The international community must take immediate action to ensure all countries reduce their usage of fossil fuels.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
A general perception is emerging among environmentally conscious people that the international organisation should take steps to curb the consumption of propellants like gasoline and diesel, universally. I partially disagree with this proposal and shall discuss in the following paragraphs.
To start with, a lobby feels that these naturally occurring minerals are soon going to exhaust due to greed and reckless milking, turning the future of upcoming generations bleak as they might not have the privilege to avail these materials. Moreover, their rampant use is causing a colossal spike in the release of carbon dioxide into the air, precipitating detrimental effects on the environment: promoting global warming, and human health by making them vulnerable to respiratory disorders, like asthma, lung infection, and many more. In Japan, to corroborate, the incidence of these ailments has swelled, owing to surfeit use of fossil fuel-driven vehicles.
Having said that, many believe that this may be impossible, for there are regions where these act as a single source of energy. For example, in Siberia, due to immense cold throughout the year, everyday life hinges on petrol: generating electricity, transportation, and so forth, since other forms of fuel are not available. This pushes them to utilize the only medium accessible at hand. Similarly, through petroleum, many forms of by-products are made: jet fuel, vaseline, fertilizers, and diesel, opening doors to a wide variety of commodities and fulfilling the needs of society at large.
In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, I believe that there should be a cap on the usage of fossil fuel, but repercussions of such an endeavor should be carefully weighed before implementing it; many regions have this fuel as a single source to bolster their lives.
