Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion

 Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Why Schools

1. Schools can handle such important areas very carefully and effectively - by designing appropriate courseware, arranging resources like faculty and teaching about technical aspects of this process - which will help convince young minds about the relevance of this process. 

2. Schools are vested/ given with the obligation /duty  of polishing the personalities of children - recycling is likely to become an important trait of personalities of rational adults, it should be fostered during formative years. 

3. They learn better in a formal environment, among their peers, and also grab the content clearly which is retained longer

Why Parents 

1. Parents are role models for their wards and the latter follow the footsteps and precedents set by the former without questioning: What parents will do will automatically be grasped by the latter. 

2. This skills is better learnt in practical environment and this can be rendered easily by families

3. Adding one more subject to curriculum will be useless as environmental engineering and geography are already taught in schools 

4. This will impose an unnecessary burden on tender minds, and will be deprived of any free time left with them

When it comes to preparing the young generation to embrace recycling:a pivotal component of environment protection, society finds itself at poles by deciding about who should take the onus of this task, families or formal tuition. I feel this process enjoys monumental significance, and thus, should be a joint responsibility.

The view of the section rallying behind schools donning the mantle about disseminating knowledge about reprocessing household waste and redundant goods, hinges on the fact that these institutions play a dominant role in carving the overall personality  of youngsters, helping them grow up as rational and well-informed adults, empathetic towards the surroundings, and since this endeavor is a vital element of any plans aimed that sustaining the planet that also require individual intervention, education about this subject should be imparted in classrooms during formative years. 

Similarly, these establishments boast of versatile expertise, and experience,  in designing curriculum and (ancillary) support activities to ensure the effective delivery of content related to such complex and critical topics, and also monitor how well young people have been able to absorb the knowledge by testing the latter, through written and practical exams. Thus, they should take ownership in this undertaking.

Nevertheless, mothers and fathers cannot escape (circumvent) this obligation since they are the role models for their wards: the latter have profound (unflinching)  trust on the former and  tend to follow the precedents without questions and reluctance. To corroborate, if elders of the family abstain from imprudent practices like wasting food, electricity and money, the young ones also emulate such habits.

In hindsight, the burden of negotiating such an essential task cannot be vested on one party, owing to the importance it carries for the planet, as well as mankind: concerted efforts would produce an enlightened future generation.

Safety standards are important when building peoples’ homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people who build the homes?

Safety standards are important when building peoples’ homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people who build the homes?

Nowadays, a school of thought suggests that governments should take the ownership to ensure application of appropriate safety norms when building residential, while others do not support the former view and say this should be done by those who build houses. 

To start with, many believe that governments should take the responsibility for ensuring compliance with safety standards while constructing units because they have resources and power to do so. Lawmakers have resources such as expertise to define conventions that can provide definitions of safeguards for dwelling units. Apart from this, as they have the authority to implement such rules and making it sure that everyone follows them without given a second thought, all tend to fall in line and adopt compulsory norms to avoid the consequences such as penalties and punishments. 

Moreover, a lobby comments that it is the responsibility of policy makers to afford the safety to taxpayers by adopting necessary steps. They say that at the time of natural calamities the public faces umpteen difficulties and lives under the risk of losing valuable things and even lives, which can force lawmakers to compensate for losses.  

However, on the other side of the coin, some say that structure and safety codes should be controlled by those who engage in construction endeavors since they are the ones who are available on the location at the time of construction. They  are well aware of material being used and will be directly impacted if some mishaps occur due to substandard construction quality. 

Overall, I believe that governments should don the mantle when it comes to making sure that residential building by-laws are strictly adhered to since they can negotiate this task more effectively.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

Nowadays, a majority of urbanites prefer residing in sprawling gated  societies housing accommodation blocks as this affords them umpteen benefits, but this also has some drawbacks. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will analyze both sides of the coin and conclude if the former outstrip the latter. 

To start with, life in such surroundings delivers unprecedented convenience, by virtue of numerous essential facilities beingI'm accessible within the vicinity of the premises such as parking and shopping. For example, it has been seen that people are found struggling to park their vehicle outside the building due to security issues, but gated  areas can afford. unparalleled security due to round  the clock surveillance to prevent crimes. Moreover,  one does not have to leave their society to shop for their needs since these locations are populated with outlets selling a myriad of everyday use goods. In addition, one can get the opportunities to celebrate festivals and events together, such as birthday parties and wedding occasions. They do not have to worry about booking the additional spaces and spending money on party halls.

However, it is common for residents of such residential units to be exposed to hardships faced while renovating the exteriors and interiors of their living spaces because every alteration requires permissions from the society management, and sometimes, even after due investigation, the approval might not be granted. Moreover, it is hard for households in such accommodation to sustain their privacy; they must always maintain low levels of noise to ensure that their neighbors do not face inconvenience.   

Overall, I strongly believe that selecting an apartment always varies on the budget and the preferable facilities, but the upsides of this style of living, extending every imaginable facility,  easily exceed the shortcomings that can be surmounted by adopting prudent measures. 

Recently, teenagers have not been following rules and their parents’ advice. Is this good or bad?

 Recently, teenagers have not been following rules and their parents’ advice. Is this good or bad?

In concurrent times, umpteen adolescents are becoming more aggressive  towards making decisions in their life on their own. In the following paragraphs, I intend to delve deeper and consider various factors before deciding whether this conduct is favorable, or unfavorable.

To start with, teenagers can turn themselves into independent and self-sufficient personalities, capable of developing critical thinking skills and ability to make unfettered decisions. This can be helpful for their personal growth and intellectual  development. Overlooking rules and advice from elders can allow them to explore their values, preferences and beliefs on their own, letting them adapt to changing times rapidly and responsibly, and use their innate instincts for the potential benefits.

However, not following rules and advice of the elders might lead to risky behavior, such as engaging in dangerous activities, or poor academic performance. Also, Some rules are in place for legal and safety reasons, and disregarding them can lead to negative consequences, including legal trouble, or physical harm. To corroborate, a recent spurt in cases of vandalism and incidence of shop-lifting, across the world, is attributed to those aged from thirteen to eighteen. 

Similarly, while challenging norms is valuable, completely disregarding advice could mean missing out on important life lessons that adults are trying to impart based on their experiences. Moreover, the approach could strain their relationships with parents, friends and relatives. It has been seen that such young individuals often grow up as being detached from their loved-ones, leading a life that does not comply with social norms.   

Overall, despite outcomes of this context completely depending on the behavior and attitude of teens, this attitude can be deemed as positive. But, I do feel discussion between parents, and teenagers is the key to navigate complex terrain. 

People who decide on a career early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 People who decide on a career early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary times, many start working in their chosen occupation early on, and continue working in the same, for they feel this can bring rich dividends than those switching jobs frequently. The following paragraphs will analyze this notion and reach a plausible conclusion.

To start with, a school of thought believes those choosing their occupation in the initial stages of their working  are more likely to develop expertise in the related areas, and hold a better sense of stability. Adding on, they also have the tendency to build long term rapport in the organization; they are recognised by their colleagues and management. To exemplify, in a recent study conducted by the management department of The Times of Canada, those joining trades, such as  finance and accounts, as quite young and continuing with it life long, foster  specialization that turns them into experts in the related  realm.

However, there are others who believe in hopping employment and even professions since it helps them upgrade their skill set overall, and make their resume versatile. This can help them enrich their expertise in diverse domains, build industry networks, and earn a chance for rapid progression to higher posts. For instance, in a recent interview conducted by The Business Times, The CEO of American Express mentioned that he worked for different departments such as marketing, finance and sales before achieving this position. Likewise, this can fetch economic benefits: one can get better appraisals in terms of overall remuneration, like salaries,  bonuses, and so on.

To conclude, even though embracing an occupation while one is young and continuing working in it can afford a stable and satisfying experience, I feel that, in many cases, job hopping can be a wise decision. 

Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play at home and play Until they are six or seven years old. others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play at home and play Until they are six or seven years old. others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible.  Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

Why people want to their children to stay at home upto 6 or 7 years 

• Children are in growing years and need to develop emotionally and also forge trust with their parents which can only be done if they are only exposed to their families 

• They are vulnerable and cannot fend for themselves without the help of their parents

• They are going to face pressures of studies or professional obligations throughout their lives, so why to subject them to the torment of being away from family - even if for a half day - so early.

Why people want to send their children to schools as quickly as possible 

• Youngsters  learn to interact with the outer world quickly and also gain important skills. This acts as a replacement for the parents who are mostly engaged in work today 

• This can also help working parents to stay carefree and without worries about the safety of their children since they do not have entrust the safety of their wards to baby sitters 

• This can help channelise energy and curiosity in the right direction  and children can gain constructive abilities 

• Even in cases where one of the parents are at home, do not need to look after all the time since children spend almost half a day at school 

In contemporary times, a school of thought  suggests that youngsters should begin schooling only after they attain the age of 6, or 7, while others are in favor of education commencing as soon as possible. The following paragraphs shall discuss both the aspects logically and share a plausible opinion. 

To start with, parents nowadays are more concerned about the well-being of their wards, and thus, want the latter to be at home  until they grow old enough to fend for themselves,  as it is believed exposure to strangers and others around could be harmful for young minds. In the growing stage, little ones are expected to interact more with their families as it helps them to develop emotional connection with them. Additionally, starting studies  at an early age can make tender minds susceptible to stress. According to a survey published  by "The Times"  in countries like the USA 65 percent of parents were not in favor of early schooling as they favored carefree life for their young ones for another one or two years.  

Nevertheless, some are in favor of the phase of formal education commencing as early as possible, for this can help youngsters to channelise their energy and curiosity in the right direction, sharpening their minds as a result.  As per scientific studies,  inquisitiveness juveniles peaks at 4 and 5, and whatever they grab in this phase endure lifelong. Moreover, exposure to school at an early age would help them become more familiar with the education system and enable them to expand their learning abilities. It is proposed by several educationalists that an early beginning in education affords leverage to young minds over their counterparts starting later. 

Overall, it is true that safety is important, and thus, keeping children at home is necessary, but sending them to school at an early stage would be more beneficial for them; it will prepare them to face the outer world quickly

Some people say that playing sports helps to prepare children for their future work, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people say that playing sports helps to prepare children for their future work, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The debate over whether playing sports helps prepare children for their future is multifaceted with strong arguments on both sides, with some professing that this can infuse essential skills in young minds, while some defying this notion. 

Teamwork is a key takeaway of participating in sports that trains young minds about collaborating and communicating effectively, and achieving common goals - something critical for most professional environments. Additionally, this also fosters discipline; regular practice and commitments reflect the perseverance needed in the career; build stress management, and traits; youngsters learn to handle pressure and bounce back from setbacks, something invaluable in demanding job settings. 

Moreover, disciplines: football and cricket often require one to take leadership, especially those donning the roles of team captains by teaching them about decision making, motivating team members, and setting precedents for peers, directly correlating with managerial roles in the workplace. To corroborate, as per Dr. Nikita Duseja, an eminent Occupational Therapist in Toronto, most of those engaged in top management ranks in gigantic organizations admit developing traits required to take ownership, in their formative years by participating in sports. 

However, many argue that the benefits of sports are overstated when it comes to preparing juveniles for the future. They point out that these endeavors do not necessarily  provide technical and academic mastery required in most professions. For example, excelling in sports does not prepare children for tasks: data analysis, project management, or writing reports deemed critical in umpteen occupations. Above all, an excessive focus on sports might distract young-minds from academic achievements. 

In hindsight, while sports offer valuable life skills that can complement career preparation, they should be balanced with academic pursuits. Sports should enhance overall development, and not be the sole focus, to ensure  preparing youngsters for a successful adult life. 

Most people don’t care about environmental issues. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Most people don’t care about environmental issues. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Undeniably, the deteriorating conditions of the planet have caused an alarm, but some suggest that this does not translate into public awareness at large. I completely subscribe to this notion, and shall present justifications in the following paragraphs.   

This view is based on the traditional thought that still assumes that some tend to ignore major challenges facing the earth, and succumb to the temptation of experiencing luxuries laid at their disposal by technology and exploiting it despite it being detrimental to the surroundings. An increasing number of cars can be seen on roads as a few households buy more than two automobiles even for average-sized families, and run these, precipitating emissions from fuel, and eventually air pollution.  

Additionally,  some also postulate that the consumption of plastic bags is continuing unabated in spite of scientists and regimes consistently warning against the use of this material, and enlightening the populace about the ramifications the continued utilization of this substance, can have for the ecology, by virtue of these being non-biodegradable, and indestructible. 

However, all is not lost, although some areas still need to be addressed, more and more, especially the young generation is becoming extremely cautious about their interaction with nature. This deepening realization can be exemplified by surging sales of electric cars, and a growing number are prepared to buy these even if they are expensive. Similarly,  educational institutions, media coverage, and social media influencers have stirred interest among the populace, and many have started embracing greener ways: choosing eco-friendly products, reducing waste, and supporting green energy initiatives.

To conclude, although some sections of the population still tend to be apathetic towards the plight of the planet, they will soon be outnumbered by those well-informed about the worsening environment, and will follow the crowd.

Popular Hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashion than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

Popular Hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashion than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

Yes, the changes in the way people engage in leisure time endeavors mirrors fashion and prevalent trends? Why 

• Humans have a propensity to emulate each other, especially celebrities and rich: they want to be considered at par with such people 

• Some have a tendency to exhibit their affluence and being in sync with the what is in vogue 

• May want to do what their social or communal groups practice. 

• Many feel confident and up to date when they practice  a pastime that has fascinated many in contemporary times. 

No, the changes in the way people engage in leisure time endeavors does not elucidate  fashion and prevalent trends? Why 

• By all means, people are influenced by their own work routines and circumstances

• Availability of facilities, some have ceased to exist and others have become available

• Financial feasibility is more of a cause of changing pastime activities rather than prevalent fashion 

• The natural inclination is what is behind this, many are innovative and want to do something that has not been done yet. 

• Many people are fascinated by availability of fresh perspectives

Intro 1

As per the modern school of thought, the contemporary pastime endeavours highlight the prevalent vogue(fashion) rather than the individualistic approach towards using their free time, but this notion can be challenged on several grounds.

Intro 2

Many suggest that the contemporary pastime endeavours highlight the prevalent fashion rather than the individualistic approach towards using free time, but others dissent with it. The following paragraphs shall analyze this matter critically and share a plausible conclusion.

As per the modern school of thought, the contemporary pastime endeavours highlight the prevalent vogue rather than the individualistic approach towards using their free time, but this notion can be challenged on several grounds.

Those supporting this perception cite the rising instances of currently popularised free time haunts gaining subscribers by virtue of these being aggressively endorsed by celebrated personalities, and it is a human propensity to ape noted public figures, in order to gain similar acknowledgement from peers. To corroborate, several  participants in white water rafting in Colorado river, admit performing this activity  due to being inspired by film stars like Tom Cruise who featured in a documentary that covered this adventure sport.

Moreover, many embrace concurrent trends, in place of engaging with something that appeals to them; they do not want to be labelled old-fashioned, and intend to stay in sync with the present aspirations of their social groups or communities. The rising fame of international sports like cricket, and fading popularity of hockey in India, is a clear illustration of this tendency.

Nevertheless, despite this phenomenon gaining traction among some sectors of the populace, its reach is limited to the wealthy, the fashionable and youngsters; many regard the leisure undertakings as their personal prerogative, and realm, circumvent jumping into the bandwagon, and follow their own circumstances: budget, time, typical choices and abilities. They use these to relax and earn satisfaction, instead of competing with others, and letting current trends invade their personal spaces. For instance, traditional hobbies like gardening, reading, and so on, still have billions of followers.

Thus, disputes aside, although some have started integrating their free time pursuits with the currently accepted definition of hobbies, a majority remain unaffected, and still continue with their favourite recreational engagements, defying this notion.  

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?

Nowadays most information is available online, whereas in the past knowledge used to be stored in books and on paper. Do you think the advantages of this situation outweigh its disadvantages?

Benefits 

• Convenient: it allows one to store a huge amount of information  in a virtual compact space, not needing huge racks or libraries 

• Ease of access: 

• one can get inputs as per their choice, not needing to browse through books or pages 

• There is no need to carry the burden of books along. One only needs an internet connection  

• Virtually costfree, one can store up to certain amount of information without paying anything 

• Eco-friendly medium

Drawbacks 

• Prone to hacking: the incidence of this crime is on the rise

• Vulnerable to corruption if the host servers develop problems 

• There have been complaints of several platforms serving incorrect details 

• Poor network connections can make work difficult 

• All the data can be accessed through devices and prolonged exposure can hamper eyesight

• 
  
• 
  

  Introduction 1

Gone are the days when one had to face the torment of carrying and perusing books to grasp knowledge since the advent of virtual mediums has made life easier, but do the rewards afforded by this innovation really outstrip the challenges it poses, is a matter that needs to be profoundly analyzed.

Introduction 2

Undeniably, the advent of virtual mediums serving information has relieved one from the torment of carrying and perusing books to grasp  knowledge, but does this innovation afford more rewards than challenges: a matter that is worthy of profound analysis.  

At the outset, these modern repositories of content have liberated humans from the burden of bearing the heavy load of books, manuals, and so on, to access information about any topic: starting from highly technical journals to more mundane topics such as cooking guides, for everything can be derived with the help of computers, or even hand-held devices like mobiles. To corroborate, several professionals, including engineers, doctors, and those carrying out research in different fields, and pupils studying in schools or universities, have switched to e-manuals and ebooks, and animation and videos, to study, evaluate, and even expand their know-how.

Similarly, this introduction has proven its potential to act as a safeguard for the environment;neither one needs to strip the planet of the green buffer to produce paper nor there is requirement to use printing ink manufactured with the help of harmful chemicals to print. Additionally, governments and society can save invaluable monetary resources, otherwise invested into recycling printed material.

Nevertheless, the only pitfall of this state-of-the-art method of storing and disseminating informative and educational data, is its vulnerability to hacking and theft. However, this threat can be overcome by embracing appropriate protective measures, and framework, as several governments and other establishments have already started planning and implementing stringent data protection policies. 

In hindsight, online platforms acting as reservoirs, and source of knowledge, have come as a boon by offering unprecedented convenience of use, and halting environmental degradation caused by deforestation, and surpass the drawbacks emerging in the form of unsolicited intrusions.

Recently, teenagers have not been following rules and their parents’ advice. Is this good or bad?

Recently, teenagers have not been following rules and their parents’ advice. Is this good or bad?

Nowadays, it has been seen that teenaged juveniles are becoming prone to not following the suggestions from their elders; it is impacting their lifestyle in both positive and negative ways. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will analyze both sides of the coin and share my inclination.

To start with, a school of thought believes that sometimes adolescents following the self instincts and overlooking external interventions can result in positive outcomes and help carve out an independent personality by exploring and learning to make the decisions on their own, turning them into mature personalities. A survey carried out by the Central Board of Education found that, in 2022 more than 70% of teenagers in a classroom were deciding for themselves and handling several tasks independently such as preparing their timetable for daily routine, and so on. It was found that this attitude was more rewarding as the rest of 30% of those dependent on their parents required reminders to perform any academic activity.

However, the cynics believe that this propensity can expose teenage juveniles to a slew of chances of going astray easily since they are in the stage of transformation that will lead them to adulthood, neither they are children, nor they are grown ups, and due to lack of experience and maturity, they could be easily swayed by temptation, often leading them unwarranted circumstances. Youngsters between thirteen and seventeen are increasingly engaging in juvenile crimes  such as shoplifting and vandalism, to name a few. Moreover, they will also miss the chances to inherit the moral and ethical values of their parents. 

Overall, I believe that not following the suggestions from the parents can adversely affect the future of teenagers and also lead to troublesome consequences; thus, they should be counseled regularly for guidance. 

Some people say that playing sports helps to prepare children for their future work, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some people say that playing sports helps to prepare children for their future work, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Why do some feel that sports can help children prepare for their future work?

Why do some deny it?  

• Important life skills - how to work hard, carry themselves, take care of their belongings

• Learn about  Discipline and working within the norms 

• teamwork / perform individually and also ability to pursue goals alone or in team  

• Social skills 

• Using their leisure time productively instead of interacting with technology and  following a sedentary lifestyle 

• Physical and mental robustness 

• 
  

Why do others deny this? 

• It is just a leisure time activity for youngsters: an activity which only makes them create noise, exert on field, but as soon as they are off the field, they forget everything

• Academic and other curricular activities have greater relevance in their development 

Many perceive that sporting activities train juveniles for a successful adult life, whereas others reject this notion. The following paragraphs shall critically analyze this matter and emanate a justified conclusion.

Participating in sporting domains such as football, hockey, cricket and badminton, to name a few, tutor youngsters to lead a disciplined life since they must follow a strict regimen, in terms of diet, exercise and practice, along with following the rules and norms of the game, inculcating a propensity of regulating their behavior and routine. To exemplify, a study conducted to assess the impact of integrating sports in school curriculum on individuals across the world found that taking part in these endeavors in formative years influenced the conduct of individuals positively/ favorably that reflected in their interaction with surroundings while driving, waiting in queues, and so on.  

Similarly, partaking in these undertakings can foster a never say die attitude in growing minds and teach them never to surrender in the face of adversities, and instead strive to find ways to surmount challenges, and attain success. The key takeaway of doing individual, or team, sports gaining access to the knowledge of making strategies to win.

Nevertheless, those skeptical of these activities profess that it is hard for tender minds to absorb anything by running around and getting themselves dirty in the playing grounds since they are too naive to comprehend anything that is delivered without formal instructions, which can only be done by clear academic teaching. Nonetheless, this view lacks substance; growing curious minds can grasp even the subtle hints about various things and subjects.  

In hindsight, undeniably sports, in various manifestations/forms, equip young individuals with tremendously crucial traits that help them lead a life as law abiding citizens who never let defeats(debacles/setbacks) overwhelm them.   

Intro 1

There is a fierce debate over the usefulness of sporting activities for juveniles as some suggest that these train young minds for a successful adult life, whereas others think differently. This essay intends to analyze this matter critically before emanating a justified conclusion. 

Intro 2

Do sporting activities train juveniles for a successful adult life, or not, has ensued (triggered) a fierce debate as some support this notion, whereas others dissent with it. 

Intro 3  

Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. 

• Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. 

Why host global sporting carnivals 

• This is best of promoting sporting culture in the country: inspire locals to take up sports as a career, or follow it to lead a healthy lifestyle

• This can also assist in establishing sports as an industry that generates employment for millions, and business worth billions, and help governments gross huge revenues through taxes  

• This can put a country prominently on the global map, bringing tourists and also investors later 

Why these pose problems 

• The hosts have to spend extravagantly to organize such events, the debt created takes a long time to repay 

• Precious real estate must be converted into sporting facilities, which can never be used for other things, and these venues fall into disuse   

• The inhabitants of hosts cities face immense problems when preparations are going on, and also when games are progressing 

There is a fierce debate about hosting global sporting carnivals like olympics since some are quite enthusiastic about it, but others are against such programs, for they feel these can cause numerous problems.  

There  is large support for such events; these have the potential to promote an active sporting culture among the local populace. When natives, especially the youth, witness players from different parts of the world come and compete in a variety of sporting disciplines, in their own country, they get inspired to take up sports as their professional career, or at least healthy lifestyles. For instance, the Asian games of 1982 that were held in New Delhi were a turning point for India as millions of youngsters were persuaded to enroll for athletics, football, and so on, without the government needing to spend millions on promotional campaigns for sports. 

Similarly, these extravaganzas can aid in turning sports into a full-fledged industry that can generate direct and indirect employment for millions, across a cross-section of skills, and business worth billions, in domains, sometimes not even related to sports. Moreover, regimes also benefit from these activities, by virtue of them grossing huge revenues by taxing various activities related to this industry. 

However, the only objection raised by critics of such organisations, is that these can render precious urban land parcels useless as these cannot be re-assigned for other purposes, and often fall into disuse once the games are over, but this challenge can be surmounted by adopting prudent policy of making these locations accessible, and permitting local games and championship. 

In hindsight, I feel that the views of the skeptical lobby should be ignored in the larger public interest and the enduring benefits international sporting spectacles can bring around and promote healthy lifestyles and employment.

There is a fierce debate about hosting global sporting carnivals like olympics since some are quite enthusiastic about it, but others are against such programs, for they feel these can cause numerous problems. I will analyse this matter profoundly, and share a justified opinion.