Some people prefer to do the same type of work all their lives, while others enjoy changing the work they do. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been an eternal debate about altering routines, or not: while some prefer to integrate modifications, others dread this. This essay will discuss both sides and share a plausible opinion.
To start with, a lobby asserts that indulging into a similar routine of work alleviates mistakes. This is to say, when one follows a similar pattern day in, day out, they tend to make fewer errors, and hence, make themselves confident. Such habitual working encourages one to hone their specific skillset, fetching them adroitness in whatever they do, and turning them into seasoned individuals, whereas embracing changes might expose them to failure and incessant struggles. This pattern is generally witnessed among the aging workforce, for a majority feels that continuing with something they have been practising over the years can earn them finesse, turning them into specialists, instead of pushing them to slog to grab new skills and face setbacks.
Having said that, many feel that doing different work every day brings thrill and excitement that goes missing while pursuing mundane tasks in offices. Moreover, doing something differently is also considered to be a key factor in earning success in the dynamic world, bringing them closer to betterment and helping them chart a course to desired attainments. One can ascend the ladder of growth by trying out jobs that fit their lifestyle, ambitions and career prospects. For example, in Japan, many keep on looking to change their professions to find where they would like to stand in life.
In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, in my opinion, even though both perspectives hold substance, while the older individuals prioritizing sticking to old routines, and younger seek enhancements, the latter view is more feasible for those seeking achievements.
