Some people believe that university education should be free for everyone. Others think students should pay for their own education. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that university education should be free for everyone. Others think students should pay for their own education. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Many argue that universities must extend courses without charging any fee, while others think otherwise. This essay will critically examine both perspectives before presenting a well-reasoned conclusion.

Free university education can enhance college enrolment, thereby increasing the chances of promoting innovation, and churning out expertise to take society forward. Furthermore, it can strengthen the economy by creating a highly skilled workforce, capable of working in various strategic sectors of the economy. For instance, in Latvia, free university education has encouraged a growing number to pursue higher studies, resulting in greater participation in research and technological development. This has resulted in learners becoming inventive in critical fields such as artificial intelligence,  which has led this nation to strengthen its plan for the knowledge-based economy. 

Similarly, this policy could make higher education more accessible to all, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds, and thus, help reduce the gap between the rich and the poor, and also allow the deprived to harness their latent talent, benefitting society at large, in terms of ensuring distribution of equitable opportunities to all. Moreover, those hailing from middle and lower income groups will not have to worry about subscribing to expensive educational loans. 

Nevertheless, many believe that university goers should be accountable for paying their tuition fees; it will assist them in understanding the value of education, persuading them to be more consistent, and stay focussed on their studies. Additionally, this will also help in saving public money because only devoted learners will enroll in university courses.

To conclude, while charging tuition fees may help students realize the value of education and ease the financial burden on governments, free university education is a better approach; it  will ensure equal access to higher studies and help create a skilled workforce, benefiting the entire nation.

Some people believe that universities should focus on providing theoretical knowledge, while others think they should prepare students with practical skills needed in the workplace. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that universities should focus on providing theoretical knowledge, while others think they should prepare students with practical skills needed in the workplace. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 

Some advocate that varsities should focus on imparting content that helps foster academic skills, while others contend that learners must be equipped with vocational and practical skills to help them become job-ready. In my view, universities must strike a balance between both approaches, as each is essential for the all-round development. 

Theoretical knowledge forms the cornerstone for a deeper understanding of the disciplines pupils intend to follow. In addition, such a curriculum helps garner critical and analytical thinking skills, allowing individuals to tackle complex problems more effectively. This is particularly important in professions such as medicine, engineering and law, where a thorough understanding of underlying concepts is essential before practical application can take place. For instance, medical students must first study human anatomy and biological sciences in detail before they are able to diagnose and treat patients competently. 

However, occupational acumen is as essential to academic knowhow, since this enables pupils to apply academic concepts effectively in professional settings. Modern workplace environments are often demanding and require employees to possess practical abilities, such as time management, teamwork and multitasking. Such skills allow individuals to perform efficiently, and adapt to challenges facing them in a work environment, with adroitness. For instance, in a high-pressure professional atmosphere, personnel demonstrating quick decision-making and adaptability are often valued more highly, as these qualities reflect their competence in functioning effectively under demanding circumstances. As a result, such individuals are more likely to gain a competitive advantage/leverage/edge in the workplace. 

In conclusion, I believe that in the contemporary fast-paced world, universities should prepare learners to foster deeper understanding of both the academic concepts, as well as occupational finesse to allow them to function efficiently and earn success in their professional endeavors. 

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree

• . students should focus on other activities too as it help them to develop skills 
• . can even adapt something else as a career option rather than choosing academic 
• . other activities can help in creating a fresh environment 
• . they will learn to create a balance between extra curricular activities and studies. 

Disagree

• . as huge amount of fees are being charged by the university, and the first goal of student needs to be the academic performance, other activities can be done later and competition 

In modern times, university goers are mostly focusing on studies and most of their time is spent on improving academic performance, whereas some believe that they should spend their time in other activities too. I completely agree with this view completely and shall elucidate my views in the following paragraphs. 

 The significant development of the technology has created peer pressure, and individuals attending university programs tend to stay fully occupied in academics because the job market has become competitive, so that they can  gain rich employment opportunities like their classmates and acquaintances.  Similarly, they must bear an extremely high amount of fees, which creates a burden on their families, persuading them to stay focussed only on their studies. 

However, students need to be introduced to other activities too as it helps them to escape the mundane, and rejuvenate their minds, which can help them enhance their focus on their studies. Undeniably, programs offered in varsities are loaded with complex syllabus that involves undertaking projects, assignments and sometimes practicals, which can be mentally taxing, but partaking in cocurricular endeavors can earn them a much required healthy distraction, allowing them to unwind and refresh their minds. For instance, most globally-acknowledged universities like University of Glasgow, encourage their pupils to participate in sports, arts and other endeavors, so as to allow them to let off steam. Furthermore, this will help them to develop skills and to be free from their chaotic schedules, which can lead to broader thinking and creative mindsets. 

In hindsight, dispute aside, by analyzing both the views, being academically strong can help in building up a strong career, but taking part in extra-curricular undertakings can lead better academic outcomes, as well as foster resourcefulness. 

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

University education is considered key to success, and those studying focus completely on academic studies. However,  they should participate in other activities too, as some suggest. I completely agree with the suggestion that students also focus on extra skills.

Most students believe that they should prioritize academic studies because university courses  cost an arm and a leg, and they do not want to be distracted from studies. Nevertheless,  if they participate in other cocurricular activities, it will be beneficial for their mental health. Sometimes learners feel stressed due to studying long hours which can cause depression and other mental health problems. Thus, indulging themselves in other extra skills can help them earn a much required healthy distraction,  making them feel relaxed. 

Similarly,  they can also make friends, and create strong social ties that will help them in future. A recent study by Northern college proves that the students who are more active socially gain more opportunities as compared to those who just focus on their academic tasks because they tend to use these links to gain better work openings through these networks. Mr. Harkirat Singh, an emerging  Indian badminton player admits gaining chances to get expert coaching in this sport through his friends.  

Furthermore, participating in other endeavors develop important life skills that textbooks cannot teach such as team work and  leadership,  among others, and also improve communication skills as well as boost confidence, something extremely valuable for their future. Students joining clubs or social groups often feel connected and supported, which improves overall university experience. 

In conclusion, although academic studies require significant dedication, full time university students should also engage in other activities: involving in a variety of experiences leads to better mental health, stronger skill development, and an enjoyable and successful university journey.

Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true.

Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true.

Holding a university degree is the only way to attain triumph, is a common perception that evokes mixed responses: while some support this, others reject it. The following paragraphs shall profoundly delve into this matter, and share a logical conclusion.

To start with, a lobby opines that graduating from a varsity is critical: it is a pre-qualification criteria for many renowned companies and legal firms who seek those completing university courses. Besides this, these institutions integrate industrial placements, capstone projects  and internships, in their curriculum, allowing students to gain academic and practical knowledge during their course span. Also, learners are exposed to myriads of methods of research writing, which help in enhancing their critical thinking and resourcefulness. A survey conducted by Howard University revealed that eighty percent university graduates have outstanding skills in conducting research and in analyzing data, something in great demand today. 

Nevertheless, others profess that varsity degrees are not the only way to attain objectives, there are other methods as well, to earn excellence and  realize desires: online courses, crash courses, diploma and certification programmes, that target trade-specific acumen, offered by colleges and specialist institutions. Apart from this, if one has intuitive skills, no formal degrees are required to harness those to obtain pinnacle.  An article “qualifications and entrepreneurs” was published in Forbes, wherein top twenty successful businessmen like Bill Gates, were interviewed, and it was revealed that they did not hold any university degrees, yet they achieved colossally by relying on their innate traits, experience and consistent efforts.

In hindsight, disputes aside, in contemporary times, pursuing studies at university is far more important than relying on expertise and seasoning. The structure of varsity programmes helps brush up and foster dexterity, that allows making inroads into premier employment giving organizations.  

Over the last few years more and more students enroll in universities. This situation creates competition among individuals. Do you agree or disagree? Is it a good or a bad development?

Over the last few years more and more students enroll in universities. This situation creates competition among individuals. Do you agree or disagree? Is it a good or a bad development?

In concurrent times, university education epitomizes advanced learning that promises quick success, but also a struggle, with a growing number vying for a place in university courses, exposing aspirants to both rewards and certain pitfalls. 

With the progression, the world has seen a rise in the number of job opportunities in almost all fields: from science, technology, space, agriculture to even sports.  This has resulted in the need and demand of people taking education as the main element for growth, which as per many, only varsities can impart. Consequently, there has been a huge influx of students competing to enroll in one of such institutions. 

This rising competition and the desire to succeed in life has given rise  to new challenges. Students and even professionals - intending to enroll for a university course - might suffer due to the unwarranted pressure created by demanding requirements and prerequisites for gaining entry into varsity, foregoing  family commitments and many other issues. This is giving rise to mental trauma which, in some cases, can be fatal, but prudent counseling can help surmount this impediment effectively. 

Having said that, there are benefits galore of this phenomenon: those competing for a place in the programs offered by the varsities tend to also prepare for tougher times ahead, they are likely to become vulnerable to, when they join professional domains of their choice. Burning midnight  oil can prepare them to be meticulous and foster mental perseverance, and weather exhausting work schedules and competition in the workplace.   

To conclude, despite the race for a place in the university courses taking a toll on personal commitments and mental health of aspiring learners, this intent helps one gear up better for a successful life: the ultimate goal of every individual.    

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 A great discourse of contemporary times revolves around whether university goers should be given leverage to take up the subjects of their interests or varsities should enlighten them with profession oriented subjects like science and technology that would afford benefits in future. In this essay I shall discuss both views and share my opinion.

A lobby profoundly corroborates with the former notion by stating that rendering liberty in choosing the subjects will create passion towards studies consequently scoring good in university exams and indeed outstanding performance in jobs, as nowadays science and IT does not hold entire working sector but one can make a successful career in literature, arts, accounts and so on. On the other hand, compelling youngsters to devote their time only on subjects related to science or technology will kill their creativity, as a result they might end up with not only poor grades but also may not show compassion in the future endeavors in any field.

However, dissenters assert that youngsters get influenced easily with whatever fascinates them and with such a perplexed state of mind freedom to decide the subjects would be a regret. The universities and parents should take responsibility to make them learn what can afford them highly paid jobs . They strengthen it by mentioning that, lately the virtual world is a new trend and has a long way to go, thus knowledge of programming will always render a secure job with appealing salaries. One may not be interested in computers during college times but with future aspects such subjects assure stability.

Overall, I vehemently believe that giving a fair chance to students to express their liking for a subject would not do any harm but elders and universities should take the final decision on it.

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree 

• Apart from education, learners must also foster social skills 

• This can  also assist in fostering some other abilities: arts, sports,  or other 

• It can  help earn a break from the mundane 

Disagree 

•  University courses cost several arms and several legs, thus it should be the primary goal of learners

• This may cause disruption in studies 

A school of thought suggests that the learners studying in universities should allocate some time to cocurricular activities apart from pursuing their studies because this can help them learn some extra skills, and also unwind. I strongly support this suggestion, and shall elaborate my stand in the following paragraphs. 

Even though one might profess that since university courses cost an arm and a leg, and thus, one must remain devoted to their academic pursuits to avoid any distraction, it is extremely essential to earn a chance to escape the mundane of incessant  academic engagement. This can act as a break and also a healthy distraction, which eventually allows pupils to reinvigorate themselves, and enhance their focus on their primary task: gaining a degree. For example, all the universities in the USA mandate involvement of students in sports, arts, or other non-academic undertakings, to allow a change in routine. Consequently, most of the graduates from these varsities tend to excel academically.

Similarly, engaging in extra-curricular undertakings can also assist university goers to foster critical social skills they are going to use as soon as they complete their education. Ones studying for bachelors or masters are usually aged between 18 and 22, a juncture when they must train themselves to interact meaningfully with others in their surroundings, whether in their social circles or in the prospective professional domain. This aspect is duly acknowledged by globally-acclaimed universities, and so they regularly organise festivals and public meetings in their campuses to expose students to the outer world.

To conclude, completing a degree at university successfully is of paramount importance, exclusive focus on studies can prove to be counterproductive. Therefore, it is essential to participate in endeavors different from formal syllabus to get a respite.

Introduction 1:

It is generally observed that the university curriculum is becoming extremely complex, posing an extreme stress on learners, and to escape such taxing routine some suggest that they should also undertake cocurricular activities. I completely concur with this proposal because it can afford opportunities to learn extra skills and also help unwind.

Introduction 2:

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

University education is considered key to success, and those studying focus completely on academic studies. However,  they should participate in other activities too, as some suggest. I completely agree with the suggestion that students also focus on extra skills.

Most students believe that they should prioritize academic studies because university courses  cost an arm and a leg, and they do not want to be distracted from studies. Nevertheless,  if they participate in other cocurricular activities, it will be beneficial for their mental health. Sometimes learners feel stressed due to studying long hours which can cause depression and other mental health problems. Thus, indulging themselves in other extra skills can help them earn a much required healthy distraction,  making them feel relaxed. 

Similarly,  they can also make friends, and create strong social ties that will help them in future. A recent study by Northern college proves that the students who are more active socially gain more opportunities as compared to those who just focus on their academic tasks because they tend to use these links to gain better work openings through these networks. Mr. Harkirat Singh, an emerging  Indian badminton player admits gaining chances to get expert coaching in this sport through his friends.  

Furthermore, participating in other endeavors develop important life skills that textbooks cannot teach such as team work and  leadership,  among others, and also improve communication skills as well as boost confidence, something extremely valuable for their future. Students joining clubs or social groups often feel connected and supported, which improves overall university experience. 

In conclusion, although academic studies require significant dedication, full time university students should also engage in other activities: involving in a variety of experiences leads to better mental health, stronger skill development, and an enjoyable and successful university journey.

Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say this is no longer true.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Why university courses open up the doors to success 

• The courses are meticulously planned and supported with all necessary aids: courseware, practicals, assignments and sometimes industrial experience also 

• Universities also focus on all-round development of learners 

• These institutions also encourage learners to carry out research

• The faculty is extremely seasoned and qualified 

• Their pedagogy/ teaching methods wring out perfection from students 

• * University courses are highly acknowledged and graduates are directly recruited from campus placements 

Why others think differently 

• Today there is a focus on trade-specific knowledge that can be rendered by any institution imparting knowledge in that area and it guarantees faster placement 

• * Employers focus of skills rather than degrees 

 

Even though university education has always been revered as being one that helps accomplish life goals, of late many have been challenging this notion, giving rise to an intriguingly profound debate.

 

The  notion of university education supporting success in all realms of life later, especially professional, banks on the historical facts that gaining education in one of these institutions exposes one to meticulously designed and planned  curriculum that is imparted using a rich profusion of classroom sessions, workshops, assignments and projects, and industrial exposure, to name a few. This immensely helps learners to foster finesse in their area of expertise and afford them the best available professional openings, aiding in launching a flourishing career. 

 

Similarly, it is undeniable that the faculty in such establishments is highly accomplished, in terms of academic backgrounds and industrial seasoning, in addition to the knowledge of state-of-the-art teaching methodologies. Their pedagogy is well-known for immersing pupils in comprehensive learning that helps the latter in obtaining clinical perfection and proficiency in various fields associated with their area of study, making them capable of surmounting challenges of disparate nature, and earning them incomparable accomplishments. 

 

Nevertheless, the other section proposes that in concurrent times, the former view is losing its significance. Today, most employers seek personnel with trade-specific knowledge as most occupations are becoming specialized, and need upgrading at regular intervals such as digital marketing, aviation engineering, and so on. Therefore, businesses want the fresh recruits to be only equipped with fundamental know-how that can be obtained from any institution, undermining the usefulness of university courses. 

 

Overall, despite both the perspectives holding true in their own virtue, I opine that universities have always enjoyed a great relevance and shall continue to do so in helping one succeed.

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The learners in varsities devote a great deal of time to their study regime. However, there is a lobby that believes they should indulge themselves in some other activities along with the academics. This essay will justify the rationale behind their perspective and discuss that of others.

Many have hailed this proposal since extra-curricular activities play an imperative role in shaping the personalities of the students, by virtue of which they turn into rational adults in the life later on since these tasks assist them in their personal grooming by imparting a plethora of skills as well as values required to deal with the challenges they might encounter in their professional realms.

Furthermore, incorporation of such tasks aids the learners in taking a break from their gruelling study routines, thereby breaking the mundane which helps them to retain their interest in the academics by alleviating the immense pressure involved in incessant studying process, and encourages them to adhere to their schedules with greater enthusiasm and fervour. Besides this, such integration further helps them in discovering their hidden talents, consequently, rendering them a rich profusion of alternatives to pursue as a vocation in the future.

However, a section outrightly rejects this notion. As per this lobby, students indulge in their studies extensively, in order to achieve good grades which help them fetch higher positions at esteemed companies so involvement in other activities might prove as a distraction, owing to which they would deviate from their objectives, thereby hampering their future prospects.

Overall,  I strongly feel the idea of involving in co-curricular activities together with academics is accompanied by a wide array of positive aspects since it would escalate the performance of pupils by mitigating the stress. Also, it is indispensable for their physical and mental wellbeing.

It is being noticed that students do not study as intensively in university as they used to do in schools. What are the causes of this change? What could be done to improve the situation?

 

It is being noticed that students do not study as intensively in university as they used to do in schools. What are the causes of this change? What could be done to improve the situation?

 

Nowadays, an intriguing phenomenon is being witnessed that learners do not tend to devote as much time at universities to studies as they did during schooling. This essay shall delve into the reasons behind this change and propose some solutions. 

 

Due to the immense pressure experienced during their school days for achieving good grades to grab opportunities for higher studies in renowned colleges, learners relinquish their social connections, by virtue of which, they do not get adequate time to enjoy and have pleasures in their lives. When they get enrolled in varsity courses, they attempt to make up for the time lost in schools by indulging themselves in fun activities, thereby losing focus.

 

Similarly, a sense of freedom is another factor behind losing interest and enthusiasm for studies while going to varsities. Furthermore, tender minds get highly influenced by their peers while experiencing freedom laden college life since they do not get monitored stringently by their parents and teachers as well, and top of that, no compulsion of attendance in a plethora of institutions is also fueling this trend, as it renders them leverage to enjoy to the fullest.

 

Having said that, the panacea for this predicament, as suggested by various expert behavior theorists, could be found by the joint efforts of parents and varsities. Higher institutions should organise regular workshops to keep young minds occupied in academics, preventing pupils from straying from their focus. Moreover, creating campaigns for orientation could benefit by enlightening them about striking a balance between their education and enjoyment. Parents can contribute by allowing the wards to pursue their hobbies along with the studies since this helps them take a break from their monotonous schedules and keeps their scheduled tasks interesting.

 

To reiterate, it is true that learners lose their sense of direction after joining university courses and tend to devote less time to their academic objectives, but a little prudent approach can help mend the things and put them back on track. 

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying, however they should perform other activities too. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Why should they engage in something apart from studies 

·         Helps improve skills, talents and mental ability

·         Helps sustain a balanced and stress-free life

·         Helps in building social contacts.

 

 Why not? 

·         University courses cost several arms and several legs, thus it should be the primary goal of learners  

With the educational system and syllabus becoming sophisticated, many have started suggesting that learners engaged in regular courses, must also indulge in some extracurricular endeavors to bolster their physical and mental well being. Nevertheless, there are contrasting views too in this regard.

 

The growing demands of the modern curriculum at the varsities necessitates extra efforts from the learners which sometimes makes them dedicate long hours to their studies. This leaves them with little spare time to relax and rejuvenate, which is extremely critical for not only their health but also for their morale. Thus, they should, whenever possible, break this mundane and undertake some extra or co curricular activities to earn a much needed respite from grueling academic routines. 

 

Moreover, doing this can go a long way in restoring their enthusiasm towards the studies and also, heightening their concentration, making their university pursuits more enriching, as well as enjoyable. Similarly,  such interludes  also help university goers socialize with their peers and the outer world, which many times aid in getting a grasp of a crucial life skill: interacting with the world that is much maturer than they had encountered during their schooling, assisting in formation of broader world view. 

Nonetheless, the critics to this view deride it vehemently. This lobby asserts that the sole objective of the learners should be to attain their scholastic goals for which many are paying through their nose. Indulging in anything, unrelated to studies, might cause a distraction and take students away from their objectives, affecting their outcomes and impeding their professional progress later. 

In hindsight, I feel even though the skepticism over this suggestion is not unfounded, it is extremely important for the learners to undertake certain extracurricular activities:  this would indirectly also facilitate better academic performance.

Some people believe that there should be a gap year after finishing high school (secondary school) and before starting university. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that there should be a gap year after finishing high school (secondary school) and before starting university. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

College enrollment is a milestone that every individual desires to travel across at the earliest. There is a lobby that believes a break of one year after completing secondary education is indispensable. This essay will justify the rationale behind their perspective and discuss that of others.

A break of a year can render students an opportunity to get adequate time to ponder over their future prudently without being in a hurry. It can help them to discover the answer to the question, that is,  what to do next, thereby mitigating the intricacies involved in immediately choosing a career path right after their secondary education. Furthermore, they can avail counselling services during this gap for better guidance from the experts. 

Furthermore, after studying incessantly for fourteen years, and facing immense pressure, this respite provides them with a sigh of relief. Moreover, life at the university proves to be quite challenging for these novices. So, during this break year, they can develop some skills like communication, stress and time management, and so on, and ameliorate the existing ones as well to cope with the challenges they are likely to encounter in higher studies.  

However, some are skeptical of this practice. As per their experience,  some opting for such an arrangement have ended up suffering from anxiety disorders, depression, social phobias and so on, affecting their personalities adversely, when  they observe their peers enjoying college life. This might also lead them feeling inferior to their college going friends. Therefore, the gap year could sometimes result in severe repercussions on the psyche of the learners.

Overall, a break after secondary education has both pros and cons. However, the merits outstrip the drawbacks. Thus, I concur with the statement. Young learners should use this allowance to plan their future judiciously. From this perspective, the break after completing high school would be of great afford for them.

Many people say that Universities should offer places to young students with highest marks. Others feel that they should accept people with all ages, even if they do not do well. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Many people say that Universities should offer places to young students with highest marks. Others feel that they should accept people with all ages, even if they do not do well. Discuss both views and give your opinion.  .

 

IELTS ESSAY UNIVERSITIES ADMISSION

More and more universities, today, are establishing higher intake score benchmarks for aspirants under a specified age - for entry. Many find these stipulations quite rational though many voice their dissent over this, calling it unfair.

Varsities are premier places of education that have limited spaces. The dilemma of the authorities, in this case, is quite justifiable. If everyone were rendered a chance of entering these institutions, the possibility of the most deserving learners being deprived of opportunities of finding a place would increase by virtue of first come first serve rule coming into play. This would mean a great loss not only for the students but also for the society, as well.

Moreover, university courses need an intensive full-time study routine, as well as a high level of intellect, which average performers and ones being unable to commit themselves completely due to professional and personal obligations, may find it hard to cope with. This would not only cause a decline in quality of outcomes but also a rise in drop-outs. Thus, causing financial loss too – due to loss of fee with learners leaving mid-way.  

Some, nevertheless, find little substance in this policy. They feel, marks scored in exams – which may be obtained using strategies and unfair means -  fail to not elucidate true brilliance. Furthermore, an older individual may not have been able to enroll for a course because of certain limitations, but may be needing to join one in order to augment their skills. This would quite an injustice to those people.

To conclude, I feel that it is even though true that varsities need to prevent chaos and also maintain their academic reputation, a middle path must be discovered to also let in those who are willing to find a place in these institutions.