Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Many prefer to conduct their lives and themselves consistently without deviations, while some seek alterations in their routines believing it fetches fruitful outcomes. This essay critically analyses both the views and serves justified conclusions. 

Undeniably, it is commonly seen that those who find their interest, or desired profession, at a very young age, circumvent switching. To corroborate, if an individual finds a well paid job with chances of growth, they plan on holding onto the same occupation, remain there for years. Moreover, they find themselves in a comfort zone and wish not to step out, fearing  losing everything, once they deviate from the course. This propensity is generally observed among the aging  individuals who dread venturing out in new directions: they feel it might expose them to failure. 

However, those keen to experience a new environment, prefer embracing different approaches, to create room for freshness: continuing in the same regimen for long is quite monotonous that can hamper their creativity. For instance, several musicians try fusing different genres of music in order to discover new sounds, and admit that this satisfies their craving for discovering new ways to produce music.  

Likewise, some, especially the  young and those freshly graduating university, explore new directions to enable enhancements in their professional domains. For instance, many venture into different streams: administration, skilled-jobs, driving, and so forth - until they gain competence - and switch  jobs to find better roles,  bringing rich yields, in the form of better professional, financial and social profiles.  

In hindsight, undeniably, everyone enjoys jurisdiction over the decision to lead the life their way. While some are conservative, others act dynamically and seek new horizons to enrich their lives, and afford themselves innovative ways to better their circumstances and surroundings, and I align myself with this view.  

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions?

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions?

Dramatically-incrementing temperatures pose a significant threat to humanity, especially in the current century, as it contributes to rising sea levels, extreme weather patterns and ecological imbalance. This has precipitated major concerns for coastal communities and nations around the world. I would like to discuss problems associated with this phenomenon and propose remedies. 

One of the most concerning complications of this phenomenon: the rising sea levels presented is the displacement of millions of habitats in low lying coastal areas. These  regions are increasingly at risk of flooding, leading to loss of homes, infrastructure and livelihoods. Countries like Bangladesh and islands, such as Maldives, are particularly vulnerable to this threat. In the long run, this could lead to mass migrations, creating a humanitarian crisis as people will seek refuge in safer areas. In addition,this has also precipitated distortion in weather patterns such as typhoons and storm surges. These events can cause widespread damage to cities and agricultural lands, threatening food security and economic stability in many regions. 

However, there are several potential antidotes to these menacing circumstances: alleviating greenhouse gas emissions, the primary driver of global warming, holds the key. Renewable  energy sources such as solar wind, and hydropower, should be prioritized and quickly supersede fossil fuels. Moreover, investing in more reliant infrastructure to withstand flooding tides can help. Coastal cities can build seawalls, levees and other protective structures to prevent flooding. Additionally, sustainable urban planning strategies should be adopted such as, restricting construction in flood prone areas, and implementing green infrastructure like parks and wetlands to absorb excess water.

In conclusion, the increasing influence of greenhouse effects presents serious challenges, from displacing populations to impacting economies. Thus, a combination of steps like emission reduction and sustainable development should be embraced to mitigate these impacts. 

Some believe that tackling environmental issues should be managed by a global organization instead of being handled individually by national governments. Do you agree or disagree with this belief?

Some believe that tackling environmental issues should be managed by a global organization instead of being handled individually by national governments.

Do you agree or disagree with this belief?

Why a universal approach?

• Environmental problems transcend political and geographical borders, and must be responded jointly 

• There is uneven distribution of resources, which could create an imbalance in implementation, but an international body can effectively bridge this void 

• A global approach can help resolve differences between different nations and engender cooperation 

Why locally? 

• National governments are better informed about the complications affecting local populations

• Decision making fast 

• There is a lack of trust between the the prosperous and destitute nations, the latter fear that the former may try to impede their development in the name of development     

The fast deteriorating health of the planet has drawn a profound interest in finding ways to alleviate this threat, and a majority believes that a task of such multitude requires international action. I subscribe to this notion because such a critical job cannot be negotiated effectively at the regional level.

Undeniably,  pollution transcends geographical and political boundaries and has a domino effect on other areas miles away, sometimes continents apart, from the source. This is likely to impact all forms of life far and wide, and jeopardize people, flora, and fauna. To corroborate, the arctic is getting contaminated by the residue of industrial effluents released from thousands of miles away in Egypt, India, and China, among others, killing the plankton, a food source of myriads species of fish. Such complications must be handled jointly by all countries if any tangible outcomes are to be achieved.

Similarly, individual undertakings aimed at resolving the environmental imbroglio will certainly  be hampered by uneven distribution of resources and expertise while elite societies have these at their disposal, the impoverished lack these. However, global cooperation can help make available essential elements and ingredients to enable discovery and deployment of mitigation tools and strategies. 

Nevertheless, although the skeptic lobby does raise its concerns regarding the developed nations overwhelming their underdeveloped counterparts to push their agenda of gaining control over the latter, these fears are unfounded and lack substance; the consequences of inhospitable environment will affect everyone in equal measure, and will be more pronounced in destitute countries owing to absence of mechanism to offset the environmental impact.

In hindsight, taking steps to avert ecological catastrophe should be the onus of a multilateral world body as only it can engender policies to enable concerted efforts from every part of the globe.

     

Due to so many young people dropping out from school, the rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?"

Due to so many young people dropping out from school, the rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?"

How can this situation be improved?"

• Initiating training in professional and vocational trades that allow young individuals to gain expertise in occupations 
• Revamping the existing educational framework that focuses on inclinations of students rather than gagging them with subjects that disenchant them 
• Integrating technology and modern methods in the classroom
• Giving them inducements  

With school dropouts becoming ubiquitous, youngsters are becoming susceptible to myriad complications:joblessness, which can have social implications.  This makes it imperative to discover solutions resonating well with them, and bringing them to education.    

The  upcoming generation can be stimulated to join back the school by incorporating subjects that disseminate acumen in trades that appeal to them, into the formal curriculum. This will help render them clarity about the objectives they seek to attain through education, and persuade them to finish their studies. In addition, the topics learners find useless, or unnecessarily overwhelming, should be shelved. For instance, the US educational authorities initiated the system of streaming as per the inclination of learners in 2015, and witnessed a phenomenal increment in high school enrollments, across the country.

Similarly, extending financial support, in the form of scholarships, or fee waivers, can be instrumental in motivating young learners, especially ones hailing from poor socioeconomic backgrounds, to rejoin schools. Financial hardships and poverty often compel families to pull out their children from the formal tuition, but such inducements can help coax them to educate their wards. To corroborate, this strategy has been successfully implemented in developing countries world over. 

Moreover, integrating technology in the classroom can spur an interest in the contemporary generation that is majorly surrounded by technology, in all spheres of their lives, to engage with their academic pursuits dedicatedly instead of abandoning them. To illustrate, most Canadian school dropouts admit that they dread using conventional methods, like books to study, which instigates them to relinquish schooling altogether.   

In hindsight, rationalising study plans, extending monetary stimulus to the deprived families, and introducing state-of-the-art tools to impart content, can afford panacea to aid in providing school education its deserving place, and protect future generations from severe ramifications.

Nowadays many young people are drawn towards dangerous sports. What makes them so attractive? What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimise the risks?

Nowadays many young people are drawn towards dangerous sports. What makes them so attractive? What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimise the risks?

Youngsters are becoming more inclined about enrolling themselves into hazardous sports. This propensity can be attributed to several causes, making it imperative to embrace steps to mitigate dangers associated with such endeavors. I shall elucidate both these aspects in the following paragraphs.

To start with, the most prominent factor driving the propensity is the media. The youth get exposed to entertainment channels and favorite TV actors who explore and perform adventure sports and either make videos or documentaries. These activities make the young audience curious to participate themselves into these endeavors and emulate their idols, and a majority admit following this pattern. For example, a renowned politician recently performed a dangerous sport called scuba diving at Lakshadweep in India, by virtue of this many young individuals got influenced and participated in this game.

Moreover, some do not need any kind of influence to explore these kinds of sports since they are born to experiment with such pursuits to escape from the daily mundane, and obtain unique and thrilling experiences. To corroborate, several participants in white water rafting competitions held in Rishikesh, credit such partaking to their intent to do something unprecedented.

Curtailing hazards associated with these pursuits is possible by adoption of myriad measures. People should adopt certain safety steps as safeguards: gaining certification from formal training, wherein they get a chance to experiment and perform under experts and professionals. Likewise, there should be someone to rescue if there is any kind of emergency: this will help turn these pursuits into safer engagements.

To conclude, there are various media outlets which influence young minds into participating in such hazardous sports, along with self motivation to experience new sports, but the associated hazards can be mitigated by embracing safety measures like formal training and protective gear.

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Discuss and give your opinion

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Discuss and  give your opinion 

Today, a growing number of highly qualified professionals from developing countries have been migrating to wealthier nations. While some argue that this trend amounts to exploiting destitute societies, others believe it reflects the natural movement of labour in a globalised world. In my opinion, although developed nations actively attract skilled workers, this migration is ultimately a normal and unavoidable global phenomenon.

Those who view this issue as exploitation allege that wealthy countries deliberately design policies to attract talent from abroad. They offer competitive salaries, comprehensive healthcare benefits, and improved living conditions to skilled professionals. Corporations and governments often create immigration pathways specifically targeting doctors, engineers, and IT specialists. Apart from that, prospective immigrants are also allowed to bring their families along and allow them access permanent residence, and then citizenship through the naturalization process, an offer too tempting to be overlooked. As a result, individuals from impoverished regions are drawn by financial security, career advancement and a stable family life.  

On the other hand, many debunk the former view and believe this movement is a natural consequence of economic disparity and global interconnectedness. Everyone enjoys the fundamental right to seek better opportunities and improve their standard of living, and extend themselves and their kin better facilities and future prospects. Ever since humans appeared on this planet, they have migrated and relocated to places which boast of affording surfeit opportunities for better living conditions, and this ritual has continued into the modern times, and thus, there is nothing alarming about this pattern.    

In conclusion, although it may seem that affluent nations actively encourage skilled migration through attractive incentives and rob their destitute counterparts of their invaluable talent, this process profoundly reflects individual choice and global economic reality and is inevitable. 

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 

Amplifying environmental consciousness has prompted a suggestion about tackling rising traffic congestion and pollution through costly fuel. I completely disagree with this proposal and shall discuss the other plausible steps that can aid surmounting these issues.

To start with, it is wrongly assumed that by making propellants dearer would  dissuade a majority from purchasing petrol-driven vehicles; it would pose an unbearable economic burden, especially on the lower and middle income groups. Consequently, decreasing the number of cars on the road, easing traffic density, and eventually, mitigating emissions. 

However, those cynical of this suggestion assert that such initiatives lack substance and viability. There are areas sans public transport, due lack of proper roads, forcing people to use personal vehicles for commutes everyday, and thus, expensive fuel will only add to their woes, raising their expenditure. Moreover, the elite  - the majority users of personal four wheelers - will remain unaffected with higher prices, and will continue to buy fossil fuel driven vehicles, and a negligible minority of lower and middle income groups will face the wrath instead.  

There are a few practical measures that can be considered to surmount this pressing challenge. Investments  in better infrastructure: roads, which could connect most parts of urban locales effectively, can create motivation to forgo their own and switch to mass transit. Additionally, campaigns could be launched at various levels to engender enlightenment about the ramifications of pollution, and encourage resorting to public commutes and carpooling.  

To conclude, one cannot be lop-sided and push through impractical approaches. Many locations lack connectivity due to absence of roads, and such a proposal will not influence the affluent. The solution lies in investing into building roads, launching campaigns,  and stimulating participation from the society can aid in overcoming this challenge. 

These days, the issue of international marketing has grown its importance, especially in the world of manufacturing facilities and even education overseas or across the globe. While others believe that this would mean invasion and intrusion into the country’s traditional ways.

These days, the issue of international marketing has grown its importance, especially in the world of manufacturing facilities and even education overseas or across the globe. While others believe that this would mean invasion and intrusion into the country’s traditional ways.

In the contemporary globalised world, marketing initiatives have transcended political and geographical boundaries. While some consider this development to be quite favorable, others fear that this might cause dilution of native ways of life. I feel the concerns expressed are lacking in substance; this trend is creating opportunities for many. 

Those skeptical of this trend allege that it is going to interfere with local lifestyles, causing a clash between the age-old customs followed by a society and modern aspirations that are more global in nature, and persuading people, especially the youth, to abandon their beliefs. As per them, such activities tend to promote practices, attitudes, festivals and way of celebrations, among others, of cultures from where  such establishments hail. For example, many working or studying in such institutions complain about their festivals and holidays being ignored, and being persuaded to celebrate  international events.  

However, the former view is not well-founded because whenever any institution markets itself, it always assimilates with local populace to enhance their appeal and create a niche for themselves. Moreover, these endeavors are bolstering trade and employment because when an enterprise expands its outreach in the world, it creates more business and jobs for both: the hosts and the home country. Similarly, this is helping disseminate globally-accepted skills to students across the world, helping create a parity among inhabitants of various countries, which translates into greater opportunities for well-compensated jobs. Many credit their professional achievements to this system: it has exposed them to globally-acknowledged academic resources.  

In hindsight, although complications such as cultures being impacted detrimentally by being side-lined, have been observed, international marketing has been overwhelmingly favorable by virtue of engendering economic opportunities for entrepreneurs and professionals, and aspiring students, but Striking a balance between both could help harness benefits.   

Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

A great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with a view that medicine manufacturers should not advertise their products via mass media, while others disagree and believe that such information is vital for enlightening the public. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.

To start with,  a lobby strongly believes that this strategy encourages self-assessment, which could be erroneous. This is to say, people might wrongly assume that they have a certain illness since the symptoms shown on the television matches their own, precipitating perilous situations, where the ailing consumes drugs without proper professional investigation, resulting in doing more harm than good. 

Moreover, such companies prioritize commercialization over health, endangering human lives by exaggerating benefits or hiding side-effects. For example, a recent survey revealed that many pharma businesses promote their drugs by over stating the merits of their product and obfuscating its adverse reactions, causing the symptoms of disease to amplify rather than alleviate.

Having said that, a group hypothesizes that drug advertisements could disseminate knowledge widely, engendering awareness about the up-to-date medications, treatments and diseases. To corroborate, in Japan, regular adverts on radio help citizens stay updated regarding the ailments and related medical interventions available at the nearby hospitals. Additionally, many can be benefited by early detection of underlying medical conditions and pay a visit to a doctor for proper check-ups. Furthermore, ads on mental illness and its remedies can encourage the afflicted to open up about their conditions and seek help by eliminating the stigma related to it.

In conclusion, disputes aside, I believe that such broadcasting information about medical formulations can be beneficial to some extent, but only if effectively  controlled and regulated  to ensure accuracy, and prevent manipulation.

Universal health insurance is bad because healthy people should not have to pay money to help sick people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Universal health insurance is bad because healthy people should not have to pay money to help sick people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A general perception is emerging that social health insurance is not reasonable and people with excellent health should not pay for sick counterparts. I completely disagree with this statement and shall discuss in the following paragraphs.

To start with, a lobby hypothesizes that one should not bear the  brunt of extending treatment for the ailing since the responsibility lies on the shoulders of governments. They have the means and resources to dispense available medical interventions for the betterment of those afflicted by health issues. Moreover, this system can make many, especially youngsters, bereft from saving for their autumn years, or emergencies; consequently, making their future bleak. For example, in Japan, a recent survey revealed that many are unable to accumulate enough for their retirement since most of the income is being directed towards universal insurance.

Having said that, a group strongly asserts that ‘as you sow so shall you reap’. If one starts funding for those suffering from ill-health today, in the future someone will do the same for them too. This kindness will precipitate an ever-lasting loop of support for each other. Similarly, the world is facing unprecedented incidence of disease, and their treatments are exorbitantly priced, mainly for the destitute populace. This arrangement will aid many in alleviating the monetary burden and afford treatments. To corroborate, many in France pay a substantial amount for the healthcare on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, helping a number of destitute ill to avail suitable medical treatments.

To conclude, disputes aside, everyone should pay for unified national health insurance since it will enable creation of a socially assuring   network and  allow many to afford treatments - rather than abandoning them - and such gestures will surely have reciprocal results for the payers.

In many countries, companies hire more men than women for certain positions. Some people believe that employers should be required to recruit equal numbers of men and women in every field. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In many countries, companies hire more men than women for certain positions. Some people believe that employers should be required to recruit equal numbers of men and women in every field. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the  issue of whether gender bias should be relinquished while  hiring personnel because many businesses still resort to selecting more men compared to women. I strongly feel that employment  should be afforded on the basis of abilities rather than sex-based selection. 

A lobby strongly asserts that recruiting an individual should be based on qualification not on gender. One should have essential degrees and certifications to prove their worth to occupy a certain position. If one does not have specific education - whether male or female, they will be unable to do justice to the duties related to the job. As a result, this will create problems for themselves, as well as for employers. 

Additionally, skills should enjoy greater precedence over gender. One with appropriate requisite skills and seasoning  should  be prioritized over the idea of embracing gender-specific or gender-neutral approach: the former hold greater relevance in functions critical to operations. For example, in fields such as robotics and medicine, only profound knowhow and relevant experience can help deal with on-hand problems, and present optimum solutions.

Furthermore, the focus should be on assessing the approach rather than just evaluating a job aspirant on the basis of their sex. Many modern organizations have started shortlisting new entrants on the basis of psychological assessment and psychometric tests, which aid them in evaluating the reactions to challenges, approaches espoused to surmount those, and problem-solving capabilities  of prospective employees, and  in these examinations, they rarely ask for gender descriptions.  

In conclusion, disputes apart, while choosing the candidate, businesses should focus on education, skills and psychological capacities, rather than whether they are males or females. This will truly help in blurring gender differences, and present equitable opportunities to both sexes.

Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishments. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle these problems?

Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishments. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle these problems?

The world is witnessing an unusual behaviour where those convicted for the first time tend to repeat their deviant behavior upon completing their first sentence. This essay will share a few reasons for this propensity, and suggest some viable solution to overcome this predicament. 

To start with, a lobby strongly asserts that the first retribution may not be severe enough to make the culprit realise the intensity of the wrongdoing. In other words, many serious crimes: murder, assault and many more, are handed a nominal punishment: doing community service. This motivates antisocial elements to indulge into more unlawful activities since they know that there will be a petty punishment for major offence. For example, a recent survey revealed that many first time law breakers seldom shy away from partaking in endeavors aimed at infringing laws since they know that they would be let off with a light penalty, which they can easily fulfill. 

Having said that, there are a number of solutions available at hand. The lawmakers should resort to strict punitive measures to dissuade criminals, thereby  inciting a fear that illegal actions will fetch serious consequences every time they engage in any unlawful undertakings. Moreover, the government should endeavor to train such people in alternative trades so as to allow them to join the mainstream after their first sentence. This will help effectively  disengage them from their deviant ways, provide them employment and meaning to life, and keep them away from hideous thoughts.

In conclusion, the causes for repetitive unlawful behavior is absence of strict punishment for, which motivates the first-timers to continue with antisocial means, but the remedies are imposing stringent laws to make them understand the gravity of their misdemeanors, and policy makers could create jobs to keep them busy and employed.

All types of advertising should be banned because they are damaging to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

All types of advertising should be banned because they are damaging to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A general perception of contemporary times is aligned with a view that there should be an embargo on all kinds of adverts since they provoke harmful practices. I partially agree with this perspective and shall discuss in the following paragraphs.

Some propound that adverts have an unfavorable influence, especially on the younger generation. This is to say, young minds are beguiled by the virtual and tempting presentation of fast food, laden with high levels of saturated fat; consequently, pushing them into over-eating, making them corpulent.  Moreover, the multitude of ads being pushed to the consumers are unregulated, forcing many to squander money on purposeless and unintentional purchases. For example, a recent study revealed that there has been a dramatic increment in the mindless spending; similar products are portrayed on screens repeatedly making them buy unconsciously and without need.

However, many debunk these allegations, and feel that adverts hold an imperative place: they act as a medium of disseminating information. The campaign of Polio vaccine national televisions and newspapers in India,  helped engender extensive awareness, persuading citizens to join hands in eradicating this deadliest disease. Thus, proscribing ads will make people oblivious of this ailment, allowing it  to bounce back. Similarly, the world of media creates employment for many: directors, acoustic technicians, actors, and so forth; consequently, augmenting the employment index every year. To corroborate, in Japan, The House of Usher, a multinational advertising company, renders employment to thousands, thereby decreasing unemployment levels.

In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, one must weigh the consequences of prohibiting publicity since these act as information channels and support many by providing jobs. Therefore, only unnecessary adverts promoting unhealthy habits and extravagance must be curtailed, while the ones that fulfill the purpose of spreading awareness should be allowed to continue.  

Many people believe that reducing the speed limit is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are other measures that could be put in place? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

Many people believe that reducing the speed limit is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are other measures that could be put in place? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

Nowadays, as safety on roads is becoming a major concern, alleviating speed range seems to be the best solution. I believe there are some other possible and practical ways to tackle this problem, which will be discussed in the following paragraphs, along with their benefits and drawbacks.

To start with, one of the practical ways is to install traffic cameras on the roads. The main advantage of this is that many will be dissuaded by the presence of the cameras and stay within the required permitted speed; consequently, reducing the number of accidents on road due to overspeeding. However, dispensing such an arrangement will cost several arms and legs to governments. Not only the installation but  also their upkeep will add more expense on the shoulders of the lawmakers.

Moreover, another approach is to increase penalty fees or impose sentences since none will be interested in getting fined, paying hefty charges or being punished. Not only will many vehicle users think twice about breaking the speed limit, this will also generate extra revenue for the state via collecting fines. This money can be utilized for upgrading the safety on road or improving overall infrastructure. Having said that, the con of this method is corruption as many will pursue the officer on duty to take bribes in order to avoid paying a colossal amount of fines. 

In conclusion, there are other viable ways to implement and ensure public safety on roads: increasing fines and installing cameras but these methods come at a price: expensive for the lawmakers and chances of bribing are some of the drawbacks. Hence the government should weigh all the approaches before implementing.

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether. Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether. Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

Benefits 

• Environmental pollution mitigation will alleviate disorders and disease 
• Noise pollution will be reduced 
• Destruction of ecologies will be prevented 
• Save money spent on climate control will be saved 

Drawbacks 

• People are foregoing the privilege of visiting their loved ones and acquaintances in person, especially those living overseas; weakening bonds 
• This propensity is also causing people to circumvent opportunities for receiving better medical care, education and employment opportunities, 
• Cultural exchange will stop 
• This will hamper business in several ways: tourism will come to a standstill, causing unemployment in the biggest commercial sector: tourism   
• Technology transfer will stop 

Undeniably, relinquishing flying, or minimizing it, can fetch a few short-term gains, it is likely to have severe ramifications not only for people but also for society at large.

The lobby supporting eliminating reliance on air travel assumes that it would force airlines to decrease the number of flights, resulting in less fuel being burnt. Consequently, the release of pollutants and greenhouse gases would be mitigated in great proportions: airplanes are considered to be the most polluting vehicles on this planet, and with fewer aircraft  getting airborne will mean reduced pollution. However, this presupposition lacks substance and proponents of this trend are barking up the wrong tree; air travel contributes a miniscule fraction to the ecological complications.

In contrast, this tendency will certainly cause several problems, both at micro and macro level, and the world will resign to the pre-aviation era, wherein travelling overseas will become onerous. Many will be deprived of opportunities to meet and reunite with their loved ones, and satisfy  themselves with virtual calls, gradually weakening their bonds. Similarly, those seeking better education, medical intervention, employment, and so forth, will be unable to access these. 

Additionally, the domino effect at a broader level will be far greater as this proclevity will jeopardize  the global efforts aimed at promoting cultural exchange, creating bonhomie between different communities, and preventing conflicts. Moreover, multiple economic sectors will be severely harmed, especially the tourism and hospitality industries, because the lesser number of travellers will cause closure of numerous businesses, engendering joblessness and lack of business. 

To conclude, although intentions driving this behavior are benign, the aftermath will result in unwarranted circumstances, and hamper commercial activities, as well as lives of individuals. Therefore, it can be said that the challenges resulting from this attitude overwhelm any advantages gained.

Some people believe that educating children at home provides more benefits than sending them to school. Do the advantages of home-schooling outweigh the disadvantages?

Some people believe that educating children at home provides more benefits than sending them to school. Do the advantages of home-schooling outweigh the disadvantages?

It is believed that sending little ones to school is less beneficial as compared to home schooling. This essay will discuss whether the merits outshine the drawbacks of this proposed system.

A lobby asserts that personal home tuitions provide absolute attention to learners. This is to say that, teachers focus only on one child without any distractions, or distributing attention to other students: a common feature of conventional classroom settings. Moreover, the curriculum and methodology can be adapted, or molded, according to the ability and preference of pupils. This aids in eliminating unnecessary subjects and choosing the right tools for teaching: presentation, videos, and so on, bolstering  the learning process and enhancing intrapersonal skills.

Having said that, a group strongly propounds that this arrangement has downsides too. One of them is that the children might have underdeveloped social skills since they are excluded from the everyday group afforded in a classroom, where students mingle with each other emotionally and socially. This can impede growth by turning youngsters into timid personalities, incapable of communicating effectively, and lacking confidence. Socialization is extremely essential for growing minds and an appropriate environment can only be rendered by classroom settings, which if missed can leave indelible marks on the young persona. Additionally, such systems are exorbitantly priced, taking them out of  reach for many families. For example, in Japan, many parents - even if they want to- are unable to afford home schooling services since these cost several arms and legs, and are beyond their financial abilities.

To conclude, the demerits of bringing formal tuition to home surely exceed the merits as the sheer cost of hiring personal schooling tutors is expensive and young learners are likely to suffer from lack of interpersonal skills, which could negatively affect them as adults.

Some people think that parents should pay money to encourage their children to help with housework (cleaning, cooking etc.). Others think that they should not pay money. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Some people think that parents should pay money to encourage their children to help with housework (cleaning, cooking etc.). Others think that they should not pay money. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

A great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the view whether to persuade youngsters to contribute to household chores by being compensated with monetary benefits: while some uphold this view, others believe the contrary. This essay will discuss both sides and share a viable opinion.

The proposal of persuading youngsters to contribute to household chores by using monetary benefits as a motivation has become a controversial issue, with some upholding it, others rejecting it. This essay will discuss both sides and share a viable opinion.

To start with, a lobby propounds that children learn the value of money and hard work. This is to say, when they are paid for the house work, young minds value earning money by working their fingers to the bone, leaving an enduring impact on them about such privileges not being accessible by sitting idle. For example, in Japan, to teach the importance of money, it is a custom for parents to reward their wards by completing the household tasks. 

Nevertheless, the skeptics protest and assert that such endeavors are an imperative component of family obligations, wherein everyone is expected to partake without expecting financial benefits, and thus, should not be in lieu of money. The children are a part of the family and by doing the tasks: laundry, doing dishes and much more, they are fulfilling the responsibility towards the house and family, which they will have to do on their own initiative as adults, and this system could upset the family arrangement and  environment.  

Moreover, this could have far-fetching ramifications, daughters and sons would become greedy, precipitating into situations where they might start thinking that every work will fetch them monetary resources, causing distortions in their psyche, and impeding their integration with society, where one has to often engage selflessly for the upheaval of community,  

In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, I believe that indulging in house duties is a responsibility of children and does not need any kind of monetary inducements/ stimulants in return.

In schools and universities, some girls tend to choose arts subjects, while boys choose to study science subjects. What are the reasons? Do you think this trend should be changed?

In schools and universities, some girls tend to choose arts subjects, while boys choose to study science subjects. What are the reasons? Do you think this trend should be changed?

It has been observed that females are inclined to study art, whereas males tend to attend science subjects. I firmly believe that this tendency is mainly caused by mental perceptions and social expectations, and should be eliminated.

To begin with, many people still believe that boys are naturally good at STEM subjects. This belief is deeply rooted in society, and even many women have started to accept it. In developing countries, parents often expect their sons to study science so they can get good jobs in the future, while daughters are encouraged to study simple subjects, get married, embrace family responsibilities, and join less challenging professional domains. Similarly, science education often costs more money, so parents prefer to invest in the studies of their sons. 

However, men and women have equal abilities and potential. If given the same opportunities, many women can do just as well as men in science. Famous female scientists like Marie Curie, Ada Lovelace, and Emilie du Châtelet have already proved that they can achieve great heights in these fields. The problem of gender discrimination in education should stop completely, and fortunately. in many societies are acting in that direction, with an increasing number of women already studying engineering and technology. This trend needs to proliferate fast to enable mankind to  realize its full potential, otherwise it will be bereft of talent that is not confined to sex, but is more conspicuously highlighted with innate abilities.   

To conclude, empowering women is very important for the development of any country. Females should be persuaded to study and choose any subject they like, including science. This change will bring more positive results and help create a fair, equal, and prosperous society.

Some people believe that anybody can be a teacher, if he is trained properly. Others think that there are some personal qualities a good teacher should have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Some people believe that anybody can be a teacher, if he is trained properly. Others think that there are some personal qualities a good teacher should have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

In this contemporary era, education plays a crucial role by virtue of being the key to success. A few assume that anyone can become a tutor if they undergo training, while others believe that teaching requires certain essential personal qualities. I am personally in favour of the latter view.

To begin with the former view, undeniably, training can turn one into effective tutors as it can render them  necessary knowledge about the planning curriculum and strategies,  including creating lesson planning, and classroom management. Additionally, this can enhance their confidence by imparting them knowhow about up-to-date teaching strategies and policies that can enhance the learning experience of pupils. For instance, in a recent report by New York Times,  modern teaching concepts embrace use of non-retributive measures and use of student-friendly engagement policies like interactive classroom learning, allowing educators to structure their lessons aimed at removing obstacles facing pupils, and encouraging them to involve profoundly in sessions, thereby making them study better.  

Having said that, no state-of-the-art programs promising disseminating teaching strategies can replicate the innate quality educators require: empathy and sensitivity, moral ethics, efficient communication, and passion to teach, are primary qualities required to effectively negotiate this task.  These traits help one to understand the basic needs of their audience in the classroom, and allocate appropriate time to each according to their needs as well, so  that they can learn on their own without feeling embarrassed, and alienated. Such teaching professionals have always helped churn out excellent academic outcomes. 

In conclusion, although training is an essential part for modern schooling as this can apprize professionals involved in this occupation about latest tools and policies, a successful teacher is the one with inbuilt abilities: empathizing, and connecting with individual students effectively.  

Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Why Newspaper 

• Authenticated  
• Comprehensive news 
• Printed words have the ability to be retained longer 

Why other  media

• Up to date - minute by minute information 
• Portability - better than carrying clumsy newspapers 
• Graphical content - videos and photos - making it easier to grab news without paying attention to the task of reading  

The advent of the digital era has laid multiple sources of gaining updates about occurrences from world over. While many still commit their allegiance to the newspaper, while some are more keen about using other mediums. This essay will analyze this suggestion and emanate a justified conclusion whether the newspaper is better comparatively to other sources.

Newspapers have endured their reputation as the most reliable source of delivering daily news. The reports presented in this tool are accurate and authenticated, always verified from genuine sources; the journalists and reporters involved in gathering inputs are quite professionally trained, have investigative approach, and are generally unbiased, and thus, present the information that illustrates the true picture of any event rather than acting partisan.  

Moreover, traditionally, printed words enjoy greater appeal than what is accessed on the screen. Since childhood, one is accustomed to reading books and magazines, and they develop an affinity to these mediums, by virtue of the fact that printed words have the ability to get permanently etched in the minds of readers. To illustrate, many accept that they love reading paper versions of the Washington Post, and New York Times, due to being able to remember  each word of reports thoroughly for long. 

However, the other school of thought, especially the younger generation, depend on alternate means such as the internet, social media and radio etc., for this means can provide them minute by minute updates. For example, platforms like twitter, facebook and news portals, and TV-based media channels cover current events as they are happening, often with videos.

In conclusion, I feel that even though other ways of getting informed offer speed, newspapers will remain the best medium of delivering news by virtue of being controlled by genuine sources and professionals.  

As countries develop and people’s standard of living improves, environmental damage naturally increases and cannot be completely avoided. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

As countries develop and people’s standard of living improves, environmental damage naturally increases and cannot be completely avoided. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary era, many are inclined towards better living standards, which has myriad implications on nature and the global environment. However, I fail to subscribe to this notion because advanced technology and awareness can play a significant role in protecting the earth.

To commence with, improvement in living standards has incremented needs in all aspects, such as food production, urban infrastructural development, and setting up industries and projects to meet all demands. This has increased the demand of rural and urban land to accommodate housings, factories, ports, food industries, and so forth, thereby resulting in deforestation, releasing carbon, creating pollution not only in air, but water, and land, affecting the overall environment adversely. For instance, many developing cities like Delhi, are facing humongous air pollution due to a surge in the number of vehicles on roads and increased demand for industrialisation.

However, these environmental damages can be controlled by various state-of-the-art methods and practices, government intervention plays a crucial role here, strict regulations towards recycling and reuse holds great promises for safeguarding the environment from reckless abuse of natural resources. This will allow enhancements in the quality of life without impacting the environment. Additionally, usage of solar and wind power, sustainable building infrastructures and materials will reduce the demand of natural resources, as well as render all necessary comforts and commodities necessary for human consumption. For example, governments of Asian countries are promoting solar power for their residential buildings to alleviate the production of electricity and encouraging environmental awareness.

To conclude, better living standards can be achieved by awareness among the people and policy makers, sustainable concepts, stricter guidelines for manufacturing industries for pollution mitigation, these introductions methods will definitely control the damage to the environment.