Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. However, some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. However, some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.  

A faction of society believes ingenuity is motivated by monetary rewards, others feel the primary aim of it should be the upheaval of society and ecology. This essay shall discuss both viewpoints to elucidate a plausible conclusion.

To begin with, proponents of environment professes that novel technologies should aim to be the cornerstone of tremendous growth of mankind as a whole: it is the advent of these marvels that can afford an easygoing lifestyle, wherein tasks requiring mammoth efforts can be achieved quickly: enhancements in construction technologies can make building skyscrapers effortless, something that nowadays accounts for decades of construction, causing wastage of natural resources and manpower, and insurmountable harm to the environment.

Additionally, incrementing productivity in the workforce should be another goal of inventive endeavors, like machines being equipped to automate recurring tasks, allowing workers dedicating resources and time to intellect-intensive undertakings, to gain dexterity and traits of multitasking, thereby enabling them to dedicate quality-time to their social commitments. Similarly, appropriate efforts should be charted for eco-centric researches for the preservation of the planet and alike conservation of its pristine natural habitats, carbon-neutral manufacturing processes to ensure perpetuation of a hospitable environment for living beings. 

On the other hand, the advocates  of innovation-driven economy eulogize the umpteen venues of socioeconomic growth that have been generated for everyone - profits for businesses, employment for millions and revenues worth billions. This further benefits governments by letting them net colossal revenues and strategically positioning these activities for social transformation. According to a survey conducted in India, technological advancements added thirty hours a week of manpower, on average, in the last decade.

Overall, ground-breaking research equally benefits humanity and ecology, besides creating economic value and monetary surplus, stimulating striking a balance between both the aims to bring the best out of each novel endeavor. 

In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

 In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Digital technology is becoming more advanced in concurrent times, and some anticipate that in the coming days, a majority will shift their reading habits from printed books and newspapers to the virtual platforms. The forthcoming paragraphs shall analyze this notion and share a plausible conclusion.

To start with, some believe that the way people are becoming busier in their daily routines, they are likely to embrace the soft copies instead of stepping out of their comfort zones to procure printed versions already available over the internet, and could be accessed with their single click absolutely free. Consequently, such circumstances will promote online versions of every content, and paper-based material will become a history. 

Additionally, few will be keen to bear the burden of carrying heavy books of different  subjects and tedious oversized newspapers when they can read everything on their compact devices; it has been seen university students are already shifting from conventional to the electronic modes - they dread carrying tonnes of books to serve different purposes.

However, the advocates of traditional means of gaining knowledge and apprising about happening around the world are still hopeful that a  majority will remain passionate about reading the printed versions: they will continue using the conventional means as a quality pastime helping them escape the mundane surroundings created by overwhelming presence of technology in every walk of their life. Similarly, there will still be some certain areas that will be out of bounds for technology and network and one will still have to rely on these older means.

Overall, I completely concur that people will move towards the digital era, there has been a decisive shift in the habits of every individual, especially in terms of reading the content online as compared to the printed materials.

Some people think that the amount of noise one makes should be strictly controlled. Others believe one should be free to make as much noise as one wishes. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 Some people think that the amount of noise one makes should be strictly controlled. Others believe one should be free to make as much noise as one wishes. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In the era of abounding pollution, there is a brewing debate surrounding the menace created by sound and its control: a faction believes tighter noise-related regulation must be deployed, while others advocate liberty. This essay shall delve deeper into both perspectives to elucidate a conclusion.

Myriads of pollution are taking a toll on quality of life, especially high decibel levels: the constant high-pitched ringing of urban settings is predisposing individuals to stressful days and restless nights, precipitating health hazards: headaches, migrain, hypertension. Regimes are cautiously aware about this jeopardy, backing up the suggestion of imposing stern guidelines to mitigating noisy surroundings, especially around certain locations: hospitals, libraries, old-age homes, to name a few.

Moreover, blaring induces a plethora of detriments to overall well being for the ones residing or working in such places: difficulties in concentrating, sleeping, communicating; even causing life-threatening ramifications in extreme cases, making the proposal of sound control laws warranted. A survey on ear inspection of construction employees revealed severe auditory complications, varying from partial hearing loss to total erosion of ear drums.

However, some vouch for a liberal framework, for any stringent act could result in hampering economic activities, bound to generate a blasting boom, such as mining, blasting, construction, music concerts, and consequently, the growth. Additionally, what may sound jarring to one might be recreational to others. For instance, the rock or heavy metal music genre is traditionally characterized by loud distorted guitars, emphatic rhythms, dense bass-and-drum sound and vigorous vocals, which might sound discordant and irritating to others.

Overall, despite a few unavoidable circumstances, noisy scenarios must be controlled and the levels should be limited as, above a certain limit, it can be counterproductive. Everyone should exercise caution or employ sound-proof measures if the intensity is beyond certain levels.

The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recent accidents involving goods carriers have raised concerns for safety of road users and material. To  address this, some prescribe an yearly driving examination of those operating goods vehicles, while others feel this is unnecessary. This essay shall delve deeper into both perspectives to elucidate a conclusion.

Those vouching for annual driving competency checks, often cite evaluating the professional and physical fitness of drivers; such arrangements can identify ailments and analyze dire consequences on their health. Such periodic evaluation can ensure whether the candidate appearing for the test is fit to drive heavy vehicles or not. In a way this arrangement will allow to determine the driving capacity of individuals as per their mental and physical abilities: it will create categories of driving professionals for long and short haul journeys.

Additionally, this can periodically educate commercial drivers about ever evolving transportation technologies and laws, allowing requisite authorities to identify and address deficiencies in driving skills, or knowledge, thereby mitigating the likelihood of accidents caused by driver error. Additionally, this can act as a deterrent against reckless driving behavior and promote a culture of safety and accountability within the transport industry.

However, those skeptical of this suggestion propose that it will only expose drivers to regular stress and financial burden; they will have to take time off from work and dedicate additional resources to clear these tests. This is likely to have a domino effect: the logistics companies will either have to hire extra staff or delay the deliveries, affecting their efficiency adversely and slowing down the trade.

Overall, while regular driver testing may help augment road safety to some extent, it is also likely to cause discomfort to individuals and the industry. Thus, this policy should be discreet in areas that are prone to mishaps.

Most high level jobs are done by men. Should the government encourage a certain % of these jobs to be reserved for women?

Most high level jobs are done by men. Should the government encourage a certain % of these jobs to be reserved for women?

The suggestion regarding earmarking a certain proportion of leadership posts for women invites mixed reactions. The following proposal shall be profoundly analyzed in the following paragraphs. 

Many schools of thought vouch for the notion that females are equally gifted and sometimes prove to be better leaders; they have been excelling in any roles allocated to them in disparate domains - ranging from leading profit centers to prospering businesses, but their candidature is seldom considered due to the orthodox views harbored by those at the top. Embracing this arrangement will help ensure that they get their due. 

Also, women do deserve equal opportunities for top jobs, as they are effective motivators. They act as beacons for their family, children and acquaintances, and have always inspired others to attempt to attain pinnacle. Thus, reserving some places needing one to take ownership, for them will help society harness this talent and derive excellent outcomes in terms of productivity at organizational level. Similarly, this would enhance diversity of talent and also offer solutions from disparate perspectives, both male and female, allowing a better mixture of energy that the former are known for, and the patient observations that latter are bestowed with.  

Nevertheless, there is some skepticism regarding such settings. It is feared that this might precipitate unfair treatment to the better qualified, simply overlooked due to their gender, eventually, leading to resistance and backlash from both the genders who believe in opportunities being offered on the basis of abilities rather than sexes, causing tensions and divisions in the workplace, affecting the work environment unfavorably. 

In conclusion, the scheme of  keeping some percentage of top management slots aside for women cannot be deemed acceptable by most because it will lead to gender-based conflicts, fetching chaos in return.  

Some say that due to heavy traffic governments need to build more roads in metropolitan cities, while others argue this isn’t the right solution and may fail to help. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your reasons and examples.

Some say that due to heavy traffic governments need to build more roads in metropolitan cities, while others argue this isn’t the right solution and may fail to help. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your reasons and examples.

The debate surrounding ways to find easing congestion on urban roads is the most heated. While some suggest that the state should build more roads, claiming it would be a suitable solution, others believe it would exacerbate the problems. The forthcoming paragraphs shall look into the matter thoroughly and share a plausible conclusion.   

To begin with, a lobby professes that construction of new roads and bridges would help in creating a bi-furcation between those traveling within a limited area and those traversing across cities, ultimately decreasing the density of congestion of automobiles on the current roads. This will create a time saving ecosystem as a massive amount of time is wasted in intensive road jams, different routes for different suitable vehicles will make commuting much faster and also keeps a less chaotic environment. 

Similarly,  this move will help create more lanes for a variety of vehicles, rendering smooth flow at speed, resulting in a healthy driving environment. For instance, the advanced lane system in the city of Mumbai has resulted in fast traveling; motorists have reported saving at least 2 hours everyday that they used to exhaust while reaching their offices in mornings and back home in evenings.  

However, some feel this proposal will only waste money as they believe less roads are not the main reason for traffic jams; the rising population is one of greatest factors affecting road traveling. To add to woes, poor public transport networks force urbanites to opt for their conveyance. Thus, any expansion of pathways will be soon clogged with more vehicles.    

Overall, I believe that building new pathways is a great idea and will go a long way in mitigating the problem of traffic, providing ease of traveling to road users. Therefore, I completely agree with the idea.

These days more teenagers and young people are committing crime. What is the cause? How should they be punished for this?

These days more teenagers and young people are committing crime. What is the cause? How should they be punished for this?

Recent times are witnessing an increment in unlawful endeavors, especially by youngsters. There is a brewing discussion about its root, and the respective method to retribution. This essay shall delve deeper into both issues and draw a plausible conclusion.

To embark on this discussion, recent statistics depict a surge in criminal indulgence by juveniles and social behaviorists cite umpteen reasons for this phenomenon: the handiness of drugs, weapons, and easy money is the vicious triad often blamed for young one going ashtray, and they resort to committing crimes once they are bereft of resources; besides this it is desperation and lack of guidance that motivate many to beg, borrow and steal.

Additionally, many propound the proliferation of unemployment among youth as another basis of nefarious acts since jobs are scarce and skyrocketing prices of everything bring no benefit for them being law-abiding citizens. These jobless must fend for themselves, and to fulfill their basic needs, they prefer shortcuts. A study by the New York state Department of Justice revealed that 80 percent of jobless young people are involved in some or the other kinds of deviant ways.

Several criminologists propose a holistic approach that embraces punitive methods to penalize young perpetrators(law breakers) that are also rehabilitative in nature. As per them, young offenders should be provided with opportunities for education, skill development, and counseling during their incarceration to facilitate their reintegration into the mainstream and persuade them to lead a safe life as law-abiding citizens.

In conclusion, the upsurge in anti-social activities involving juveniles can be attributed to a combination of socioeconomic factors, lack of positive influences, and societal pressures. To effectively combat this issue, proactive measures such as early intervention programs and reformative punishment strategies are crucial.

Establishment of superstores has resulted in closure of small shops. Is it a positive or negative development?

 Establishment of superstores has resulted in closure of small shops. Is it a positive or negative development?

Mushrooming megastores, where multiple types of products are available at one roof, are leading putting small outlets out of business.  This phenomenon has been eulogized as a favorable evolution, nonetheless it is hard to overlook its pitfalls.   

Superstores offer unprecedented convenience, in the form of affording relief from running pillar to post to buy necessities and other goods. Consumers can access goods of multiple varieties, brands and prices, saving them humongous time and effort. Similarly, in such stores, discounts and schemes are usually available, especially during the festive season, by virtue of these organizations procuring goods in bulk directly from producers, circumventing middlemen, at much lower cost; consequently, keeping the prices down. Above all, this evolution is also engendering skilled across a cross-section of skills, thereby benefiting the society at large.  

Having said that, those skeptical cite unfavorable tendencies that this switch has produced: people are becoming spendthrift and jeopardizing their financial credentials,  for they tend to fall prey to the aggressive sales promotion by supermarkets, and buy more than required, impacting their budget adversely. Sometimes, they must also buy in advance; they cannot visit these locations often. Moreover, goods cannot be purchased on credit basis, a facility readily available in small-scale stores. These factors cumulatively impact people financially. 

To add to that, the sense of community is slowly waning: small shops rendered a way to interact with the neighbors. When one would go to shop at such places, they would meet their friends and also interact with them, whereas the large format stores tend to alienate visitors: everyone shopping is stranger to each other.  

In hindsight, departmental stores offer colossal benefits; myriads of goods with varying prices and brands are available at a single place, and at affordable costs. Thus, this trend is favorable. 

In some countries, people are allowed to keep arms, while some people feel that private citizens should not be allowed to keep arms and ammunition as it can threaten the society and pose serious problems for public safety. Discuss and give your opinion.

In some countries, people are allowed to keep arms, while some people feel that private citizens should not be allowed to keep arms and ammunition as it can threaten the society and pose serious problems for public safety. Discuss and give your opinion. 

The debate over the right to bear arms is complex and has been vehemently questioned. In contemporary times, people have various perspectives on this matter. In this essay, I shall elucidate my stance on this matter allowing this privilege could prove to be counterproductive, and thus,  must not be afforded to private citizens. 

The proponents of this policy advocate that it is the right of individuals to possess arms and ammunition to safeguard themselves and their family members. Supporters also believe that these devices empower them for self - defense at challenging times:  they can act like a strong deterrent against potential criminal acts and keep the victims safe. Similarly, in countries where safety is a major concern, citizens are advised to be cautious of the situations and hence, feel it essential to own weapons. Nevertheless, these assumptions fall flat when considering the ground reality; this apparatus has resulted in engendering more jeopardies than bringing around a sense of security. Barring a few situations, where license has been given, others need not have ownership of these deadly equipment. 

When one does not have a gun, they are not compelled to use one. Absence of gun control laws contributes to increase in crime rates and also contributes to mass shootings. Having ownership of guns can have detrimental effects as sometimes people lose their sense of calm in pressing situations, and tend to use it without a second thought. Even at the slightest provocation, many make use of it. At times, youngsters also use it due to curiosity, or for addressing their adrenaline rush, menacing their and the safety of others. Moreover, easy access to these hazardous devices promotes violence, increasing crime rate; ultimately, leading to anti-social activities, and fueling social  discord. Many social behaviorists feel that the sheer presence of these makes people feel nervous in their own homes instead of feeling  safe. 

In hindsight, there will be severe ramifications in such a scenario and have negative societal impacts .In order to curb impulsive and potentially dangerous acts, firearms must not be given free access. These only pose a threat to society, but rarely help in extending effective safeguards.  

Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Can enduring associations with others be bolstered by being truthful, is a matter that invites mixed reaction. It remains to be seen up to what extent this notion holds relevance.

To start with, being transparent consistently helps build mutual trust and earn one the reputation of being a reliable personality, and they are never questioned for their actions and utterances. Their words are taken as sermons and people tend to follow such individuals without reluctance. Such conditions can easily be observed in instances where leaders of religious groups, communes and even establishments, are able to persuade their followers and subordinates to follow their orders, suggestions and teachings.

Similarly, this virtue fills one with confidence and sustains their relationships more meaningfully and without any apprehensions. To corroborate, where  both the spouses are honest and true to each other, rarely, if ever, hide the facts their marriages and bonds, are likely to survive the test of time, whereas lies can hamper the image of harmony and bonhomie, resulting in legal separation.  

However, some are skeptical of the former opinion and assert that even though uttering the truth, surely, is an invaluable trait  for everlasting ties, it is hard to practice it in every circumstance, especially when dealing with children. Parents have to edit the facts, concoct stories and narrate them to their wards, in order to prevent them from going astray, or teach them critical life lessons, like value of money, education and relevance of keeping good company, to help polish their personalities.

In hindsight, despite truthfulness being a crucial attribute for any relationships, it cannot be deployed in every condition. One has to be prudent/judicious/rational to use the right mixture of both the virtues to attain objectives without harming others.

Physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools. Do you agree or disagree?

Physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools. Do you agree or disagree?

Most countries across the globe are witnessing a decline in physical fitness in school aged children, which evokes a proposal that participation in sports and physical education should be mandatory at school. I completely concur/accede/I am in favor of /inclined with this practice, and in this essay will put forth my views.

To embark on the discussion, the support for this suggestion finds its support in the benefits fetched by physical endeavors: sports acts as a medium for the learners to destress themselves by earning a healthy escape, from mundane, and a distraction from an overwhelming academic regime, enabling them to metabolize their stress harmlessly. Moreover, skills like team spirit, tackling failure and success, and so on,  which act as the cornerstone for a successful adult life, are inculcated right from childhood. Similarly, this can bolster necessary mental and motor skills: hand-eye coordination, fine motor movements and concentration, to name a few. 

On top of that, in current times, surfeit indulgence in computers and technology is depriving youngsters of opportunities to engage in physical activities, thereby exposing them to obesity and related diseases, all this can be prevented when engaged in exertional sports activities. Additionally, it is often noticed some students have more inclination towards physical activity, they tend to perform well in them, and can take it up as a profession in future. Besides this, formal tuitions are responsible for overall development as well as physical and mental well being, so this undertaking should be integrated in school.

To sum up, schooling  should, besides delivering academic knowhow, should also mandatorily integrate physical education in the formal curriculum. Active participation will make children fit and help them learn important life skills, ensuring a safe and healthy future generation.

Multicultural society brings more benefits to the country than drawbacks. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Multicultural society brings more benefits to the country than drawbacks. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

A faction of society believes that diverse cultures are the cornerstone of a vibrant nation engendering multifaceted upsides, while some cite umpteen pitfalls of this. This essay shall delve deeper into both viewpoints and draw a plausible conclusion.

To begin with, cultural diversity fosters enrichment and understanding within a nation. When individuals from varied cultural backgrounds interact, and share their traditions, languages, and customs, it cultivates a climate of tolerance and respect, facilitating dialogue and appreciation, thereby contributing to the development of a harmonious and inclusive society. Furthermore, it strengthens social cohesion and national unity. By celebrating diversity and promoting equal opportunities for all citizens, societies can mitigate social tensions and foster a sense of belongingness to reinforce values and principles of cohabitation.

Moreover, cross-cultural practices serve as a catalyst for innovation and economic prosperity. The populace comprising diverse ethnicities contribute with their diverse perspectives, skills, and talents, which inject dynamism into the workforce and drive entrepreneurship. By fostering this variety and inclusion, societies are better equipped to adapt to rapid changes in the global economy - enhancing competitiveness and productivity.

While detractors of multiculturalism may argue that it can lead to social fragmentation or conflicts, empirical evidence suggests otherwise: studies have consistently shown that countries with diverse populations tend to exhibit higher levels of innovation, economic growth, and social cohesion.

In conclusion, the advantages of a multicultural society, including cultural enrichment, economic prosperity, and social cohesion, far outweigh any potential drawbacks. By embracing diversity and promoting bonhomie, nations can harness the full potential of multiculturalism to build stronger, more vibrant communities in an interconnected world.

Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

In contemporary times, the income of celebrated personalities is exceeding that of political leaders. This can be attributed to several causes, while some consider this a favorable trend, others consider this detrimental for society. This essay shall delve deeper into various facets and draw a plausible conclusion.

At the outset, there are a plethora of reasons for this earning inequality, one of the major sources of being endorsements, which fuel mammoth net worth of famous personalities, creating numerous streams of income, and affording them to amass mammoth resources in no time. Additionally, their fans are willing to shell out unimaginable fees on concerts and shows which allows them to charge an exorbitant price tag. It is this personal influence which often fetches them equity and investments from well-known brands and products, only for associating their name with such companies.

However, social pundits consider this vogue counterproductive for society, especially for youngsters; they blindly follow the personas and opinions of these celebrated figures, rarely evaluating pitfalls of this. This cult following may agitate public servants, due to which many of them, for amassing riches and fame that it fetches, might resort to corrupt practices. Similarly, such disparity could potentially contribute to a sense of inequality and disillusionment with the political system and might discourage juveniles from pursuing careers into public services, pushing them to chase a mirage of glamor, which only a few will be able to achieve.

Overall, while the gap of wealth between government representatives and media influencers reflects the meritocracy of the entertainment industry and inspires individuals to pursue their passions, it also raises questions about societal values and the role of public service. This might stir ethical and moral issues to some extent and cause unfavorable societal implications.

Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

 Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

In contemporary times, the pervasive trend of investing into the merchandise of reputed brands has seen a significant rise. In this essay, I shall delve into the key reasons behind this propensity and explain why it is a detrimental evolution.  

The primary driver of this inclination is the perceived high quality and durability: renowned brands often produce goods with excellent finish that exhibit craftsmanship. Furthermore, possession of such products is generally deemed as a symbol of affluence that simultaneously fetches social validation. Similarly, there is a drastic increase in disposable incomes, leading to increment in  spending capacity and aiding people in choosing from a plethora of high priced options available to them. Moreover, the media plays an integral role in engendering cravings for luxurious lifestyles. 

The only positive attribute this phenomenon has is that it offers a life of exclusivity when one is driving a luxurious car;  carrying an exclusive handbag; or wearing a branded attire; however, it is fraught (shrouded) with severe ramifications  as the havoc it is wreaking in the lives is irrecoverable. The constant exposure of these merchandise by celebrities entices the youth to go on a buying spree and become spendthrift. 

Additionally, there is a wasteful expenditure of resources causing an excessive financial crisis as the majority have started taking loans in order to  fulfill their desires - the emphasis on brand image and materialism taking precedence. Instead of creating an image, it dampens the self esteem of users trying to ape those who populate the high end of income spectrum leaving them distraught. 

Thus, it is crucial that the allure of famous brands in modern consumer culture must be seen with a critical eye;the benefits earned are short-termed but the accompanying circumstances cause people to endure hardships and crises. 

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a prevalent belief that unlawful acts of violent nature stem from brutality showcased in motion films and television programs; thus, to help impede such phenomenon the content in these media should be strictly regulated. This essay shall examine the relevance of this statement in the following paragraphs, and emanate a substantiated conclusion. 

At the outset, the support for this proposal is founded on the assumption( presupposition/postulation/presumption/hypothesis) that cruelty is highly glamorised and tends to impact viewers, especially the young, as it gives a food for thought and persuades individuals to emulate such criminal endeavors. This lobby is often seen citing sporadic cases that followed famous Netflix series like Money Heist. This program was blamed for an increment in incidents  all across the world mimicking similar ideas of savagery, heightening criminal activities. Nevertheless, the producers overtly claimed that the inspiration for this soap opera was drawn from real incidents that took place in various cities of the USA.

However, the opponents of this notion fail to concur as they feel that the audience must not be deprived of a particular genre. They assert that the audience, regardless of their age in contemporary times, have a mind of their own, and will not accept something that does not appeal to them. They rarely blur the boundaries between the reel and real life. Movies and tele-series prove to be a mere source of entertainment and do not coax anyone to resort to illegal acts showcasing blood and gore. 

Therefore, the suggestion that the cinematic industry promulgates violence and should be barred from presenting such content can be vehemently questioned and debunked; the audience is smart enough to differentiate between what is happening on screen and the impact of such undertakings in real life.

Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools and others feel they benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools and others feel they benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Education plays a very important role in life, schooling thereof being of more critical importance. Some believe letting both genders attend separate schools fetch more benefits while others contradict the view. Both have apt justifications for their opinions.

The lobby advocating mixed schooling says that, in tune with the contemporary era where gender equality is much talked about, attending same schools is of great advantage as imparting same set of instructions and teaching and making them face same challenges not only prepares both genders for professional life where both walk at the same pace but also enables a better understanding as they would not consider the other inferior or superior.

Moreover, letting both sexes enjoy learning in the same facility is beneficial to the economy on the whole as setting up an entirely new establishment involves huge costs in terms of salaries, maintenance etc, which when saved can be utilized for other needs of society. For instance, money saved on setting up new entities can be wisely used to provide other social causes like hospitals, better roads etc.

Nevertheless, those vouching for separate schools opine that educating both in gender specific formal tuition enables better learning as the students can focus more on studies as there are less possibilities of distractions due to absence to other sex. Also, some claim that there have been instances where girls find it problematic to put queries in the class due to the presence of boys as the latter are rowdy by nature and cause problems.

In hindsight, the benefits of separate schooling, although should be given due consideration, are outweighed by the advantages the mixed schooling can render. Thus, in my opinion, the students undoubtedly gain more when they are made to receive education under the same roof.

In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?

In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message? 

Across the globe, young ones are advised that there is nothing that is an uphill task, every challenge is attainable ,by virtue of their endeavors. Many feel that passing such information has many benefits, while others refute this notion asserting that it has drawbacks too/ this is laden with drawbacks .

This positive entrenchment lays a plinth which brings out ample of enriching qualities in an individual. This aids fostering the traits like perseverance, an unswerving determination which encourages them to attempt overcoming any kind of adversity or to face any gauntlet. Further, this allows them to be more creative and sharpen their innate skills, analysing and constructing the suitable strategies. Such a young populace develops confidence and has enthusiasm to pursue their goals. Besides this, it assists the community greatly as the young generation is adequately prepared to encounter hardships with their efforts rather than being dependent on their destiny .

Having said that, there is a critical assessment of such education, it can pose many impediments as there is a fine line between firm resolve and madness/eccentricity and this may turn many stubborn, reluctant and unprepared to listen. Moreover, some act as if they are possessed and keep on moving on a path mindlessly, without even appreciating their aptitude. Such a scenario may lead to stress and many other mental afflictions as youngsters may pursue such aims that are beyond their resources, resulting in only unprecedented sufferings.

In hindsight , it is true that toil paves the way to a successful life and juveniles should be trained to slog for goals; however, it is of paramount importance that the viability of aims should be considered before acting robotically and to avoid wild goose chase.

In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

 In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

Even though this arrangement carries umpteen benefits, it is hard to overlook its pitfalls; however, it does evoke a controversy whether the former eclipse its failings.  

In modern times, it is often observed that learners have to move out of their homes for higher studies, and it is the most pivotal decision of their life. I opine this arrangement brings numerous benefits that easily exceed its drawbacks.

To begin with, when one moves out of the home to embark upon an academic journey, it is overwhelming initially in terms of: financial burden, living alone, facing lack of support, finding it onerous to manage the time, and suffering psychological impact, and so on. This can lead to home sickness, taking an emotional toll on the well being of the young ones, precipitating distraction from studies, causing frequent absenteeism from classes. Likewise, often to cope with this stress, many become prone to going astray, and picking up unacceptable habits: drinking and drug abuse, to name a few.  

However, despite having certain shortfalls,  shifting to another location offers umpteen incomparable benefits: those surviving independently foster a sense of autonomy, learn to carry out daily activities, without external intervention, while managing studies. Similarly, the new area and peers - hailing from varied cultures and places - helps enhance their understanding and appreciation of diversity. These skills are essential for the progress on the personal and professional front as these independent interactions add to overall development. Another farfetched positive aspect of this setting is a heightening of confidence, problem solving skills, as one is subjected to a roller-coaster ride on various occasions. These experiences are vital for holistic development as an independent personality.

Overall, although living away from family for education is fraught with complications: financial and emotional, these cannot surpass the favorable factors  that buttress personal growth and broadens horizons, typical integral features of university life.

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses.

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why is this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?

Today, youth from prosperous parts of the world are motivated to volunteer in poverty-stricken regions due to various reasons. Such an evolution is proving to be a win-win situation for all the parties involved. 

The primary cause that is stimulating the young generation of elite countries to rise to the occasion and served the impoverished is the advent of globalization, by virtue of which youngsters feel that  it is their moral responsibility to lend a hand to help mitigate miseries of the deprived so that the latter can also lead a comfortable life. Moreover, their adventurous spirit and an intent to do something new is acting as a driving force, making them transcend geographical, political and socio-economic barriers. 

Undertaking such endeavors is turning out to be extensively favourable for youngsters: they are able to learn about the problems faced by those surviving in poor economic conditions and the ways to alleviate those afflictions; and forge relationships  with people from other parts of the world, strengthening a feeling of homogeneity and empathy towards others. 

Similarly,  societies, both recipient and donors are able derive sumptuous advantages. Where the former can use the expertise, otherwise absent due to lack of education in such societies, to deploy in various strategic sectors and create venues for development, the latter affords an opportunity to enrich its skill pool with the talent that is capable of performing even in daunting conditions, absence of resources and presence of numerous impediments such as social, cultural and legal.

Overall,  this phenomenon is driven globalization and a sense of adventure, but the benefits it is fetching are innumerable; where youngsters gain in-depth knowledge about the problems faced by the third world, the global society is rendered with the workforce that can operate under any conditions.

In hindsight, this newly emerging phenomenon has, although taken everyone by surprise, it is nonetheless deemed as reassuring that renders guarantee for closer cooperation between different countries. Similarly, the young and societies on both sides receive humongous rewards. 

Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable. Discuss.

Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable. Discuss.

There is a prevalent belief that the ideal environment for rearing children is the urban surroundings, while several others have the perception that villages may prove to be beneficial. This notion evokes mixed responses and needs to be critically analyzed before arriving at a plausible conclusion.

A significant faction believes that urban locales help broaden the horizons of young individuals while they are growing up as they afford access to quality education: good schools, libraries, universities  and other resources. Furthermore, as they grow up, they receive surfeit opportunities for employment -  these locations are abounding with myriads of industries and happen to be the economic powerhouse - fetching enhanced quality of life. Moreover, urban areas have people from diverse cultural backgrounds that aids in fostering experiences of  several individuals leading to broader perspectives and a better worldview.  Also, young urbanites enjoy the advantage of exploring a wide array of leisure activities such as sports complexes, music academies and so on, assisting them in cultivating hobbies and discovering their creative persona.

  

However, as per the other school of thought when youngsters spend their childhood in a rural environment, they learn to embrace nature and its bounties. This can prove to render health benefits and instill a sense of tranquility in them. Besides this, young ruralites residing have a strong sense of community hardwired into them owing to lack of population and a close and regular contact between the neighbours and other inhabitants, teaching them about helping each other and cohabiting harmoniously.

   

Therefore, both the opinions hinge on plausible justifications, and I believe that both the environments have distinct pros to offer. Thus, it is  the individual prerogative where one wants to bring their progeny up.   

In many countries today, crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular. Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular? What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas?

In many countries today, crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular. Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular? What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas?

Crime-based fiction and non-fiction narratives, in printed versions and audio-visual presentations, have been gaining favors from more and more. This can be attributed to several causes, and has variable effects on the audience. 

To commence with, the primary driver of this craving is the innate animal instincts that persuade one to access the content that portrays violence, anti-social acts and sufferings of victims, thereby letting some experience happiness in perversion and others express sympathy at the plight of sufferers. Similarly, the suspense created by this kind of literature, soap operas and documentaries, tend to make readers and viewers curious, making them go for more. Moreover, many find novels and television series of this type quite fascinating as the plots challenge their investigative skills and bring detectives out of them. 

This phenomenon allows the followers of this style of stories and audio-visual showcasing to familiarize with the misery of the affected and ruthlessness of perpetrators without actually breaking the law themselves. Likewise, a majority reports that they are able to enlighten themselves about the threats and dangers lurking around them, and embrace appropriate precautions as safeguards against incidence of unlawful and illegal endeavors. 

However, there is a darker side to this propensity: a general fear is expressed about drawing inspiration from such portrayals in books and on television, and emulating them in real life; especially youngsters are the most vulnerable group who are likely to reenact what they read and see, and their surroundings even though these utterances have little factual evidence in support.  

Overall, the spirit of inquiry, the inherited biological traits, and profound desire to inform oneself about the jeopardies that could adversely affect the safety, have helped sustain the popularity of this genre; and in a way, this has positively impacted society.  

In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

 In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

Even though this arrangement carries umpteen benefits, it is hard to overlook its pitfalls; however, it does evoke a controversy whether the former eclipse its failings.  

In modern times, it is often observed that learners have to move out of their homes for higher studies, and it is the most pivotal decision of their life. I opine this arrangement brings numerous benefits that easily exceed its drawbacks.

To begin with, when one moves out of the home to embark upon an academic journey, it is overwhelming initially in terms of: financial burden, living alone, facing lack of support, finding it onerous to manage the time, and suffering psychological impact, and so on. This can lead to home sickness, taking an emotional toll on the well being of the young ones, precipitating distraction from studies, causing frequent absenteeism from classes. Likewise, often to cope with this stress, many become prone to going astray, and picking up unacceptable habits: drinking and drug abuse, to name a few.  

However, despite having certain shortfalls,  shifting to another location offers umpteen incomparable benefits: those surviving independently foster a sense of autonomy, learn to carry out daily activities, without external intervention, while managing studies. Similarly, the new area and peers - hailing from varied cultures and places - helps enhance their understanding and appreciation of diversity. These skills are essential for the progress on the personal and professional front as these independent interactions add to overall development. Another farfetched positive aspect of this setting is a heightening of confidence, problem solving skills, as one is subjected to a roller-coaster ride on various occasions. These experiences are vital for holistic development as an independent personality.

Overall, although living away from family for education is fraught with complications: financial and emotional, these cannot surpass the favorable factors  that buttress personal growth and broadens horizons, typical integral features of university life.

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Modern times are witnessing poor lifestyle choices rising, persuading a debate that measures should be embraced to ensure well being, but who should take the onus of this. While some suggest that one should take the ownership in this case, others feel that the state should handle this.  

 

Those in favor of governments donning the mantle for safeguarding public health  feel that it is its duty since it has resources and expertise to deal with a task of such monumental dimensions. Individuals are bereft of knowledge of how to negotiate the challenge of sustaining their well being owing to their overwhelming professional engagements, and have little time to seek mediums to enlighten themselves, by the politicians have all the mediums and motives to do so, such as    imposing heavy taxes on unhealthy food products consumers; offering subsidies on nutritional food; enforcing food labeling on products; and by enlightening about healthy options, to name a few. 

Nevertheless, proponents of the individuals looking after their wellness propound that motivation to live a healthy life pattern should be personal, so that they can decide upon themselves which path they want to follow, as it is a matter of autonomy. Adding to this, everyone is aware of the choices they make and it is all dependent on their preferences and circumstances, and they are equipped with the knowledge of what health consequences it will lead to in future. Numerous studies revealed that, if there one can never be forced to follow a regime unless they  are convinced: it will fetch little yield.

Overall, self affirmation is the essential criteria for leading  a healthy lifestyle. The state can only support certain acts like campaigns and create public awareness, nonetheless the onus rests on people to follow, or not to follow. 

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions.

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates.

What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions. 

Human activities have caused disarray in the equilibrium of nature, giving rise to major issues; warmer atmosphere, melting of ice glaciers and thus leading to a major rise in sea levels. It has become imperative to find ways to salvage the situation.

Global rise in temperatures is a major concern for coastal populations as the rising seawater level, due to the melting of ice, has made floods more rampant, causing risk to life and property. This also is making many cities and nations, like New York, Los Angeles and SIngapore to name a few, located on coasts, vulnerable to incidence of submerging underwater. Thus, inviting major economic crisis and chaos: many would be rendered homeless and jobless, thereby, making subsistence difficult for humans. 

Moreover this phenomenon can result in extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes, tornadoes and heatwaves.  This may lead to major temperature changes in the environment as more rains and drought are likely to occur, which is a big threat for the flora and fauna, raising  the risk of spreading new diseases around the globe. These imbalances would result in major threats to drinking water, food supplies and human lives.

These issues can be addressed by nations and all governing bodies by reducing the dependency on fossil fuels and finding alternate sources to derive energy. With that major incentives should be given to industries on reducing  carbon footprints. Most importantly, halting deforestation should be allocated a major priority as this would prevent buildup of greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide that is released after logging activity.

Hence, it is evident that humans have brought misery onto themselves in the form of this perilous situation. Thus, it is imperative that it is humans who can take remedial actions to prevent an imminent catastrophe. 

Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Should modern methods of investigating criminal events be deployed to scrutinize past events, or not, is a matter of profound debate, and it is felt that there is a need to critically analyze this  statement. 

Those proposing this arrangement feel that incorporating modern investigative tools to delve into past cases of criminal intent could help unravel the mysteries associated with those incidents, leading to identification of the real culprits, and also uncover the circumstances under which such events occurred, clearing the air of doubt about the perpetrators. To corroborate, the-state-of-the-art methods of examining old unlawful acts have revealed that Abraham Lincoln did not die of a bullet wound, but due to the subsequent surgical procedure committed mistakenly on him.  

Similarly, this could aid in resolving the unsolved cold cases  where the lawbreakers have been at large. Since the up-to-date tools of criminal analysis use various tools: ballistics and DNA investigation, investigators may be able to reach the offenders accurately and apprehend them. This could come in as a respite for those wrongly accused for a criminal act, due to absence of concrete evidence.  

Nevertheless, those cynical of such a proposal feel that despite enthusiasm among supporters of this suggestion, such an examination might not yield desired outcomes since with times, the surroundings where a crime was committed  may have changed and those involved in such endeavors might have perished. Even if some tangible outcomes are achieved, the outcomes, convictions, and time lost cannot be returned.  

Overall, even though the critics do have a valid view, examining past criminal events with the help of newly discovered investigative mechanism can help unearth numerous mysteries associated with those crimes, and also help amass a knowledge resource. Thus, I completely subscribe to this notion.