Some people think that robots are important for human's future development. Others think that robots have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that robots are important for human's future development. Others think that robots have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Ielts Essay Robots 

Robots, the marvels of modern technology, have been hailed as path-breaking innovations, and are perceived as critical for future forays by some, while others are cynical of the impact these machines will have on humans.  

Undoubtedly, robots have ushered in a era of convenience; and with the advent of more intelligent machines in near future, that are almost in the fruition stage, their interaction is bound to rise. This will surely render an ease of life. Smart machines capable of comprehending voice commands and functioning accordingly, would render not only house hold chores but also tedious office work effortless; thus affording ever becoming busier humans much more time for themselves.

Besides this, what now many avoid doing considering the nature of task to be extremely hazardous, robots – equipped with smart intelligence – would make those jobs look safer: their interventions would make it possible for humans to stay at a safe distance and let these devices carry out research and experiments in remote and dangerous places, like deep sea and space exploration, assessing volcanoes and their nature, etc. Moreover, robotics, the way it has been developing, it seems, will make errors things of the past, especially in case of high precision equipment manufacturing and surgeries.

However, there are concerned and cynical views proliferation of robotics in every walk of life. Many feel that these furtherance of these modern machines would cast an evil shadow over humanity, rendering humans incompetent and making them completely dependent on machines; thus exposing them to unwarranted situations in case of an even of some calamity.

In a nutshell, I feel, even though robots present some risks, it would be inappropriate a response to fear these machines; it is necessary to embrace new technology and not treat with a disdain.

In many countries small shops and town centers are going out of business, because people tend to drive to the large out-of-town stores. This results in an increase in car use, and it also means that people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores. Do you think advantages of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

In many countries small shops and town centers are going out of business, because people tend to drive to the large out-of-town stores. This results in an increase in car use, and it also means that people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores. Do you think advantages of such development outweigh its disadvantages?  

 

IELTS Essay - Out Of city Superstores Boon or bane 

Advent of large super markets on the outer fringes of cities has meant ceasing of business for town centers and small shops in the cities. This, as per some, is a promising prospect that would help drive in several benefits, for others, there could not have been a worse proposal.

Opening up of big departmental stores on the outskirts of urban areas has helped decongest cities, especially the interiors; thus making lives easier for city dwellers.  No more do the centers and business districts face ugly scenarios of public spaces being encroached by parked vehicles which shrunk the pedestrian zones: making it harder for people to move around.

However, as many suggest, this trend has brought in more drawbacks than benefits, most prominent being a staggering rise in air pollution. While in cities, people could afford to travel even by public transport, using personal conveyance has become a compulsion in this case. As the number of cars plying on the roads rise, there have been reports of a substantial increment in emissions in the suburbs, exurbs, and close vicinities of such stores. 

Moreover, this new arrangement has left many sulking, those without personal conveyance, are unable to obtain goods of their choice, and must stay satisfied with whatever nearby shops afford  them. Besides this, experience of even those, with cars, has not been too encouraging either. Shopping in  distant locations has led to upsetting of monthly budgets: consumers must plan and buy in excess, as travelling to outskirts cannot be an everyday affair.

In a nutshell, I would not say that establishing super markets in outlying areas of urban locations is altogether laden with drawbacks; however, one can hardly  ignore pitfalls this change has brought along. I believe town planning needs to be more prudent.

As greater number of people move to cities, and as cities expand in size, city life loses it’s appeal. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

As greater number of people move to  cities, and as cities expand in size, city life loses it’s appeal. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

IELTS ESSAY CITY LIFE

Urban areas, world over,  are facing a growing influx of migrants; thus overcrowding them and causing diverse and steep challenges to surface. This has indeed led to a disenchantment from urban even though some defy this view.

Life in urban locales do not enjoys the same reputation they had a few years ago since the an ever rising urban population has resulted in a persistent disarray, which is making it harder for the urbanites to experience comfortable living: they find themselves longing for a view of open skies and green surroundings in street canyons dominated by concrete constructions. Any attempts  made to ease this  burden results in an urban sprawl, which is predisposing city dwellers to great travelling distances, longer commuting times; and hence stress.

Moreover, life in cities does not fascinate many nowadays; it has been eclipsed by the rising costs of living and subsistence. People residing in urban locations must part with a huge a chunk of their earnings to pay for housing and other essentials, like food and clothing. This leaves them with little savings; thus eroding the benefits of shifting to urban locations.

Having said that, life in cities will continue to ignite fascination, as some profess. Metropolitan areas have employment opportunities galore, and people from a cross-section of skills, can easily find work in their respective occupations. Besides this, these locations afford people access to quality education, both basic formal tuition and advanced university system. This can help many plan a secure future for not only themselves but also for their children.

Hence, I feel, despite many quoting reasons for their opinions about urban life losing its shine, metropolises and their lifestyles will continue to enchant, and push more and more to relocate to cities.

Nowadays, many people leave their hometowns to look for better jobs. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. Give your opinion and give an example from your own knowledge or experience in support of your view.

Nowadays, many people leave their hometowns to look for better jobs. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. Give your opinion and give an example from your own knowledge or experience in support of your view.

Ielts Essay Distant Places for Jobs 

These days, a trend is being witnessed among many who shift to distant locations in search of greener pastures. This, as per many, has several benefits; however, others point out at the drawbacks of this. I will discuss both the aspects and share my views.

Relocating to other cities in search of good employment exposes people to abundant opportunities of landing a job that suits their qualifications, and matches their expectations. This raises their chances of enhancing their earning capacities, thereby improving their living standards. They can plan better for their future and also fulfill their dreams: buying a good house, affording their children quality education, and also accumulate  wealth for a safe and secure future.

Moreover, moving away from home renders individuals opportunities to broaden their horizons and also become independent. When people relocate in search of livelihood, they get to know the outer world more closely, and also interact with others, whom they may not be able to come in contact with while staying back at their homes. This, free of any external assistance, interaction helps them form rational view of world, besides fostering confidence in them about taking decisions independently.

However, this trend does have a darker side to it. With people moving away from home turf, the prospects of their communicating with their families and peers are reducing considerably; thus, causing erosion of social and ethical values. The hardest hit are the children born to such people, who rarely get to interact with their grandparents and cousins, thereby, reducing relevance and importance of familial relationships.

In a nutshell, I personally opine, even though this relatively new concept has both positives and negatives, leaving hometown and settling down in distant locations for the sake of rich employment opportunities is highly advantageous. 

Some people think that schools should involve students in school management. Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Give reasons for your answer.i

Some people think that schools should involve students in school management. Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Give reasons for your answer.

 

Ielts Essay 

To make formal education a more enriching experience for the young, many educationalists, citing several benefits, have started suggesting about letting young learners play in active role in administration of schools. Nevertheless, this policy has its own darker side, which can hardly be ignored.

Allocating students administrative roles is bound to bring in rich benefits: incorporating such a policy would pave way for creating a clearer understanding among pupils about the challenges facing school authorities – which often feature in the list of unwarranted grievances of young learners. An active participation would let them become responsible and accountable; and help dissuade them from subversive activities – that often culminate in damage to school property.

Moreover, introducing such a practice will enable students hone certain essential skills that might prove to be highly useful in later life. When learners would take part in school administration, they would obtain extensive knowhow of management, decision-making, and taking initiative – sometimes in collaboration with others and at others, on their own. This could assist young minds grow up as rational adults proficient in prudent planning.

However, critics bring forth pitfalls of this proposal: encouraging participation in school management will prove to be counter-productive – cause distraction from studies. Learners would waste their invaluable time on non-essential affairs; thus leaving them with little time to focus on the fundamental objective – obtaining education – which of course will be quite unacceptable. Moreover, a confusion may descend on the environment of school where every student will be attempting to push around their weight – even leading to rivalry.

In a nutshell, I feel that this concept has both a brighter and darker side to it. Hence, even though this  proposal is worthy of implementation, extreme discretion should exercised while inviting young learners for an active participation in school management. 

These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

Ielts Essay - Generations in Workforce 

Nowadays, professional environment, populated by a workforce that constitutes of personnel from diverse generations, experiences varied challenges, while also bringing along certain benefits. I, however, personally feel that it would be quite inappropriate to descend into a squabble weighing benefits and drawbacks: an organization with such a mix is bound to reap rich benefits, by virtue of having access to seasoning, as well as energy and flair.

Having two generations striving together to attain organizational objectives, is bound to provide an unparalleled edge over rivals. Many human resources experts cite various reasons for this notion: such a business has not only an expansive experience and a pragmatic vision to guide the organization through the thin and thick in various spheres of business – by devising strategies and plans, but also a workforce of young enthusiastic professionals, to implement carefully devised strategies, raring to go and take a shot at success.

Besides this, older workers – with an extensive exposure by their sides – help enrich experience of young employees through a productive engagement and dialogue. This way, a business is able to perpetuate business ethics, work culture and success; expertise and proficient skills are  transferred to the younger generation of personnel.

However, a certain section of management experts express their reservations about such a mixture. To support their views, despite lacking much substance, they cite instances of rift struggle fuelled by generational divide between the young and  the older personnel. They feel that as the aspirations, approach and expectations of people born decades apart tend to vary enormously, there is little chance of them working harmoniously and joining hands.

In the end, there is hardly any pitfall in individuals from diverse generations coming together to work. It is a fact that a successful army has always been led by seasoned commanders and battle fields conquered by young soldiers.

Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

 

Ielts Essay Bringing Up Environment  

As per many environmentalists, ecological balance of the blue planet is on the brink of collapse and very soon, the Earth may become inhospitable; however, this notion is quashed by the optimistic lobby that professes that it is never too late and a lot can be done to protect environment.

Mankind, in an attempt to register a radical progress in almost every walk of life, has resorted to exploiting every imaginable natural resource. This has been going on since last three centuries as humans have gone around denuding the planet to make way for bigger and bigger industrial towns, to provide more and more manufactured goods; create areas for settlements and dwelling units to provide accommodation for an ever-rising population; and bringing land under the occupation of primary activities to practice agriculture – on large scale, Diary-farming – on industrial scale, and provide pastures for grazing of diary animals. These activities have culminated in large-scale  destruction of natural habitats of diverse flora and fauna; thus causing extinction of numerous species of plants and animals, which can never be retrieved now.

Having said that, there is a big group of environment specialists who assert that the situation is not as  desperate as it has been promoted by certain pessimistic naturalists. As per them, mankind has made enough progress to shift focus from naturally occurring minerals to artificially synthesized materials, and revolutionary concepts of using non-conventional energy resources. This has helped the society to maximize productivity with minimal use of natural resources; thus, sparing natural habitats and environment for the plants and animals. 

In a nutshell, after assessing both the views in detail, I feel that despite extensive damage done to the planet, things can be salvaged and humans can make the environment sustainable.  

Some people think that money is the best gift to youngsters, while others disagree. Give both views and give your opinion. Write at least 250 words.

Some people think that money is the best gift to youngsters, while others disagree. Give both views and give your opinion. Write at least 250 words.

 

Ielts Essay Giving Money as Gift 

Child rearing is surely an arduous task and gifting them something, that might appeal them, is equally a tricky job. To overcome uncertainty of how the young ones might like or treat a gift with disdain, many have shifted their preferences to offering them money instead. They cite several benefits of such a practice; however, this has also raised many eyebrows.

Giving money to young ones seems to be a more practical option today, for the expectations and aspirations have undergone a sea change. Undoubtedly, young people have many more things, like gadgets and activities, which were beyond imagination for the preceding generation, at their disposal; this has created a gap between what people expected from their gifts in the past and what the youth means today by anything being rendered as presents. This can cause a friction, and to evade such incidence, elders offer money instead of any commodity or goods.

Having said that, there are many who protest against this practice. They term offering money to the young ones as gift as a recipe to disaster, and actually inviting trouble: young minds, inexperienced as they are, may become extravagant, demanding and stop appreciating the value of money. Moreover, when parents are usually absent from their families due to their professional obligations, the young ones could also pick up wrong habits, in absence of any monitoring. Consequently, this can spell trouble for the mothers and fathers, who will be at their wits end trying to satisfy ever rising demands of their wards.

In a nutshell, I feel, the practice of offering money is not as evil as it has been project by certain sections; it can instead help children fulfill their legitimate desires and also help prevent friction among the family members.  

Some people think that it’s best to encourage children to leave family home as soon as possible. Others believe children should stay at their family home for as long as they like. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that it’s best to encourage children to leave family home as soon as possible. Others believe children should stay at their family home for as long as they like. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Ielts Essay Family or Out of Family 

Of late parents, citing several reasons and benefits, have been motivating their young ones to start living separately. However, this has also stirred a debate: many are unwilling to participate in this new trend. They feel that choosing to move out or live with the family should be prerogative of the children.

Inspiring children to live out of their families is backed by a strong conviction; adopting such a step would let  growing minds learn about living independently and taking decisions on their own. Many a times, it has been observed, when young ones live away from their comfort zones, they have no one to guide and monitor. This invigorates their intellect; making them go for exploring options, without any external intervention, and learning about distinguishing the correct choices from the incorrect ones; thus, fostering confidence and independent thinking.

Moreover, this can also help in broadening horizons of young growing minds. When they go out and interact with the outer world without anyone, their nears and dears to their aid, young ones learn about negotiating, communicating and socializing with  an array of people. This helps form  a broader and rational perspective about others; eventually making them grow up as prudent personalities.

Nevertheless, there is a conventional view that exhibits more traditional approach: allowing sons and daughters to continue living with the families. This helps children learn about living with older people and making adjustments according to the need; and fostering a sense of empathy towards others and, in particular, their own families. Such individuals grow up as tolerant, selfless and compassionate adults

In a nutshell. I personally feel that deciding about living with family or independently should be left to the young ones itself; they would learn both ways, and obtain immense knowledge, wisdom and experience both ways.

Many childhood disease can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children?

Many childhood disease can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children?

 

Ielts Essay Immunization should be mandatory 

Radical advancements in medicine have afforded humanity a potent weapon that can help them overcome several diseases, right from the childhood, with help of a simple vaccination. This has, however, raised a moral and an ethical argument whether parents should be allowed to exercise their discretion of evading vaccinations for their little ones. I feel, this is an idea worthy of indignation, and any such rights must be wrested from the parents. 

Health is a state subject; hence, to ensure that everybody in a country stays healthy, governments should be vested with the jurisdiction to decide providing safeguards to the populace, including inoculating young ones. Failing this, health budget allocations for combative measures are bound to shoot through the roof, when growing children would be afflicted by the ailments that could have been avoided by a simple medical intervention. These very parents, who chose to  evade immunization,  would come back asking for medical assistance for children who missed out critical preventive treatment.

Moreover, letting parents circumventing vaccination process, for their  wards, would amount to jeopardizing the very future of the society; the present state of physical and mental health of young ones helps forecast how the society would fare in the future. In case, little ones are plagued by ailments, that could have been avoided, and that could actually turn serious at a later stage, would cast an evil shadow on not only the overall health index of society but also impede productivity.

To sum up, it can be said that appeasing parents in this case can prove to be an expensive mistake: putting the health of the future of society at stake; hence immunization process in the childhood should be mandatory, regardless of what mothers and fathers think.

Modern communications mean that it is no longer necessary to write letters. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern communications mean that it is no longer necessary to write letters. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ielts  Essay MOdern Communication vs Letter

Present day modes of sending and receiving messages has overwhelmed conventional channels of communicating. This, as per many has eroded the usefulness of hand written letters though others have contrary views. Amidst all the controversy, I feel, despite being almost grounded, writing letters would survive the onslaught of the technology.

Digital mediums, like emails, have ushered in an era of speedy interaction; and made letters look obsolete and out of sync with the current requirements. People, no more need to struggle to first write words on a piece of paper, an exercise that needed a lot of planning and time, and then mail it to the targeted individuals or organizations – which would cost days and sometimes weeks to reach the destination. Now users just need into log onto their online accounts, type the intended messages and send them right away.

Moreover, there is little doubt about the practical use of the latest introductions of word processors – that assist with the spell-checks and offer a wide choice of fonts to use from – that have made life a lot more easier; letter writers  have been relieved from the worries of keeping their handwriting legible and also clear of any spelling errors – that had a potential of distorting the meaning of the content.

Nevertheless, some still have a penchant, especially elderly, for writing letters. For them, using this ancient art means exhibiting care, compassion and love; writing words with hands often is perceived as an indicator of serious approach of the writers towards someone or a matter, by virtue of immense time and efforts spent on scribbling words on a piece of paper. 

In a nutshell, it can be said after looking at the views; although it may seem that written letters would be a thing of that past, there is a remote possibility of such a thing happening.

Many people say that the gap between the rich and poor sections of the society keeps increasing, as rich people keep getting richer and poor people keep getting poorer. What problems could this cause and give measures to address this issue? Give relevant examples.

Many people say that the gap between the rich and poor sections of the society keeps increasing, as rich people keep getting richer and poor people keep getting poorer.

What problems could this cause and give measures to address this issue?

Give relevant examples.

 

Ielts Essay Rich and Poor Gap 

Ever rising income disparity is driving a wedge between the haves and have-nots. This has alarmed many social theorists and  economists: this could predispose society to several challenges, as per them. There is a need to explore plausible mediums to mitigate these challenges.  

Widening gap in the levels of incomes of the elite and the destitute is leading to unwarranted consequences: there is an agreeable tension between the wealthy and impoverished class today, which is leading to jealousy. As the fault lines become more prominent, a mistrust among classes seems to be simmering. Consequently, there could be class struggles that may further precipitate into civil unrest and violence.

Furthermore, another impact of disproportionate distribution of wealth is also believed to be a major cause of increase in crime. As the desires of those, who lack resources, continue to rise – when they observe the prosperous class  enjoy the exploits of riches – they often resort to crime, in order to, fulfill those demands. This is a serious cause of concern: this might lead to deterioration of law and order in the society.

To overcome the challenges posed by unequal distribution of money, society must act fast. Governments need to usher in new policies that promote modern social and economic structure. Supporting poor with monetary assistance, like minimum wages and subsistence money, can go a long way. Besides this, certain non-monetary measures can also play a major role in mitigating resulting challenges: ensuring employment and free education and health services to the impoverished might also go a long way.

To sum up, the disproportionate distribution of wealth in the society is surely an issue to be taken seriously. However, even though not a panacea  certain steps, if applied judiciously can mitigate the challenge posed by ever increasing divide.  

In some societies, stress is now regarded as a major problem and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past. However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated. They say that previous generations were under more pressure, but the idea of suffering from stress did not exist. Discuss both these views and give your opinion in at least 250 words and mention any relevant examples from your own experience.

In some societies, stress is now regarded as a major problem and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past.

However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated. They say that previous generations were under more pressure, but the idea of suffering from stress did not exist. Discuss both these views and give your opinion in at least 250 words and mention any relevant examples from your own experience.

 

iIELTS Essay - Stress and Current Generation 

There is a topical argument ensuing between different schools of thought, after emergence of stress as a major feature of modern lifestyles, as to whether it is a reality, or a hoax. Where some suggest, the present generation is afflicted by this phenomenon, others point out that it was the past generation that faced more pressure than today, and yet remained unaffected.  

Stress today is ubiquitous, as per some. Working hours have stretched due to intense competition from rival businesses and colleagues; forcing people to remain confined to office cubicles for longer hours, and even on off-days. This is taking a toll on their personal lives: they are unable to sustain a work life balance; many find themselves juggling between fulfilling professional obligations, and addressing matters and concerns related to families. 

However, some ridicule this view, and feel that the stress current generation is facing, is its own making. People in the past had to work and travel for longer hours: they did not have such advanced technologies, as available today, to their aid. However, they remained virtually unaffected by work pressure: they were practical, being aware of their  limitations and not being over ambitious, and hardly set any insurmountable  goals.

Besides this, stress is more of an overstatement today. It rising due to people not interacting with others, as openly as they  did in the past. Their over-engagement with  technology in leisure, is taking them away from the society. Many find themselves indulging in watching television; playing games on computers and hand held devices; and interacting with their virtual contacts on social media. Thereby, forcing them to forego opportunities to socialize with their families and peers. 

To sum up, I feel, after assessing both the opinions, stress even though did not  emerge recently, seems to be afflicting the present generation more, but, the phenomenon is surely an outcome of over ambitious and over-zealous approach, it has embraced.  

Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film starts, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of job should be highly paid?

Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film starts, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree?

Which other types of job should be highly paid?

Ielts Essay Entertainers and Money

Astronomical earnings of entertainers and sports stars have been under critical scanner doe quite some time now, as some feel that these people earn much more than they are worthy of. I disagree with this notion completely even though I do feel that professionals in other occupations could be compensated better than what they are getting currently.

Despite a general belief that money being received by ones involved in sports or entertainment field being unjustifiably high, it is never enough for ensuring their future: entertainers are engaged in occupations that are known for their volatility. The opportunities available to them to make some money are extremely limited  and exposed to uncertainty. Entertainers losing charisma, and  sports personnel getting injured or going out of form may abruptly bring their careers to an abrupt end; they might end up languishing in poverty.

However, there are certain sections that find little rationale in performers and sports personnel in getting humungous amounts of money. Their view rests on their belief that entertainment and sports is of little consequence to the society. Whatever entertainers do is only for their self consumption and does not bring any kind of benefits. Such astronomical sums of money is sheer wastage, and much more than what should be paid.

There are though certain occupations which are worthy of being compensated better: teachers, researchers, medical professionals and soldiers to name a few. These professionals make personal sacrifices for the good of society. Their contributions to their fields have been substantial even though they have stayed away from the limelight.

To sum up, in spite of all the derision, the money being made by those involved entertainment and sports are not as high as common perceptions.

Euthanasia, or mercy killing, has been a controversial issue for many years. Although many people are strongly against such a practice, there is a growing demand to have it legalised. How far do you agree with euthanasia being made legal?

Euthanasia, or mercy killing, has been a controversial issue for many years. Although many people are strongly against such a practice, there is a growing demand to have it legalised. How far do you agree with euthanasia being made legal?

 

Ielts Essay - Euthanasia 

Permitting intentionally ending life of terminally ill or in vegetative state patients has always raised concerns among human rights activists. Even though some term this practice as justified, others express strong reservations. But, as per me, this issue needs a deep analysis, before being termed as justified, or unwarranted.

Allowing practice of euthanasia seems to be quite prudent, as per certain human rights proponents: sustaining people, who have been in a vegetative state since long, and stand little chance of  recovering, means unnecessarily imposing an extra financial burden on kith and kin of such individuals. Once the fact has been established that  it would be impossible to sustain such sick without expensive life support equipment, there is hardly any rationale behind keeping them alive. It would be merciful enough to let such patients perish and be relieved of their suffering.

A similar view is presented in support of this practice, for the extreme cases of the terminally ill – suffering from lethal and insurmountable medical condition. Keeping such sick people alive means subjecting them to excruciating pain and agony and extending their sufferings, and also making their close ones  desperate and hopeless. Legalizing clinically assisted death would help a great deal, in letting such people pass away in peace and without pain.

However, a school of thought vociferously ridicules such a proposal: they feel that declaring such a procedure legal is vulnerable to abuse and might result in gross misuse by certain next of kin, who are bound to benefit from such a practice, as in case of legal heirs, or spouses trying to be rid of their counterparts.

To conclude, although this is an extremely emotional issue that needs to be addressed carefully since it involves life of humans, and such a practice is prone to misuse, in extreme cases this proces should given a legal nod.   

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay Modern Lifestyles and Kids 

Nowadays, as everybody is embracing modern living, and spending more and more time at work and leisure, children seem to be at the receiving end: they are hardly subjected to monitoring, and rarely rendered affection unlike their counterparts did in the past. I feel that this trend seems to have descended permanently and will radically impact the family system.

It is undeniable that these days, in most families, both the parents are engrossed heavily in  fulfilling their professional obligations, which takes away a major portion of their time by either keeping them confined to their office cubicles, or making them travel for work; thus, resulting in their absence from their homes and families, and robbing them of even the leisure intervals that could be otherwise devoted to their off springs.

Besides this, with the rising living costs, it has become essential for many to keep seeking ways to bolster earnings. People have to often resort to foraying into multiple occupations. This intent is accompanied by need to obtain extra education and expertise. Undertaking such an endeavor makes mothers and fathers to devote their free time – even when they are at home – to their studies. This pushes the priority of looking after the children down the ladder.

On the top of that, whatever time parents can spare, is used in meeting their social obligations. As many suggest, keeping up with the society and prevalent trends is only  possible if people stay in touch with the peer group. This makes it imperative for both the spouses to divert their attention away from their children into enhancing their social presence. 

To conclude, it can be hence be said that mothers and fathers are left with little time to spare for their children, and this is going to stay. However, this is gong to have an adverse impact on the family life.  

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Ielts Essay Household and Recycling 

Environmental concerns, across the world, have led to proposing extension of recycling with more force, as a law, to the household sector: it produces equally huge amount of refuse; however, it does not really recycle as much as it should. I, thus, uphold the view that it is necessary to make recycling mandatory for every family.

It has been commonly observed, unless something is introduced as a statute – that involves penalties for any infringements, people fail to take the matters seriously. Over the years, governments have invested extensively in campaigns aimed at encouraging  every individual to include recycling in their social obligation. Nevertheless, the outcomes have been quite disappointing: everyone seems to be bitten by the bug of apathy, they feel that other sectors should handle such initiatives, and express their inability at being capable of handling such initiatives by themselves.

Moreover, by incorporating recycling as a regulation, state would be able to make citizens gradually realize and appreciate the benefits, both financial and environmental, and need of introducing recycling in their compulsory obligations. Most have seen little action and more lectures on this concept, which of course fails to attract many. But, when people would do it themselves, they would be able to see the tangible outcomes themselves.  In continuation, tangible results would encourage households to take recycling as a habit, which would help persuade others to take a cue and follow the precedents. When some practice brings in visible outcomes in form of benefits, practitioners become feel encouraged and try to inspire others too.

To sum up, institutionalizing recycling would go a long way, for it would gradually make people get used to this practice. After all, the future of the planet is at stake, and any step taken to ensure it is welcome. 

While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

 

Ielts Essay Agree or Disagree 

With maximizing outputs from workforce being prioritized, many human resource experts have started proposing focusing on  personal attitude of new personnel, instead of resorting to the conventional method of assessing the abilities of workers, based on academic performance and professional exposure. I partially agree with this new way of screening the abilities and selecting workers.

Despite many lobbying for recent changes, relying on conventional methods seem to be more viable in many occupations, where education is considered to be a critical component of ability of personnel to carry out work in their respective realms: academic feats help workers acquaint themselves with the dynamics of  the work they are supposed to do. Even if they are novices, employers do not need to train them from  the very basic level.

Moreover, being well-entrenched with experience in the domain, a worker has been functioning, matters a lot, when it comes to addressing and resolving issues specific to a trade. Many businesses perceive appointing people bereft of any practical exposure as a recipe to disaster. This can hamper not only the efficiency but also expose operations to failure; thus threatening the very existence of an organization.

However, there are certain people who strongly advocate espousing new methods of selecting members of workforce. Many a times, it has been observed that being apt in academics and well-versed with trade exposure fails to guarantee expected outcomes. Workers need to have a optimistic attitude not only towards their own work, and ability to cope up with the pressures within the ambit of the organizational framework, but also coordinate efficiently with their colleagues.

Hence, it is easy to arrive at a conclusion that an efficient workforce needs to be adequately accomplished in academics and experience, as well as having appropriate soft skills.

Most countries develop their economies to improve living standards. Some people are afraid that it will cause degradation of important social values. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Most countries develop their economies to improve living standards. Some people are afraid that it will cause degradation of important social values. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?  

Ielts Essay Economic Development and Social Values 

With a race ensuing for progress, every nation on the planet earth has been pursuing objectives of developing their economies. This though has also led to creating apprehensions in minds of many people who think that the progress is definitely going to cast unholy shadow on the culture and ways of life of society. There are pros and cons associated with progress but progress has more people vouching for it.

The dynamics of enhancement and improvements in an economy’s capacity and productiveness generates new venues for a better and a healthy society that is more aware of its social structure. The societies which choose to remain confined to age old traditions and values often succumb because of the rigid values. It has been historically established that countries having better standard of living stand better chances of preserving their traditions and instead propagating them across the world as has been seen and experienced in case of USA.

Moreover, it is only the development which can create resources for preservation of traditions and traditional thought process as all venues and corners of a developing economy witness a parallel and simultaneous upheaval for e.g. a country like Japan which is known for its age old traditions has developed and sustained its culture successfully and today more and more Japanese are inclined to their cultural thinking.

On other hand. the people who allege that their culture being invaded by development often cite instances of people, especially the young, getting detached from the indigenous customs and succumbing to lifestyles that are deemed unsuitable in specific social perspectives: this detachment from grassroots hinders perpetuation of local beliefs and ways of life, and ultimately demise of a whole social set-up.  

In conclusion, I would rather emphasize that progress has enormous benefits and countries cannot sideline this phenomena in name of preserving traditions and their culture; only continuing development and attaining prosperity can help sustain social and traditional values.