Nowadays, more people move away from their friends and families for work. Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?

Nowadays, more people move away from their friends and families for work. Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?

These days, people are becoming more and more inclined towards migrating alone to other locations in search of better lifestyle and work opportunities. This phenomenon can prove to be rewarding but it poses its own challenges. 

Generally, migrating to another city, or country, in search of better career opportunities, fetches chances to build successful and better paid careers one may be seeking, but unable to access back home, owing to dearth of appropriate opportunities, or intense competition. Consequently, individuals might face restrictions in career progression, and earnings, thereby inhibiting their potential and desires.  For instance, it has been seen that several accomplished professionals, specializing across a cross-section of  skills, admit that such relocation to large cities like New York, or countries like Canada, helped them attain their professional dreams, besides allowing them to earn sumptuously. 

Furthermore, higher compensation not only offers stability but it also brings independence to an individual. When someone sends back money home, it brings them immense joy as they tend to  render better facilities to their kin. To illustrate, many communities in Asia and  Africa have earned their prosperity through remittances sent by their earning family members from other cities or countries. 

However, the only potential drawback of migration is that individuals might initially feel alienated in an unfamiliar environment, making them prone to homesickness, and temporarily affecting them mentally; nevertheless, it is often observed that such feelings are transient, and eventually fade away with time when one starts to adapt and socialise. 

In conclusion, migrating to a different city or country, affords more merits than demerits: it exposes individuals to significant career opportunities, helping augment their overall lifestyles, and the  challenge one may face is being overwhelmed by the longing to be with loved ones, despite being ephemeral.   

Some people think parents should read or tell stories to their children, others say it is not important and can be replaced by watching TV and movies instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think parents should read or tell stories to their children, others say it is not important and can be replaced by watching TV and movies instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The debate over whether one should narrate tales to their wards, or whether this practice can be effectively replaced by TV and movies, has been ongoing. Both perspectives have justified points, and the choice often depends on individual family circumstances and beliefs.

Many believe that mothers and fathers should indulge in the age-old ritual of delivering legends and fables to their little one because of the deep emotional and cognitive benefits it offers. This fosters a strong bond between the two generations, as it promotes active engagement, interaction, and sharing of emotions. Similarly, this does not only improve the vocabulary and linguistic skills of tender minds but also develop their imagination; they tend to listen to their parents more attentively and also ask questions sometimes. Many admit that this has helped their young ones to learn to comprehend and use language more effectively since such narrations take place in a completely informal environment that sans inhibitions.  

Nevertheless, some argue that programs presented on tv and movies serve as modern replacements for bedtime stories. In the fast-paced world of today, where people have limited time, these digital media offer convenience by acting as a potent replacement. These mediums often present graphic and audio content, which are more engaging for young minds. Additionally, educational programs telecasted can teach various life lessons, enhance cultural understanding, and introduce global perspectives. For example, shows like Sesame Street have been known to teach little ones numbers, letters, and rhymes in a more enjoyable way.

In conclusion, although modern means of entertainment  can be beneficial in certain contexts, I believe storytelling is irreplaceable: it fosters emotional connection, and trust. Thus, one should ideally balance both methods, using screen-based entertainment in moderation while prioritizing conventional methods of disseminating tales whenever possible.

Some people think that parents should pay money to encourage their children to help with housework (cleaning, cooking etc.). Others think that they should not pay money. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Some people think that parents should pay money to encourage their children to help with housework (cleaning, cooking etc.). Others think that they should not pay money. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

A great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the view whether to persuade youngsters to contribute to household chores by being compensated with monetary benefits: while some uphold this view, others believe the contrary. This essay will discuss both sides and share a viable opinion.

The proposal of persuading youngsters to contribute to household chores by using monetary benefits as a motivation has become a controversial issue, with some upholding it, others rejecting it. This essay will discuss both sides and share a viable opinion.

To start with, a lobby propounds that children learn the value of money and hard work. This is to say, when they are paid for the house work, young minds value earning money by working their fingers to the bone, leaving an enduring impact on them about such privileges not being accessible by sitting idle. For example, in Japan, to teach the importance of money, it is a custom for parents to reward their wards by completing the household tasks. 

Nevertheless, the skeptics protest and assert that such endeavors are an imperative component of family obligations, wherein everyone is expected to partake without expecting financial benefits, and thus, should not be in lieu of money. The children are a part of the family and by doing the tasks: laundry, doing dishes and much more, they are fulfilling the responsibility towards the house and family, which they will have to do on their own initiative as adults, and this system could upset the family arrangement and  environment.  

Moreover, this could have far-fetching ramifications, daughters and sons would become greedy, precipitating into situations where they might start thinking that every work will fetch them monetary resources, causing distortions in their psyche, and impeding their integration with society, where one has to often engage selflessly for the upheaval of community,  

In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, I believe that indulging in house duties is a responsibility of children and does not need any kind of monetary inducements/ stimulants in return.

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. This is having a negative impact on the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. This is having a negative impact on the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, it is undeniable that most of the time of the adults is being spent in their offices and their social circles, leaving their children unattended. They are the most vulnerable, being without care and this has a negative impact on their upbringing as they do not get enough care as required.

The young ones are not getting enough time from their parents as unlike in the past, impacting them adversely and leaving them unaware of the importance of their family traditions and culture. As the latter do not have time, they do not get enough chances of interaction with their cousins and relatives, depriving them of opportunities of familiarizing with relationships and family.

Moreover, another impact of this can be on their mental health. The negligence by mothers and fathers may result in a feeling of loneliness, thereby often causing depression. Also, youngsters may find it hard to cope with their studies as there will be no one to guide them and boost their confidence whenever required. Similarly, as they are alone, they spend time watching movies and playing video games which is not appropriate for their age because of the portrayal of mature content and violence which could influence their behavior.

However, many view this trend as favorable. They consider this helps in personal growth making youngsters independent and responsible. Children learn to make decisions based on their interaction with the outside world and not from second hand experience, or forced decisions of their parents, and also learn how to negotiate tasks and responsibilities independently.

Overall, I concur the outcomes of this phenomenon can be grave; hence, parents should take out enough time from their busy schedules to spend with their wards. They should keep a balance between their work and personal life.

Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with examples from your experience.

 Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with examples from your experience.

The debate about whether people should face penalties for the unsocial conduct of their wards, is quite heated. I believe this approach is unfair and unrealistic. Although families are central in shaping the character of youngsters, they cannot be expected to exercise control over their conduct, for the latter must bear the consequences of their own actions.

 

As young people mature, their behaviour is influenced by numerous external forces, including friends, social media, and the school environment. Even at homes despite being rendered a strong guidance and support, young ones can still make harmful or illegal choices. For instance, if they choose to cheat, lie, or engage in scuffles, it reflects more on their own judgment than on their upbringing. Thus, it is not right to hold fathers and mothers liable for actions they did not directly cause.

 

Moreover,  putting legal pressure for such matters could prove to be counterproductive. Many already struggle with financial, or emotional, stress while trying to raise their young ones properly, and holding lawfully obligated for every mistake the latter commit can discourage, rather than supporting them, exacerbating complications, which could cause chaos for already distraught families.    

 

Having said that, some do support this move, despite this view lacking in substance, and profess such a policy will precipitate a quick impact, for the fear of reprimand, fines  and levies would motivate mothers and fathers to act, and educate their offspring about righteous ways, and embracing socially acceptable behavior.  

To conclude, although parents must be legally responsible for the well being of their little ones, they should not be blamed for every wrong decision their child makes. Young minds need to take the onus and understand the consequences of their actions, rather than depending on their parents to take the call.

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss both views and include your own opinion.

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss both views and include your own opinion. 

Many opine that exploring what one,or their ancestors did in gone by days, is worthless and one should look towards the future, but there are voices of dissent, nonetheless, suggesting that this might be impractical action, and have unfavourable effects.

Many opine that ignoring the family past deprives one of several benefits. Such a practice gives an opportunity to discover the values and culture of family of concerned individuals, a miss. This could be very helpful, especially, during hiring workers, or looking for a suitable matrimonial match. A well-rooted and cultured person will prove to be an asset but not exploring the background might result in selection of a wrong person which can impair the new relationships in making. 

In addition to above, information of family background is very incumbent for learning about the genetics and heredity of an individual. This data can be very useful for medical practitioners, and researchers, for treatment, or developing remedies for lethal diseases and ailments. Nevertheless, forgoing the exhaustive investigation of family history, will make it impossible to pinpoint the source, and intensity of  afflictions, and recommend suitable medical intervention.   

Having said that, others are skeptical of this view, fear that it can have unfavorable consequences. The information extracted might be misleading; it cannot be guaranteed that the process for gathering inputs was reliable and unbiased; thus, casting a shadow on  the legitimacy of facts. On top of that,  revelations of gone by days might prove to be a traumatic experience for many, causing psychological setbacks, propelling people towards depression and anxiety. 

In hindsight, despite there being certain pitfallls attributed to this proposition, I opine that change is inevitable and it must be embraced gracefully without prejudice; therefore, it is practical to overlook the need to delve into the backgrounds.  

Nowadays many people, with families, leave their country to work abroad. Do you think the benefits of this trend outweigh the disadvantages for the families? Give your opinion and include any relevant examples

 Nowadays many people, with families, leave their country to work abroad. Do you think the benefits of this trend outweigh the disadvantages for the families? Give your opinion and include any relevant examples

. 

The proliferation of globalization has precipitated,   the rising incidence of exodus of individuals to foreign countries, especially the affluent ones, for employment, better future for kin and so on. This decision is complex, and is associated with both brighter and darker shades. .

 

To begin with, working abroad can provide families with umpteen benefits: better compensated jobs, career advancement opportunities and a higher standard of living. For example, migrants may be able to secure positions in giant companies that offer attractive salary packages, benefits and opportunities for professional growth, not easily accessible in home countries. Additionally, their wards get unprecedented exposure to diverse cultures that can enrich their education, broaden their perspective, and foster intercultural competence, preparing them for success in an increasingly globalized world.

 

However, the benefits of such propensity must be weighed against the potential pitfalls, particularly if the family gets separated from the home country, the social networking is disrupted by staying at home and individuals become more emotionally depressed. One of the most significant challenges facing such families is missing their extended network, social support and familiar surroundings that may lead to isolation, loneliness and homesickness, particularly for spouse and children, struggling to adapt to an alien environment. 

 

Expanding upon some of the other problems faced include young ones getting overwhelmingly engaged with the new exposure, they end up becoming confused, emotionally detaching from their parents, for they desire to embrace foreign lifestyles. They become more inclined towards their newfound friends, often causing arguments with parents, behavioral problems, academic difficulties, and even adjustment issues.

 

In conclusion, although there are both benefits and umpteen disadvantages, they do not exceed each other, but depend on the individual prerogative. Thus, such decisions should be carefully made, by evaluating individual and family benefits, values and aspirations.

In many countries around the world young people decide to leave their parents’ home once they finish school. They start living on their own or sharing a home with friends. Is this a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples.

 

In many countries around the world young people decide to leave their parents’ home once they finish school. They start living on their own or sharing a home with friends. Is this a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples.

It is being observed that youngsters, after completing their formal tuition, choose to be on their own. Many suggest that this afford umpteen benefits as fosters a sense of independence. However, a lobby does not align with the former view and believe that its demerits outweighs the merits.

To begin with, the view which leans towards the positive aspects of newly developing propensity believe that it makes the young individuals more responsible and independent; they do not rely on their fathers and mothers for financial support anymore. They start working, either full-time or part-time, in order to make a living. This aids in instilling confidence in them, making them capable of handling challenges, and eventually coaching them how to carry themselves around successfully. On top of that, it also afford colossal  pros to the parents as they do not have to look after their young ones and can enjoy their life after working for several years, allowing them a free life without needing to care for their wards.

On the other hand, there are few challenges that are involved in such a lifestyle. As young individuals start to live with other housemates, they might get easily influenced by them, and as there is no one to monitor them, whom they have to answer for any misconduct, many fear that they might go astray, and pick up bad habits. Moreover, such young individuals also many times become apathetic towards their parents: they stop caring for the latter, turning them into self-centered personalities, who are often a misfit for family life.  

To recapitulate, this new practice which is gaining popularity across the globe, may have some drawbacks, but its advantages outshine its disadvantages and in my opinion, it is beneficial for both parents and children.

In some places, people's lifestyles are Changing rapidly and it affects the family relationship. Do the Advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In some places, people's lifestyles are Changing rapidly and it affects the family relationship.

Do the Advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

 

IELTS ESSAY - Lifestyle changes and Family Relationship 

Quickly shifting paradigms in the way people are living today is impacting their interaction with their families. This transformation does have certain benefits and drawbacks, but do they outshine each other, is a matter worthy of a deep analysis.

Undoubtedly, switchovers in the lifestyles, often resulting in nuclear family settings, has rendered more independence to individuals. They, no more, need to be dependent on the moods and preferences of others to do something. This has, in a way, helped fetch extremely satisfying experiences for many where they are able to lead a life as per their choice and, consequently, avoid clashes.  

Having said that, despite many virtually venerating this new shift in the ways of life, it is really disheartening to see the way people struggling to cope with the challenges posed by living away from their families. The emotional connect, the bonhomie,  and the bonding seem to have gone missing, and it has been replaced with a strange sense of competition, where each one is trying to prove their superiority over their once closed ones with whom they shared feelings of endearment.

Moreover, the enstrangement is a common sight between ones who lived and shared the space, resulting in disappearance of family and social values. The hardest hit of this change are  the young ones born in the nuclear families: they are never able to familiarize themselves with their own relatives, and end up drifting away from their family identity. In the long run it is feared that this might undo the social fabric and harm the society.

Hence, I can clearly assert that the even though hard to evade, contemporary way of living has brought in more misery, for all, than promises. It is clear that if this trend continues, society will soon be populated with those apathetical to others.

It is quite common for both parents in a family to work. Sometimes this is because they need two salaries to survive whereas at other times it is their choice. What problems do you see in this situation? How does this affect the children and family life?

It is quite common for both parents in a family to work. Sometimes this is because they need two salaries to survive whereas at other times it is their choice. What problems do you see in this situation? How does this affect the children and family life?

 

IELTS ESSAY Working Parents 

Nowadays, a radical transformation in family settings is being observed where both the spouses take up employment: some out of interest, and others out of compulsion. However, this does have its own pitfalls, sometimes with severe implications for family, as well as the children.

When both, the father and the mother are employed, they are overwhelmed by their professional obligations that leaves them with little to time to devote to their families and personal realms. Such a situation has a potential to create communication gaps among the family members since the critical interaction goes missing; it is superseded by official work and duties. This makes spouses become oblivious of aspirations and expectations of each other, often turning things sour, and the biggest victims of such disturbances are the sons and daughters.

Moreover, this change is fuelling clashes among married partners: there is always an agreeable tension  between the two, as both consider their professional goals to be more critical, and hence wish to given due priority over the other. Besides this, fulfilling family obligation also draws a lot of disagreement among the two, which can sometimes turn bitter. Thus, leading to an unease in the environment of home and family.

Such a situation hits growing ones worst; their mental growth is adversely impacted. Due to continuing tussle between their mothers and fathers, young ones start feeling insecure, and  often grow up as nervous adults, who have problems forging relationships and effectively interacting with others. In many cases, children – if they remain unconcerned – in such family settings, tend to grow up as apathetical individuals.

To conclude, it can be said that even though there are certain drawbacks that the phenomena of both spouses bring in, these can be overcome by a better planning and sharing of responsibilities of family and household chores.

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay Modern Lifestyles and Kids 

Nowadays, as everybody is embracing modern living, and spending more and more time at work and leisure, children seem to be at the receiving end: they are hardly subjected to monitoring, and rarely rendered affection unlike their counterparts did in the past. I feel that this trend seems to have descended permanently and will radically impact the family system.

It is undeniable that these days, in most families, both the parents are engrossed heavily in  fulfilling their professional obligations, which takes away a major portion of their time by either keeping them confined to their office cubicles, or making them travel for work; thus, resulting in their absence from their homes and families, and robbing them of even the leisure intervals that could be otherwise devoted to their off springs.

Besides this, with the rising living costs, it has become essential for many to keep seeking ways to bolster earnings. People have to often resort to foraying into multiple occupations. This intent is accompanied by need to obtain extra education and expertise. Undertaking such an endeavor makes mothers and fathers to devote their free time – even when they are at home – to their studies. This pushes the priority of looking after the children down the ladder.

On the top of that, whatever time parents can spare, is used in meeting their social obligations. As many suggest, keeping up with the society and prevalent trends is only  possible if people stay in touch with the peer group. This makes it imperative for both the spouses to divert their attention away from their children into enhancing their social presence. 

To conclude, it can be hence be said that mothers and fathers are left with little time to spare for their children, and this is going to stay. However, this is gong to have an adverse impact on the family life.  

There is certainly a difference in thoughts, ideas and actions between children, their parents and grandparents. Why do these differences exist? Does it cause problems in your community, in your opinion? - Ielts Essay

There is certainly a difference in thoughts, ideas and actions between children, their parents and grandparents. Why do these differences exist? Does it cause problems in your community, in your opinion?

 

Ielts Essay - There is certainly a difference in thoughts

Widening and deepening rift between the generations has always intrigued social theorists.  This has never failed to fascinate many experts: they are at their wits end to find causes behind this. But, does this lead to some problems or not, is a matter worth deep introspection though I personally feel that it does.

The strongest of causes that can be attributed to this issue is the era these people were born in. Where grandfathers and grandmothers were born in perhaps mid 1900s, and mothers and fathers in mid late century, most of the juveniles are born are in the 21st century. There is a gross difference in aspirations of the past and present, due to difference in access to sources of information about surroundings and the world: older generation relied on printed material, radio and television; the children rely on internet and social media.

Moreover, other major cause of contrasting viewpoints is the way people work, this is more associate to the speed with which these three generations work. While parents and grandparents were born in an era bereft of modern gadgets: they spent hours and days working to find out solutions and completing jobs, the new generation is more dependent on the modern equipment that helps them to  negotiate work effortlessly and quickly.

This lack of agreement in opinions is surely leading to a myriad of problems: the families are falling apart and people are abandoning old ways of life since the young generation does not want to share space or even live with their elders, which is leading to elderly living  alone fending for themselves, or moving to old age homes.

Hence, viewpoints of three different genrations can never  agree with each other, which is creating several social issues, that remain insurmountable. 

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion. - Ielts Essay Model Answer 2

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion.

Ielts Essay - Family History 

 

 

 

Modern approach of investigating family history entails overlooking the past. Even though some cite practical reasons for following this strategy, there are certain shortcomings that cannot be discounted.

Ignoring analysis of past events to ascertain family history would make this exercise futile, resulting in faulty inferences. A peek into by-gone eras, families have survived through, to reveal facts about individuals is considered holistic: it accounts for origins, migration patterns and lifestyles evolving through eons. Whatever one does today, is greatly influenced by the nature of activities undertaken up their ancestors: one may be doing anything in the current scenario, their attitude towards working and responding to situations; performing certain activities; discovering solutions; and implementing strategies are directly influenced by the genetic inheritance, and forgoing it is likely to afford erroneous outcomes. 

Moreover, this may severely jeopardize health, specifically when it comes assessing inherited diseases, preventing adoption of adequate safegaurds. Evaluation of past events, often involving genetic risk assessment, aids in determining risks resulting from certain ailments: diabetes, cardiac ailments, and so on, and psychological disorders that can affect upcoming generations, helping ascertain risks and embrace necessary precautions to ensure wellness in future.  

However, the new method can help save time and resources: several modern theorists firmly find is little use squandering time and money in assessing the past mistakes in the current scenario when the surroundings and lifestyles have undergone significant transformation: education, technology and new order of society, have diluted social differences and evaporated class distinctions, heralding a new era where current circumstance and future aspirations are deemed more essential.  

Overall, I feel, disregarding family is prone to more drawbacks than benefits as it can cause inaccurate assessments about approaches and health, resulting in severe ramifications for individuals and those around them.

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion. - Ielts Essay MOdel Answer 1

When it comes to research on family history, some people prefer not to dig into the past, instead they just focus on their future. Discuss the positives and negatives of this approach and include your own opinion.

 

Ielts Essay Family Heritage 

Evaluation of family history is an extremely broad subject, and disparate approaches are deployed to attain this task even though more recently those involved in such endeavors overlook the past events and emphasize on the future. This method may be successful even though it has its own drawbacks. 

Abstaining from looking at the past is assumed to bring time and money savings: humanity has made significant progress, and transformation, over the last century in almost every walk of life, including a significant switchover even in the case of the traditional occupations, making the history earlier than the start of 20^th century quite irrelevant. Moreover, the influence of consumerist attitudes persuades shunning gaining knowledge of lifestyles of ancestors, and instead focus on what future presents.

Nevertheless, ignoring past cause serious complications by circumventing a chance to learn from past mistakes: nothing can be clearly ascertained about a family and its members. Genetic inheritance; family based values and traditions being followed; and upbringing of individuals in a family, play a paramount role in shaping the personality and thus the future of a person.

Additionally, this could have severe implications for health, in case the investigations involve establishing the extent of risks facing individuals having a track-record in families of carrying hereditary ailments: diabetes, heart ailments, strokes, and so on, to aid in deciding the nature of safeguards that need to be embraced to delay, if not completely eradicate, the probability of occurrence, and affording relief to those susceptible to some diseases.

Overall, I feel that disregarding the bygone era of families to know about their evolution, despite fetching time and money savings, has the potential of precipitating unwarranted and inaccurate outcomes, preventing deriving accurate assessment. Thus, this practice should surely include examining the gone by days.   

 

Many people believe that a member of family is more important than a friend. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Ielts Essay

Many people believe that a member of family is more important than a friend. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay - Family or Friends? 

Making comparisons between friends and family members, considering family members important than friends and vis-à-vis, has been a common practice since long. The pitch of these comparisons, and prioritizing both over each other, becomes sharper and shriller, when a family or an individual is passing through a turbulent phase.

Family members are an important part of life of any individual, as a person, born and brought up in an environment of family is trained to behave and face life in all its diverse dimensions. A child, since its birth, always looks up to its elders for love and affection, which ultimately develops into strong lifelong bonding. The parents, and brothers and sisters, fulfill the emotional and psychological needs of an individual and always stand by him or her whenever there is a need.

Apart from that, even if relations between family members are strained, they do not turn their backs at each other when the situation arises, and always come to the rescue of each other. People have experienced that they can share even their   ill feelings more openly with their family members and still keep the relations sweet and on friendly terms. For instance, people in need of moral or any kind of support, including financial, can easily bank upon their parents and siblings.

However, friends are considered to be close to heart, with whom an individual can easily share even the darkest of secrets, without fear of secret being let out to others. Pals, or buddies, as they may be called, are always there when an individual needs them, especially when a person in pain and needs a shoulder to cry on.

To conclude, I personally feel, even though friends and family are both have their distinct importance and role for an individual,  parents and siblings hold more  relevance for an individual.   

The modern family structure and roles of each member have changed in the recent years. Do you think it has a negative or a positive effect on families? Give your opinion and relevant examples. - Ielts Essay

The modern family structure and roles of each member have changed in the recent years. Do you think it has a negative or a positive effect on families? Give your opinion and relevant examples.

Ielts Essay - New Family Set-ups 

With the changing times, a paradigm shift is being observed in the family set-ups across a cross section of society. This has also resulted in switchovers, and sometimes, complete reversal of roles of family members. These modern settings are laden with both benefits and drawbacks though the former are more prominent.

The concurrent families are more of a reflection of harmonized relationships, where both the spouses have their own space to express their viewpoints, along with their likes and reservations about several matters, more freely. Husbands, especially no more don the roles of bread earners, while the wives are not confined to their homes as mere home makers. This shift has made it possible for both to appreciate each other, together with aspirations, more conspicouly: consequently, mutual respect has incremented manifolds, making it possible to mitigate differences more constructively.  

Additionally, an equal contribution is made when it comes to handling certain essential functions: earning for the family; negotiating daily chores, like cooking, shopping for groceries and other items;  and managing the rearing of the little ones. This has surprisingly mitigated instances of shifting of blames, and unpleasant clash of egos.

Having said that, these relatively modern settings have had also certain unreasonable influences despite being sporadic; the biggest casualty of such changes has been the the juveniles, who more or less, have become uncontrollable, as they take advantage of constant switchovers of roles between their mothers and fathers. There have been reports of young members misusing this arrangement to escape their studies and going astray. 

To sum up, this transformation in the family roles carries more merits, while the detriments can be surmounted if both spouses monitor and control their wards judiciously. Thus, it is a favorable evolution benefiting families and society.