In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievements. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high level of personal achievements is possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail, according to their individual merits. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievements. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high level of personal achievements is possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail, according to their individual merits. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay Achievements in various social settings 

There is a great debate nowadays over whether the attainments of people are better in social settings that promote equality, or in a set-up where the people are exposed to the risk of set-backs, however, personally feel that people who are capable, can excel in both kinds of social arrangements.

It is a general belief that people who are exposed to the likelihood of failing, excel in any task they undertake.  Such people, when standing face to face with a debacle, tend to be creative, and use every possible method to overcome challenges. This helps bring out the best out of individuals who relentlessly pursue success and infuse innovation; thereby setting benchmarks and becoming role models for the rest of the society. History has been a witness that people, like Abraham Lincoln who took initiative on their own and without any support of any kind succeeded in bringing around revolutions.

It is generally believed that people tend to attain better in a social setting that promotes equality among classes. Such an arrangement guarantees appropriate support to all citizens, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds. The assistance rendered by the state in form of opportunities, funding and logistics helps ease up the worries of the people and afford them time to focus on critical areas of work and field of interest. When there are opportunities galore for everyone and free of any discrimination, people have the freedom and the time to determine their strength areas and natural inclination, where they can focus without inhibitions. This makes them excel in their pursuits.

To conclude, after assessing both the points of views, it can be clearly said that achievements are achievements and cannot be compared, and people can excel in both kinds of social settings.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievements. Some people that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high level of personal achievements is possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail, according to their individual merits. To what extent do you agree or disagree? -Ielts Essay

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievements. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. What are the advantages and disadvantages of  having such a society? Discuss both views, and give your views. 

Egalitarian Society - Ielts Essay

Humans have always lived at poles, when it comes to deciding about the parameters to guide the character of the social set-up. Where some profess that it is necessary to follow principles of egalitarianism, and treat every human in same manner, others vehemently defend the freedom of offering chances based on the qualities of individuals.

“God has made everyone equal”, so the humans have no right of creating divisions. It is believed that gauging merits of individuals on certain parameters, defined by humans, is quite outrageous since this kind of system prevents society from harnessing the usefulness of each individual. “Everybody has a genius directed to a specific direction, and telling a fish to climb a tree is quite unjustified, but if it given an opportunity to prove its prowess at swimming, it would surely excel”. Similar is the case when it comes to providing openings and chances to humans; robbing them of chances when they could have excelled in other areas would be unjust.

However, applying same yardstick to measure performers and non-performers is quite an impractical suggestion. After all, the future of a society cannot be compromised just for the sake of offering equal opportunities – regardless of the performance achieved. History has been a witness that wherever such principles have been followed, the society has witnessed erosion of creamy layer as the intelligent people have migrated to other countries – resulting in brain drain.  Such societies, as a result, have accrued an irrevocable and insurmountable loss of talent. Moreover, this system would fuel confusion and make people completely dependent on the government assistance, thereby killing creativity.

Overall, I strongly feel that harping proposals of providing equal opportunities to the achievers and under-performers is highly impractical and prove  counterproductive in long run.