Subjects at schools are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Subjects at schools are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

A meticulously  curated study plan plays a vital role in the  holistic development of learners, and this responsibility has traditionally been shouldered by state-backed bodies due to the uniformity it renders. However, some suggest that such an initiative should be handed over to the educators, but I disagree with this view and lend my support to the continuation of the current system.   

Teachers usually have time constraints as a virtue of myriads of reasons: completion of the syllabus, preparing pupils for both interschool, as well as intraschool competitions, maintaining administrative records, and to name a few, and meanwhile, if such work were allotted to them, this would affect the teaching-learning process. In addition, due to lack of updated data and handouts, there will be complete failure to sensitize the creative minds.

Moreover, there will be major variations in syllabus, and learning methods, in many regions across institutions within the nation, hampering the future goals, and career opportunities, of young learners in higher education, and professions. For example, if schools do not impart computer science, and artificial intelligence at the school level since some educators failed to determine its relevance, learners may encounter challenges in enrolling in their dream jobs.

Furthermore, some invest their complete faith in national authorities, by virtue of them being equipped with the sufficient dexterity , and resources to provide standardized education. Likewise, the policy makers can decide to incorporate several subjects based on future economic demands that will not only help futuristic expertise but also render a clear direction to the young generation.  

In conclusion, although educators are the main source of delivering lessons, and comprehending the needs of their students better, to maintain consistency and fairness in the education, the onus of defining the formal syllabus should remain with central organisations.

Subjects at schools are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree. Give reasons and examples.

Subjects at schools are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree. Give reasons and examples.

IELTS ESSAY WHO SHOULD CHOOSE SUBJECTS 

Over several years of last century, as the education system has evolved radically, central educational authorities are vested  with the task of defining academic curriculum. This system has umpteen merits, but some criticize this procedure, and feel that educators must be take onus of this task. 

To start with, those strongly supporting this arrangement profess that the tutors are closer to the pupils and have a better access to their intelligence levels. This first-hand information about the level of comprehension can help them in deciding the areas that can be easily grabbed by the learners, as per their aspirations, and also aid in bolstering their skills.

Having said that, those cynical about this defy this notion overtly, and vouch for the national authority deciding the study programs, quote that every country faces a steep challenge of harmonizing academic disciplines and syllabus across the nation, within single grid, to help assess and evaluate the intelligence of learners on the basis of single criteria list. This can help engender a strategy to develop a comprehensive education system that is offers equal opportunities to all pupils, but educators lack an in-depth view about heterogenic geographical socioeconomic backgrounds and requirements of the populace

Additionally, teaching professionals lack access to broader perspectives and abundance of resources that can help devise and develop such study material that can assist greatly in enhancing the knowledge of future generations at par with updated trends and developments. In contrast, a national educational body can effortlessly attain this goal.  

In overall analysis, I feel that it is better for a central agency to take care of establishment of curriculum as it helps in ensuring a reliable and comprehensive system that not only guarantees delivery of standardized education but also ensures a better evaluation system.