Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What do you think are the reasons for this? Do the advantages of the trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What do you think are the reasons for this? Do the advantages of the trend outweigh the disadvantages?

It is commonly observed that the age gap between two generations in families has been incrementing remarkably, which can be attributed to scores of causes. However, it is essential to ascertain whether the benefits of this evolution exceed its shortcomings.

To start with, the most prominent driver of this trend is the growing craving among the couples to spend some time together; foster bonhomie; know each other well; and cultivate maturity to successfully negotiate the daunting task of rearing offspring. Similarly, many have become career-oriented, especially the women, and want to attain professional success before donning the mantle of parenting.

The only brighter side of this vogue is becoming possible for mothers and fathers to lay every imaginable facility and comfort at the disposal of their little ones. Undeniably, as one grows older, they tend to earn occupational proficiency, which brings them better earnings, helping them amass enough wealth to provide for comfortable living that is populated by modern gadgets and decent lifestyles, quality education, and also for exigencies and uncertainties facing youngsters when they advance to higher education.

Nevertheless, the fascinating praise (eulogization) afforded to this evolution fails to convince once the shortfalls are seriously considered: the increasing difference has made things complicated both for the parents and the children; the former are unable to participate in the lives of the latter actively. To add to woes, the older parents are likely to die when their wards are still young, leaving young members feeling lonely and insecure, not having anyone to share their worries and concerns with, and seek guidance from.

Overall, the yearning for independence and occupational accomplishments is fueling this propensity, and extends certain favors, but these surely do not overshadow the cons, it is the other way round instead.

Many parents use punishment to teach the difference between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is unnecessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

 Many parents use punishment to teach the difference between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is unnecessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Parenting is arduous, and to negotiate it effectively, many resort to retribution, but this conservative approach is challenged by modern thinkers who vouch for abandoning the punitive practice, who vociferously assert that this can impede growth of young minds. 

For many, it is almost instinctive to respond to obstinate behavior by youngsters with retribution. They believe in an old saying, “Spare the rod and spoil the kid”; thus, they find it quite convenient educate their wards, so that similar mistakes do not recur and young individuals circumvent acting with impunity and taking things for granted. Rebuking them will let them appreciate the difference between the right and wrong effortlessly and also compel them to follow norms unconditionally. 

Similarly, reprimanding is also a way of inciting discipline in growing minds who must realize and appreciate the value of virtue of a righteous ways of life. This can help foster rational approach among the future citizens who would learn to abstain from unsocial behavior, later in life, and grow up as lawful and well-informed adults.  

Nevertheless, the contemporary concepts popularized by child theorists defy the traditional child rearing methods that entail chastising; it can adversely impact young personalities, turning them into either rebellious - who might seek vengeance later on others, or timid - unable to make their own decisions, and see the things from their own perspective. This, in modern times when in nuclear family system is the norm, those growing up in punitive environment may end leading a disturbed adult life.   

In hindsight, the most important thing is that when simple rules are not working, creating more will not help. Rather a conversation and a healthy dialogue will be more appropriate. Juveniles will be more willing to listen if parents first listen to them.

Many parents use punishment to teach the difference between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is unnecessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Many parents use punishment to teach the difference between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is unnecessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a lobby that believes the punishment is imperative for the young ones to make them competent in differentiating the right from wrong. This essay shall justify the rationale behind their perspective and discuss that of others.

Many are in favour of this practice. A slew of parents deploy this practice to make their wards comprehend the distinction between right and wrong since they believe such actions alleviates the tendency of repeating the same mistakes all over again in the little ones. This helps impart lessons for life as they always give a second thought before undertaking an erroneous or wrongful act, pushing them to mend their ways, thereby turning them into rational adults later in life. Moreover, it helps in inculcating a sense of discipline among the youngsters which serves as a deterrent to them against transcending the limits set by their mothers and fathers.

However, punishment leaves a profound impression on these tender minds, as detractors of retribution profess, which affects the psyche of young individuals prominently, causing distortions in their behaviour. Since reprimanding instills fear in some sensitive children, owing to which they become introverts when they grow into adults, and due to the lack of confidence they encounter a wide array of challenges in their life later on. Similarly,  some may turn out to be rebels by virtue of which they go astray from the paths directed by their parents, leading to severe repercussions such as involvement in fallacious acts, evolution of criminal instincts, and so on.

 

To reiterate, I strongly feel that the employment of punishment by parents in order to teach moral lessons to their wards is accompanied by a plethora of negative aspects since such actions adversely affect the mental wellbeing of the tender minds and the aftermath might be irrevocable.

Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 

Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is nowadays an intriguing debate brewing up as there is a lobby that believes the mothers and fathers should impart knowledge to their wards about recycling while the others feel that the school should don the mantle to instil its relevance among the young ones.

Since parents are the role models to their children they should take the initiative by setting precedents for their wards, so that these young ones follow the footsteps of the former, and incorporate recycling in their regime. Furthermore, families can disseminate the idea of recycling to the tender minds by fostering it in the form of several fun activities and games while teaching them a variety of social as well as moral values and make them comprehend their responsibility towards improving the surroundings.

But, the other lobby believes that school is accountable for making the pupils comprehend the prominence of reuse. This process can be introduced in the school curriculum through which students can imbibe it with great ease with the help of colourful books integrated with graphics since pictures leave an everlasting impression on the growing minds, and compel and enlighten them to contribute towards the environment. Moreover, these formal settings have a lot of room to organise several drives and campaigns for recycling owing to which the little ones could inculcate the procedure in themselves through the hands-on practical experience, thereby keeping them abreast of the equipment required to follow this practice.

To reiterate, I strongly feel that both parents as well as school must share the responsibility of enlightening the young individuals about the significance of recycling since they consider both as mentors so their teachings would leave a long lasting impression on the tender minds and help them to become a responsible citizen.

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a large number of toys? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a large number of toys? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 

In the contemporary era, a slew of parents bestow on their wards a wide array of toys and games. This essay shall discuss the merits as well as drawbacks of this new phenomenon.

 

Nowadays, parents are intensively indulging in their professional endeavours by virtue of which they fail to devote time and to keep a round the clock vigil on their little ones. By extending a variety of toys, they substitute their time which helps their wards to escape the feeling of being isolated and also to keep them engaged in the toys rather than craving for time and attention from their mothers and fathers. Furthermore, they do not always look for the support of someone to amuse themselves.

 

However, this practice pushes them to play individually rather than encouraging them to engage in groups which acts as an inhibition for them in imbibing a rich profusion of social as well as moral values such as sharing, caring, communicating, developing social networks, cooperation, and so on, owing to which they fail to turn into rationale adults in the life later on. Consequently, some of them become introverts when they turn into teenagers, and due to the lack of confidence, they find it difficult to muster courage while approaching others. Moreover, this act hampers the mental growth of children since the availability of a plethora of playthings inhibits stimulation of creativity as well as imagination.

 

To reiterate, despite some positive aspects of rendering a plethora of toys to the young ones, its negative aspects completely eclipse the merits since it impedes their holistic development due to which they have to encounter several challenges in the years to come.

Some parents say that children should play individually more than in a group. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this and include your own opinion.

Some parents say that children should play individually more than in a group. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this and include your own opinion.

 

Playing is very crucial for the development of the young ones. There is a lobby that believes they can learn more while playing independently rather than playing in teams. This essay shall delve into the positive and negative aspects of this practice.

When children play in isolation without their friends or anyone else, they get deprived of numerous skills and values. They do not get an opportunity to learn social, as well as moral values, such as sharing, caring, communicating, developing social networks, cooperation, and so on. As a result of which, some of them become introverts when they turn into teenagers, and due to the lack of confidence, they find it difficult to muster courage while approaching others.

Additionally, if they play individually they never get satisfied with what they have, resulting in the spiralling of their demands to possess a diverse range of toys and games; however, they can satiate their desires by borrowing from their teammates while playing. Furthermore, parents are less worried about their wards since they get a company of others as nowadays, they are highly engaged in their work-life owing to which they do not get adequate time to look after their children round the clock.

The children start comparing with others present in the group, which pose a difficulty for some parents who cannot afford a similar lifestyle for them, thereby, escalating their financial obligations and pushing them into crisis. Moreover, they do not always look for the support of someone to amuse themselves.

To reiterate, for the holistic development of the children, playing in teams will be of great afford for them. The drawbacks of playing independently eclipse its merits; hence, I fail to concur with the statement.

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. This is having a negative impact on the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. This is having a negative impact on the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Child rearing has always been an arduous task. With the changing times, the way of leading lives has transformed drastically; pushing people to abandon the conventional ways of fostering their wards and leaving young ones bereft of care and attention in the process. There is a common perception this has a detrimental effect on a majority of children.

Nowadays, over  engagement of mothers and fathers in their professional pursuits is causing them to neglect their little ones. This is creating a void in the relationship between them and their wards by mitigating the understanding between them, thereby weakening the ties. Such an evolution, as many fear, might cause alienation among them due to lack of emotional connection.  

Moreover, this isolation deprives the growing minds of opportunities to embrace numerous skills and values. They do not get a chance to learn social, as well as moral values, and by virtue of which, some of them become introverts when they grow into adults, and due to the lack of confidence, they find it difficult to muster courage while approaching others.

Furthermore, parents fail to monitor the regular activities of their children which results in severe repercussions, leading to distortion in the behaviour as well as affecting the psyche of tender minds prominently since in the contemporary era, these unchecked youngsters are indulging extensively in the technology and consider it to be their mentor which plays a prominent role in shaping their lives.

To reiterate,  parents should consider child upbringing to be the utmost priority by rendering adequate time to their wards and monitor their conduct meticulously, otherwise neglecting them will leave a long lasting negative impact on the immature minds which would be irrevocable. Thus, I concur with the statement.

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Ielts Essay Joint Family or Nuclear one 

In contemporary times, when nuclear families are a norm of the day, many often profoundly argue whether rearing children in a nuclear family is worthwhile, or it is more useful to let them grow in an extended family. 

Raising young ones in an extended family carries numerous benefits, as many social theorists suggest. These kinds of  family settings allow the children to not only know their parents but also familiarize themselves with their grandparents, uncles, aunts, and their cousins. This helps foster cohesive family identity and also lets the young minds get acclimatized with the traditions and cultures that have been passed down the generations. Thus, assisting in perpetuation of customs and rituals. Several studies have shown, where young individuals grow in a joint family are more closely connected to and are enlightened about their roots.

Moreover, joint family arrangement affords better monitoring of the tender minds. Many a time, children need disciplining, and at times moral support which can be ill-afforded by couples living away from their joint family environment. When others seniors are there to observe and counsel, mothers and fathers rarely need to worry about as they go around fulfilling their professional and social obligations.

Nevertheless, many favor non-extended family settings. As per them, children  growing up in nuclear family set-up  stay emotionally connected to  their fathers and mothers. This generally is seen as highly beneficial during ageing, as youngsters appreciate their responsibilities towards their parents and are in a better state to render care for old during the twilight years of the latter.

To conclude, even though the decision of bringing up young ones in a joint family or a nuclear one relies completely on people involved or the circumstance, child rearing can become more effective the former settings.

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay Modern Lifestyles and Kids 

Nowadays, as everybody is embracing modern living, and spending more and more time at work and leisure, children seem to be at the receiving end: they are hardly subjected to monitoring, and rarely rendered affection unlike their counterparts did in the past. I feel that this trend seems to have descended permanently and will radically impact the family system.

It is undeniable that these days, in most families, both the parents are engrossed heavily in  fulfilling their professional obligations, which takes away a major portion of their time by either keeping them confined to their office cubicles, or making them travel for work; thus, resulting in their absence from their homes and families, and robbing them of even the leisure intervals that could be otherwise devoted to their off springs.

Besides this, with the rising living costs, it has become essential for many to keep seeking ways to bolster earnings. People have to often resort to foraying into multiple occupations. This intent is accompanied by need to obtain extra education and expertise. Undertaking such an endeavor makes mothers and fathers to devote their free time – even when they are at home – to their studies. This pushes the priority of looking after the children down the ladder.

On the top of that, whatever time parents can spare, is used in meeting their social obligations. As many suggest, keeping up with the society and prevalent trends is only  possible if people stay in touch with the peer group. This makes it imperative for both the spouses to divert their attention away from their children into enhancing their social presence. 

To conclude, it can be hence be said that mothers and fathers are left with little time to spare for their children, and this is going to stay. However, this is gong to have an adverse impact on the family life.  

The difference in age between parents and their children has increased compared to the past. Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

The difference in age between parents and their children has increased compared to the past. Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Ielts Essay Age Gap between Parents And Children 

Social theorists are today, intrigued by the new trend that is seeing people having children much later than they had in the past. Nevertheless, this has both strengths and shortfalls though I find this phenomenon to be laden with more shortfalls than strengths.

It is not too hard to enumerate failings of this trend: kids tend to miss golden opportunities to get involved in various activities with their parents – which tends to make them less and less confident and more and more lonely. As mothers and fathers grow old, they lose ability to cope up with the demands of their sons and daughters, of participating in activities, especially that require physical efforts such as playing some kind of sports, or  activities, like helping with home-works. This creates a void in the mental and physical growth of the young ones.

Moreover, this is leading to frictions due to generation gap: the bigger the age-difference, wider the wedge of aspirations and expectations between the generations, and greater the likelihood of clashes. With the things changing fast, the technology, the social set-up and even the working-methods are witnessing radical transformations, and by the time the kids turn into adults, parents are already a thing of by-gone era, as some may suggest. This creates difference in almost everything, thus making them incompatible to each other.

However, this phenomena does have a brighter side too, the parents who have kids later in life tend to offer financial stability to their families, as most of them have already established themselves in their careers and are near the pinnacle, which helps them earn handsome money; thus a promising future to the kids.

To cap it, this is quite clear that drawbacks of this trend eclipse its benefits; hence it may prove to be detrimental  in long run.

Many people believe it is the school’s responsibility to teach children not to eat junk food. - Ielts Essay

Many people believe it is the school’s responsibility to teach children not to eat junk food. Others believe parents should do this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Ielts Essay - Who should keep children away from junk food

Since a past few decades, fast food – bereft of any essential nutrition – has been gaining popularity among kids. A dire need is being felt to dissuade young ones from this faulty food habit, but who should take this responsibility: teachers or parents, is profoundly debated.

It would be quite justified a suggestion  if mothers and fathers were made to don the responsibility of fostering healthy eating habit among their kids since  they can set examples for kids. After all, sons and daughters are the responsibility of their parents, and most of the kids tend to follow precedents of their moms and dads: they are introduced to fast food by these very people only – who themselves indulge in enjoying junk food, so if the intake of food is controlled at home, children will follow the suit.

Furthermore, children fear their mothers and fathers the most, and hence tend to follow the discipline established at home: if the parent made it compulsory for their kids to avoid fast food, the children would have to comply. Many studies have clearly elucidated this fact, when parents tend to exert a strict discipline on what to consume and what not to, kids tend to follow those orders like sermons.

However, there are others who suggest that schools should take initiative in this direction. Such an argument is based on the fact that kids spend most of their time at school, among their classmates: they tend to follow the habits of their peers more closely, and if schools made it point to persuade pupils to consuming healthy intake, the kids would easily yield.

To conclude, I personally feel that keeping junk food out of little mouths will be only possible if both teachers and parent shouldered the responsibility jointly.

Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is it happening? Is it a positive or a negative development? - sample 2

Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is it happening? Is it a

positive or a negative development?

 

Ielts Essay - Children Playing electronic Games 

Playing games on electronic gadgets have been courting controversies over their impact on the children, the most widely affected group. Several experts seem to be profoundly concerned about this recent development, and are seeking causes of this problem. 

The most common reason for children getting increasingly inclined to choosing modern gadgets over traditional games is the parents themselves. Despite parents denying this fact, it is the moms and dads who are actually encouraging children to take up this activity. It is said that kids always take up cues from their parents, and today when even the fathers and mothers are themselves inclined to always running their fingers on these gadgets, it is likely for the young ones to take up this activity.

The new development has some great benefits to offer with the development of cognitive skills of children. While playing games on these devices, which have unpredictable content provides abundant sensory inputs to the growing minds, in regards to problems, possible strategies that could be adopted to resolve problems and finally the implementation of a chosen way out. Many institutions have in fact taken up this method to extend benefits of seamless and effortless learning, to the students.

However, the controversy refuses to fade away as the vehement critics cite various shortcomings of playing games on electronic devices. The gaming content on these devices tend to overwhelm the senses of tender minds; to the extent that kids even try to emulate their virtual avatars, which could be, of course, violent too. The content in the games is also believed to be fueling aggressive behavior among the children.

Hence, I believe, it is quite easy to blame electronic devices for our own flaws, but judicious use is recommended, as this modern equipment has several benefits.

Nowadays in some countries children are given fewer responsibilities compared to the past. Some people believe it is a positive development while others argue otherwise. Discuss both views. What is your opinion? Give some relevant examples from your own experience.

Nowadays in some countries children are given fewer responsibilities compared to the past. Some people believe it is a positive development while others argue otherwise. Discuss both views. What is your opinion? Give some relevant examples from your own experience.

Ielts Essay - Responsibilities and Children 

Child rearing has always been a complicated issue, and every generation has defined its own privileges and limits in this regards. In the current times, it can be observed that parents are not as keen to lay onus of carrying out certain tasks on children as they did earlier. This trend does have some benefits though also some drawbacks.

Keeping children free of any duties really comes in as a boon in disguise since children are now left with only one task: focus on their academic performance. The times are becoming competitive, and with that the amount and intensity of academic assignments are also rising. The kids are often seen bringing back loads of homework and assignments from the schools, so not burdening them with non-essential work at home helps them to complete their assignments easily, thereby enabling them to develop competence for domains critical to the professions they may pursue later in life.

However, this trend is marred by several negative consequences; as keeping them free of any responsibilities denies them chance to develop general awareness. Children today grow up as an ignorant lot that is grossly apathetic to its surroundings, and live in the boundaries created for themselves for themselves. These kids tend to turn self centered that often results in aggressive behavior too, since they are not trained to be sensitive to needs of others – that handling responsibilities can teach.

Furthermore, children tend to perform poorly when it comes to critical soft and life skills. Kids today are not able to socialize, perform their tasks independently and above all not even able comprehend situations and decide their course of actions to resolve problems.

To conclude, I feel denying children chance to handle responsibilities is denying them opportunities to learn about critical aspects of life. 

Nowadays young people have to make the decision about their future career. Some people, however, believe that teachers and parents can make a better choice for their future career. Discuss both options and include your opinion with relevant examples from your own experience

Nowadays young people have to make the decision about their future career. Some people, however, believe that teachers and parents can make a better choice for their future career. Discuss both options and include your opinion with relevant examples from your own experience.

 

Ielts Essay - Careers 

A tug of war of sorts can be experienced between the young and the old generation when it comes to choosing a career for young. Even though some might quote several reasons to validate the right of young people while making a choice of profession, moms and dads, and mentors have their own concerns and feel it should be prerogative of elders.

Parents have conventionally been considered to be the right people when it comes to deciding about the professional domain their children should pursue. Older generation has all the experience and seasoning required to make such tricky choices, since they have been through the thin and thick of the life, and have borne the brunt of taking wrong decisions early on  in their lives. All parents and coaches have a very pious intent; to see their children attain success in their lives, and avoid entering into a profession that might not bring continuity.

Similarly, tutors are armed with a great amount of information about weaknesses and strengths of their pupils. It has been observed that teachers can give definitive direction to the tryst of the young people by hand picking the professional realm and equipping kids according to the expectations and requirements of the chosen fields.

However, young individuals should have a last say in what they would like to pursue and work in. After all it is matter connected to their future, and nobody has right to intervene. The times have always changed and with that have changed the requirements and expectations. Old people despite living through various phases may not have appropriate knowhow to negotiate challenges in present context.

To conclude, I personally feel that young people should be allowed to have a greater say in matter of choosing their future course of action even though they must seek advice in matters that can influence their professional performance. 

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a large number of toys? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a large number of toys? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
 

Ielts Essay - Toys But How Many???

Even though playing with toys form an inseparable of part of daily activities of childhood since this plays a pivotal role in the mental and physical development of children, how many toys are deemed suitable is matter of intense debate.

Making large number of toys available to the youngsters  has its own drawbacks since sheer volume and types of gadgets disorient, overwhelm and clutter tender minds, and interfere with thinking process. As a result, they are unable to derive satisfaction from this important activity. The fact is elucidated by the findings of various studies and experiments, tender minds find it oneorous to focus on any single toy and that prevents them from involving themselves effectively with those playthings. Consequently, they also tend to miss not only really important hints required to nurture and support creativity but also are bereft of opportunities that could be used to socialize with the family members and siblings.

Moreover, this practice makes juveniles grow up as self centered, arrogant and careless. They are rarely able to grasp critical hints about cooperating with others, especially with their own siblings. It has also been found that juveniles are not able to take care of their belongings, when in excess, but their craving and expectations for more and more toys keeps rising.

However, many justify this propensity by citing various unsubstantiated reasons such as, nowadays, families are becoming nuclear, that are many a time devoid of grandparents, and sometimes even brothers and sisters. Presence of many play devices helps lift loneliness that young individuals experience. Above all, this equipment compensate for the absence of parents during working hours.

To conclude, I believe laying surfeit toys at the disposal of young minds, is laden with umpteen drawbacks - this can make them too possessive at best, and hence, this practice should be avoided.  

Some people say that a person’s success depends on his/her upbringing by parents. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.

Some people say that a person’s success depends on his/her upbringing by parents. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.

 

Ielts Essay - Upbring and Success

Success is something that is followed by every human being keenly, and every expert on this planet is trying to find key to this elusive phenomena. Many feel that successful people have a solid and qualitative foundation laid down by their moms and dads, but does this factor really influence an accomplished individual’s life? Or are there are certain other factors too?

Parents have been traditionally regarded as a driving force behind accomplishments of individuals, since they have always donned roles of mentors, advisers and guides. Right from the birth, moms and dads instill critical life skills in kids, such as differentiating between good and bad; behaving, behaving and forging relationships; handling stress during tough phases, etc. The training received, independent of any external intervention, in the family has a long lasting effect on psyche of kids and teaches them to be resilient, and successfully negotiate personal and professional spheres of life. 

Moreover, family background has always influenced professional beliefs and convictions of individuals. The informal training received in the families always overwhelmingly steer the personalities and negotiating skills. For instance, individuals born in the families involved in business would surely turnout to be highly successful in business since they are guided by the critical clues picked while observing parents negotiate business and professional challenges; and identify opportunities to be grabbed.  

However, an accomplished personality does not necessarily have to be nurtured in the early years. There could be many factors that influence success of an individual, like the formal education received, the company kids keep, and opportunities and the timing of chances being made available.

To sum up, I personally believe, although parental guidance and rearing may have some impact on the personality, success is surely not a result of upbringing.

Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. - Ielts Essay

Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

Ielts Essay - Who's a Good Parent Men or Women?

When it comes to deciding about who has the potential to be better at parenting, women, as per some conservationists, seem to be miles ahead of their men counterparts, but recent changes in the social roles have forced the social experts to look at this issue once again, with a new perspective.

Modern concept of parenting challenges the supremacy of women, in terms of rearing the children. Fathers, although traditionally have been known to don the roles of social coaches, helping to forge social relations, and emotional guides, teaching the children to deal with emotions – even scary sometimes, they have started performing even those duties, like changing diapers, with an equal finesse.

However, conventional definitions of roles of men and women, in a family, have existed ever since humans evolved on this planet, as hunters and food gatherers. Men were, more or less, concerned with looking for food, while women, donning the roles of rearing children. This role set has continued down the centuries, and perhaps also found its mention in many religious scriptures across the world. Many orthodox societies also define it as a law of nature, where women have been designated to take care of children.

Moreover, various psychological explanations also illustrate why women enjoy an upper hand, in the realm of parenting, over men. They are better equipped with setoff emotions and control mechanism that make them stand apart. Females use a mix of emotions, aggression and strategies to educate, play, monitor and control juveniles. Youngsters quite often find it easier to connect with their mothers since the latter happen to be the first teachers who communicate with kids through linguistics and affection.

In the nutshell, even though both the perspectives hold great substance in their own virtue, I feel that both genders have similar expertise when it comes to rearing offpsring, especially in the modern times.   

Many parents use punishment to teach the different between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is unnecessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many parents use punishment to teach the different between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is necessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Punishment And Parenting

Parenting has always been a tricky job because it needs people to handle one of the most difficult beings on the planet, i.e. the children. This job can test the wits of parents especially when it comes to teaching the kids about differentiating between the good and bad. Involving some sort of punishment in teaching process is sometimes regarded as a critical component of parenting; however, critics despise this practice.

Juveniles are adventurous, immature and often prone to adopting ways of erratic behavior. Their inquisitive tender minds often lead them into exploring such activities and domains which should otherwise be avoided during growing years.  It is necessary to dissuade them from such expeditions and as per some parents, chastising is the best way is prevent the kids from taking up habits or involving themselves into such habits that have a potential of hampering their growth.

Furthermore, rebuke and reprimand have always been regarded as the short cuts to inciting discipline among the young ones. The fear of cane and verbal punishment have always deterred the growing kids from doing something over adventurous, and instead encouraged them to take up righteous path that is disciplined and fruitful. The kids disciplined at home are thought to grow up as those rational adults who know the difference between good and evil.

However, modern psychologists and social scientists disapprove and reject theory of rebuke. As per them, there is no place for punishment in a caring relationship and moreover, chastising can often result in severe consequences where the children either grow up as violent adults or take extreme steps in their growing years.

To sum up, I feel although the view of modern child psychologists holds true in contemporary era, traditional concept of upbringing cannot be completely overruled, making this practice relevant even today.  

Some people think parents should read or tell stories to their children, others say it is not important and can be replaced by watching TV and movies instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion. - IELTS Essay

 Some people think parents should read or tell stories to their children, others say it is not important and can be replaced by watching TV and movies instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.  

Ielts Essay Some people think parents should read or tell stories

Even though there has been a paradigm shift in the art of parenting when it comes to entertaining young ones, the practice of narrating tales has endured. However, an increasing number assert that this age-hold arrangement can be   superseded by modern means of leisure: TV and films, nonetheless I believe that the conventional method is irreplaceable.  

With the new media being available to entertain children with cartoon movies and other more informative programs and documentaries, many parents feel that the traditional story telling has lost its relevance because modern media always has fresh plots and new stories to narrate which attract and influence young ones more than those repetitive and age old narratives which were once a routine in the parent child interaction.

Nevertheless, some sections feel that the traditional story telling can never be superseded by the newer channels of entertainment because both activities have different objectives. As per them, the television channels and children oriented movies are simple mediums of recreation whereas the stories narrated by mothers and fathers have a different objective because this assists in creating closer bonds between two generations.

Moreover, the old fables and stories which have been passed down the generations always have a positive impact on the mindset of children because each of these fables, legends and allegories carry references from the lives of great people who have lived in past and have pepetuated tales of bravery and great deeds to the next generations: all these depictions are educational and influence tender minds positively.

In conclusion, substituting the conventional practice of story telling with state-of-the-art means of narration is impossible and it will be carried down the generations forever. Its influence will endure infinitely despite advancements in technology.  

With changing times, the concept of parenting has also undergone a rapid transformation: many have started using alternative mediums to entertain their wards; they do not think anymore that telling them stories holds any relevance because the latter have access to other mediums of entertainment including movies and television programs, but there are those who feel that traditional story narration is irreplaceable.