Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

 

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

It has been observed that people are not cautious enough about recycling their household waste. There is a lobby that believes the policy makers should don the mantle to integrate recycling into their lives by making it an obligation by law. This essay will justify the rationale behind this notion.

Since the state is well equipped with the funds as well as jurisdiction so it can easily take the initiative to enact the laws for escalating the process of recycling to protect the environment from the envisioned ecological disaster by imposing heavy penalties on non-compliance and such actions would compel/push people to incorporate recycling into their daily regime in order to avoid legal punishments. From this perspective, making recycling mandatory would be of great afford.

Moreover, due to the lack of awareness amongst a slew of people since not many awareness campaigns render information/coverage on this topic,  therefore, government intervention through the legal code would enlighten them about the practice, the method to integrate it, the equipment required to carry out the process, and so on, thereby keeping them abreast of their social responsibility towards improving their surroundings. Besides this, such regulations would help individuals to comprehend how the process of reusing could save their valuable earnings which can be further utilised to accomplish their other indispensable commitments, which would act as a motivation factor for them.

 

To reiterate, I strongly feel that the state should take initiative to frame policies to incorporate recycling into the regimes of the individuals as a mandatory process, but simultaneously, also making them comprehend that this process is accompanied by a plethora of positive aspects such as safeguarding the environment and monetary benefits as well.

Light pollution (excessive light during night time) is a form of pollution that distresses many people, especially in modern cities. What are the causes of light pollution, and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take?

 

Light pollution (excessive light during night time) is a form of pollution that distresses many people, especially in modern cities. What are the causes of light pollution, and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take?

In the contemporary era, a new form of pollution has emerged in urbanised locations owing to the utilisation of lights intensively. This essay shall discuss the reasons behind this phenomenon and render some proposals for the state to surmount this growing issue.

This sort of pollution can be attributed to several factors. The incessantly rising crimes, especially in the metropolitan areas has turned the authorities quite apprehensive by virtue of which they install a plethora of lights to keep streets, alleys and even main roads well illuminated to mitigate the incidents of burglary, mugging and several other horrific crimes which usually takes place during the night. Moreover, the spiralling need to stay in limelight forces companies to slog hard round the clock in order to attain visibility among their targeted audience which  leads them install large well illuminated billboards and their signboards that emanate bright luminescence, and over and above using of intensive lighting to keep the factories well lit to enable the workforce to work and produce day and night to meet/satiate the growing demand. 

Besides this, urbanites are influenced prominently by night life; therefore, they indulge themselves extensively in celebrations, during the night, such as marriages, parties, get-togethers, and so on owing to which they decorate their surroundings with a variety of lights, thereby emitting pollution in great amounts.

However, the panacea for this predicament can only be found by the joint efforts of the policy makers as well as the enterprises. Government should enact laws and escalate police patrolling at night to render secure surroundings to the urbanites exempted from all sorts of offences so that the support of lights can be abandoned and fears overcome. Furthermore, businesses should employ efficient machinery and manpower as well, to accomplish the work during the day time to avoid the hazardous emissions in the form of light. They should also volunteer to limit the number of hours they light up gigantic hoardings and signboards.

To reiterate, I feel even though light pollution, especially in the urban locales  is surely a growing and a worrying problem, it can be mitigated easily, provided that the state as well as companies don the mantle to curb this ecological disaster by deploying appropriate initiatives, and extend a safe environment to the society.

Some people believe we need to pay higher taxes in order for the government to build population’s basic needs services. Others say government should find other means to get funds for it. What should the government do, in your opinion?

Some people believe we need to pay higher taxes in order for the government to build population’s basic needs services. Others say government should find other means to get funds for it. What should the government do, in your opinion?

Ielts Essay - Should we pay more Taxes? 

Growing concerns regarding satisfying needs of populace has encouraged many to suggest that governments should charge more  taxes from citizens, whereas, there are others who are quite skeptical of this. But, what the state should do is a matter worth delving deep into.

Levying higher taxes seems to be quite justified. Inflation  is riding out of control that is making everything dearer, thus severely  hampering ability of authorities to lay even the basic goods and services at the disposal of inhabitants. Raising, or creating new provisions will help generating revenues to ensure appropriate funding for various welfare schemes for public support. It is firmly believed whatever taxpayers shell out accrues back to them in form of benefits.

Moreover, the proposal of raising collections by way of increasing levies is based on the fact that over the past few years, population, especially that of elderly who completely rely on government support,  has been rising exponentially which is clearly offsetting any attempts made in sustaining and improving the level of public support network. Everything costs money, and hence, as the governments are run on public funding, people must readily part with some more to compensate for the pressure created by an increased number of people.

Nevertheless, there are others who feel that such a step will be too harsh a treatment for already over-burdened tax-payers. It would make it hard for them to make adjustments in their budgets; and the authorities should instead focus on other innovative ways to raise money such as participating in commercial activities; running their own concerns that  foray into  profit making exercise.

Henceforth, I personally feel, exerting pressure on inhabitants by increasing burden of taxes will surely prove to be counter productive, and hence taxes should not be raised. 

Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and examples. - Ielts Essay

Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and examples.

 

Ielts Essay - University Fee 

University studies have always been considered important for the development of a country. Appreciating this, many people have started suggesting that the governments should pay the academic fees for the individuals intending to join universities for higher studies, while there are some who feel differently about this.

Government bearing the fees of varsity studies seems to be a very viable suggestion. Studies at universities can cost arms and legs, and many people are not keen to go ahead with this even if they can afford. Furthermore, most of the students are discouraged from joining varsities since they are not in a position to pay annual fees. If government can ensure this, there would be rise in number of students enrolling for higher studies.  It would not only act as a placebo for those who can afford but also help in encouraging pupils from weaker socioeconomic backgrounds, to go for varsity courses.  

Moreover, almost every country is facing a dearth of people working in specialist domains since only varsities can churn out specialists with higher intellect and perspectives. But, today a majority of pupils do not wish to spend another three to four years in pursuing Masters or Doctorates since they would have to pay money instead of earning it. Payment of fee by government would surely act as an inducement, and more and more people would surely take up university studies.

However, if the government were to completely subsidize, or rather offer it for free, the education at the varsity, it may prove counter-productive as it would tax the financial resources of the government, and to get over that governments would end up raising taxes.

To conclude, government paying the fee is surely a positive suggestion and should be implemented across the globe. 

Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the medical treatment may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. Do you agree or disagree with this? Write in at least 250 words. - Ielts Essay

Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the medical treatment may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. Do you agree or disagree with this?  Write in at least 250 words.   

 

Ielts Essay - Free Medical Assistance 

Many governments are mulling rendering free medical care to natives. This, although has invited a lot of controversies, a majority vouches for such a provision, even if the policy does not include extending advanced and costly diagnostic and treatment system to public. But would this be practical enough?

Laying costless medical care at the disposal of the natives of a country is a very feasible option, despite keeping too expensive facilities out of the premise of the policy. This would be highly beneficial for the society as a whole since a major part of population, including aged people, of every country lives in miserable conditions, and are in no position to afford even the basic medical assistance. Making available such assistance would enable to the people to access medical support in times of need and get adequate treatment at the right time.

On the top of that, the medical assistance categories, to be kept out of the purview of the policy, are used to dispense treatment for some major diseases and ailments. Most of the disease are primarily lifestyle related and affect the elite class, and elite class can afford availing such treatment. Furthermore, treatments needing expensive procedures could be subsidized by the government and costs could be shared with the taxpayers and other NGOs.

However, this proposal has serious flaws since the cost of carrying out research to find new alternatives for new strains of even common disease and disorders are rising. This would raise the cost of diagnose, treatment and medicines, which eventually lead to exclusion of almost diseases at some point of time. This would make free health support irrelevant and useless.

To conclude, free services should include everything or should be abolished  altogether.