It is better to buy just a few expensive clothes, rather than lots of cheaper clothes. Do you agree or disagree?

It is better to buy just a few expensive clothes, rather than lots of cheaper clothes. Do you agree or disagree?

A general perception is emerging that purchasing minimum premium clothing instead of a plethora of low-priced alternatives. Although I believe both sides hold substance, I tend to favour the high-valued clothes.

Some assert that exorbitantly priced attires are of finest quality, are long-lasting owing to the workmanship invested into these, eliminating the need for recurring shopping. Moreover, by donning such ensembles, one can achieve opulence and be influential among peers, and hence, leaving an impression where just with a few pieces can make them look and feel elite. For example, when asked during an interview on national television, many showed support for the attire costing several arms and several legs since this impacted their social persona favorably. 

Similarly, this practice is often compared to sustainable practices. This is to say, everyday piles and piles of dirt cheap clothes are being dumped in landfills, causing serious damage to the environment: soil degradation; they are non-recycleable items. To corroborate, in Japan, over the last decade, there has been an enhancement in the quality of soil since many have curtailed the usage of cheap outfits and supported costly wear.

Furthermore, manufacturing a large amount of clothes puts pressure on the resources and burns a colossal amount of fossil fuel: clothing is only material that cannot be recycled but is vulnerable to redundancy owing to changing vogues. Nonetheless, If people buy a handful of couture and avoid unnecessary shopping for a multitude of cheap clothes; consequently, alleviating the usage of natural resources, which are limited and precious. 

Nevertheless, a group hypotheses that clothing acts as a medium to express creativity, especially among youngsters, who have limited money but want to be fashionable: following such a  propensity would engender inequality, and put many at a disadvantage. Also, some tend to purchase a variety of discounted clothes, for everyday use and avoid repeating the previous outfit. However, this can be countered by convincing them about getting one quality attire for the sake of the planet. 

In conclusion, disputes aside, buying limited costly outfits is a sensible approach since they are long-lasting, helps one attain an impressive social facade, and also aids the environment.

Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Although some believe that taxing manufacturing units alone can act as a reliable medium of coaxing them to switch to greener technologies, this is highly questionable: it is prone to failure. I believe there are more potent tools of convincing manufacturers to act.   

Those advocating environmental tariffs found their argument on the assumption that this move would make the produce expensive, and thus uncompetitive, forcing organizations to spring into action and embrace eco-friendly methods. However, these enthusiastic lobbyists conveniently disregard  an infallible fact that the pollution is not the outcome of an isolated exception, but the industry as a whole, and every manufacturer will espouse evasive strategies. They will compromise with the quality and quantity, and shift the extra burden to the end users, turning the policy ineffective. 

Nevertheless, the need of the hour is to find remedies that can produce tangible outcomes rather than just doing lip service. It is essential to engage businesses by making them partners in the endeavors aimed at ensuring a sustainable environment, and this goal can be achieved if they are made stakeholders in research projects that target discovery of environmentally-friendly fuels, manufacturing techniques, and waste disposal policies.

Similarly, affording monetary stimulus, in the form of tax holidays and rebates, subsidies and support funding, can do wonders in convincing companies to take ownership, and make efforts to phase out old unsustainable and unviable technologies and equipment, and replace them with environmentally-sound procedures and processes. This system has been welcomed by industrialists in countries like China and Germany, for it is a persuasive rather than a punitive measure.

In hindsight, taxation is likely to encourage the industry to resort to unfair means, but partnering with them, besides extending financial inducements, will provoke honest and devoted efforts for environmental protection.  

These days the personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organisations. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

These days the personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organisations. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Does retention of details of users by internet service providers and large organizations carry more benefits or drawbacks, is a matter that evokes mixed responses. However, I uphold the  view that this policy is more rewarding, provided appropriate safeguards are embraced to ensure user safety. 

This procedure can save immense time, otherwise wasted in sharing details again. Most portals require one to provide details: name and the date of birth, to name a few, and once the information is submitted, it is saved in the permanent database, helping save humongous time and energy, and allowing one to proceed ahead and complete their task quickly, especially while seeking healthcare services or interacting with government schemes. 

Moreover, this system allows governments to create and maintain the profiles of their citizens, and regulate and monitor, or extend them relief when required. To exemplify, authorities in various countries in the western hemisphere follow this practice and afford monetary and healthcare assistance to the inhabitants, particularly the elderly, whenever and wherever required. 

Nonetheless, this system has an inherent detriment: privacy concerns. The personal information becomes vulnerable to unsolicited access, and users might become victims of cybercrime and scams. There has been a spike in incidence of frauds, wherein cyber criminals steal profiles and money, leaving victims helpless. To corroborate, in India, a significant number of online scams are registered every year due to personal data leaks, especially in the case of financial transactions carried out using payment apps. 

To encapsulate, the pros of the policy of private data retention are numerous: it can prove to be time and effort efficient, and exceed the complications. However, the justified concerns about probable online frauds, like getting unwanted messages and calls should be addressed by concerned establishments, to ensure enhancing the browsing experience. 

 

In some countries, more and more people are hiring a personal fitness trainer, rather than playing sports or doing exercise classes. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or a negative development?

In some countries, more and more people are hiring a personal fitness trainer, rather than playing sports or doing exercise classes. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or a negative development?

Nowadays, many are employing personal wellness coaches instead of participating in sports or workout sessions. The reason seems to stem from a plethora of factors, which shall be discussed in the following paragraphs, and a conclusion will be drawn whether this phenomenon is beneficial or not.

To start with, an army of people asserts that individual trainers render services at home, making them a popular choice. One can workout at the comfort of their homes, eliminating the tedious task of traveling from home to sports centers. Moreover, these professionals also render personalized diet plans according to typical needs and preferences, aiding in holistic progress, where the diet and exercise are synchronized for the betterment of the trainee. Additionally, they act as guides owing to extensive seasoning and profound knowledge, helping in avoiding serious injuries during physical workout. 

Having said that, this trend is surely detrimental. Governments have heavily invested in public gyms for the betterment of the society. If people start hiring such services, such arrangements will be in vain as no one will use these facilities and authorities will have to face loss. Furthermore, if less and less people participate in group sessions,  working out and engaging in sporting disciplines will lose their charm, for humans are gregarious creatures and prosper in the presence of other participants and team mates: this inspires them to go further, and with this emerging system, upcoming generations, might be less inclined towards these activities and making the sports a talk of the past. 

In conclusion, the reasons for this prevailing phenomenon are comfortable at-home workouts, customized food plans, and guidance from the coach to eliminate workout injuries. This evolution is unfavorable since law makers have already made arrangements for the public: gyms and in the future, and sports might lose their popularity.

In schools and universities, some girls tend to choose arts subjects, while boys choose to study science subjects. What are the reasons? Do you think this trend should be changed?

 

In schools and universities, some girls tend to choose arts subjects, while boys choose to study science subjects. What are the reasons? Do you think this trend should be changed?

Nowadays, the gender preference while choosing streams at high school is witnessing wide variance, with females predominantly opting for humanities, and males electing STEM. There are several attributes driving this propensity, and needs a critical analysis to decide whether there is a need to alter this tendency. 

A lobby propounds that girls have a creative mindset, engendering a natural inclination toward arts. They profess profound knowledge of expressing through multiple out of the box mediums: paintings, sculpture, and so on. However, boys have critical thinking and analytical perspectives, some essential traits for becoming doctors and engineers, and hence they select science as their future career. Similarly, a few conservative hypothesize that since boys become breadwinners of the house, they should pick STEM subjects, which will fetch them handsome salaries, whereas arts tend to provide a medium to allow easy earning.

Nevertheless, this perception is quite prejudiced and should be changed immediately. Choosing the subjects should not be based on the genders rather on the misconceived concept of innate proclivity towards a field, ability and passion: there is no evidence to substantiate this. When students pursue areas they genuinely enjoy, they are more motivated, productive, and innovative. Encouraging transcending these orthodox barriers will not only promote equality but also help society progress as both men and women bring different perspectives to every realm. For example, as several human behaviorists, such as Professor Gurdeep Singh Bhatia, University of York, assert that leaning towards a domain is more personality-based  rather than gender-based, and recent surge in participation of males in arts and females in technology, substantiate their claim. 

In conclusion, I believe that both genders can choose any subject that they find appealing, and without being stereotyped and challenge the conventional system, ensuring that every student is free to follow their passion without being confined by gender expectations. 

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?

In this modern era, there is a greater reliance  on virtual means to gather and retain information, while in the past, printed materials used to serve this purpose. This essay shall discuss merits and demerits of this shift and assess whether the former outstrips the latter.  

It is evident that the information available online is  easily accessible and one can retrieve it in any part of the world with reliable resources: mobile, laptops and so forth. To corroborate, if one likes a Shakespeare novel, they do not need to carry printed material anymore; they can view and read the needed content on their phones while journeying  to work, and so forth, without needing to carry a burden along. Moreover, those traveling can forgo paper maps; they have a modern version of GPS-driven maps installed in their phones which can help them during their journey. 

However, it is also true that the information stored in printed form is the most reliable source, and hard to replace; data available on websites can be hacked and manipulated. Similarly, the virtual medium heavily relies on electricity, network and tech literacy, and if one does not have these at their disposal, they cannot store, recover and peruse material. For instance, one could fetch details from online resources only when their devices have enough power to function, besides having network availability, otherwise it is impossible to get information, whereas this is not the case with books. Nevertheless, these complications can be surmounted through prudent steps. 

In hindsight, there is little iota of doubt that the technology has helped eliminate human drudgery by allowing one to save, retain and retrieve data conveniently, and despite posing some limitations, this state-of-the-art facility can prove to be sustainable. Thus, its advantages overweigh its disadvantages.

Animals are at risk of extinction. Some people believe that we should only protect those species that are useful to us. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Animals are at risk of extinction. Some people believe that we should only protect those species that are useful to us. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some contemporary theorists are aligned with a view that since several animals are on the verge of disappearing, efforts and  resources must be invested into saving only the  economically viable. I fail to subscribe to this proposal in absolute terms, for this will prove to be a recipe for disaster.  

To start with, a lobby proposes just focussing on a few species, the governments can save money. This is to say, this will allow more monetary resources for investments into domains that can benefit humans. To corroborate, the money can be utilised in critical sectors: education, healthcare and many more, for the betterment and upliftment of the society. 

However, some strongly resist this and assert that this practice is biased and unethical. Every animal is imperative for ecological balance, and needs unconditional protection, and disrupting this delicate balance  will expose humanity to catastrophic outcomes:  turning the environment into inhospitable. For example, China witnessed a man-made famine during the 1960s, where the crops were ravished by insects. The contemporary regime ordered elimination of sparrows - the  natural predator of local pests - thinking these were enemies of farmers, galvanizing a  stupendous increment in the pest population. 

Moreover, the threat facing animals has been engendered by human activities: poaching, and hunting. Thus, if only selected animals are afforded safeguards, the rest will become vulnerable to such cruel acts - and cause an imbalance in the food chain - in the future since it is human nature to exploit the unprotected. 

In conclusion, disputes aside, one cannot be half pregnant, and only safeguarding animals essential for mankind will jeopardize  the balance of nature, and eventually predispose humans to dire consequences. Moreover, selfishness has led to such circumstances, and panacea lies in conserving every living being for the larger good of the planet. 

People believe 'vertical cities' are the best to live and work in while others believe ' horizontal' cities are better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People believe 'vertical cities' are the best to live and work in while others believe ' horizontal' cities are better. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with a dilemma whether it is beneficial to live and work in urban areas with vertical orientation, or one with horizontal silhouette. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.

To start with, a lobby propounds that the metropolitan areas dominated by skyscrapers afford unprecedented convenience to their dwellers. One can find markets, schools and offices at a stone’s throw distance, eliminating the cumbersome task of everyday commuting. For example, in Japan, many choose to live in surroundings that have high rise edifices since every imaginable facility is available in close proximity, alleviating distance and unnecessary travelling. Moreover, the houses are built on the small geographical footprint for accommodating a large populace, mitigating real estate prices and rents, besides creating room for greener buffers and surroundings as lesser space is brought  under  the occupation of concrete.

Having said that, an army of people asserts that urban locales having a flatter skyline lets dwellers enjoy nature and its benefits to the fullest.  This is to say, one can get a clear view of skies, often a luxury in the street canyons created by tall buildings around, enjoy free flowing breeze, and soak in sunlight loaded with Vitamin D: an essential ingredient for strong bones, and lead a healthier life. Additionally, such settings make evacuation uncomplicated during times of crises: flood, earthquake and so forth, ensuring that loss of life and material is minimized. 

To conclude, considering the aforementioned views, I believe life in both kinds of urban settings offers distinct benefits, where one has shorter distances and effortless accessibility to services, the other promises relaxing views and surroundings, and can be chosen as per convenience and preferences.  

Some people think parents should read or tell stories to their children, others say it is not important and can be replaced by watching TV and movies instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think parents should read or tell stories to their children, others say it is not important and can be replaced by watching TV and movies instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The debate over whether one should narrate tales to their wards, or whether this practice can be effectively replaced by TV and movies, has been ongoing. Both perspectives have justified points, and the choice often depends on individual family circumstances and beliefs.

Many believe that mothers and fathers should indulge in the age-old ritual of delivering legends and fables to their little one because of the deep emotional and cognitive benefits it offers. This fosters a strong bond between the two generations, as it promotes active engagement, interaction, and sharing of emotions. Similarly, this does not only improve the vocabulary and linguistic skills of tender minds but also develop their imagination; they tend to listen to their parents more attentively and also ask questions sometimes. Many admit that this has helped their young ones to learn to comprehend and use language more effectively since such narrations take place in a completely informal environment that sans inhibitions.  

Nevertheless, some argue that programs presented on tv and movies serve as modern replacements for bedtime stories. In the fast-paced world of today, where people have limited time, these digital media offer convenience by acting as a potent replacement. These mediums often present graphic and audio content, which are more engaging for young minds. Additionally, educational programs telecasted can teach various life lessons, enhance cultural understanding, and introduce global perspectives. For example, shows like Sesame Street have been known to teach little ones numbers, letters, and rhymes in a more enjoyable way.

In conclusion, although modern means of entertainment  can be beneficial in certain contexts, I believe storytelling is irreplaceable: it fosters emotional connection, and trust. Thus, one should ideally balance both methods, using screen-based entertainment in moderation while prioritizing conventional methods of disseminating tales whenever possible.

Many people think young people should follow traditions. Others argue that young people should be free to be individuals. Discuss both views

Many people think young people should follow traditions. Others argue that young people should be free to be individuals. Discuss both views

Some argue that the young generation should be connected to their native ways of life, while others reject it by contending that it is an individual prerogative. I will discuss both the views in upcoming paragraphs and share a plausible conclusion.

Undoubtedly,  complying with customs endemic to a community can help the youth to stay attached with their roots, and comprehend the rationale and scientific reasoning behind the rituals. For example,  in India, the custom of applying vermilion is very popular and has been followed since ages, for it is considered that applying it on the partition of the hair keeps away the bacterial infection, also reconfirmed by modern married women who admit that they rarely faced any scalp issues. Similarly, applying turmeric and Sandalwood powder on the forehead has its own religious benefits and scientific significance as it helps in fostering creativity, affording mental clarity, and calming the nerves.  Moreover, this will help young individuals enlighten upcoming generations about culture, rituals and moral values by partaking in festivals, special occasions, and so on. 

Nevertheless, the liberals assert that the young should never be forced to follow rituals, and it should be left to their own device. If they are bound to follow it, chances are higher that they might not be able to adapt to the fast changing world, resulting in limited personal growth, reduced creativity, and a lack of broader critical thinking skills necessary for surmounting modern challenges. Moreover, this liberty can  allow them to question the old-fashioned narratives and bring positive change in society by removing obsolete orthodox beliefs.

Overall, I think customs have their own value, but it should not be forced or imposed on the young people. A balanced approach will be the best where they should be made aware about the values of beliefs, but are also given room to explore and redesign them as per modern times.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Many prefer to conduct their lives and themselves consistently without deviations, while some seek alterations in their routines believing it fetches fruitful outcomes. This essay critically analyses both the views and serves justified conclusions. 

Undeniably, it is commonly seen that those who find their interest, or desired profession, at a very young age, circumvent switching. To corroborate, if an individual finds a well paid job with chances of growth, they plan on holding onto the same occupation, remain there for years. Moreover, they find themselves in a comfort zone and wish not to step out, fearing  losing everything, once they deviate from the course. This propensity is generally observed among the aging  individuals who dread venturing out in new directions: they feel it might expose them to failure. 

However, those keen to experience a new environment, prefer embracing different approaches, to create room for freshness: continuing in the same regimen for long is quite monotonous that can hamper their creativity. For instance, several musicians try fusing different genres of music in order to discover new sounds, and admit that this satisfies their craving for discovering new ways to produce music.  

Likewise, some, especially the  young and those freshly graduating university, explore new directions to enable enhancements in their professional domains. For instance, many venture into different streams: administration, skilled-jobs, driving, and so forth - until they gain competence - and switch  jobs to find better roles,  bringing rich yields, in the form of better professional, financial and social profiles.  

In hindsight, undeniably, everyone enjoys jurisdiction over the decision to lead the life their way. While some are conservative, others act dynamically and seek new horizons to enrich their lives, and afford themselves innovative ways to better their circumstances and surroundings, and I align myself with this view.  

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions?

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions?

Dramatically-incrementing temperatures pose a significant threat to humanity, especially in the current century, as it contributes to rising sea levels, extreme weather patterns and ecological imbalance. This has precipitated major concerns for coastal communities and nations around the world. I would like to discuss problems associated with this phenomenon and propose remedies. 

One of the most concerning complications of this phenomenon: the rising sea levels presented is the displacement of millions of habitats in low lying coastal areas. These  regions are increasingly at risk of flooding, leading to loss of homes, infrastructure and livelihoods. Countries like Bangladesh and islands, such as Maldives, are particularly vulnerable to this threat. In the long run, this could lead to mass migrations, creating a humanitarian crisis as people will seek refuge in safer areas. In addition,this has also precipitated distortion in weather patterns such as typhoons and storm surges. These events can cause widespread damage to cities and agricultural lands, threatening food security and economic stability in many regions. 

However, there are several potential antidotes to these menacing circumstances: alleviating greenhouse gas emissions, the primary driver of global warming, holds the key. Renewable  energy sources such as solar wind, and hydropower, should be prioritized and quickly supersede fossil fuels. Moreover, investing in more reliant infrastructure to withstand flooding tides can help. Coastal cities can build seawalls, levees and other protective structures to prevent flooding. Additionally, sustainable urban planning strategies should be adopted such as, restricting construction in flood prone areas, and implementing green infrastructure like parks and wetlands to absorb excess water.

In conclusion, the increasing influence of greenhouse effects presents serious challenges, from displacing populations to impacting economies. Thus, a combination of steps like emission reduction and sustainable development should be embraced to mitigate these impacts. 

Some believe that tackling environmental issues should be managed by a global organization instead of being handled individually by national governments. Do you agree or disagree with this belief?

Some believe that tackling environmental issues should be managed by a global organization instead of being handled individually by national governments.

Do you agree or disagree with this belief?

Why a universal approach?

• Environmental problems transcend political and geographical borders, and must be responded jointly 

• There is uneven distribution of resources, which could create an imbalance in implementation, but an international body can effectively bridge this void 

• A global approach can help resolve differences between different nations and engender cooperation 

Why locally? 

• National governments are better informed about the complications affecting local populations

• Decision making fast 

• There is a lack of trust between the the prosperous and destitute nations, the latter fear that the former may try to impede their development in the name of development     

The fast deteriorating health of the planet has drawn a profound interest in finding ways to alleviate this threat, and a majority believes that a task of such multitude requires international action. I subscribe to this notion because such a critical job cannot be negotiated effectively at the regional level.

Undeniably,  pollution transcends geographical and political boundaries and has a domino effect on other areas miles away, sometimes continents apart, from the source. This is likely to impact all forms of life far and wide, and jeopardize people, flora, and fauna. To corroborate, the arctic is getting contaminated by the residue of industrial effluents released from thousands of miles away in Egypt, India, and China, among others, killing the plankton, a food source of myriads species of fish. Such complications must be handled jointly by all countries if any tangible outcomes are to be achieved.

Similarly, individual undertakings aimed at resolving the environmental imbroglio will certainly  be hampered by uneven distribution of resources and expertise while elite societies have these at their disposal, the impoverished lack these. However, global cooperation can help make available essential elements and ingredients to enable discovery and deployment of mitigation tools and strategies. 

Nevertheless, although the skeptic lobby does raise its concerns regarding the developed nations overwhelming their underdeveloped counterparts to push their agenda of gaining control over the latter, these fears are unfounded and lack substance; the consequences of inhospitable environment will affect everyone in equal measure, and will be more pronounced in destitute countries owing to absence of mechanism to offset the environmental impact.

In hindsight, taking steps to avert ecological catastrophe should be the onus of a multilateral world body as only it can engender policies to enable concerted efforts from every part of the globe.

     

Due to so many young people dropping out from school, the rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?"

Due to so many young people dropping out from school, the rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?"

How can this situation be improved?"

• Initiating training in professional and vocational trades that allow young individuals to gain expertise in occupations 
• Revamping the existing educational framework that focuses on inclinations of students rather than gagging them with subjects that disenchant them 
• Integrating technology and modern methods in the classroom
• Giving them inducements  

With school dropouts becoming ubiquitous, youngsters are becoming susceptible to myriad complications:joblessness, which can have social implications.  This makes it imperative to discover solutions resonating well with them, and bringing them to education.    

The  upcoming generation can be stimulated to join back the school by incorporating subjects that disseminate acumen in trades that appeal to them, into the formal curriculum. This will help render them clarity about the objectives they seek to attain through education, and persuade them to finish their studies. In addition, the topics learners find useless, or unnecessarily overwhelming, should be shelved. For instance, the US educational authorities initiated the system of streaming as per the inclination of learners in 2015, and witnessed a phenomenal increment in high school enrollments, across the country.

Similarly, extending financial support, in the form of scholarships, or fee waivers, can be instrumental in motivating young learners, especially ones hailing from poor socioeconomic backgrounds, to rejoin schools. Financial hardships and poverty often compel families to pull out their children from the formal tuition, but such inducements can help coax them to educate their wards. To corroborate, this strategy has been successfully implemented in developing countries world over. 

Moreover, integrating technology in the classroom can spur an interest in the contemporary generation that is majorly surrounded by technology, in all spheres of their lives, to engage with their academic pursuits dedicatedly instead of abandoning them. To illustrate, most Canadian school dropouts admit that they dread using conventional methods, like books to study, which instigates them to relinquish schooling altogether.   

In hindsight, rationalising study plans, extending monetary stimulus to the deprived families, and introducing state-of-the-art tools to impart content, can afford panacea to aid in providing school education its deserving place, and protect future generations from severe ramifications.

Nowadays many young people are drawn towards dangerous sports. What makes them so attractive? What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimise the risks?

Nowadays many young people are drawn towards dangerous sports. What makes them so attractive? What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimise the risks?

Youngsters are becoming more inclined about enrolling themselves into hazardous sports. This propensity can be attributed to several causes, making it imperative to embrace steps to mitigate dangers associated with such endeavors. I shall elucidate both these aspects in the following paragraphs.

To start with, the most prominent factor driving the propensity is the media. The youth get exposed to entertainment channels and favorite TV actors who explore and perform adventure sports and either make videos or documentaries. These activities make the young audience curious to participate themselves into these endeavors and emulate their idols, and a majority admit following this pattern. For example, a renowned politician recently performed a dangerous sport called scuba diving at Lakshadweep in India, by virtue of this many young individuals got influenced and participated in this game.

Moreover, some do not need any kind of influence to explore these kinds of sports since they are born to experiment with such pursuits to escape from the daily mundane, and obtain unique and thrilling experiences. To corroborate, several participants in white water rafting competitions held in Rishikesh, credit such partaking to their intent to do something unprecedented.

Curtailing hazards associated with these pursuits is possible by adoption of myriad measures. People should adopt certain safety steps as safeguards: gaining certification from formal training, wherein they get a chance to experiment and perform under experts and professionals. Likewise, there should be someone to rescue if there is any kind of emergency: this will help turn these pursuits into safer engagements.

To conclude, there are various media outlets which influence young minds into participating in such hazardous sports, along with self motivation to experience new sports, but the associated hazards can be mitigated by embracing safety measures like formal training and protective gear.

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Discuss and give your opinion

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Discuss and  give your opinion 

Today, a growing number of highly qualified professionals from developing countries have been migrating to wealthier nations. While some argue that this trend amounts to exploiting destitute societies, others believe it reflects the natural movement of labour in a globalised world. In my opinion, although developed nations actively attract skilled workers, this migration is ultimately a normal and unavoidable global phenomenon.

Those who view this issue as exploitation allege that wealthy countries deliberately design policies to attract talent from abroad. They offer competitive salaries, comprehensive healthcare benefits, and improved living conditions to skilled professionals. Corporations and governments often create immigration pathways specifically targeting doctors, engineers, and IT specialists. Apart from that, prospective immigrants are also allowed to bring their families along and allow them access permanent residence, and then citizenship through the naturalization process, an offer too tempting to be overlooked. As a result, individuals from impoverished regions are drawn by financial security, career advancement and a stable family life.  

On the other hand, many debunk the former view and believe this movement is a natural consequence of economic disparity and global interconnectedness. Everyone enjoys the fundamental right to seek better opportunities and improve their standard of living, and extend themselves and their kin better facilities and future prospects. Ever since humans appeared on this planet, they have migrated and relocated to places which boast of affording surfeit opportunities for better living conditions, and this ritual has continued into the modern times, and thus, there is nothing alarming about this pattern.    

In conclusion, although it may seem that affluent nations actively encourage skilled migration through attractive incentives and rob their destitute counterparts of their invaluable talent, this process profoundly reflects individual choice and global economic reality and is inevitable. 

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 

Amplifying environmental consciousness has prompted a suggestion about tackling rising traffic congestion and pollution through costly fuel. I completely disagree with this proposal and shall discuss the other plausible steps that can aid surmounting these issues.

To start with, it is wrongly assumed that by making propellants dearer would  dissuade a majority from purchasing petrol-driven vehicles; it would pose an unbearable economic burden, especially on the lower and middle income groups. Consequently, decreasing the number of cars on the road, easing traffic density, and eventually, mitigating emissions. 

However, those cynical of this suggestion assert that such initiatives lack substance and viability. There are areas sans public transport, due lack of proper roads, forcing people to use personal vehicles for commutes everyday, and thus, expensive fuel will only add to their woes, raising their expenditure. Moreover, the elite  - the majority users of personal four wheelers - will remain unaffected with higher prices, and will continue to buy fossil fuel driven vehicles, and a negligible minority of lower and middle income groups will face the wrath instead.  

There are a few practical measures that can be considered to surmount this pressing challenge. Investments  in better infrastructure: roads, which could connect most parts of urban locales effectively, can create motivation to forgo their own and switch to mass transit. Additionally, campaigns could be launched at various levels to engender enlightenment about the ramifications of pollution, and encourage resorting to public commutes and carpooling.  

To conclude, one cannot be lop-sided and push through impractical approaches. Many locations lack connectivity due to absence of roads, and such a proposal will not influence the affluent. The solution lies in investing into building roads, launching campaigns,  and stimulating participation from the society can aid in overcoming this challenge. 

These days, the issue of international marketing has grown its importance, especially in the world of manufacturing facilities and even education overseas or across the globe. While others believe that this would mean invasion and intrusion into the country’s traditional ways.

These days, the issue of international marketing has grown its importance, especially in the world of manufacturing facilities and even education overseas or across the globe. While others believe that this would mean invasion and intrusion into the country’s traditional ways.

In the contemporary globalised world, marketing initiatives have transcended political and geographical boundaries. While some consider this development to be quite favorable, others fear that this might cause dilution of native ways of life. I feel the concerns expressed are lacking in substance; this trend is creating opportunities for many. 

Those skeptical of this trend allege that it is going to interfere with local lifestyles, causing a clash between the age-old customs followed by a society and modern aspirations that are more global in nature, and persuading people, especially the youth, to abandon their beliefs. As per them, such activities tend to promote practices, attitudes, festivals and way of celebrations, among others, of cultures from where  such establishments hail. For example, many working or studying in such institutions complain about their festivals and holidays being ignored, and being persuaded to celebrate  international events.  

However, the former view is not well-founded because whenever any institution markets itself, it always assimilates with local populace to enhance their appeal and create a niche for themselves. Moreover, these endeavors are bolstering trade and employment because when an enterprise expands its outreach in the world, it creates more business and jobs for both: the hosts and the home country. Similarly, this is helping disseminate globally-accepted skills to students across the world, helping create a parity among inhabitants of various countries, which translates into greater opportunities for well-compensated jobs. Many credit their professional achievements to this system: it has exposed them to globally-acknowledged academic resources.  

In hindsight, although complications such as cultures being impacted detrimentally by being side-lined, have been observed, international marketing has been overwhelmingly favorable by virtue of engendering economic opportunities for entrepreneurs and professionals, and aspiring students, but Striking a balance between both could help harness benefits.   

Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

A great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with a view that medicine manufacturers should not advertise their products via mass media, while others disagree and believe that such information is vital for enlightening the public. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.

To start with,  a lobby strongly believes that this strategy encourages self-assessment, which could be erroneous. This is to say, people might wrongly assume that they have a certain illness since the symptoms shown on the television matches their own, precipitating perilous situations, where the ailing consumes drugs without proper professional investigation, resulting in doing more harm than good. 

Moreover, such companies prioritize commercialization over health, endangering human lives by exaggerating benefits or hiding side-effects. For example, a recent survey revealed that many pharma businesses promote their drugs by over stating the merits of their product and obfuscating its adverse reactions, causing the symptoms of disease to amplify rather than alleviate.

Having said that, a group hypothesizes that drug advertisements could disseminate knowledge widely, engendering awareness about the up-to-date medications, treatments and diseases. To corroborate, in Japan, regular adverts on radio help citizens stay updated regarding the ailments and related medical interventions available at the nearby hospitals. Additionally, many can be benefited by early detection of underlying medical conditions and pay a visit to a doctor for proper check-ups. Furthermore, ads on mental illness and its remedies can encourage the afflicted to open up about their conditions and seek help by eliminating the stigma related to it.

In conclusion, disputes aside, I believe that such broadcasting information about medical formulations can be beneficial to some extent, but only if effectively  controlled and regulated  to ensure accuracy, and prevent manipulation.

Universal health insurance is bad because healthy people should not have to pay money to help sick people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Universal health insurance is bad because healthy people should not have to pay money to help sick people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A general perception is emerging that social health insurance is not reasonable and people with excellent health should not pay for sick counterparts. I completely disagree with this statement and shall discuss in the following paragraphs.

To start with, a lobby hypothesizes that one should not bear the  brunt of extending treatment for the ailing since the responsibility lies on the shoulders of governments. They have the means and resources to dispense available medical interventions for the betterment of those afflicted by health issues. Moreover, this system can make many, especially youngsters, bereft from saving for their autumn years, or emergencies; consequently, making their future bleak. For example, in Japan, a recent survey revealed that many are unable to accumulate enough for their retirement since most of the income is being directed towards universal insurance.

Having said that, a group strongly asserts that ‘as you sow so shall you reap’. If one starts funding for those suffering from ill-health today, in the future someone will do the same for them too. This kindness will precipitate an ever-lasting loop of support for each other. Similarly, the world is facing unprecedented incidence of disease, and their treatments are exorbitantly priced, mainly for the destitute populace. This arrangement will aid many in alleviating the monetary burden and afford treatments. To corroborate, many in France pay a substantial amount for the healthcare on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, helping a number of destitute ill to avail suitable medical treatments.

To conclude, disputes aside, everyone should pay for unified national health insurance since it will enable creation of a socially assuring   network and  allow many to afford treatments - rather than abandoning them - and such gestures will surely have reciprocal results for the payers.

In many countries, companies hire more men than women for certain positions. Some people believe that employers should be required to recruit equal numbers of men and women in every field. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In many countries, companies hire more men than women for certain positions. Some people believe that employers should be required to recruit equal numbers of men and women in every field. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the  issue of whether gender bias should be relinquished while  hiring personnel because many businesses still resort to selecting more men compared to women. I strongly feel that employment  should be afforded on the basis of abilities rather than sex-based selection. 

A lobby strongly asserts that recruiting an individual should be based on qualification not on gender. One should have essential degrees and certifications to prove their worth to occupy a certain position. If one does not have specific education - whether male or female, they will be unable to do justice to the duties related to the job. As a result, this will create problems for themselves, as well as for employers. 

Additionally, skills should enjoy greater precedence over gender. One with appropriate requisite skills and seasoning  should  be prioritized over the idea of embracing gender-specific or gender-neutral approach: the former hold greater relevance in functions critical to operations. For example, in fields such as robotics and medicine, only profound knowhow and relevant experience can help deal with on-hand problems, and present optimum solutions.

Furthermore, the focus should be on assessing the approach rather than just evaluating a job aspirant on the basis of their sex. Many modern organizations have started shortlisting new entrants on the basis of psychological assessment and psychometric tests, which aid them in evaluating the reactions to challenges, approaches espoused to surmount those, and problem-solving capabilities  of prospective employees, and  in these examinations, they rarely ask for gender descriptions.  

In conclusion, disputes apart, while choosing the candidate, businesses should focus on education, skills and psychological capacities, rather than whether they are males or females. This will truly help in blurring gender differences, and present equitable opportunities to both sexes.