Some people believe that it is better to keep criminals in prison for longer ,while other’s disagree and say that we must find a different solution .Discuss both views and give your opinion?

 Some people believe that it is better to keep criminals in  prison for longer ,while other’s disagree and say that we must find a different solution .Discuss both views and give your opinion? 

Some people believe that awarding longer prison sentences is the most appropriate way to mitigate crime, while others claim that alternative measures would be more beneficial. This essay will examine both perspectives and provide my opinion.

To start with, those advocating awarding stretched penitentiary terms, feel this can help alleviate incidence of antisocial endeavors, by ensuring that criminals remain away from society for a stipulated period, thereby guaranteeing public safety.  Moreover, the likelihood of repeated partaking will also attenuate; the fear of being locked up in a prison cell may serve as a deterrent from engaging in deviant behavior. Studies have proved that such penalties can significantly reduce illegal acts since one is forced to think twice before resorting to breaking the law.  

On the other hand, it is suggested, nowadays, that alternative approaches: education, rehabilitation programs and early intervention, can also be extremely  effective in quelling antisocial undertakings. Rehabilitating perpetrators  seeks on reintegrating them with the mainstream by equipping them with soft skills, education, and psychological support. Programs that provide vocational training, mental health therapy, and substance abuse treatment, help reduce relapsing rates by addressing the root causes of criminal behavior. 

Moreover, many infringements are by-products of poverty, illiteracy, and unstable family conditions. Investing in early education, mentorship programs, and skill development initiatives can prevent individuals from engaging in instances, wherein  they have to take the law into their own hands. These methods can  go a long way in reforming deviant minds and also saving invaluable tax money invested into creating jail infrastructure. 

To conclude, while lengthening prison sentences can play a role in crime prevention by deterring potential offenders and ensuring public safety, alternative measures that help nip the evil in its bud can  be equally significant. A balanced approach is thus suggested. 

Modern communications mean that it is no longer necessary to write letters. However, others say letter writing cannot be forgotten. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

 Modern communications mean that it is no longer necessary to write letters. However, others say letter writing cannot be forgotten. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 

Undeniably, technological advancement has precipitated numerous state-of-the-art devices and methods of communicating, resulting in persuading many to abandon the traditional ways, but some posit that the conventional methods cannot be replaced. I would analyze both the sides of this argument profoundly and deliver a plausible verdict.

The introduction of gadgets comprising umpteen applications: Whatsapp, email, Instagram, Telegram, and many more, has afforded speed, and ease of use, to all while connecting  with their loved ones; this has proved to be a blessing for those residing away from home, for they can interact with their loved ones through phone calls, and messages without delay. However, using letters required humongous efforts to write first, and exhausted several days to reach the desired destination, resulting in stretching the process to several weeks if not months.

Additionally, now one does not have to have legible writing and also learn spellings, something that was a cause of trouble for many; software-assisted word processors can type any amount of words quickly, and also check spellings and grammar. Moreover, these apps have facilitated those suffering from impairment, allowing them to use voice or video calls, or even speech to text facilities, to communicate. 

Nevertheless, some assert that the ancient practice of writing letters cannot be discounted; this aids one in enhancing their linguistic abilities by virtue of scribbling words on the paper regularly, and working fingers to the bones to write the letters, attracts receivers to read these with focus, encouraging them to render well-thought replies. 

In hindsight, despite both the opinions holding true in their own virtue, the modern tools are beneficial; allowing communication quickly, and letting one forgo the hard work of writing and remembering words, so the up-to-date gadgets should be given more preference.

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Work in team

• Effective management- Collaborative skills, decision making
• Completing tasks on scheduled time 

Work individually

• More concentration on work- less mistakes

• Implement enhanced problem solving methods

• Better marketing ideas

A fierce debate has ensued regarding the factors that the businesses should consider while hiring personnel: some advocate opting for those who are resourceful and can operate autonomously, whereas others vouch for ones with ability to engage as team members. I feel both the perceptions hold substance; selection depends on the typical organizational needs.   

Appointing employees with the ability to execute tasks, using their imaginative traits, independent of any external guidance, can help an organization to run independent profit centers. Such individuals are internally motivated, capable of making decisions, and completing the work without needing continuous supervision.They are generally well-adapted to functioning in remote locations, project based undertakings, and carrying out research in disparate areas, where autonomy plays a paramount role and obstacles: consistent control and interference from other departments, are missing. To corroborate, Elon Musk admits  Tesla benefitting from this model by engaging creative people in independently-managed endeavors aimed at discovering new technologies: their premier product, the electric car.  

Having said that, barring a few venues where inventions are targeted, most other departments of modern undertakings must be populated by the staff that can synchronise their jobs with their counterparts in other divisions, by virtue of their operations and productivity hinging on the efficiency churned out by others sections. To exemplify, the business turnover of the sales department heavily relies on efficient execution of tasks by manufacturing and planning, supply chain management and after sales service. In these cases communication, collaboration, and sharing of responsibility take the center stage, mandating employing efficient team players.

In hindsight, selecting personnel with ingenuity and capability to operate independently, or opting for ones to function in a group, depends on distinctive requirements: their aim is to create the best fit that can help attain organizational objectives.  

Today's society provides people with various ways to lose weight, such as special diets or exercise regimes. Many people believe that poor food and today's lifestyle should be addressed first. What is your opinion?

 Today's society provides people with various ways to lose weight, such as special diets or exercise regimes. Many people believe that poor food and today's lifestyle should be addressed first. What is your opinion?

Poor lifestyle and food

• Technological advancement persuades individuals utilize gadgets for long hours

• Most people consume fast food, adverse effect on health

Special diets and exercise regimes

Temporary solution for lose weight

May have side effects

                

A  common perception revolves around the concept of opting for special meals and physical endeavors to assist in weight regulation, but some challenge this, and attribute corpulence to be an outcome of faulty food habits and ways of life.  

Daily  regimes and choice of nourishment have gone astray: a majority are wedded to excessive consumption of junk food; although these eatables are lip-smacking, and accessible at affordable prices, these have severe ramifications for health; they contain excessive sugar, oil, and gluten, to name a few, predisposing one to tremendous weight gain. Therefore, one should abandon the habit of frequent ingestion of highly processed meals and prioritize the homemade options; the latter are way more nutritious and assist in controlling weight, and helping sustain it for long.

Additionally, poor daily routines add to woes, the introduction of numerous state-of-the-art gadgets persuades individuals, especially youngsters to devote colossal time to browsing social media, and playing video games, thereby promoting sedentary lifestyle, resulting in putting one kilos due to paucity of physical endeavors: walking, and sport, among others, that can assist metabolizing  calories, enabling one to stay in shape.

 However, the modern perspective reflects reliance on specially synthesized meals, or exercising,  a blend of which is perceived to encourage the populace to shrink their girth around their waists quickly, but it has been witnessed that those following this practice are, although able to shed a stone rapidly, they again become obese after abandoning such regimen; thus, it is a temporary solution to tone up. 

In hindsight, I am unconvinced by the recently introduced undertakings aimed at affording fitter physical wellness through the much promoted nutrition, and physical workout systems, since these are ephemeral in nature, one needs enduring solutions to circumvent obesity: a disciplined lifestyle and balanced meals.  

Some people believe that school children should learn some practical skills like car maintenance, opening a bank account or learning about other traditional skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?

 Some people believe that school children should learn some practical skills like car maintenance, opening a bank account or learning about other traditional skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?

A strong argument appears to be surfacing, nowadays, that practical knowledge is an imperative element of the school going children. However, despite offering umpteen benefits, this proposal lacks substance and promises a myriad of challenges. This essay shall examine this notion profoundly and shall elucidate inclination in the following paragraphs.

 To embark upon discussion, a prominent lobby strongly propounds that affording academic knowledge to the school goers, should be accompanied with training in practical abilities: carrying out minor repairs in the vehicles, can be extremely helpful in times of emergency like flat tyre or an engine overheat; transacting in banks and other financial institutions, like depositing cash and using ATM machines, opening a bank account and signing a cheque, to name a few can be of immense support in later life.

 On the flip side, another school of thought opposes and argues that this will be a sheer waste of invaluable time, for this is likely to cause deviations and distractions from their academic pursuits, making young minds lose their focus, eventually leading to poor grades in the long run. Consequently, some might fail to get admitted into renowned universities. A recent study revealed that the children aging from 13-16 are most vulnerable to bad influence and lose interest in studies faster than any other age group and hence, should be motivated to concentrate only on academics till they clear their higher education.

To recapitulate, disputes aside, even though there may be numerous pros to this phenomenon, but nonetheless the pitfalls clearly eclipse the former and it can be safely asserted that young pupils should be made to prioritize their primary objective, gaining academic finesse at formal tuition.

Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

 Some say that if anyone would be given a choice between ‘not working’ and ‘working most of the time’, they would choose not to work. Do you agree or disagree?

Some sections are of the view that young individuals must work towards their goals and also step out of their comfort zone to achieve them, while others are averse to this as this entails enduring hardships, and thus dissent with this notion. This matter needs to be critically analyzed.

To begin with, a lobby propounds that having inclination towards some ambition can help create awareness about the new developments in the surroundings as well as one can gain knowledge about their domain. To exemplify this, many topnotch scientists agree that while working hard in their field, they encompassed new technologies which helped them to incorporate them to make several novel inventions, especially artificial intelligence, and fetch them popularity.

Moreover, to realize aims, one is persuaded to think out of the box and involve themselves to be more creative,  setting them apart from others, and hence, making them experience the exploits of their hard work not only in financial but also in professional terms. For instance, M.S Hussain, a renowned artist, admits that those like him who have experimented with their own work, with a desire to usher radical changes, bring updated versions of their masterpiece, making them more  innovative, and churn out exquisite artwork.

However, some fear that following this strategy, and dread defining aims; this would afford depression and demotivation, and thus, expose  them to physical and mental afflictions. Furthermore, by virtue of not being triumphant, they will have to detach themselves from their social circles and resign into oblivion, condemning themselves to isolated dungeons of misery.

In hindsight, disputes aside, I vehemently opine that one has to seriously get familiar with the practice of settling for certain ambitions to help them realize their true potential and learn to surmount challenges.  

Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

DISAGREE 

• Rendering a window to the people - both hosts and guests - to appreciate diversity and interact with each other in a cordial and conducive environment: helps remove misplaced notions about disparate ethnicities by providing an opportunity for an open interaction. This is a two way communication, both appreciate the differences, building bridges and fuelling a feeling of brotherhood.  

• A strange but pleasant  bonhomie develops between both the sides, the visitors and the visited, when former come and appreciate and shower praises for the hospitality. 

• Advent of alien travellers opens up venues of employment and business for the locals, both directly and indirectly. This makes  the natives proud of their society and persuades them to adopt a friendly attitude towards the aliens, which is reciprocated in similar manner   

AGREE 

Tourism is hampering relations rather than building bonds 

1. Contra view is held by conservatives and purists: it is their fear that aliens bring along their mannerisms - which may be incompatible with the local aspirations and customs -  and influence locals, especially youngsters, in undesirable ways. This can cause distortions in local ways of life. 

2. Some tourists, although rarely,behave erratic and which can offend locals

3. The litter and pollution that results due to foreign tourists, is cleaned by levying taxes on the local inhabitants. 

Although tourism has become a prolific sector that is generating humongous economic opportunities, it is often criticized for engendering discord among people hailing from disparate cultural backgrounds. However, this perception is misplaced and can be challenged on several grounds.

The  resurgence nomadic culture of bagpackers has led to opening doors for a conducive dialogue between peoples belonging to diverse region of the globe; those travelling to experience the diversity of traditions and ways of life, tend to interact with hosts with liberal and empathetic mindset, and are reciprocated with warm and friendly  treatment, helping generate harmony among both the parties. To corroborate, a long term study by the World Travel and  Tour Organization, spanning over 20 years, has found that an overwhelming number of tourists admitted returning home with enriching experiences about different ways of life. Similarly, the destination societies also expressed satisfaction about receiving visitors from other parts of the world, serving them, and getting to know about the customs and beliefs of the guests. 

Nonetheless, those critical of this activity  quote quite infrequent incidents to  malign the image of this industry. They say that alien visitors bring along their mannerism, disregard local aspirations, expectations and ways of life making hosts feel (very cautious) wary of foreigners entering into their country. Nevertheless, these allegations have little substance, especially in the modern times that are dominated by information revolution, and those travelling for leisure and enjoyment have developed the propensity to not only inform/ enlighten themselves about the food, language, and clothing, but also about the native etiquettes overruling any chance of conflicts. 

In hindsight, disputes aside, this notion cannot be deemed acceptable at all, for this sector is bridging gaps between heterogeneous societies, and helping forge a congenial global environment that sans bitterness. 

Long distance flight consumes the amount of fuel that a car uses for many years and pollutes the air. Some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourists travel, rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Long distance flight consumes the amount of fuel that a car uses for many years and pollutes the air. Some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourists travel, rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The ubiquity of air travel, especially one covering vast distances, has found itself in the eye of storm, and allegedly cog in the wheel of the environment imbroglio, besides causing wastage of fuel, thereby persuading  environmentalists to curb unnecessary use of this facility, instead of proscribing cars. However, this suggestion lacks foresight, and cannot be considered plausible. 

Advocates of such policy assume that an airborne aircraft tends to burn surfeit propellant, and releases emissions profusely, causing deterioration in the quality of air, so curtailing use of this medium of travelling to distance locales would mitigate pollution by alleviating discharge of effluents and greenhouse gases,  easing the situation greatly. 

Nevertheless, this postulation sounds preposterous; it  lacks  any concrete evidence to substantiate the fears about aircraft operating between distant locations being the primary culprit for the deterioration in the quality of air squandering of invaluable non-renewable resource since most of these jets fly at extremely high altitudes, between 28,000 and 40,000 feet, where they use the propellent frugally, something comparable to a personal four wheeler, so the tall claims and accusations about environmental decay being caused by these  flying machines fall flat. 

Similarly, when it comes to comparing the capacity used by both, while cars can only carry about eight people per trip, modern airliners, like Boeing 777, carry over three hundred passengers, and  that over extremely vast distances, a feat beyond the former. Additionally, none travels unnecessarily, and  tourist activity is a critical economic activity: a behemoth industry generating employment for millions and business  worth billions.       

Therefore, any suggestions made about halting dispensable flying for the good of the planet  should be completely overlooked, and long flight  should continue. The  panacea lies in discovering better and  greener technologies and  not impeding economic activities.    

Many parents (mostly women) decide to stay home and take care of the family members instead of going out for work. Some people suggest that they should be paid by the government for doing that. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.

Many parents (mostly women) decide to stay home and take care of the family members instead of going out for work. Some people suggest that they should be paid by the government for doing that. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.

Yes? Why not what 

• By one of the members leaving their jobs families become vulnerable to financial crisis - by virtue of nuclear families today, there are only two earning hands. Adopting this policy will help families make their ends meet 

• Individuals abandoning their professional dreams for the family should be acknowledged for their sacrifice 

• In a way, they are doing service to society by affording quality upbringing to their wards and taking care of the elderly 

NO? Why not  

• This would turn family relations sour and make them commercial 

• This might provoke those volunteering to ask for similar benefits 

• This is personal prerogative and why should the state be punished for this. 

• This kind of arrangement is likely to send an unwarranted signal to others who might emulate these steps and leave their jobs, posing a burden on the public exchequer 

Extending state grants to those relinquishing their professional ambitions for the sake of affording care to their families, is a suggestion evokes mixed responses, making it imperative to assess both the sides of the coin before delivering a plausible verdict.

The support for this proposal stems from the belief that forgoing the dreams of gaining prominence in occupational domain, and dedicating oneself to serving the family is worthy of being acknowledged; there is hardly anyone prepared to put their desire on the backseat just to rear their children, tend to the elderly, and surrender their financial freedom. Therefore, providing them some financial support would not only act as a consolation but also sustain their expenses.

Having said that, despite this idea looking fascinating to some, implementing it is bound to have severe/extreme ramifications for families, as well as society. Where on one hand, this could undermine the emotional bonding between the family members, which is more influenced by love, and affection, rather than being driven by monetary considerations. One chooses to renounce their progressive careers, for they are deeply concerned about the wellbeing of their little ones, and elderly family members, and adding this materialistic dimension would be an insult to devotion toward the family.

On the other hand, this policy is likely to set wrong precedents for others as they will also become inclined to emulate, and leave their jobs, reducing the numbers contributing to economic productivity, incrementing the burden on tax-payers by virtue of consuming public resources, hampering the prospect for the future development of society.

In hindsight, disputes aside, this kind of a scheme cannot be deemed acceptable owing to the challenges it is likely to pose for the community, and the individuals concerned. Therefore, I fail to concur  with this.

Introduction 1

In times when everyone is engrossed in chasing their career goals, some going against this trend, and relinquishing their professional ambitions for the sake of affording care to their families, but should they be extended state grants, is a million dollar question.

Introduction 2

As per a school of thought those relinquishing their professional ambitions for the sake of affording care to their families, should be extended state grants. Even though this suggestion seems plausible to some, it is bound to create more complications than rendering solutions.

Introduction 3

Some people believe that it is better for company decisions to be made only by managers, while others think that it is beneficial to involve employees in the decision-making process. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Some people believe that it is better for company decisions to be made only by managers, while others think that it is beneficial to involve employees in the decision-making process. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Only Managers should take decisions 

• They will make decisions from a broader perspective: departmental or even at an organizational level 

• Those at management levels carry rich exposure  and also the qualifications that afford them the ability to gain a deeper insight into various aspects of a matter 

Employees should be engaged also 

• They are better apprised about the ground reality of the working conditions and also impediments facing them in smooth operations 

• This will make workers feel acknowledged and more attached to the organization, inspiring them to devote themselves more profoundly 

As per a common perception, the task of devising plans, and future course of actions should be confined to those working on managerial positions, whereas some commentators suggest that personnel should also be a part of this exercise.

Undeniably,  those responsible for managing sections, departments, or even the whole establishments, should be vested with this task, the policies defined by them are based (founded) on a much broader perspective than ones employed at the middle, or lower rung(level), of the organizational hierarchy; they have access to information on requirements of disparate factors: human resources; financial and operational constraints, and strengths; and timelines, to name a few, making them more capable of resolving the issues, or embracing adequate strategies for seamless operations. This also helps circumvent confusion, and chaos, resulting from involving multiple layers of an entity. To corroborate, most of the large organizations such as, Delta Airlines, and so forth, with branches spread world over deploy this method  to allow faster planning, and implementation, thereby deriving efficient operational outcomes.

Nevertheless, using the intellect, opinions, and suggestions of workers engaged at operational levels, or in blue collar occupations, can help surmount challenges posed by the real issues facing them, and inform decision-makers about the ground realities of the actual functional aspects. This can facilitate a detailed insight of how resources are used in each department, inefficiencies, and hurdles impeding smooth work. Companies like Google, and various renowned hotel chains, encourage interaction with all the staff, aiding them in discovering comprehensive remedies, and defining goal-specific plans. 

In hindsight, both the arrangements have distinct rewards to offers, where the former can ensure a flawless overall functioning of the business, the latter can assist in removing bottle-necks, and finding quick solutions targeting specific operations.

Introduction 1 

Organizations run efficiently on effective decision-making, but should this process be the domain of higher management only,or should personnel be also made a part of this, is a matter that evokes mixed responses.

Introduction 2

Individual greed and selfishness have been the basis of modern society. Some people think that we must return to older, more traditional values such as respect for the elders and the local community in order to create a better world to live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people feel that the on and off the field behavior of good sportsmen and women does not matter until their performance is good. Do you agree or disagree? Write at least 250 words with relevant examples.
Do you agree or disagree? 

Professional or personal and  public conduct of outstanding players should be ignored 

Agree? Why do we agree with this  Why should their attitude should not be monitored 

1. They are also humans, and when they face so much stress to sustain their form , they are expected to lose their cool 

2. **They, with their sterling performances, bring name and fame for the country, and also present the society as being youthful and caring for its people. 

3. They encourage and inspire others, especially the youth to take up sports as a career or a way to stay healthy 

4. They are a pivotal factor of a  burgeoning industry that is generating direct and indirect employment and business for millions, besides the revenue for governments 

Disagree? Why do we disagree? 

1. These people, by virtue of being public idols have a profound influence on the attitudes of their fan following which can have a negative impact on those who follow the precedents of such celebrated people

2. Their behavior can affect the overall discipline of team which can hamper performance of others, as well as of team

3. **National image is affected adversely

Playing sports is a daunting endeavor that demands physical and mental workout that sometimes brings out extreme behaviour in the professional, social  and personal realms, and some believe that it should be overlooked if players concerned are excelling.I fail to accede to this suggestion completely, and will share plausible views in the further paragraph.

At the outset, those advocating such liberal approach propose that sports practitioners are also humans with feelings, and sometimes during the game, emotions overwhelm them due to immense pressure to perform and sustain their rhythm despite facing obstacles, which can lead to losing cool. Moreover, they encourage and inspire the youth to take sports as a career, or way to stay healthy, thereby promoting sporting culture in the nation.For example, Brazil owes its popularity of football culture to its star players, and thus affords them umpteen privleges.

  
Having said that, the view of apologists cannot be upheld since these people are public idol, and represent millions of faces in the game, and also influence the aspirations of their countrymen, and thus, unacceptable attitude - whether  practiced while playing, or in social or personal domains - would  create an unprecedented environment, and deliver a negative impact on their followers, especially youngsters, persuading them to emulate unrestricted and unwarranted conduct. Moreover, such behavior could impact the team discipline by bringing negativity that could cost them the whole game: other players would not be able to focus on the winning, bringing bad name to the sports itself. 

To conclude, even if one is excelling in their sporting discipline, their erratic behaviour should not be condoned, by virtue of them being a prominent face in sports that stimulates others to, therefore their inappropriate way of behaving cannot be tolerated.