As public safety is one of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test on the animals first new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To What extent do you agree or disagree?

 As public safety is one of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test on the animals first new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To What extent do you agree or disagree?

Contemporary times have witnessed groundbreaking discoveries, primarily in medicine and other lifestyle products,  most of which have been first tried on animals. This fact has irked many animal right activities, who treat such a move with indignation, but there is a lobby that lends its support to this experimentation.   

A sizable lobby opines that of products on animals is important because the physiology of certain mammals is similar to humans; therefore, it aids scientists to develop various drugs and treatments which are crucial in saving or safeguarding the lives of people from fatal diseases such as HIV, cancer, and deadly tumours; in turn, incumbent for improving the overall quality of life. Moreover, trying out new products on animals is imperative so that they can be checked for any side effects they could jeopardize human safety. 

This can be exemplified by quoting the revelations of several researches that state that there is a conspicuous decline in the number of deaths among females due to introduction of animal experimentation in the field of cosmetics, which was earlier very high owing to high ammonia content present in it.

However, critics are up in arms against this practice. They profoundly feel that this is an injustice being meted out to the poor beings like rodents, guinea pigs and monkeys, to invent or innovate. Countless  animals which are subjected to painful procedures either perish during the process, or are condemned to lead a painful life, in captivity, suffering from deformities due clinical trials.  

Overall, I opine that despite certain advantages attributed to carrying out the animal trials, it is very unethical and immoral and must be discouraged promptly. There is a need to adopt a humane attitude towards those sharing space with mankind on this planet.

As public safety is one of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

As public safety is one of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay - Cruelity on Animal 

Off late as the animal lovers have been raising their pitch against use of animals being used as test beds for medicines and cosmetics, various sections of the society have been at poles. Some feel this is testing on animals is sheer cruelty, while others think that there is nothing wrong in this.

Activists vouching for animal rights feel that testing impact of medicines and other substances is unethical since this involves subjecting poor animals to the trauma of sickness and disease. It is quite cruel to put lives of animals in danger for the sake of humans.  

However, testing on animals has been going on since a long time, and the animals used for experiments are not on the endangered list, but ones that perish or are killed, each year, by use of rat poison, rat traps, etc. Several million humans owe their lives to the successful lab simulations on the animals. The effectiveness and safety of use of such formulations were actually proven by these very tests.

Similarly, scores of medicines and surgical procedures have been perfected with the help of lab testing on the rats and mice. Although nowadays scientists are happy carrying out tests on simulated environment of computers, it is impossible to test use and effectiveness of pacemakers, reattaching severed limbs and procedures like kidney and heart transplants on virtual environment. All of these processes were actually tested and perfected in clinical trials. Without using animals for testing formulations or procedures for effectiveness and safety, the medical field would come to a standstill and jeopardize lives of millions of patients waiting desperately for some respite from their medical conditions.

To conclude, I feel that there is nothing wrong in carrying out experiments  on animals for sake of saving humans lives.