Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

The upbringing of juveniles is a critical aspect of societal growth, and opinions vary on whether it is better managed solely by mothers and fathers, or in the extended family environment, including uncles, aunts and grandparents. Both approaches have merits and challenges, depending on circumstances.

Advocates of extended family involvement emphasize the benefits of diverse guidance and emotional security. Having multiple relatives ensures children receive varied perspectives, enhancing their problem solving abilities and social awareness. For example, grandparents often impart knowledge of culture and values, enriching the understanding of traditions. In addition, shared caregiving responsibilities mitigates stress on parents, enabling them to focus on  work or personal development without neglecting their offspring.  This collaborative effort also strengthens family bonds, providing a solid foundation for young minds to thrive emotionally. 

Conversely, critics argue that too much interference from relatives can lead to conflicting parenting styles. Variance in opinions: discipline, education and lifestyle choices, may create confusion for them and strain family dynamics. For instance, leniency from one member might undermine the structured rules set by parents, potentially encouraging indiscipline. Moreover, reliance on joint family perspectives can occasionally hinder young ones from developing a close, authoritative connection with their primary caregivers, something essential for enriching trust and accountability. When parents take an active role in raising their little ones, they cultivate deep meaningful connections, help foster an environment where youngsters feel comfortable about sharing their problems without fear of criticism, and ensure safeguarding privacy of the young ones.

To recapitulate, a middle ground appears most effective. A harmonious blend of parental authority and occasional involvement for extended family members allows youngsters to thrive under diverse mentorship while maintaining clear boundaries. This approach ensures consistency in upbringing while leveraging the strengths of a broader family network.

In conclusion, while both methods offer unique advantages, combining the strength of parental leadership with the wisdom and support of the relatives provides the optimal environment for nurturing well-rounded, confident individuals prepared to face future challenges.

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence will increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence will increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The death sentence has long been a contentious issue, with arguments for and against its necessity in maintaining societal order and preventing criminal endeavors of violent nature. Some argue that it is critical for deterring such offenses, while others question its relevance.  

Supporters of the death penalty emphasize its deterrent value. They believe that the existence of such an irreversible penalty discourages potential offenders from committing grave offenses like murder and terrorism. For example, countries such as Saudi Arabia, which has enforced strict statutes of putting perpetrators of brutal acts to death, report relatively low rates of illegal acts of savagery. Advocates also argue that it ensures justice by delivering the ultimate punishment to partakers of the most heinous acts, thereby providing consolation to victim families. Furthermore, they highlight its role in reinforcing public confidence in the legal system by ensuring severe consequences for grave violations.

Opponents, however, challenge the efficacy of this arrangement, in mitigating acts of barbarity. Studies from countries like Canada and Germany, which have abolished this penalty, show no significant increase in unlawful undertakings that cause physical harm. Critics argue that other factors, unless education and socioeconomic development proliferate to every section of society, such deviant behaviour cannot be curbed.  Similarly, not every offender breaks a certain law deliberately because inherent animal tendency makes humans incapable of controlling themselves. Therefore, unless such individuals are trained to control their emotions, no severity of punishment can incite fear among offenders. 

In conclusion, while condemning to the gallows for unlawful undertakings intending harm to victims is viewed as necessary for ensuring public safety, some see it as an outdated and flawed practice. Its effectiveness as a deterrent remains inconclusive. I feel that such awards must be handed over discreetly where antisocial elements are irredeemable. 

Some people feel that children are overprotected nowadays. They say this leads to negative consequences

Some people feel that children are overprotected nowadays. They say this leads to negative consequences

Children, today, are cosseted, and this can lead to complications later in life:  overprotection, negatively affecting their ability to become independent and handle real-world situations.

One major issue is that excessive protection is preventing juveniles from learning to cope with challenges. When one constantly monitors their wards, in an effort to protect them from discomfort and  failures, the latter miss out on valuable life lessons. For example, a child who is never allowed to make mistakes may grow up scared of taking risks, and unable, to manage stress. Such young individuals are often seen lacking confidence and problem-solving skills, something essential for a successful adulthood.

Moreover, helicopter parenting can delay the development of certain critical traits: fostering independent perspective that assists in broadening the horizons. When someone is closely followed by their elders in formative years, they tend to start relying on the experiences of others, rarely seeing the things from their own point of view, impeding their ability to become creative and  resourceful. To corroborate,several studies by human behaviorists have shown that those  allowed some unregulated room that sans overprotective approach, tend to become innovative and more mature, by virtue of learning things as per their convenience.   

However, those supporting such an arrangement suggest that this kind of child rearing is helping people, especially those surviving in nuclear family settings, to safeguard their progeny from risks the outer world poses on young minds: cyberbullying and criminals. This system has come in handy in times when crimes against unattended juveniles is on the rise. 

In conclusion, while protecting children is natural and often necessary, doing it excessively can limit their personal growth. A balanced approach, wherein children are guided but also allowed to make choices, take risks, and learn from debacles.   

Children need guidance and boundaries to stay safe. However, the problem arises when this becomes controlling or constant. Instead of removing all risks, adults should teach children how to handle them in age-appropriate ways.

Some suggest that safeguarding the natural surroundings of the destination locations is the onus of those undertaking journeys for tourism. However, this view can be challenged on various grounds by virtue of not being pragmatic.

Some people believe that tourists should be responsible for protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?

Agree 

• They are the root cause of environmental complications

• littering 

• Abuse of resources 

• Disrupt wildlife behavior 

• If they embraced responsible practices,the evil will be nipped in its bud 

• Choosing hotels and services providers that comply with environmental norms 

• Carrying eco-friendly 

Disagree 

• Tourists are using services created and afforded by hosts and their governments 

• Policymakers of host nations should take the onus 

• Tourists are helping raise revenues which should be used responsibly for creating sustainable tourism 

• Locals involved in offering services and products should ensure eco-friendly policies 

Some suggest that safeguarding the natural surroundings of the destination locations is the onus of those undertaking journeys for tourism. However, this view can be challenged on various grounds by virtue of not being pragmatic. 

Those lobbying for this proposal propound that it is the leisure travelers who behave irresponsibly and erratically by littering, disposing plastic refuse and resorting to resource abuse: water and electricity. Therefore, it is assumed that making them accountable for the imbroglio they are causing will help nip the evil in its bud, but such harsh steps are likely to produce undesirable outcomes: people will be deterred from visiting such societies, impacting tourism and its associated sectors unfavorably. 

Ones undertaking voyages to tourist destinations must completely rely on the locals for every need - boarding and lodging, and traveling and other activities- and consume whatever facility or resource is laid at their disposal; they cannot act independently in alien surroundings. Hence, expecting them to espouse (embrace) the burden of protecting ecology is unwarranted (unjustified). For instance, a European visitor traveling to Asia is likely to be oblivious of local environmental circumstances, and cannot act on their own to protect the planet.

Similarly, the tourism sector is helping generate colossal revenues, through various channels, for natives and policy makers of the host society - direct beneficiaries of this industry, making it imperative for them to devote a part of resources earned for the cause of insulating the environment from the impact of tourist activity. To corroborate, Japan allocates some portion of its annual budget for the upkeep of tourist locations and surroundings.

Overall, this view cannot be concurred with under any circumstances as this will only mean shifting the blame instead of acting concretely: host should don the mantle (take responsibility) of detaching tourism and the environment.  

 

Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

 Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

There is a fierce debate going on over the issue that sportspersons are earning more than any important fields such as the armed forces, engineers, scientists and medical professionals and so forth. Many are in favour of this difference, while a school of thought opposes this disparity. The following paragraphs shall analyze both aspects and share a plausible outcome.

To commence with, It is believed by many that players represent the identity of the nation as they make their country proud by winning in international sports events. It encourages a large population, especially youngsters, to start playing sports, or at least exercise to sustain well being, helping establish a sporting culture. For example, as per statistics released by Indira Gandhi Sports Institute, New Delhi, ever since Neeraj Goyat in Athletics won a gold medal in the Olympics 2022, there has been a rise by fifteen percent in individual participation among the Indian youth, which has encouraged local sporting authorities to organize more athletics events. Furthermore, these players dedicate years of hard work and discipline, and are exposed to the risk of disabling injuries, or going out of form, which could end their careers abruptly; therefore, they deserve to earn higher incomes.

However, some resent this and feel that some important professionals like doctors, engineers and scientists are working in the favour of society; by ensuring well-being of society, creating healthy environment, or developing technology and discovering new inventions, or researches for betterment of humankind, but sports personnel only entertain public, and still they are making billions, but the former do not get enough in lieu of their contributions. Thus, this gap must be bridged.  

In hindsight, the  outstanding players should be rewarded as they represent their nation and their years of hard work and discipline should not be ignored. However, governments should work to raise the pay of those who are working in crucial sectors, mitigating the income disparity.  

Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation. Do you agree or disagree?

Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a general perception emerging among those believing that umpteen concerns of the world could be surmounted with help of international teamwork. I agree with this proposal, which shall be discussed in the following paragraphs.

To start with, a lobby strongly asserts that the challenges such as hunger, which is augmenting malnutrition index, especially among children, could be tackled if the developed countries donate, or sell the spare produce, to recipient societies. This will nip the evil in its bud; as a result, those famishing will have food on their platters. For example, every year Japan donates the harvest of corn with Thailand, in order to help undernourished juveniles.

Moreover, many feel that if nations open borders for tourism, it will render a plinth to progress, aiding economies by creating employment for millions and business worth billions. This is to say, when travelling for leisure is promoted, it will help create jobs in diverse economic sectors, sometimes, not even related to tourism; likewise, generate revenues for organizations engaged in disparate commercial domains and regimes of host countries, aiding in amassing monetary resources for daily and emergencies. 

Similarly, a group propounds that rich nations should share environmental research and its results. These findings will assist in overcoming several woes: deforestation, pollution, garbage disposal, and many more, not just at a local but at the global level. To corroborate, a recent finding on waste management by researchers in New Zealand, was shared with Asian countries, helping engender an elaborate framework for proper disposal of trash.

Hence, it can be safely asserted that with international joint efforts by: sharing information, food, and permitting leisure travel, will surely pave a way in discovering plausible mechanisms to enable the global community to negotiate numerous universal concerns.

We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits?

We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits?

Undoubtedly, in the contemporary world, information technology has become an integral part of life, and every sphere of life has been captured by its diverse tools. In this essay, I will shed some light on future use of this innovation and also,  discuss the positive and negative aspects of its overwhelming influence.   

To start with, if observed closely automation has the capacity to do wonders in making their life more convenient. The time is not far when computational power will be utilized for driving the cars, doing the hazardous work where people are unable to reach, taking up combat roles in wars and guarding borders, helping in household chores, managing front and backend operations in offices, and replacing customer care representatives,  to name a few.

Excessive reliance  on these devices is worth praising because of numerous benefits afforded by these. This idea has made life easier by negotiating tedious office work efficiently, and with precision.  One command is enough to deliver errorless outcomes. Similarly, giving interviews and working from remote locations has made it easier for professionals. Above all, people can now connect with their friends and families living in distant locations. 

 Having said that, the skeptics profess that this can make humans vulnerable to losing and unlearning their skills and abilities, exposing them to crisis if this equipment becomes unavailable due to some reason. Similarly,  unemployment is another peril facing society because AI-assisted systems are likely to replace people in almost all the jobs, resulting in unemployment, and eventually, impoverishment. .  

 To sum up, the use of these modern intelligent gizmos is going to penetrate further in various domains,  and the merits of this trend exceed its pitfalls  even though caution must  be exercised to offset the drawbacks resulting out from reliance on these machines. 

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

There is  an ongoing debate about experimenting on animals  because some believe that is illegal  and animals are also living beings, but some disagree. The following paragraphs will discuss this matter and share plausible conclusions and explore other  ways of this matter .

To start with, experimenting on animals it’s very harmful and painful for them. For example, as per PETA, many animals meet painful death every single year, they are injected with chemicals and substances  every day, sometimes twice or thrice in a day, and are locked in glass boxes with a dim light because this is part of their experiment. Consequently, thousands perish [die] because of these harmful experiments.  

However, experimenting on animals is not bad because they test only those species who are in huge numbers, like  monkeys, rats, dogs, guinea pigs, and so on. Every year, these animals are killed in huge numbers because they are considered their pests, and many are shot and given poison by farmers and city authorities. A study conducted by University of New South Wales, compared the number of animals killed by  farmers and those killed by  laboratories, and found that 10,000 to 1. 

Similarly,  this system is very important because there is no other way of testing medicines and surgical procedures. Several medicines tested on animals like polio,covid, and many more, have been helping to  protect human lives from disease. Moreover, many surgical procedures like liver transplant,heart transplant, brain surgery have been tested on monkeys and pigs, and then used on humans.

In conclusion, these tests are justified because there are no other ways of testing, and also the animals being used are otherwise killed in big numbers.  this should continue new technologies found that can replace it.

Some people think that climate change could have a negative effect on business. Others think that climate change could create more business opportunities. Discuss both views and your own opinions.

Some people think that climate change could have a negative effect on business. Others think that climate change could create more business opportunities. Discuss both views and your own opinions.

It is often perceived by many that altering weather patterns is likely to deliver devastating impact on commercial activities, while some are optimistic about the outcome of this phenomenon. I will analyse both views and draw a plausible conclusion. 

Those fearing severe ramification of shifts in climatic behavior feel that businesses in many regions could face droughts and flooding due to the unpredictable weather phenomenon due to unannounced prolonged dry spells and excessive precipitation, especially those involved in agriculture will be the hardest hit. Other industries such as fishing will also encounter loss of marine life as rise in temperature will also erode the coral reefs. To cite, the WHO has in its report stated that regions with temperatures greater than 45 degrees Celsius, or higher will face severe water shortages, and 70% farmers, and the companies involved in processing food, in those areas will likely lose their livelihood. 

On the flip side,  some see abundant opportunities in this evolving scenario  as the need will arise to move away from fossil fuels and look for alternative energy sources, like Solar energy, and this would prove to be rewarding for those manufacturing equipment, and possessing expertise, for such technologies. Simultaneously, many other industries like automobiles will be moving toward fully electric vehicles instead of combustion engines, creating new business venues. Moreover, other businesses will have to adapt to the newer conditions. For example, agriculture will be moving towards vertical farming and mimic the environmental conditions to grow fruits and vegetables throughout the year.

To conclude, undeniably, despite climate change creating possibilities for commercial endeavors, this is bound to prove to be a recipe for disaster since it might fetch windfall profits for some, but it will bring miseries for a majority, leaving them high and dry.  

Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true.

Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true.

Holding a university degree is the only way to attain triumph, is a common perception that evokes mixed responses: while some support this, others reject it. The following paragraphs shall profoundly delve into this matter, and share a logical conclusion.

To start with, a lobby opines that graduating from a varsity is critical: it is a pre-qualification criteria for many renowned companies and legal firms who seek those completing university courses. Besides this, these institutions integrate industrial placements, capstone projects  and internships, in their curriculum, allowing students to gain academic and practical knowledge during their course span. Also, learners are exposed to myriads of methods of research writing, which help in enhancing their critical thinking and resourcefulness. A survey conducted by Howard University revealed that eighty percent university graduates have outstanding skills in conducting research and in analyzing data, something in great demand today. 

Nevertheless, others profess that varsity degrees are not the only way to attain objectives, there are other methods as well, to earn excellence and  realize desires: online courses, crash courses, diploma and certification programmes, that target trade-specific acumen, offered by colleges and specialist institutions. Apart from this, if one has intuitive skills, no formal degrees are required to harness those to obtain pinnacle.  An article “qualifications and entrepreneurs” was published in Forbes, wherein top twenty successful businessmen like Bill Gates, were interviewed, and it was revealed that they did not hold any university degrees, yet they achieved colossally by relying on their innate traits, experience and consistent efforts.

In hindsight, disputes aside, in contemporary times, pursuing studies at university is far more important than relying on expertise and seasoning. The structure of varsity programmes helps brush up and foster dexterity, that allows making inroads into premier employment giving organizations.  

In some countries, it is believed that crime among young people is increasing. What do you think are the reasons for this trend? What types of punishment or approaches are most suitable for young offenders? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In some countries, it is believed that crime among young people is increasing. What do you think are the reasons for this trend? What types of punishment or approaches are most suitable for young offenders?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Reasons 

• Economic factors: lack of jobs and impoverishment 

• Social factor: peer pressure and advent of social media,and the situation is exacerbated by lack of proper counseling  

• Lack of parental monitorings and guidance 

Suitable punitive measures 

• Engaging the young perpetrators in restoring the damage caused to places or assets 

• Reformation and redemption through rehabilitation 

• Educational support

• Community initiatives should be run to involve youngsters in constructive activities  

• Warnings and retention

This surging incidence of unlawful endeavors involving young individuals has become a pressing concern across the world, making it imperative to delve into attributes driving this phenomenon, and discovering probable remedies to stem this trend. 

The most prominent factor driving this tendency is a deterioration in familial, and social values and circumstances which has made the young generation lose its sense of direction, and stop distinguishing between right or wrong. Perpetrators, as young as those in their teens, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds, are reportedly found engaging in activities such as mugging, robbing,  vandalizing public property, and so forth, in all urban centres on the globe, as has been reported by the Washington post. 

Likewise,  another factor underpinning the propensity to break laws amongst youngsters is abject poverty, and accompanying unemployment, forcing young people to resort to deviant ways to earn livelihood and survive. To corroborate, as per WHO, nearly ninety percent of pickpocketing and snatching in cities like London and New York, to name a few, can be ascribed to the jobless poor youth, unable to earn lawfully. 

This social malady can be cured effectively provided families, community, and lawmakers join hands, to afford counseling, alternative skills training, and community services and activities, to the delinquent young. Moreover, selective punitive measures such as detention in correction facilities that san hardened criminals can also help curtail this development. For example, Singapore Police has successfully reformed numerous young offenders by sending them to rehabilitation schools and offering them occupational training. 

To conclude, most young unlawful elements embrace anti-social ways of life owing to absence of appropriate enlightenment about righteousness, resources for survival and jobs. However, concerted efforts by every responsible component of society can help mitigate this complication, and reform the youth.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 A fierce debate is raging whether mitigating income disparity can lead to a happier society. Some subscribe to this, while others dissent. I will critically analyse this notion and share a plausible conclusion.

 To start with, blurring the wealth gap between the elite and the impoverished will allow everyone access to essential amenities: health care, housing, and food, to survive, where some are either ors completely deprived of these services, or they are dependent on others. Moreover, all population sectors will be treated equally and they will also respect each other, resulting in harmony and peace. This will also reduce the crime rate as people get constrained to commit crime due the disproportionate appropriation of money,  and  lack of basic necessities. 

 Having said that, those skeptical about this approach assert that erasing such dissimilarity is not the only way to engineer a cheerful social environment. There are other aspects as well to concentrate on: education, mental health, personal freedom, and cultural values, to name a few. Moreover, this approach will cause more disgruntlement among those who are laborious and they are consistent in their efforts, resulting in capital flight from the country.  Likewise, there are countries with uneven resource distribution, that have been able to create social bonhomie by focusing on affording access to essential services: health and quality education, to allow the populace to become self-reliant and autonomous, and capable of earning their daily bread and also care for their health.  

 

To capitulate, I do not agree with this notion as alleviating uneven wealth dispersion is not a panacea for ensuring a conducive social environment; such cosseting will produce a generation of complacent individuals while discouraging their hard-working counterparts. Rather, the focus should be on guaranteeing civil liberties and egalitarian access to facilities. 

Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 A common perception that schools/institutions are for making children responsible towards society rather than focusing on their personal growth, evokes mixed responses, while some support this, others reject it. The following paragraphs shall profoundly delve into this matter and share a logical conclusion.

To start with, a lobby opines that the only motive of the educational institutions is to make juveniles responsible only for society. Schools have curriculums that include moral education, which teach students about the basic moral values of a civilized person in society such as helping people, the concept of sharing is caring and giving back to society. Apart from this, it is considered that when wards go to schools, they meet other classmates, they start learning with them which directly instills the sense of belongingness in them. They pick up many good habits, which ultimately help them in becoming good human beings. For example, an interview was conducted with youngsters, wherein some situational based questions were asked, shockingly eighty five percent of people’s answers revealed that schools are the foundation for making them civilized in society.

Nevertheless, other lobby profess that schools also play an  important role in grooming individual personalities as they prepare them for their upcoming life by making them participate in cultural activities and sports, speaking and performing on stage, which help in making them self-confident and fearless. Moreover, nowadays schools are also offering personality development classes, wherein they provide tailored classes as per the requirement of each individual.

 To sum up, I opine that indeed, children always learn basic etiquettes from schools such as teamwork, helping others, and so on, but do not forget they also help them in grooming individually when it comes to their skills, completions.

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?                

Today, one can explore the internet to study or gain knowledge, while in yesteryears they had  to peruse books and paper.  This scenario has its own benefits and problems, but whether the former eclipses the latter is a matter that needs a profound analysis.   

Data being available online has its own advantages, like at one click one can get information: searching for a place to go, looking for upcoming events,  deriving study material and many more. This helps one manage their day-to-day routine and works differently for different people. Furthermore, it helps students to learn and study easily: they can find information online conveniently without needing to carry or browse through heavy paper-based material, saving them time and effort.  

Similarly, this arrangement is extremely ecologically sustainable: the  advent of the internet-based platforms and portals has ushered in a paper-less era, wherein every organization is shifting from physical material to virtual one. Consequently,  the felling of trees for manufacturing paper has mitigated to a great extent, allowing rewilding of denuded areas. To corroborate, as per the European Environment Agency, countries like Switzerland, Germany  and France have been able to restore forests due to fall in demand for paper in recent years.   

However, one does encounter certain challenges while relying on the information available online. It is many times not authentic - by virtue of being unsolicited - and thus, often misleading and unreliable. Likewise, there are chances of redundant inputs - that might be too old to be relevant - being supplied to the information seekers, exposing them to unwarranted situations. 

To conclude, storing and deriving information from online sources can be beneficial and does afford greater merits than pitfalls by virtue of being a convenient and environmentally friendly method: its utility can be optimized provided one uses it prudently.  

In some countries the use of bicycles is decreasing as people prefer other means of transport. Why is this happening? What can be done to encourage the public to use bicycles more?

In some countries the use of bicycles is decreasing as people prefer other means of transport. Why is this happening? What can be done to encourage the public to use bicycles more?

Nowadays, disenchantment  from cycling is becoming a ubiquitous phenomenon, owing to the growing popularity of modern means of commuting. This trend seems to stem from umpteen factors, and there are some plausible steps which could make this medium more common. 

To start with, one of the primary reasons is lack of infrastructure. This is to say, there is a dearth of  designated roads, or guided tracks for pedaling, which not only incites fear of accidents, but also dissuades many from opting for this medium. Moreover, cycles are exorbitantly expensive, making these unaffordable for a majority, especially for those hailing from middle and lower income  groups; consequently, a growing number are abandoning this humble mode. To corroborate, a recent survey revealed that many are disappointed by the rapidly incrementing prices, and hence, causing a disenchantment from these vehicles among them.  

Having said that, a lobby strongly suggests that governments should don the mantle by creating separate lanes for cyclists. This will alleviate the chances of road mishaps, and motivate many to travel using this medium. Additionally, manufacturers should reduce the prices, or offer special discounts, thereby making these affordable for everyone. For example, in Japan, The Hero Automotive has introduced offers for professionals, coaxing  many to buy cycles at lower price, and encouraging them to pedal to fulfill their travelling needs. Moreover, employers could also contribute to creating an interest among their personnel to cycle to work by affording monetary inducements, in the form of bonuses, and other benefits.  

In conclusion, inadequate safety on roads for cyclists and high prices are the chief drivers of this disinterest among commuters,  and the viable ways to promote this mode of transit is reducing the cost of bicycles, and constructing proper roads for their movement.

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important, while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important, while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Nowadays, youngsters are often influenced by their peer groups, some say that it is important and offers several benefits, while others enumerate detriments, making it imperative to assess whether the former is outstripped by the latter. 

To begin with, individuals are often influenced by their peers and at times try to follow their footsteps. This practice offers umpteen advantages: one gets a reality check and they step out of their own dreamy world. In a recent published article by John Bravo, professor at University Of Melbourne, states that the influence of acquaintances works like a wonder for those procrastinating at their work at school, office, home.

Furthermore, it boosts confidence and forces one to put more effort, resulting in better performance. In Bluebells International School, Delhi, the pupils scoring less in the formal institution are made to sit with the ones excelling: this practice has had a favorable impact on the former; their scores start to climb from very next term exams.

On the contrary, some believe this practice carries numerous  drawbacks as one tends to follow wrong precedents. A recent study, conducted by the government of South Africa, shows that more than 45% of college students start to drink alcohol, smoke weed as they are influenced by their seniors and this habit stays with them life long. Additionally, this creates stress and anxiety among young individuals, hampering their mental and physical well being. More than 65% of young people suffer from stress and headache in their school due to this phenomenon.

In conclusion, peer pressure is considered to be fruitful; disadvantages of this engagement fail to eclipse rewards fetched by such influence even though it is necessary to counsel the youth to ensure that they do not go astray.   

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

The most prominent challenge in migrating to a new country is the linguistic barrier that poses immense complications in various manifestations. Some accord with this notion, while others dissent. 

A school of thought assumes that settling in an alien environment without the knowledge of local language affords several impediments: immigrants find it hard to settle down; they are unable to interact with peers, and cannot share their thoughts with friends, teachers and employers, adversely impacting their performance. Also, this endeavor makes it difficult to find a job; lack of compatibility with native tongues is usually deemed unwelcoming by the corporates. For instance, Quebec in Canada only accepts job applications from the aspirants who embrace the French language because the majority of the population is of French descent. 

Moreover, this hurdle stimulates the imbroglio that impedes them from enjoying their basic needs like grocery shopping. To exemplify, a survey conducted in Russia revealed that sixty percent of the locals did not comprehend the worldwide accepted language: English, and promoted their language,  which  proved to be a stumbling block for new entrants to Russia, depriving them of opportunities to explore the new surroundings freely. 

Nevertheless, the former view holds little relevance today when technological advancement has ushered a paradigm shift: facilities, like google translator, help interpret any language into the host dialect. These afford comfort and convenience to immigrants. Similarly, systems like google maps and GPS help people to navigate directions seamlessly, eliminating dependence on external intervention. Additionally,  those relocating to new environments enthusiastically prepare and accept different challenges that come their way. 

To conclude, undeniably, there are several problems while migrating to societies using unfamiliar dialects, but technological evolution has aided in transcending difficulties posed by such endeavors, easing up the process of adapting to new environments.

Developing countries should be encouraged to implement high tariffs to grow their local industries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ielts essay

Developing countries should be encouraged to implement high tariffs to grow their local industries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ielts essay

In recent years, imposing high tariffs on imported goods and services has become a common suggestion for underdeveloped nations, to protect the domestic industries. While this arrangement seems feasible, governments must act prudently to circumvent its adverse impact.  

To start with, economists assert that levying high tariffs can help the infant factories survive in a competitive world; they lack capital, raw material, cheap labour and a proper scale to do the business. Likewise, it also encourages customers to buy local products; products, sourced from other parts of the world, will become more expensive, resulting in building home-grown brands. For example, India levied tariffs on automotive a few years ago, precipitating setting up its own manufacturing unit of Hyundai and Maruti, now the top selling brands for vehicles. In addition, it also generates employment opportunities, boosting the economy of the country.

Nevertheless, the skepticals term it as a recipe for disaster; other countries will also retaliate by deploying similar charges, leading to trade wars and strained international relations. For example, USA and Canada tariffs attack is one example of retaliation, where both countries ended up putting their own taxes, resulting in a downfall of imports, and promoting international tensions. Apart from that, if local businesses are always protected by this approach, they may lose motivation to do better, provide excellent quality, and to innovate. Also, there are more chances to increase the prices of local products due to lack of variety.

In hindsight, I think there is nothing bad in imposing levies on merchandise, brought from other nations, to protect native companies as it can help eradicate unemployment and bring wealth to the country, but regimes should be cautious while applying such a policy as it might adversely impact the financial growth in the long run.

It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
or,  
It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree 

• Finishing education before raising a family has a profound impact on future life: it can smoothen the things and allow one to focus on career and family

• Financial stability and independence: stable employment and lack of dependence on others for completion education     

• Emotional maturity that allows one to act prudently and handle complications related to marital life effectively  

Disagree 

• Early companionship can help each other grow and support 

• One does not have to worry about gaining professional success to settle in life

• If family support is there 

• This may help in raising family at appropriate time, before women face pregnancy-related complications

As per the common perception of contemporary times, entering into marriage before finishing the education is an unwise move, for it is likely to impede professional and personal growth. I largely concur with this notion since one must be through with their academic obligations to ensure long-term stability.

Marrying ahead of the culmination of studies and gaining employment can make one vulnerable to disruptions in attempts to successfully accomplish educational and professional objectives. This can distract individuals from pursuing college or university whole-heartedly since one, especially women, is likely to be overwhelmed by familial obligations - negotiating household chores, or caring for children, leaving them with little time to focus on  engaging effectively with academic pursuits. Consequently, they are likely to be deprived of getting jobs that promise monetary and professional progress. For instance, as per Daily Mirror, a majority of successful professionals admit that despite being in a relationship, they delayed fulfillment(consummation) promise to wed before obtaining relevant degrees and suitable employment. 

Similarly, although some might say that married couples can support each other emotionally, this is a misplaced notion/belief/supposition; one needs to be mentally mature and have emotional resilience to attend success in marital life. This can be achieved only after the completion of academic innings and settling in gainful employment because this can afford necessary exposure and adequate monetary resources to support family, and overrule any feeling of regret. To corroborate, as per ONS, Great Britain, couples settling in marriage after gaining adequate qualifications and good jobs experience  negligible divorce rates. 

In hindsight, I vehemently opine that committing to marital relationships post-culmination of education and obtaining suitable jobs is a prudent choice: this allows one to ensure their academic, occupational and familial success in the long run.