Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?
Some sections are of the view that young individuals must work towards their goals and also step out of their comfort zone to achieve them, while others are averse to this as this entails enduring hardships, and thus dissent with this notion. This matter needs to be critically analyzed.
To begin with, a lobby propounds that having inclination towards some ambition can help create awareness about the new developments in the surroundings as well as one can gain knowledge about their domain. To exemplify this, many topnotch scientists agree that while working hard in their field, they encompassed new technologies which helped them to incorporate them to make several novel inventions, especially artificial intelligence, and fetch them popularity.
Moreover, to realize aims, one is persuaded to think out of the box and involve themselves to be more creative, setting them apart from others, and hence, making them experience the exploits of their hard work not only in financial but also in professional terms. For instance, M.S Hussain, a renowned artist, admits that those like him who have experimented with their own work, with a desire to usher radical changes, bring updated versions of their masterpiece, making them more innovative, and churn out exquisite artwork.
However, some fear that following this strategy, and dread defining aims; this would afford depression and demotivation, and thus, expose them to physical and mental afflictions. Furthermore, by virtue of not being triumphant, they will have to detach themselves from their social circles and resign into oblivion, condemning themselves to isolated dungeons of misery.
In hindsight, disputes aside, I vehemently opine that one has to seriously get familiar with the practice of settling for certain ambitions to help them realize their true potential and learn to surmount challenges.
