Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with examples from your experience.

 Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with examples from your experience.

The debate about whether people should face penalties for the unsocial conduct of their wards, is quite heated. I believe this approach is unfair and unrealistic. Although families are central in shaping the character of youngsters, they cannot be expected to exercise control over their conduct, for the latter must bear the consequences of their own actions.

 

As young people mature, their behaviour is influenced by numerous external forces, including friends, social media, and the school environment. Even at homes despite being rendered a strong guidance and support, young ones can still make harmful or illegal choices. For instance, if they choose to cheat, lie, or engage in scuffles, it reflects more on their own judgment than on their upbringing. Thus, it is not right to hold fathers and mothers liable for actions they did not directly cause.

 

Moreover,  putting legal pressure for such matters could prove to be counterproductive. Many already struggle with financial, or emotional, stress while trying to raise their young ones properly, and holding lawfully obligated for every mistake the latter commit can discourage, rather than supporting them, exacerbating complications, which could cause chaos for already distraught families.    

 

Having said that, some do support this move, despite this view lacking in substance, and profess such a policy will precipitate a quick impact, for the fear of reprimand, fines  and levies would motivate mothers and fathers to act, and educate their offspring about righteous ways, and embracing socially acceptable behavior.  

To conclude, although parents must be legally responsible for the well being of their little ones, they should not be blamed for every wrong decision their child makes. Young minds need to take the onus and understand the consequences of their actions, rather than depending on their parents to take the call.

Some old people today struggle with the use of modern technologies such as smartphones and computers? What are the causes of this? What are the solutions?

 Some old people today struggle with the use of modern technologies such as smartphones and computers? What are the causes of this? What are the solutions?

Causes 

• They are used to operating older systems that needed manual efforts,  and were not compact in size 

• Their failing health makes it hard for them  familiarize with the modern equipment 

• slowing reflexes 

• Weakening eyesight 

• Failing memory 

• Reluctance to accept change, for they fear that they might become a butt of jokes if they make a mistake   

• Young members of family not cooperating 

Panacea 

• Manufacturers should include voice commands, and bigger and more accessible buttons 

• Special manuals to help them learn about new devices 

• Family members helping them learn by showing them the benefits of such devices like making video calls to loved ones, showing them their favorite programs and playing them  the music they have a penchant for  

Undeniably, the elderly are unable to swiftly embrace the use of modern tools, and methods, and the following paragraphs intend to delve deeper into the causes driving this hesitation, besides recommending some plausible remedies.

To begin with, the  primary factor fueling this reluctance is the wide gap between the functioning of the equipment senior citizens were exposed to in their heyday, and the one they are vulnerable to now. For instance,  machines of yesteryears, even those belonging to late 20th century, supported manual operations, which were slow, and had physical buttons, whereas their up-to-date counterparts are digital versions; compact in size; have virtual functional symbols; and respond spontaneously, making it hard for the aged to cope with the speed and the sophistication, and forcing them to stay away from engaging with these.  

To add to the woes, their failing health, slowing reflexes, and aging eyes, present a steep challenge in them becoming friendly with these gadgets. A majority is disinclined to use the new introductions, for they fear that handling these might result in malfunctions, and damage, fetching them ridicule of their family members, making them resistant to the idea of operating these.

Fostering a penchant among old individuals can be a seamless task if families decide to intervene. The progeny and the grandchildren  should demonstrate the practical use of these instruments, and persuade them to interact with these actively. Additionally, the devices being manufactured should have optional facilities like voice command to promote ease of use for all, especially for those in their autumn years. 

In hindsight, incompatible technologies, and the age, stigmatize indulgence with concurrent equipment and methods; nonetheless, younger family members,and manufacturers can help teach the aging population that one can become tech savvy at any stage of life. 

Some women choose to have children later in life. What do you think are the reasons for this? Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

 Some women choose to have children later in life. What do you think are the reasons for this? Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Several women, in contemporary times, are seen pushing their age of becoming mothers further. This can be attributed to umpteen reasons. However, this phenomenon has favorable unfavorable ramifications that I shall delve into deeper into  the following paragraphs. 

To start with, numerous eminent behaviorists propound that education has played a significant role in changing the thinking pattern of females about opting bearing offspring. They prioritize accomplishment of professional pursuits in order to attain stability in life, by virtue of which, they feel more financially independent which enables them to become prudent decision makers in various realms of life. Furthermore, it has been observed that even after marriage, many take time to cherish motherhood as they want to explore their new phase and to develop better understanding with their spouses, which not only makes their bond stronger but also prepares them mentally to welcome their child. Therefore, this dynamism turns out to be a favorable phenomenon.

However, some skeptics assert that women opting for children in their advanced age are often found to be inflicted with several physical and mental health complications such as depression, diabetes, frequent abortion and many more, which reduces their chance of having a healthy child. Besides this, increased age gap among parents and wards tends to develop clashes between the two generations when the latter grows into an adult due to differences in their attitude; consequently, hampering harmony within families. Moreover, sometimes parents fail to take full responsibility for their wards due to physical constraints associated with their older age and thus, adversely affect the life of both of them.

Overall, even though motherhood at later age is associated with certain drawbacks, I feel that this propensity has offered several advantages to females in terms of better career and financial stability.

Many studies have shown that the most criminals have a low level of education. Some people say that to reduce the crime rate, criminals must be educated within prisons. It will improve their prospects of employment when they are released. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Many studies have shown that the most criminals have a low level of education. Some people say that to reduce the crime rate, criminals must be educated within prisons. It will improve their prospects of employment when they are released. To what extent do you agree or disagree?  

The great discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the issue of whether imparting education to perpetrators while they are in the prisons can help to reform their ways after serving their sentence and eventually mitigate  anti socal endeavors , or not. The following essay will delve deeper into both aspects and share a plausible opinion.

Some eminent psychologists propound that education can render umpteen number of ways in transforming the conduct  of criminals: provision of vocational and rehabilitation skills in correctional facilities can help such people to find a suitable employment after their release, which not only will offer  financial support to them and their families but also render a new chance to lead their life with respect and dignity. Furthermore, societies can also utilize the potential of these antisocial elements in a more productive manner by affording them an environment where unlawful people can work safely with their counterparts, and thus alleviate  unlawful activities in the long run.

However, a lobby of skeptics asserts that this arrangement will only waste humongous efforts of authorities and hard-earned money of taxpayers as businesses will not offer employment opportunities to such perpetrators, by virtue of their past and hence, eventually make it hard for the latter to get fairly compensated jobs. Moreover, it has been observed that criminals are more inclined towards unlawful activities rather than other professional endeavors in order to earn money by easy means. This propensity cannot be altered  by implementation of a few educational classes in prisons, thus having little impact on behavior of these people.

To conclude, barring a few downsides, I feel that education is the only means to readjust the perpetrators back in society by reforming their behavior. Hence, I completely  concur with the given notion completely.

Some people believe that advancements in technology in the 21st century have allowed people to have more free time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

 Some people believe that advancements in technology in the 21st century have allowed people to have more free time.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Saved time 

• Eased up the burden of repetitive jobs, and preventing errors, thereby saving immense time

• Helping organize work and studies better 

• Even at home people are spared of the need to constantly monitor the household chores 

• Telecommuting and online classes 

NO 

• Learning new skills has become a perennial process 

• Rising expectations from employers; adoption of technology has led to streamlining of work processes and reducing staff, pushing workers to embrace more responsibilities 

• Distractions caused by social media makes one waste their time

Undeniably, the advent of the state-of-the-art tools and methods has radicalized the way mankind engages with work: at home, job, education, and other domains, but has it helped spare extra time, is something that needs a serious analysis.  

Availability of up-to-date aids has allowed circumvent the need to negotiate repetitive tasks: mitigating errors and enhancing efficiency, sparing moments, otherwise wasted in negotiating those tasks. This phenomenon has been specifically observed in occupations, like  manufacturing, warehousing, customer service, and healthcare, to name a few, where one  is subjected to perform complex tasks, and become prone to spending long hours battling with the  work. Those engaged in these realms report saving at least two hours per day.    

On a similar note, home makers have been the biggest beneficiaries of the modern devices and  appliances that have rendered household chores virtually effortless besides speeding them up, making their life uncomplicated. Now,  while cooking, doing laundry, cleaning floors, mowing lawns,  and  so forth, one is relieved of the onerous responsibility of consistently performing and monitoring the process ceaselessly, and can instead focus on other things, and finish their work quickly. 

Nevertheless, there are some complaining of being busier than  the past, particularly those working in domains that allow work from home: information technology, financial and  data analysis, and teachers, wherein the personnel report that their employers have pruned  the labor force, making it leaner, thereby burdening employees with extra responsibilities: they are expected to handle more work than yesteryears. 

In hindsight, barring a few less fortunate who have become victims of modernization, a majority report being able to break the mundane and gain some spare time for themselves. I feel that with the passing time, those suffering currently will also see light at the  end of the tunnel.       

Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

A school of thought believes that youngsters should set their objectives, while others are convinced that there is no need to strive for any attainment. The following paragraphs will discuss both the views and highlight my perspective. 

To start with, to achieve something great in life it is necessary for youngsters to be ambitious, as it provides motivation to strive for and achieve those things. In addition, it provides purpose to life without which they will never know what to do in their life. To corroborate, one study found that those having aims, especially those working on top management ranks in giants like PWC, and so on, in their life were more satisfied since they felt they .  

Moreover, while pursuing desires and cravings, one learns various new things and broadens their perspectives. Consequently, they are able to achieve financial stability and also social visibility. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo dearly harbored a dream of making it big in the sport of football, and he immersed himself into learning diverse skills and strategies that fetched him finesse as an expert and skillful player, fetching him not only triumph but also fame and fortune. 

However, having no goals in life is also fine for some because some want to live in the moment and enjoy their lives. Moreover, it is felt that while chasing goals, one faces hardships, and stressful circumstances, causing various physical and mental ailments. In addition, they become too involved in their goals and they do not get time to spend with their loved ones. 

To sum up, both views have their pros and cons. According to me one should have an objective in their life as it gives purpose to life and when one achieves it will give them satisfaction and bring financial stability.

Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

 Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

Having a goal in life is essential for some youngsters, as per some, but some are averse to this notion. The following paragraphs will profoundly delve into both the view on this matter, and emanate a plausible conclusion.

Those leaning in favor of young minds committing themselves to attaining their desires feel that such perception provides them a purpose that can make them visible not only socially but also professionally,  benefiting them in their personal realm, and keeping them motivated to enhance their stature. Some, turning the obsession of harboring dreams, are able to accomplish  attaining pinnacle faster than even those who are more experienced in this domain .  To exemplify, a personnel striving to achieve a position in the management in big organizations, dedicate themselves in achieving success and upskill and gain versatile knowhow of intricacies of their occupation, fetching them rewarding opportunities to rise and shine. 

Nevertheless, those not in agreement with this notion believe ,defining aims can lead them astray from having healthy relations with their  family, causing detachment from the societal environment, making them seem self-centered, or arrogant. As per this section, those chasing an endless mirage of goals undergo a lot of stress as they are exposed to hardships and extreme pressure to prove themselves, and if they are unable to achieve something, they feel dejected and defeated. For instance when someone is chasing the mirage of fame, they might forget the true essence of life and even at times become delusional, hampering their  thought process or losing sight of their own individual perspective .

To conclude, a goal serves a greater purpose in life, providing one with the ability of critical decision making and enabling them to foster a prosperous future for themselves without jeopardizing their relations with loved ones. 

On top of that, such propensity affords dedication to stay focused towards objectives  of realizing aspirations in life. To see this through one seeks knowledge that helps them broaden their perspectives and develop skills, preparing them to face any hardship such endeavors bring, making them creative in  an unprecedented way.