Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence will increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The death sentence has long been a contentious issue, with arguments for and against its necessity in maintaining societal order and preventing criminal endeavors of violent nature. Some argue that it is critical for deterring such offenses, while others question its relevance.
Supporters of the death penalty emphasize its deterrent value. They believe that the existence of such an irreversible penalty discourages potential offenders from committing grave offenses like murder and terrorism. For example, countries such as Saudi Arabia, which has enforced strict statutes of putting perpetrators of brutal acts to death, report relatively low rates of illegal acts of savagery. Advocates also argue that it ensures justice by delivering the ultimate punishment to partakers of the most heinous acts, thereby providing consolation to victim families. Furthermore, they highlight its role in reinforcing public confidence in the legal system by ensuring severe consequences for grave violations.
Opponents, however, challenge the efficacy of this arrangement, in mitigating acts of barbarity. Studies from countries like Canada and Germany, which have abolished this penalty, show no significant increase in unlawful undertakings that cause physical harm. Critics argue that other factors, unless education and socioeconomic development proliferate to every section of society, such deviant behaviour cannot be curbed. Similarly, not every offender breaks a certain law deliberately because inherent animal tendency makes humans incapable of controlling themselves. Therefore, unless such individuals are trained to control their emotions, no severity of punishment can incite fear among offenders.
In conclusion, while condemning to the gallows for unlawful undertakings intending harm to victims is viewed as necessary for ensuring public safety, some see it as an outdated and flawed practice. Its effectiveness as a deterrent remains inconclusive. I feel that such awards must be handed over discreetly where antisocial elements are irredeemable.
