Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A  profound debate has ensued among various quarters regarding circumscribing smoking in public areas. The supporters of this proposal believe that it not only impacts the health of the smokers but also the people who are nearby.

Prohibiting smoking publicly is an imperative step that could go a long way. Several studies have revealed the rising incidence of respiratory disorders and terminal diseases, due to passive smoking,  among those who have never consumed tobacco in any form. This arrangement will render necessary safeguards to non-smokers, helping them evade inhaling hazardous compounds: carbon dioxide and monoxide,  released with every puff of tobacco. Likewise,  it would help those ailing from diseases like asthma as they  would not need to  take extra precautions: carrying inhalers or wearing masks as safeguards against unwanted inhaling of hazardous ingredients discharged into air by those smoking. 

On top of that, publicly smoking also can have a far reaching impact on young children, who being inquisitive get overwhelmed by observing others smoking. They are already under the influence of various advertisements that try to present cigarettes as a sign of a macho personality and a strong and rebellious attitude. 

Nonetheless, those cynical about this idea of forbidding smoking in the public domain, feel that the environment is already exposed to myriads of the fumes and gasses emanating from the vehicles and industries. Therefore, prohibiting smoking will be an injustice to the smokers as they might feel that they are being discriminated against.

In hindsight, I strongly concur with the proposal of outlawing smoking in communal domains; this seemingly harmless personal foible is jeopardizing the public health and childhood. All counterarguments rendered must be overlooked: health of the populace cannot be put at risk for the sake of a minority.   

Some people believe that children in the past had an easier life, while others think that life is easier for children today. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that children in the past had an easier life, while others think that life is easier for children today. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Life was effortless in the past 

• Upbringing was simple without skyhigh expectations from parents 

• Priority was on quality rearing rather than attainments 

• Academic competition and aspirations were not uphill 

• Most lived in extended families and did not have to be worried about being cared for

• More opportunities for outdoor activities, sports, hobbies and lack of restrictions due to safe social environment 

• There was an environment sans pollution 

Life is easier now 

• Access to technology has allowed children to gather knowledge about any subject 

• More resources at disposal to enable one to explore their desired field of interest 

• More leisure activities available 

• Healthcare services are better which allow youngsters to circumvent health issues that were a challenge in the past 

• Greater awareness about children rights  

A rousing debate ensues when it comes to comparing childhood in the past and present. While some perceive that the former offered better lifestyles to juveniles owing to fewer expectations, others favor contemporary  times owing to technology-driven facilities the young generation can experience.   

Matters were quite straightforward for youngsters in the past owing to lack of uphill expectations from families and society, and stepe competition from peers in academics and other realms, affording a relatively relaxed way of life. For instance, neither parents nor the community gauged them on their academic and extra-curricular attainments, and they did not have to consistently expose themselves to the daunting task of preparing for exams, competitions, and performances. 

Similarly, the friendlier communal environment, and availability of appropriate outdoor amenities, extended unparalleled freedom and opportunities to go outdoors and engage in sports, and other physical endeavors, with their friends and others. This enabled them to sustain their physical and mental wellbeing; and foster bonds with others, including individuals of their own age or older than them, forging strong social relationships without needing to attend special sessions or classes: a common feature of contemporary times.

However, for some, technology has turned life effortless for young individuals today, for they can access education as per their convenience, and choose the field where they would like to engage professionally; and also pursue pastimes as per their likes and dislikes, regardless of the socioeconomic backgrounds: these were considered a novelty available to only a few fortunate.

In hindsight, both perspectives hold great substance: where the bygone days offered simplicity, the other provides ease of life to the upcoming generation, through technological innovations, implying that perspectives transform with the passing epoch, with objective being rendering quality upbringing to young people.

Do the advantages of private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes outweigh the disadvantages of public transport (trains, buses and taxis)? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience.

Do the advantages of private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes outweigh the disadvantages of public transport (trains, buses and taxis)? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience.

There is a profound debate raging whether dividends accrued by self-owned vehicles outshine the pitfalls of communal transit. This matter needs a deeper analysis and before arriving a plausible conclusion if this perception is true. 

Personal conveyance affords umpteen benefits: it offers convenience to the populace; one can travel anywhere at any time, they do not have to abide by any schedule, a common feature of mass transit. Similarly, they can start their journey right from the doorstep instead of going to a bus stand or train station. 

Also, this medium is accessible under any weather conditions: rain, snow, scorching heat of the sun, it provides unprecedented comfort. Moreover, they can travel freely without any stress as they and their luggage is secured and safe, and this aids them to complete their journey hassle-free, whereas such ease cannot be extended by the communal commutes, for one has to keep themselves updated about weather since bad weather can also lead to cancellation of services, and the security of baggage is many times a matter of concern.  

Nevertheless, despite having certain drawbacks, using mass transportation can be rewarding: it is a cheap mode and anyone can afford to travel by this means. Additionally, there is little hassle while traveling; one does not have to worry about parking, traffic jams and snarls. Further, it renders ample opportunities to socialize with new people, by exposing oneself to strangers. Above all, mass transit offers effective safeguard against the rampant deterioration of the planet as this method contributes towards alleviating the pollution and preventing deforestation. 

To conclude, undeniably, benefits yielded by shared transport effortlessly eclipse the disadvantages by being environmentally-friendly, and offering within budget and stress free travel. Thus, this notion is misplaced: I feel it is the other way round.  

Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?   

There has been an enigmatic change observed in environmental conditions over the past few decades, by virtue of modern facilities and interest towards recreational activities, the concurrent populace has stripped the natural resources and deteriorated the quality of surroundings, which will have adverse repercussions on the populating the planet tomorrow.  Thus, it is extremely critical to preserve the earth for tomorrow. 

To begin with, the planet is the ancestral legacy as they invested their money and time in creating a perfect living place for all, and hence, it is the responsibility of the present individuals to preserve the earth in its pristine form, and sustain their unwavering efforts to enable them to pass it on to the rightful owners: the inhabitants of tomorrow. Moreover, keeping the surroundings free from toxic substances and developing a sustainable livelihood for the newcomers can only be planned today; if this task is not executed right away, it may be too late for the next generation to survive. 

Similarly, health completely depends on the evolving environment, and the way things are deteriorating, one suspects whether those populating the planet some years from now, will be able to access clean air to inhale. For instance, the concentration of toxic gasses emanating from vehicle fumes, stubble burning, industrial emissions is making the current populace vulnerable to several severe ailments, and if nothing is done, the environment could become hostile, unable to support any life form.    

Besides this, human activities are the root causes of climatic shifts and due to that they are facing serious challenges for their survival. For example, one of its major effects is global warming which is precipitating unpredictable climatic shift that often precipitates sudden flooding and droughts, and its impact is being observed widely even today, and  if this continues unabated, the inhabitants of tomorrow will not be able to lead a smooth lifestyle and face challenges in every walk of life.   

In hindsight, protecting the environment in its natural form is the only way to safeguard the survival of future generations, and for that one must concentrate on the alternative practices for sustainable development, which will not only benefit the recent but also to the ones who will perpetuate this tradition.

Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

YES 

• Today, professional skills are extremely important for everyone without which one cannot successfully survive in society : society also requires their contribution to remain functional - thus schools must only fulfill this parameter 
• They could also take up the profession connected to that subject easily since they would not need a special occupational training 
• This will help employers since they will not need to spend humongous money on training recruits in various trades 
• Society could get required skills quickly. 
• Law abiding nationals are an important requirement, otherwise there will be anarchy in society  

NO 

• Formal education is meant to develop all-round personality of youngsters: creativity, in-depth thinking ability, and ability to look  forward in life: these traits can only be fostered in formative years. 

The purpose of schooling has long sparked a fierce debate with some asserting that educational institutes should primarily aim to turn youngsters into responsible citizens and productive workers, rather than focusing on their overall growth. I partially agree with this, and would like to elucidate my views with a plausible conclusion.

A core function of schooling is indeed to prepare young people for social roles. They should promote values like teamwork, respect, community involvements, which are fundamental for civic engagement. For instance, the formal curriculum should incorporate social topics and volunteer programs, allowing young learners to grasp knowledge about civic responsibilities and cultivating an understanding of how they can contribute to their communities. In this way, they will play a significant role in molding pupils into adults enlightened about their social obligations. 

Similarly, academic and technical skills can prepare them for future job readiness. Proficiency in subjects such as mathematics, science, and language arts, lays the foundation for a wide range of careers, ensuring that those studying possess the competencies needed to thrive at work force. These programs can allow students to develop trade competitiveness, and aim for trade-centric  learning in university courses, saving them time and money. 

On the other hand, reducing education solely to be a means of producing workers overlooks the importance of individual growth. These establishments provide an outlet where youngsters first explore their unique interests, talents and passions, discovering their personality and abilities that contribute  to self-expression and emotional intelligence, which are valuable in all walks of life.  

In conclusion, it is essential to train young minds to be proficient trade specialists and prudent inhabitants of a nation, nonetheless, nurturing individuality and resourcefulness is equally crucial. Thus, a balanced approach that values societal readiness and personal development is recommended.  

Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your opinion(in conclusion) and examples from your experience.

Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your opinion(in conclusion) and examples from your experience.

 There is a paradigm shift while making investments, authorities prefer to spend money safeguarding fauna instead of fulfilling basic needs for human beings. This trend has several advantages and disadvantages associated with it and I will be discussing both in the following paragraphs.

 To start with, this shift in priorities is helping preserve delicate ecological balance, comprising various animals, and protecting the future of humans as a result. Undeniably, if this arrangement is disturbed, it will have a direct implication for society. For example, disappearance of honey bees is likely to result in the absence of the medium of pollinating fruit and vegetables, depriving mankind of food. Similarly, this is aiding in conservation of habitats of exotic fauna: the forests,  the premium climate regulators that help recycle the air, and also invite precipitation.  Moreover, forests are also considered a rich source of raw materials in terms of making medicines and performing scientific research, to name a few, and this emphasis is assisting humans in saving this invaluable resource.

However, there are humongous downsides of this approach as cited by skeptics: this might create hurdles in human development as diverting monetary resources from essential projects such as rendering fundamental amenities: food shelter and clothing;  and quality education, health care, and infrastructure, might exacerbate the problems facing marginalized communities. Many are struggling to access basic needs like clean water, food etc. and are surviving in the tents in all the weather conditions. Authorities are taking human beings lightly by depriving them of their basic needs.

 To sum up, I opine that safeguarding wildlife is important, but it should not come at the expense of putting people in danger. A balanced approach is necessary to protect the conservation and human needs.

In recent years, there has been a significant decline in the diversity of plant and animal species across numerous countries. What are the potential causes of this issue? How can we mitigate it?

In recent years, there has been a significant decline in the diversity of plant and animal species across numerous countries. What are the potential causes of this issue? How can we mitigate it?

Attributes of the problem 

• Denuding the planet is leading to habitat loss
• Industrial agriculture
• Industry set up
• Logging
• Creating housing and other activities
• Overexploitation and poaching
• Pollution and climate change

Panacea  

• Sustainable development policy: 
• use of green fuels/ ecofriendly farming techniques 
• Recycling 
• Strong environmental laws 
• Espousing innovative methods: vertical farming/ cities 
• Earmaking areas for wildlife and circumscribing any human intervention there 
• Proscribing poaching and sale of banned animal parts, and using punitive methods to discourage such acts 
• Create awareness among people about the ramifications of such a loss  

The shrinking variety of flora and fauna has become a pressing concern for contemporary society. This can be attributed to several reasons, making it imperative to discover plausible mechanisms to surmount this jeopardizing challenge.

This catastrophic trend majorly is driven by the greed for economic progress, precipitating reckless abuse of nature - denuding of the planet to accommodate farming, factories, residential areas, and amenities, among others - and consequently, destroying micro-habitats and food chains. This disrupts local ecologies, causing disappearance of endemic plants and animals, and invasion by pioneer species of both. To corroborate, Amazon is a prominent example of this pattern, where indiscriminate deforestation is being carried in the name of development, which is pushing exotic plants and wildlife into extinction, only to be replaced by artificially-introduced species.

Moreover, the indiscriminate use of chemically-synthesized fertilizers and insecticides in agriculture, coupled with rampant emissions from industry, households and transporting is engendering distortions in climatic patterns, and global warming, turning environment incompatible for almost all forms of life, pushing many into extinction and prompting destruction of heterogeneity of living beings - affecting versatility of food chain, except humans.

It is critical to surmount this complication before it wreaks havoc. Although immediate panacea may not be available, prioritising concepts like vertical farming and vertical cities could pave way for not only rewilding of green buffers, reinvigorating wildlife but also mitigate predicaments, like rising global temperatures and pollution, facing the environment. Likewise, creating sanctuaries for animals and vegetation and circumscribing human intervention in those locations could help restore biodiversity to a great extent.

To recap, the hunger for rapid development has forced manipulation of the ecology, benefiting mankind but proving detrimental for other organisms and affecting their variety, but prudent steps involving innovative concepts can help resolve this imbroglio.

Many cities are replacing cars with bicycles. What are the reasons for this? Which do you think is better?

Many cities are replacing cars with bicycles. What are the reasons for this? Which do you think is better?

Nowadays, several urban locales have started opting for cycles and proscribing use of cars. This can be attributed to several causes, but when it comes deciding which of the two modes is superior is a fiercely debated issue.  

The  reasons behind this paradigm includes cars becoming a major source of traffic jams and snarls, and accidents.  Similarly,  they are a prominent source of air pollution, leading to more environmental issues. Additionally, these are encroaching pedestrian space in shopping districts, roads and residential areas, causing chaos,  making neighborhoods don an ugly look, and fueling safety concerns among pedestrians. To corroborate this, a survey revealed that 40% of pedestrian space in Toronto is occupied by the four wheelers, resulting in four to five accidents every fortnight. 

Although  cars are known to offer comfortable rides and protection from extreme weather, apart from allowing families to travel together, pedaling is incomparable when it comes to reducing the cost of creating and maintaining infrastructure; these humble two-wheelers do not stipulate an elaborate road infrastructure: less space is needed for riding and parking.  

Moreover, it is the cleanest mode of commuting as it does not produce any emissions, helping alleviate  greenhouse gas discharge, and thus, air pollution. Likewise,  it also promotes physical activity, leading to better health outcomes, and ultimately, resulting in healthcare cost reduction.  To exemplify, the city of Guelph encouraged the use of cycles by providing it for free for forty hours per week to the residents, and this initiative recorded a 40% downfall in issues related to cardio and joints. 

 In hindsight, it can be concluded that cities are more cautious about environment and health. Hence, preferring and promoting the use of bicycles is justified since this 19th century invention can ensure a clean environment, and well being. 

In many countries, large infrastructure projects are increasingly funded and managed by private companies rather than governments. To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development?

 In many countries, large infrastructure projects are increasingly funded and managed by private companies rather than governments. To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Pros 

• Fast-tracking of project initiation: private players can arrange money quickly

• They can make modifications and also arrange extra resources in something goes  missing during the project 

• Appropriate use of resources: manpower and material 

• Time bound project: professionals involved are not given an infinite timeline 

• These concerns are exposed to the threat of losses, they innovate and bring improvements

Cons    

• Since private companies invest for profits, their products are generally too expensive and beyond the reach of the masses 

• These entities also sometimes tend to follow malpractices and launch products without testing for their safety. 

It is being observed that private participation in infrastructural development is usurping  government-run endeavours. Although this might present certain challenges like exorbitant access fee, I vehemently feel that it is a favourable evolution owing to affording speed and efficiency. 

This  trend has rendered impetus and competence  to undertakings aimed at the inception, expansion and enhancements of areas, and services, for public use. Privately-owned and run endeavours can be initiated quickly since the planning and funding of such activities do not need to pass through bureaucratic bottlenecks. For example, the redevelopment of harbour at the old port of San Francisco could not be completed even in 15 years, post senate approval, but Hyundai after taking over this assignment, finished the task within 3 years, and made the site operational in 2012, generating commerce and employment for the locals.

Similarly, involvement of private enterprise in such ventures precipitate innovation; these entities seek profits, and to maximise their earnings, they deploy state-of-the-art methods and equipment, alleviating wastage and pilferage, and multiplying yields alongwith/besides the quality of products and services. To corroborate, wherever mobile networks are in the private hands, outages are negligible and users receive excellent service. 

However, those skeptical of this handover alleged that the venues and products laid at disposal by commercial entities might be unaffordable for a majority of consumers, especially the marginalized, because the prices and charges could be beyond reach. Nevertheless, these concerns can be addressed by lawmakers subsidizing such facilities for the poor.

In hindsight, the concerns about over-priced output because of privately-managed infrastructural undertakings can be negotiated through government funding, and let this pattern prevail and proliferate, by virtue of this being extremely rewarding not only in terms of founding new initiatives quickly but also ushering innovative techniques and concepts. 

Some people think that hobbies should be linked with technology, while others believe that it is not necessary for hobbies to be involved with technology. Discuss, what is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your experience.

Some people think that hobbies should be linked with technology, while others believe that it is not necessary for hobbies to be involved with technology. Discuss, what is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your experience.

There is a profound debate raging across varied sections of society whether technology should penetrate the domain of pastime endeavors. Some subscribe to this notion, while others dissent. I will elucidate both the aspects in the following paragraphs and share my opinion about it.

To start with, several commentators profess that modern tools should be used in practicing leisure as it can save resources like money and time, especially those facing paucity of both the resources, wasted  in learning something new. To exemplify, one can enlighten themselves about their passion: cooking, music, and so on, by using internet-based platforms such as YouTube without parting with a dime, or traveling to grasp the knowledge. Moreover, the raw material or other things can be purchased sitting at home only by browsing online portals. To corroborate, several sculpture enthusiasts, primarily youngsters, can now source modeling clay through  popular eportals Strike CLay and Designer Clay, selling such material,  and other tools to fulfill their desires of practicing passion of making statues and idols.  

On the flip side, critics vehemently profess that free time haunts are meant to be practiced in leisure time,  and should be kept away from technology; every sphere of life is already overwhelmed and surrounded by technology, and such endeavors should be meant to earn oneself a healthy distraction of engaging with modern machines and techniques. Moreover, this is likely to kill the spirit of adventure and enjoyment afforded by free time undertakings, making one bereft of opportunities to earn  a sense of fulfillment and discovering something new.

To conclude, disputes aside, I opine that involving technology in hobbies is not a bad option at all because it is making things easier for those passionate about following their passion, but lack time and money to do so. 

Should hospital funding prioritize medical equipment or medical professionals?

Should hospital funding prioritize medical equipment or medical professionals?

The allocation of healthcare funding has become a topic of debate, with some advocating for investment in advanced medical technology, while others emphasizing the relevance of adequately compensating healthcare professionals. Since  both aspects are crucial in delivering high-quality medical care, a balanced approach that ensures even funding is recommended.

Infusing monetary resources in state-of-the-art tools and methods can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy. Cutting-edge equipment such as MRI scanners and robotic surgical systems allow for early disease detection, minimal invasive procedures, and improved patient outcomes. For instance, robotic-assisted surgeries have revolutionized complex operations by reducing human error and enhancing precision. Furthermore, diagnostic tools enable physicians to identify illnesses in their initial stages, thereby increasing survival rates and mitigating long-term treatment costs. Given these advancements, channelizing substantial resources to technical upgradation is imperative for modernizing healthcare services.

On the other hand, the role of medical caregivers remains indispensable. No matter how sophisticated medical devices become, they are ultimately reliant on skilled doctors, nurses, and technicians for proper utilization. A well-trained and adequately staffed workforce ensures continuous care of the ailing, timely medical interventions, and emotional support — elements that machines cannot render. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical need for frontline healthcare workers, as hospitals faced overwhelming patient loads due to workforce shortages. Without sufficient financial support for salaries, training, and recruitment, even the most technologically advanced hospitals would struggle to function effectively.

In conclusion, while investment in medical technology fosters innovation and enhances treatment capabilities, healthcare professionals are the backbone of the medical system. Therefore, an optimal strategy would be to disperse funding equitably, ensuring that both the domains receive essential financial support. This holistic approach guarantees that the healthcare environment can deliver high-quality care through using these two inseparable constituents.  

Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life. Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.

Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life. Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.

The debate surrounding whether early childhood experiences, or teenage encounters, shape future lives more profoundly, is complex. Both stages play a pivotal role in personal development and each contributes uniquely to the trajectory of life.

Experiences during early childhood are foundational. The First year of life is critical for cognitive, emotional and social growth. Juveniles form bonds, develop language skills, and learn basic behavior through interactions with caregivers and surroundings. For instance, a nurturing environment where a child feels supported fosters confidence and resilience. Negative experience, such as neglect or trauma, can have long-lasting effects, shaping their approach to challenges and relationships in later years. Early exposure to values, routine and curiosity also sets the stage for life long habits and aspirations. 

Conversely, adolescence is a period of significant transformation as one passing through this stage navigates academic pressures, peer influences, and identity formation, which often impact career access and social behavior. For example, teenagers involved in extracurricular activities, like sports or arts, tend to develop teamwork and discipline. Positive mentorship during this stage  can also inspire long term ambitions. However, the risks of peer pressure and impulsive decisions are prominent, making this phase equally impactful. 

In conclusion, while childhood experiences provide the base for emotional and intellectual growth, teenage experiences refine and expand these foundations since both stages ensure nurturing well-rounded individuals ready to negotiate life complexities.

Nowadays not many young people chose to work in the farming industry? Why do you think that is? How could young people be encouraged to work in this industry?

Nowadays not many young people chose to work in the farming industry? Why do you think that is? How could young people be encouraged to work in this industry?

Of late, agriculture has been witnessing an exodus of the youth from agriculture. This shift stems from several factors that make the sector less appealing and lucrative compared to other industries, but there are ways to get them back.

The chief driver of this propensity is the reputation of farming being labor-intensive and financially unstable. Many believe that this sector offers fewer opportunities for economic growth and career advancement. Moreover, societal attitudes associate farming with low social status, discouraging many from pursuing it as a career. With rapid urbanization, the young are drawn to cities, seeking jobs in technology, finance, among others, affording themselves better incomes and lifestyles. Furthermore, absence of technological integration in rural areas perpetuates the image of this occupation being outdated and monotonous.  Another issue is the insufficient exposure to agriculture during formal education. Schools and universities often emphasize  urban-centric professions, and overlook the importance of this essential industry. 

Reversing this trend is possible through  targeted initiatives. Governments can provide subsidies, grants or tax benefits to young farmers to improve profitability. Likewise, introducing modern technology:  drones, precision farming, and smart irrigation systems, could make this field more innovative and appealing. For example, the success of vertical farming has shown how technology can transform this realm.

Educational reforms espousing specialized courses emphasizing the importance of this occupation, could prove to be instrumental in popularizing this sector again. Universities could offer scholarships or internships to promote farming as a viable career. Also, campaigns showcasing the achievements of young successful farmers can further inspire others to follow the suit.

In conclusion, the waning interest in this domain among the young stems from its perceived challenges. However, through modernization, financial incentives and education, farming can once again become a promising professional venue for future generations.

Some people think that it's a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it's important to keep working life completely separate from social life. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think that it's a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it's important to keep working life completely separate from social life. Discuss both views and give your opinion

In modern times, individuals believe that socializing with colleagues after working hours is a good idea,  whereas some believe that it is important to keep their work life and social life totally separated. I will analyze both the views and share my plausible opinion. 

To begin with, having a strong relationship at work can help develop a sense of coordination and make group discussion easier by helping one familiarize with colleagues, which can help create cooperation with co-workers, and make the work more interesting. Moreover, nowadays, people are spending more time in the office because of the long working hours, so socializing will make them work more comfortably, and in a friendly environment. In addition to these physical advantages, the confidence level of individuals develops, if they will balance both personal and professional life. 

However, others are against this practice, and claim that this propensity can cause complications on the  professional front as people tend to misuse intimate information by spreading rumors about coworkers, creating problems for the affected people both at professional and personal levels.  Moreover, this could lead to groupism and spoil the work environment, hamper productivity.  For instance, recently a survey was organised in the information technology sector and it has observed that most of the gossip leaked out because of over sharing at work places and this has turned out to be worse. Moreover, people take advantage of the innocence and use those topics against the employees. 

In hindsight, dispute aside, after looking at the disadvantages people take because of being overly friendly the individuals should spend their free time with families and get back to work with free minds and fresh thoughts. 

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if Individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if Individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Undoubtedly, rules and regulations are the foundation of any society. Without them, there will be chaos and people will go astray. Some accept this notion, while others believe in individual freedom. I shall delve deeper into this discussion and share a well-reasoned conclusion in the following paragraphs.

To start with, implementing the legal guidelines are necessary to avoid anarchy in the country as people will be treated respectfully and equally. This will not only protect populace from unlawful activities: theft, robbery, trespassing but also from heinous crime such as rape, murder to name a few, which can be a nightmare for everyone. For example: India has very strict laws for crime against women, and lawmakers keep amending these laws from time to time, resulting in a 40% drop in these crimes. Apart from that, special policies are implemented for the below poverty line population, where they can enjoy all the basic amenities: food, health care, education. A survey was conducted in Indiana University which revealed that countries with special laws for the marginalized afforded them a better quality of life.

Nevertheless, those advocating liberation from these frameworks feel that, restrict individual freedom in terms of innovation and lead to excessive bureaucracy, precipitating  unnecessary hurdles for businesses. However, they have also forgotten that history speaks for itself. Not even a single ruler in history has been able to govern the nation without edicts. Where society progressed and stands today, it is because of all the evolving legal norms that everyone complied with.

 To conclude, I stand in favor of implementing legal procedures for the betterment of society and to bring order to the social environment; the populace flourishes more in well-behaved surroundings  than in a disorderly one.

It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Is this positive or negative development? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your experience

It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Is this positive or negative development? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your experience. 

Revolution in air travel has made it possible for everyone to undertake journeys anywhere in the world. Even though some raise concerns about the detrimental impact of this phenomena, I feel this evolution is largely beneficial, and shall elucidate my stand in the following paragraphs.

This trend has empowered common people by allowing them to travel farther than distances than they could in the past, letting them at more destinations to their vacation list, and allowing them to turn their holidays into more exciting. Besides this, they can even go to meet their near and dear ones living in other parts of the world and reunite with them.  For instance, as per popular magazine, ”Travelogue”, over the last three decades, there has been a 40% jump in the numbers choosing to go abroad in order to visit their relatives, sometimes that was out of bounce for them for most part of the previous century.

Similarly, this has also brought educational and economic advantages; one can freely go to any country, and seek better education or well compensated employment to improve their profession profile, and their living standards respectively since within budget fare and lack of restrictions as fuel a sense of security among those seeking greener pastures. 

Nevertheless, the only pitfall that one can enumerate is the indirect effect on the environment. Many fear that in the long run that this might lead to an increase in air pollution because as more and more travel overseas, the number of aircrafts will also increase and cause a spike in air pollution.

To conclude, disputes aside, this evolution is by all means favorable, by virtue of offering opportunities to the global populace to fulfill their requirements in terms of leisure, education, employment and meeting loved ones.

 

Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries. Explain the main causes and effects of this problem, and suggest some possible solutions.

Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries. Explain the main causes and effects of this problem, and suggest some possible solutions.

Corpulence among juveniles is a pressing concern in the contemporary world, and is caused by a slew of reasons: unsound lifestyles choices. However, it is affecting youngsters at mental and physical level, making it imperative to discover prudent remedies to help eradicate this predicament.

The primary driver of this complication is faulty food habits, often promoted by parents who themselves indulge in consuming gluten and calorie-rich junk food and resorting to irregular consumption of food. Additionally, a sedentary lifestyle, a ubiquitous feature of the family environment, is adding insult to injury because youngsters are rarely seen exerting themselves physically, making them accumulate calories, and hence fat, turning them obese.

This physical condition is making little ones vulnerable to poor physiological and mental health. While excessive weight at young age impedes efficient metabolic function, leading to complications like diabetes and cardiac issues, it also impacts their self-esteem and confidence, by virtue of them becoming a butt of jokes among their peers. Several studies conducted on such young individuals highlight an alarming fact that obesity makes young minds slow learners and isolated, besides predisposing them to ailments generally affecting adults.

Surmounting this challenge is possible provided mothers and fathers take the onus of this critical task: they should abandon unhealthy food, and ensure that they share at least one meal with their wards. This will encourage the latter to switch to healthy meals. Moreover, if grown-ups devote some time to exercise and outdoor sports, their progeny will follow their footsteps, and develop a robust health that sans corpulence.  

In hindsight, consumption of fatty food coupled with lack of physical activity is turning children obese, and jeopardizing their wellness. Therefore, families must don the mantle by embracing prudent practices: including healthy food and exercise their daily regimes.