It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Creating open air spaces such as green areas and other public domains in urban locales is mandatory, as per some. This proposal needs a deeper analysis to assess whether it is acceptable, or not.
Open areas such as gardens and parks help urbanites in numerous ways; for instance, increasing the concentration of oxygen, and mitigating pollution caused by industries and expanding population. This could help alleviate levels of harmful toxins in the air. Besides this, these locations could also afford people a chance to exercise, improving their well being as a consequence. Additionally, these also behave as recreational areas for children, affording them space to play in and enjoy the years of their childhood, encouraging them to engage in outdoor endeavors instead of staying indoors. Apart from that, such areas could be utilized to generate revenue by building some eye-catching figures and rides, creating opportunities for leisure.
On the other hand, a few argue with the fact of having such large lands wasted, and could be utilized in a better way, by building more houses for the increasing population of the world. They term this suggestion is sheer squandering of invaluable real estate, something that is in scarcity in cities. Implementing this arrangement will send land prices shooting through the roof, making it hard for many urban dwellers to afford living and working spaces, encouraging urban sprawl as a result, and spreading pollution and ecological disasters beyond the outskirts of the already congested urban locales.
To conclude, even though the critics have some valid concerns, large places such as parks have their benefits and are crucial for improving the quality of city life. Therefore, I concur with this proposed policy.
