More and more people are getting overweight. Some people think the government should increase the price of fattening food items to solve this problem. Do you agree or disagree?
Assumption (would) if such an action taken,
- It will dissuade consumers from opting for such things and they will have to settle for cheaper but healthier options or home cooked meals
- Manufacturers will reduce the amount of fat being used in producing food items
Why this action should not be taken
- Blaming food will not alleviate the problem
- It is not the food but the sedentary lifestyles that is cause of this issue so, the state must ensure that this is taken care of effectively
- People will not abandon consumption to these items: they are forced to do so because of their overwhelming engagement with their professional and academic pursuits. Therefore, the state must focus on providing relief to people from their over-draining schedules so that people can get some time to cook rather than buy food.
- They should instead promote active lifestyles
- They should instead persuade the manufacturers to reduce the fat content in their produce.
Obesity is menacing the future of society. This has prompted some to suggest that the state should intervene and make edible items that are laden with fat content, costlier to mitigate this health condition. However, others voice their dissent on this issue.
This suggestion is founded on an assumption that expensive fattening nourishment will force people to opt for other more healthier options since such alternatives will either go out of the reach of a majority of consumers, especially youngsters, or will provide little motivation to consume such products since these items will cost as much as pricey healthy food. Most of the time people are seen consuming such items since these either are quite economical to afford, or are cashing on the desires to evade the struggle of cooking at home. However, this action will compel many to reconsider their options in favor of appropriate nutrition.
Nevertheless, others suggest a more practical approach and are critical of this one. They predict that this policy is highly unlikely to obliterate corpulence since consumption of edible goods loaded with fat is a compulsion rather than a matter of voluntary choice. Most are pushed into buying such things: they have overwhelming work schedules and are exhausted by the time they reach home, leaving them with little energy to think about preparing healthy meals. Moreover, it is the sedentary lifestyle from where this issue stems and not what people consume. Therefore, the state must promote healthy lifestyles and also persuade manufacturers to use healthy ingredients, instead of resorting to such impractical methods.
Overall, the proposed policy of price hike of edible products that carry surfeit fat seems to be lacking in substance. Governments must act pragmatically and instead of punishing citizens, they should look for more viable options.
