Some experts say for road safety cyclists should pass a test before being allowed on public roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, a common perception has been emerging that those pedaling must prove their eligibility before using common motorways. Even though this proposal seems to be agreeable, it is necessary to analyze the rationale behind it critically.
There is a skeptical view that challenges this notion and terms it as regressive. Such a move will only cause chaos as it will become hard to decide at what age one must undergo the licensing process: currently, everyone, regardless of their age, is allowed to pedal anywhere. However, after implementation of this policy, minors might be barred from using main roads and forced to remain confined to the residential areas only. Consequently, besides becoming dependent on others for negotiating their daily chores, they could also get encouraged to lead a sedentary lifestyle, by virtue of being condemned to travel by automobiles on main roads.
Nevertheless, those supporting this suggestion cite safety of road users as a motivation for making the testing of cyclists before affording them the liberty to use public roadways. It has been observed that there has been a phenomenal increase in road mishaps involving these individuals; a majority of such incidents can be attributed to their erratic behavior, stemming from their lack of knowledge of road rules and etiquette. This can be corroborated by referring to the data of accidents caused by cyclists in cities like Chandigarh where unpredictable maneuvers by these individuals led to road fatalities, especially of those riding two-wheelers. Thus, those cycling must prove their awareness of road safety norms before entering the main motorways.
Overall, controversies apart, I vehemently feel that such an arrangement should be put into effect urgently; this would help in making roads safe for all and prevent bicycle riders from becoming a cause of accidents.
