Due to so many young people dropping out from school, rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?

Due to so many young people dropping out from school, rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?

School dropout rates have been rising despite enactment of several  rules to curtail such practice, resulting in joblessness and other more intense challenges for the society. This pressing issue needs to be addressed urgently by deploying radical methods.  

A direct intervention that can turn the situation around, is creating alternative educational streams, so that the young individuals quitting schooling, due to being unable to pursue the domains that match their aptitudes, can enroll in courses which address their aspirations and expectations. This would help them advance their expertise in their desired area, complete education, and obtain employable skills. 

 Additionally, authorities must deal with lapses in the current educational framework sternly. Efforts should be made to bring back the dropouts within the folds of education by enacting a system of entrance examinations, to facilitate entry into the higher educational institutions, which gauge the abilities of learners rather than drawing lines based on past academic accomplishments. This will help renew the interest of the young individuals in continuing with their education.

Similarly, a visionary approach might help in stemming this ever worsening trend: making education more adaptive and interactive instead of continuing with the obsolete arrangement of imparting lessons, using books and worksheets, which generally cause a great disenchantment among young minds. A generation completely immersed and influenced by technology in their other walks of life is least inclined pursue academic dreams with century old methods: they are rarely able to  make connection between booking knowledge and practical applications of interactive technology that fascinates them with more complex challenges.   

Hence, I feel the current educational framework needs to be revamped and be made  more adaptive to address the challenges facing the society today or which may surface later. It is impossible to walk forward while looking backwards

More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? what can be done to solve this problem?

More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? what can be done to solve this problem?

Day by day the population of exotic species is declining as some of them are on the verge of getting extinct, while many have already been termed as endangered. The reasons behind promoting such a situation are multidimensional. But, solutions do exist to surmount this problem.

Human intervention in biodiversity is growing rapidly at a global level to fulfill various needs and demands of society. Such an intrusion of humans is causing deforestation and exploitation of natural flora and fauna. It is because of this, the surroundings of the forest are getting hampered: creating an unfavorable environment for some wild species, making sustenance for long enough harder; thus, leading to their extinction. Such drastic change causes disturbance in the food web that further exacerbates the problem for other species to continue their survival in absence of availability of food. Therefore, causing exotic flora and fauna to struggle hard for survival while their count keeps reducing.

However, to overcome this challenge, authorities must prohibit human activities of any kind in and around the pristine locations, so that any form of threat to wild species can be eliminated. In addition, several conservation programs and sites such as sanctuaries and botanical gardens must be established that can be used not only for the breeding of engendered species but also treating them. Such arrangements will aid in reviving the number of endangered species and may be able to restore the lost heritage of wild kingdom by performing research and simulating the environment required by those species

Hence, I am of the belief that conservation of wild animals is the need of the hour and if action is not taken now then it will be too late to take a call for their survival.

Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment, while others think that the government should do something to help. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment, while others think that the government should do something to help. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

With calls for taking steps to protect the environment becoming shriller, many have started discussing how to go about it. This has helped surface two disparate opinions, one that lays the onus on individuals to take the initiative and transform themselves, the other that suggests intervention from the state.

Individual citizens are the ones who create all the environmental damage with their unpalatable ways of life. They are the ones who are buying more and more cars, and driving frequently and in the process burning fossil fuels that is resulting in air pollution. If the citizens took a step forward and minimized their reliance on private conveyance and switched to public transport, it help nip the evil in its bud.

Moreover, undeniably individuals being the basic unit of the society, influence their  surroundings profoundly. Small steps taken by them, like resorting to minimal consumption, limiting the quantity they buy; recycling material instead of dumping them mindlessly; promoting greenery at their own initiative, like planting trees in the surroundings, can establish precedents for others to follow. This will improve things automatically and help reverse the damage to the environment.

Nevertheless, the state with its juggernaut of jurisdiction, authority and  access to abundant resources is perceived, by many, as a fit establishment to address the uphill challenge  of restoring ecological balance. They enjoy a wider reach, over the whole nation, and the populace generally follows their edicts without questions. Moreover, policy makers can also initiate various  programs carrying out research into finding eco-friendly methods and technologies to mitigate  damage to the planet.

Overall, I strongly feel although people should and can play an active role in the endeavor of keeping their surroundings life friendly, the state should also step in to support such undertakings to guarantee success

Some people prefer to help by making donations to local charities while some prefer to donate to national & international organizations. Discuss both measures and give your opinion

Some people prefer to help by making donations to local charities while some prefer to donate to national & international organizations. Discuss both measures and give your opinion

 

Today, altruism seems to be in vogue with many engaging themselves in activities to help the have-nots, but a question has intrigued many, whether is it good to offer resources to a local philanthropic organization, or to go for one that addresses a much wider audience, at national or transnational level.  

Many favor contributing to agencies working  locally, for they consider transparency to be of paramount importance. Whatever such organizations do is conspicuous, and the impact can be felt directly without seeking any external intervention of any written reports. The recipients of assistance can be seen drawing benefits by the donors, whereas this factor is missing if one puts their resources into an establishment that functions in  much larger areas. One cannot get to know about the fate of their money.

Similarly, others talk about optimum use of their contributed resources, and avoiding unnecessary expenditure by charities working for local causes. Such institutions enjoy direct approach to benefactors, and rarely need to publicize their work, or hire services of celebrities for promotion, unlike those bodies functioning in diverse geographies.

However, some vouch for funding humanitarian aid organizations that target much wider locations. They feel, in the current world order, one can hardly stay oblivious to plight of their fellow humans, residing in far flung areas who would otherwise be unreachable, and abandoned to  suffer, were these agencies not helping mitigate challenges by rendering relief. Thus, one needs to work with such entities  aiming at global causes to make the world a better place.

Overall, I infer engaging in humane activities, carried and executed in any form, should be the principal objective  rather than sparring over which medium is superior to other. Contributions made for local and broader causes have only one goal, helping the destitute.

 

 

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Will shifting the population from the country and outer-fringes of the cities to the urban locations help in easing up the predicament of high traffic density, and challenges faced in transportation. Many have hailed this proposal, others deride it and term it as impractical.  

Many advocate implementing this idea and feel it could bring a sea change in  the way people live in urban societies. This view is primarily based on the assumption that the majority of motorists and public modes of transit that ply / use the city roads hail from areas lying outside the municipal limits of the urban locations. Those  entering and leaving the cities must brave long travel and distance every day. If these people were made to dwell in the same urban locations, they would be spared of covering long distances every day. Also, many may feel encouraged to switch to public modes of transit like buses and metro trains if their homes and workplaces lie in close proximity to each other. This would surely help in thinning the traffic.   

 
Having said that, the ground realities of the urban settings and the traffic issues these areas face are far more complicated than this idea proposes, which is too simplistic. On delving deeper into the migration of urbanites to the outskirts and distant locations, one can easily arrive at the conclusion that the source of this outward movement has been the intense congestion caused by the dense in-city traffic, due to which the vehicles roll at a snail’s pace. So how could shifting people back into the cities help surmount this challenge. 

 Hence, this proposal lacks substance and will create chaos instead of fetching a long term mechanism to resolve the mess that plagues urban life, the unbearable yet in-escapable traffic snarls that urbanites encounter on a daily basis. 

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay Transport Migration  

Moving people back into the cities to rid of challenges posed by urban traffic and transportation, seems to be a radical solution and can go a long way in rendering an ease to the urbanites.  

Many advocate implementing this idea and feel it could bring a sea change in  the way people live in urban societies. This view is primarily based on the assumption that the majority of motorists and public modes of transit that ply on/ use the city roads hail from areas lying outside the municipal limits of the urban locations. Those  entering and leaving the cities must brave long travel and distance every day. If these people were made to dwell in the same urban locations where they work, they would be spared of covering long distances every day. The shorter drive would only use the shorter stretches and that also for brief moments rather than hours. Similarly, this would affect limited parts instead of the whole urban road network. 

Additionally,  since the brief commute and travel would also afford security to people, especially the women, youngsters and the elderly, many may feel encouraged to switch to public modes of transit like buses and metro trains if their homes and workplaces lie in close proximity to each other.Since these modes could also be used in the late evenings safely, further inspiring the commuters to use these. On top of that, many policy makers and town planners are quite optimistic that many fitness enthusiasts might also be inspired to abandon mechanized modes of transportation and switch to simpler means like bicycles. This would surely help in thinning the traffic.

Therefore, there is hardly any reservation to be expressed regarding the efficacy of this revolutionary concept, and I absolutely concur with the impact this will have on urban roads. Moreover, I feel this could also help stem urban sprawl, an indirect benefit

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.    

Ielts Essay Shortlisting students on the basis of academic records  

In order to make learning  more meaningful, many educationalists  have started proposing creating a bifurcation among the fast and slow learners in their formative years. This has initiated a  profound debate since many out rightly reject the former view.

Short listing learners as per their abilities to grab things can help save time and efforts of both, teachers and pupils. Tutors can stay focused on uniform strategies  that address the requirements of learners specifically. For instance, a setting that is populated with young learners who excel in academics, would need a method that facilitates rapid learning, while a class that has slow learners needs the sessions to be more explicit and slow to allow slow learners to grasp the content.  

Moreover, tutors will be spared of flak from students with the latter blaming them  for harboring partisan attitude towards bright or dull pupils. Admittedly, in  mixed ability classes, the progress often relies on collective outcomes, quite unwelcoming for those quick at grasping content. They complain of teachers deliberately slowing down the process to aid academically weaker. Same is true of the slow learners who often feel alienated with teachers involving brighter pupils in discussions.

Nevertheless,   critics of such settings assert that adopting this kind of practice will mean defeating the very purpose of education and promoting a permanent wedge between the learners quite early on which may become insurmountable later. The fundamental principle of formal tuition is promoting equality along with instilling wisdom and not training young minds to harbor ill-feelings for each other.

Hence, it can be said that harboring such discriminatory system will do more harm than good. In order to bolster excellence, basic tenets of education should not be abandoned, so I detest the arrangement of segregation and selective enrollment of pupils. 

Children playing team sports learn life skills. Do you agree or disagree.

Children playing team sports learn life skills. Do you agree or disagree.

Ielts Essay - Team Sport and Children 

Tutoring young minds about diverse spheres of life is an arduous task, but as per a few,  some burden can be eased by encouraging them to participate in team sports. There are, however, voices of disapproval over this issue.

Undeniably, participation in sporting disciplines that need whole team to play together can help drive in rich benefits for the growing minds: they learn an extremely critical lesson about social behavior when they interact with their team mates and learn to comprehend their personalities and words, and also reciprocating. Another very important personality trait fostered  through such activities is the spirit of team work and bearing the collective responsibility. Both these skills can prove to be pivotal in their success as adults, both in the professional and personal realms. 

Moreover, youngsters undertaking sports as team players  obtain crucial learning about emotionally supporting and inspiring each other; helping co-players bounce back from bad performances. This can prove to be invaluable for young individuals since as they grow up,  they inculcate empathy towards others, rather than remaining apathetic and self centered. On top of that, it is the team sports that carves out successful leaders and also those who follow orders.

However, there are those who out rightly reject the notion of team sports coaching children about practical life skills. Sporting activity in any manifestation, is a noisy way of exerting oneself and burning calories, and nothing more than that. This lobby proposes that young minds despite being inquisitive rarely absorb any knowledge unless it is transferred to them in the form of instructions.

In hindsight, controversies apart, team sports is considered to be laden with several benefits for the juveniles: they can grab essential skills that can help them grow as successful individuals empathetic to the society.

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ~Sanchit

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ~Sanchit

Cigarette is a carcinogenic substance which has devastating impact on the health of its consumers, but has an even greater effect on the bodies of non-smokers who are subjected to passive smoking. This has prompted concerned health experts to propose prohibiting smoking in public areas, whereas there are a few who disagree with it.  

The rationale behind forbidding lighting cigarettes in the public domain is protecting others from getting sick due to the smoke emitted by smokers. The side stream or each puff is laden with carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide along with other hazardous compounds which affect passive smokers more than the ones smoking. This can inflict bystanders with several lethal diseases like heart ailments, asthma and in extreme cases various kinds of cancers.   

The damage to the health of those around smokers does not stop here. It has been proven that inhalation of smoke emitted by smokers, has serious consequences on the fetus of pregnant ladies, as the chemicals in it can hamper the development of unborn babies causing physical deformities or brain damage, making them disabled for life.  

However, avid smokers oppose the ban by arguing that such steps are an assault on their freedom and are against the rights promised to them by the law. Similarly, others go to the extent of terming such a move as biased, they feel when society is surrounded by fossil fuel propelled vehicles and factories that discharge far more hazardous pollutants into the environment profusely, why should the minority smokers be discriminated against.  

In hindsight, I opine that smoking in public is extremely inappropriate and unattractive, as such misdemeanour could cause discomfort to someone and lead to severe medical issues to people in the immediate vicinity. Thus, such acts should be banned in public.

Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use as daily basics produced by other counties have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? ~ Sanchit

Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use as daily basics produced by other counties have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 

Many conservatives and environmentalists believe that importing simple products which are utilized on an everyday basis from far off regions in order to cultivate better geopolitical ties can have negative impact on domestic economy of a nation and also contribute to the international environmental issues like global warming, while there are a few who disagree with it.

Most of the global trade is in contemporary times is dependent on conventional energy sources like diesel and other fuel oils for transportation of raw materials and finished commodities across long distances, which are a primary source of pollution globally and are responsible for inducing unsurmountable damage to the ecosystem.

Moreover, importing basic day to day consumables from other countries could have devastating impact on the local manufacturers and businesses as outside players can manipulate regional markets by mass dumping their goods which would make it difficult for native competitors to sustain their operations, forcing them to shut down leading to unemployment and affect the economic capabilities of a state by slowly draining its wealth.

Nevertheless, proponents of global economy hail it as a very positive step towards world peace, resolving conflicts worldwide and promote greater harmony among people belonging to different areas. In addition to this, it provides consumers with a wide range of consumables to choose from thus providing them better alternatives and improve their standard of living. Furthermore, this would create a competitive atmosphere for local ventures to become more innovative and produce much superior merchandise.    

To summarize, I opine that in the concurrent era of globalization global economy is a necessary evil which cannot be neglected as in current diplomatic scenarios it plays a vital role. However, this should be done in a controlled manner so that the damage caused by it is minimum. 

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion.

Ielts Essay - Cultural Exhibition

Exploiting culture commercially to lure alien travelers is derogatory and a recipe to disaster as per conservatives, for local ways of life. However, this view is not supported by the progressives who view this as the only the way to preserve native identity in the current world order.    

The purist view treats such attempts with indignation, and professes that traditions are the foundations on which societies evolve and prosper. Although they were practiced diligently in older times in their undiluted forms,  today they are being used as mere facades of the society for the tourists, by those masquerading as preservers, and are being largely modified to make them comprehensible for the aliens. This is diluting the beliefs and blurring the difference between authentic and contrived details, denting the beauty and completely altering the reason and rationale behind them.

Nevertheless, the latter view puts forth the argument that in an era when the onslaught of globalization coupled with proliferation of dominant cultures is becoming more prominent,  and especially when the young generation is overwhelmingly influenced by such changes, the only way for beliefs, endemic to a region, to survive and to be perpetuated is by remaining visible. This can only be done if more and more people across the world are brought face to face with the indigenous customs, and the money earned out of such endeavors can be used to improve the living standards of those engaged in presenting those values in front of leisure travelers. 

Overall, even though opinion of traditionalists may hold some water since they wish to preserve the local customs in their original glory, in the current era this might not hold substance: the constant push by global identity and dominant societies might obliterate those practices and settings that forbid exhibition.  

Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay Taxation

Taxation, in various manifestations, despite being historically practiced, and also being deemed essential, fails to dissuade critics from questioning the very relevance of this policy, who quote some interesting views to support their view.

Levies   form the basis of revenue generation of the state, since it does not have any other source of income, which in turn are used for ensuring smooth functioning of the government machinery, as well as delivering development. Establishment and development of infrastructure – ranging from transportation, communication, utility generation and supplying like that of electricity and water; subsidized health care and education; and housing, has an overwhelming reliance on the taxes. If these were not collected, where a nation would be, as the supporters suggest.

Similarly, the funds generated through tariffs and duties are used to support and afford the most critical service to the citizens: security and protection. Every nation must ensure that the natives are protected from  internal and external threats, and for this  maintaining robust law enforcement agencies and military forces is pivotal which of course is funded with the help of public money.

Nevertheless, those cynical perceive it as an act of robbing people of their hard earned money. They profess, when individuals struggle at their own expense – in  employment or business, and fend for themselves  without any external intervention – and  face various uncertainties, like loss of jobs or failure of commercial endeavors, why not  retain the money for own  pleasure and future.

To recap, controversies apart, taxes are a way to ensure a safe and productive social environment. Every citizen should be obligated to fulfill this responsibility since governments have been vested with these powers by the people only. Except for sporadic failures,  authorities use the funds sourced from such levies for public good.

Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and  commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

Ielts Essay - Pressure on Children

In contemporary times, juveniles are exposed to pressing demands posed by their studies, the society around them and the overwhelming influence of the media and all manifestations. The source of these challenges are visible but, the ways to resolve these issues are elusive. Thus, one needs to delve deeper.

The most prominent source of immense load on young minds is the need to perform at formal tuition. Constantly rising emphasis on testing has made life miserable for youngsters as they are caught between two extremes, learning and preparing for examinations, leaving them with little time for extracurricular activities. The crisis further deepens when parents also raise the bar of expectations from their wards, which many times also mirrors the social perspective. Since everyone wants their children to outperform those of their peers and social connections. 

Similarly, peer pressure and perspectives formed by engaging with electronic games television and the internet have a far reaching impact on tender minds who are required to adhere to the norms established by their mothers and fathers, and also address their own aspirations, foster by engaging with those of their age groups and various external sources of  information. Most are found facing a dilemma. 

However, the panacea for this predicament can only be found if schools and parents make joint efforts. Where the former should reduce the frequency of the examinations, the latter should stop comparing their offspring and start seeing them as distinct individuals. Furthermore, there is also a need to make expectations more realistic besides, monitoring how young ones interact with the outer world.

Overall, although the situation is bemusing as youngsters face numerous uncertainties, things can be improved and life of young ones made easier if parents and schools act prudently, and adopt sensitive approach towards young individuals

Many people today are worried about ‘cybercrime’ such as hacking and identity theft. What problems does ‘cybercrime’ cause, and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words.

Many people today are worried about ‘cybercrime’ such as hacking and identity theft. What problems does ‘cybercrime’ cause, and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take?

Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words.

Ielts Essay - Cyber Crime 

Gullible internet users, oblivious to hazards of failing to adopt appropriate safeguards, often prove to be easy prey for the prying eyes of those attempting to steal sensitive details. This, nevertheless, can have serious implications for the victims, making it imperative to protect oneself from impact of such subversive acts.

Being defrauded can result in a great loss to individuals, in terms of both financial and social reputation. Unauthorized money transfers from bank accounts, or purchases on credit cards can financially jeopardize people, making them pay for dubious transactions. Additionally, unscrupulous elements, masquerading as someone else by using pictures and profile details, can mislead others, making victims a subject of unwarranted public wrath, and in extreme cases, bringing them under the scrutiny of the law enforcement agencies.

Commercial establishments too are at greater risk from such criminal acts. These have a potential to not only dent their financial conditions, but also pose a hazard to their business if the cyber criminals break into their confidential and sensitive databases, and slip away with extremely critical business plans and blueprints, thereby putting them in dire straits.

But this challenge is surmountable nonetheless, provided one adopts appropriate safety measures, like regularly changing passwords, sparingly using public computers for important transactions, like banking or online shopping, or accessing emails or other accounts. Organizations need stronger security and control: restricting access to only authorized personnel, and shielding confidential data with customized protection systems that do not follow generic procedures, can go a long way in rendering appropriate defense against illegal access.

Hence, even though virtual criminals are an integral attachment of cyber age, and eliminating them is almost impossible, one can turn the tables on these antisocial elements by acting prudently and embracing suitable measures to prevent  

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. ~ Sanchit

Of late, many educators have started to engage in a heated debate regarding the criteria one must meet in order to get admitted into an academic institution, some believe that individuals should be accepted on the basis of their educational merits, while there are a few who believe that it would be much more wiser to have a mix of students with varying potential studying together.  

 

A great deal of schools take pride in nurturing exceptional scholastic talent, it is their belief that good grades are a necessity for an educational establishment to become renowned and sustain their excellence/finesse in educating the society.  Moreover, this traditional view strongly disapproves of granting admission to those who are not good at studies as teaching and putting efforts on them would be a waste of time and energy. Similarly, allowing dull pupils to study with those with higher intellect will only slow down the imparting process, and cause distractions.

 

However, there is a lobby which believes that teaching pupils with different abilities together is a much more prudent and practical approach to bring out their innate aptitude lying dormant inside of them and to develop their unique personalities. As different ideas and moral values would clash they would create an atmosphere for innovation and help students to improve their social skills by making them more open minded and tolerant towards each other. In addition to this, it would instil a positive competitive spirit among peers to do better which would surely help the academically weaker improve themselves.  

 

In hindsight, I opine that teaching learners who have different capabilities together would help them to appreciate and develop their distinct characters. Thus, it would be a better idea to teach people with different abilities to be taught together.

 

 

 

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay Wild Animals 

In recent years, a ridiculous theory is being promulgated about letting wild fauna become extinct to conserve resources. This has drawn a lot of flak from various quarters who question the very relevance and rationale of this proposal. 

Critics of this proposal assert the real objective behind wildlife conservation initiatives is protecting wild habitats, the forests that . These green buffers besides acting as lungs of the planet that recycle the air and also inviting precipitation, act as a vital link with the past. These pristine locations can provide important information on how life evolved, as well as the solutions for the problems humanity is currently facing, and also those may surface in future. 

Moreover,  undeniably, life on the earth depends on diverse components, and wild animals form a critical part of that arrangement: their disappearance would result in great ecological imbalance, delivering catastrophic impact on humans several many ways. As experts suggest, wild fauna helps contain many pests and diseases since all of them are a part of an elaborate food chain. Even if a single element of this table vanishes, the whole system will collapse.

Nevertheless, although, beyond any rationale, many argue that how can public money be squandered on such ambitious projects when the house needs to be put in order. With billions languishing in poverty, struggling to make their both ends meet and access even basic amenities, these programs are a novelty, a passion for the elite who have little respect for those impoverished. 

In hindsight, I strongly feel that under no circumstances should the wildlife be allowed to vanish, it will cause irreversible damage and threaten the very existence of mankind. It is the need of the hour for humans to step forward and act responsibly, and protect their co-inhabitants.     

Many organisations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform?

Ielts Essay Uniform

Organization specific dress codes have become ubiquitous and almost all businesses, regardless of size, comply with the trend. This has led to an intriguing but a fierce debate about the benefits and downsides of this practice besides. One does wonder, however, about what work should follow a dress code.   

Undeniably, standardized clothing patterns facilitate blurring differences and promoting harmony among personnel, hailing for diverse socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. This makes colleagues abandon discrimination and  embrace homogeneity and instead pursue common objectives.  Also, corporate clothing is considered to be a highly acceptable method of rendering a distinction between levels of authority of those working at various levels of organizational  hierarchy, and role sets of those handling diverse jobs such as blue collar and white collar jobs.

Nevertheless, not many are convinced with the currently in vogue trend of sporting organization specified gear; they consider is disparaging. Their view is founded on beliefs that this acts as a mechanism that impedes, rather obliterating, creativity, and  promotes mental slavery and extreme reliance on following procedures, making people uneasy. Such an organization, as this lobby assumes, seldom sees productivity augmenting at every level, and is caught in procedural delays.

Despite the squabble about merits and demerits, the use of company defined attire code is a must in organizations that have specific role-sets such as armed forces, law enforcement agencies which help afford reassurance to citizens, and those which rely on public relations and outreach since the outfits of their personnel exude approachability and friendly attitudes.

In hindsight, wearing or foregoing a predefined ensemble has been eternally argued for ages though practice continues to thrive unabated, even in the modern emancipated world, in a new manifestation though. I feel it exudes unity, homogeneity and sense of obligation; thus, outshining alleged pitfalls.  

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions.

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates.

What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions.

Ielts Essay Global Warming 

Rapidly rising global temperatures are a growing menace and a major challenge for mankind in the contemporary times, for these have a potential to jeopardize human life. It is hence, a task of paramount importance to find a plausible mechanism to surmount this pressing problem.

The most prominent of the threats resulting from this phenomenon is an unprecedented increment in the levels of seawater due to rapidly melting glaciers and ice at poles. This has endangered the very existence of the coastal areas and cities like Mumbai, Sydney, Los Angeles and Singapore to name a few, which may be submerged under seawater in next few decades if the warming of the environment of the planet is not arrested right away.

Moreover, the impact of this occurrence would not stop here, as  more and more disastrous effects have become visible in the form of rapid climatic shifts and extreme weather patterns. More recently, extremely long summers with scorching heat in the tropical regions, and extended winters with temperatures dipping far below the freezing point are a new normal today. Similarly, droughts and inland flooding have become more frequent which were formerly unheard of.

The remedy for this perilous weather condition, nevertheless, lies with no one else but mankind, the primary force behind this catastrophic change. It is the need of the hour to immediately halt deforestation so that excessive release of carbon dioxide in the environment can be curtailed. Similarly, reducing dependence on fossil fuels for energy requirements would go a long way in cutting down emission of greenhouse gases.

Hence, undoubtedly global warming is casting an evil shadow on the very existence of humanity and the future of this planet. It is therefore extremely important to take remedial actions as soon as possible.

Nowadays online shopping is extremely popular. Discuss the impact of it on the environment and on people, who lost their jobs because of it.

Nowadays online shopping is extremely popular. Discuss the impact of it on the environment and on people, who lost their jobs because of it.

Ielts Essay E-Shopping

With more and more opting to shop online, shoppers are experiencing an unprecedented convenience both in terms of time and money. However, this not so old in vogue trend is impacting environment and people. In what ways does it influence both is a matter worth profound introspection.

Undeniably, ecommerce has been hailed as a boon for the environment since that latter is poised to reap rich benefits in long run if this trend gathers momentum. With a majority opting to shop online, they can now forsake the need to visit showrooms and  stores. This surely is bound to bring in colossal savings in terms of carbon emissions resulting from an ever-thinning traffic of shoppers and scaled-down operations of shops and ancillary activities.  

Moreover, the advent of this trend has a potential to stem the speed of deforestation. The dwindling number of  walk-ins of customers, making a beeline for shops, has resulted in a dramatic reduction in the requirement of new shopping malls and areas. Consequently, the town planners no more  need to develop new shopping infrastructure by denuding the planet, to cater to avid shoppers.

Nevertheless, online shopping has left several jobless, especially the skilled retail professionals needed to manage the showrooms, and intermediaries. E-portals forego the need to employ specialists in many trades, ranging from the ones designing showrooms, and professionals involved in arranging merchandise on floors to sales and marketing personnel to affect the sales. This has deprived them of their earnings; thus, exposing them to financial crisis and miseries.

In hindsight, controversies apart, ecommerce web portals are  there to stay, and in fact it is surely a good step that would afford a respite environment even though partial. The affected people would surely find a way to adapt themselves to this change. 

 It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

 

Ielts Essay - MOney saving 

In times when most  of the economies of the world are facing turmoil( unrest), many have resorted to spending frugally since they term it a crucial exercise for a safe future. However, some find it quite inappropriate to exercise restraint when it comes to using their financial resources. 

Not being spendthrift and investing in savings of various kinds is considered to be a prudent practice. This view is based on the fact that the future is always uncertain, and one can be exposed to emergencies and crisis, especially related to health at any point of time, in which case it may invite huge medical expenses. To negotiate such occurrences, one needs to have enough financial resources at ready disposal. Such relief is only possible if an individual uses his foresight and puts some of the income into creating a financial buffer.

Moreover, practicing thrift instead of liberal attitude when it comes to using money, also helps people to cushion their later life. It is a common perception that twilight years is a time when most have to lead a solitary life, or be without a job. At such times, every penny saved can prove to be a boon and afford all necessities.

Nevertheless, there are some who  feel that money is meant for consumption, experiencing the exploits of the hard work put in to earn it  rather than putting it aside for tomorrow. They feel that money is fast losing its value due to inflationary tendencies, and it may not fulfil the desires later, so one must utilize it to fetch pleasures today.

In hindsight, I opine sacrificing extravagance and putting money aside for the rainy days and bright future carries substance. Those who believe in being prodigal are short sighted and their prophecies should be overlooked.