Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Ielts Essay Joint Family or Nuclear one 

In contemporary times, when nuclear families are a norm of the day, many often profoundly argue whether rearing children in a nuclear family is worthwhile, or it is more useful to let them grow in an extended family. 

Raising young ones in an extended family carries numerous benefits, as many social theorists suggest. These kinds of  family settings allow the children to not only know their parents but also familiarize themselves with their grandparents, uncles, aunts, and their cousins. This helps foster cohesive family identity and also lets the young minds get acclimatized with the traditions and cultures that have been passed down the generations. Thus, assisting in perpetuation of customs and rituals. Several studies have shown, where young individuals grow in a joint family are more closely connected to and are enlightened about their roots.

Moreover, joint family arrangement affords better monitoring of the tender minds. Many a time, children need disciplining, and at times moral support which can be ill-afforded by couples living away from their joint family environment. When others seniors are there to observe and counsel, mothers and fathers rarely need to worry about as they go around fulfilling their professional and social obligations.

Nevertheless, many favor non-extended family settings. As per them, children  growing up in nuclear family set-up  stay emotionally connected to  their fathers and mothers. This generally is seen as highly beneficial during ageing, as youngsters appreciate their responsibilities towards their parents and are in a better state to render care for old during the twilight years of the latter.

To conclude, even though the decision of bringing up young ones in a joint family or a nuclear one relies completely on people involved or the circumstance, child rearing can become more effective the former settings.

We have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets. Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside the earth? What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examplea from your own knowledge and experience.

We have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets. 
Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside the earth? What 
would be the implications of proving that alien life exists?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

IELTS ESSAY Space in Life 

The idea of life beyond the hospitable conditions of the planet earth has never failed to intrigue humans. One wonders what will happen the day humans are able to actually discover life in the outer space. This has also prompted many to ponder about impact such a revelation might have on human life back home.

There is a great likelihood of finding signs of life in the outer space somewhere. This view is enthusiastically supported by unofficial reports of UFO sightings. Many are quite optimistic about the day when extraterrestrial beings making an appearance and establishing contact with humans. Even the SETI scientists are sure that there are certain planets with life supporting conditions revolving around their stars.

Discovery of life beyond the habitable environment of the blue planet may help humans interact with the far more intelligent civilizations that might transfer their know-how of handling problems, like environmental deterioration and pollution which happen to be a pressing problem for the human race today. They could also teach  how to survive a nuclear holocaust in case mankind resorts to the use of atomic weapons.

Conversely, some are cynical about the proposed benefits. They feel even if signs of alien life are found, there is no surety that it will positively impact humans since communicating in a vast space might take several light years; however, by then the mankind would have been stripped off invaluable financial resources which could have been used to mitigate several problems.

To recap, the optimism concerning discovering aliens carries substance, and I personally opine despite doubts/ cynicism coming in contact with extra terrestrial life forms would surely help drive home a plethora of unprecedented benefits. Hence, it would be quite rational to keep looking for life in the space.

Disruptive school students have an negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree and disagree give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience and knowledge. Write at least 250 word.

Disruptive school students have an negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree and disagree give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience and knowledge. Write at least 250 word.

Ielts Essay Disruptive Children 

It is a common notion that pupils with unruly behavior should be segregated and educated in a different group. This, as per many, can prove to be beneficial not only for themselves but also for others. However, others contest this and feel that this might result in unwarranted outcomes.

Ones vouching for  classifying learners as per their conduct feel that such an arrangement will ensure that students who are devoted to their academic pursuits would be spared of troubles – becoming victims of pranks and bullying – and disruptions caused by their disorderly classmates who do little but cause a chaos due to their unsettling attitude. Clubbing all troublemakers can prevent academic progress from being impeded, and afford a conducive learning environment.   

Moreover, it is rightly said, "One rotten  apple spoils the barrel". Grouping ill-mannered pupils seems to be a practical solution that could help prevent other learners from going astray and following the precedents of their fellow learners.  It has quite often been observed that young learners by virtue of being tender-minded, inexperienced,  and inquisitive are often overwhelmed by  naughty conduct that appeals them.  

Having said that, several child psychologists openly deride this proposal. They feel that a segregation would defeat the fundamental purpose of the education: polishing the personalities of the learners rather than magnifying the personality defects of the young ones. Formal tuition renders subtle hints to all by letting students observe conduct of disciplined students passively. Is such an suggestion sees the light of day this may brand many as troublemakers, thereby turning them rebellious.  

Hence, despite many lending support to classification of students, I strongly detest this. In my view, this proposal is fraught/ laden/ loaded with numerous inconsistencies, and would do more harm than good to the learners. Thus, it would be practical to put such  proposal in the cold storage.

A staggering amount of food is wasted every year, both in business and households. Why is this happening? What can be done to tackle this problem? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

A staggering amount of food is wasted every year, both in business and households. Why is this happening? What can be done to tackle this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Ielts Essay Trashing The Food 

A startling phenomenon is being observed today that an increasing amount of food is ending up in the trash cans instead of satisfying hunger. This new development has many experts scampering for the root cause, as well as the practical way outs.

The most prominent of the causes behind this phenomenon is the indifferent attitude of buyers for whom shopping for things including eatables has become a desirable pastime. Whenever they visit markets and stores, they end up shopping mindlessly, and food being the cheapest and the most important merchandise always tops the shopping priorities. These items don the shelves and the racks of the household kitchens and refrigerators until they are spoiled or pass their expiry dates.

Moreover, consumer companies involved in selling edible goods are also partially responsible for this rising dumping of food. In order to establish their image as once selling high grade goods, especially fruits and vegetables, they tend to only select those individual pieces that have perfect shapes and are blemish less besides being in perfect color. Due to this the businesses discard even the slightly discolored, deformed and bearing a few marks without giving a second thought.

Nevertheless, this challenge can be surmounted by adopting certain prudent steps, like creating food banks and encouraging people and the organizations to donate the unwanted food for the good of the society, especially for the impoverished and the destitute. This way not only the have nots would get their nourishment but it would also prevent a critical resource from ending up in the landfill sites.

Hence, it is true that consumerism is fuelling  wasteful habits, people and businesses can be convinced to make a better use of the extra food they buy by sharing it with those who face the scarcity.

Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

IELTS ESSAY  FACE TO FACE OR WRITTEN 

When it comes to communication, people have traditionally relied on both written form, as well as face to face meetings. However, it is often profoundly debated by different schools of thought whether one mode outshines the other.  

It is undeniable that man being a social animal has overwhelmingly relied on going over and meeting acquaintances, and discussing matters in person. This helps afford clarity and maintain cohesiveness, both in professional and social terms, in exchange of views and opinions. When people are seated in front of each other, they do not only use oral and verbal form but also non-verbal expressions to transmit their feelings and responses. A personal meeting aids in eliminating  ambiguity, and many a  times faster resolution of problems.

Moreover, meeting in person can cut down the time wasted in communication considerably. When people preside over in a meeting they experience an instant exchange of views. This spontaneity can rarely be had when individuals write emails, letters, blogs and articles to name a few. Since one does not have to wait for their counterparts to respond.

However, some vouch for the written form as a formidable means of communication.  Their opinion stems from the fact that whatever is transmitted in the form of texts can be recorded and retained permanently. In their view, agreements cannot be arrived upon unless ratified and endorsed in written or printed content. This is why most of the legal documents, contracts are printed on paper to make the claims and agreements valid. 

In hindsight, I partially concur with the given statement since both these mediums are used abundantly by everyone. Hence, it can be said, they complement each other rather than superseding.

Some think that radio is the best way to get news while other think that television is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some think that radio is the best way to get news while other think that television is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Ielts Essay - TV or Radio 

Radio and Television are undoubtedly most commonly used modes of mass communication, especially when it comes transmitting and receiving news. However, which medium is good for this task has evoked an eternal debate.

Many consider radio to be a more acceptable way of obtaining news about different happenings. Their view is based on the non-intrusive quality of this gadget. Listeners can know about the events and about the important updates while carrying out their other essential tasks simultaneously since they do not have to focus on either reading a newspaper; watching the visuals; or pay attention and look at someone talking to them.

Moreover, this humble twentieth century innovation has continued to gain favors even in the modern times due to its portability. By virtue of being able to run even on small batteries along with its small size, as small as a headphone receiver, radios in form of transistors, car stereos and as an attachment on mobiles continue to satisfy the craving of keen news hunters who must stay outdoors or even the remotest of the locations, and who can ill-afford to waste their time looking for a source of getting news. 

Nevertheless, there is a sizeable lobby that is more inclined to television as a source of news. Viewers are able to inform themselves comprehensively about the happenings world over, due to transmission of videos and pictures along with detailed reporting. People do not have to tax their imaginative powers in order to know something as everything can be seen on the TV screens.

To conclude, controversies apart, comparing television and radio as source of obtaining news is a mere squabble. Both of these innovations in mass communications address diverse audience though they sometimes complement each other too.   

Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take an interest in protecting the environment?

Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take an interest in protecting the environment? 

 

Ielts Essay Environment Warning and Remedies 

There is a growing concern that despite the doomsday forecasts about crisis posed by deterioration in the quality of environment by various environmentalists, no one seems to pay any heed. This indifference can be attributed to various reasons; however, the situation can be salvaged with prudent steps.

Human intent to make life better and comfortable, and the greed to prosper rapidly, in every sphere of life – be it farming, industry or even lifestyle –  is taking a toll on the nature. The continued tryst is like a mirage, an indefinite pursuit,  where humans seem to shift the goals forward after every achievement. Many do think about the environment, but  they always tend to assert that after enjoying the exploits of their achievements, they would shift focus to the environment protection measures, but unfortunately that rarely happens. 

On top of that, to add insult to injury, there is a complete absence of affordable alternatives – fuels, raw material and food to name a few, which makes it imperative for people to continue using whatever they have at their disposal. The technologies that have also been developed and could supersede the conventional natural resources are either in rudimentary form, or are extremely expensive to be commercially viable for mass use.

However, it is not too late to act. If governments respond judiciously by making stringent laws to curtail indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources besides promoting and subsidizing non-conventional resources and greener technologies, inhabitants of this planet can be forced, or persuaded to abandon their indifferent attitude and listen to what the mother nature wants them appreciate.

In hindsight, if strongly feel if the human society wakes up to the perils it is facing due to damage their activities are causing to this planet, the future generation might get to live in hospitable conditions.

Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing. Why do you think it is happening? How can this problem be solved?

Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing. Why do you think it is happening? How can this problem be solved?

 

Ielts Essay Public Transport Prices 

It is been observed nowadays that the accessing public transit systems are becoming dearer with every passing day. There are obvious reasons for this; however, the solutions are available on hand which could make this mode affordable.   

The primary reason for such an unprecedented increment in the facilitation charge of public mode of transit can be attributed to the ever rising population that needs to travel places. To render consistent efficient services to the growing number of users, continuous expansion and augmentation of the rail and bus networks has become a necessity. This exercise needs huge investments which cannot be funded single handedly by the government, by using money sourced from tax payers. Hence, to prevent chaos and crisis, some burden must be borne by commuters.

Moreover, the constantly changing technology has not either made the things easier for the authorities: it is imperative to focus on bringing around improvements in the methods, techniques being used in the mass transit systems. These enhancements would allow optimum utilization of resources and also improve the travelling experiences, but as said, these additions do not come for free. Thus, raising fares is inevitable.

Nevertheless, certain prudent steps can help bring down the cost of public transit. Distribution of load between different modes of transport, like roadways and trains could hold a viable solution. Establishing networks complimenting each other rather than competing could help a great deal. For instance, encouraging commuters to use trains for longer journeys and buses for the shorter ones could hold a key and make travelling by public transport relatively cheaper.

Hence, even though the rising public transport tariff   is no doubt a cause of worry, this can easily overcome provided some judicious planning is undertaken while assigning roles to different modes of transportation.

Many people say that Universities should offer places to young students with highest marks. Others feel that they should accept people with all ages, even if they do not do well. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Many people say that Universities should offer places to young students with highest marks. Others feel that they should accept people with all ages, even if they do not do well. Discuss both views and give your opinion.  .

 

IELTS ESSAY UNIVERSITIES ADMISSION

More and more universities, today, are establishing higher intake score benchmarks for aspirants under a specified age - for entry. Many find these stipulations quite rational though many voice their dissent over this, calling it unfair.

Varsities are premier places of education that have limited spaces. The dilemma of the authorities, in this case, is quite justifiable. If everyone were rendered a chance of entering these institutions, the possibility of the most deserving learners being deprived of opportunities of finding a place would increase by virtue of first come first serve rule coming into play. This would mean a great loss not only for the students but also for the society, as well.

Moreover, university courses need an intensive full-time study routine, as well as a high level of intellect, which average performers and ones being unable to commit themselves completely due to professional and personal obligations, may find it hard to cope with. This would not only cause a decline in quality of outcomes but also a rise in drop-outs. Thus, causing financial loss too – due to loss of fee with learners leaving mid-way.  

Some, nevertheless, find little substance in this policy. They feel, marks scored in exams – which may be obtained using strategies and unfair means -  fail to not elucidate true brilliance. Furthermore, an older individual may not have been able to enroll for a course because of certain limitations, but may be needing to join one in order to augment their skills. This would quite an injustice to those people.

To conclude, I feel that it is even though true that varsities need to prevent chaos and also maintain their academic reputation, a middle path must be discovered to also let in those who are willing to find a place in these institutions.

Some say parents & teachers should restrict children's behavior. Others say they should be left free to behave. Discuss

Some  say parents & teachers should restrict children's behavior. Others say they should be left free to behave. Discuss and give your opinion in not less than 250 words with relevant examples from your own experience. 

Ielts Essay Restricting Child Behavior 

Child rearing is both an arduous, as well as a tricky task. To make it worthwhile, many suggest imposing a strict control over their behavior by parents and teachers though some propose exercising certain amount of freedom with the young ones.

Spare the rod and spoil the child. Therefore, maintaining strict vigil over the conduct of children is of critical importance. They are too immature to distinguish right from right, and any failure to do so, could make the young minds go astray; hence, causing distortion in their personalities, and they may grow up as unruly and unyielding individuals.

Furthermore, failing to regulate child behavior has can further influence other spheres of their adult lives. Juveniles find it hard to adjust with others and accommodate disparate opinions. This can impede progress in personal, social and the professional realms. And, by the time they realize and try to overcome these shortcomings, it may be too late. Thus, it is quite justified to nip the evil in its bud and let not a preventable issue exacerbate into a serious challenge that may hamper the growth.

Nevertheless, some do not concur with restricting the ways in which the children behave. This school of thought feels that there is a likelihood of growing minds becoming too timid or bereft of creativity and ability to take initiative. There is a good chance that these youngsters may never be able to take decisions without directions of others since they may be lacking in confidence.

In the end, I personally feel exercising extremes may not be in the interest of the young lot, the upcoming generation is the future of society and it is the responsibility of both teachers and the parents to ensure future inhabitants grow up as well-behaved adults.

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. This is having a negative impact on the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. This is having a  negative impact on the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

IELTS ESSAY NEGLECT OF CHILDREN 

No wonder with most adults spending most of their day confined to their cubicles, or engaged in their social obligations, children are the hardest hit since they are generally ignored. This is having a detrimental impact on the young  ones though some do have contrasting views on this.

This neglect, as per social theorist, is taking children away from not only sense of family identity but it is also becoming extremely challenging to perpetuate culture and traditions. The near absence of any fruitful interaction between people and their little ones is making it hard to familiarize little ones with their family backgrounds - explaining about the importance of relationships with grandparents and cousins, as well as enlighten them about the customs.

Moreover, another adverse impact that can hardly be ignored is the young ones becoming arrogant due to lack of monitoring. Youngsters do not have anyone to guide them – the situation is exacerbated by availability  of violence laden games and TV shows. This deprives growing minds of opportunities to learn about acceptable behavior, which can have a long lasting ramifications for their personalities.

However, many see this failing to look after by parents  in positive light. They feel that this teaches children to be independent and responsible. Since for most of the day they do not have anyone to care for them, the young ones learn to be independent and grow up as responsible individuals. It has been seen that such youngsters grow up with a broader perspective of the world around them.    

On an overall, although it is true that parents are not able to devote time to their wards as they did in the past, the outcomes are not as grim as many might fear though everyone should strike a healthy balance between personal and professional life.   

Some people think that shops should sell the food products from local area, rather than selling products imported from other countries. Do you agree or disagree.

Some people think that shops should sell the food products from local area, rather than selling products imported from other countries.

Do you agree or disagree.

 

IELTS ESSAY ON FOOD 

With the global markets opening up, consumers have now access to goods, especially food from across the world. A school of thought is seen fierce lobbying for businesses prioritizing local produce. This may seem to be justified to some, there are however, voices of dissent from other quarters.

Laying emphasis on food sourced locally, is closely connected with the narrative of supporting and promoting local economy. This has, more or less, turned out to be an emotional issue with the groups that connect it with patriotism. As per them, most of the times, the food brought from other parts of the world mean undermining local farmers and manufacturers who, at times, are unable to compete with the charisma of imported goods. This does not only put local producers at disadvantage but also means money flowing out.

Furthermore, as more strongly asserted by some, local produce is virtually unmatched in quality and appropriateness. Admittedly, imports usually take a long time to complete, as a result exporting entities in other countries resort to using preservatives. This can affect the taste, as well as the quality of the eatables.

However,  many suggest a more liberal approach towards this, harboring a hostile and protectionist attitude and that also in times of globalization will prove to be disadvantageous for the country as  a whole, as it might fetch  similar responses from affected exporting countries. Besides this, it is not prudent to deprive the consumers of variety that can be laid at their disposal by making foreign food goods available.

To conclude, I cannot subscribe to this idea completely. There should be a balance maintained between local and foreign food items, instead of prioritizing either of the commodities. Such an arrangement would prove to be beneficial in the long run.

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.

IELTS ESSAY ONLINE OR CLASSROOM SESSION 

Technology may have revolutionized the realm of education, and many may be feeling that delivering of courses is now better done online rather than through classroom sessions, I do not subscribe to this notion, and consider classroom teaching can never be superseded.

Classes on internet seem to in vogue with those who suggest that this new technique is helping save invaluable money – otherwise spent on establishment of facilities with large classrooms and providing ancillary support, like maintenance and administration. This has allowed educational institutions to divert financial resources to focus on more critical areas, such as improving the quality of the content to be delivered, dedicating more money to explore better and better resources of education.

Moreover, not just the establishment cost, online tutoring has also made it possible for the teachers to save money and time wasted on travelling to and from schools and colleges. This has not only helped the individuals but also the organizations who do not have give extra money to faculty on account of travelling expenses, or providing them conveyance. Individual faculty can also  now spend that extra time with the students

Having said that, classroom sessions are virtually irreplaceable, for the benefits reaped in the classes are virtually unmatched. While delivering lectures and  content to the students, the tutors are able to gauge the responses of the learners and react accordingly. Similarly, pupils are also able to comprehend better in a formal academic environment, in presence of teacher and their classmates. This can help improve the academic outcomes dramatically. 

To conclude, it can be said that despite online courses gaining colossal fan following, conventional classroom based sessions are virtually irreplaceable. This traditional method equipped with its basic yet comprehensive approach has always brought laurels for both learners and teachers.

In some places, people's lifestyles are Changing rapidly and it affects the family relationship. Do the Advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In some places, people's lifestyles are Changing rapidly and it affects the family relationship.

Do the Advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

 

IELTS ESSAY - Lifestyle changes and Family Relationship 

Quickly shifting paradigms in the way people are living today is impacting their interaction with their families. This transformation does have certain benefits and drawbacks, but do they outshine each other, is a matter worthy of a deep analysis.

Undoubtedly, switchovers in the lifestyles, often resulting in nuclear family settings, has rendered more independence to individuals. They, no more, need to be dependent on the moods and preferences of others to do something. This has, in a way, helped fetch extremely satisfying experiences for many where they are able to lead a life as per their choice and, consequently, avoid clashes.  

Having said that, despite many virtually venerating this new shift in the ways of life, it is really disheartening to see the way people struggling to cope with the challenges posed by living away from their families. The emotional connect, the bonhomie,  and the bonding seem to have gone missing, and it has been replaced with a strange sense of competition, where each one is trying to prove their superiority over their once closed ones with whom they shared feelings of endearment.

Moreover, the enstrangement is a common sight between ones who lived and shared the space, resulting in disappearance of family and social values. The hardest hit of this change are  the young ones born in the nuclear families: they are never able to familiarize themselves with their own relatives, and end up drifting away from their family identity. In the long run it is feared that this might undo the social fabric and harm the society.

Hence, I can clearly assert that the even though hard to evade, contemporary way of living has brought in more misery, for all, than promises. It is clear that if this trend continues, society will soon be populated with those apathetical to others.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Change has always been a matter profoundly debated; many are quite open and liberal about accepting and integrating it in their lives, while some are averse and, in fact, hostile to even the slightest of hints about altering anything in their routines. I feel that both have their views well-supported with plausible reasons.

Change has been the fundamental law of nature, as many suggest. Ability to adapt successfully to the fast transforming surroundings and environments guarantees survival. The ones  who can adapt to shifts do not only weather the harshest of the times but also get to enjoy the exploits of success attained thereafter. This can be easily exemplified from historical events, where civilizations that failed to respond appropriately to the fast altering world order ceased to exist, while who adapted themselves ruled supreme.

Moreover, doing things  differently is considered to be a way to innovate: it has an element of adventure, that allows encountering and overcoming uncertainties. For this school of thought, humans are subject to change in the same way as the days and nights, and seasons. Altering methods of working and leading life can afford freshness, excitement and consequently, improvements, and evade boredom.

Having said that, the other lobby is more comfortable with working in the same settings. They dread even the slightest deviations in their methods, for that might force them to expend efforts once again to attain similar success, and also  expose them to failure.  This attitude is more visible among the ageing population who are reluctant to even engaging with the new technology.

To recap, It can be said that both the views are justified. Change despite being an essential element that has brought around numerous improvements, staying put in similar settings is sometimes important

Some people believe that price is the only consideration when buying something. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Some people believe that price is the only consideration when buying something. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Ielts Essay Prices considerations 

Of late, people have been making their decisions about purchases based on the prices of goods though there are still some who do not mind paying more for something they buy. Both the sections have their valid reasons for their inclinations.

Undoubtedly, in the times when the cost of living is registering a near vertical rise, people have started resorting to preparing budgets for their household requirements. Since the money at their disposal is extremely limited – and many necessities must be fulfilled, households try to get the goods they need at the cheapest possible price. By doing this,  a lot of money can be saved for other important things which may be more critical.

Besides this, those bitten by the bug of consumerism seldom use anything for long due to constant changes and upgraded in the technology aided with facelifts. And, when individuals buy things, like mobiles, cars, televisions, etc. quite frequently, they find little rationale behind paying more for a commodity. Moreover, the price wars between the competing consumer goods companies have encouraged and promoted this trend.

Having said that, many hold a view that price may be one of the factors but not an absolute reason that influence purchase decisions. Buyers generally tend to overlook prices when the merchandise, or services in question are linked to health, safety of the users. They rarely take chances by investing into something, even at a cheaper price, which can jeopardize their health and safety. This is evident in cases where purchases are linked to food, and buyers prefer quality over the cost.

To conclude, i do not completely subscribe to the notion that prices influence the decision of purchase. People buying goods take into account several aspects before actually committing their resources to procuring something.

It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

IELTS ESSAY OPEN SPACES

Since a past few decades, urban sprawl has resulted in conversion of areas into concrete jungles. This has prompted a lobby of urban town planners to propose establishment of open spaces, in form of squares and parks though there are certain voices of dissent over this.

Creating open spaces would help improve the quality of life of inhabitants of urban locations by much required relief from the suffocating urban landscape dominated by built-up structures, sprawling complexes, skyscrapers, etc. Public squares with views of open skies, and garden laden with greenery also, render a relaxing environment and let the inhabitants experience a healthy distraction from hectic mundane and depressing encounters with concreted areas. This can let people forgo the need to leave cities and towns to seek solace and solitude.   

Moreover, such locations can provide opportunities for not only socializing but also entertaining to  the  otherwise overwhelmed by extremely busy and overburdened with obligations, city and town dwellers. Most are bereft of time and money to  avail facilities offered by more formal settings of clubs, that charge exorbitant amounts. People can simply go to these locations and meeting others at their convenience without needing to pay anything.

However, some critics voice their doubts over such a proposal. They term it as a misuse of land resources in the times when urban locations are facing a deep scarcity of usable land. Taking such a step would only cause an unprecedented increment in the prices. Thus, making it harder for many to afford dwelling units, or offices. This would only fuel urban spread, as they fear.

In conclusion, even though the issue of creating open has descended into senseless squabble. I feel that gardens and public squares can help rejuvenate distressed inhabitants, as well as the city scape.   

 .

It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. What would be the best solution to keep them open, in your opinion?

It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. What would be the best solution to keep them open, in your opinion?

Ielts Essay Museums and Maintenance 

Museums although hold an important place in any society, escalating costs have made it hard for the authorities to maintain these places for the access of people. There are certain ways that can render a way out of this crisis. 

The most prominent of the methods to keep museums working and yet accessible to visitors is initiating a private partnership in the management. It is undeniable that commercial organizations always seek profits, this would enable optimum utilization of available resources;  thus saving money lost on account of inefficient systems. Even though many fear that may also mean a hike in the access fee,  this can be kept minimal by using the annual government grants to subsidize tickets. 

Others, however, propose more  practical ways that could help without making major changes in the management structure of these establishments: by leasing the spare spaces for private functions, social gatherings and programs, this would boost the revenues. Most of the museums are located in or near the city centers which makes them really an attractive option for social gatherings. 

Similarly, there is a lobby that vouches  for more revolutionary ways, like integrating technology, and also opening up multiple facilities in the premises of these locations.   By using interactive technology, authorities can create interesting activities that engross children and adults alike, at nominal charges that people will readily part with.  This could help rouse fascination for such places among the visitors. Besides this, opening up movie theaters that focus on films specific to the subject of the museums could also be a great way to augment revenues. 

In conclusion, I feel that private participation might not be an appropriate way out, but making these places interesting by offering interactive activities, besides rendering other facilities could do wonders.

Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past. What are the main reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development?

Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past. What are the main reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development?

Ielts Essay Modern Culture 

Of late, distinct socio-cultural boundaries have been seemingly blurring, as a result, making world a smaller place to live. This transformation – that can be ascribed to various factors – is receiving resounding cheers from various quarters though it has also been a subject of wrath, due to associated drawbacks.

Person to person contact – that is transcending political, religious and ethnic boundaries – driven by technology, especially internet, is fueling sentiments of globalization among the inhabitants of the new world order. This has proven to be more effective that any socio-political initiatives, that targeted creating understanding among people. An open and unrestricted dialogue has helped develop harmonious tastes in terms of music, movies, festivals and even choice of consumer goods.

This not so new phenomenon, has resulted in creating strange bonhomie between the global citizens, as  they brush aside their tribal attitudes and get used to leading a life like a global citizen in true sense. Optimism about the outcomes reverberates in abundance: it is felt that this would help humanity to rise above differences and strive jointly to overcome challenges – present and future, like pollution, threats of nuclear war, poverty, to name a few  – with a greater effort and chance of success.

However, the conservatives are quite apprehensive of this development. They fear that this might lead to dilution of identity, distinct ways of life, art, language and culture, and consequently, wisdom accumulated over the ages by ancestors, which would be an irreplaceable loss. Thus, rendering mankind poorer in terms of knowledge related to the associated with diminishing civilization.

In the hindsight, I feel, this melting of diverse cultures should be promulgated though efforts should be made to preserve valuable knowledge by sharing it with global  citizens so that any loss of linked knowhow is evaded.

Nowadays many individuals spend more time out of their hometown. Why is it happening? What is the impact of this on a person and their family?

Nowadays many individuals spend more time out of their hometown. Why is it happening? What is the impact of this on a person and their family?

Many are moving out, or traveling out of their hometowns and cities to other locations more often than they did in the past. This can be attributed to several factors, but whatever may be the case, this movement is impacting them and their families in several ways. 

The trend of outward movement - permanent or temporary - is primarily an outcome of intent to seek better education. With most becoming ambitious and focused on their objectives of gaining skills in desired areas of expertise, they invest every effort in attainment of their goals. To see this through, they are prepared to stay away from their families in other cities ,or even countries. 

Moreover, earning a decent livelihood that can afford them all possible comforts and luxuries besides the basic necessities, besides bagging a job that matches the skill sets and that addresses professional aspirations, is the greatest of the desires of the inhabitants of the consumerist era. To accomplish this, they explore and discover opportunities in destinations away from their own areas, and often make the new locations their home.   

This migration to other locations to secure appropriate education or employment is, however, detaching people, especially the young ones born to the parents who had to settle in far away locations, from their families. The warmth and emotions seemingly diminish as the time passes, and such people find it hard to reconnect back and often end up being feeling alienated whenever they reunite. The society is also experiencing weakening of social ties and bonding. Thus, leading to the loss of social values.

In conclusion, although moving away from families is inevitable in the modern times, the adverse outcomes of this parting from families and social groups need to mitigated, so that familial and social bonding does not diminish.