Today news channels and newspapers make use of pictures to support their reports. Some hold the view that pictures cannot be relied upon, while others feel that the importance of accompanying photographs cannot be ignored. Discuss and give your opinion in not less than 250 words

Today news channels and newspapers make use of pictures to support their reports. Some hold the view that pictures cannot be relied upon, while others feel that the importance of accompanying photographs cannot be ignored. Discuss and give your opinion in not less than 250 words

Proliferation of multimedia usage is causing  a profound shift in  reporting; reliance on photographs is seen in negative light, while a section  considers inclusion of this means as crucial for mass-media broadcasting. This essay shall critically examine these views and draw a plausible conclusion.

Proponents cite umpteen benefits of attaching photos with news reports: it allows readers to extract underlying information, for as they can visually correlate and comprehend the circumstances in which an event occurred. Additionally, authenticity of reports is established when news is complemented with related videos and images. To corroborate this, a survey carried out by The Times of India demonstrated that publications containing graphics witness acknowledgement from the audience as comprehensive and informative.

However, critics of this practice hold a negative view of such practice and vehemently oppose using any distraction while news reporting as it misleads users: in some extreme cases, paint a picture which at times is exaggerated. For instance, an article published by a prominent journalist misquoting the make and model of an accident-ridden aircraft led to a swatches of doctored images and AI-generated videos claiming origination of this report, leading to major criticism of the aircraft manufacturer and eroding millions in stock prices and invaluable trust of consumers.

Additionally, avid newspaper readers blame the overuse and abuse of snapshots as a tool to artificially increase the number of pages; through this, agencies can charge exorbitant prices per publication, dodging the main objective. This phenomenon furthered the degrading quality of journalism as it serves none but the advertisers.

Overall, although reports laden with images helps one to grasp the context, it should not be seen as a critical requirement of news as it can be counterproductive in certain  cases and unnecessarily occupy space and attention.

Multicultural societies bring more benefits to the country than drawbacks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Multicultural societies bring more benefits to the country than drawbacks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is generally professed that living in an environment populated by diverse ethnicities can be more rewarding than being challenging, while others vehemently counter this. This essay shall critically analyse both perspectives and draw a plausible conclusion.

Undeniably, sharing space with those hailing from diverse backgrounds, engenders a pulsating social environment introducing one to a wide range of traditions, cuisines, languages, thereby fostering a dynamic and vibrant cohort; instilling awareness and tolerance; and mutual respect among citizens through harmonious cultural exchanges, broadening their horizons. 

Additionally, such surroundings boast of a synergy of distinct economic skills: technical, entrepreneurial, social, and artistic, which substantiate economic and intellectual gains, while cross-cultural collaboration enhances creativity in sectors such as technology, business, and commerce. A diverse workforce brings varied perspectives and skills which drives innovation and productivity; to corroborate this, the majority of USA household growth is attributed to a rich conflation of skills brought in by disparate ethnic groups hailing from different regions of the world, some earning as high as $100k, a survey conducted by the UNO.

However, critics of multiculturalism contend that cultural diversity can lead to social fragmentation and communication barriers. Even though such occurrences are sporadic, variations in language, religion, and customs might  sometimes result in misunderstandings or a lack of social cohesion. In extreme cases, this can give rise to conflict or division within communities. For instance, newly arrived immigrants may struggle to assimilate, which might  create challenges for both the hosts and the newcomers.

Overall, although cultural diversity may present certain challenges related to cultural integration and social harmony, multicultural societies offer far greater benefits: they enrich cultural life, stimulate economic growth, and promote a more open and progressive society, making them an invaluable asset in the modern world.

Although it is generally illegal, physical punishment continues in many countries. Some argue that parents should have the right to punish their children in this way. Do you agree or disagree?

Although it is generally illegal, physical punishment continues in many countries. Some argue that parents should have the right to punish their children in this way. Do you agree or disagree?

A school of thought considers parents physically punishing their wards fair and just, while others vehemently oppose this approach since this can have long-term ramifications on the young psyche. I failed to concur with the former notion as it does little good.

To begin with, parents often resort to corporal punishment, but it often contributes to low self-esteem, anxiety, and aggressive behaviour later in life. When tender minds associate discipline with pain and fear, they learn to obey rules under the threat rather than developing genuine self-interest. Thus, far from teaching responsibility, this practice reinforces emotional harm, preventing them from exhibiting their views openly. Numerous studies conducted by reputable institutions, such as the American Psychology Association, concluded in their decade-long study that fear-based approach does not build characters; it merely suppresses behaviour temporarily, and increases the chances by tenfold of youngsters growing up with trauma, unable to express themselves clearly.  

Additionally, what is described as “unnecessary evil” can easily escalate into serious abuse; children cannot defend themselves, giving this authority creates a room for normalising the violence in households, especially when caregivers are upset or overwhelmed, causing bodily and mental harm, and in extreme cases can promote rebellious behaviour due to which, many times, youngsters grow up as individuals seeking revenge on others. A study conducted by the WHO concludes a direct correlation of good parenting with a high human development index, while a majority of violent adults admitted being subjected to use of physical form of retributions during their childhood.

Overall, although some defend an absolute iron hand, the harm clearly outweighs any perceived benefits. When safer and constructive methods of discipline exist, rendering physical punishment is harmful, outdated and replaceable with healthier strategies, therefore worthy of outlawing.

Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The impact of modern technology on society is widely debated. Some argue that technological advancement has widened the gap between the elite and the impoverished, while others believe it is helping to bridge this divide by creating new opportunities. This essay will discuss both aspects,and share a well-reasoned conclusion. 

Some fear that technology is causing social imbalance because access to it is disproportionate despite this notion being misplaced. Where the wealthy  can easily afford better education, advanced tools, and faster internet, allowing them to draw greater benefit from technological progress, the destitute do not have access to such privileges, and thus, are likely to trail, and  eventually fall behind. Similarly, there is a growing worry that new introductions will soon replace low-skilled jobs in manufacturing and services, potentially, leaving less-educated workers unemployed, thereby pushing them into abject poverty.   

However,  the former notion can be easily debunked; barring a few regions and population sectors, many have been able to gain education in their desired field by using the facilities like the internet. They now  can access courses and courseware without needing to pay out of their nose: they can join online courses hosted by various universities and online platforms, while remaining in their hometowns. For example, many hailing from less privileged backgrounds admit learning  new skills through free or low-cost online courses on platforms like Youtube, telegram and many online skill apps. In addition,  someone in a rural area can now study the same subjects as students in major cities without needing expensive institutions. 

In conclusion, technology is ensuring equitable distribution of resources among people belonging to disparate socioeconomic classes instead of increasing it. By improving access to education, jobs, markets, and financial services, state-of-the-art devices and methods have created opportunities for all. 

In some countries, it is illegal for employers to reject the people applying for jobs because of his/her age. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

In some countries, it is illegal for employers to reject the people  applying for jobs because of his/her age.  Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

In many parts of the world, businesses are forbidden from turning down job applications because of the age criteria. While this may fetch some benefits, it is likely to be detrimental at large; it will expose companies to numerous complications and hamper their productivity.  

A school of thought has welcomed this move, for it believes that now the elderly and the freshers will not have to struggle to make their ends meet, and become vulnerable to mental trauma, or partake in criminal activities, respectively, owing to financial hardships they might have to face due to lack of job. Moreover, this could save policy makers humongous money, otherwise spent on affording pensions and unemployment support, besides healthcare facilities.

Nevertheless, the impediments this policy poses are far more profound than the rewards it promises; the organizations will be robbed of the leverage of shortlisting appropriate candidates as per the occupational requirements. This could jeopardize the operations, expose the workforce to hazardous situations, and eventually, unfavorably impact the profitability because the workers hired may lack necessary experience, or mental and physical endurance to negotiate the tasks appropriately. 

Similarly, this is likely to result in companies bearing the burden of extending healthcare support, especially to the freshly hired aged personnel, to ensure that they do not fall sick due to work pressure. It will certainly result in extra unnecessary expenditure, thereby shrinking profits. To corroborate, undeniably, a majority of health support spending in various commercial organizations are allocated to aging employees.       

In hindsight, while anti-age discrimination norms may yield some advantages, their application is likely to undermine functional and financial viability of enterprises. Therefore, their adoption is a disadvantageous introduction, and thus, they should not be made universal, but based on typical industry requirements sans physical hazards.

Some people believe that educating children at home provides more benefits than sending them to school. Do the advantages of home-schooling outweigh the disadvantages?

Some people believe that educating children at home provides more benefits than sending them to school. Do the advantages of home-schooling outweigh the disadvantages?

In recent times, many perceive that home tutoring for youngsters is more beneficial than attending formal tuition. The upcoming paragraphs will analyse this notion critically and conclude whether merits of this arrangement outstrip drawbacks.

Home-schooling  is considered superior by some  as young minds tends to feel safer and more comfortable in their home surroundings,  instead of conventional settings, which helps to enhance focus and understand the topics delivered more effectively because they can ask for clarification of their doubts from their tutors without fear or being judged by others.Moreover they can take their time and also request for repeating the lessons For instance, as  per a report published by the New York Times juveniles studying at home have experienced  75 percent improvement in their learning abilities.

Similarly, this system is more affordable, and parents can use the money saved to invest for ensuring a better future for their wards as they can make big savings, otherwise spent in paying for fee, uniform and other overheads. Likewise, youngsters can garner  practical skills including life skills, moral values, and practical knowledge alongside academics. 

However, the disadvantages of receiving schooling at home are more profound and can affect the academic and social development of young individuals. Children  may not receive guidance from professionally-trained teachers. Moreover, many households do not possess advanced educational tools and facilities that schools can provide, such as laboratories, libraries, and modern technology. Furthermore, children studying at home may have less opportunities to socialise with others, which can negatively affect their communication skills and emotional development.

To conclude, the system of schooling at home may offer some comforts, save money, improve concentration but this can deprive learners of accessing up-to-date educational tools, and learning about socialising. Thus, this is more detrimental than reward

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Nowadays,  various historical edifices are safeguarded by law: they are considered a critical legacy. However, some believe that these should be replaced by modern constructions, for they present impediments in the way of progress. This essay will critically examine the significance of preserving historical monuments and deliver a well-reasoned conclusion.

It is considered very important to preserve heritage sites as they carry a great nostalgic value, and help to create a link between the past and present. Likewise, these provide a medium to make the younger generation aware of the achievements of their ancestors, which will help to increase their knowledge of history and feel motivated to perpetuate their values.

Similarly, these sites assist the countries to attract tourists, helping boost the tourism industry. For instance, the government of Malta has maintained their old forts and churches, and promoted them as tourist locations. resulting in a 70 percent increase in the  total tourism revenues, and also creating employment in this industry.

However, history plays a vital role in the development and economy of a country; nevertheless, old buildings need huge investments for maintenance and refurbishment, something that poses a huge burden on taxpayers. Likewise, sometimes, it becomes nearly impossible to find similar materials used while constructing the monuments.

Moreover, many of these edifices are unsafe and despite regular maintenance, remain vulnerable to collapse, which can lead to accidents. For instance, in Indonesia, parts of old town halls have deteriorated over time due to weathering and lack of proper conservation, posing risks to both visitors and the monuments themselves.

To conclude, protecting historical sites is extremely essential; they preserve cultural heritage, educate future generations, and contribute significantly to tourism, but maintaining every building can be expensive and challenging thus only the most relevant should be preserved. 

In many countries, coffee chains are expanding rapidly, which some claim threatens the survival of small local cafés. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In many countries, coffee chains are expanding rapidly, which some claim threatens the survival of small local cafés. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a noticeable trend in expansion of coffee chains in various countries around the globe, while some lobbyists believe that this growth is jeopardizing the survival of local cafes. This essay will critically analyze this perspective and deliver a well-reasoned conclusion.

Many well-established coffee chains are increasing rapidly due to their effective pricing strategies. They maintain standardized prices across all their outlets. Likewise, they offer frequent discounts and special deals, particularly through specific bank cards. For instance, popular coffee chains like Starbucks provide discounts and special offers on payments made through certain bankcards, luring more customers and helping their business grow quickly. Consequently, they are snatching business from local brands.

Moreover, these chains offer higher customer satisfaction as compared to local ones, through additional services: free wifi, complementary cookies on birthdays, and so on. Additionally, they provide a better ambience, which leads to greater customer retention. For example, many students in Vancouver prefer studying in Tim Hortons due to its comfortable seating, free Wi-Fi access, and relaxing environment. Consequently, this encourages longer visits and repeat customers, supporting expansion of such chains and closure of small businesses.

However, cafes having regional presence cannot disappear as they have their own unique characteristics like authentic  local tastes and personalized experience,which large chains often fail to replicate. Additionally, small cafes can survive because they have lower operational costs and can easily change their menu and prices. This flexibility helps them to compete with big rivals.

To conclude, although the rapid expansion of coffee chains offer several merits such as standardized pricing and enhanced customer experience, it does not necessarily pose a serious threat to local cafes, because the latter  continue to attract customers through their unique authentic tastes and flexibility

Some people think the government should subsidise fruits and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable. Others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think the government should subsidise fruits and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable. Others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In contemporary times, there is a growing debate on the topic of whether the state should contribute fruits and vegetables to promote a healthier lifestyle, while some lobbyists believe that edible goods that threaten health should be levied extra charges to make them unpopular.  

Subsidizing fruits and vegetables can persuade citizens to opt for healthier options as they will purchase healthier food due to its  affordability. It will even help the impoverished to buy healthier food. For instance, in Fiji, introduction of subsidised healthier food options led to a significant rise in their consumption. People from lower-income households reported feeling more energised and less dependent on junk food, showing how price adjustment can drive healthier lifestyle changes.

Similarly, reducing prices will promote healthier food habits and prevent disease. By doing this, the government can save financial resources typically spent on providing medical care. Additionally, this policy can stimulate the healthy local produce sans preservatives. By making fruits and vegetables more affordable, small farmers will get more business, which will strengthen the rural economy. 

On the face of it, some people argue that the state should tax unhealthy food instead, as this would discourage consumption and reduce spending on these items, especially among younger generations. They will  have less money to spend on such goods; consequently, they will shift to safer options. Likewise, this will force the manufacturers to reformulate their products, using healthier ingredients, as they would need to adapt to changing consumer demands and avoid additional tax burden.  

In conclusion, while subsidizing healthy food can improve access and affordability, taxing unhealthy food offers a complementary approach such as leading consumers toward healthier choice and promoting healthier production practices. Ultimately, a balanced strategy might be a most effective solution. 

Nowadays some governments encourage industrial factories and businesses to move out of large cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Discuss and give your opinion.

Nowadays some governments encourage industrial factories and businesses to move out of large cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Discuss and give your opinion.

In contemporary times, there has been an ongoing debate about relocating industrial factories and businesses out of large cities. While this trend offers several merits, it also has some notable demerits. This essay will discuss both the positive and negative aspects before presenting my own opinion.

One of the benefits of this policy is that it is helping in reducing congestion in urban areas. This lack of commercial activities will mean fewer people crowding public places and roads will have lesser traffic. Furthermore, it can also help to reduce environmental pollution caused by these factories and business establishments. For instance, in 2010, many industries in Delhi were reallocated to the outskirts to reduce pollution, and it helped to improve air quality dramatically.  

This can also assist in economic growth in new areas, as relocating industries can create jobs and boost the local businesses in the less developed regions, promoting a balanced economic development by creating employment in the areas which are generally underdeveloped, such as jobs in construction and raw material supply.

However, there are various downsides to this shift. Relocating generally requires high costs, which can affect the owners of the factories and businesses. In addition, it may lead to unemployment in the metropolitan areas, as a large number of skilled individuals work in these places, and if their workplace is shifted, they may not want to shift causing them to lose their jobs, and posing challenges in locating appropriately qualified workforce, pushing them to losses and, forcing them to close.

In conclusion, while relocating industries and commercial entities may benefit urban surroundings by medicating environmental problems, and also creating jobs for unskilled and semi-skilled workers, complications will be far more, it will have economic ramifications. Thus this is an unfavorable evolution. 

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Of late, the impact of violent content in films and television has become a matter of concern, which has prompted a suggestion that such content must be effectively regulated to help stem unlawful endeavors. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and deliver a well reasoned conclusion.

Many individuals believe that exposure to violent content can lead to aggressive behaviour and policy makers should take controllable measures; young people may imitate aggressive actions they watch on films and repeated exposure can normalise violence. For instance, many schools have reported that students attempt to recreate fight scenes they watch   on television, which results in serious injuries.

Similarly, constant exposure to films, ads or operas portraying brutality, makes people less sensitive to sufferings, resulting in reducing empathy and increasing tolerance of crime. To corroborate, a report published by WHO suggests a correlation between violent media and people becoming apathetic and considering illegal ways as a general behavioral approach. In addition, some films and shows portray criminals as heroes, showing violent tendencies as exciting and a rewarding activity.

On the flip side, some believe that films and media do not play any role in pushing the audience towards criminal activities as everyone is quite rational and can differentiate between fiction and reality. They argue  that criminal actions are the result of personal choice, not just influence. Likewise, many claim that TV and cinema appeared in the 20th century while unlawful activities have existed ever since humans existed on this planet. Therefore blaming modern media is not justified. 

In conclusion,despite different opinions, I believe that the government should regulate violent content in films and television, as it can significantly influence behaviour. Implementing measures such as age restrictions and broadcast limitations can help reduce the negative impact.

Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A prominent section of environmentalists suggest that strivings for registering progress has precipitated unavoidable destruction of the ecology. The following paragraphs shall critically analyse this notion, and elucidate and justify disagreement with this perspective.   

An  army of people connected with environmental initiatives fear that attempts to log unprecedented progress has predisposed nature to reckless and indiscriminate exploitation, and irreversible harm. For example, rampant deforestation is still being carried out to create space for farming-to grow  food; factories for producing goods; residential, commercial and institutional facilities, to accommodate growing/expanding population, businesses, shops and hospitals, among others, thereby destroying numerous natural habitats.

Similarly, emissions from factories, automobiles, besides the residual trash being dumped and discharged into all three spheres of the environment: land, water and air, are turning the Earth inhospitable, incapable of supporting life. To corroborate, global warming is speeding up, affecting the flora and fauna, and distorting their behaviour. Moreover, the marine environment is being impacted by high carbon content, plastic, and so forth, jeopardizing aquatic life. 

Nevertheless, despite the concerns being expressed being justified, a turn around is being brought by innovative and sophisticated tools in methods that will change the fortunes of the planet. Vertical cities and farming are being aggressively promoted, and fortunately gaining acceptance, which will allow rewilding. Additionally, governments are committed to make greener fuels and recycling, the mainstay of activities carried out in industrial, commercial and household sectors. These factors cumulatively will ensure delinking development from the environment, and promise a sustainable future for inhabitants and surroundings. 

In hindsight, while the concerns raised about the planet becoming vulnerable to rapid deterioration are justified, the scenario has been rapidly transforming due to the advent of up-to-date technologies that will ensure mitigation of environmental complications and allow advancement autonomously. 

Nowadays people are spending too much money to celebrate personal and family events such as weddings, birthdays and so on. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give your opinion and examples.

Nowadays people are spending too much money to celebrate personal and family events such as weddings, birthdays and so on. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give your opinion and examples.

It is commonly perceived that, today, spendings on personal and family events have surged phenomenally. I agree with the notion: I feel that many are using even the small occasions to help strengthen relationships and create memories.  

One of the reasons fueling this trend is the fact that in concurrent times most live in nuclear families and all relatives live far from each other, which makes it difficult for them to meet regularly. Therefore, they usually organise huge events, to help relatives and friends to congregate, and enjoy together. This may result in higher expenditure, as hosts feel the need to arrange elaborate events, but it helps create nostalgic memories.

Similarly, the influence of social media platforms: Instagram and Facebook, persuades many to spend substantially on events just to showcase their celebrations in a grand and appealing way: organizing events at luxury venues, using expensive decorations, and  sporting designer outfits, among others, just to impress others. For instance, many weddings include pre-wedding shoots and many other unnecessary events, and it is commonly admitted that this behavior is driven by social media influencers.

Another significant factor is the growing tendency to emulate the elite. Many families aspire to replicate the lifestyle showcased by public figures, believing that grand celebrations reflect success and social prestige. They tend to emulate them and celebrate like them. Consequently, they often lavish money on weddings and parties. Moreover, companies in the event management and fashion industries constantly promote the idea that bigger celebrations are better, pushing even middle-income families to overspend to host opulent events.

In conclusion, celebrations have always been deemed essential for strengthening relationships, and the growing tendency to spend excessively is largely driven by the intent to create lasting memories, and also respond to social pressure and expectations.  

Nowadays many young people deliberately damage public places. What are the causes and solutions?

Nowadays many young people deliberately damage public places. What are the causes and solutions?

In recent years, many young people have been involved in vandalism of public properties, often due to lack of civic awareness and peer pressure. This essay will examine the main causes of this issue and will propose possible solutions to control.

One of the main reasons persuading youngsters to deface communal assets is the lack of civic awareness, as they usually fail to recognise the value of public infrastructure and end up destroying it. Likewise, peer pressure also plays a significant role, as many often engage in such behaviour to gain attention and acceptance among their social circles. In addition, inadequate parental supervision is another reason, as few are appropriately guided toward socially responsible behaviour.

Similarly, another key factor is weak laws; lenient provisions for punishment for such acts, fail to deter individuals from engaging in harming public assets. For instance, in London, if a young individual is caught damaging public infrastructure, he or she may only receive a warning and be let off. Moreover, absence of counseling for anger management is also leading the young generation to vent their frustration through engaging in this kind of activity. 

To mitigate this issue, several measures can be implemented. Stricter laws and penalties should be enforced to dissuade such behavior. For instance, in Lithuania, those caught engaging in such endeavors are restricted from availing  scholarships and are required to perform community service for at at least one month. In addition, educational institutes should engender enlightenment about civic responsibilities among juveniles to raise awareness about the significance of public property.

In hindsight, taking everything into account, while vandalism is a complex issue driven by a range of underlying factors, it can be effectively reduced through enforcement of stricter regulations and promotion of greater awareness. 

We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we can’t trust the journalist. Discuss and give your opinion. What do you think are the important qualities that a journalist should have?

We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we can’t trust the journalist. Discuss and give your opinion. What do you think are the important qualities that a journalist should have?

In the modern era, news plays a major role in spreading information, but some believe that trusting journalists is not possible, while others dissent.This essay will discuss both views and highlight essential qualities that news reporters are expected to demonstrate.

There are valid reasons for people doubting  reporters. In some cases, media houses prioritize viewership and profit over accuracy, leading to distorted reporting. Additionally, some news professionals may be driven by political, or corporate interests, resulting in biased reporting. The rise of misinformation, especially in the digital era, has  further damaged the credibility of journalism, making it difficult for the general public to distinguish between factual and misleading news.

However, these allegations are not true in a majority of cases, for several newsmen and women have been complying with the tenets of ethical reporting, wherein they tend to delve deeper into any event and investigate exhaustively before presenting news to the general populace, and never compromise with their principles. This can be clearly evidenced by constant job switching by reputed correspondents who are shown the door by the media owners for not surrendering to their whims.  

Moreover, many, in order to ensure credibility,  are akin to being closely connected to the fundamentals of this strategically sensitive profession: accountability for their work and willingness to correct their mistakes. For instance, while reporting during Covid, pandemic  2020, many renowned newspersons from the New York Times, admitting citing unsolicited numbers of deaths due to infection, issued not only apologies but also republished the whole report.   

In my opinion, although there are legitimate concerns about the trustworthiness of newspersons, most remain committed to the principles such as accuracy, honesty, accountability and integrity. I feel a few non-adhering professionals fa

Many people think that the government should spend money to explore life in the outer space, while others think that it’s a waste of public money. Discuss both views and include your own opinion and examples.

Many people think that the government should spend money to explore life in the outer space, while others think that it’s a waste of public money. Discuss both views and include your own opinion and examples. 

Many people argue investments into space research should continue, while others consider it to be wasteful spending. This essay will discuss both views before presenting my perspective.

On one hand, investing in space exploration can help in advancing many technologies, such as weather forecasting systems,navigation tools and satellite communications. Furthermore, it can allow discovering resources like minerals that could be brought back to the earth and used by mankind. For example, heavenly bodies like the Moon are explored to discover essential minerals and materials like water and metals, to name a few, for this could be used back home.  Similarly, this could also help locate other habitable zones in the universe that could be settled by the populace, in case something goes wrong on the Earth due to nuclear war and environmental degradation. For example, Mars exploration is going on to find whether life can exist beyond Earth.

On the other hand, opponents contend that allocation of a vast sum of public money is difficult to justify as there are already preexisting socio-economic problems such as poverty, lack of healthcare facilities, infrastructure development, education, and so forth, which  demand immediate attention .Critics believe that instead of spending in space it is better to invest in improving standard of living and reduce inequality. Excessive government spending on space exploration may further deprive the already vulnerable communities of essential resources, exacerbating complications. For instance, instead of spending on space exploration, policy makers should invest into infrastructure, better educational institutions and healthcare facilities, which would directly benefit citizens.

In my view, although space exploration is very important for science and even technology advancement, it should not overshadow existing societal challenges. The state should follow a balanced approach between infusing funds into space programs and meeting public demands.  

Some people believe that university education should be free for everyone. Others think students should pay for their own education. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that university education should be free for everyone. Others think students should pay for their own education. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Many argue that universities must extend courses without charging any fee, while others think otherwise. This essay will critically examine both perspectives before presenting a well-reasoned conclusion.

Free university education can enhance college enrolment, thereby increasing the chances of promoting innovation, and churning out expertise to take society forward. Furthermore, it can strengthen the economy by creating a highly skilled workforce, capable of working in various strategic sectors of the economy. For instance, in Latvia, free university education has encouraged a growing number to pursue higher studies, resulting in greater participation in research and technological development. This has resulted in learners becoming inventive in critical fields such as artificial intelligence,  which has led this nation to strengthen its plan for the knowledge-based economy. 

Similarly, this policy could make higher education more accessible to all, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds, and thus, help reduce the gap between the rich and the poor, and also allow the deprived to harness their latent talent, benefitting society at large, in terms of ensuring distribution of equitable opportunities to all. Moreover, those hailing from middle and lower income groups will not have to worry about subscribing to expensive educational loans. 

Nevertheless, many believe that university goers should be accountable for paying their tuition fees; it will assist them in understanding the value of education, persuading them to be more consistent, and stay focussed on their studies. Additionally, this will also help in saving public money because only devoted learners will enroll in university courses.

To conclude, while charging tuition fees may help students realize the value of education and ease the financial burden on governments, free university education is a better approach; it  will ensure equal access to higher studies and help create a skilled workforce, benefiting the entire nation.

Most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, in which case job satisfaction is an important element of individual well being. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? Discuss and give your views. Write at least 250 words.

Most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, in which case job satisfaction is an important element of individual well being. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? Discuss and give your views. Write at least 250 words.

Most spend exponentially long hours tied to their work cubicles, making it imperative to ensure that they remain content with their work. Ensuring this hinges on numerous aspects and  can profoundly impact the wellness of workers. However, some challenge this and feel this term cannot be quantified.  

The most important factor contributing to contentment with employment is monetary benefits. These help one to lead a joyful life by allowing them to fulfill their essential needs like food, clothes, gym memberships, and so forth. Similarly,  the working environment also plays a very crucial  role in this state of mind. Positive atmosphere, work culture, management support, and cooperative colleagues help personnel to stay motivated while engaging in their tasks.

Another key factor is opportunities for career growth and skill development; this helps draw a sense of achievement, and thus, contentment. In addition, work-life balance also contributes a lot as this helps individuals have a balance between work and personal life, without bearing excessive stress, and sustaining their mental and physical wellness. Apart from that, having job security affords peace of mind and helps improve overall well-being, and thus, happiness.

Nevertheless, those skeptical of this term call it amorphous, which can rarely be attained. As people have different expectations and interests, jobs that are satisfying for some may not appeal to others. Likewise, some may prioritize monetary benefits over job security or work life balance. Additionally, the nature of certain jobs is dangerous or physically exhausting, making satisfaction difficult.

To conclude, favorable working conditions and adequate financial rewards significantly strengthen  the sense of  job satisfaction, and despite some doubting the relevance of this concept, it holds a great substance and can help an organization accomplish its objectives due to greater and healthier participation of its workforce. 

 

Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organised and in the current place. What is your opinion about this?

Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organised and in the current place. What is your opinion about this?

An overwhelming majority stresses on the importance of neat arrangement at the workplace, and in dwelling spheres. I lend my support to this notion, and this essay shall delve deeper into matter and justify my view.

To commence with, uncluttered surroundings have always inspired innovation, as organized arrangement positively influences humans to immerse themselves into novel and inventive ideas. To illustrate, renowned artists are obsessed with cleaning their tools and workbenches, since well-kept tools and spotless surfaces motivate them to perfect the craft. Maintaining tidiness highlights professional attitude and screams perfection.

Additionally, maintaining order at professional and living places circumvent efforts invested into finding key objects when required, mitigating delays and helping prevent the chaos of sifting through cluttered spaces. It is usually observed, professionals planning their day begin with organizing their desks, and their colleagues readily assume them to be more productive and, often, better leaders. For example, world over, ones keeping their workstations are found to be quite efficient and quick to act since their efforts are not lost in trying to sift through documents, belongings and data, even their databases loudly talk of this trait of theirs.  

However, this task of repetitive upkeep is viewed as unnecessary and a source of distraction because not every spot can afford to remain flawless all the time, and is bound to get dirty at some point. This also takes away crucial working hours out of professional commitments and can be viewed as escapism, thereby diminishing the upsides thereof.

In hindsight, the advantages of maintaining order and cleanliness within the professional and personal spheres ameliorates disarray and promotes creativity, productivity, and highlights the sense of professionalism, and the ones finding themselves in disorderly surroundings are rarely able to organize their work and considered inefficient.   

In many counties, life-expectancy of people is increasing and they require a huge amount of money at their retirement. An alternative is that they should start work at a young age . Is this alternative a positive or negative development?

In many counties, life-expectancy of people is increasing and they require a huge amount of money at their retirement. An alternative is that they should start work at a young age . Is this alternative a positive or negative development?

Positive 

• Assumption / postulation: when people will work for longer tenure, they will earn more 

Negative 

• Expose them to stagnation in careers since they might not be able to complete their education and find themselves lacking in this area, it is bound to impede their  progress 
• Cause them suffer from ailments early on due to the stress resulting fro hectic work schedules 
• An unhappy society 

Some suggest that to counter the challenges posed by a prolonged post-retirement lifespan, one should engage in professional endeavors quite early on; this will be quite beneficial. However, I feel it is an unfavorable evolution because it will certainly hinder personal and occupational progress in the long run. 

Those advocating embracing employment when one is quite young assume that this will afford a longer working tenure, and thus, a bigger window of opportunities to earn and save for the autumn years. For example, it will be possible to earmark funds for investments into creating financial buffers through securities, and so forth, for a stretched period, and those resources could facilitate a comfortable life as a retiree.

Nevertheless, this presumption lacks substance because such an approach will prove to be counter productive. To initiate working earlier than the conventional age, youngsters will be required to abandon education midway, which will deprive them of chances to gain appropriate acumen in the trade they involve themselves in. Consequently, there is a great likelihood of them being straightjacketed into poorly compensated employment for life. This will severely restrict their ability to raise their earnings, and become capable of saving for old age. 

Moreover, following this strategy will make individuals vulnerable to stress caused by an elongated working term, precipitating myriad ailments like hypertension, cardiac complications, and other problems. Such a situation will surely offset any benefits derived by being in employment for more than contemporary arrangements; the money saved will be exhausted in seeking treatments.

In hindsight, a longer professional involvement is unsustainable, for the perceived rewards resulting from such a practice fail to convince; any advantages derived are likely to be exceeded by the accompanying problems such as impeding accomplishment of  better careers, besides impacting wellbeing. 

Some argue that teachers should focus on academics more than motivating students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some argue that teachers should focus on academics more than motivating students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Why focus only on imparting lessons? 

• The job of educators, as per modern theorists,  is to only engage with scholastic abilities of learners 
• This can help them to effectively cover the syllabus and also revise, and test the learners

Motivation is a critical part of teaching 

• Schooling means overall development and teachers are the agent of this process 
• This can inspire behavior change 
• Persuasion by teachers is pivotal to excellent academic outcomes 
• This can motivate learners to attend schools, enhancing interest in schooling and education 
• Let learners discover their latent talents and strengths 

Some experts say that teachers should focus on academics, while some say they should also motivate students. However,  I partially agree with this statement, and shall explain my stand in the following paragraphs. 

To start with, people usually say educators should focus on lessons more than encouraging and indulging with pupils as their sole job is to teach. Subjects like science, maths, and other logistic subjects require seriousness and utmost concentration. Without strong academic and strictness in teaching, students may struggle to perform well in their theory based exams or understand complex topics. For example, if an educator is more focused on imparting lessons, it will help them to effectively cover the syllabus as logical subject comes with a lot of theory and formulas to remember that being said they can also revise the topic again in the extra time and also at the end test the pupils about their understanding and knowledge.

Having said that,motivation is a crucial part of schooling as many students tend to lose interest in the subject which requires brainstorming and practical application. As the subjects are tough for to understand and remember, it is very usual that they  get low scores in exam, making them lose confidence during school years. On the contrary, a motivated student can achieve more than the memorized information provided the faculty is committed to push and persuade learners and are friendly. This makes learners feel at ease in talking about the doubts and asking questions which results in better understanding.

In conclusion, even though laying emphasis on academics is important because it can help learners excel in examinations, teaching professionals should not abandon the important role of being a mentor as this can turn even the average performers into brilliant ones. 

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Incrementing use of personal four wheelers has ensued a fierce debate, with a suggestion of improving the road system surfacing; however, who should bear the cost: policy makers or motorists, is still undecided and needs critical analysis. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will discuss both the aspects and share a well-reasoned viewpoint.

To start with, those thinking relevant authorities should don the mantle assert that people are paying a hefty amount of money in terms of taxes, and they expect that it should be utilized in sectors where the need arises, and road infrastructure is one of them. Similarly,  they are also contributing to maintenance and expansion of expressways:  road tolls.  Moreover, it is a mixed: state and central subject;  the lawmakers have the responsibility to provide and maintain the bridges, highways, and so on, ensuring the safety of users. 

On the other hand, many believe that those plying their vehicles  should bear this burden by paying the cost of services; they are the primary road users and contributors to traffic snarls and damage to roads, like potholes, congestions, and so forth. Hence, the theory of “who contributes more should pay more” is completely aligned with this arrangement. To corroborate, Spain is the only country in the world, where roads are managed by the vehicle owners since their inception and construction, resulting in no traffic on roads; preference being given to mass commute. 

To conclude, I believe a balanced approach is the best resort where the state and users should share the responsibility, helping maintain an up-to-date infrastructure, precipitating a decline in the number of mishaps and traffic jams. This would help derive a more prudent use from motorists and other road users. 

In some countries, at secondary school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15?

In some countries, at secondary school, there may be two or three streams of studies, academic or vocational. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15?

The contemporary schooling system hinges on rendering different learning paths to pupils in high school such as academic and vocational. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits and pitfalls of this arrangement for them and society. 

 

This  setting has umpteen benefits: this can allow learners to follow their interests; some are keen in academics, while others in trade skills, and such a policy can help them in early preparation for their career; they become more confident when their education aligns with their interests and future goals. Several successful professionals ranging from engineers and doctors to business managers, credit their accomplishments to the segregation they were subject to while attending formal tuition. Likewise, from the perspective of society, this kind of streaming can make skilled professionals available faster, and fulfill rising demands in strategic sectors: healthcare, plumbing, carpentry, and so on, besides becoming capable of contributing to economic productivity.  

Nevertheless,  although there are advantages galore, one can hardly ignore the failings of this setting; many are not mature enough to decide what they want to pursue, and when they realise it, it is too late to get specific qualifications to  chase their dreams, and also it is hard to switch streams.  Similarly, as far as the social environment is concerned, the bifurcation can fuel a permanent wedge and social inequality among those preferring academics and the ones opting for skilled occupations: their aspirations and intellect witness a wide variation, letting them drift away from each other.   

  

To conclude, this  approach is rewarding: it provides ample opportunities to learners to follow their ambitions and future endeavors by absorbing acumen required  in their desired occupation, and nations can benefit from quick generation of critical skills, while the detriments can be mitigated by appropriate counseling.