Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing, innovation, science and technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with?

Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing, innovation, science and technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with?

There is a fierce debate going on about where the state should focus more. While some feel that priority should be given to discovering innovative technologies, others suggest that it is critical to afford fundamental amenities to the needy populace. I believe that the former view holds substance as it holds the key to the future of a nation.  

In  the  fast-paced contemporary world it has become essential to lay emphasis on advancement in every sphere of life, be it producing food through agriculture; serving citizens through civic amenities, like water, sewage, electricity, and  so forth; or be it  providing quality education and healthcare. Without lodging progress it will be hard for a society to survive because outdated methods do not only cost heavily to operate but also are prone to accidents and failure. This can make societies increasingly dependent on external support in the form of importing replacements and necessary equipment from other countries, costing policy makers dearly in the form of invaluable foreign exchange, and leaving countries poor. 

Similarly, giving preference to modernization is an insurance for a safe and comfortable future for the upcoming generations because investments made today will help them immensely. They will be born in the culture that promotes research, innovation and finding new methodologies, and thus, will be able to consistently work to improve their surroundings, lifestyles and their approach, bringing them enduring success and wealth.

To conclude, it can be said that policy makers should harbour a pragmatic view, and look towards the future as the efforts put in the concurrent times will create opportunities for the present occupants, and also help ensure that the succeeding generation is able to lead for comfortable life.  

Children should play Indoor games on the computer more than outdoor games. Do you agree or disagree with the statement ?

Children should play Indoor games on the computer more than outdoor games. Do you agree or disagree with the statement ? 

The perception that juveniles should play games on computers at home more than going outside to play, is a topic that invites a fierce debate. While these offer certain advantages, they cannot supersede their outdoor counterparts. I fail to concur with this; outdoor games should not be overshadowed by indoor ones. 

Technology-based games have their merits, particularly in developing cognitive and technical skills. Many of these aim at bolstering problem-solving abilities, strategic thinking and hand eye coordination. Additionally, engaging with these can help young minds familiarize with digital environments, an essential requirement for progressive future careers. Moreover, certain multiplayer online games allow them to socialize with others virtually. 

However, those disapproving the former practice assert that it will deprive growing individuals of the benefits of playing games outside can fetch, especially when considering physical, mental and social development. While indulging in undertakings  in a playing field, encourages one to indulge in physical exercise, helping them stay fit and healthy. In contrast, too much time spent playing computer games can lead to a sedentary lifestyle, increasing the risk of obesity and other health problems like poor posture or weak eyesight.

Involvement in games played in open surroundings like playgrounds can foster social skills through face-to face interactions with peers. Sports like soccer, basketball, or even playground activities, teach juveniles about effective communication, cooperation and negotiating competition, which is essential for their emotional and social growth. In comparison, the social interaction of computer games are often limited to virtual spaces, lacking the richness of personal connection.

In conclusion, while computer games have their own relevance, holistic benefits of indulging in outdoor undertakings, that youngsters can reap, will be given a miss. Thus, this practice should not be promoted, and  instead a balanced approach should be embraced.   

Some people think that robots are very important to human’s future development. Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion with relevant examples from your experience.

Some people think that robots are very important to human’s future development. Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion with relevant examples from your experience. 

There is a general perception that robots will play a vital role in the future and  bring rich yields, while some believe that these will have detrimental impact on mankind. 

On the effulgent side, autonomous machines hold several promises: they will save humans from hazardous circumstances such as working in locations that can present threat to life like in mines, nuclear plants, near volcanoes, underwater, and in areas plagued with infectious diseases. For example, these self-operated  equipment played a critical role during the Covid-19 pandemic, in terms of serving the patients in various parts of the world, in every possible way, including diagnosing the extent of infection, dispensing medicine to the ailing, in times when health professional were unable to actively take part, protecting their lives eventually. It can be ascertained that in the future, this apparatus will replace people in more and more jobs that carry hazards. 

Moreover, some individuals also believe that these devices can  help doing multiple tasks and generate better outcomes while correcting the  errors automatically. Furthermore,  these machines can  aid in freeing people of tedious tasks like driving since they can do all the tasks without requiring any human involvement. Consequently, they will bring convenience.  

Nevertheless, the other lobby is concerned and feels that automation will take away jobs, take unemployment to unimaginable levels, and impact the economies adversely, and force people to live in poverty.  More and more organizations will embrace these advanced technologies to speed-up the work, and replace workers with them, causing rampant joblessness among the unskilled, semi-skilled and skilled sections. 

To conclude, although these devices have various drawbacks: pushing many out of jobs, affecting impoverished nations more profoundly, I personally believe that automated equipment will surely bring rich dividends, in the form of safety and convenience. 

Some people think that robots are very important to human’s future development. Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion with relevant examples from your experience.

Some people think that robots are very important to human’s future development. Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion with relevant examples from your experience. 

They are critical 

• These  machines can guarantee a long term solution for complex becoming work processes that need speed 
• Can perform repetitive tasks consistently 
• precision and uniformity: humans will need the work to be more precise since every sphere of human life is likely to become more sophisticated 
• Safety is what these machines can render to humans since these devices can even work in hazardous and those environment  which are beyond the reach of mankind
• economical: these machines are capable of working without needing extra overheads 

 They are dangerous and have negative effects on society. 

• Unemployment. These are likely to cause large joblessness  
• Loss of skills: humans will forget their skills and abilities 
• They depend on an external power source and if that does not become available due to some reasons, humans will become helpless 
• These machines can be easily manipulated and hacked and used against humans 

Some commentators believe that robots will have positive outcomes in the upcoming time by helping humans in several ways, whereas the other lobby dissents, and believes that these will have adverse effects. I will analyze both the views profoundly in the following paragraphs, and share a plausible conclusion.

Automated machines will play a pivotal role in the life of mankind as these will render quick service with accuracy. Such devices will require an informative command to start processing their work and complete their task seamlessly(smoothly), within the given time, keeping the accuracy on the top. By virtue of this, the life of the people will become convenient, as they will no longer be occupied with their daily regimes, and will have a solution to get it done without errors.To exemplify, a study by an eminent scientist professor Dr. Karl Of Capilano University, states that with the advent of technology, working women will be able to get time for themselves by assigning the duties to these self-operated devices, and get the output without hassles. 

Nevertheless, the other lobby is quite skeptical, and professes that becoming dependent on these apparatus will expose human beings to unemployment; and make them lose their ability to work manually. For instance, an article published by a proficient author Mr. Malik, in the New York Times, claims that inclusion of technology in various areas  will create joblessness as businesses will prefer machines over humans. Moreover, people will stop using their skills, exposing themselves to serious challenges in case these intelligent machines become unavailable.   

Overall, I vehemently feel that these electronic devices will make life of humans easy by removing the burden of performing monotonous tasks even though these might also create joblessness, but this can be overcome by reskilling workers. 

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

Surviving in an alien environment without knowledge of local language can pose severe hurdles in various paradigms: 

• Knowing about local customs and ways of life can become a difficult job; thus, never allowing migrants to effectively integrate with surroundings 
• Youngsters find it harder to settle down since they are unable to mingle with their native peers and often are subjected to slur 
• Finding work can become an extremely arduous job 
• Surviving in alien surroundings can be an onerous task: finding directions, knowing about places 

No issues arise today   

• Virtual interpreters can help a great deal in overcoming linguistic barriers. 
• Systems like GPS and google maps can help people find directions
• Migrants go well prepared to handle such issues and try to overcome the barriers using their intellect with enthusiasm

Residing in an alien country can be an extremely onerous endeavor if one is unfamiliar with the native tongue, by virtue of encountering a myriad of challenges: establishing friendships with locals, and many more. I subscribe to this notion and elucidate more details in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, one major concern that people, with linguistic incompatibility, might face when trying to settle in an alien country, is harnessing employment opportunities because of the lack of ability to communicate effectively with host employers. This can be corroborated by a survey conducted  by Toronto Sun to assess the employment status of new entrants into Canada that revealed startling facts that over thirty percent of migrants  were unable to  land well-compensated jobs that complemented their qualifications due to them not being able to use English, or French effectively  

Similarly, youngone are the worst sufferers since when they move to an alien region, they find it difficult to interact with the hosts, and consequently, they are badly bullied by their peers in colleges, universities and offices, making them vulnerable to mental complications. Similarly, due to unfamiliar tongues, one might find it onerous to socialize with the locals and take any part in social gatherings, making them feel alienated.

However, things have changed tremendously and made available tools that help transcend barriers posed by lack of knowledge  of native language:  nowadays, there are numerous technologies and apps like duolingo and google translator that assist one in interacting with others seamlessly. Similarly,   many now before relocating, update themselves about the language used in the destination societies. 

To conclude, although one might encounter some problems while relocating to an alien country, due to linguistic incompatibilities, nowadays due to advancement of  technologies, one can effortlessly communicate and adapt to alien societies.  

Some people believe that traditional and cultural values and behaviour will gradually disappear as societies become more modern. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that traditional and cultural values and behaviour will gradually disappear as societies become more modern. Do you agree or disagree?

Agree 

• Global identity means, shedding native beliefs and rituals, and other things like music; 
• This is also fueled by consumerism and global appeal of entertainment, consumer goods and cultural unification 
• Rapid urbanization that is exposing people to new ways of life which has little room for traditional lifestyles   

Disagree 

• The cultural aspirations have held steadfast, and have instead adapted themselves to modern times without losing their authenticity 
• Even families living in nuclear settings are ensuring that their next generation is well-informed about the beliefs endemic to their communities
• Social media has made it possible to promulgate local beliefs 

While some fear that the shifting paradigm in all walks of life may cause traditional beliefs to die, this notion lacks conviction as advancement is instead bringing people closer to their customs, helping ensure that these will continue to exist.

Those  alleging that the advent of fresh aspirations and alterations are going to unfavorably impact native ways of life, profess that this phenomenon has promoted a global identity in all spheres: language, clothing, festivals and food, among others. This has led to many, especially the young generation, to abandon their own traditions, and very soon the latter will diminish. However, this perception is misconceived; even the youth can clearly differentiate between foreign and their own lifestyles, and successfully maneuver between the two. 

Nevertheless, the progress has rather reinvigorated the dying conventional ceremonies. The availability of state-of-the-art tools and applications has allowed perpetuation of cultural practices, and community leaders are able to conduct a profound research on their traditional systems and enlighten the populace at large, engaging it more actively. To corroborate, social media has become a vehicle of proliferating information about the festivities, and rationale behind observing them, widely, convincing even the strongest critics of traditionalism to celebrate events.

Moreover, parents, despite living in nuclear family settings, are involving their progeny in rituals, celebrations, and learning about cultural and religious aspects. For instance, children are regularly sent to attend classes imparting knowledge of scriptures, folk dance and music, and so forth, and participate in communal programs and processions, to educate them about their indigenous routines.

In hindsight, the concerns about local beliefs being pushed into extinction by progressive thought processes and global aspirations, are completely unfounded; technology and the intent to practice the culture, are going to ensure that the traditional ways will always exist.          

Some people believe that students should be required to wear uniforms in school, while others argue that uniforms restrict individuality and self-expression. What is your opinion?

Some people believe that students should be required to wear uniforms in school, while others argue that uniforms restrict individuality and self-expression. What is your opinion? 

The general perception is emerging that like pupils must don the official clothing in schools, but others voice their disagreement saying this restricts distinctiveness and personal traits. This essay will shed some light on both perspectives and share a viable opinion. 

To start with, a lobby strongly propounds that school attire conveys discipline. In other words, when all the learners are clothed in the same manner, it showcases routine and control; consequently, turning them into responsible adults in the future. For example, a recent survey revealed that those adhering to a regular school ensemble code, grow into well-mannered and self-controlled adults.

Moreover, this arrangement helps dilute the socioeconomic barriers among classmates hailing from disparate backgrounds, engendering harmony, promoting a sense of cohesion, and pushing all to pursue one goal: to attain success through education. To corroborate, in Japan, since everyone sports the school attire, young minds are focussed on learning rather than thinking about whether their classmates are rich or poor. Similarly, school is a place to gain education, and rendering liberty to wear what one likes would turn the schooling environment  into a place  for fashion shows, wherein everyone will be found flaunting outfits in front of their peers. 

Having said that, a group of skepticals feel this can limit creativity since this not only demotivates one and  curtails their ability to express freely but also impedes creativity, allowing diverse  dressing styles can make the environment  of the formal tuition vibrant. However, this view is hanging by a thread, lacks  substance, and hence, it should be ignored.

In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, I believe that there should be a permanent standard dress for the students since such practices imbibe discipline and eliminate social and economic differences among them.

Some argue that teachers should focus on academics more than motivating students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some argue that teachers should focus on academics more than motivating students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A common perception that educators are responsible for delivering syllabus rather than persuading learners, evokes mixed responses: while some support this, others reject it. The following paragraphs shall profoundly delve into this matter and share a logical conclusion. 

To start with, undeniably, academic knowledge always provides a strong foundation, which is essential in shaping the future of the learners. Those with a commendable education track record are always preferred when seeking opportunities in higher education, like appearing for competitive exams, or enrolling in renowned universities and colleges. To illustrate, those being exposed to strict academic pursuit while in school, are able to crack competitive exams like GMAT, effortlessly. Not only this, they can develop invaluable academic skills, besides traits such as public speaking, problem-solving, and critical thinking, to name a few, helping them settle in their desired careers successfully. 

However, those skeptical about this approach assert that encouraging young learners is equally important. Motivated learners tend to be more attentive, curious, and creative. They always try to think out of the box, to learn new skills and subject matter. Moreover, it is a natural phenomenon when educators inspire young minds, they are instilling critical traits of perseverance in them, keeping them positive till the completion of the task and not surrendering when faced with small debacles and hurdles.  A study has shown that when people are persuaded to keep going, they become enthusiastic in chasing their goals, and they influence their classmates too, by creating a positive environment around them. 

To recap, a balanced approach is recommended: it  can do wonders in tailoring the future of children by laying a strong foundation of education, inspiring them to pursue their objectives enthusiastically, something pivotal to attain pinnacles in life. 

There is a profound debate raging among varied sections of society about whether teachers should prioritise education over motivation. Some subscribe to the notion that the focus should be on academic syllabus and not on acting as motivators, while others dissent. I will critically analyze this matter in the following paragraphs and share my opinion about it.

In contemporary times, most people believe that education plays a vital role in shaping the scholastic abilities of students and teachers should only focus on it, while others think that encouraging the learne

rs is also important. The following paragraphs shall delve into the matter deeply. 

Some people believe that artificial intelligence will replace most human jobs in the future, while others think it will create more opportunities than problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that artificial intelligence will replace most human jobs in the future, while others think it will create more opportunities than problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 

The rapid proliferation of automation has ensued a fierce public discourse, with some suspect this shift causing joblessness, others contending it would usher in a brighter era with openings galore. This essay will discuss both the notions, and conclude with a well-reasoned opinion.

Some see the introduction of AI as a serious threat for humans across a cross-section of skills, especially the semi-skilled; they might lose their jobs and face impoverishment. This introduction, despite being a recent development, has evolved rapidly, leading to significant numbers being laid off. For example, a growing number of legal firms are embracing AI-driven applications, and have started relying on these innovative facilities for various tasks: drafting, vetting, and so forth, which was formerly handled by fresh law graduates, resulting in them becoming jobless

Nevertheless, artificial intelligence is laden with opportunities, rather than being a menace. Notwithstanding its ability to perform numerous tasks, this state-of-the-art technology fails to render real facts and figures, underpinning the need to deploy human intelligence on various positions. Additionally, several occupations view this self-driven application as an assistant for their employees, and not a replacement, as is the case in the field of medicine, where it aids in bolstering precision. For example, a number of surveys have shown that, organisations that encourage the usage of AI for a variety of tasks, have been able to engender a stress free and positive working culture, enhancing productivity. 

In conclusion, although automation may supersede some skills, especially at lower levels of organizational hierarchy, it is bound to produce several advantages: bolstering efficiency and assisting employees with daily tasks, outshining the challenges it poses. Every new innovation receives the same response, populated by fear, but is gradually absorbed, so it is also expected to be accepted slowly but firmly. 

It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not at all necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.

It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not at all necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.

 Several commentators profess that to excel in commercial endeavors one does not need to be professionally qualified, while others dissent with it. I will analyse this matter in upcoming paragraphs and draw a plausible conclusion.

Professional  education provides a strong foundation in business programmes such as marketing, risk analysis and finance management, among others. These basics provide all the knowledge to excel in business. Also, these educational institutions provide practical training and workshops in companies, where students consolidate their classroom knowledge, and learn to implement their knowledge in a real time environment. Moreover, networking opportunities are the greatest possibility where trainees can explore meeting alumni, investors, and successful entrepreneurs.

Nevertheless, there are businessmen who do not possess any professional degrees, or even some are college or school dropouts. They run their business empire on their experiences, and on their innate qualities. Ratan Tata, Dhirubhai Ambani, Mark Zuckerberg, to name a few, are a few specimens that support the notion that talent, inborn qualities, skills and creativity do not require any formal education. They just need a place and opportunity to showcase their abilities. 

Moreover, triumphant commercial endeavors needs problem solving skills, quick and right decision-making skills, something not taught in academic institutions. A survey conducted in California University revealed that business programmes only teach the basic principles which help individuals to land a good job to lead in a business, but not the traits to initiate a new business at the ground level, or to make it successful. 

To cap it, I do agree with the statement as success in business only depends on the experience, qualities, practical abilities. However, there is nothing bad in pursuing formal degrees as one can get to know about the business fundamentals underlying the globalized modern business paradigm.

Academic achievement at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Academic achievement  at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Academic achievement is often regarded as a reliable indicator of intellectual ability: performance at school or university is the only valid measure of intelligence .However, I firmly disagree with this viewpoint,as intelligence extends far beyond formal educational success.

Educational  institutions primarily evaluate logical reasoning,memory,and linguistic or mathematical skills. Students excelling in examinations often demonstrate strong analytical thinking and discipline. For example, individuals exhibiting their exceptional abilities in subjects such as mathematics or science are typically perceived as possessing  high levels of problem-solving ability. However, intelligence is a far broader concept than simply scoring in standardised assessments.

Many forms of intelligence are not captured by academic grading systems.According to psychologist Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligence, people may excel in areas such as musical, interpersonal, spatial,or body-kinaesthetic intelligence. A talented musician, athlete, or entrepreneur, may not achieve top academic grades, yet their abilities clearly reveal high levels of creativity, emotional understanding, or strategic thinking. To corroborate, successful business leaders often rely more on emotional intelligence, communication skills, and practical decision making than on academic credentials alone .

Moreover, conventional education often rewards memorisation and conformity, rather than originality or innovative thinking. History provides numerous examples of individuals who struggled academically but later revolutionised their fields through vision and ingenuity.This demonstrates that genius cannot be confined to formal educational performance. For instance, inventors like Edison, Einstein, and so forth, were either  average performers, or school drop-outs, but innovations brought forth by them, revolutionised the world, and today, highly-educated experts are just replicating their concepts.    

In conclusion, while academic success may indicate certain intellectual strengths, it is not the definitive measure. Intellectual capabilities are multifaceted,encompassing creativity and other factors.Judging intelligence solely on academic achievement, therefore, offers an incomplete and narrow perspective.

There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? Discuss.

There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? Discuss.

Music has always been an integral part of human life. It is a universal language that nobody needs to learn. However, it is the debatable topic which genre holds more relevance: indigenous or global. The following paragraphs intend to assess the significance of this form of art and conclude which type has more influence. 

Music is food for the soul; it helps people to express their feelings, emotions when words are not enough, or when others are not comfortable in sharing their thoughts.  It also works as therapy: alleviating stress, bolstering concentration and focus. Apart from that, it is also the best exercise for weight loss: many use it as a medium to support their dance exercise routines.

Some advocate the importance of native music; it is a symbol of local culture and heritage, which helps one to connect to their roots and know more about their traditions. A survey conducted in California University revealed that 40% of young generations sourced their knowledge about their rituals and ways of life from this form of art only either by listening, or by watching the content supporting it.

Nevertheless, some assert that universal music has been gaining traction due to technological advancements. It allows people to experience diverse types, and acts as a platform for bringing disparate ethnicities together, fostering a sense of belongingness to global ways of life and aspirations, helping build harmony by inspiring the global populace to sport a uniform expression rather than distinctiveness.   

To conclude, this form of art has always existed to support mankind in different ways, and all its genres enjoy distinct relevance; thus, comparison is irrelevant. Each music genre has their own importance, but one should always stay connected with their local music as it preserves their culture and values. 

People who decide on a career early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People who decide on a career early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is commonly perceived that choosing a professional domain at a young age and following it through life fetches more contentment than switching employment. I would analyze this notion critically and share the verdict in the following paragraphs.

To start with, those who stick to the same employment over many years tend to develop expertise in their subject matter: they foster dexterity in surmounting challenges at their work. Moreover, it provides them a sense of security in terms of job, work culture adaptation, financial stability, job satisfaction and promotions, allowing them to plan other domains of their life with more certainty. A survey revealed that nearly 45% of employees do not change their career path and they disclosed that they have been able to make good investments. 

Nevertheless, the other lobby has different opinions and asserts that there are humongous benefits of hopping jobs: one is not overwhelmed by monotony at their workplace by doing repeated tasks, and instead experience freshness, by earning themselves a chance to learn new skills. When one changes  jobs on a frequent basis, they are exposed to new work environment that persuades new learning, enhancing their industry visibility, making them industrially mobile. 

Likewise,  this can also bring a quick pay rise, and many times advancements in job positions. An interview conducted by New York Times that involved employees of Big four MNCS revealed that forty percent of youngsters aged from 26 to 31 were able to secure higher designations, including senior managers and Vice Presidents, due to versatile background experience.  

To cap it, I would say,  although deciding a career path early on is an individual prerogative, a balanced approach shall be the ideal where one can decide it by considering long term ambitions, and evolving job market. 

 

Some people believe that family is more important than friends. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that family is more important than friends. Do you agree or disagree?

Although friends and family have their own significance in life, some give precedence to the latter, making it imperative to evaluate the relevance of this perception. However, I align myself with this, and shall bolster my stand in the following paragraphs.   

To start with, a lobby strongly asserts that the family is permanent and constant. This is to say, parents and siblings stay forever and incessantly, rendering happiness, and a sense of belongingness, unlike others, however close they may be, become associated and get detached going in life many times. Moreover, mothers and fathers lay the foundation of values in their wards: cultural, life, and social, aiding in shaping the persona and future of the younger ones. For example, a recent survey revealed that people render the plinth of principles by imbibing their progeny with cultural and life traditions, thereby supporting their holistic development. 

Similarly, a group of social behaviorists propounds that families afford support, especially during the time of crises. Despite having altercations and arguments, one can find them by their side, whenever the need arises, something others cannot do: one misunderstanding can spoil relationships. Nevertheless, one can always find them close, lending hands whenever it is needed: financially or emotionally. Furthermore, elders act as a beacon of righteous path through guidance, helping one in circumventing the hideous ways; consequently, reaching success with a few errors. To corroborate, in Japan, many seek guidance from their elders before starting a new venture, eliminating the risk and chances of failure, something none can give.

In conclusion, the familial environment is extremely critical, and thus,  holds more relevance than any other relation since parents and siblings are long-lasting, are available during emergencies, and render a solid foundation of values, and invaluable learning.

  

Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The debate over achieving success being influenced by fate, or personal efforts is quite profound and fierce. While some argue that the former factor plays a crucial role in achieving goals, others contend that hard work, determination, and skills are far more important. I would like to elucidate both the views with a plausible conclusion.

Destiny, as they say,  can undoubtedly impact the path to attainments. External factors, such as being born into a supportive family, encountering the right opportunities at the right time, or meeting influential individuals, can sometimes accelerate the path to triumph. To exemplify, several accomplished entrepreneurs have had fortuitous moments where a chance meeting, or unforeseen event changed their career trajectories. In these cases, stars played a key role in striving towards objectives.

Having said that, fortune  alone is rarely enough for a majority in their endeavor towards pinnacle. One requires determination, perseverance and consistent hard work to turn the table on adversities and surmount hurdles preventing them from gaining their intended targets. Many,  such as Steve Jobs, admitted fulfilling their aspirations by preparing themselves extensively, recognizing,  and capitalizing on opportunities when they arose. 

On top of that, as per Thomas Edison, “Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration,” emphasizes that it is the efforts and hard work that enable one to realize their desires. To illustrate, athletes winning championships might experience lucky breaks, but behind their achievements are countless hours of dedication and toil.

To recapitulate, while luck can be instrumental in achieving aims in some cases, it is mostly through relentless endeavors, persistence and skills that individuals realize their ambitions. It is those who are prepared and willing to work hard make the most of the opportunities that come their way. 

People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effect does it have on an individual and on society?

People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effect does it have on an individual and on society?

Sleeping less / sleep deprivation/ depriving oneself of sleep/ shorter sleep duration/ hitting the bed later than before/ sacrificing sleep  

Causes 

• Overwhelming professional or academic obligations that keep people tied to their work for longer hours, and sometimes, they carry their work home 
• Socializing when one is free 
• Dedicating free time, that should be otherwise spent sleeping, to engaging with technology 
• Smoking 
• Sedentary lifestyle: lack of physical activity makes people prone to disturbed  
• Mental ailments such as depression 
• Noisy neighborhoods, especially those living near the main roads and clubs and party venues, suffer from this problem 

Effect 

• Lack of concentration, and Perennial drowsiness affecting productivity at work and studies 
• Makes people age faster 
• Ailments such as hypertension can afflict such people 
• Irritability that causes one to lose temperament quickly, resulting in impulsive behavior 
• Pick up fights with those around 
• Hazards while driving   

Poor work-life balance and daunting work and academic demand-led sleep deprivation has become a new normal today,  but presents myriad complications to the affected individuals and those around them.

The  primary driver of this rapidly proliferating propensity, or rather the compulsion, is meeting professional obligations within deadlines, mandating devoting extra hours at work, and even carrying assignments home. This is generally done at the cost of sleep duration - progressively shrinking considerably - and both professionals and students are prone to this circumstance. To corroborate, nearly seventy percent of urbanites world over, working or studying, complain about their jobs and education interfering with their sleeping routine.

Similarly, the urge to socialize and indulge with technology are other major sources of the motivation to stay awake longer than before. To exemplify, as per the report of the US Health department, almost every age group, across the world, is inclined to attending parties, watching television, playing computer games, and browsing social media, among others, even during wee hours, resulting in sleep deficit.

However, this behaviour is making people susceptible to unwarranted challenges:  disruptions in circadian pattern, resulting from missing sleep can severely impact physical and mental wellbeing. Sleeplessness causes weakened digestion and appetites; lack of concentration; forgetfulness and irritable attitudes, and predisposes one to ailments, like hyper-tension, and diminishing performance. These factors  also jeopardize the safety of others - road users and coworkers, impacting national productivity and health. For instance, the majority of mishaps on the roads, and in factories and offices are linked to drowsy drivers and operators.     

In hindsight, the current penchant for forgoing sleep is bolstered by overwhelming work and academic pressure, and strong cravings for socializing and technology-driven entertainment, but is having dire consequences for health and social environment, demanding quick attention, and appropriate solutions.

People working at higher levels in the companies should be paid more than the workers at lower levels. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People working at higher levels in the companies should be paid more than the workers at lower levels. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The perception that individuals working at higher-levels being paid more than lower levels evokes mixed responses. While some suggest that those placed in near to the top in hierarchical ranks bear colossal responsibilities, and thus, are deserving candidates for better compensation, but others contest.  

Employees in prominent positions typically carry extensive experience, advanced education, and specialized skills that are essential for managing departments and companies. They make strategic decisions, handle crises, and are accountable for the overall direction of the business. For example a CEO must assess market trends, manage investor relations and steer the organization towards long-term success. These tasks require significant expertise and are laden with overwhelming responsibilities, which justify higher compensation. 

Moreover, they are often vulnerable to spending longer hours at work, whether tied to their cubicles, or traveling for the sake of their organization. This takes a toll on their personal and social life, whereas those in lower positions are expected to fulfill their trade-specific responsibilities and head for home,  justifying better remuneration for those undertaking stressful endeavors. To corroborate, marketing managers often circumvent their personal and social obligations and burn midnight oil by working for extended hours, at the office or in the field. 

However, the skeptics term it as unjust; those working at lower-levels are equally relevant. They help ensure that day-to-day operations run smoothly, thereby contributing to organizational success tangibly. For instance, in a manufacturing company, production workers are directly responsible for creating the products that generate revenue. Without their contribution, even the most brilliant strategies formulated at higher levels would fail.

In conclusion, while compensating managerial personnel better is mandatory due to the complexity and responsibility involved in their roles, companies must ensure that those at lower ranks are compensated fairly; their contributions must also be acknowledged. 

Tipping is a common practice at restaurants in many countries. Some people believe tipping is a great way to show service workers you appreciate them, while others believe it should be the responsibility of the boss or company to pay their workers. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Tipping is a common practice at restaurants in many countries. Some people believe tipping is a great way to show service workers you appreciate them, while others believe it should be the responsibility of the boss or company to pay their workers. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

While some hail the customers rewarding servers in restaurants financially for their services, others believe that it is the onus of owners to compensate. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.

To start with,  a lobby asserts that rewarding waiters monetarily helps express gratitude for their work since the service industry is difficult to work in, and most are underpaid. Such gestures bolster motivation and support financially. Moreover, getting paid supplementary via customers uplifts the mood and the spirit of the staff aiding in fostering an incessant feeling of happiness, reinforcing their commitment to raise their standards of  facilitating guests. For example, a recent survey revealed that this tradition has always acted as an inducement for service staff at eateries to be meticulous and polite in their dealings with visitors

Having said that, those skeptical propound that diners are not the ones to pay extra, this obligation rests on the shoulders of the companies. This is to say, the final cheque includes the service fee, which the consumers have already paid; consequently, making it mandatory for the owners to pay it to the stewards. Similarly, the organisations in this industry are earning colossal amounts of profits, making them liable to share some with their staff in form of bonuses. This demonstrates appreciation towards the dedication of the workforce, making them enjoy their work and stay compliant with norms of serving clients.

To conclude, considering the aforementioned views, I believe tipping the server is a choice and it should not be forced on the customer, but the owners should definitely pay their personnel additionally for their unswerving devotion to their tasks.

Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become unlivable due to pollution and overcrowding. Others think technological innovation will solve these problems. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become unlivable due to pollution and overcrowding. Others think technological innovation will solve these problems. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

A general perception is emerging among the environmentally conscious that urban locales will turn uninhabitable; they are bursting to  their seams, and are plagued by pollution, but others exude optimism about the-state-of-the-art technology helping surmount these issues, turning this matter into a debatable issue. 

To start with, many feel that laden with carbon dioxide exhaust fumes from vehicles are augmenting, due to  the burning of colossal amounts of fossil fuels; consequently, the air is becoming unbreathable, precipitating respiratory ailments: asthma, lung infections and so on, and the circumstances are  likely to  exacerbate in next few years. Moreover, an ever-growing population is demanding space for accommodation, engendering a dearth of land for housing, and as things are progressing, the competition for living space is going to become steeper, making it hard  for future urbanites to afford reasonable dwelling. 

Having said that, some see  light at the  end of the tunnel, and propose that umpteen scientific and research endeavors are being undertaken to ease the pressure on cities and improve living conditions. In Japan, automobile companies are foraying into new technological realms and working on air-propelled engines, which will be cheap; and operate on renewable, and non-polluting natural material. 

Similarly, vertically-oriented buildings: skyscrapers, for residence are fast becoming a new normal in major metropolises, superseding the conventional space-intensive horizontal arrangements,  promising rendering homes to remarkably larger demography than today, without forcing policy makers and urban authorities to resort to unsustainable practice of deforestation, and helping restore greenery and mitigate pollution.  

To conclude, I believe that paranoia being promulgated by pessimism should be brushed aside;  the upcoming years seem to be holding brighter prospects, by the virtue of being fueled by technological advancements, and it can be said urban surroundings will be a better place to live in.  

Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest of our lives, while others believe that adult life brings more happiness. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest of our lives, while others believe that adult life brings more happiness. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The question of whether the teenage years, or adulthood, represent the most enjoyable phase of life has long been debated. Both periods afford unique experiences that contribute to  fulfilment, and their significance varies based on personal circumstances and priorities.

Adolescents often experience a carefree existence that is largely free from major responsibilities. With their primary focus on education, they have more opportunities for leisure, friendship and exploration. One passing through this stage is filled with enthusiasm, curiosity, and the excitement of trying new things:  hobbies, sports, or even the first romantic rendezvous. 

Furthermore, one enjoys being the center of attraction for all social gatherings, and functions, as friends of parents, relatives and cousins are keen to meet them. For instance, attending school events, or simply spending time with peers, can create cherishable memories. However, this stage is not without its challenges, including academic pressure, identity struggles, and the need to navigate emotional changes. 

Nevertheless,  adulthood offers independence, stability and the ability to make meaningful life choices. Many find satisfaction in pursuing careers, raising families, and achieving personal goals. Adults often have the financial autonomy to travel, purchase homes, or indulge in hobbies, bringing them a sense of accomplishment and contentment. For instance, successfully completing a major project at work, or raising children can bring profound happiness. However, the pressures of balancing at work, finance and familial obligations can sometimes overshadow these joys.

In conclusion, both stages offer distinct avenues for happiness, each accompanied by its own set of vulnerabilities. Adolescence thrives on the thrill of new exposures, while adulthood is often defined by a deeper sense of fulfilment through achievements and relationships. Eventually, the happiest stage depends on individual prerogatives, circumstances, and how one embraces opportunities each phase renders.

Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The  contemporary era has brought an unprecedented abundance of alternatives in every imaginable walk of life. I accede to this notion in absolute terms and shall elucidate my stand in the following paragraphs. 

One prominent area where there are surfeit options, is the availability of food, clothing and other consumer goods. Modern markets are flooded with an extensive range of products and services that appeal to diverse segments. For instance, there are myriad brands like Apple, Samsung, Redmi, selling smartphones addressing financial credentials, needs of  features and latest updates in technology. This variety, propelled by improvements in production methods, allows individuals to select goods that suit their typical requirements conveniently.  

Furthermore, those craving for diverse gastronomic experiences have everything available at their disposal. Now, they can enjoy umpteen varieties of food from all over the globe in their own hometowns. For example, brands like Subway, Dominos and chain restaurants, to name a few, have afforded alternatives to everyone, and one does not have to resign to the same monotonous nourishment routine. 

Likewise, one could not have imagined exploring several higher education programs or career paths, to suit their aspirations. Students can now study in colleges, universities and even trade-specific institutes in their home country, or abroad, to gain their desired skills without having to worry about the fee: there are institutions ranging from premier to those charging  nominally. Above all, there are employment opportunities galore in several occupations and one can access as per their qualifications and experience, and join either local or multinational companies.    

In conclusion, undeniably, there is a plentiful variety of every possible commodity and service has enriched human life and proven to be a bliss for even those who could only dream of formerly, making life convenient for all.