Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Although some believe that taxing manufacturing units alone can act as a reliable medium of coaxing them to switch to greener technologies, this is highly questionable: it is prone to failure. I believe there are more potent tools of convincing manufacturers to act.   

Those advocating environmental tariffs found their argument on the assumption that this move would make the produce expensive, and thus uncompetitive, forcing organizations to spring into action and embrace eco-friendly methods. However, these enthusiastic lobbyists conveniently disregard  an infallible fact that the pollution is not the outcome of an isolated exception, but the industry as a whole, and every manufacturer will espouse evasive strategies. They will compromise with the quality and quantity, and shift the extra burden to the end users, turning the policy ineffective. 

Nevertheless, the need of the hour is to find remedies that can produce tangible outcomes rather than just doing lip service. It is essential to engage businesses by making them partners in the endeavors aimed at ensuring a sustainable environment, and this goal can be achieved if they are made stakeholders in research projects that target discovery of environmentally-friendly fuels, manufacturing techniques, and waste disposal policies.

Similarly, affording monetary stimulus, in the form of tax holidays and rebates, subsidies and support funding, can do wonders in convincing companies to take ownership, and make efforts to phase out old unsustainable and unviable technologies and equipment, and replace them with environmentally-sound procedures and processes. This system has been welcomed by industrialists in countries like China and Germany, for it is a persuasive rather than a punitive measure.

In hindsight, taxation is likely to encourage the industry to resort to unfair means, but partnering with them, besides extending financial inducements, will provoke honest and devoted efforts for environmental protection.  

Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Yes this is the only way 

• Many assume Imposing an environmental levy on them would persuade them to act and switch to greener standards. When  their produce will become expensive, they will be forced to adopt measures 
• They would be able to appreciate the damage their activities are causing to the surroundings 

NO this is not the only way

• - The ground reality is far from being rosy: the industry owners the proposer of this policy are assuming constitute the whole sector.
• - The manufacturers and the industry owners will pass the burden  to the consumers by manipulating their products - quantity and quality
• - The best way is to engage business owners in these endeavors and make them partners in projects aimed at protecting environment
• -Rendering them inducements such as financial benefits  for shifting to ecologically sustainable methods  

There is a general perception that levying environmental tax on the industry is the best tool to induce manufacturing units to embrace methods to mitigate pollution, but others are skeptical about this. I completely fail to concur with this arrangement since it will not yield desired outcomes. To begin with, companies not following environmentally friendly procedures must be fined for the damage they have bestowed on the planet; this will not only cause them to abandon their harmful methods but also reduce the future damage to nature in terms of air, and water pollution. No one would like to be penalized in an era when awareness about the green environment is rampant, green levies will not only make produce expensive to buy but also unpopular among the enlightened people. This will persuade industrialists to switch to modern techniques and greener methods. Having said that, there are some who quash the former view, they think such a move is likely to remain ineffective; businesses will find some other means to escape from the fines. They will pass on the pressure of the extra financial burden onto the consumers by raising the prices marginally, and continue with their outdated methods. There is a need to vest responsibility onto the producers to persuade them to act prudently and realize the extent of damage their activities are causing. They could, for instance, be allocated areas around their units which have to be taken care of by them, both in terms of economic and environmental aspects. To cap it all, disputes aside, this policy is likely to fail in persuading manufacturers to adopt greener methods to alleviate emissions and improve the surroundings. The state should instead resort to more innovative strategies that entail active participation of the industry.

Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree? - Ielts Essay

Most pollution, especially air and water pollution, is caused by industry. If we want to protect the environment, we should make factories and other forms of industry pay of all the pollution that they cause. That is the only way to make sure that the owners will make a serious effort to reduce the pollution that they cause. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay - Is taxing Polluters a Viable Solution?

If observed closely, it is quite evident that mushrooming manufacturing units have become a major source of pollution of all the spheres of the planet – air, water and land. This has alarmed environmentalists, and forced them to raise their pitch for imposing tax on the manufacturing sector to encourage erring manufacturers to adopt green technologies.

Taxing the errant manufacturers to compensate for all the pollution, they are creating, would prove to be a highly productive step. The manufacturers would be persuaded to incorporate greener practices, and use environmental friendly material – instead of high content contaminants, as the production process would become costlier, as a result of imposition of additional levies – that might render the final products unfeasible for competitive markets. Commercial compulsions, to keep the costs down in the long run, would force them producers to shelve age old technologies and try innovative techniques that produce lesser pollutants.   

Moreover, manufacturers must realize that they are also a part of the society with which they share this planet. Imposing environment levies would make them appreciate social responsibility, and they would be inspired to adopt eco-friendly approach.   Furthermore, the money collected from levies for polluting environment could be used to clean up environment, and also find environment friendly alternatives. 

However, there are certain apprehensions in the implementation of such a step. It is commonly believed that manufacturers even after being taxed would not be convinced to make necessary changes in their methods of production and their practices since they would be more interested in transferring the levies to the customers in form of slightly inflated prices of the goods.

To sum up, I personally feel that imposing taxes would inspire manufacturers to adopt environment friendly technologies, and consequently bring down pollution. Therefore, this policy should be enacted for the larger good: for public and the environment.