SEARCH YOUR ESSAY

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Air travel is cheap these days, allowing ordinary people to travel further. Some people say that airfare should be increased because this leads to environmental problems and reduce air pollution. In what extent do you agree or disagree.

Air travel is cheap these days, allowing ordinary people to travel further. Some people say that airfare should be increased because this leads to environmental problems and reduce air pollution. Do you think that raising airfares would help reduce air pollution? In what extent do you agree or disagree. 




Technological development has made travelling by air affordable, encouraging the use of this medium. However, frequent flying means burning more and more fossil fuel, and generating more pollution, raising an alarm among environmentalists, persuading them to suggest raising the air-tariff to curtail this situation, while some hold a contrary  view.


Some experts feel that raising the air travel fare could help reduce pollution, as increased air ticket fare would make travelling by air unaffordable for the masses, because the expenditure incurred on air tickets would be beyond the reach of many. Reduced crowds would  force the airlines to scale down operations significantly, which would in-turn, lead to significant drop in the rate of release of pollutants into the environment.


However, some feel that this move would prove ineffective, because  most use this medium to travel to distant destinations that cannot be reached comfortably and safely. Raising air travel tariff would, although affect the travelers financially, they would not abandon travelling by air. Besides this, this mode has become a habit for many. To corroborate, in countries like the USA, a majority prefers flying rather than boarding a train or a Greyhound bus; they have got used to this routine.

Similarly, low air fares - in a way, has empowered everyone, regardless of  their socioeconomic backgrounds, engendering equality - have enabled even those who could not imagine flying in the past over long distances to fulfill their needs: meet their loved one, undertake leisure travel, gain education, treatment, or access employment opportunities, among others.  


In conclusion, I feel that raising air fares cannot help mitigate environmental challenges, but these allow even common people to meet their needs. The need of the hour is to develop such technologies which help in reducing the release of pollutants into air.

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Should retirement be compulsory at 65 years of age? - IELTS Essay

Should retirement be compulsory at 65 years of age? - IELTS Essay 

Ielts Essay - Reture at 65?


Off late, many social thinkers and scientists have started questioning validity of retirement age. Some sections strongly feel that retiring people at the age of 65 is fully justified, but some of the experts hold a strong viewpoint that challenges the very existence of retirement age.

The people, who vouch for upholding of retiring age at 65 years, suggest that, as human body and mind age up, they degenerate rapidly. The degeneration process reduces the capacity of the body as well as the brain to sustain energy levels required to keep a person active and energetic. The reduced energy levels pose serious hurdles in the way of efficient working. This factor can hamper the productivity of a person adversely. Retiring people at this stage is thus fully justified, and substituting them with younger and more active people is a way to sustain higher productivity.

Besides human body reaching performance limitations, retiring older people at the age of 65, is considered a good step, as this can create space for younger generation. Many social experts feel that, if the aged workers are not relieved of their duties then younger generation would not be able to gain employment, and garner valuable expertise. Moreover, after passing through a strenuous work routine, older people also deserve a chance to relax.

On other hand,   many experts feel that, retiring old workers is not a justifiable step. Relieving people of their obligations at a stage, when they have achieved perfection, is quite unwarranted. The senior personnel constantly struggle and sacrifice for companies and organizations, and when they arrive at a commanding stage, the organization must not abandon them.


In the end, I feel that although, retirement is a necessary exercise, seniors should be allowed to continue, if they feel so.  

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Some companies are closing their offices one day per week to save energy (gas, electricity). What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? - IELTS ESSAY

Some companies are closing theiroffices one day per week to save energy (gas, electricity). What are theadvantages and disadvantages of this?


Nowadays, saving on energy, and financial outlay of expenses connected with the consumption of power is on the top priority for many organizations. This has given rise to a strange trend among the organizations, as they have resorted to keeping a day-off at their office premises. The trend has attracted a debate among many experts, who discuss several benefits and drawbacks  of this new development. IELTS TEST ESSAY 

Some of the benefits of offering holiday at the work to make some savings on energy include reducing the per capita consumption of utilities, like electricity and gas. As per some experts,  the reduction in the per person consumption of the electricity and the gas helps the companies and the organizations in reducing financial expenditure, which in turn leads to optimization of operations. As per them, saving on energy bills means saving money.   IELTS TEST ESSAY 

Besides saving money, reducing the consumption by keeping a weekly-off at offices help in minimizing the consumption of the natural resources, because facilities generating electricity and gas utilize a huge amount of naturally occurring materials like oil and coal, etc.. Many companies are taking similar steps to help in conserving natural resources. Such steps form a part of the green initiative. IELTS TEST ESSAY 

On the contrary, some people feel, closing down offices for a day in a week has more drawbacks than the benefits. The savings made on the power consumption by keeping an off-day are easily offset by a comparative increase in power consumption on the other days, because the companies are forced to extend the working hours to compensate for the man hours lost  in keeping a day-off at the premises. IELTS TEST ESSAY 

In conclusion, I feel that keeping a weekday off at the offices always advantageous, and it greatly helps in bringing down the financial outlay on the power bills. IELTS TEST ESSAY 

Saturday, January 18, 2014

In many cases the development of a country is accompanied by pollution and environmental damage. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In many cases development of a country is accompanied by pollution and environmental damage. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?  
In many cases development of a country is accompanied by pollution and environmental damage
Ielts Essay - Development of a country is accompanied by pollution 


Today, all nations of the planet are striving hard to develop their economies. This progress has raised many concerns among the environmental experts, as they feel that the race to register growth has resulted in a dramatic rise in contamination of the surroundings, including land, air, and water, etc.. This has had an adverse impact on the ecological balance of the planet. There are those, who feel that pollution has nothing to do with development.

Many environmentalists feel, the race to register progress has taken its toll on our mother earth, and it has resulted in large scale destruction of natural ecology. The greed of maximizing the growth has encouraged humans to establish more and more industries, and indiscriminately exploit natural resources. This, in-turn has created a trend of over consumption. Higher production and consumption pattern has hit the environment hardest, and the planet earth is choking due to pollutants.

On the contrary, some people feel, it is not progress which has polluted our natural surroundings, but instead, it is indifferent attitude  of the people towards a cleaner environment, which is generating pollution. The progress registered in the past few years, has helped in improving the technology. If this new technology is rigorously implemented, things could be far better, but people simply do not want to adapt to the latest technological innovations. Many experts think that, if the countries could create a change in their policies, and take more responsible decisions about deploying greener technologies, things can improve to a great extent.
 
In conclusion, I personally feel, that although, development has somewhat contributed to the  destruction of natural ecology, but it is the ignorance of people, which is making things worse, and to drive mankind out of this problem, we need to adopt a greener approach. 

Monday, January 6, 2014

To be successful in education, it is more important to be a good student than to have good teachers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Ielts Essay

To be successful in education, it is more important to be a good student than to have good teachers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Ielts Essay 

Ielts Essay - Good Students or Teachers 


With education proliferating to different corners of the globe, people have started discussing and comparing relevance of teachers in education systems. Some experts feel that to impart effective knowledge, it is very important to have effective teaching strategies and qualified teaching staff, but there are certain experts who feel that success in education can be only guaranteed for those pupils who are intelligent and are meticulous in their study routines.Ielts Essay

Teachers have always been an important element in educational system and almost every human realizes the relevance of their relevance. The people imparting the knowledge and knowhow possess all the skills to elaborate the intricacies of subjects not only to the young minds, but also to the grown-ups. It is a teacher, who interprets the deepest of meanings to the pupils seeking knowledge, and good instructors can make all the difference, because they have access to intelligence of each student, and deliver lessons appropriately, and as per requirements.

Besides teachers being the mediums of delivering the subject matter effectively, they also play a pivotal role in helping students devise effective strategies to learn and pick up skills. Most of the instructors are well versed and practiced individuals, and they have an in-depth knowledge of elements required to gain valuable knowhow in each domain. Effective delivery of subjects and well planned strategies guarantee successful education.

On contrary, there are some people who feel that attainment in academic pursuals is a tangible term only for the pupils, who are intelligent and have necessary skills to cope with the complexity of subjects they are pursuing. In their view, no teacher can deliver subject knowledge to those who are not receptive.

In conclusion, I feel that importance of teachers in the educational system can never be undermined.    

Thursday, January 2, 2014

Should retirement be compulsory at 65 years of age? - IELTS ESSAY

Should retirement be compulsory at 65 years of age?


Off late, many social thinkers and scientists have started questioning validity of retirement age. Some sections strongly feel that retiring people at the age of 65 is fully justified, but some of the experts hold a strong viewpoint that challenges the very existence of retirement age.

The people, who vouch for upholding of retiring age at 65 years, suggest that, as human body and mind age up, they degenerate rapidly. The degeneration process reduces the capacity of the body as well as the brain to sustain energy levels required to keep a person active and energetic. The reduced energy levels pose serious hurdles in the way of efficient working. This factor can hamper the productivity of a person adversely. Retiring people at this stage is thus fully justified, and substituting them with younger and more active people is a way to sustain higher productivity.

Besides human body reaching performance limitations, retiring older people at the age of 65 is considered a good step, as this can create space for younger generation. Many social experts feel that, if the aged workers are not relieved of their duties then younger generation would not be able to gain employment, and garner valuable expertise. Moreover, after passing through a strenuous work routine, older people also deserve a chance to relax.

On other hand,   many experts feel that, retiring old workers is not a justifiable step. Relieving people of their obligations at a stage, when they have achieved perfection, is quite unwarranted. The senior personnel constantly struggle and sacrifice for companies and organizations, and when they arrive at a commanding stage, the organization must not abandon them.


In the end, I feel that although, retirement is a necessary exercise, seniors should be allowed to continue, if they feel so.  

Ielts Training Introduction


Sunday, December 22, 2013

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss. II Ielts Essay

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss. 






Nowadays, news editors have started resorting to objectively selecting material to be presented, evoking a debate whether this phenomenon has contributed to a gloomy scenario, and should news about joyous events be given more emphasis.    

 Editors, while choosing news, generally consider certain aspects: professional aspirations and the monetary benefits, factors that come into play for the new agencies aspiring to create a niche for themselves by bolstering viewership and readership in the contemporary markets. Additionally, many are driven by favoritism and political affiliations, persuading them to become highly selective, and often biased.  

 The rapidly incrementing inclination of media houses towards reporting distressing news having capability of creating sensations, has led to engendering a bizarre phenomenon among the viewers and the readers, who have developed an insatiable appetite for knowing more and more about fateful events and happenings. Gaining knowledge about fateful happenings has become a staple requirement of keen news hunters. To surmount this, some advocate production and printing of news about pleasant happenings. An overdose of reports about disturbing incidents has resulted in creating unhappy sentiments. Thus, it is felt that reporting pleasant news would surely help reign back the dipping moods.

Having said that, those cynical of the former proposal suggest this is unlikely to help in alleviating hopelessness, and feel that the primary obligation of editors is to ensure reporting remains free of any lop-sided considerations, whether good or bad. Moreover, just prioritizing the amount of pleasant reporting would not wipe out disturbing incidents, but make people oblivious of hazards hovering around.

In hindsight, I feel commercial compulsions drive the decisions of including, or excluding items of reporting, and this has contributed to paranoid environment, yet news should be presented impartially and without taking their nature into account. 

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? Discuss.


 New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influencethese decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more goodnews was reported? Discuss.


New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers
Ielts Essay - News Editors and News 

With the information revolution proliferating, eminence of editors has gained prominence, as they are the ones, making decisions - several factors influence such moves - about, excluding and including reports. This propensity, as per many, fostered an craving for unpleasant news and it would appropriate to report pleasant events.

The underlying elements that decide the preference include ascertaining the relevance of happenings to be reported: the emphasis is always on short listing something that can be sensationalized, and attract more followers. The TRP ratings and readership are highly placed over other aspects; this can fetch rich yields in the form of monetary rewards and ensure enduring popularity.  
 
This proclivity has helped paranoia pervade through the length and breadth with the audience fostering an insatiable appetite for unpleasant news from all walks of life with the majority opening newspapers and switching TV sets for knowing about fateful happenings. To surmount this appalling, more reports about jovial events should be prioritized to help uplift dipping public sentiments.  
 
Having said that, the critics doubt the relevance of the former proposal and feel that this could do more harm than good by making people oblivious of the menace and perils that lingering around them, making them vulnerable to myriads of jeopardies such as robberies, epidemics, natural calamities, and so on.   It is felt by this school of thought that the enlightened readers and viewers are quite judicious in their approach and can differentiate between all kinds of reports.

In conclusion, I feel that, although majority of news being reported are distressing and some would like to get an input of pleasant happenings, news must be presented as it is and whether events in question are pleasant or distressing.


Sunday, December 8, 2013

Economic progress is one factor that is being considered to measure the success of a country, but there are other factors that should be considered when measuring the success of a country. Do you agree or disagree? What other factors do you think should be considered? Do you think one factor is more important than others? - IELTS Essay



Economic progress is one factor that is being considered to measure the success of a country, but there are otherfactors that should be considered when measuring the success of a country. Doyou agree or disagree? What other factors do you think should be considered? Doyou think one factor is more important than others?

Economic progress is one factor that is being considered to measure the success of a country
Ielts Essay - Economic Progress and Others Factors


In the modern era, when each of the countries is trying to gain prominence on the global level through economic progress, there is an opinion building up among some sections, which feel that economic progress is not the true parameter of success. As per them, there are other more essential elements, which play a far more important role in the development of a nation.

Development of a country in financial perspective can never be taken as a true indicator of a country’s success and prosperity as economic performance has a very small role to play in overall progress. Some people feel that until and unless, the principles of social justice and factors like equal opportunities for all, are truly implemented in a society, whatever economic prosperity is garnered, will prove to be worthless and futile.

On contrary, some strongly advocate economic affluence as being a true element of accomplishment for a country. They feel that, social equality and justice can only be proliferated to distant and remote sections of society, when the governments have enough money to invest into the endeavors which encourage such noble activities that spread awareness among masses.

As per several social thinkers, other more vital elements which play a far more essential role in prosperity in a country include education, health and harmonious living. These people feel that the countries which can ensure equal opportunities for all the inhabitants irrespective of their religion, caste, creed and cultural backgrounds, can only be counted as truly affluent and successful.

To conclude, I personally feel that all the elements, which make a country and its natives prosperous and influential are entwined closely and cannot work independently of each other. It is therefore, not advisable to ignore any of these essential components.

Saturday, November 23, 2013

The Mass Media, Including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? - Ielts Essay


The mass media,including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

  


With communication proliferating and expanding to touch every nook and corner of globe, people have greatly become influenced by swings being propagated by disparate mediums of mass media, but some people feel this fails to have a sizable impact.  

Due to its ability to penetrate faster and deeper across the topography and geography of globe and its capacity to carry loads of information, media has become a formidable means of informing people about the happenings and latest developments. Media can create awareness among people faster than anything else for e.g. a meticulous information campaign initiated by televisions channels after the gruesome rape of a girl in New Delhi in 2012 resulted in series of huge protests and demonstrations and people took to streets to demand justice.  

Besides having faster and deeper penetration, media has capability of creating a cult and addiction among the viewers, listeners and readers etc. Various companies and agencies are using this medium to publicize their products and concepts. Moreover, they often go to extent of using popular public figures to promote their merchandise. Media has always played a pivotal role in creating factors that often compel people to follow what media propagates.

On contrary, there is sizeable section that feels the mediums of communication do inform people and society but they fall short of creating trends and swings because the opinions and viewpoints are premise of rational human beings and they always consult their own conscience before forming an idea.

In conclusion, I feel that media has, although appeared as prominent innovation, ideas and opinions are more effected by individual aspirations. Thus, this notion can be said to be partly true.  

Some people say private schools should be banned because they give students an unfair advantage on others. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples from your own experience.

Some people say private schools should be banned because they give students an unfair advantage on others. To what extent do you agree or di...