As there is increasing unemployment in the world, while at the same time those who have jobs are working harder and harder, it would be better to have a four-day working week for everyone, and so to create more jobs. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

 As there is increasing unemployment in the world, while at the same time those who have jobs are working harder and harder, it would be better to have a four-day working week for everyone, and so to create more jobs. In what extent do you agree or disagree?      

 In the wake of rising joblessness, many are trying to find appropriate remedies to this, one of suggestions includes shrinking the working week to four days. The supporters of this thought feel this may help create more jobs though there are voices of dissent on this proposal. 

 This proposal of incorporating a shorter working week, that is of four days, finds its support in the assumption that under such settings the businesses will be forced to hire additional personnel to compensate for day offs of current work force,  and complete the work, in order to sustain operations and meet deadlines. Such a move would render opportunities to others in need of work to get jobs,  thus bringing down the number of jobless individuals.

However, a great skepticism is being expressed about this scheme: many feel such an arrangement  will prove to be counterproductive  since the dearth of employment  is not a deliberate creation but an aftermath of economic down turn, and enforcing such an ambitious plan, will instead exacerbate the situation of unemployment by making organizations vulnerable to losses, by virtue of paying more money for the same amount of work.  

 Moreover, many feel that the desired outcome, creation of more jobs, may not be achieved, the employers may instead resort to increasing the number working hours on other days to offsetting the  impact of a shorter working week schedule. It seems quite viable that managements of organizations will hardly plan more appointments when they are deriving adequate outputs from the existing work strength.

 In conclusion, I feel this idea lacks substance and  is a recipe for disaster. Many organizations are already finding it hard to optimize their cost of operations  due to dwindling revenues, and such a move may do more harm than good.

As there is increasing unemployment in the world, while at the same time those who have jobs are working harder and harder, it would be better to have a four-day working week for everyone, and so to create more jobs. In what extent do you agree or disagree?- Ielts Essay

As there is increasing unemployment in the world, while at the same time those who have jobs are working harder and harder, it would be better to have a four-day working week for everyone, and so to create more jobs. In what extent do you agree or disagree? Ielts Essay 

 

  

Concerned at rising joblessness, economists and social scientists are becoming increasingly concerned and have been pitching for revolutionary ways mitigate this situation. They suggest that it would viable enough if personnel were obligated to work only for four days in a week, but some challenge this proposal.

 

To start with, those supporting the idea of reducing number of working days per week found their opinion on the assumption that by stipulating four-day week working per person, it would become mandatory for companies to hire more and more individuals, so as to help compensate for those on their rest days. On top of that, another benefit that can be supposedly be afforded by this policy is that those struggling to strike a work life balance due to gruelling professional schedule would be able to gain some time to rejuvenate and relax, augmenting their productivity as a consequence.     

 

On the contrary, some sections strongly reject this idea. As per them this will prove to be a recipe for disaster; it will impose an additional financial burden on employers, and afford an adverse impact on financial health of existing employment venues. The employment giving agencies will have to allocate extra resources as to pay for remuneration to new employees, bear additional tax burden and additional infrastructure costs to accommodate additional workers. Consequently, this is bound to shrink the capacity of businesses to sustain profitability in face of stiff market competition which could also result in closing down of businesses. This would further amplify miseries and engender more joblessness around.

Overall, disputes and controversies aside, I strongly reject this idea as enforcing a rule that stipulates personnel operating for four days in a week is quite impractical: as it may generate more serious complications and create more unemployed people.