Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Are outstanding players justified in their multitude of earnings?
Yes? Why
They forgo their comfort and make sacrifices for sustaining their forms
They are a part of the volatile profession: going out of form and an injury can end their careers abruptly
Their careers span over a decade and a half - after which they must switch their professions
They raise the stakes of the nation on the global level with their sterling performances, and improve opinion about society, it being caring for its people.
They motivate millions to take up healthy regimes and some to take up sports as careers
They are a critical component of an industry that is generating employment for millions and business worth billions; and governments also gross revenues through taxes imposed on resulting activities.
Consumer companies gross huge revenues: in tune of billions by using their popularity, what is wrong in the earnings of these people
No? Why
Other occupations are more important and pivotal to society: teachers, researchers, soldiers, doctors-they also devote their dreams and life to the good of society, then why they should not be paid.
The astronomical compensation of accomplished sports practitioners has been under critical scanner by virtue of many terming it as warranted, and others considering it as an injustice meted out to those in other occupations.
There is strong support for the sky-high earnings of outstanding players; they are working in a volatile occupation where their place and performance depends on their form and fitness. To sustain this, they must relentlessly subject themselves to physical and mental hardships, and during the course, they must also make sacrifices, in terms of their personal and social life and comforts. Similarly, they are also exposed to the risk of going out of form, or injuries, which can bring their careers to an abrupt halt, leaving them with little resources to earn their livelihood. Additionally, one can hardly ignore the fact that their shelf life spans over a decade and half, after which, they must switch professions, where a similar success is not guaranteed. Therefore, the notion behind their astronomical compensations being justified seems quite viable.
Nonetheless, the other lobby is quite critical of such a gap: they feel that those employed in other occupations work equally hard and sometimes, even devote their life to the cause of society; however, they never get their dues and some are found struggling to make their ends meet. For instance, doctors first commit umpteen years to gain qualification, and thereafter they use all their talent to save the lives of the ailing. Similarly, soldiers and law enforcement officers risk their lives for the sake of society, but rarely are acknowledged for their contribution. As per this lobby, this difference should be blurred.
Overall, even though it is true that other people engaged in occupations other than sports should also get their due, the salaries of established sports professionals are quite appropriate, for they make an unprecedented contribution to society.
