Wild animals have
no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild
animals from dying out is a waste of resource. In what extent do you agree or
disagree?
In recent years, a ridiculous theory is being
promulgated about letting wild fauna become extinct to conserve resources. This
has drawn a lot of flak from various quarters who question the very relevance
and rationale of this proposal.
Critics of this proposal assert the real
objective behind wildlife conservation initiatives is protecting wild habitats,
the forests that . These green buffers besides acting as lungs of the planet
that recycle the air and also inviting precipitation, act as a vital link with
the past. These pristine locations can provide important information on how
life evolved, as well as the solutions for the problems humanity is currently
facing, and also those may surface in future.
Moreover, undeniably, life on the earth
depends on diverse components, and wild animals form a critical part of that
arrangement: their disappearance would result in great ecological imbalance,
delivering catastrophic impact on humans several many ways. As experts suggest,
wild fauna helps contain many pests and diseases since all of them are a part
of an elaborate food chain. Even if a single element of this table vanishes,
the whole system will collapse.
Nevertheless, although, beyond any
rationale, many argue that how can public money be squandered on such ambitious
projects when the house needs to be put in order. With billions languishing in
poverty, struggling to make their both ends meet and access even basic
amenities, these programs are a novelty, a passion for the elite who have
little respect for those impoverished.
In hindsight, I strongly feel that under no
circumstances should the wildlife be allowed to vanish, it will cause
irreversible damage and threaten the very existence of mankind. It is the need
of the hour for humans to step forward and act responsibly, and protect their
co-inhabitants.