Nowadays many young people deliberately damage public places. What are the causes and solutions?

 Nowadays many young people deliberately damage public places. What are the causes and solutions?

Cause 

• Misplaced conception of freedom of expression 
• Lack of counseling about how to vent their anger 
• Lack of education about the relevance of communal properties - youth are completely oblivious of this fact that public places are funded by taxpayers’ money and hold a great importance for society 
• Lack of empathy towards surroundings 
• Lack of accountability 
• An intent to highlight their fearless  attitude 
• Absence of proper measures to counter such acts 

Measures to counter such acts 

• Educating them about the significance of such places and the impact of their actions
• Holding them,or their families, accountable for such damage and making them bear the expenditure of such damage 
• Punitive measures: penalty and punishment 
• Installing proper security for such location 

Vandalism has become a new normal for contemporary youngsters, for they are driven by several factors: lack of counseling, and absence of appropriate mechanisms to counter such behaviour, but there are ways to curtail this trend. The following paragraphs shall discuss the causes and suggest some measures to control this unsocial propensity.

To commence with, the most prominent source of this illegal conduct is the misplaced notion about using freedom of expression, which persuades the youth to resort to causing harm to the communal assets, by either defacing them, or damaging them. To corroborate, during anti-racism protests by the youth, across Europe in 1998, many participants went on to paint graffiti or important government buildings, and uprooted fences. A majority of these protestors admitted that they considered this as their right to highlight their dissent.

Similarly, regimes across the world have failed to acknowledge this problem, and are yet to enact proper laws that are sufficiently-equipped to mitigate such instances to discourage this kind of attitude. Law enforcement agencies across the world are helpless since they are not empowered by statutory support, and perpetrators walk scott-free after committing such offences.

As far as dissuading this appalling practice is concerned, there is a dire need to enlighten the upcoming generation about the ways to regulate their anger; significance of public property and the consequences of damaging them. Moreover, the police must be armed with powers to apprehend and punish those engaged in vandalization of common public areas. These steps, if applied prudently, can go a long way in alleviating this complication.

In hindsight, ignorance about acceptable social behaviour and lack of tools to discourage it, are encouraging young vandals, but, although not a panacea, a blend of persuasive, and punitive measures, can help to some extent.  

Introduction 1

Of late, the incidents of vandalism involving youngsters have been witnessing an up swing. This trend is driven by several factors, like lack of counseling, and absence of appropriate mechanisms to counter such behaviour, making it imperative to find ways to curtail it.

Introduction 2  

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do. However, others disagree and say that they should be allowed freedom. Discuss both views and give your opinion

 Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do. However, others disagree and say that they should be allowed freedom. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

Agree  

• Lack of laws will precipitate lawlessness/ anarchy 

• There will be inequality 

• Certain norms also define civil behavior

• Allows perpetuation of traditions and culture  

Disagree 

• Some think that this can quell creativity 

• Some even think that rules are made by rich to overwhelm the poor 

T

A school of thought supports complying with certain social norms, and  legal frameworks, to create a conducive social environment, but the other section proposes liberation from any such setup. The following paragraphs shall analyze both the views, and highlight the relevance of the former opinion. 

To start with, making it mandatory for everyone to adhere to the enacted edicts, can help ensure bringing order to a social arrangement by aiding in circumventing anarchy, so as to allow citizens to lead their life peacefully, and without inhibitions of being harmed by unlawful elements. For instance, every country has appropriate regulations in place to penalize those infringing laws and causing damage to others. 

Similarly, these settings empower every inhabitant of the nation to exercise their rights to access fundamental amenities like government support, education, and health among others, and also, fight against injustice. To corroborate, the Indian government has imposed special guidelines and provisions  to safeguard and protect the homeowners from being defrauded by those constructing houses. This has effectively curtailed malpractices by the builder lobby that was prone to cheating the middle and low income groups.

Nevertheless, those rebelling against following any convention or norms put forth unsubstantiated allegations such as the rules be only defined to shield the effluent and influential, exploit the deprived and marginalized, and suppress them while benefiting the former. However, even historically, such bias has been sporadic and never received support from any regime or rulers, otherwise society would never have developed where it stands today.

To cap it all, strictures and conventions insulate people from lawlessness, and disarray, and at the same time, equip them with privileges to defend themselves and their assets, and in the process, nipping the evil in its buds and protecting society from going astray.

Traditionally, every community and nation has enacted certain norms and legal frameworks to organise the social environment, affording it an orderly facade and internal functional mechanism, but the other section there is up and arms against such a setup and advocates liberation from such surroundings. I feel complying with the latter view could prove to be a recipe for disaster.

Intro2 

The debate surrounding the issue of complying with certain social norms and legal frameworks is the most heated: while some wholeheartedly lend their support to this system, others advocate liberation from any boundations. The former view is founded on a well-thought and judicious philosophy, and thus, deemed acceptable. 

Intro3

Some people believe that manufacturers and supermarkets should minimise the packaging material used. However, others think that consumers should avoid heavily packaged goods. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some people believe that manufacturers and supermarkets should minimise the packaging material used. However, others think that consumers should avoid heavily packaged goods. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

There has always been a profound debate over who should take the responsibility for reducing over packaging. Some feel that producers and sellers  should address this situation at their end, others believe that consumers must take this opportunity to minimize packing. 

To begin with, the former lobby believes those producing and selling goods should take the initiative to curtail the trend of heavily packing their produce. It will help them in saving the operational costs, ranging from spending on procuring required packing materials to transportation and levies, consequently,  raising their profit margins. Beside this, this will resolve the problem from where it stems, reducing the need for any other intervention and instead assisting in preserving the natural resources and energy.  

Nevertheless, the latter view vouches for a role of customers in this endeavor.  They being a prominent source of consumption, have the power to increase or decrease the demand of goods. If they abstain from purchasing such merchandise, the factories and shops will be forced to respond quickly since they cannot afford to stock their unsold produce and bear heavy costs. This will eventually cause them losses and thus to avoid such situations, they will have to make improvements in the packing strategies. 

Moreover, consumers enjoy the power of  forming opinions and joining hands, eventually pushing regimes to intervene and enact appropriate laws to prevent usage of surfeit packing. There have been instances in the past where the citizens prevailed upon the state to make laws to curtail use of raw material that was overdrawn from nature.  

In hindsight, I opine that the issue of overpacked goods can be handled by industrialists and consumers effectively by making joint efforts since they are both inseparable components of the society and support each other.

Some people believe that hospitals should spend more money on new medical technology, while others argue that those funds should be allocated to doctors and nurses. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 Some people believe that hospitals should spend more money on new medical technology, while others argue that those funds should be allocated to doctors and nurses. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

A fierce debate has ensued regarding the investments in the healthcare sector, some assert that it is paramount to allocate funds to state-of-the-art methods and medical equipment, whereas some posit that prioritizing medical caregivers is necessary. I would analyze this notion profoundly while hunting with hounds and running with hares. 

Channelizing  monetary resources to equip healthcare environment with up-to-date medical tools: modern scanning machines, laser treatments, lab test, to name a few  will prove to be a blessing; this will assist the professionals to diagnose the diseases precisely, and at an earlier: cancer at an early stage, resulting in dispension of a better treatment to the patients, in terms of surgery, medicines, tests, and many more. 

Additionally, the technologies: AI,  could aid healthcare teams to save invaluable time; most of the tasks will be undertaken by robots. The automatic machines will complete their duties independently, saving immense time and human intervention required to finalize treatments, speeding up the process and mitigating waiting times for those ailing. To corroborate, implementing AI in the USA has precipitated relief for the sick as they can now access regular checkups and necessary therapies quickly.

However, doctors and nurses play a vital role in the medical care, and thus must  get precedence; these specialists boast of the expertise required to assess, prescribe and alter treatments; and monitor progress of those suffering from disease, disorders, and so on, something irreplaceable. Similarly,  technology can never mimic humans; the latter can provide ill with human touch and empathy - motivation and positive attitude to overcome disease, and many more.

In hindsight, both technology and staff are pivotal to an effective healthcare framework. Therefore,  both must enjoy equal relevance when thinking about investing resources for improvements; ignoring any of these would engender an imbalance.

Some believe that the government should support artists like musicians, painters, and poets, while others argue that this is a misuse of funds.

 Some believe that the government should support artists like musicians, painters, and poets, while others argue that this is a misuse of funds. 

Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Why? These people do not have resources to support them 

• They represent the culture and tradition and help perpetuate these  further: this has been historically proven 

• Their work reflects the condition of society 

• These people have a pivotal in bringing around revolutions

• They are also responsible for helping society become visible 

This is wastage of money 

• Funds could be used to alleviate problems like poverty 

• Funds could be used to carry out research and improve technology 

The idea of the state affording financial support to those performing various kinds of arts, invites mixed views, with some supporting this, others rejecting it. 

The advocates of such funding propose that individuals engaged in realms of music, painting, and poetry, to name a few, enjoy a special position in society; they are the sole medium of perpetuating the knowledge and wisdom, accumulated by ancestors over the eons, about history, culture, rituals, and traditions, down the generations. In absence of these societies would lose its identity, due to being disconnected from its past, and fade away soon. However, these exponents lack money to survive and carry out this critical duty, making it imperative for society to bolster them, and policy makers being the true representatives for the country must take ownership in this endeavor. 

Similarly, these art practitioners don other important roles of entertaining and informing the inhabitants of the nation about the conditions of their surroundings, and challenges facing them. To corroborate, poems and songs, especially the traditional genre, have not only amused their audiences but also helped them to enlighten themselves about social evils/stigma, and persuade them to abandon such practices.

Nevertheless, those critical of such initiatives tend to present the same old argument that these monetary resources instead of being squandered in such useless undertakings, would have been used to alleviate illiteracy and poverty, and render better healthcare and amenities to the marginalized, but their different objections fall flat as preserving all manifestations of art is as crucial as progressing.

In hindsight, the critics will be critics, and bound to doubt every noble move, nonetheless extending all possible assistance to musicians, poets, and so on, should continue, for this is the only way to sustain continuity of social and cultural values.  

Introduction 1

The public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the issue that should the state afford financial support to those performing various kinds of art. While some are in favor of this, others profess that the monetary resources could be used in other more critical areas.

Introduction 2

There is a fierce debate between different schools of thought when it comes to the issue of the state affording financial support to those performing various kinds of art, since some are in favor of this, others consider it as a useless exercise, and recommend better use of resources.

Introduction 3

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

A fierce debate has ensued regarding the factors that the businesses should consider while hiring personnel: some advocate opting for those who are resourceful and can operate autonomously, whereas others vouch for ones with ability to engage as team members. I feel both the perceptions hold substance; selection depends on the typical organizational needs.   

Appointing employees with the ability to execute tasks using their imaginative traits without any external guidance, or intervention can help an organization to run independent profit centers. Such individuals are internally motivated, and are capable of making decisions, and completing the work without needing continuous supervision.They are generally well-adapted to functioning in remote locations, project based undertakings, and carrying out research in disparate areas, where autonomy plays a paramount role and obstacles: consistent control and interference from other departments, are missing. To corroborate, Elon Musk admits  Tesla benefitting from this model by engaging creative people in independently-managed endeavors aimed at discovering new technologies: their premier product, the electric car.  

Nevertheless, barring a few venues where inventions are targeted, most other departments of modern undertakings must be populated by the staff that can synchronise their jobs with their counterparts in other divisions, by virtue of their operations and productivity hinging on the efficiency churned out by others sections. To exemplify, the business turnover of the sales department heavily relies on efficient execution of tasks by manufacturing and planning, supply chain management and after sales service. In these cases communication, collaboration, and sharing of responsibility take the center stage, mandating employing efficient team players.

In hindsight, selecting personnel with ingenuity and capability to operate independently, or opting for ones to function in a group, depends on distinctive requirements: their aim is to create the best fit that can help attain organizational objectives.        

Crime is a problem all over the world. Some believe that crime prevention will make no difference, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion

 Crime is a problem all over the world. Some believe that crime prevention will make no difference, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 

Antisocial activities, undoubtedly, are a menace for society, and several policies are adopted to vanquish this social malady, but can something really help make surroundings safer from unlawful elements is fiercely debated. While some express pessimism, others reflect optimism.  

Some lobby behind the notion that measures adopted to impede unlawful acts can make a huge difference. Reformation is a potent tool that makes those engaged in illegal endeavors to reform themselves and join back the mainstream. These include training criminals in alternative trades to allow them to make a living without harming others. Too corroborate, in India, in the 1980s dreaded dacoits of the notorious Ravines of Chambal were offered general amnesty and land to help them to adopt socially acceptable ways of life. This had a phenomenal impact as most of the notorious brigands such as Phoolan Devi reverted to civil life and also served as the member of parliament. 

However, the skeptics argue that antisocial activities are driven by socioeconomic conditions like poverty, unemployment and illiteracy, forcing the affected individuals to resort to illegal methods to fulfill their needs. Moreover, the class struggle between the affluent and the deprived also causes people to embrace unlawful ways  to bridge the gaps. Further, it is undeniable that unless the nexus between the antisocials elements and their patrons from influential class is not breached, nothing can bring a change as those committing infringements walks scott free and are emboldened to repeat those endeavors. Thus, if the root causes are untouched, all efforts will remain futile. 

Overall, while measures of dissuasion might not completely eradicate crime, it can significantly mitigate its impact and contribute to safer society. Combining a variety of approaches and engaging all stakeholders can lead to a more comprehensive and effective crime prevention strategy.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

• To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

• Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. 

Why make law? 

• Initially people will follow the legal statute without question

• Gradually, they will start understanding the relevance of recycling

• Others will also take up the practice 

• After a generation has passed, this exercise will become a social ritual    

Why not? 

• Law will be too harsh a step: recycling is a  relatively new concept in rudimentary stage 

• People do not have knowledge and resources 

• Spreading awareness is a better way

• Monetary benefits 

It is suggested by many that recycling should be made a law to persuade the domestic sector to embrace it completely. How far this proposal can be deemed acceptable is a matter that needs critical analysis before arriving at a plausible verdict.

To commence with, it has been observed that all efforts and resources invested in persuading households to recycle the refuse at homes, have failed miserably, and the production of the garbage continues (unabated) without restrictions. Therefore, turning this system into a legally binding obligation will force everyone to follow it without giving it a second thought since its non-compliance will invite penalties and punishments, which no one will be prepared to bear. For instance, when the government of New York, in 2020, imposed the blanket ban on pressure horns within the city, every New Yorker immediately removed these equipment from their vehicles. 

Similarly, it is undeniable that when someone, even out of fear, starts practicing/following  a procedure, they start comprehending the relevance behind such an exercise, and make it an integral part of their daily regime. To corroborate, after helmets were made compulsory in India, some had registered their protest, nonetheless gradually, they realised how significant this safety gear was for their life, and now every two-wheeler rider in India uses it. Moreover, such a move will help ensure that the current and the subsequent generations start reusing their old material as a part of their everyday routine. It has been experienced that when one adopts something as their habit, their children  take it up as a ritual.

In hindsight, only a law can encourage a quick response from  the citizens and  force them to recycle their household waste and unused material without reluctance, and eventually make it a social custom.  

Introduction 1

Recycling may have become a buzzword, but it is felt that this process is not being embraced  whole-heartedly by the domestic sector, so to make it a regular regime it is suggested that a law should be enacted to make it mandatory for all. I concur with this proposal in absolute terms, and shall elaborate my stand in the following paragraphs.

Introduction 2

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

 

Should long-term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?

Should the state persuade those people who have been jobless since a long time and have been receiving unemployment grants, to do some free services?  

 

If yes 

• These people would help the state save some money otherwise invested in hiring paid workforce. This way, these individuals would be doing something productive for society. 

• This would also enable the government  to convince tax-payers that their hard-earned money is not being squandered to help unproductive people. 

• Idle mind is the devil’s workshop:  This could also help the jobless themselves: they would stay away from depressing thoughts, or participating in illegal activities to overcome boredom. 

• *********These people could also strike a job in alternative fields when they work in those fields as volunteers.  

NO

• This could make them feel dejected and alienated, as they are not jobless because of their fault, but have been trying to get jobs. Working in those occupations may hurt their sentiments and take a toll on their self-esteem. 

• Others could also follow these precedents and may leave their jobs to work in voluntary services and earn unemployment benefits. This would be disastrous for the society and the economy 

Several countries extend long term grants to the jobless, but should the latter be engaged in community services to reciprocate for the social support, it is a matter that needs to be delved deeper into before arriving at a plausible conclusion. 

To begin with, involving the recipients of long-term unemployment benefits in unpaid services would enable them to pay back something to the society in the form of savings made in monetary terms. These individuals would replace the paid labor in various spheres and expertise; consequently, governments would be spared of paying salaries and other benefits. For instance, a similar policy has been implemented in various provinces of Australia, has created a win-win  situation for both, the benefactors and beneficiaries as local regimes can use the funds saved for such endeavors to support the unemployed.

Similarly, this could prove to be extremely favorable for those without a job: they could use their spare time to do something productive, instead of going astray and embracing illegal activities, or suffering mental affliction, like depression. Additionally, they could also foster skills, and network, in alternative trades, which could land them an employment.

Nevertheless, there is a darker side to this arrangement despite it remaining uncommon, for it might have  a knock-on effect by virtue of some following the precedents of their jobless counterparts, and embracing such settings. This could reduce the number of people engaged in active economic endeavors that generate value. However, these fears lack substance since few want to remain jobless: surviving on subsistence money is not a voluntary choice. 

In hindsight, although those with a job, and getting the state support, engaging in unpaid work is an individual prerogative, this scheme can prove to be exceedingly rewarding for the affected individuals and the society.      

Introduction 1

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the issue whether the jobless beneficiaries of government grants since long should engage in community services as a means to reciprocate for the social support, with some supporting this proposal, and others rejecting it. I feel this should be an individual prerogative and not a forced decision.

Introduction 2

Engaging the jobless beneficiaries of government grants since long in community services is a proposal that even though that seems to be the best way to reciprocate for social support, I feel this should be an individual prerogative and not a forced decision.

Introduction 3 

Some people believe that hospitals should spend more money on new medical technology, while others argue that those funds should be allocated to doctors and nurses. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 Some people believe that hospitals should spend more money on new medical technology, while others argue that those funds should be allocated to doctors and nurses. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Why technology 

• Help in better diagnosis and dispension of treatment - medications and surgery 

• Faster and better treatment - reducing convalescing / recuperating period 

 Why doctors and nurses 

• Medical caregivers are the ones who can interpret findings by machines 

• They are the ones who using their experience dispense treatment 

• They are one who nurse back the sick to good health 

• The human touch 

Several lobbies are found sparring over where investments should go in healthcare: state-of-the-art methods and tools, or medical care givers. Undeniably, the role of both is indispensable, so I recommend striking a balance between these two areas. 

Infusing  resources into augmenting technological aspects of the medical domain will certainly help introduce sophisticated instruments and apparatus, and techniques, to assist in diagnosing the disease with unprecedented accuracy, and rendering interventions, like surgeries, precision. To corroborate, ultra-modern MRI machines can pinpoint the affected areas, which a human eye cannot do, and robotic surgeries are helping surgeons perform their task with unprecedented perfection, heightening their skills exponentially.

However,  although engendering modernization in the equipment and strategies in hospitals is paramount, it is said that “You cannot be half pregnant”, and thus, physicians and nursing staff cannot be disregarded: they need to be allocated a similar weightage. Undeniably, assessing the symptoms and severity of ailments is the human forte, and no device can emulate this; the latter can only spit out figures and numbers, while correctly interpreting the figures, and deciding the extent of treatment is only possible through human intellect.  

Additionally, it is the medical practitioners and other workers who use their empathetic  approach to aid the ailing in recuperating. There have been several instances where even the most hopelessly sick have managed to get back on their feet, and convalesce, owing to the moral support and friendly approach of doctors and nurses. Thus,  it is imperative to acknowledge their contribution, and render them resources to help uplift their skills and spirits, as well. 

In hindsight,  allotting equal importance to both the avenues:technology and health professionals is extremely essential since turning back towards either of them would create imbalance and chaos and turn the healthcare environment inefficient.

Intro 1 The debate surrounding investments in different avenues in healthcare is the most heated, with some proposing prioritizing state-of-the-art tools and methods, others vouching for medical care givers. Both the partisan factions cite plausible reasons to bolster their views, but I am in favor of striking a balance between the two. Intro 2 There is a serious debate over the issue as to who should be allocated priority for investments in healthcare: some propose that it should be state-of-the-art tools and methods, others vouch for medical care givers. This essay shall profoundly analyze this discourse and exhibit its support for both the opinions.