Some people say that public libraries should be free, otherwise they are just a waste of money, especially because modern technologies and the internet allow easy access to resources. Discuss and give your point of view. - Ielts Essay

Some people say that public libraries should be free, otherwise they are just a waste of money, especially because modern technologies and the internet allow easy access to resources. Discuss and give your point of view.

Library or IT

The advent of information technology has brought about drastic changes in the way people store information. This phenomenon has penetrated all walks of life, and some people have started suggesting that there is no need to maintain expensive libraries, though some feel that libraries cannot be superseded.

The modern technology has made life quite easy, enabling shrinking loads of information into very compact data. Now, even the gigantic databases including books, chronicles and other important works concerning history, research into various fields, etc., can be saved anywhere quickly. Similarly,  the saved information can be retrieved and accessed from anywhere: even right from the comfort of the homes and offices. An unimpeded saving and accessing facility has made electronic mode of storing and retrieving information almost indispensible, so there is hardly anyh rationale behing maintaining these cumbersome resources and charging visitors.

Moreover, compact databases on standalone machines or servers connected to cloud services do not require sprawling premises. Besides this, the information just needs simple backups to ensure loss of data due to certain accidents. Many find this mode of accessing books and other important material quite inexpensive when compared to multitude of funds required to maintain books and library premises.

However, the importance of libraries cannot be ignored at all, as these though this conventional but excellent way of saving information is deemed critical when it comes to storing original work; manuscripts; centuries old documents and other important research papers, etc., as originality is sometimes deemed more vital than just saving information. Nevertheless, they need money to sustain their collection; maintain their premises; and pay for the staff and expansion of their facilities. It is worth noting that government grants are rarely are sparse; therefore, these institutions must charge.   

To conclude, I feel that libraries are part of heritage of any culture and replacing them is almost impossible, and they need to charge levy. Thus. they should be maintained and not offered for free.   

Some people feel that Schools do not teach children how to stay healthy anymore? To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Some people feel that Schools do not teach children how to stay healthy anymore? To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Education and health of children have always been top priority. Since the advent of 20^th century, appropriate focus has been laid on training children in academics and educating them about leading healthy lives. But as per some, the focus seems to be shifting as schools do not prioritize health education anymore, though there are some who feel otherwise.

The focus of educational institutions has gradually shifted to prioritizing academic excellence and finesse. To see this through, the faculties put whole hearted efforts into training students for better academic accomplishments. With the multitude of efforts being put into encouraging and preparing pupils for higher academic output, educational establishments are left with little time to teach young learners about leading healthy lives, for instance, several schools have shelved extracurricular activities from syllabus, and replaced them with academic discipline.

Moreover, although many schools still profess about ensuring comprehensive personality development of young learners, and such institutions heavily publicize various activities aimed at fostering healthy habits among children, much publicized talk about health education is merely a lip service, as the schools seem to be pursuing commercial goals, and they are least bothered about the overall development of the kids.

However, some people really feel that schools are still continuing with the mission of fostering healthy habits among the children, and even though the schools do not include any formal health programs in regular syllabus, the educational establishments regularly organize such workshops and activities that invite participation from established health practitioners and students. This in turn, inspires young learners to follow precedents of professionals, and learn about leading healthy lives.

To conclude, I personally feel schools seem to have lost the way in pursuit of better academic pursuits, and have ignored the need of teaching pupils about healthy lives.

Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

 

Ban Mobiles In Public Areas 

Mobile phones have revolutionized the world of personal communication but also invited a lot of flack as some people feel that these handy gadgets are proving to be more nuisance than being useful, and hence, people should be barred from using them in public especially  libraries and public transport, though there are some, who feel otherwise.

People using cellular phones tend to become insensitive towards others as they while talking to others on these small gadgets become oblivious of the surroundings, and are lost in their own world. Talking on phones takes them through a psychological transformation as they are not able to control their impulses and react immediately to discussions taking place on the phones, the reactions which often are loud and bland, and in process disturbing the people around. This disturbance easily upsets fellow commuters using public transport like buses and trains.

Moreover, these modern gadgets are equipped with numerous Apps and games, which tend to be addictive. The people using these facilities are always engrossed in playing games or chatting with other people with help of social networking Apps. This makes them ignorant of surrounding conditions, and they silently carry on behaving erratically and disturbing others in the process, especially ones sitting in peaceful environments like libraries.

Nevertheless, barring use of these gadgets in public would be unwise, as most people often make use of these gadgets to communicate urgent matters only. Moreover, while using these gadgets in public areas, people tend to be quite as most usually minding their own business and not disturbing others around.

To sum up, I personally feel that although some of the mobile users do behave erratically in public, this does not however imply that we should ban use of these gadgets in public areas.

Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this development? - Ielts Essay

 

Travel to Remote Environment 

With scientific research gaining more importance and travel transforming into wanderlust, scientists and travelers with itchy feet have started exploring virgin untamed habitats. Modern scientists and travelers know no boundaries, and they do not hesitate to even include poles of the planet in their research and travel itinerary. This trend has fetched accolades and some brickbats simultaneously.

Travel by scientific community to untamed areas and regions like poles is laden with numerous benefits as scientists get a chance to explore various mysteries connected to our planet and its environment, for instance, places like Antarctica are often regarded as mine of undiscovered facts that can reveal vital clues linked to changes in the weather patterns and their influence on our planet, and crust of continents that have drifted apart from each other long ago. The long frozen ice caps of these locations contain loads of information about the changes in quality of air over different periods.

Similarly, travelers foraging into the wild and untamed areas avail opportunities to learn about the how flora and fauna thrive in natural habitats, and also to know about why it is extremely essential to preserve these pockets of wild areas for the well being of our planet.

However, the concept of exploring Ecozones is believed to be a hazard for the natural habitats. The researchers exploring these territories often cause more damage to the surroundings in the name of carrying out nature study, as many seek opportunities to exploit virgin material of these areas for commercial purposes. Even the rovers who just enter these areas cause similar level of damage as they often behave irresponsibly when it comes to preserving the sanctity of these areas.

In conclusion, I feel travelling to remote locations can be beneficial if undertaken responsibly. 

Tobacco and alcohol are drugs that cause addition and health problems. Should they be made illegal? Or should all drugs be legalized? - Ielts Essay

Tobacco and alcohol are drugs that cause addition and health problems. Should they be made illegal? Or should all drugs be legalized?

 

Alcohol and Tobacco 

Rising incidences of disease resulting out of use of alcohol and tobacco has prompted many health experts to consider both these substances as drugs, and propose banning these of legalizing all drugs though there are voices of dissent.

Using alcohol and tobacco products has been conventionally regarded as being highly injurious to health of not only the direct users but also those around. Where cigarette, a common tobacco article, smoking  can cause more harm to passive smokers than users, alcohol, if consumed in excess, can turn people violent  often resulting in unwarranted consequences. To add to this, the most vulnerable groups to these substances are young, who if become nicotine or alcohol dependent, they are likely to damage to their health due to abuse, which would surely jeopardize the health of future generation.

However,  there are voices in support tobacco and alcohol: these substances have been a part of leisure since ages, if consumed in moderation and in private, they are unlikely to cause any harm to self or public. Moreover, imposing a ban would only help popularize these products, and risk of people buying and consuming spurious stuff would rise significantly, as has been experienced in many countries that tried banning these substances.

As far as, declaring all drugs  is concerned, it is better that narcotics should always remain out of reach of general public. Most of the intoxicants are highly addictive – even a moderate consumption can turn users into addicts. Not only this , drug abuse can permanently damage physical and mental  health, making drug abusers invalid.

To sum up, I personally feel, to ensure better health and safety of majority of populace on planet, it would be wise enough to let drugs continue to be considered as illegal though alcohol and tobacco articles should also be restricted but discreetly. 

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violent increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? - Ielts essay

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violent increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Can Death Penalty Prevent Violent Crimes? 

Ever rising incidence and intensity of criminal activities has pushed many to strongly vouch for continuation of severe punishment in form of death penalties though some feel that awarding death sentence is not required and would prove insufficient as far as curtailment of unlawful activities involving violence is concerned.

 

Extreme steps, like awarding death penalties to the perpetrators of crime of violence acts as a major deterrent; the offenders always fear execution if found and convicted. The fear of death is the biggest element that pushes one to dissuade themselves from participating in criminal endeavors which might result in physical harm to the victims. For instance, many empirical studies and analysis have revealed that introduction of death by execution statute in early twentieth century in some countries, and reinstatement in others across the globe, resulted in steady decline in the number of incidents involving violent acts. Now, the people feel safer are able to lead a peaceful life.

 

However, several deride this theory, as per them, the crimes of violence like homicides are in most cases committed due to the inherent animal instincts. For some, carrying out such acts is habit and a passion and no law of any severity can prevent criminals from involving themselves from such activities. Furthermore, brutal acts resulting in physical harm can often be a result of circumstances and not deliberate. This lobby is of  the view that reformation and rehabilitation could help those intending to commit such acts, introspect an think about the impact their endeavors  could have on others.  

Overall, I feel that capital punishment is an absolute necessity to ensure a crime free society. All other proposals presented in favor of abandoning it should be overlooked, after all public safety is of paramount importance.

Do the benefits of Eco Tourism far outweigh its drawbacks? Discuss and give your views.

Do the benefits of Eco Tourism far outweigh its drawbacks? Discuss and give your views. Discuss and give your opinion in at least 250 words 

 

Eco tourism - Ielts Essay 

Nowadays, Eco tourism is often being quoted as green tourism and it fast gaining prominence around the world. Many environmentalists and governments have started professing about the benefits of this branch of travelling, while there are several staunch critics who feel that Eco tourism is actually generating more problems than providing solutions.

Eco tourism is believed to be beneficial in many ways, as it does not exploit and disturb the sanctity of the location and the areas surrounding the sites being visited by the tourists. The green tourism also proves helpful for the locals living in that specific territory as it strives to involve locals living in and around the site of interest which ensures employment and self sufficiency for the local inhabitants. This in turn also prevents influx of outsiders in these areas thus helping in preserving the sanctity of the area.

Besides this, the eco tourism is also playing an important role in creating awareness about the importance of preserving environment. The areas being explored as part of nature tourist sites and spots are not developed on lines with the commercial tourism, i.e. they are left untouched and untamed. Educational travel based on natural attractions is also proving to be a promising medium of promoting social, economic, and environmental goals especially in developing nations.

However, nature tourism is also leading to destruction of forest and marine habitats and several wild species are being driven to the brink of extinction due to pressures created by of illegal hunting, logging, agriculture, and fishing. Furthermore, the poor nations who are maintaining these locations lack appropriate funding sources to manage and preserve them.

To conclude, I personally feel that although nature tourism has many demerits, its benefits cannot be overlooked and ignored. 

Many people think that the government should spend money to explore life in the outer space, while others think that it’s a waste of public money. Discuss both views and include your own opinion and examples.- Ielts Essay

Many people think that the government should spend money to explore life in the outer space, while others think that it’s a waste of public money. Discuss both views and include your own opinion and examples.

 

Space Exploration IELTS Essay 

As the race for exploring outer space gains momentum, a section of critics to this policy have started questioning the rationale behind allocating a huge financial outlay on this exercise. However, there are many supporters of the space programs being undertaken currently by governments across the world.

The Idea of going ahead with discovering the untouched domains beyond the atmosphere of the planet earth has always fascinated the human kind. This curiosity has gained more prominence as the scientists go ahead with trying to uncover the mysteries of the universe. As per them, probing into deeper space would help in unraveling many unknown secrets that have intrigued humanity over the centuries. This would in turn, not only allow us to know about the origins of humanity, but also open up new horizons of knowledge for the future generations.

Moreover, most of the latest innovations are a result of extensive solar system exploration. The biggest beneficiary of this activity has been the humanity itself, which, due to satellites in the space, is now having a better medium of communication and weather forecasting at its disposal. Besides this, many technologies and techniques have been developed or perfected with help of extensive experimenting in space, for instance semi conductor that was developed in weightlessness of space, i.e. out of our planet has assisted in improving the electronics and many other domains.

However, the detractors feel that money channelized into sending satellites or people out of planet could have been spent on better things like providing food, shelter, education and medical support to innumerable poor of the planet.

To sum up, in my point of view, whatever may be the case, the schemes aiming at exploring space has proven to be helpful and it should provided more impetus.  

Over the last few years more and more students enroll in universities. This situation creates competition among individuals. Do you agree or disagree? Is it a good or a bad development? - Ielts Essay

Over the last few years more and more students enroll in universities. This situation creates competition among individuals. Do you agree or disagree? Is it a good or a bad development?

 

Students Enroll in Universities

With academic excellence gaining prominence, a strange trend is developing among the pupils as everyone is seeking enrollment in varsities. This has given rise to a race of sorts among the younger generation to secure higher grades in the secondary studies. Some feel, this is surely a thing to worry about, while others look at the positive side of it.

Better academic qualifications have always been the objectives of pupils seeking academic excellence. To achieve this, the pupils tend to opt for reputed varsities that are equipped with better faculties and facilities. This has given rise to a stiff competition among the people as the number of seat available in departments of universities are limited which in turn has raised the cut-off percentages in selection lists.

Such neck to neck race would surely cast an unholy shadow on the current education system as other venues of imparting courses may become irrelevant shortly. There could be another negative impact on the education system as courses being hosted by the colleges and other alternatives institutions may not be considered suitable and adaptable thereby rendering the academic pursuits of students of these establishment inappropriate. This could finally lead to a collapse of the whole setup.

However, some educationists and planners feel that this is a positive development as the recent drift of pupils towards university would not inspire them to gain more proficiency in their elementary pursuits, but also help in developing their attitudes to obtain deeper knowhow in any discipline they pursue. Moreover, the institutions clubbed under non university categories would also be encouraged to raise the standards of academics and facilities being offered currently.

To sum up, I personally feel that the inclination for universities would bring around positive results in the long run.

“Prevention is better than cure”. Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

“Prevention is better than cure”. Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Providing appropriate healthcare services to the inhabitants of a country has always remained an important social initiative, but consistently rising per capita health expenditure has invited a debate on finding ways of cutting down public expenditure in this domain. Some have even suggested channelizing funds to programs aimed at encouraging prevention of ailments rather than combating them.

Diverting public money to initiatives aimed at teaching inhabitants about healthy practices can be more productive and fruitful as it would help in ensuring keeping various fatal and crippling diseases at bay, thereby reducing the need to manufacture and procure expensive medicines and equipment. This would enable the government to channelize the much precious funds to ensuring better life and facilities for the inhabitants of a country.

Furthermore, prioritizing creating awareness among masses about benefits of adopting and leading a healthy lifestyle over treating would result in improving the health index of society, especially in terms of fatal and crippling diseases. This, is turn would enhance the productivity of the society by shifting its focus to more vital areas rather than exploring ways to treat ailments.

However, reducing financial outlay and changing preferences from providing treatment to educating about healthy lifestyle and prevention of ailments could prove to be a disaster as the life is becoming complex and many people may not be receptive to the idea of leading a disciplined life. Moreover, certain illnesses and disorders occur due to unavoidable reasons especially those linked to the aging, complex lifestyle and pollution, for instances, some illnesses like arthritis start occurring naturally and cannot be prevented even by following a healthy lifestyle.

To sum up, I feel that government should keep both prevention and cure on priority and not focus only on one area - both of these enjoy equal relevance for effective healthcare interventions. 

Many parents use punishment to teach the different between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is unnecessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many parents use punishment to teach the different between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is necessary to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Punishment And Parenting

Parenting has always been a tricky job because it needs people to handle one of the most difficult beings on the planet, i.e. the children. This job can test the wits of parents especially when it comes to teaching the kids about differentiating between the good and bad. Involving some sort of punishment in teaching process is sometimes regarded as a critical component of parenting; however, critics despise this practice.

Juveniles are adventurous, immature and often prone to adopting ways of erratic behavior. Their inquisitive tender minds often lead them into exploring such activities and domains which should otherwise be avoided during growing years.  It is necessary to dissuade them from such expeditions and as per some parents, chastising is the best way is prevent the kids from taking up habits or involving themselves into such habits that have a potential of hampering their growth.

Furthermore, rebuke and reprimand have always been regarded as the short cuts to inciting discipline among the young ones. The fear of cane and verbal punishment have always deterred the growing kids from doing something over adventurous, and instead encouraged them to take up righteous path that is disciplined and fruitful. The kids disciplined at home are thought to grow up as those rational adults who know the difference between good and evil.

However, modern psychologists and social scientists disapprove and reject theory of rebuke. As per them, there is no place for punishment in a caring relationship and moreover, chastising can often result in severe consequences where the children either grow up as violent adults or take extreme steps in their growing years.

To sum up, I feel although the view of modern child psychologists holds true in contemporary era, traditional concept of upbringing cannot be completely overruled, making this practice relevant even today.  

Trees are essential for the existence of the human race as they provide the oxygen that we need to survive. Yet, daily all around the globe, large areas of woodland are being destroyed.

Trees are essential for the existence of the human race as they provide the oxygen that we need to survive. Yet, daily all around the globe, large areas of woodland are being destroyed. Many people feel that they as individuals can do nothing and that only governments and large companies can halt the destruction. To what extent do you agree with this?

 

Trees Are Important For Human Kind 

Rapidly shrinking forest cover has raised serious concerns among many countries and has shifted the focus of global society to finding viable ways of saving the planet from ecological disaster. Many environmentalists have come up with numerous suggestions and have called for individual participation but most people are clueless about this, though there are some who feel otherwise.

Common people would hardly be able to make any noticeable impact in a program of such colossal dimensions due to lack of necessary resources and authority to carry out such tasks. Initiatives aiming at saving green cover need infusion of extensive resources including money and manpower, and individual citizens do not have access to both. Furthermore, there is a lack of direction among citizens and most prefer to stay away from making contributions in such social initiatives. People feel that it would impossible for any program at the community level to survive in the long run without tangible contributions from government and corporate sector.

 Moreover, schemes such as saving Jungles need involvement of many countries at global level as saving greenery is not the responsibility of a single nation or an individual because this kind of initiative cannot make a big impact until and unless there is a full blooded intervention by various countries.

However, many people feel that each person can make sizable contributions. Any noble mission must start from the grass root level and it is people who can create awareness in the society about the ill effects of deforestation and generate public opinion aimed at protecting green cover.

In conclusion, I personally feel that although it is hard for people to go alone on this difficult and rather uphill task but their contributions in saving forest cover still can go a long way.   

Some say that young and energetic employees are the most valuable for the company, others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples, based on your own experience. - Sample Ielts Essay

Some say that young and energetic employees are the most valuable for the company, others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples, based on your own experience.

With several corporates aiming to reducing their size and optimize utilization of each resource, their focus has shifted to creating adaptive human resources policies which in turn profess weeding out unsuitable personnel to improve the productivity. This for some HR professionals means leaning towards retaining young people and axing older employees. This has raised a conflict of sorts among several sections on this issue.

The young people are fresh and raw and they have all the enthusiasm and desperation to prove their point which pushes them to strive for success and perform harder for the companies. Their constant struggle to ride up the hierarchical ranks inspires them to apply themselves more dedicatedly. Besides this, selection of younger personnel also guarantees infusion of fresh aspirations which in turn brings around several benefits in form of increased competitiveness.

Furthermore, selection of more and more workers belonging to the young age groups means significant reduction in the financial outlay allocated to welfare of the employees as the companies have to spend lesser amount of money on medical bills and other privileges otherwise extended to senior employees.

However, there are several strong contradictions to the priority selection policy of the human resources departments across the world as many experts feel that the presence of senior personnel does not only guarantee precise execution of each critical task within the company but also ensures presence of sufficient expertise for sound planning to take an organization forward. The veteran employees are often highly experienced and seasoned and they also have an in depth knowledge on intricacies of various conditions and ways of handling contingencies that a company may need to negotiate in due course of business.

In conclusion,  I personally that both the categories of employees is critical for an organization.

Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Damage to the environment is an inevitable

In the race for achieving more and more prosperity, the humans have started ignoring the plight of the natural environment that surrounds them. Some environmentalists consider this situation to be a recipe to disaster and feel the impending danger to the sanctity of the surroundings is now unavoidable though there are some who think otherwise and are quite optimistic about improvement in quality of environment.

The struggle and competition for attaining influential status at the global level and providing better life to citizens of country, governments of respective countries are encouraging establishment of more venues that fuel economic growth. As per them, only economic progress can guarantee better living quality for inhabitants. This belief is leading to extensive destruction of natural surroundings, e.g. forests and natural habitats are being cleared to make way for industry and facilities that fuel modern society. The loss in this case is irreversible and humanity may never get back whatever it loses.

Moreover, as the emphasis is on enhancing and boosting quality of life, various nodes connected to development have started carrying out expansive research on improving quality of products and services which is resulting in over consumption of natural resources. The natural resources are being extracted indiscriminately and at a startling pace thereby causing an irrevocable loss of naturally occurring minerals.

However, there are some who are quite optimistic about the safe future of the natural surroundings. They are inspired by the recent enthusiasm registered by the governments and people all over the world about thrifty use of energy and recycling of material. They feel humans would be able to salvage environment within a short span of time.

To sum up, I feel that fears being allayed about environmental damage due to development are true to a great extent.

There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? Discuss.

There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? Discuss.

International Music Vs Traditional Music 

Music has been an integral part of social and cultural aspirations since time unknown. Nothing much in this form of art has changed except that the styles have undergone a transformation. Today in globalized village, various,  international forms of music are in vogue  which has tempted some people to believe that local music is of no relevance in this scenario though there are people who believe otherwise.

Music is said to originate from the inner soul of humans and it sometimes helps in conveying direct and sometimes subtle hints about the seasons, feelings, moods and aspirations. Since ages humans have been singing, playing and listening to melodies in different forms all across the world to express joy, sadness, reluctance, anger and even seductive moods. Likewise, every region has its own specific music style and genre.

Nowadays, a new development seems to have influenced  this form art substantially as with advent of the globalization, more and more people have started swaying to the notes of international music forms like Jazz and Pop. Some people have started feeling that this era has no place for folk music as the global brotherhood makes local notes irrelevant and useless. As per them the use of local music highlights diversity which further nurtures tribal attitudes and bias among people.

However, some sections of society strongly feel that traditional and folk music of every region is the soul of local culture, and is laden with endless and depthless wisdom. Local notes also depict the way of thinking of natives playing them. Abandoning the region specific music would cause a major loss; all the connected content and relevant cognitive content would also be erased forever. 

To conclude, even though music in every manifestation enjoys a great relevance, I feel that traditional music can never be abandoned, for it represents the soul of a culture. 

Nowadays some governments encourage industrial factories and businesses to move out of large cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Discuss and give your opinion.

Nowadays some governments encourage industrial factories and businesses to move out of large cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Discuss and give your opinion.

 

Lareg Cities and Industry

As the large cities world over are becoming overtly congested and polluted, the governments of different countries have come out with ambitious plans to decongest larger urban areas by encouraging industries and businesses to relocate to other locations. Many have welcomed this idea while some have registered strong reservations against this kind of a move. 

The plan of moving factories, offices and manufacturing units out of urban locales, is believed to be laden with several benefits. A move like this would not only save the infrastructure and utility framework from collapsing but it would also offer a better quality of life for the inhabitants of big cities. Additionally, this would also help in disperse  population over wider region by generating opportunities in areas other than primary urban centers. Some even feel that this would also help in preventing the wastage of resources spent on upkeep of bigger metropolitan areas.

However, those critical to this theory feel that this move would prove to be a recipe fpe disaster in a multitude of ways:  moving the factories out to other areas would result in proliferating  pollution, and congestion, to the regions that do  hardly have any infrastructure to handle the increased influx of population and resulting activities. Furthermore, the cost outlay of relocating businesses would witness a ramarkable spike; they would have to spend more for making available even the basic facilities and utilities. Moreover, in other areas, availability of skilled labor in diverse specializations and expertise would be a big issue.

To sum up, I personally feel, this policy has more detriments than favors, and will surely prove to be catastrophic in the long run, affecting rural areas  adversely. An alternative plan that targets real issues that renders enduring solutions to urban areas, would be more useful. 

Many people keep dogs and cats as companions. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this practice.

Many people keep dogs and cats as companions. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of  this practice.

 

Add caption

Humans have been domesticating animals since they started settling down in form of communities and settlements. Canine and feline animals have been considered to be closer to heart by some people. This practice has also drawn flak from other members of community who feel that keeping pets is inhuman and cause of disturbance to others and this practice should be discontinued.

Keep canine and feline animals as pets is quoted as merit laden concept by many people. As per them, these animals are human friendly and they successfully adapt themselves to the conditions in which their human masters live without many changes in their own living rhythms. These four legged beings also sometimes fill the void of lonely people who either live alone or do not have families and children. Besides being considered as companions by lonely people, some families consider these humble beings as part of families.

Besides filling the voids, animals like dogs also act as guards and protectors for the families and people living around. Many families love to keep specific breed of hunting and guard dogs as they help in maintaining a strict vigil against any unwanted intruders and trespassers inside the colonies and neighborhood. Similarly, felines are considered to be good antidotes against pests like rats and moles.

On other hand, there are many detractors to this practice. As per them these animals are a big nuisance for the neighborhood. People often complain of disturbance by these very pets on account of disturbance because of consistent barking by domesticated dogs day and night and cats sneaking into next doors and creating ruckus. Moreover, children of neighborhood often run the risk of being bitten by these pets.

To conclude, I personally feel that keeping pets has more benefits than drawbacks.