Academic achievement at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Academic achievement at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Education plays an important role in personal development and success in life. However, I do not agree with this statement that the intelligence of a person should be judged on the basis of academic accomplishment.

Many outrightly reject this notion by quoting precedents of several  people being successful even without going to school, or dropping out midway. However, their innate skills and ability to take initiatives and  risks propelled them to triumphs, earning them fame and fortune, leaving the highly accomplished way behind. For instance,  Bill Gates and Elon Musk, to name a few. These individuals although not educated as per modern standards, they set an example in front of those highly qualified individuals. These very individuals employed the highly educated  in the establishments they are running as successful businesses.   

The fact that the level intellect being independent of any educational feats is often observed in the modern technological realms where genius programmers are found developing applications without having any formal qualification. Facebook, one of the biggest social media platforms, has evidenced this by hiring more than forty percent of people who never went to school or college, by virtue of their prodigal abilities. 

Moreover, it is well-known that a large number of students all over the world tend to cheat during their examinations to achieve higher grades and better appraisals than they are capable of. However, a genius may suffer from the anxiety just before the examinations, resulting in poor academic performance, so it will be an injustice to assume him not to be intelligent just because of the particular situation. 

In conclusion, I believe one cannot be judged on their academic exploits, and those harnessing their skill and capabilities efficiently, can earn success with the help of strong resolve and hard work.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

In contemporary times, a large population of urbanites reside in large societies housing apartments. While this arrangement offers umpteen pros,  the cons cannot be overlooked. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will discuss whether the former outshine the latter. 

To begin with, such settings have numerous benefits to offer as people from different cultures come together to celebrate the various festivals and events related to their cultures, creating harmony. The life in these gated areas becomes very easy as one receives all the facilities in the premises of the society only and also does not need to worry about the security related issues. Finding parking for the vehicle is easy unlike other areas. The one who is living in these areas never face the issues related to power cuts and water supply related troubles. 

Moreover, these places are also very cost effective: the prices and rents of the houses here are pocket-friendly. Similarly,  the cost of maintenance is also very low as it is shared among all the residents living in the building. Additionally, the environment is also very peaceful as there is no noise related to traffic and machinery.

Having said that, lack of privacy is a major drawback as every apartment is very close to each other; it is hard to organize get-togethers at home without seeking permission from neighbors. On top of that, one cannot renovate the exterior or interior of the house according to their will since if they want to do so,  they must take permission from society management and their co-habitants. 

To conclude, in my opinion accommodating in these kinds of societies has more advantages as compared to disadvantages as they provide countless facilities and they also have low maintenance.

Many people argue that restaurants should be required to disclose the nutritional information of the dishes they serve. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Many people argue that restaurants should be required to disclose the nutritional information of the dishes they serve.  Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 

Food lovers, nowadays, demand for the nutritional catalogue of the delicacies being served in restaurants. This aspect has both the benefits and drawbacks associated with it, but whether the former exceed the latter is a matter worthy of critical analysis.  

To begin with, displaying the nutritional content on the food servings will help all categories decide on the correct proportions needed from a wide variety of delicacies. The belief that the consumption of non-homemade food by pregnant women and children introduces them to serious health issues will be eliminated, by embracing this concept. Furthermore, this will enable establishments to present themselves as caring for their clientele, augmenting their business. Additionally, many food-oriented research will be conducted to provide correct proportionate weights and its nutrients; and consumers rights will be empowered to raise questions when the nutrients are not matched with quantity and price for the food.  

In contrast, such a proposal, if implemented, will stretch waiting times for serving food to customers waiting at the table, increasing their eagerness towards their order. This will also mandate hotels to recruit additional human resources with qualification and experience in various fields like, nutrition and chemical composition of food. This expenditure will be included in food bills and force consumers to pay indirectly. Moreover, such a policy can only be accomplished only by the premium hotels as other budget hotels cannot afford high investment to support this system. Such imbalance will cause economic disruption as the developing countries mostly depend on the income of mid-range hotels.

To conclude, although this analysis discovered several drawbacks of this proposal, I strongly agree with the viewpoint that pros exceed shortfalls. The suspected shortcomings can be surmounted by adopting prudent policies. 

It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

 It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

A majority believe in saving a lion’s share of their earnings rather than spending it, but there are those who deny this fact and preach consuming it. In my opinion, having reserves is important for future needs, but  nonetheless performing some expenditures is also necessary for enjoying life.

Having more in the form of savings is crucial as this can have a profound impact on the present and the future. For example, with every passing year, inflation is rising and prices are spiraling, making it imperative to create a buffer to cushion for increased cost of living later. Also, Illness is another factor that requires a huge amount of money, as medical facilities are getting expensive day by day and affording them is becoming a luxury for many. Thus, keeping aside something for the rainy day has become the need of the hour as it can render financial stability and assurance of a secure future. This practice and thought has  dominated society since ages, and people have yielded rich benefits.  

However, some are skeptical of the former approach, and profess following a lifestyle which is more relaxed, that entails spending a greater ratio than conserving money. This way of living is more concerned with enjoying life in the present and improving its quality. Such people are wedded to the thought that they have all the privilege to enjoy the exploits of their hard work. Moreover, since  the future is uncertain, there is little rationale to worry about the later years and sacrifice today for tomorrow. 

To conclude, both approaches toward life have their pros and cons, but savings is more crucial for a better and safer future than spending huge amounts on things that will bring no value and contribute towards an unstable future.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

Advantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• A closely knit community that afford opportunities for people to celebrate festivals and events together 

• Convenient life in these gated areas: all facilities are available are within close vicinity 

• No hassles for parking 

• Round the clock power back up and water 

• Unmatched security for dwellers 

• Cost-effective living since the prices and rents are relatively lower; and the cost of maintenance is shared by all

• Peaceful atmosphere 

Disadvantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• Lack of privacy 

• No alterations possible - exterior or interior - without permission 

• No access to rooftop terrace 

Nowadays, although a majority are inclined to living in large gated societies with apartments, for they profess this affords them innumerable benefits, it will be too naive to overlook the detriments such settings bring along.  

To begin with, such accommodation fetches a myriad of benefits: round the clock power and water supply,  shopping facilities, peaceful  environment, and so on. These arrangements have provisions to afford uninterrupted power through their own generation systems and have huge water reservoirs to fulfill the needs of residents. Moreover, by virtue of having outlets within the premises, it is easy to buy for their needs without leaving the safety of their housing society. 

Furthermore, one can experience a quality life in such surroundings; these settings offer services such as parks,gyms and playgrounds for children within their premises. Consequently, saving effort needed to be invested into running from pillar to post to exercise, spend leisure time, or escort little ones to distant parks to allow them to engage in physical endeavors. These factors contribute majorly towards 80% of urbanites, in cities like New York and London, preferring to choose these residential arrangements over privately owned houses. 

However, the pitfalls despite being minuscule, pester those  averse to such settings. They are more concerned about their privacy, something missing in apartments. One cannot enjoy their leisure time, organize noisy parties at their homes since they must take into account the likes and dislikes of their neighbors. Another is the absence of freedom to carry out alterations, it is a far cry to receive approvals from society managements.  

Overall, even though buying or leasing accommodation relies on budgets and choices, life in housing societies come with umpteen benefits and shortcomings; nonetheless, the former effortlessly eclipse the latter. These will prove instrumental in supporting urban living.   

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Can bridging the gap between the elite and the impoverished, as has been suggested by many, work, is a controversial topic. I intend to critically analyze this proposal before drawing a plausible conclusion. 

To begin with, narrowing the income gap can address many root causes of the current pessimistic social environment. When wealth is evenly distributed, it will allow everyone access to essential amenities,  such as healthcare, food, education, and housing, regardless of socioeconomic backgrounds, leading to empowering individuals, rendering them an improved quality of life, and ultimately,  fostering an environment of optimism. Additionally, resulting in reduced societal tensions. Moreover, this will create a form of equality between the income distribution and an individual will not be judged upon their financial conditions. Such economic stability will result in a general sense of well-being and optimism.

However, economic equality alone does not automatically lead to social bonhomie. Other factors, such as cultural values, social networks and personal freedom play a crucial role in determining overall cheerfulness. A truly harmonious society is built not just by financial parity, but a sense of shared responsibility, motivation and individual drive to contribute meaningfully. Additionally, this is a way of pampering those who circumvented working hard, and have not achieved anything in their life. This kind of policy would only help create a class of complacent individuals who will incessantly depend on such support, harming the future of society, and country, as well.  

In conclusion, blurring income gaps can contribute to societal happiness, but it must be a part of broader policy that includes addressing other factors, rather than simply redistributing wealth. A thriving society should encourage both economic productivity and personal growth, ensuring individuals feel valued and are motivated to contribute.

Social media has both advantage and disadvantages for different segments of society

 Social media has both advantage and disadvantages for different segments of society. Discuss and give your opinion in not less than 250 words.

Undeniably, social media offers umpteen benefits to disparate sections of society, but the drawbacks associated with it cannot be overlooked. This essay intends to critically analyze both the aspects and derive a plausible conclusion.

Social  media platforms have helped students, teachers  and other working professionals connect with their counterparts within the same region or across the globe, enabling them to share and exchange views, knowledge, find quick solutions, and broaden their horizons on any given topic. To corroborate, educational institutes and companies utilize applications like X , Linkedin, Instagram, Facebook and academic forums to collaborate and research, sharing innovative ideas and enhancing learner experiences. 

Moreover, the virtual social interaction networks have empowered even the marginalized sections that can now voice their opinions, exhibit their concerns, access services extended by regimes, and advocate for their rights, with the help of online groups belonging to their own communities. For instance, since the inception of social media platforms over a decade ago, significant populations of the destitute in regions like Asia, Africa, and Latin America have found a voice. The internet-based activism has played a crucial role in pressuring governments to take action and implement policies aimed at alleviating the suffering of their impoverished citizens.

On the contrary, despite proving to be extremely beneficial, this innovation  has also raised concerns about users being prone to misinformation, stalking and bullying. To exemplify, there have been many reports stating that individuals have started developing ill-feelings for other communities after falling prey to rumours, promoted on social platforms.

In hindsight, although there are certain challenges that these platforms present: misinformation, their benefits in fostering global connectivity, knowledge sharing, and social empowerment dominate. With responsible usage and proper regulations, this virtual medium can act as a transformative force for individuals and societies worldwide.

Some parents think that helping their children with homework is good. Others think children should do their homework on their own. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some parents think that helping their children with homework is good. Others think children should do their homework on their own. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some believe that affording support to youngsters with their assignments rendered by schools fosters academic success, while others vouch for independent effort cultivating crucial life skills. Both perspectives present valid arguments, and need to be delved deeper into. 

Advocates of parental assistance highlight the benefit of guidance during complex tasks. Mothers and fathers often possess the experience and knowledge to clarify difficult concepts, making learning more efficient and helping young ones manage their time. For instance, lending a hand in mathematics and science projects can ensure accuracy and deepen understanding of young minds since they can communicate their concerns and weaknesses effortlessly in an informal environment. Additionally, this involvement strengthens the family connections, as joint effort can create opportunities for communication and bonding. Youngsters may also feel more confident tackling assignments, preparing time tables which ultimately, help appreciating the fact that their parents have invested in and contributed to their academic progress.

Nevertheless,  those lobbying for personal engagement of youngsters in negotiating tasks extended by schools, assert that familial help can hinder self resilience and critical thinking. When young minds rely on constant assistance, they may struggle to develop problem solving abilities and time management skills. For example, completing an essay independently teaches youngsters  to organize thoughts and articulate ideas. Allowing them to face challenges fosters perseverance, preparing them for future responsibilities. Furthermore, some might inadvertently provide solutions, undermining the educational process and leading to children circumventing exploration on their own. 

In conclusion, both viewpoints emphasize important aspects of learning. While parental help with homework can be valuable in specific situations, cultivating independence remains essential for the development of tender minds. Striking a balance between guidance and self initiative ensures that children grow into capable, confident individuals equipped to face future challenges.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

The contemporary urban landscape has radically evolved to predominantly towering apartment blocks that house a significant portion of the population. This shift towards vertical living has prompted discussions about the merits and drawbacks of this arrangement that shall be compared in the following paragraphs.  

With city spaces becoming extremely limited and urban populations swelling,  residing in large apartment complexes has  become a vogue due to several causes. This discussion delves into the multifaceted nature of this living arrangement, exploring the myriad benefits it offers, and the potential drawbacks that one might encounter. 

Such residential settings permit efficient use of urban space, accommodating a colossal number of people within a smaller area,  bringing down the cost and rents of housing units, making surviving in cities affordable. Also, since the maintenance is taken care of by the management and is shared, one is not needed to pay out of their nose, causing the cost of leaving to plummet.

Moreover, amenities such as gyms, swimming pools, common areas, and even rooftop gardens, which may be expensive or impractical to have in single-family homes are easily accessible. Similarly, owing to their location within the close vicinity of urban centers, these locations afford easy access to workplaces, entertainment, shopping, and public transportation. Above all, one cannot deny that enhanced security measures like controlled access, surveillance cameras, and doormen, extend an unmatched sense of safety, especially for children, engendering a carefree environment. 

Nevertheless, it will be too naive to overlook the downsides of such an arrangement. It is hard for large families to accommodate comfortably; and shared walls with others robs one of privacy, exposing them to noise from the neighborhood. Additionally, restrictions on the renovation and personalizing decor for the facade is out of bounds, turning the outlook of homes monotonous. 

Overall, even though it is always a personal preference of each individual to choose the space for their living according to their budget and aspirations, apartments fetch unrivaled upsides that eclipse the pitfalls. This system holds promises that will bolster urban sprawl. 

 

Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play at home and play Until they are six or seven years old. others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play at home and play Until they are six or seven years old. others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible.  Discuss both views and give your opinion.

An army of people have started professing that young ones should start schooling once they attain the age of six or seven, while others dissent and want this phase to begin as soon as possible. Following paragraphs will delve deeper on both the view points and share the opinion.

To begin with, youngsters under the age seven have a curious mind to absorb the learning being taught in the school without any hesitation, and assimilate easily with the school environment, ideally preparing them for the future schooling days faster. Discipline injected before aforementioned age can lay the foundation for successful schooling, and their brains can be trained easily to avoid diversion and concentrate only on the educational endeavors. For instance, once the child has practiced completing the assignments provided at the school within the given deadline, in their inquisitive stage,  will always comply with deadlines in the future, a paramount expectation from all learners. 

In contrast, juveniles less than the age six or seven have just started experiencing their surroundings and need time to comprehend the family atmosphere that will teach them about feelings, respecting elders and other non-academic learnings. Moreover, little ones, before turning 6, are unable to communicate the basic requirements like food, water and biological necessities while exposing them to strangers that can heighten the risk of health issues. 

Similarly, balanced nutrition is a critical factor to avoid issues related to both physical and mental well being, which can be ensured by mothers and fathers. Additionally, many developed nations like Japan, have started adopting this practice based on the study that early schooling exacerbates stress levels affecting retention power at the later stage of life.

Overall, even though sending youngsters to formal tuition may fetch certain benefits,  it is likely to bring in more drawbacks as little ones might feel alienated and also be unable to  interact with their new surroundings effectively.  Thus, they should commence schooling only after once they grow up to be at least six. 

The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this tech-savvy world, a group of people propound that young minds are best decision makers and more suitable for managerial roles; however, others believe experienced supervisors are more proficient for such tasks. This essay shall delve deeper into this matter and draw a plausible conclusion.

Many believe young adults are broad-minded, energetic, tech savvy and quick decision makers. They can effortlessly set precedents for their subordinates, and are open to feedback from their juniors. Similarly, by virtue of being educated in an environment influenced by modern concepts and technology, they can engage modern methods and technology for making quick decisions and ensuring well-being of working staff. To corroborate a survey by Times that reveals that a majority of personnel are comfortable working under young individuals; they experience better workplace culture, and their suggestions are welcomed by top management.  

Nevertheless, some  argue that leadership qualities can only be augmented with seasoning: those who have been through the thick and thin can plan and manage effectively. Old executives are well-organized and possess expertise in their subject matter, which is a boon for both organization and human resources. Moreover, they have a pragmatic vision and their accomplishments help them make accurate predictions. Workers supervised by them feel assured, inquisitive and gain valuable experience from by operating under their aegis. According to one study, organizations facing operational challenges prefer to hire personnel in their forties or fifties, in principal roles as their involvement can be beneficial for the growth of business and staff. 

Overall, I partially concur with this notion, for where the business needs to embrace modern technology like IT, those in their young age can effectively lead from the front, but when it comes to strategic forays, older workers are more suitable for governance.   

People’s behaviour varies from country to country. When traveling to a different country, people should copy the behaviour and habits of the inhabitants of the country they visit. Do you agree or disagree?

 People’s behaviour varies from country to country. When traveling to a different country, people should copy the behaviour and habits of the inhabitants of the country they visit. Do you agree or disagree?

Yes 

• To be accepted by locals more closely “When in Rome, do as Roman do”, rendering them a chance to look at the host ways of life more closely 

• THis can also prevent them from offending local aspirations 

• Protection from becoming victims of crimes 

No 

• Against the globalized  ethos: those visiting are there to experience diversity and not abandon their own beliefs.   

• Harboring hostile attitudes may hamper the reputation of the country and keep visitors away: affecting the tourism badly, and earnings in foreign exchange 

• Affecting the relationships between societies 

Many suggest that those undertaking journeys to diverse regions of the globe must embrace the ways of the life of the host society. This proposal is quite prudent, and promises rich experiences to those visiting alien surroundings 

To begin with, making adjustments in the attitude to complement the native lifestyles of the destination can help  visitors prevent themselves from becoming the subject of wrath(anger) of the locals, and instead being accepted more readily by the latter; they feel that their customs have been acknowledged. This can precipitate(result in creating ) a conducive environment, wherein one can explore differences and also uniqueness of the culture being visited, and create nostalgic memories, thereby fulfilling the fundamental purpose of travelling. Several travelogues written by avid backpackers (keen travellers ) clearly highlight the relevance of this aspects as most were well-received by people of countries they went to simply because they followed local traditions and even etiquettes.

On top of that, following this strategy can be of great avail to the ones visiting other parts of the world by virtue of safeguarding them from criminal activities and unwarranted situations. It has been often observed that foreign travellers tend to become easy victims of petty crimes, or overcharging.  However, familiarising oneself with ways endemic to the destination nation such as wearing the local attire, learning and using the local dialect, and so forth, allows mingling with natives effortlessly, and being treated equally. A growing number report that when they behaved the same way, a national would do, illegal elements stayed away and the shopkeepers treated them with respect and with equality.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that when in Rome, do as Romans do,so that one can enjoy their travel, experience the customs and traditions of host societies more closely.

Intro 1:- In times, when more and more are undertaking journeys to diverse regions of the globe their conduct has come under a critical scanner, and many suggest that they should embrace the ways of life of the host society. Although some challenge this practice, I believe that this is the most prudent way of experiencing an alien surrounding. Intro 2 :- Of late, a suggestion has surfaced that those undertaking journeys to diverse regions of the globe must embrace the ways of life of the host society.I concur with this proposal, and shall elucidate reasons to validate(support/bolster/augment) my stand/stance in the following paragraphs. Intro 3:-

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

The attitudes towards tourism being a form of  imperialism are ambivalent; there are sections that affirm that this sector is bringing several accolades for the nation, while others feel it is engendering environmental issues. In this essay, I shall elucidate my stance on this matter by deliberating upon the various aspects of this industry.

At the outset, those rallying behind this notion base their rationale on the fact that tourism brings forth people from diverse cultures and ethnicities together, empowering harmony between disparate communities, and promulgating bonhomie. Moreover, in order to  cater to the growing need of the industry, many professions have been founded, especially in the hospitality and transportation sector . This has seen multifold increment in the employment opportunities for the masses and bringing colossal revenue owing to the tourist developments leading to generating monetary benefits. 

However, the opponents might argue that tourism leads to expanding carbon footprint and tourists act in an irresponsible manner by creating a menace by littering around and defacing places.Nevertheless, this underlying notion can be challenged as the benefits reaped from this industry are umpteen: Owing to this, invaluable foreign exchange is being generated leading to reforming economies. More and more tourist destinations are being developed, making people aware and proud of their own cultural heritage.

Therefore, it can be asserted that this industry has witnessed an unprecedented influx of tourists in the contemporary times and aids in fetching unmatched yields such as facilitating cultural exchange, development of infrastructure, and generating sumptuous revenue.

Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day, while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day, while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people feel that children should not be given homework? Why? 

• Children are already stressed out since there is a lack of extracurricular activities in schools due to academic pressure, adding home assignments to the itinerary can make things harder for them. 

• Home assignments rob the youngsters of the time they could invest in other activities: sports, socializing with family and friends 

• Can have detrimental effects on their health as doing homework would promote sedentary lifestyles. 

• They never get a chance to develop other critical skills: lifeskills, social skills  

• 
  

Some people feel that children should be given homework? Why? 

• Doing homework lets children consolidate whatever has been imparted at the school 

• If they encounter doubts while doing assignments at home, they can know that and seek clarification the next day.  

• They get a chance to learn and study independently in an environment  that sans  guidance of teachers 

• This also lets them stay connected with the studies 

Home assignments being afforded on a daily basis has evoked mixed responses: while a school of thought is skeptical of this practice and demands discontinuation, others want to perpetuate it. 

Those  disapproving of this exercise found/base their opinion on the humongous stress young school goers have to bear day after day by virtue of demanding academic routines at school, wherein they get few opportunities to destress themselves. The situation worsens/exacerbates when they are handed over work for home, robbing them of little time they are left with to engage in extracurricular activities/endeavors such as playing sports and participating in other undertakings that can help them relax and rejuvenate, ensuring augmenting there mental and physical health. 

Similarly, easing up this burden can allow some spare time for juveniles to learn about other more essential things such as socializing with their peers and friends; behaving politely with others; and practicing their hobbies to discover their creative persona. This can help them grow up as rational and well-informed adults, capable of leading a successful life in social, personal and familial realms. 

Nevertheless, several educationalists advocate sustaining this regime  since it allows pupils in a myriad/several of ways: students can consolidate whatever they learn in the classroom on a given day by repeating at their home; they can discover the gaps in their learning that they can clarify following day; and develop in attitude to study independently, which could foster habit of exploring topics without external assistance.

Overall, it can be asserted that even though homework is essential for effective education, giving it day after day can deprive young minds of chances to learn other essential traits. Thus, this should be discontinued.    

Overall, after assessing both the sides of the coin, it can be asserted that even though homework is essential for effective education, giving it day after day can deprive young minds of chances to learn other essential traits. Thus, this should be discontinued.    

Nowadays many people are trying to earn more and more to get rich. What are the advantages and disadvantages of being rich?

Nowadays many people are trying to earn more and more to get rich. What are the advantages and disadvantages of being rich?

In contemporary times, a school of thought believes that it is good that  a majority population is making efforts to amass as much wealth as possible since it fetches umpteen favors. But, others feel that it has numerous pitfalls. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss both the aspects.

To start with, many think there are numerous benefits of being affluent as with money one can make their life very comfortable by affording all luxuries that a person can dream of. Also, it is possible to secure the future and of the upcoming generation as they can have a proper plan and things to grow their financial resources. Similarly, the rich can provide themselves with safeguards for the times of emergency such as when there is a crisis, or any other type of problem. Additionally, prosperity also brings respect in the society as it places the elite in the superior category and also governments are with them since the latter also get help from the former in form of funds whenever required for development of the country.

In contrast,  having a lot of wealth is also a cause of problems as it brings a lot of stress. There are innumerable chances of robbery, or kidnapping as sumptuous money is dangerous as others become jealous. Furthermore, the wealthy also become arrogant and do not treat others with respect since they think they are more superior. Apart from that, it is commonly seen that those with an abundance of financial resources become greedy to earn more and more  

To conclude, prosperity has both sides which the elite has to face. Therefore, the prosperous must always be careful in enjoying the benefits and also planning to overcome problems associated with being elite.  

Politicians are more responsible for the protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Politicians are more responsible for the protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Why governments 

• They enjoy the jurisdiction over the land and  have been vested with powers to make laws and create a framework to persuade (with help of punitive measures) or coax (encouragement) people into following eco-friendly policies. 

• They have the resources - both money and manpower to handle task of such a greater  multitude. 

• Environment is not confined to a limited area, so it is the regime that can ensure prevent exacerbation the condition

• They also have a clear view of the impending catastrophes due to being in possession of expert resources. 

• They have been allocated  the  responsibility of creating a sound living condition for the populace 

   Or citizens? Why (not what they are doing)

• It is them who are actually creating a mess and if they act responsibly, the evil will be nipped in its bud. It is their requirements that is setting the whole system of creating pollution into movement 

• If inhabitants fail to comply nothing will be effective 

• They are a basic unit of society and if they come together, they can push the state to establish policies. 

• History has been a witness that when individuals take initiative, others follow the precedents:  

Should it be the lawmakers taking the ownership in mitigating environmental deterioration, or should citizens also play their part in this endeavor, is a matter that needs to be profoundly evaluated.  

NEHA 

Contemporary times are facing the biggest jeopardy, the planet losing its vitality, making it imperative to take steps to halt the deterioration. Thus, experts spar over who has a greater role to play in this undertaking, while some put the onus of policymakers, others feel the populace cannot escape this responsibility.  

The state enjoys the jurisdiction to create and enforce eco-friendly policies and regulations at large. These laws can have a significant impact on industries, resource management, and conservation efforts, for the statutes are backed by abundant resources such as monetary, expertise and manpower, to assure desirable outcomes. On top of that, strict deployment of stipulations can make everyone fall in line since no one, a business or a private citizen would like to be handed down a penalty or punishment, persuading everyone to follow the designed norms.  

Nevertheless, some commentators think that the citizens  can help create a better and sustainable environment around their neighborhood, since if they take the onus, the evil can be nipped in its bud. To corroborate, embracing eco-friendly practices, such as recycling, and reducing energy consumption, at household level, can go a long way in surmounting the impending ecological catastrophe. Moreover, they can also influence political priorities and agendas. For instance, in 2000, consumer forums of the EU prevailed upon their regime to bring in laws to prescribe use of such chemicals to color fabrics and clothing, that harmed the planet, and the latter were forced to create such policies, helping protect water bodies where the residue was discharged after producing coloring material. . 

Overall,  the mantle of protecting the environment should be donned by both parties. Effective environmental protection stipulates a balance between government policies, regulations, and individual actions; a collaborative approach is essential to address the complex environmental challenges.