“Prevention is better than cure”. Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

 “Prevention is better than cure”. Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

While a school of thought firmly believes that the majority of public spending should be creating awareness about circumventing illnesses rather than combating them. I will delve into this matter profoundly even though I feel this should be a joint responsibility.

An army of people proposes that traditionally, people have had at least to take a week off from their respective workplace in order to ensure their speedy recovery from the wellness demanding an expensive healthcare intervention; ranging from diagnosis to their treatment. Besides this, they will not be able to contribute towards economic productivity. However, if citizens know about taking precautions they will be able to sustain their well-being, and not only it will help in saving public money but also pay taxes by working leading to lesser loss of economy and better  public health index. 

Nevertheless, despite this proposal presenting certain benefits, it seems short-sided. One cannot ignore the impact of stressful lifestyles people are living in the contemporary times and even by following healthy regimes their healthy lifestyle is affected by overwork and lack of time to focus on their health and also their diet; consequently, they are being affected by lifestyle diseases like diabetes-2 and hypertension which needs necessary medical intervention. Likewise, aged people cannot predict the autonomous diseases they will be inflicted with and will require compulsory medicinal and treatment support. For example: disorders like arthritis, weak vision, lack of mobility and so on, affect everybody and only medicines can provide relief from such conditions.  

In hindsight, undeniably, creating awareness about  staying away from disease and ailments can potentially help society, but laying more emphasis on it instead of treatments can prove to be disastrous. Thus, I feel that  both the preventive and combat methods should be prioritized. 

Some people believe that tourists should be responsible for protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that tourists should be responsible for protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that tourists should take the onus of safeguarding the environment of the locations they are visiting, while some believe that tourists are not as responsible as citizens and the government. I strongly believe that exploitation as well as protection of the planet is the primary responsibility of locals and policymakers; However, ,visitors should be advised to comply by environmental rules.

To begin with, environmental protection requires long-term planning, strict regulations, and proper infrastructure. Tourists usually stay in a destination for only a short period of time ,so they cannot manage complex issues such as waste disposal systems, water conservation, or wildlife protection. These matters require government policies and financial investment. Without proper facilities like recycling bins, or sewage treatment plants, even responsible tourists may unintentionally cause environmental harm.

In addition, businesses engaged in this sector earn significant profits from visitors, and thus, they should take greater responsibility. Hotels, airlines, and tour operators can adopt eco-friendly measures such as reducing plastic use, conserving energy, and limiting visitor numbers in fragile areas. Since those organizations operate for a longer period and have more resources, they are in a stronger position to protect the environment than individual travelers. Moreover, placing too many responsibilities on tourists may discourage them from traveling, which could negatively affect local economies that depend on tourism income. A balanced approach, where authorities set clear rules and regulations, and companies follow sustainable practices, would be more effective.

In conclusion, although tourists should act responsibly, they should not be held mainly accountable for environmental protection. Governments and entities involved in facilitating leisure travelers entering a region for tourism should take the leading role in ensuring sustainable development.

In education and employment, some people work harder than others. Why do some people work harder?

In education and employment, some people work harder than others. Why do some people work harder?

Is it always good to work hard?

Reasons 

• It is compulsion: to either meet family requirements 
• Meet the expectations of families 
• Fear of set backs  
• They have personal objectives to be fulfilled 
• Some cultures are indoctrinated with such a quality 
• It is an innate quality  

Why it is good?

• This helps foster and reinforce discipline,  skills and knowhow 
• This can augment confidence and contentment 
• Set benchmarks for family members and subordinates and colleagues 
• Can fetch recognition 
• Renders leverage over peers, counterparts  and rivals    

Why it is not good? 

• Can cause unwarranted stress and impact well being 
• Disrupt work-life balance 
• Makes one be labelled as apathetic 
• Hard workers can become vulnerable to exploitation 
• Sometimes people overlook the need to do smartwork 
• Over-engagement can lead to diminishing productivity   

Some individuals can be seen consistently striving in their academic and occupational realms. This can be attributed to several reasons apart from chasing personal objectives, and tends to prove to be rewarding, but the detriments associated with it can hardly be overlooked.

The most prominent stimulant for this mindset is a profound desire to fulfil scholastic and professional ambitions, coupled with the hidden fear of failure that persuades one to go an extra mile, coaxing one to remain committed to putting in continuous efforts until goals are reached. Similarly, some are compelled to invest earnest efforts in order to meet the familial requirements- in the form of better earnings, or expectations of parents through better educational outcomes. 

This ideology has a profound impact on the persona; it does not only help foster strong acumen and acquire adroitness but also inculcate confidence and mental perseverance. To corroborate, several successful personalities in disparate fields like business, sports, and research, among others, credit their accomplishments to the diligent, and persistent endeavors, they undertook to achieve the feats because their consistent toils encouraged them to stay on, garner finesse, and gain perfection.

Nevertheless, the only pitfalls presented by this approach are implications for health, for one becomes susceptible to ailments resulting out of work-related stress such as hypertension and cardiac complications; and ignoring the need to integrate smart working strategies, which can diminish productivity in the long run. However, these challenges can be surmounted by allocating time for relaxation and leisure, and regular introspection about inputs and outputs of efforts.

In hindsight, even though those putting forth significant efforts into education or work are likely pushed by desires and constraints, they are guaranteed accomplishments in their fields. However, one should judiciously steer their direction and also unwind regularly.   

Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

It is a highly argumentative topic whether investments should be made into modernising the learning system, or upgrading the teaching skills. This essay will delve deeper into varying opinions in the further paragraphs, and draw a plausible conclusion.

Spending on technology will help augment the learning process via the use of audio-visual and virtual: graphics and animation, aiding learners to grasp concepts and topics faster than the traditional methods. For instance, the concurrent generation is surrounded by technology: games, television and the internet, and enjoys a faster learning ability if they do not have to tax their imagination, bolstering them in comprehending quickly and retaining the content enduringly.  

In addition, this will render a medium to assist pupils in becoming familiarized with  the modern methods dominated by computers and the online platforms, turning them into tech literate, capable of negotiating their obligations in diverse spheres of their life: professional, social and personal, seamlessly and overcome challenges facing them in the contemporary paradigm. 

Nevertheless, spending on the faculty will transform teaching - that is fast losing its charm - into an exciting professional domain, and convince the young generation the young generation to embrace this occupation, and pursue careers opportunities in this realm easily available in colossal numbers in countries, like India, where there are not that many resources available yet to infuse technology-driven tools. Moreover, learners are more comfortable with their educators around them to clarify their doubts, share anecdotes, and assist in fostering emotional, physical stability along with meaningful learning.

In hindsight, although infusing financial resources into technology seems to be a plausible way of advancing the domain of education in the modern settings, teaching professionals must also be considered equally, for this would go a long way in equipping education with tools to negotiate emerging.  

Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Is rapid strivings for lodging development to improve quality of life causing environmental damage? 

Yes? 

• Large scale deforestation is taking place to create  spaces for farming, residential units, commercial complexes and industry - causing a loss in natural habitats: the forests act as lungs for the planet and their clearing is reducing the capability of the environment to recycle the air.  

• There is humongous pollution in all spheres of environment 

- air due to smoke from factories,  vehicles, and household 

           appliances 

- Water bodies are being polluted due to discharge of contaminated  

            water from industries, farms and households 

- plastic that is driving modern lifestyles is choking the planet

• Reckless milking of nature to fuel industry 

No 

• The recent developments in technology are ensuring improvements in environment - use of non-fossil fuel energy source is improving air quality 

• Introduction of concepts like vertical farming and vertical cities is helping restore green cover 

• Recycling is helping slow down exploitation of natural resources. 

While historically forays for economic development have led to surge in pollution and resource depletion, I believe that sustainable technologies and strict policies can significantly mitigate environmental harm, detaching further advancement from abuse of ecology.

Admittedly, as countries become more prosperous, consumption levels tend to increase. Higher incomes often lead to greater demand for private vehicles, modern housing, electricity, and manufactured goods. This surge in production and consumption can result in deforestation, air pollution, and excessive waste. For example, rapidly developing nations have experienced severe air quality issues due to industrial expansion. and increased fossil fuel usage. In this sense, economic advancement has traditionally come at the expense of the natural environment.

However, as per researchers, environmental harm is no more a consequence of improved living standards. Many developed countries have demonstrated that economic growth can coexist with environmental sustainability. By investing in renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power, efforts are being made to reduce carbon emissions while maintaining economic productivity. Furthermore, stricter environmental regulations, waste management systems, and public awareness campaigns encourage responsible consumption. Likewise,  technological innovations, including electric vehicles and energy-efficient buildings, also play a crucial role in minimising ecological damage.

In addition, the concept of sustainable development emphasises meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their ends by conserving the resources and alleviating environmental deterioration. Prioritising green policies, and ensuring businesses adopting   environmentally friendly practices, can help improve quality of life without irreversibly harming the planet.

In conclusion, although rising living standards have historically contributed to environmental problems, I firmly believe that such damage is not unavoidable. Through strategic planning, technological advancement, and global cooperation, economic development can be achieved in a sustainable and environmentally responsible manner. 

Many people believe that reducing the speed limit is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are other measures that could be put in place? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

 Many people believe that reducing the speed limit is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are other measures that could be put in place? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

In modern times, many people believe that imposing limits on speed need to be imposed to ensure the roads are safer for all. I am convinced there is no other way that could make roads safer. In the following paragraphs  I will analyze both  the merits and demerits of this method. 

Lower speeds give drivers more time to react and stop themselves from getting involved in road accidents, it would be easy for them to analyze road conditions. When motorists drive within permissible speeds, they will be able to assess the roads ahead, oncoming traffic and also any obstructions, which will allow them to take evasive actions.  For instance,  IDA, India did a comparative study over 5 years before and after implementation of speed cappings on main roads of major cities like Delhi and Bangalore and found that this policy helped bring down road mishap by almost 40 percent.

Similarly, this policy  can help ensure  prevention of mechanical failures that usually take place at high speeds.  To illustrate, it has been proven by studies conducted in Germany and other parts of Europe  that  tyre bursts and other failures linked to engines at manageable speed give drivers enough time to control and stop their vehicles.   

However, benefits aside there drawbacks too, time management can become difficult for  people, especially those having hectic schedules. Driving slowly will take more time and their  journey will be longer which will increase their stress level and irritability. Additionally,  the consumption of fuel will increase automatically when people slow down their speed causing pollution levels to rise. 

In hindsight, there is no other way to improve road safety than focusing on speed management as controlling speed will decrease the cases of accidents and people dying due to reckless speeding. 

In many countries, the legal driving age is 18 years old. Some people believe it is the right age to learn how to drive a car, whereas others say that the minimum age should be 25. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In many countries, the legal driving age is 18 years old. Some people believe it is the right age to learn how to drive a car, whereas others say that the minimum age should be 25. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In many countries, individuals are legally permitted to drive at 18, whereas some argue that the minimum age should be raised to 25 due to safety concerns. This essay will examine both perspectives before reaching a conclusion. 

Many believe that allowing people to drive at 18 is considered reasonable for several reasons. At this age, individuals are legally recognised as adults in most of the countries and are expected to take on responsibilities such as voting, working full-time, or even living independently. Driving enables young adults to commute to universities or workplaces conveniently, particularly in areas where public transportation is limited. Moreover, this privilege helps individuals gain experience at a younger age, which may eventually make them more confident and skilled drivers.

Having said that, some believe that the minimum driving age should be raised to 25 because by this age, one tends to become more and more mature, and less impulsive; most start working and tend to adopt judicious behavior, instead of responding to circumstances abruptly. However, younger drivers are vulnerable to higher chances of mishaps, resulting from their immature and restless attitude, which often coaxes them to react without considering consequences of their actions. Some researchers suggest that the human brain, especially  the prefrontal cortex. the part responsible for decision making and impulse control, continues developing until the mid-twenties. Thus, one should be permitted to drive only once they turn twenty five.  

In conclusion, while raising the minimum age to 25 might improve safety, maintaining it at 18 with better regulation seems to be a more practical solution: if one can face consequences of their unwarranted acts, participate in society as grown-ups, this right should also be made accessible.

Many people believe that eighteen years old is the appropriate age to finish school. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many people believe that eighteen years old is the appropriate age to finish school. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Education lays a solid foundation for personal and social growth globally. Some argue that it should be age appropriate: up to eighteen  years, to facilitate other important endeavours in life, while others disapprove of this. This matter, in my view, needs to be critically analysed.

To begin with, juveniles should finish their formative education at eighteen because the curriculum is designed according to the age and intellectual ability of young minds; as they grow up, they develop analytical, problem-solving and interpersonal skills, required, for their later life, in several areas like higher education, training, employment and business. For example, in India, those completing high school obtain better opportunities by attaining correct academic qualifications, and hence, can become doctors, professors, engineers, and so forth, early in their lives.

Nevertheless,  a lobby questions the former notion and believes that many in professions such as  artists or players, can pursue their desired occupations, after receiving a certain level of schooling and can successfully achieve their ambitions, so completing formal learning is not a hard and fast rule. For example, several renowned cricketers and actors work sixteen hours a day from an early stage, and rarely visit schools regularly, and complete higher secondary through distance education systems later. Similarly, not all learners grow at the same pace in academics due to differences in learning abilities, so they join family entrepreneurship, or are enrolled in vocational training, and as a result, earn better success than their schoolgoing counterparts.

To conclude, I opine that even though schooling is imperative, it should not be a norm for all; some can accomplish their goals even without completing high school. There have been several instances, wherein youngsters have earned success without visiting school for the complete tenure of twelve years.  

Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 

In contemporary times, the advancement of technology has sped up, and although  it has brought numerous benefits, it has also engendered a profound debate as some allege that this has widened the disparities between the affluent and the impoverished, while others are not in favour of the above notion. 

Many say that technological progress has resulted in greater socioeconomic inequalities. State-of-the-art technologies like automation are extremely expensive and can be only afforded by the wealthy and large companies, helping them earn bigger profits. This has put those in low-skilled jobs at a disadvantage because all their work can be done with the use of these modern equipment, thereby exposing  them to unemployment and poverty. For instance, nowadays, automobile manufacturers use robotics that helps them complete tasks faster, safely and at relatively low cost, increasing their profits tremendously, but has left many unemployed, making the latter poorer. 

However, modern technological forays have aided in promoting equality. One can work remotely from their home, or rural areas, for companies around the world, without needing to leave their hometowns and face the huge expense of shifting and surviving in other locations, enabling them to improve their financial conditions. In addition, digital payments platforms, like Phonepe, are easily accessible and free to use, allowing small vendors to enhance their outreach of their business, and thus, earnings. Moreover, anyone can create skilled, educational  or entertainment videos and upload on social media sites such as Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, and so on, and generate huge revenues without needing to invest into expensive expertise and equipment. 

In hindsight, technological progress, despite affecting some sectors of the population, has created grounds for bridging gaps between the elite and the destitute, by allowing the latter greater opportunities to boost their earnings without facing any hurdles.  

Many countries today are experiencing problems associated with noise pollution (excessive noise above a normal background noise.) What are the causes of this phenomenon, and what effects does it have on the people affected?

Many countries today are experiencing problems associated with noise pollution (excessive noise above a normal background noise).  What are the causes of this phenomenon, and what effects does it have on the people affected?

The contemporary world is facing a new form of pollution emanating from noise, primarily due to human activities such as traffic congestion, construction, loud music, and so forth. The affected populace faces physical and psychological health risks. In the following paragraph, I will discuss the reasons and how it harms individuals and society.

To commence with, the primary  cause of increased decibel levels is traffic chaos caused by cars, trucks, trains and aircraft occurring owing to horns, engine sounds, especially in urban areas. As per studies, most modern urban locales are exposed to  ceaseless deafening humming of vehicles and blaring sounds of airplanes flying over cities.  Moreover, factories and construction sites, where heavy machinery is used: generators, cranes and drilling equipment,   create intense loud sound throughout the day. Moreover, in weddings, festivals, parties and other events, people often play music at deafening volumes, making the surroundings noisy. 

Consequently, this pollution affects people profoundly in a myriad of ways, prolonged exposure to loud noise can lead to tinnitus, and later result in  loss of hearing ability, particularly the vulnerable sector, including juvenile, the elderly and pregnant women. In extreme cases, it can lead to hospitalization. Additionally, it raises stress levels and causes anxiety in every age group. In 2023, a study conducted in  Northumberland Hills hospital   found that loud noises were one of the common reasons for frustration, stress among children. Furthermore, high pitch sounds affect students detrimentally as they are unable to focus properly on their studies; consequently their grades in exams suffer.

In conclusion, noise pollution is mainly caused by transport, industrial and commercial activity, and irresponsible behavior of households, and is harmful for physical and mental well being. Therefore, governments should take appropriate action by imposing fines and making strict laws against it.

Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

A profound debate has ensued over the notion of amassing more monetary resources failing to raise happiness levels of inhabitants of already elite societies: while some concur with this notion, others reject it. 

It  is generally believed that economic growth of a nation can help the population overcome stress by being able to access appropriate health facilities, education and shelter, to name a few, seamlessly. For instance: A survey completed by WHO to list out the top five happiest nations around the world in the year 2022, they found that individuals of the wealthier countries are more satisfied than their counterparts in not so prosperous nations. Moreover, more affluence allows countries to spend more money in reseaches, especially in space, technology, and so forth,  lifting the spirits of inhabitants by affording them a feeling of leadership they enjoy over others.  

However, others oppose this notion believing a nation becoming richer, the citizens tend to remain unaffected since material wealth can only bring happiness to a certain extent, and any increment beyond a certain level does not afford a feeling of contentment as people start taking everything in their strides. Moreover, more prosperity tends to make people lazy, nonchalant  and many go astray such as engaging in drug abuse, since they are gaining all possible support from the state, and do not have anything to do. For example, a report highlighted in The New York Times in 2022 that in The USA, intoxication had increased by 10 percent in the last five decades since people were being provided basic amenities for free. 

To conclude, disputes aside,  I completely concur with this statement: wealthy countries can provide good education, health to enhance knowledge and well being, and ensure entering into forays that guarantee future leadership.  

In some countries, more and more people are hiring a personal fitness trainer, rather than playing sports or doing exercise classes. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or a negative development?

In some countries, more and more people are hiring a personal fitness trainer, rather than playing sports or doing exercise classes.  What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or a negative development?

Seeking personal training to ensure well being rather than joining sports, is becoming a vogue. This essay will explain the causes and whether it is a favorable, or an unfavorable evolution. 

The most prominent reason driving this trend is that these days many are influenced by social media celebrities and want to emulate them, so they subscribe to private training over group activities. Moreover, there is a growing perception that this can help one achieve their desired results without adjusting their busy lifestyle; this arrangement can be flexible as needed. Similarly, there are some who feel shy in group activities and cannot perform properly, and thus, seek separate arrangements. For instance, those obese turn public shy and circumvent instances where they could become a butt of jokes for others.  

This tendency has helped reap rich rewards in the realm of wellness, for most of those subscribing to these settings are able to chase their objective without distractions and constraints, and obtain quick outcomes. This has turned out to be an extremely beneficial phenomenon since even in times when time is a primary restriction due to overwhelming professional engagements, people are able to sustain their physical and mental well being.   

Nevertheless, this craving has its own shortcomings though mostly inconsequential: it is an expensive affair by virtue of trained fitness professionals being in limited supply, and can tax family budgets. To corroborate, Lebron James, an NBA player spends 1.5M USD towards his personal training, which everyone can ill-afford, causing morale of those unable to afford  such arrangement to dip.

In conclusion, the yearning for customized regimes to bolster wellness is driven by social media and dearth of time, but this has proven rewarding for a majority; thus, it is beneficial evolution. 

Some people prefer one-on-one lessons, while others like groups. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people prefer one-on-one lessons, while others like groups. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In the contemporary era, many people believe having one-on-one interactive sessions are more effective, whereas some prefer learning in a group is more beneficial. I will analyze both the views and share a plausible opinion. 

To start with, many believe that the individual classes are always considered more beneficial for pupils as there are  several requiring personalized focus and attention by virtue of being introverts. Many tend to hesitate while asking questions in group settings, whereas personalized sessions provide individual space and time to analyze things. They can present their queries and make mistakes without the fear of being judged, or becoming a butt of jokes. Apart from that, they also enjoy undivided attention from the tutor, which is without distraction. 

Nevertheless, barring a few, a majority prefer studying in the conventional classroom system as it helps them attain more knowledge from group discussions. Likewise, they tend to foster broader perspectives, owing to the chance to listen to problems facing peers, exposes students to different points of view and problem solving approaches and foster critical thinking, deeper understanding of subjects. To exemplify, a study was conducted in China during the pandemic times, that compared group sessions and individual classes, it was observed that  most students were more confident after group sessions as these helped render solutions from the mistakes of others. Moreover, classroom arrangement ensures better learning, conflict resolution, helps develop communication skills, teamwork and leadership, inculcating confidence song pupils.

In hindsight, disputes aside, one-on-one lessons are better for beginners, or students, needing extra help, while group lessons help ensure fostering cooperation and discussions.  I feel that even though it is an individual prerogative to choose either of the settings as both offer distinct benefits, it is better to be a part of classroom settings.   

More and more people are getting overweight. Some people think the government should increase the price of fattening food items to solve this problem. Do you agree or disagree?

 More and more people are getting overweight. Some people think the government should increase the price of fattening food items to solve this problem. Do you agree or disagree?

Assumption (would) if such an action taken,  

• It will dissuade consumers from opting for such things and they will have to settle for cheaper but healthier options or home cooked meals
• Manufacturers will reduce the amount of fat being used in producing food items 

Why this action should not be taken

• Blaming food will not alleviate the problem 
• It is not the food but the sedentary lifestyles that is cause of this issue so, the state must ensure that this is taken care of effectively 
• People will not abandon consumption to these items: they are forced to do so because of their overwhelming engagement with their professional and academic pursuits. Therefore, the state  must focus on providing relief to people from their over-draining schedules so that people can get some time to cook rather than buy food.  
• They should instead promote active lifestyles 
• They should instead persuade the manufacturers to reduce the fat content in their produce.

Obesity is menacing the future of society. This has prompted some to suggest that the state should intervene and make edible items that are laden with fat content, costlier to mitigate this health condition. However, others voice their dissent on this issue. 

This suggestion is founded on an assumption that expensive fattening nourishment will force people to opt for other more healthier options since such alternatives will either go out of the reach of a majority of consumers, especially youngsters, or will provide little motivation to consume such products since these items will cost as much as pricey healthy food. Most of the time people are seen consuming such items since these either are quite economical to afford, or are cashing on the desires to evade the struggle of cooking at home. However, this action will compel many to reconsider their options in favor of appropriate nutrition. 

Nevertheless, others suggest a more practical approach and are critical of this one. They predict that this policy is highly unlikely to obliterate corpulence since consumption of edible goods loaded with fat is a compulsion rather than a matter of voluntary choice. Most are pushed into buying such things: they have overwhelming work schedules and are exhausted by the time they reach home, leaving them with little energy to think about  preparing healthy meals. Moreover, it is the sedentary lifestyle from where this issue stems and not what people consume. Therefore, the state must promote healthy lifestyles and also persuade manufacturers to use healthy ingredients, instead of resorting to such impractical methods.  

Overall, the proposed policy of price hike of edible products that carry surfeit fat seems to be lacking in substance. Governments must act pragmatically and instead of punishing citizens,  they should look for more viable  options.  

Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries. Explain the main causes and effects of this problem, and suggest some possible solutions.

Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries. Explain the main causes and effects of this problem, and suggest some possible solutions.

Undeniably, there has been a remarkable increment in the number of corpulent  juveniles globally. This can be attributed to myriad reasons, but it is impacting youngsters negatively, making it imperative to find plausible remedies to combat this menace in the following paragraphs.

Health  professionals profess obese youngsters are an outcome of the sedentary lifestyle of families,  encouraging their offspring to opt for unhealthy life choices, precipitating  detrimental impact in the form of little ones gaining weight. For  instance, spending time on games and television;  and eating junk food, like burgers and cheese, to name a few. Consequently, it becomes the reason for deterioration of health. Furthermore, by virtue of being busy earning, many do not spend quality time with their wards, and give them their mobile phones to overcome isolation, instead of encouraging stepping outdoors, promoting inactive lifestyles, and precipitating obesity.  

This physical condition among young ones is quite alarming: it is exposing them to poor well being, for many are reported suffering from severe medical conditions such as diabetes, high cholesterol levels, and heart disease at a small age. Similarly, this can predispose young minds to afflictions like depression as they avoid socializing due to being body shamed.   

Nevertheless, there are plausible solutions to mitigate these problems. Enlightening  families about correct food habits and significance of physical activity for the growing individuals, can do wonders. Mothers and fathers must monitor what their little ones are consuming and ensure that they have at least one healthy meal together, and also encourage the latter to take part in sports. 

To recapitulate, I vehemently assert  parents can surmount this obesity challenge among their wards  effortlessly by persuading intake of healthy diet, and participation in physical endeavors, which will help circumvent health issues.

Many cities are replacing cars with bicycles. What are the reasons for this? Which do you think is better?

Many cities are replacing cars with bicycles. What are the reasons for this? Which do you think is better?

Nowadays, several urban locales have started opting for cycles and proscribing use of cars. This can be attributed to several causes, but when it comes deciding which of the two modes is superior is a fiercely debated issue.  

The  reasons behind this paradigm includes cars becoming a major source of traffic jams and snarls, and accidents.  Similarly,  they are a prominent source of air pollution, leading to more environmental issues. Additionally, these are encroaching pedestrian space in shopping districts, roads and residential areas, causing chaos,  making neighborhoods don an ugly look, and fueling safety concerns among pedestrians. To corroborate this, a survey revealed that 40% of pedestrian space in Toronto is occupied by the four wheelers, resulting in four to five accidents every fortnight. 

Although  cars are known to offer comfortable rides and protection from extreme weather, apart from allowing families to travel together, pedaling is incomparable when it comes to reducing the cost of creating and maintaining infrastructure; these humble two-wheelers do not stipulate an elaborate road infrastructure: less space is needed for riding and parking.  

Moreover, it is the cleanest mode of commuting as it does not produce any emissions, helping alleviate  greenhouse gas discharge, and thus, air pollution. Likewise,  it also promotes physical activity, leading to better health outcomes, and ultimately, resulting in healthcare cost reduction.  To exemplify, the city of Guelph encouraged the use of cycles by providing it for free for forty hours per week to the residents, and this initiative recorded a 40% downfall in issues related to cardio and joints. 

In hindsight, it can be concluded that cities are more cautious about environment and health. Hence, preferring and promoting the use of bicycles is justified since this 19th century invention can ensure a clean environment, and well being. 

Some believe that pets should stay at home at all times, while others feel they should be allowed outside the home. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some believe that pets should stay at home at all times, while others feel they should be allowed outside the home. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Pets should stay at home at all times. Why? 

• They can jeopardize safety of others 

• They can become vulnerable to mishaps, being run over by vehicles 

• They can also be stolen 

• They can become susceptible to health hazards 

• 
  

They should be allowed outside the home. Why? 

• This allows them to become familiar to surroundings and neighbors 

• This can keep them healthy and also cheerful 

• Mitigate boredom and aggressive behavior 

Whether pets should remain confined to their homes, or should they be taken  outdoors, is an issue that evokes mixed reactions. However, I strongly feel that outdoor endeavors are acceptable on condition that appropriate precautions are embraced while taking animals out. 

Those strictly averse to the idea of permitting dogs, cats, and other animals, kept at home, to enter the public domains feel that such expeditions by these creatures can jeopardize the safety, and sometimes the life of others. The behaviour of animals is quite unpredictable and their aggressive instincts can be triggered without warning, resulting in unannounced attacks even on neighbours. To corroborate, nearly fifty percent of all dog bite cases in New York are an outcome of dogs of those living in neighbourhood charging at victims. 

Similarly, these poor creatures themselves become susceptible to mishaps if they are let out of the homes such as being over-run by vehicles. To exemplify, as per the PETA report of 2025, nearly thirty thousand tamed dogs are crushed by cars and buses everyday in cities like London, and mostly within the close vicinity of their homes, reinforcing the belief that they are safer inside. 

Nevertheless, outdoor ventures of pets should not be curtailed; these afford a suitable mechanism to ensure wellness and regulate aggressive behaviour. Taking a monitored stroll on streets, and engaging in guided games in  parks, and sniffing around, among others, can render a healthy distraction, some independence, and a chance to abandon sedentary lifestyle, thereby evoking friendly behaviour in the animals, besides keeping them healthy.

Overall, the concerns expressed by the critics of outings by pets are quite justified, but circumscribing is unreasonable and unjust. This activity should be permitted in controlled conditions, wherein the owners bear the accountability of unforeseen incidents.   

Many nations like to host international sporting events, but people are against it. Describe both views and give your own opinion.

 Many nations like to host international sporting events, but people are against it. Describe both views and give your own opinion.

Why do nations want to host international sporting carnivals? 

1.  To arouse enthusiasm for sports among the local populace: promoting healthy lifestyles, and also highlighting sports as a huge occupational choice  

2. Create a huge industry with a potential for employment and business

3.  Putting the country on the world map prominently. *

a.  Increase in tourism 

b.  Allowing the world to appreciate  the native point of view 

c.   Attracting foreign companies

4.   Flaunting prosperity and  development. 

What are the failings of this practice, or rather why are many cynical of this?

1.  Colossal investments go into an event that will just last for a few days, and once the fervor has died down, the locals will be left to pay back the  debt. 

2.  Facilities developed do not only lie unused after the events are over, they also waste a lot of invaluable land resources  require a mammoth investment for maintenance

3.  The residents of the host cities must bear the pain for at least a decade preceding the event due to large scale construction and restructuring.  

4.  At the time of events also host city dwellers have a hard time due to restrictions. 

5.  Pollution levels rise tremendously. 

Nowadays, organizing international sports events has become a priority for many nations, but many consider such hosting as unnecessary and a waste of time. I will analyze both the views and share my plausible opinion. 

To begin with, hosting international sports events promise bringing in several social benefits. Preparing for such events often improves not only the relations with other nations but also brings people of the nation together. These events promote cultural exchange, when visitors and participants from other countries visit, they interact with the locals creating friendlier relationships. For instance, in 2000 during the Afro-Asian  games  Nigeria gained global  acclaim for its culture and its beautiful countryside. As a result, tourism increased in its country by manifolds over the next few years. 

Similarly, these events help promote sporting culture in the country. Youth are generally attracted by observing foreign and their local players compete, which encourages them to embrace their favorite sports as a profession, or at least integrate  daily exercise in their daily lifestyle. For instance, in 1982 commonwealth games were held in Asia where many Indians came out to be participants and this has made it widespread all over the country, which has made people follow a healthy lifestyle.

On the other hand, one of the major concerns is the high cost involved in preparing for these several events. Governments spend a lot of money on constructing venues and upgrading facilities, which may impact the budget and cut essential services like healthcare and education. 

In hindsight, while international sports can offer a social awareness but they also carry financial risk.the decision should be made after looking at the both long term and short term basis.