Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?
A school of thought believes that youngsters should set their objectives, while others are convinced that there is no need to strive for any attainment. The following paragraphs will discuss both the views and highlight my perspective.
To start with, to achieve something great in life it is necessary for youngsters to be ambitious, as it provides motivation to strive for and achieve those things. In addition, it provides purpose to life without which they will never know what to do in their life. To corroborate, one study found that those having aims, especially those working on top management ranks in giants like PWC, and so on, in their life were more satisfied since they felt they .
Moreover, while pursuing desires and cravings, one learns various new things and broadens their perspectives. Consequently, they are able to achieve financial stability and also social visibility. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo dearly harbored a dream of making it big in the sport of football, and he immersed himself into learning diverse skills and strategies that fetched him finesse as an expert and skillful player, fetching him not only triumph but also fame and fortune.
However, having no goals in life is also fine for some because some want to live in the moment and enjoy their lives. Moreover, it is felt that while chasing goals, one faces hardships, and stressful circumstances, causing various physical and mental ailments. In addition, they become too involved in their goals and they do not get time to spend with their loved ones.
To sum up, both views have their pros and cons. According to me one should have an objective in their life as it gives purpose to life and when one achieves it will give them satisfaction and bring financial stability.
