Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students should be encouraged to question and offer criticisms on their teachers. Others think this will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students should be encouraged to question and offer criticisms on their teachers. Others think this will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

It has been suggested by many experts that secondary school learners should be rendered some liberty to question their tutors as this could help in better learning, but nonetheless others argue that this is likely to prove counterproductive, so this practice should not be permitted.

Nowadays,  many have been contesting that learners in secondary schools should be rendered some latitude to challenge their tutors. Nonetheless, others dissent with this notion and suggest that this might make classroom management a difficult task. 

The  suggestion for affording freedom to pupils to criticize and quiz teaching staff gains support from the assumption that this would make school education more meaningful. Pupils are on the verge of graduating to higher studies where they are likely to encounter a plethora of content and diverse teaching attitudes, and providing them with this privilege at school would fuel their courage and propensity to challenge something they do not comprehend well. 

Moreover, those rallying behind this idea also profess that this would also help learners to clarify their doubts from the faculty on the issues they usually stumble across during lessons, but choose to remain silent fearing retribution and ridicule from the latter, making education more interactive and interesting for all. Similarly, the teaching professionals would also get an opportunity to make adjustments in their imparting strategies and corrections in their attitudes. 

However, despite the former opinion being hailed as progressive, its impact will result in unwarranted consequences and the implementation of this proposal will backfire. The advantage of such an arrangement will surely be taken by unruly students, using the opportunity to clarify their doubts as a pretext to undermine teachers and disrupt the proceedings of the class. Additionally, this will also dampen the confidence and spirit of tutors and interfere with their task of disseminating knowledge effectively. 

Overall, I strongly feel that the scholastic environment needs those getting education to be disciplined and also respect those providing them with knowledge. Nevertheless, allowing such a system to prevail will kill the very objective and meaning of schooling. 

Part time courses are on the rise and students are taking them up as an alternative to full time courses. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

 Part time courses are on the rise and students are taking them up as an alternative to full time courses. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Distance learning is fast becoming a new normal, as growing numbers are opting for this method of garnering skills, and is affording umpteen benefits. However, it remains to be seen whether pros of this pattern exceed the traditional educational pattern.  

Undeniably, this method of acquiring skills, especially professional, has ushered in an era of great convenience for those engaged in overwhelming professional routines but need to augment their targeted competence in their field of specialization. Now, they can effortlessly enroll and educate themselves in the required area of specialization aligned with the future goals and ambitions without compromising their work and current obligations. It has been observed that most highly placed professionals have been able to chart their ascent to the top management by embracing this way of bolstering their academic credentials. 

Moreover, one can evade entrance tests and steep competition for meager offerings of regular study and instead embark upon their endeavor of obtaining knowledge of the realm they want to advance in. To corroborate, in countries like India facing a dearth of places in traditional institutional set-up by virtue of rising population, more and more learners are reaping rich dividends extended by such a system and circumventing the stress of additional tests. 

Nevertheless, the shortfalls often quoted, despite being less convincing, reflect the fears that learners might not be able cultivate required dexterity in their domain as compared to their counterparts studying full-time, for they give a chance to meet industry experts, participate in field work, and learn about diverse approaches, a miss.  

Overall, although there are some pitfalls of studying in such settings, there are benefits galore like flexibility and lack of competition, and thus, easily outshine the former. This way of gaining knowledge is bound to become ubiquitous in the future. 

Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your opinion and examples from your experience.

 Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your opinion and examples from your experience.

In contemporary times,  the focus seems to be shifting towards protecting wild flora and fauna, and putting other programs on the backseat. This has evoked a fierce debate whether this shift will fetch favorable, or unfavorable outcomes.       

To begin with, there is widespread optimism being expressed by various  quarters: it has become possible to ensure the continued existence of the human race on this planet. This policy is likely to help in sustaining a precarious balance of the ecology: both animals and plants are an integral part of the environment and food chain, and if one of them disappears, others will follow soon, jeopardizing the safety of mankind itself since this will allow the population of harmful beings to flourish and expose people to various hazards. 

To corroborate, extensive hunting  of wild birds in China during the 1960s, on the pretext that they were a threat to the crops, precipitated into an uncontrolled rise in the number of locusts that eventually destroyed thousands of acres of crop bearing farmlands, and caused a famine. This resulted in millions dying from starvation.

However, there are some counter views to this that point at the pitfalls this shift has brought along despite these being often termed as a fickle imagination, the most prominent being drying out of financial support for other more essential initiatives that  target rendering essential amenities to those in need of food, education, employment, healthcare and above all, clean drinking water. This could hamper the progress of society in the long run, as the skeptics assume. 

Overall, disputes  aside, despite some fears being expressed about the non-existent darker side of this policy, it is quite prudent to assert that humans will only survive if their co-inhabitants do, and for that the damage must be undone. 

Nowadays, as a part of the education process, students work at a company for a short period of time without pay. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, as a part of the education process, students work at a company for a short period of time without pay. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In contemporary times, internship has become an integral part of the curriculum of university education and other training programs, where learners are made to work without compensation. While this process has umpteen benefits to offer, there are certain failings too.

Internship programs, where learners are not paid anything for their work, form an integral part of modern educational curriculum. This process is populated by both merits and demerits;however, it remains to be seen whether the former overshadows the latter. 

Unpaid internship programs form an integral part of modern educational curriculum. This process is populated by both merits and demerits;however, it remains to be seen whether the former overshadows the latter. 

Industrial  training affords a major advantage to young learners: they can obtain an exposure of the professional work environment in person that turns out to be far more enriching than grasping the knowledge from books and manuals. Such endeavors have the potential to inform and train prospective graduates about critical interpersonal skills they are going to need essentially to integrate successfully and effectively with an existing workforce, rendering a myriad of benefits to both the trainees and prospective employers, with the former becoming disciplined and the latter not needing to expend extensively on training fresh graduates. 

Similarly, such undertakings can perform another important function, helping pupils discover and determine their natural inclination in the area that they would like to take up as their profession once they complete their studies. This can be corroborated by citing the outcomes of a study carried out by professor Harmeet Singh, University of Toronto that revealed that over 70% of skilled professionals successfully finalized their occupations through such programmes in the last two decades.

Nevertheless, even though quite inconsequential in impact, one has to bear expenses of traveling to the site and back along with the food. This can be an expensive proposition for those belonging to not so well-off families. Besides this, participating in such initiatives can also sometimes turn out to be stressful as students are subjected to handling their work and studies simultaneously.

Overall, I strongly feel that the advantages extended by such schemes eclipse their pitfalls as these prepare soon to graduate youngsters, to take up their careers with enthusiasm and also efficiently. 

In many societies, there is a growing emphasis on sustainable living and reducing environmental impact. What are the challenges of adopting a sustainable lifestyle? What practical actions can individuals take to contribute to sustainability?

 In many societies, there is a growing emphasis on sustainable living and reducing environmental impact. What are the challenges of adopting a sustainable lifestyle? What practical actions can individuals take to contribute to sustainability?

Deteriorating ecological conditions have proven to be a canary in the mines, and enlightened mankind to work in attaining a sustainable environment. However, this task is fraught with umpteen challenges, but all is not lost, and a lot can be done at individual level to circumvent an otherwise imminent catastrophe. 

Deteriorating ecological conditions have proven to be a canary in the mines, and enlightened mankind to work in attaining a sustainable environment. However, this task is fraught with umpteen challenges, yet a lot can be done at individual level to circumvent an otherwise imminent catastrophe. 

The task of reversing the damage to the planet is, undeniably, of a gargantuan dimension, with a steeply rising global population stipulating harnessing more and  more natural resources, and bringing increasing swathes of land under human occupation for industrial and agricultural use - with the latter being supported by extensive use of chemically synthesized fertilizers and pesticides. By virtue of this, eschewing unsustainable ways and embracing policies to erect safeguards against further degradation of surroundings seems to be a far cry and carries little motivation. 

Similarly, the populace that has surrendered to the temptation of leading a life of pleasure fueled by technology such as cars, plastic - used in various spheres of life and diverse manifestations, and so on, faces a daunting task of discovering affordable alternatives promising affordability with little modifications. This can also be partly attributed to absence of resources, expertise and above all, enlightenment. 

Nevertheless, the table can be turned on adversities provided diverse demographies should take the matter in their own hands by switching to a minimalist lifestyle: reducing their unnecessary consumption and use of cars; banishing plastics from their life and surroundings; and saving energy and water by using these  resources prudently. These steps can go a long way in preserving the vitality of the environment.    

Overall, several limitations impede the progress of the undertakings aimed at ensuring an enduring environment, but no stone should be left unturned, for only this endeavor can ensure perpetuation of life on the earth. Thus, society should spring into action.  

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a common perception that only policy makers are having the capability of finding solutions to the crisis caused by paucity(shortage) of residential units in urban locales. This notion, however, is challenged by several quarters.

Undeniably,  governments are vested with the powers to enact laws to afford benefits to citizens. On a similar note, they can create provisions to affect changes in bye-laws governing the land use. For example, in cities like Delhi, when the authorities realized that inhabitants were facing a steep scarcity of residential units, and prices and rents of property were spiraling out of control, they sprang into the action and responded by dismantling old low-rise housing units and converting certain commercial areas with derelict buildings into the residential ones. Such undertakings helped in mitigating the issue upto a certain level.

Similarly, regimes also enjoy the jurisdiction of developing residential areas on the outer fringes and in suburbs that can help ease the burden of population on urban areas. This task requires involvement of multitude of infrastructural development and expertise that can exclusively be arranged by the state. Sub-cities like Gurugram, Dubai, Goyang and Montpellier, to name a few, are some of the successful examples of initiatives taken by the local governing bodies.

Nevertheless, although not supported by a strong rationale, some suggest that this task is not the lone responsibility of politicians, even citizens can play a role by forming forums to foster public opinion and force urban planners to create policies that can aid in arranging more and more accommodations for urbanites.  

To recap, controversies apart, only the state machinery has the competence to provide efficient and bespoke solutions for this monumental challenge as  piecemeal efforts and initiatives are likely to culminate into a chaos. ‘

 

Some experts say for road safety cyclists should pass a test before being allowed on public roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Some experts say for road safety cyclists should pass a test before being allowed on public roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? 

Of late, a common perception has been emerging that those pedaling must prove their eligibility before using common motorways. Even though this proposal seems to be agreeable, it is necessary to analyze the rationale behind it critically.

There  is a skeptical view that challenges this notion and terms  it as regressive. Such a move will only cause chaos as it will become hard to decide at what age one must undergo the licensing process: currently, everyone, regardless of their age, is allowed to pedal anywhere. However, after implementation of this policy, minors might be barred from using main roads and forced to remain confined to the residential areas only. Consequently, besides becoming dependent on others for negotiating their daily chores, they could also get encouraged to lead a sedentary lifestyle, by virtue of being condemned to travel by automobiles on main roads.

Nevertheless,  those supporting this suggestion cite safety of road users as a motivation for making the testing of cyclists before affording them the liberty to use public roadways. It has been observed that there has been a phenomenal increase in road mishaps involving these individuals; a majority of such incidents can be attributed to their erratic behavior, stemming from their lack of knowledge of road rules and etiquette. This can be corroborated by referring to the data of accidents caused by cyclists in cities like Chandigarh where unpredictable maneuvers by these individuals led to road fatalities, especially of those riding two-wheelers. Thus, those cycling must prove their awareness of road safety norms before entering the main motorways. 

Overall, controversies apart, I vehemently feel that such an arrangement should be put into effect urgently; this would help in making roads safe for all and prevent bicycle riders from becoming a cause of accidents.

Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. Discuss and share your opinion.

Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. Discuss and share your opinion.

Global tourism, despite being a major money-spinner for many economies across the globe has failed to stay out of controversy of it being an activity that is promoting discord among diverse cultures. But, this view is not held by another lobby.

To start with, those skeptical of this activity cite some sporadic incidents to tarnish the image of this industry. Most of such events usually take place due to the lack of familiarization of alien visitors with the local customs and ways of life. However, it has been seen that today most travellers before departing from their home country, tend to inform themselves about the culture of hosts so that they can avoid uncomfortable circumstances and also the wrath of host citizens.

Nevertheless,   the real picture is far from what is painted by the critics of tourism. As per them, tourists have become a medium of conveying messages of friendship and harmony that they carry from their own countries to the destination societies. They do not only enthusiastically absorb the information about distinct cultures from alien surroundings but also impart knowledge of their ways of life among the host citizens, who in turn accept those in a friendly manner, fostering a sense of brotherhood among both. 

Similarly, the economic perspective attached to this activity renders it an essential role of bridging gaps between civilizational fault lines. When aliens travel to a society, they generate employment and business for the hosts by virtue of which they are received by natives warmly, aiding in fostering bonhomie between the former and the latter.

In hindsight, quite contrary to the allegations levelled by the cynical lobby, arrival of foreign tourists in a country paves way for fomenting harmonious relationships between diverse nationalities and ethnicities, rather than fomenting a rift.    

Some people feel that entertainers are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of job should be highly paid?

 Some people feel that entertainers are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of job should be highly paid?      

The entertainment industry has always received limelight and as a result there is a lot of money invested on the talent supporting this realm. These current payouts are highly inflated in comparison to the time invested, as per the popular opinion goes. Some also extend their suggestions about other occupations that should receive astronomical sums.   

Over the past few decades, the entertainment industry has commanded a premium over many other professions. This has been fueled by the need for the general population to worship celebrities. This has given the entertainers a free hand to demand for money and has gone unchecked for far too long. The situation has reached a stage where there is no correlation between the hours of work and the associated rewards.

The critics are up in arms against the sky-high earnings of those engaged in various domains connected to entertainment, be it actors, singers, musicians or players. As per their view, these individuals are hardly doing anything that can benefit society. The wealth they amass, as a result of their popularity, sets wrong precedents for the society, especially the youth who are also swayed by the riches and abandon their occupations and goals that could help them harness their talent  and afford several benefits for society.

There is a unanimous view from various sections of society that rally behind the idea of raising the compensation of those engaged in certain professions that are essential  and help build a society: public service, medical professionals, teachers, and charity workers to name a few. These professionals focus on building, serving, and saving lives and have a direct impact on the lives of many individuals. A survey by National Youth daily, brought forth a shocking statistic that over 80% of young individuals have steered clear of fields including public services  and medicine simply because there is a scope to earn more money with minimum efforts which include entertainment. This has also led to an increase in people shifting from trades that are pivotal to development to entertainment. 

In conclusion, there is absolutely no reason that professionals from the entertainment industry should be paid colossally. Other  professions that enjoy strategic importance for a nation should receive more monetary credit. This would create an equal opportunity and the rewards will not be accorded to a particular set of industries alone.

Global warming is one of the major issues facing the world. What are the reasons for this, and what can governments and individuals do to tackle this issue.

Global warming is one of the major issues facing the world. What are the reasons  for this, and what can governments and individuals do to tackle this issue.

The ever rising consumption of fossil fuels is causing the world to become warmer. The following paragraphs shall assess the attributes of this issue, and also suggest some ways to halt it.

To begin with, the heightening of global warming can be easily attributed to the rising emission of wet gasses such as carbon monoxide and dioxide, and methane, to name a few. This increment stems from the primarily rising number of vehicles on the road and the emissions caused by burning of petrol, coal and gas. Besides this, the rise in the number of air conditioners and refrigerators by every household became the source for the origin of gasses such as cholo-floro carbon that ultimately is heating environment. Additionally, the growing number of industries produce heat and different types of pollution that are responsible for increasing temperatures. Moreover, the cutting of trees releases the carbon contained in them and limits the ability of nature to regulate carbon content in the atmosphere.

Surmounting this challenge is contingent on switching to public transport and electric vehicles to mitigate emissions of carbon monoxide and  dioxide, gasses that contribute greatly to global warming. Similarly, for shorter distances they should walk or pedal. Efforts should be invested in cutting down production of electricity, so that discharge of greenhouse gasses can be alleviated. For example, using LED bulbs and energy efficient electrical appliances; and minimizing the use of washing machines, air-conditioners, and other household equipment will bring down the need to produce electricity, thereby helping in  alleviating the usage of coal,oil and gas for producing power. 

To recap, it is the combined effort of governments and inhabitants that can help control the usage of natural fuels, electricity, and help ease the problem of global warming to a great extent.  

Some countries are considering imposing curfews in which teenagers will not be allowed outdoors at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this policy?

 Some countries are considering imposing curfews in which teenagers will not be allowed outdoors at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this policy?

In recent years, there are several government bodies that are considering extreme policies to curtail crime targeted at a certain section of the demographic. While this is being driven to change a very grim reality in the current environment, the intent and possible outcomes of implementing such policies needs to be investigated in greater detail.

Over time, there has been an extremely sharp increase in crime rates in multiple countries. A policy of such nature can help ensure there is a discipline cultivated with young adults from an early age. This could also help them to utilize their time more efficiently on academic activities. It will also help them with improved awareness in areas where crime rates against children are high. In case there are policies which come into effect, a sense of fear which would be established with criminals. Another unintentional advantage would be that teens would also be restricted from social situations where they may be subjected to peer pressure to explore alcohol and other substances at a young age.

However, studies have long demonstrated that children who are subjected to multiple restrictions growing up, often tend to display extreme rebellion in their teens which carries on to their adulthood as well. This could result in incriminating behavior proving to be counterproductive. This could have a detrimental impact on the society if a whole section of the demographic grows up in this manner. Restricting teenagers indoors can also increase their dependence on the internet and devices which can result in an introvert mentality being developed in social situations in the long run.

In conclusion, there are multiple reasons to carefully consider implementing such a policy in countries which see a need. It may have an immediate effect in reducing crime rates. The tradeoff highlighted through the policy, can have an immediate impact to make cities a safer place for the citizens and build the confidence as well.

Globalization has many positives but its negative effects should also not be ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Globalization has many positives but its negative effects should also not be ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Even though globalization has afforded innumerable benefits, it has also drawn rampant criticism as the skeptical lobby suggests that it will not be prudent to disregard the pitfalls of this arrangement.

Those cynical of this new world order suggest that it is obliterating weaker cultures and economies, and compare it to neo-colonialism: a method to gain cultural and political dominance. The youth of impoverished societies are lured by global aspirations which reflect the ways of life of affluent parts of the world, and tend to abandon their native beliefs, exposing the latter to extinction. Moreover, the juggernaut of technology and investments brought in by businesses from rich nations is leading to demise of local entrepreneurial skills of the poor economies, making the latter susceptible to economic dependence on the former.

Notwithstanding the fears expressed by the critics, a highly globalized world has yielded rich dividends in various forms that gives compelling reasons to brush aside any apprehensions. It has now become possible for consumers across the world  to procure and consume any kind of products and services, like Apple Iphones and cheap air travel, at affordable costs within their own countries since they are delivered at their door steps. 

Similarly, this setting has raised the hopes of establishing harmonious relationships across diverse cultures and ethnicities by virtue of promoting effortless communications through the internet. Contemporary inhabitants of the planet communicate  with their counterparts without inhibitions, facilitating conducive dialogue and bonhomie, helping engender universal brotherhood and mitigate possibilities of altercations and war. 

Overall, although the cynicism is not unfounded, they can be overlooked for the sake of the larger interest of humanity as this phenomenon promulgates principles of coexistence, and any detrimental impact can be eliminated by embracing judicious policies to perpetuate cultural and economic freedom. 

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this modern era, a school of thought propounds that diminishing the earning difference between affluent and poverty-stricken sections of the society can lead to a pleasurable environment. Some people support this statement, whereas others oppose it.

To embark upon this discussion, it is believed by a plethora of people that economic parity can bring happiness as everyone will be able to lead a comfortable life and fulfill their needs. Furthermore, a sense of equality will decrease conflicts among different sections. On top of that, it will help in the reduction of crimes and motivate inhabitants to use their leisure time productively. Also, one can secure their future endeavors like education and access to better healthcare facilities in their twilight years, to name a few.

Notwithstanding the former statement, some people profess that if economic parity was the key to a content environment, most societies guaranteeing equality in distribution of monetary resources would fare much higher on the happiness index. There are some other essential views that are needed for a happy social environment, like crime free society, that provides safety from criminals as everyone will be scared of living in that nation. Moreover, with gender disparities and cultural differences, and so on, existing in a country, one cannot feel content and happy. To corroborate, citizens of a communist bloc nations felt that their civil liberties were not fulfilled, due to which they felt uncontented and left their country to migrate to parts of the world affording freedom where their rights were respected and given equal importance.

To conclude, I strongly disagree that considering economic parity only will ensure a congenial and harmonious society since there are various other factors which let happiness pervade through social fabric. 

More and more people are getting overweight. Some people think that increasing the price of fattening food items can solve this problem. Do you agree or disagree?

More and more people are getting overweight. Some people think that increasing the price of fattening food items can solve this problem. Do you agree or disagree?

Whether making edible items that lead to obesity can help surmount this challenge, is an intriguing question. There is humongous skepticism about the rationale behind this proposal.  

Proponents of the price rise assume that the high cost of fattening food would affect its affordability and take it out of the reach of many, especially the youngsters, the most devoted consumers of such edible items. This segment would have to either opt for economical options that can ill-afford to offer expensive greasy ingredients, or choose healthy home-cooked meals, reducing the incidence of corpulence naturally. 

Nevertheless, the reality is far from being so rosy: the consumption of the food with sumptuous fat content is sometimes the only alternative for the overworked people - engaged in work for extended hours at office, or dedicated to their academic pursuits. Consequently, compelling them to opt for the most readily available nourishment, regardless of the cost, and consume it, whenever they confront the pangs of hunger.  

Similarly, blaming fattening food for obesity is only a knee-jerk reaction and overlooking the primary cause. Corpulence primarily stems from sedentary lifestyles and from not what one is ingesting. It has been observed that of late, most have been engaging in indolent lifestyles, where they tend to be seated for most of the day, be it their work, traveling, or even when they are with their families experiencing free time. They tend to be physically inactive, and are unable to metabolize calories they consume, causing them to gain weight.   

Overall, I cannot concur with this proposal since it is not the intake that is causing a rise in the incidence of corpulence but the physically inactive ways of life, something that must be taken care of in order to let people lead a healthy life. 

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A  startling trend has surfaced where many, by virtue of being over engaged in their professional and social obligations, are neglecting their wards. This notion, however, is countered by many sections who outrightly reject the existence of any such phenomenon. 

Many commentators concur with the assertion that the youngsters are being neglected by their mothers and fathers. The latter are tied to their work due to the rising expectations of their employers and deteriorating economic conditions, which forces them to remain in their office  cubicles for extended hours, thereby leaving them with little time to focus on their wards. This can be illustrated by citing a study carried out world over to assess the condition of working parents that revealed disturbing details: most were unable to devote even  four hours in a week due to their professional engagement. 

Similarly, most are overwhelmed by the need to stay socially visible to help them expand their social and professional clout. This makes them attend parties, social gatherings and events, to name a few, depriving them of the time which they could have spent with their little ones, and eventually resulting in overlooking the needs of the latter. 

Nevertheless, the other school of thought quashes a former claim. They feel despite not being able to devote time to their chilren frequently, many make it a point to take their sons and daughters on outings, picnics and long vacations at regular intervals, enabling them to spend some quality time with their young ones.

Overall, I partially  subscribe to this idea since, even though most are compelled to fulfill their professional and social duties, they rarely abandon the need to look after their offspring, and use the exploits of their hard work for the merriment of their wards.

In some countries, people are allowed to keep arms, while some people feel that private citizens should not be allowed to keep arms and ammunition as it can threaten the society and pose serious problems for public safety. Discuss and give your opinion

In some countries, people are allowed to keep arms, while some people feel that private citizens should not be allowed to keep arms and ammunition as it can threaten the society and pose serious problems for public safety. Discuss and give your opinion

In contemporary times, various countries allow their people to use ammunition for their safety and the trend is increasing. The following paragraphs shall discuss the views of those in support of this notion along with, lobbies against this phenomenon.

To start with, a large number of people favor the policy of arms, as  permitting them can be helpful for the individuals who live in the countryside and outskirts, their surroundings are more difficult as these areas are usually infected with robbers and criminals. Furthermore, law enforcement is low in these areas and possession of arms is necessary in a locality surrounded by wildlife and forest, animal attacks are common and situations can become deteriorating for the people around. 

Similarly, individuals engaged in agriculture activities require weapons to safegaurd their crops from invading wild animals: the latter destroy the production. According to a study conducted by ‘Times Now’ it has been found that 80 percent of ruralites, mostly engaged in farming, felt weaponizing themselves gauranteed safety against the menace posed by of attacks of foraying wolves, deer and elephants.

Nevertheless, others pospose imposing laws against the usage of arms by the common population, for it can create  chaos and can make surroundings precarious for everyone, as one might use it as the first option instead of last. Additionally, keeping weapons at home can turn into fiasco: it is easy for childrens to reach out to such  equipment, leading to dire consequences and worsen the situation. Furthermore, the situation can become more difficult for police to take control of weaponry and tracking criminals.

Overall,  while the possession of arms is essential in some cities and remote locales infested wild creatures and criminals, the ease in the policy can make things difficult. Thus, such permission must be awarded discreetly.

In many societies, there is a growing emphasis on sustainable living and reducing environmental impact. What are the challenges of adopting a sustainable lifestyle? What practical actions can individuals take to contribute to sustainability?

In many societies, there is a growing emphasis on sustainable living and reducing environmental impact. What are the challenges of adopting a sustainable lifestyle? What practical actions can individuals take to contribute to sustainability?

Despite the increasing awareness about embracing sustainable lifestyles, many fail to do so, due to umpteen reasons. The forthcoming paragraphs shall delve into the causes of this, and offer plausible remedies to surmount these impediments.

To begin with, the major hurdle in attaining this objective is rising population, resulting in the need to establish more industries, and farms,to provide people with enough food, shelter and other essential commodities. Similarly, more population means greater demand and exploitation of available resources that is creating a stiff competition, by virtue of which lawmakers fail to implement any environment supporting rules or regulations. In addition to that, an unprecedented  wastage by the rising population barely leaves anything to sustain for the future generation.

In addition to that, people have completely become used to comfort and convenience, resulting in reckless milking of nature even when not required. To exemplify, many reports by W.H.O (World Health Organization) show that more than 80% of individuals in various parts of the world, especially affluent countries,  are prone to using cars even for distances less than a kilometer which ultimately causes 30% more pollution.

However, there are numerous ways to overcome these constraints: adopting more greener energy options and using resources prudently, especially water and electricity; and switching to recycling and avoiding fossil-fuel based vehicles can help a lot. Above all, preventing the use of plastics and wasteful practices like overshopping, dumping food, and overuse of personal vehicles can help mitigate the complications. 

To conclude, the rising population is a big challenge against sustainable living, but there are credible remedies that can be followed to support a much more eco-friendly lifestyle for societies across the globe.

Some people think the government should subsidize food and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Others argue that tax should be set on unhealthy food. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some people think the government should subsidize food and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Others argue that tax should be set on unhealthy food. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 

Whether the authorities should make farm produce affordable, or impose levies on junk food, is a matter of profound debate. The following paragraphs shall delve deeper into this matter and share a plausible stand. 

A prominent school of thought asserts additional cost in terms of tax, duty and excise, to name a few, should be implied on fast food such that people would limit its consumption. Growing numbers are consuming these without considering its nutrition values and detrimental impact on wellbeing. Thus, making these products expensive may encourage the populace to alter their eating habits and circumvent problems, like obesity, diabetes, and so on. Such a situation was witnessed in Jamaica last year, when the federal government imposed an additional sugar tax on soft drinks, leading to a drastic drop of 67% in the intake, and mitigating health issues, as well. Thus, the healthier food is, the lesser the incidence of disease. 

Nevertheless, others propound that healthier products such as vegetables, fruits, and many more are vital for bolstering immunity and can be promoted by allowing subsidies and allowances. Many would abandon the consumption of gluten loaded nutrition since fresh food would be available at a reasonable price. As per human behaviorists, although most find it overwhelming while coping with cooking fresh food and career obligations, they would still do it, for they will be saving some money. This persuasion will gradually evolve into a habit and many will be unwilling to switch to outside food, thereby rendering an enduring solution. 

Overall, although raising the price for unhealthy food would directly reduce its market share, it can be asserted that reducing the price for healthy food would be an appropriate solution since many would incline towards this and leading to a fit society. 

People today move to new cities or new countries more than ever before and experience many challenges. What strategies are there to meet these challenges?

 

People today move to new cities or new countries more than ever before and experience many challenges. What strategies are there to meet these challenges?

In concurrent times, moving to new geographical regions for a better life has emerged as a common trend. Such practice might seem exciting, but is laden with numerous challenges posed by various aspects such as climate, loneliness and so on. In this essay, I shall discuss strategies that migrants can adopt for smoother transition.

To start with, various schools of thought believe that before moving to a new destination one should gather knowledge about the culture of the place they are relocating to and learn about linguistic skills so that they can communicate effectively to survive efficiently in an alien environment. For example, if an individual is moving to Germany, they should acquire proficiency in German language. This will help in overcoming impediments posed by language deficiency.  They should also gather information about weather and climate so that they can carry appropriate clothes and necessary equipment required for survival. Additionally, one should know about prevalent infections in host societies so that effective preventive measures can be obtained.

On top of that, taking care of oneself is another biggest challenge. Thus, before shifting to a new place, one must learn basic life skills such as laundry, washing utensils, maintaining living spaces and most importantly cooking.  Moreover, tackling loneliness is another major issue. To circumvent feeling of homesickness one can undertake various activities and also join some online groups related to their occupation or hobbies, or participate in community activities so that they can establish friendships with people having similar interests.

 

To recapitulate, migrating to a new place can pose umpteen challenges, but one can embrace adequate methods to mitigate the risk of the unforeseen circumstances and settle in the destination location effortlessly.

Nowadays many people are trying to earn more and more to get rich. What are the advantages and disadvantages of being rich?

 Nowadays many people are trying to earn more and more to get rich. What are the advantages and disadvantages of being rich?  

Chasing affluence has become a ubiquitous attitude in concurrent times. However, where money becomes a reason for sorting many problems, it also lands one in a difficult situation. The following paragraphs shall delve deeper into this matter. 

Being wealthy makes one feel content and carry a greater sense of self pride to lead a better life since it is the outcome of their hard work which makes them recognized in the society. Additionally, deeper pockets can afford a lavish lifestyle by procuring swanky cars, luxury mansions, going on exotic vacations and many more, which remains a dream of the impoverished. On top of that, these groups of people can secure better today and tomorrow for their offspring by investing in quality education which would lead to a brightful future later.  Similarly, the rich can lead a peaceful life without worrying about disparities such as medical emergencies and basic necessities.

However, this tendency has certain pitfalls since prosperity brings along a lot of stress and problems. People who seek riches work around the clock to achieve their objectives leaving them with little time and interest to interact with their loved ones, affecting their relationships adversely. Also, these people are always in the limelight because of their elite living which makes others jealous and thus one becomes susceptible to robberies, kidnaping and many more.  Moreover, as per many human behaviorists, these people become greedy while chasing affluence and witness arrogance in nature while interacting with their peers; consequently losing their respect in society.  

To conclude, even though fortune yields a desirable outcome, one must be prepared to taste the sour fruit too which lies embedded deep in the box. Thus, it is extremely essential to practice judiciousness suggested in annals, to enjoy riches and surmount shortcomings efficiently.

Due to so many young people dropping out of school, rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can the situation be improved?

 Due to so many young people dropping out of school, rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can the situation be improved?

Dropping out of schools is provoking a hike in joblessness. The following paragraphs will highlight different measures that can be taken to prevent school dropout, thereby surmounting the challenge.

Research in modern education has shown that one of the most pertinent reasons for school drop is absence of the native language in formal educational settings. Thus, the mother tongue needs be to incorporated as a bridge language; it will help students adapt to using official medium of instruction. The language acts as a scaffold, easing learners into formal academics, and becomes a reason for the deepening the interest in schooling and young minds are persuaded to continue their school education.  

Similarly, the home environment may be one factor that hinders going to school. The government, social services, and the school should work together to ensure that basic hygiene factors, like enough food, cleanliness, established routine, space and time to study, are met at home, so that the child is encouraged to go to school.  Formal tuition must intervene and provide support to families to meet these basic necessities.

Furthermore, not everyone is academically inclined. Therefore, vocational training should be offered to ensure that the youngsters are adequately trained as per their inclination. Offering apprenticeships as part of the formal curriculum will train the next generation as craftsmen which the workforce requires. Instead of forcing traditional schooling on disinterested ones; offering classes on skills such as woodwork, and so on, would be more fruitful in creating a skilled labour force; hence, tackling rising unemployment.

Overall, to stem the problem of abandoning schooling, educational system  must be overhauled and changes must be made in language of instruction, syllabus and families must be assisted in improving their environment to ensure that their young members stay  interested in studies.