanship invested into these, eliminating the need for recurring shopping. Moreover, by donning such ensembles, one can achieve opulence and be influential among peers, and hence, leaving an impression where just with a few pieces can make them look and feel elite. For example, when asked during an interview on national television, many showed support for the attire costing several arms and several legs since this impacted their social persona favorably. 

Similarly, this practice is often compared to sustainable practices. This is to say, everyday piles and piles of dirt cheap clothes are being dumped in landfills, causing serious damage to the environment: soil degradation; they are non-recycleable items. To corroborate, in Japan, over the last decade, there has been an enhancement in the quality of soil since many have curtailed the usage of cheap outfits and supported costly wear.

Furthermore, manufacturing a large amount of clothes puts pressure on the resources and burns a colossal amount of fossil fuel: clothing is only material that cannot be recycled but is vulnerable to redundancy owing to changing vogues. Nonetheless, If people buy a handful of couture and avoid unnecessary shopping for a multitude of cheap clothes; consequently, alleviating the usage of natural resources, which are limited and precious. 

Nevertheless, a group hypotheses that clothing acts as a medium to express creativity, especially among youngsters, who have limited money but want to be fashionable: following such a  propensity would engender inequality, and put many at a disadvantage. Also, some tend to purchase a variety of discounted clothes, for everyday use and avoid repeating the previous outfit. However, this can be countered by convincing them about getting one quality attire for the sake of the planet. 

In conclusion, disputes aside, buying limited costly outfits is a sensible approach since they are long-lasting, helps one attain an impressive social facade, and also aids the environment.