The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent times, there has been an idea that uniform governments could find social and economic benefits in collaborating with each other and removing the natural borders. This vision has forced many global leaders to ponder on the merits, demerits and efforts involved in joining forces together. This topic requires a deeper analysis.
A group of centralized policy makers can bring about significant positive changes to the way the world operates. In recent times, miscreants have found loopholes to escape the law and find refuge in countries without an extradition policy, which would be automatically eliminated with the arrival of a central order of command.
Moreover, many are in favor of a borderless world: a recent survey by the travel week magazine, showcased that the number one priority for people was for unity among policy makers to make it convenient to explore different continents. This would also lead to ease of trade between organizations and government bodies alike who do not have to go through additional red tape created by law makers today.
However, the critics feel that a unified world leadership may not provide adequate importance to certain minority communities and their respective needs will not be catered to in the long run and probably would lead to their existence being diminished. There is a fear among sections of various societies that it could lead to a few power-hungry leaders having excessive control over the world which could be detrimental to society in the future.
Overall, a united front for policy makers is a unique concept and the pros of this arrangement eclipse its cons. However, it is essential to critically analyse both the aspects, before embarking on the idea of uniting the world, by targeting greater good it would do for humanity at large.
