Art has served an important role since ages. However, many feel that the government should not fund this, in order to support a minority interest. Do you agree or disagree?

Art has served an important role since ages. However, many feel that the government should not fund this, in order to support a minority interest. Do you agree or disagree?

A school of thought is quite critical about state augmenting art, in all its manifestations, monetarily because it fails to appeal to a large part of demographics; thus, it must stop. However, I fail to subscribe to this notion, and favour continuation of such support.  

Those  skeptical of this policy found their argument on the belief that the works of art only tend to interest the elite, whereas the majority find themselves struggling to make their ends meet, and hence, have little time for such luxuries. Moreover, there are several areas like education, food, and health, among others, that need urgent attention. Therefore, in the wake of such circumstances, it is quite warranted to halt such extravagance. 

On the contrary, this perception would be consequential if it were true; artistic expression, in the form of music, poetry, and so forth, has always had a dominating influence on the human psyche. Where on one hand, it has rendered a medium for entertainment, rejuvenation and unwinding, besides exhibiting emotions. On the other hand, it is a potent tool of stimulating creativity, which is extensively used to foster resourcefulness even among doctors, engineers and researchers, to name a few. 

Similarly, this is the only carrier that has always helped one generation to transmit the knowledge of traditions, customs and rituals, to their successors, thereby perpetuating culture, and guaranteeing its survival. To corroborate, literature, drama, songs, and poems act as huge repositories of cultural heritage, and connect communities with their ancestors effectively, and let them educate their progeny about their past. 

In hindsight, the objections raised by the detractors of the art should be overlooked, and policy-makers must lay every possible assistance at the disposal of all art domains, for these help mankind overcome challenges and protect ancestral knowledge.   

A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness and trust no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness and trust no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

As per a common perception, the contemporary definition of gauging persona has witnessed a paradigm shift: it banks on affluence, and influence one enjoys in society, rather than conventional traits underpinned by ethical and moralistic beliefs. However, I fail to completely concur with this notion: while such an attitude does exist, most instances mandate assessing the age-old traits: reliability and virtuous attributes.    

To start with, monetary prosperity, and respect one wields at societal level, have gained precedence for some. The advent of social media and consumerist attitudes has led many to believe that opulent lifestyles augmented by expensive automobiles, branded clothes and huge houses fitted with state-of-the-art facilities, are the true parameters of ascertaining accomplishments of individuals. However, these beliefs tend to be short lived; most, especially youngsters, are able to steer clear of such ideology, subsequently realizing that these attributes fail to translate into noble personalities. 

Having said that, conventional values: generosity, reliability, empathy, and so forth, have endured eternally, for these are considered critical for social and personal interactions. When one engages with their loved ones, relatives, friends and acquaintances, among others, they are expected to be honest; be in possession of the ability to comprehend the emotional state of others; and reliably respond to circumstances. This can be corroborated by citing the example of individuals enjoying popularity among families, friends and neighbors, regardless of their economic backgrounds, and being sought for advice and assistance. Likewise, businesses while seeking partners, and hiring workers, evaluate the track-record to  establish their credibility, something defined by honesty and ethical working styles.  

To conclude, disputes aside, except a minority that harbors such thought process, most have always relied on time-tested traits of dependability, truthfulness, and empathetic approach- this defines true personality - and shall continue to do so.   

Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

In a fast paced world, change in the external environment has posed some serious concerns towards children. They can be often seen struggling, doing hard work to gain knowledge and competitive edge over others. As a result, most of them are overburdened with responsibilities and stress which must need to be addressed and worked upon.

Nowadays, one of the most common distressing issue contributing to the ever rising pressure on children is the lack of institutional opportunities. It can be widely observed that more than ever, children have to compete with each other to hold the privilege of having higher education and sometimes need to migrate to different places.

Moreover, family expectations has also pushed child into pressurising situations wherein they are expected to gain knowledge, try to get success as early as possible or be the best among the next door children.In addition, commercials also appeals to children and influence their mental ability to a great extent, e.g. they see the latest models of cell phones and other items with their peers and want to buy them. When they are unable to do so, they get stressed and feel discomfort.

Easing the mounting pressure on juveniles is possible if formal tuition must encourage healthy competition and offer necessary courses, such that children should feel safe and secure about their future and do not have to migrate. Furthermore, parents should provide adequate space to their children to grow naturally rather than comparing with others and pressurising them to study. Also, they must promote sportsmanship spirit such that they respect their peers.

In conclusion, children must be shielded from the mounting pressure exercised from academic, social and other institutions. An integrated strategy between the parent, and institutions should be in place in order to provide them with a stable and stress free environment.

The astronomical sales being achieved by the consumer companies depicts the power of advertisement, rather than the need of the society where they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The astronomical sales being achieved by the consumer companies depicts the power of advertisement, rather than the need of the society where they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 

Of late, it has been observed that companies are increasing their sales of products through advertisements, while others dissent with this notion. In my view, publicity has little to do with increment in business turnovers.  

It is assumed that businesses use celebrities to endorse their goods through ads, by virtue of which, many procure the promoted material by seeing their idols, and follow the latest trends on the face value without realizing their real need. For instance, youngsters purchase gadgets of latest technology and discard their old ones despite being in ideal condition. However, such instances are confined to a limited section of impulsive buyers.  

Similarly, some also suggest discounts publicized, such as buy two get one free, attract many and create a niche for products. Furthermore, specific ads are made to target certain segments of the society, and the agenda in those commercials connect the viewers emotionally and morally. For example, insurance agencies focus on the life of family members after the death of bread earners, and hence, achieve humongous sales.

Nevertheless, the real factors driving sales include the spurt in population, the demand for the merchandise is directly proportional to the number of buyers, and the current circumstances have precipitated  (led to) humongous requirements for manufacturing. Additionally, with the advent of technology, devices are constantly incorporated with updated features, promoting a habit to use and throw, a chance to flaunt prized possessions. This culture is partially attributed to banks that provide loans in minimal EMIs, and in this scenario, advertising has little role to play except informing consumers. 

In hindsight, advertisements play an insignificant role in boosting sales, instead, demographic rise, constant innovations, consumerist behavior, and affordability predominantly determine the consumer needs, leaving publicizing out of the picture. 

 

Children often find it difficult to study mathematics and philosophy. Some people think that these subjects should be optional in the study curriculum. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.

Children often find it difficult to study mathematics and philosophy. Some people think that these subjects should be optional in the study curriculum. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.

Subjects  like mathematics and philosophy are considered as critical for gaining entry into the professional courses. However, some believe that learners should enjoy the liberty opting to not explore these, while others voice dissent against this proposal. This matter needs to be critically analysed.

Many  commentators profess that pursuing these topics help develop logical thinking and quantitative reasoning among young minds, and make them intellectually strong in the long run for later endeavors, and thus, these should remain compulsory. For example, in India, maths plays a crucial role in every  competitive exam, and  those excelling in this domain, earn better opportunities.

Similarly, philosophy aids in fostering dexterity in traits quality required  to make decisions logically  and creatively, helping surmount even steepest of the challenges. That is the reason those in commanding positions in armed forces are made vulnerable to philosophy since this can equip them with qualities required to assess, analyze circumstances and discover remedies, plan strategies using their resourcefulness.  

Nevertheless, some question the former view and argue that those having little inclination for these disciplines, should be spared,  for they might suffer from anxiety, and stress, as they have to carry extra burden to study them. Moreover, such compulsion creates delay in attaining success, and are more prone to exposing learners to ailments such as depression, obesity, diabetes, and so forth. A  survey conducted in the UK states that school goers find calculations difficult, precipitating panic attacks and poor performance during examinations.

To conclude, although teaching math and philosophy is essential to develop mental abilities, those failing in learning these can be given a little leverage by making them an optional component of the curriculum so that academic progress is not hindered and learning becomes enjoyable.  

Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases, or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children?

Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases, or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children?

There is a fierce debate aligned with the issue about preventing several ailments through the mandatory use of vaccines. While some lend full-blooded support to this proposal, others protest and feel that it should be the prerogative of families.

The government is responsible to provide resources such as colleges, schools, jobs, hospitals, housing schemes, and to name a few, to its countrymen. Likewise, treatment and cure come to their priority. Hence, like other schemes, parents must vaccinate their wards from childhood to eradicate several diseases, and give a healthy and disease-free life to them under the supervision of the law, otherwise they might skip on some, or other pretext. 

Moreover, by implementing this policy they would set the precedents to work hand in hand with the policy makers to achieve the desired goal of a  healthy nation. According to the report published in Hindustan Times, India, that covid-19 immunization was made mandatory for entering at all the workplaces, schools, and colleges, which has not only saved many lives but also protected the future generations from ill-effects of infectious virus-borne diseases.

Nevertheless, such decisions, whether they would like to inject their little ones, or not, should be on parents. Furthermore, many medicines work on trial bases with no evidence of providing an appropriate care and cure to juveniles. For instance, in the USA, many young people who had taken vaccination for Hepatitis B in the age of 3-5 reported blood pressure fluctuations and weakening their liver function and henceforth, this situation created distrust among many.

To conclude, although mothers  and fathers choose the best facilities for their wards, by trusting their policy makers, they afford a safe life to their young ones,and such a move will help ensure unconditional compliance with the inoculation process.  

Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.

Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.

In recent years, a growing number of youngsters have begun emulating lifestyles, attitudes, and behaviours of well-known figures from sports and the film industry. This social phenomenon carries both benefits and drawbacks, depending largely on how these public personalities are interpreted and followed.

On the effulgent  side, noted public figures can serve as a formidable source of motivation. Many young athletes look up to Cristiano Ronaldo not only for his exceptional talent but also for his discipline, perseverance, and strong work ethic. When young people attempt to mirror such qualities—by training consistently, setting clear goals, and maintaining healthy habits, they often develop resilience and self-confidence. As per study carried out by eminent human behaviorists, observing professional sports personalities encourages school goers to adopt a structured exercise routine during their formative years, helping them improve their physical strength and mental focus, and  set goals and strive for excellence.

However, in some cases, such a propensity can prove to be detrimental: some young individuals concentrate mainly on outward appearances, luxurious  lifestyles, or dramatic behaviour frequently portrayed in films. The entertainment industry often presents an unrealistic image of success and happiness, which can lead to distorted expectations. There have been examples, wherein the youth have been coaxed into spending excessive amounts of money on fashionable clothes and expensive gadgets in an attempt to ape famous actors. As a result, they are often observed facing financial pressure and emotional stress.

In conclusion, disputes aside,  barring sporadic instances where the upcoming generation tends to go astray while mimicking their idols and lose their sense of direction, most tend to draw inspiration for improvement in their persona and habits, and attempt to achieve benchmarks established by popular figures. 

Some people believe that earning a high salary is the most important factor when choosing an employer, while others think that a positive working environment is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some people believe that earning a high salary is the most important factor when choosing an employer, while others think that a positive working environment is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.  Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In contemporary society, people prioritize different factors while choosing to join employment. While some argue that a generous remuneration  is the most important consideration, others believe that  supportive and healthy workplace culture holds greater significance. Both perspectives have merit ,and I will examine them before offering my  own views.

On the one hand, a substantial income is often a  primary motivator. Appropriate monetary resources allow one to support themselves and their families, maintain a comfortable lifestyle, and plan for the future. Many graduates, for instance, prefer engaging in multinational corporations because they offer attractive pay packages, even if the workload is demanding. Furthermore, earning a competitive salary reflects social standing, acknowledgement for qualifications and expertise, and boosting self esteem, and  eventually, confidence.

On the other hand, for some, prioritizing a healthy and motivating work culture is more important than financial incentives, as it enables individuals to grow professionally while maintaining a balanced and fulfilling life. Undeniably, an encouraging and well-structured work setting significantly influences long term job satisfaction. Friendly colleagues, understanding managers, and a structured organizational culture enhance motivation, creativity, and mental well being. Employees in stressful, or toxic workplaces, may experience burnout, regardless of sky-high emoluments, whereas those in collaborative and congenial environments are often more productive, committed, and experience fulfillment. For example, personnel working with companies offering  mentoring programs, flexible schedules, or opportunities for team collaboration, churn out excellent performance and stay loyal for long periods.

In conclusion, even though high remuneration provides security and recognition, it is the quality of the work environment that truly shapes enduring  fulfillment. A nurturing, collaborative, and well-managed workplace cultivates motivation, resilience, and a sense of purpose, ultimately, defining lasting professional and personal achievements.

Many companies now use artificial intelligence to make hiring decisions. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Many companies now use artificial intelligence to make hiring decisions. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 

Benefits 

• Time efficient 
• Cuts down on the time required to arrange for interviews, this can also be activated at a short notice 
• Mitigates traveling times required for interviewers and interviewees 
• Allow quick hiring 
•  Money efficient 
• Saves money of both the employers and the applicants, otherwise spent on arranging things and traveling to the venue 
• Lesser workload for administration 
• Candidates can appear for interviews in a relaxed environment 
• May help overcome bias 
• Can create records and prevent repetitive tasks 
• Make a better match of requirements and qualifications 

Drawbacks 

• There is great likelihood of qualified candidates being rejected
• Judging body language and facial expression is not possible for machines 
• Cannot judge emotional intelligence and resourcefulness of applicants 
• Lack human touch 
• Technical glitches and data theft 

Although the advent of automation has made choosing the correct candidate for jobs convenient, there are some drawbacks of this system which cannot be overlooked. Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate whether the pros of this system exceed its cons.

Undeniably,  the self-driven system of talent acquisition has helped make things uncomplicated for recruiters as they are spared of the daunting tasks of planning interviews, arranging resources and venues, and creating a synchronization between different departments to allow a smooth flow of events. This up-to-date medium can perform all functions single-handedly without needing a special space for evaluating job applicants.  

Nevertheless, despite this state-of-the art mechanism offering unprecedented convenience, its utility is extremely limited to selecting people for jobs that are straightforward; it is likely to misjudge the depth of experience of aspirants by virtue of operating on the basis of certain algorithms. To corroborate, surgeons and pilots can only be assessed on the basis of their successful surgeries and flying hours respectively with negligible errors and flaws.

Moreover, this medium is incapable of accurately examining soft and interpersonal skills because even the most advanced systems lack emotional intelligence, and thus, can never evaluate ability to communicate effectively, mental resilience, and persuasive acumen, the critical traits of capable professionals today. Several large hotel chains had to embrace the traditional system of interviewing prospective workers after the AI-assisted recruitment system failed to hire qualified people. These aspects assertively highlight that rewards offered by automated recruiting systems are scanty, while there are detriments galore.  

In hindsight, notwithstanding the benefits  like the ease of operations, the AI-driven hiring process is severely restricted to selecting employees for simple tasks, by virtue of its inability to determine critical traits of job applicants; thus it should be used restrictively.  

Many people believe that big business in addition to generating profits should be involved in and responsible for the social life of the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people believe that big business in addition to generating profits should be involved in and responsible for the social life of the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Yes,

• This approach will make their customers trust them which directly profits them in business.
• All businesses use resources whether it is people, or natural resources, infrastructure and fuels etc. should work on the sustainable approach to save the environment.
• Education, well-being, work life balance approach will encourage businesses to give their employees stress free zones for workers to work efficiently.

Many people argue that businesses should not only focus on generating profits but also they should be responsible for the social well-being and bring sustainability to save the environment. This essay will discuss both the views and come to a plausible conclusion.

To commence with, it is a significant responsibility of the large businesses to also focus on the communities well-being where they are working and operating. Almost every business uses the natural resources for production, public infrastructure, transport and work force around them, and they should give them back. For example, several organizations such as Tata in India, support initiatives in education and health care systems for not only their workers but also for those residing in communities around their factories across Indian cities. 

Moreover, by virtue of spoiling the environment, prosperous commercial entities must take the onus of improving the surroundings and to help create sustainable surroundings. For instance, many businesses have adopted a green approach by initiating tree plantation drives, recycling industrial waste, and cleaning the water bodies and locales to alleviate the impact of their activities. This can help them build and reinforce their reputation and engender client trust. 

However, some believe expecting large organizations to involve themselves in social activities is unjustified. Their view is founded on the fact that these large businesses are already paying taxes: income, profit, environment and social security, among others, and contribute to the government and community initiatives. Likewise, they are also providing employment to many and supporting them. Thus, such demands are unwarranted.   

To conclude, even though large businesses are already contributing to the society by paying taxes, I believe their responsibility is beyond profits, they should also participate in community wellness and promote sustainable environmental approach.

“Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer?

“Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer? 

It is often argued that the inability to accomplish goals is a reflection of lack of strong resolve. I strongly disagree with this notion, as success is influenced by several factors beyond desires. 

The majority of people tend to equate setbacks with the amount of effort a person puts into a particular pursuit. There is a common belief that if  one is resolute to attain something, they will rarely fail. For instance, it has often been observed in schools and at the workplace, a successful person is always perceived as being the one obsessed with goals, and is prepared to go an extra mile to overcome objectives, but the ones, despite investing equal efforts, fail to achieve positive outcomes due to lack of drive. Such pre-set notions, even if misplaced,  reinforce the belief that those failing, are lagging the determination to win. 

However, although the former view might hold some substance,  it is not valid in most cases;  there are several factors which influence the outcomes: triumph or loss. In reality, desires might be one aspect influencing accomplishments, but largely circumstances play a determinant role. It has often been  observed that many worthy of success struggle to find it because of absence of resources, timing, financial constraints and various other similar obstacles which contribute towards one being able to realize their ambition, or falling short of goals.  

In conclusion, I believe that there are several factors which decide success, or lack of it,  apart from the yearning to lodge victory. There can be numerous aspects that underpin the outcomes of endeavors, and thus, it is unfair to state that lack of desire causes one to miss the rewards of efforts: the success. 

Moreover, sometimes in a highly competitive world, failure can be attributed to luck. For example, many students preparing for competitive exams such as UPSC face a lot of rejection before they meet success simply because the questions they encounter might not be within their means to respond to perfectly, but at others they easily solve the problems presented in the question papers.  

The Internet contains lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The Internet contains lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Undoubtedly, the internet is regarded as a powerful source of imparting humongous information, but also blamed for serving misleading inputs. I will critically analyze this notion and share a plausible conclusion in upcoming paragraphs.

Many  argue that content published online, by virtue of absence of  stringent rules and regulations to review and control the quality of what is being presented, is not reliable as anyone can create their channels on social media and post whatever they want, regardless whether they have the expertise or not, resulting in users being wrongly informed. To corroborate, recently a video went viral on social media for treating the skin disorder melasma and blemishes, with 1 million views on it. Many complained of itching, rashes and extreme redness over their face after applying that home remedy. Even though the video was removed from all the portals, it ended up causing extreme trouble. 

Nevertheless, those quashing the allegations argue that reliable data is presented on the websites of governments, universities, and healthcare establishments, to name a few, but most of those browsing intend log on to any random portal in search of something not asking them about their details, and also allow them free access, leading them to sites that have been designed to deceive users. For example, Ieltsonline, a website where millions of students prepare for the English exam and attempt the mock tests, simply requires some personal details, but most avoid furnishing those and choose to opt for portals allowing them to stay anonymous, and are misguided in the process. 

To conclude, I fail to concur with this perception since although the online platform is plagued by presence of inauthentic material, it is minuscule in comparison to verified details, and it is carelessness of users that causes them troubles. 

Politicians are more responsible for the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Politicians are more responsible for the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some believe that policymakers should be more concerned towards the protection and conservation of the ecology, while others argue that citizens should also don the mantle. I partially agree with this idea, as although the former plays a major role in negotiating this pressing task, it cannot be achieved  without the support of the latter. 

Many believe that law makers have been elected, and vested with powers to formulate  policies to protect the planet, and render hospitable surroundings to the populace, and thus, it is their obligation to sustain livable conditions. Moreover, they enjoy jurisdiction and the resources to support such long term initiatives, something out of bounds for common people. They can deploy laws to regulate activities and functions of businesses and households that can disrupt ecological balance. To corroborate, stringent emissions norms have been successfully used by regimes across the world that have led to decline in release of pollutants from the industry and domestic sector.

However, governments alone cannot be made to bear this burden, citizens must also play their part; they are the ultimate root cause behind the deterioration of the environment. Hence, it becomes their responsibility to act prudently to undo the harm they have done to the planet. In addition, if they choose to take ownership of their surroundings and act prudently: conduct cleanliness and tree plantation drives, and so forth, in their residential areas; and create awareness while inspiring others through their actions, the upcoming generation will incorporate sustainable ways of life as a ritual, nipping the evil its bud.  

In conclusion, despite the state boasting of power to frame policies, in my perspective erecting safeguards to buttress the ecological vitality is a joint responsibility and must be borne by everyone, regardless of whether ruling or being ruled. 

Crime is a problem all over the world. Some believe that crime prevention will make no difference, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Crime is a problem all over the world. Some believe that crime prevention will make no difference, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

Illegal endeavors have always remained a major concern globally, and some see  little hope in measures meant to halt these, while others are quite optimistic in these preventive policies. This essay will discuss both notions profoundly, and conclude with my opinion. 

Some social behaviorists believe that deterrents aimed at eradicating unlawful undertaking are bound to fail. They argue that, despite the presence of laws and policies, infringements continue to rise with each passing day, for these stem from social and psychological factors that cannot be addressed only by making stringent laws. Unless social and economic disparities are diluted, it is going to be impossible to prevent perpetrators from resorting to deviant ways.  

On the other hand, another section of society argues that a strong legal framework, including stringent punitive provision, acts as a powerful tool to dissuade antisocial undertakings, discouraging individuals from engaging in instances of breaking laws, out of the fear of punishment. When preventative methods, like  increased surveillance, are clearly defined and consistently enforced, potential offenders are more likely to think twice before committing illegal acts: none are keen to be taken away from active life, or be slapped with a capital punishment, often awarded in extreme cases. To corroborate, the UAE follows a zero tolerance policy for thwarting unlawful activities, and awards strictest penalties; consequently, this country has the lowest rate of crimes.    

In conclusion, while some believe that criminal activities will continue to plague society in spite of steps taken to curtail these, I strongly support the opposing view because there have been several instances, wherein tools used to mitigate incidence of crime have proven their worth: these instill a sense of fear of consequences among potential offenders,  and contribute to the smooth functioning of society. 

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a large number of toys? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a large number of toys? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In the contemporary era, parents tend to purchase a large number of toys for their children to keep them engaged and busy. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits of this notion.

To begin with, parents buying plenty of toys for their children because of their busy lifestyles carries a perceived benefit: these playing gadgets compensate for the absence of the elders during the day, due to their hectic work schedules, keeping the latter busy and engaged, and not feeling abandoned. While this may help the child temporarily escape the boredom, it cannot replace the emotional support and attention required from parents.

Furthermore, although toys can play an important role in the overall development of youngsters, having plenty of them can spoil them. When tender minds are surrounded by surfeit playthings, they tend to become less appreciative and more demanding, which can later become a behavioural pattern. In addition, this can lead to isolation, turning them introverted. 

Similarly, this arrangement can also lead to self-centred behaviour and diminish the habit of sharing from a very young age. Down the line, these traits can engender major problems for them in adulthood: they are likely to grow up as apathetic individuals, incapable of contributing to social causes and the environment. Above all, they may inculcate the habit of taking things for granted, and as adults, they, as per eminent child behaviorists, find themselves struggling with managing their monetary affairs. 

In conclusion, although providing children with a large number of toys may keep them occupied and support the development of creative and analytical skills, it can majorly precipitate unfavorable consequences. Excessive reliance on toys may reduce physical activity and social interaction, and often persuading juveniles to seek emotional comfort in toys rather than their parents. 

‘For all children, the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write.’ How far do you agree with this suggestion? How important is it for a child to learn to play a musical instrument, in your view?

‘For all children, the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write.’ How far do you agree with this suggestion? How important is it for a child to learn to play a musical instrument, in your view?

In contemporary times, some people say that it is essential for youngsters to learn to play music, as much as they focus on academics.  The following paragraphs will delve deeper into this perspective, by further outlining the necessity to learn a musical instrument.  

On the one hand, learning to operate a musical device can significantly contribute to holistic development. It has been observed that children who engage with music tend to inculcate discipline, concentration, and problem solving skills right from a young age. Additionally, this learning also enhances creativity and communication abilities by enabling youngsters to portray their feelings through a different medium. As per studies, it has been seen that the musical ability  greatly benefits growing minds, especially those  with disabilities to communicate much more effectively making it a great choice for them to communicate and vent their pent-up emotions. Furthermore, learning an instrument  can also help pupils with skill development, particularly those who may not excel in academics. 

On the other hand, literacy is far more essential in everyday life. Without the foundation of this essential acumen in contemporary times, one can significantly be excluded from everyday tasks. Moreover, being literate significantly influences future careers, making it indispensable in an increasingly competitive world. As per various studies, it is observed that individuals who are literate tend to secure stable jobs than those who have exceptional skills in music or any other artform, as literacy forms the backbone of communication and effective learning. 

In conclusion, I believe that academics form the foundation of all life skills and literacy cannot be replaced by additional skill sets or hobbies, even though learning musical instruments can benefit pupils with their overall comprehensive development and can prove to be rewarding for children with special needs. 

In recent years, there has been a significant decline in the diversity of plant and animal species across numerous countries. What are the potential causes of this issue? How can we mitigate it?

In recent years, there has been a significant decline in the diversity of plant and animal species across numerous countries. What are the potential causes of this issue? How can we mitigate it?

Of late,  a significant decline in biodiversity has been observed world over. This can be attributed to myriad reasons: human endeavors, making it imperative to discover remedies to preserve this ecologically critical factor. 

The primary cause of shrinking range of flora and fauna is the loss of habitat caused by deforestation. Diminishing forest cover prompted by urban, industrial, and agricultural expansion, is pushing numerous species into oblivion: with some becoming extinct. Incrementing population has resulted in speeding up industrialisation, posing an immense pressure on the ecosystem. Similarly, illegal hunting and exploitation of flora are adding to complications: animals are killed for their body parts, and trees are cut for their valuable produce like sandalwood.   

Moreover, the things are exacerbated by pollution engendered by industrial waste and effluents  causing soil enervation and destruction of marine and land-based habitats. Moreover, pollution has resulted in global warming, greatly contributing to extreme weather conditions and abrupt climate shifts, making it hard for these organisms to survive in such harsh conditions. 

This catastrophic trend can be countered using a variety of prudent methods at micro and macro levels. Governments should create sanctuaries to preserve green and natural habitats. Additionally, strict laws should be implemented to curtail unlawful activities: poaching, and perpetrators should be penalised severely. Furthermore, sustainable development should be promoted through campaigns and encouraging everyone to become responsible citizens. Likewise, waste produced by manufacturing units should be thoroughly monitored, and industry should be stipulated  to comply with environmental norms and install and upgrade waste treatment facilities and technology. These coherent steps can help avert inevitable disaster.   

In conclusion, the alarming decline in biodiversity is driven by increasing industrialisation and global warming, and  mankind is the primary culprit. However, judicious measures and initiatives can help protect and restore versatile habitats.   

Some people say that cooking food at home is a waste of time. They claim that good restaurants are better and can make modern living easier and less stressful. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some people say that cooking food at home is a waste of time. They claim that good restaurants are better and can make modern living easier and less stressful. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Agree 

• *Good eateries offer meals that are balanced
• This saves time for other essential tasks
• A rich variety that one can enjoy, something    

Disagree 

• Meals prepared at home are healthy, use fresh ingredients and hygienic 
• They are done carefully since love is main ingredient 
• Build bonds 
• Helps preserve traditions the native gastronomy 
• It does not upset budgets 

Eating out instead of preparing meals at home is becoming ubiquitous, and synonymous with  the contemporary lifestyles, but nonetheless, it is hard to discount the latter; home-cook alternatives  enjoy superiority due to incomparable benefits and offer a credible option for the long run.

Those vouching for dining out suggest that this endeavour makes life uncomplicated, and renders a much required relief to tired to the bone people who are spared of struggling with the daunting task of cooking from scratch, and later cleaning up. To corroborate, the working professionals, especially the  young generation,  must consistently subject themselves to the struggle of fulfilling their obligations, even when telecommuting within deadlines, making it imperative to devote longer than usual time to their work. This leaves them with little energy to cook, and thus, their resort to visiting eateries to douse their hunger.

Nevertheless, despite eating at food joints looking appealing and home-cooked meals pales in comparison, the family-prepared nourishment can afford, one cannot access it anywhere else. The lip-smacking delicacies served in restaurants emphasize on satisfying the taste buds, and completely disregard the nutritional value of ingredients, whereas home-prepared options strike a balance between the both. To exemplify, even the eminent chefs rarely dine at hotels, and rather prefer to enjoy meals at home. Similarly, homemade food is also an economical option: it costs a tiny fraction of what one would spend outside to have an appetizing meal. Many prone to ordering meals from eateries complain facing financial troubles due to overspending.   

In hindsight, outside meals help one circumvent the labour involved in making meals at home, and earn a relaxation, the effort put in kitchens act as a catalyst to wellness, and a bulwark against budgetary disruptions, making it critical rather than being a futile undertaking.

When asked to choose between a life without work and working most of the time, people would always choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

When asked to choose between a life without work and working most of the time, people would always choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, it is commonly perceived when given a choice, most would opt for a life without professional engagement. I disagree with the notion, as I believe that people are much more workaholic than what they used to be. 

A majority are more work-oriented than before, as stable jobs give purpose to their lives, and they feel motivated, and none wants to be plagued by a feeling of worthlessness, something that can affect their mental wellness. For example, many studies observe that those unemployed for long term, are afflicted by depression, and struggle with social isolation. Hence, to avoid such consequences, they keep themselves involved  in some kind of occupation, in turn keeping them content in the longer run. 

Moreover, another factor outrightly debunking this assumption is the rising number of educated individuals, especially females, across a cross-section of skills in diverse fields, giving rise to a generation of workaholics. This has invigorated professional ambitions, persuading investment of ample time in undertakings to guarantee acknowledgement and advancement, making one feel persuaded to consistently strive for their goals, leaving little time for disengagement from their work, or imagine staying away from it.  

Similarly, the deeper penetration of  educational facilities has encouraged many to engender and pursue their goals, and they relentlessly chase those without even needing a break. As per a study by MIT, with education - both primary and advanced - becoming affordable, a growing number, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds, are  gaining qualifications in disparate trades appealing to them, and are enthusiastically chasing their dream careers than ever before.  

In conclusion, I strongly believe that people nowadays are more willing to work rather than staying idle. This is not because of the monetary fulfillments but because of the resulting contentment and social respect working offers. 

The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The idea of installing a global governing body, instead of having separate establishments administering their own countries, has long been debated. While such a system might have some merits, I strongly believe that the drawbacks clearly outstrip the former. 

Advocates of this arrangement argue that having a unified regime for the whole world can help resolve numerous global issues, and help develop harmony and respect among diverse cultures.  Additionally, a majority of  international conflicts arise due to the hunger of capturing territorial rights of the others, but engendering this system would outrightly eradicate  cross-border disputes.  For instance, a major portion of the budgets of every country is allocated to strengthen defense systems, to safeguard their borders from potential threats from the neighbouring countries. 

In contrast, many believe that such a set-up can prove to be disastrous, rather than a positive development. This could lead to the government acting arbitrarily at their own whims and fancies, thereby neglecting the actual issues influencing localized circumstances, causing chaos rather than bringing clarity. Additionally, it would undermine the true essence of democracy and would prove to be regressive, by paving the way for authoritarian rules. For instance, in many countries, authoritarian regimes have failed to establish social harmony, rather they have instilled fear and have taken control,  whereas democratic settings extend absolute freedom in almost all walks of lives.  These two different ways of lives would prove to be compatible and thus result in conflicts of interest causing disorder.   

In conclusion, this proposal fails to emanate optimism, as the shortfalls are much more disastrous which cannot be overlooked. The concept of uniform global government does not sit well in a fragmented world, wherein some are placed as democracies, while others are autocratic: the root of all conflicts.  

Many old buildings are protected by law and are part of a nation's history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Many old buildings are protected by law and are part of a nation's history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

In contemporary times, many believe that it is essential to preserve historical edifices as they are a part of national pride, whereas some believe they should be demolished. This essay shall delve deeper into both the perspective and conclude with my opinion. 

Advocates for preserving such structures argue that it is important to maintain them, as these ancient constructions represent rich ancestral legacy and help preserve long standing history, culture and traditions.  These help one identify the core roots, lifestyle and values that have been embedded in the history. Moreover, it also allows the natives, especially youngsters to stay connected to their roots and values. Additionally,  such locations and premises attract tourism, assisting  in generating huge revenue, thereby  contributing to the economy. For example, India with its wealth of monuments, reflecting richness, versatility and diversity, offer an enriching and enticing experience to tourists from across the world, and the majority of tourism comprises visitors craving to indulge with these ancient buildings. 

In contrast, many people believe that such preservation initiatives by the government are a waste of the contributions of taxpayers. They further argue that there are long-standing issues of the citizens that should be addressed and paid heed to, rather than focusing on saving structures that are already in a deteriorating state. Furthermore, rapid population growth and limited residential space are major concerns in modern society, and many old buildings could be demolished to make way for new infrastructure that would better serve humanity. 

In conclusion, I believe that ancient structures carry history and cannot be completely scrapped. It is also true that increasing population raises concerns with regards to accommodation. Hence, structures that could not be maintained should ideally be demolished, whereas the ones in good condition should continue to be maintained. 

Some people believe that universities should focus on providing theoretical knowledge, while others think they should prepare students with practical skills needed in the workplace. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that universities should focus on providing theoretical knowledge, while others think they should prepare students with practical skills needed in the workplace. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 

Some advocate that varsities should focus on imparting content that helps foster academic skills, while others contend that learners must be equipped with vocational and practical skills to help them become job-ready. In my view, universities must strike a balance between both approaches, as each is essential for the all-round development. 

Theoretical knowledge forms the cornerstone for a deeper understanding of the disciplines pupils intend to follow. In addition, such a curriculum helps garner critical and analytical thinking skills, allowing individuals to tackle complex problems more effectively. This is particularly important in professions such as medicine, engineering and law, where a thorough understanding of underlying concepts is essential before practical application can take place. For instance, medical students must first study human anatomy and biological sciences in detail before they are able to diagnose and treat patients competently. 

However, occupational acumen is as essential to academic knowhow, since this enables pupils to apply academic concepts effectively in professional settings. Modern workplace environments are often demanding and require employees to possess practical abilities, such as time management, teamwork and multitasking. Such skills allow individuals to perform efficiently, and adapt to challenges facing them in a work environment, with adroitness. For instance, in a high-pressure professional atmosphere, personnel demonstrating quick decision-making and adaptability are often valued more highly, as these qualities reflect their competence in functioning effectively under demanding circumstances. As a result, such individuals are more likely to gain a competitive advantage/leverage/edge in the workplace. 

In conclusion, I believe that in the contemporary fast-paced world, universities should prepare learners to foster deeper understanding of both the academic concepts, as well as occupational finesse to allow them to function efficiently and earn success in their professional endeavors.