Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

The attitudes towards tourism being a form of  imperialism are ambivalent; there are sections that affirm that this sector is bringing several accolades for the nation, while others feel it is engendering environmental issues. In this essay, I shall elucidate my stance on this matter by deliberating upon the various aspects of this industry.

At the outset, those rallying behind this notion base their rationale on the fact that tourism brings forth people from diverse cultures and ethnicities together, empowering harmony between disparate communities, and promulgating bonhomie. Moreover, in order to  cater to the growing need of the industry, many professions have been founded, especially in the hospitality and transportation sector . This has seen multifold increment in the employment opportunities for the masses and bringing colossal revenue owing to the tourist developments leading to generating monetary benefits. 

However, the opponents might argue that tourism leads to expanding carbon footprint and tourists act in an irresponsible manner by creating a menace by littering around and defacing places.Nevertheless, this underlying notion can be challenged as the benefits reaped from this industry are umpteen: Owing to this, invaluable foreign exchange is being generated leading to reforming economies. More and more tourist destinations are being developed, making people aware and proud of their own cultural heritage.

Therefore, it can be asserted that this industry has witnessed an unprecedented influx of tourists in the contemporary times and aids in fetching unmatched yields such as facilitating cultural exchange, development of infrastructure, and generating sumptuous revenue.

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea 

Yes / no? Justify by giving an explanation 

Yes: many are wary of this activity, as it allows the powerful societies to overwhelm weaker ones and eventually gain control through cultural interaction that leads to economic dominance. 

+No: there are no parallels since imperialism was all about slavery and exploitation, while this activity is helping bring cultures closer.

   I disagree 

1. + this sector has opened the way for bringing people from diverse cultures and ethnicities together, creating opportunities for friendly exchange of views and ideas and fostering bonds. 

2. Helping generate revenues for the countries in invaluable foreign exchange. 

3. It is helping generate business worth billions and employment across a cross-section of skills - directly or indirectly related to this industry - for millions. 

4. Helping generate revenues for the upkeep of places of tourist interest. 

5. Creating awareness among natives about the relevance of their heritage. 

Agree 

1. Tourists act irresponsibly and go around littering and defacing places. 

2. This industry is also causing an expansion of carbon footprint in areas frequented by visitors. 

3. They with their mannerisms become a subject of wrath of locals. 

4. They are causing a distortion in local trades and employment patterns.    

Tourism, the modern phenomenon, despite being the largest sector globally, has earned the wrath of detractors who blame it for predisposing society and environment to an array of complications: economic, cultural, and environmental, and even compare it to imperialism. I fail to concur with these allegations in absolute terms, and shall elucidate my stand in following paragraphs.

To commence with, those harboring cynicism profess that this industry is promoting cultural invasion by virtue of alien travelers overwhelming the locals, especially the youth, with their mannerisms and clothing, thereby creating demands for foreign goods, and causing the advent of consumer companies, who eventually, take (wrest) control from local governments. Moreover, many are leaving their jobs to associate themselves with this industry, in turn, becoming susceptible to seasonal unemployment. Additionally, this is also leading to expansion of carbon footprint.

Nonetheless, these accusations lack conviction since influx of tourists into a country facilitates intermingling of cultures, and thus, helping forge harmonious relationships unlike slavery, an outcome of colonial settings. When guests and hosts interact with each other, they attempt to comprehend the distinct customs and ways of life, broadening the mindsets and creating bonhomie between the two.

Similarly, undeniably, the economic impact of this domain is unmatched: it has been responsible for creating direct and indirect employment - across a cross-section of skills - for millions, and businesses worth billions. Not only this, the state is also a direct beneficiary of this activity, for it collects taxes from all the nodes (venues) serving tourists, along with direct revenues in the form of foreign exchange.

In hindsight, the fears being expressed by critics of tourism are not well-founded since this form of leisure travel has benefitted the destination societies and travelers alike, churning out economic activity, and enabling the creation of cross-cultural bonds.

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Although the tourism industry is booming, it has invited flak from various quarters asserting that it is destroying local economies and the places of tourist interest, and is regarded as imperialism.

To start with, no parallels can be drawn between the two since imperialism was all about slavery and exploitation, while this activity opens windows for bringing people from different corners of the globe together, helping to create exchange of different perspectives and ideas; thus, creating harmony and appreciation for diversity. 

Along with this, the platform helps in building the global economy: churning out business worth billions and employment for millions. To corroborate, a study conducted by the Tourism Board of India indicated that the industry has offered forty precent  jobs in hotels, travel agencies and taxi businesses and is anticipated to further rise to sixty percent by 2040. Moreover, governments generate revenues, mostly, in the form of invaluable foreign exchange, a part of which is also used for the upkeep of tourist places, infrastructure and transportation.

Having said that, despite being unfounded, the skeptics assert the ramifications of growing tourism on environment, local trade and tourist spots: visitors tend to overuse or overexploit the natural resources; expansion of carbon footprint due to greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and improper disposal of trash. Also, they tend to cause accidental offenses, for instance, wearing an inappropriate dress in temples, leads tourists to become a subject of wrath of natives. Above all, the locals tend to abandon their traditional occupations to be  a part of tourism and become vulnerable to seasonal unemployment. 

In hindsight, I completely fail to subscribe to the idea that the activity is colonizing and pernicious to nature and tourist spots; rather, it is offering humongous benefits: enhancing the GDP and diversity.

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

The attitudes towards tourism being a form of imperialism are ambivalent; there are sections that affirm that this sector is bringing several accolades for the nation, while others feel it is engendering environmental issues. In this essay, I shall elucidate my stance on this matter by deliberating upon the various aspects of this industry.

At the outset, those rallying behind this notion base their rationale on the fact that tourism brings forth people from diverse cultures and ethnicities together, empowering harmony between disparate communities, and promulgating bonhomie. Moreover, in order to cater to the growing need of the industry, many professions have been founded, especially in the hospitality and transportation sector . This has seen multifold increment in the employment opportunities for the masses and bringing colossal revenue owing to the tourist developments leading to generating monetary benefits.

However, the opponents might argue that tourism leads to expanding carbon footprint and tourists act in an irresponsible manner by creating a menace by littering around and defacing places.Nevertheless, this underlying notion can be challenged as the benefits reaped from this industry are umpteen: Owing to this, invaluable foreign exchange is being generated leading to reforming economies. More and more tourist destinations are being developed, making people aware and proud of their own cultural heritage.

Therefore, it can be asserted that this industry has witnessed an unprecedented influx of tourists in the contemporary times and aids in fetching unmatched yields such as facilitating cultural exchange, development of infrastructure, and generating sumptuous revenue.

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

 Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Although the tourism industry is booming, it has invited flak from various quarters asserting that it is destroying local economies and the places of tourist interest, and is regarded as imperialism.

To start with, no parallels can be drawn between the two since imperialism was all about slavery and exploitation, while this activity opens windows for bringing people from different corners of the globe together, helping to create exchange of different perspectives and ideas; thus, creating harmony and appreciating diversity. Along with this, the platform helps in building the global economy: churning out business worth billions and employment for millions. To corroborate, a study conducted by the Tourism Board of India indicated that the industry has offered 40% jobs in hotels, travel agencies and taxi businesses and is anticipated to further rise to 68% by 2040. Moreover, governments generate revenues, mostly, in the form of invaluable foreign exchange, a part of which is also used for the upkeep of tourist places, infrastructure and transportation.

Having said that, despite being unfounded, the skeptics assert the ramifications of growing tourism on environment, local trade and tourist spots: visitors tend to overuse or overexploit the natural resources; expansion of carbon footprint due to greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and improper disposal of trash. Also, they tend to cause accidental offenses, for instance, wearing an inappropriate dress in temples, leads tourists to become a subject of wrath of natives. Above all, the locals tend to abandon their traditional occupations to be  a part of tourism and become vulnerable to seasonal unemployment. 

In hindsight, I completely fail to subscribe to the idea that the activity is colonizing and pernicious to nature and tourist spots; rather, it is offering humongous benefits: enhancing the GDP and diversity.

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism.It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea? - IELTS ESSAY

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism.It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea? 

Ielts Essay - Is Tourism Neocolonialism? 

Nowadays, tourism is becoming a Pan global phenomena that is spreading to the various corners the world, giving people an oppurtiunity to interact with the civilizations that were considered aliens a little while ago. It is becoming a potent industry that is fueling growth in the nations that are being explored by the tourists.

There is no similarity to be cited between the colonialism and the Tourism, because colonialism was by force and made slaves, whereas tourism is creating an interaction between people and creating bonds. Tourism is turning into a profitable source of funds for the economies. It helps the governments to generate huge revenues, which are channelized to preserve the Monuments and locations in their originality. Tourism also creates awareness and respect among the local populace for their Heritage. 

Besides this, enormous potential for new employment opportunities and the growth and development of the infrastructure are generated thus fueling the components of the economies. For e.g. the site that is promoted attract a constant flow of the tourists, which brings along improvements in various basic and infrastructural facilities, right from transportation, Hotels, Health, Communications etc.

However, although there are strong critics to tourism, their perceptions make them purists and forbid intermingling. For e.g. in the orthodox society of the Middle east, feels that this factor is damaging their Society, as when the travelers arrive from west, they bring along their culture and mannerisms, which are unacceptable. There is one more factor that aids the point of contention of the detractors of tourism, as some irresponsible tourists do behave irrational and go around littering and defacing the Monuments.

In conclusion, I think, whatever critics feel, the dynamics of tourism is a commendable source of Inspiration for the economies and the people world over, in commercial as well as the Cultural.