Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

 Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and  commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 

The contemporary generation of juveniles is predisposed to pressing demands posed by their studies, the society around them and the overwhelming influence of the media in all manifestations. The source of these challenges are visible, but the panaceas os elusive. Thus, one needs to dig deeper.

The most prominent source of immense load on young minds is the need to perform at formal tuition. Constantly rising emphasis on testing has made life miserable for youngsters as they are caught between two extremes, learning and preparing for examinations, leaving them with little time for extracurricular activities. The crisis further deepens when parents also raise the bar of expectations from their wards, which many times also mirrors the social perspective. Since every parent wants their children to outperform those of their peers and social connections. 

Similarly, peer pressure and perspectives formed by engaging with electronic games television and the internet have a far reaching impact on tender minds who are required to adhere to the norms established by their mothers and fathers, and also address their own aspirations, fostered by engaging with those of their age groups and various external sources of  information. Most are found facing a dilemma. 

However, the panacea for this predicament can only be found if schools and parents make joint efforts. Where the former should reduce the frequency of the examinations, the latter should stop comparing their offspring and start seeing them as distinct individuals. Furthermore, there is also a need to make expectations more realistic besides, monitoring how young ones interact with the outer world.

In hindsight, although the situation is bemusing as youngsters face numerous uncertainties, things can be improved and life made easier for them  if parents and schools act prudently and embrace a sensitive approach towards young individuals.

In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development?

 In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development?

In this contemporary era, the internet has afforded umpteen benefits since individuals can shop online, besides engaging in professional endeavors without even visiting workplaces. I shall elucidate whether it is a favorable evolution, or not.

At the outset, an army of people vehemently professes that benefits fetched by this are overwhelming. For instance, telecommuting has allowed individuals to work flexibly from the comfort of their home, owing to this, one can now even serve in MNCs such as Microsoft, Google, and so on, without transcending political boundaries. Besides this, rather than becoming part of chaos at market places, one can shop online from a myriad of choices at their disposal.

Similarly, many are now moving to other nations for jobs since they can now maintain contact with their kith and kin through online sources. This can be corroborated by citing the outcomes of a report published by The Hindustan Times, wherein they stated that the more and more professionals migrating to alien nations for employment worry less about their families as they find it easy to stay in touch with their loved ones. 

Nonetheless, this trend has invited a plethora of challenges. While this has hampered the growth of local enterprises, various individuals are exposed to a sedentary lifestyle since they have to sit in front of a 13 inch LED during their working hours. Other than that, it has also been observed that individuals are often bereft of essential qualities like confidence and communicating skills since they hardly interact with their peers and clients in the real world.

Overall, even though rich yields are afforded by this development, it is hard to overlook the detrimental aspects of the former. Therefore, despite being a favorable phenomenon, this arrangement should be adopted discreetly.

Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar based drinks, what are the reasons and solutions for this situation? Discuss and give reasons for your answer in at least words.

 Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar based drinks, what are the reasons and solutions for this situation? Discuss and give reasons for your answer in at least words.

Aerated/ sugary/ soft / with high sugar content

It is being observed that in contemporary times, young ones are extremely fascinated  towards beverages loaded with sugar, which is harmful for their physical and mental well-being. There are various factors driving this phenomenon, which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs along with some plausible solutions.

To commence with, parents are the primary source behind this newly emerging propensity among youngsters. They regularly consume soft drinks in front of their children, and store these products in their refrigerators. They follow the footsteps of their mothers and fathers and are inspired to do the same. Several juveniles accept that they embraced cold drinks as a ritual since their elders themselves consumed these quite frequently, and brought these home too. 

Additionally, glamorized promotions techniques are adopted by companies to attract young minds. Firms hire eminent personalities, and famous characters for the advertisement to attract such audiences. When the latter see these ads on television, they are tempted to engage with such materials. Moreover, due to being laced with caffeine and added flavors, these products are very tasteful and youngsters become addicted to such taste.  

This alarming situation has made it imperative to discover potent mechanisms to combat this challenge: parents, school and the state. Families should minimize and replace high sugar content drinks with healthy and tasty homemade options such as fruit juices and shakes. The policymakers  should impose high taxes on these commodities to discourage the consumption of unhealthy  options. Schools should guide pupils about the aftereffect and prohibit them from bringing these drinks to school premises.

‘   

To conclude, the growing fondness among young individuals for sugary drinks is driven by aggressive publicity, encouragement by families and peers, but this menacing situation can be countered by adopting certain prudent measures at familial and institutional level such as prohibiting their use at homes and at school. 

Developing countries should be encouraged to implement high tariffs to grow their local industries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Developing countries should be encouraged to implement high tariffs to grow their local industries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agree. Why?

• This would provide level playing field to the local entrepreneurs who can match their output on the basis of the prices 

• This could persuade MNCs of elite regions to set up their units in poor nations by tying up with local organizations   

• This would promote business and employment, development  

Disagree, why? 

• This could problems for local manufacturers, causing the prices of the local produce to spiral 

• This could prove to be counterproductive: prosperous countries will reciprocate in the same manner    

Should impoverished nations erect protective trade barriers, using import levies, to bolster domestic businesses, is a perception that invites mixed responses, with some vouching for it, others outrightly rejecting it. Both the perspectives are supported by justified views, and thus, cannot be overlooked. 

This  policy is perceived as a formidable/powerful tool of rendering a leveled playing field to commercial enterprises and industrial units, endemic to a country, that have to otherwise struggle hard to survive the stiff competition presented by large global organisations, hailing primarily from prosperous societies, and enjoy an upper hand due to colossal financial resources, and state-of-the-art technology, available at their disposal. Therefore, such an arrangement would help native business owners by making their produce competitive. For instance, countries like Brazil have imposed heavy taxes on sports goods, brought in from the other parts of the world, to assist the local budding industries, and this system, or rather a gamble paid off well; local sports brands of this country have gained immensely in terms of local and international recognition. 

Nevertheless, despite being eulogized, deployment of this policy in absolute terms is likely to boomerang, for the other countries will behave in a similarly hostile manner, and reciprocate with equally excessive charges on goods being procured from the regions following this practice. This will offset any benefits derived as the exports can be hampered extensively, resulting in loss of foreign exchange. Likewise, local manufacturing of several products, using imported components, will become expensive, and affect the native consumers quite unfavourably by taking goods out of their reach.

In hindsight, in a highly globalized world of contemporary times, enforcing this kind of set-up will have severe ramifications, turning the future of native industrial landscape into bleak; thus this should be confined to only certain sectors.

 

Nowadays, many people, with families, leave their country to work abroad. Do you think the benefits of this trend outweigh the disadvantages for the families? Give your opinion and include any relevant examples.

Nowadays, many people, with families, leave their country to work abroad. Do you think the benefits of this trend outweigh the disadvantages for the families? Give your opinion and include any relevant examples.

Positive 

• The families can access chances to obtain better career opportunities, lifestyle, education 

• They get to experience diverse environment and develop a better perspective towards the world

 Negatives 

• Youngsters lose the touch with their family members, traditions, rituals 

• There is a sense of alienation among family members

It is commonly believed that family immigration with an intention of seeking greener pastures, can fetch umpteen benefits, but do these eclipse the challenges this process poses, is a matter that needs a critical analysis.

The exodus to  the other parts of the world, generally affluent, to realise professional ambitions, along with spouse and children, can precipitate  ease in settlement in alien surroundings by preventing  the feeling of homesickness among settlers. Where those working are spared of lonely surroundings haunting their homes, and the desire to be with their loved ones, family members also do not have to worry about the safety of those shifting to other countries. The skilled family immigration programmes hosted by countries like Canada and Australia are the true specimen that highlight the relevance of such a propensity, allowing effortless integration with the host society. 

Similarly, it becomes uncomplicated to monitor the rearing of the little ones; they can get all the attention of both the parents, together with the guidance. Moreover, this can deepen the trust and the bonding between two generations since youngsters have no one to rely upon other than their families.

Having said that, one major complication that is cited quite often from such relocation is the next generation becoming detached from their native ways of life, rituals, and extended families. Some migrant families have reported experiencing such difficulties, wherein their wards find it hard to embrace their own traditions, and communicate with their cousins. 

In hindsight, I concur with the statement that the rewards of relocating with family members to other regions of the globe, in search of work, outshine the drawbacks, and firmly believe that the latter can be overcome by engaging children in cultural activities of their home country, available in the destination society. 

 

Some say that students should concentrate only on the subjects that they like. Others suggest that they should focus on all school subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some say that students should concentrate only on the subjects that they like. Others suggest that they should focus on all school subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A school of thought professes that pupils should focus to strengthen their area of their interest to excel in academics, as well as future professional forays; however, others believe that all subjects are crucial for overall development of learners. The forthcoming paragraphs shall analyze both views exhaustively and share a plausible conclusion.

To commence with, many believe that learners feel self motivated, and passionate towards the domains that appeal to them, and readily invest time and effort enormously  studying, resulting in better outcomes. According to one survey, one can keep themselves engaged in learning something of their choice for a long time without needing any external intervention from their parents and teachers, and churn out brilliant outcomes, as compared to other subjects. Moreover, they can delve deeper and derive detailed knowledge about their favored fields, and bolster their chances of a successful career in that realm, by being able to grasp technical intricacies about the prospective occupation faster than their counterparts. 

Nevertheless, those cynical quash this proposal by asserting that the full syllabus is essential for the overall development of students; this will assist them to overcome challenges in their personal and professional life. By pursuing domains like literature, they will broaden their horizons and augment their creativity. For instance, learning languages, mathematics, history, social studies, and engaging in extracurricular activities can help them to garner analytical skills and rational decision making, and problem solving abilities, and many more that will aid them growing up as well-informed adults. 

To end the discussion, it is essential to cover the curriculum comprehensively since  growing minds need colossal sensory inputs to learn extensively and  negotiate challenges in all walks of life effectively. Thus, this suggestion of pursuing only favorite areas of study, cannot be complied with at all.   

It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

 It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Creating open air spaces such as green areas and other public domains in urban locales is mandatory, as per some. This proposal needs a deeper analysis to assess whether it is acceptable, or not. 

Open areas such as gardens and parks help urbanites in numerous ways; for instance, increasing the concentration of oxygen, and mitigating pollution caused by industries and expanding population. This could help alleviate levels of harmful toxins in the air. Besides this, these locations could also afford people a chance to exercise, improving their well being as a consequence. Additionally, these also behave as recreational areas for children, affording them  space to play in and enjoy the years of their childhood, encouraging them to engage in outdoor endeavors instead of staying indoors. Apart from that, such areas could be utilized to generate revenue by building some eye-catching figures and rides, creating opportunities for leisure.

On the other hand, a few argue with the fact of having such large lands wasted, and could be utilized in a better way, by building more houses for the increasing population of the world. They term this suggestion is sheer squandering of invaluable real estate, something that is in scarcity in cities. Implementing this arrangement will send land prices shooting through the roof, making it hard for many urban dwellers to afford living and working spaces, encouraging urban sprawl as a result, and spreading pollution and ecological disasters beyond the outskirts of the already congested urban locales. 

To conclude, even though the critics have some valid concerns, large places such as parks have their benefits and are crucial for improving the quality of city life. Therefore, I concur with this proposed policy.   

Some young people like to copy the behavior and clothes of famous people today. Why might this be the case? What problems can it cause?

Some young people like to copy the behavior and clothes of famous people today.

Why might this be the case? 

What problems can it cause?

A bizarre phenomenon appears to be surfacing, nowadays, that of-late,  numerous young minds have been emulating propensity, and dressing sense of renowned personalities. I shall ponder upon the forces behind this, and various challenges occurring owing to this.

At the outset, an army of people vehemently alleges that a myriad of factors are responsible for such an attitude. As per them, juveniles are immature, and thus, easily get lured by the luxurious lifestyle being showcased by celebrated personalities. Consequently, they tend to mimic the same. On top of that, they often get influenced by the attire worn by the famous individuals, and also desire to acquire the same since youngsters have a mindset that if they are not going to follow the former, it might make them look inferior in front of society

This can be corroborated by citing the outcomes of a survey conducted by The Forbes Magazine, wherein they stated that a prominent reason driving the inclination of youngsters following celebrities, is that they harbor a view that going with the trends reflects their social status. 

This has worried several social theorists. They fear that this practice might expose young individuals to a plethora of challenges. Renowned people often display alcoholism and unacceptable behavior on their social handles, which could have detrimental impact on tender minds. Besides this, these personalities usually spend the lion's share of their income over extravagance, which may inculcate the same behavior in young individuals as well.

To cap it all, an affluent lifestyle being portrayed by the well known personalities, laden with comfort and luxuries, acts as a force behind such conduct of young people. This could expose young minds to several addictions, along with making them habitual of becoming spendthrift.

Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages, therefore, it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages, therefore, it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the issue of whether acquiring alien linguistic skills is a squandering of precious time, or not, when software-driven translation facilities are available. I shall profoundly analyze this matter and elucidate my inclination.

An army of people vehemently lobbies behind the idea that now undertaking a language course is wasteful. As per them, this is a time consuming process since it usually takes humongous time to get a good command over a language, whereas using automated tools to transfer the text from one to the other tongue can allow one to complete the task in a few seconds.   

Besides this, this innovation affords the convenience of converting the content into multiple languages effortlessly, there is little rationale left in spending money on language courses as a feat of mastering multiple dialects is beyond imagination for humans. To corroborate the outcomes of a survey carried-out by Delhi University revealed that only a few Individuals were inclined to  learn an alien language, owing to a plethora of softwares available in the smartphones to convert audios and texts into multiple tongues. .

Nevertheless, undeniably, knowledge of foreign languages is pivotal to clear communication between cultures. Humans rely mostly on in person interaction and use of technology is bound to create a gap, due to faulty interpretations by machines: these can extend their services to the phrases and lexical resources present in their database. Thus, automated facilities can only help in casual communications and not important ones.      

In hindsight,even though by virtue of the advent of computers, for many commentators learning other languages may not be worthwhile,  it is hard to overlook that language is a human forte, and  thus can only be operated effectively by humans.  

Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend?

 

Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 

Causes for such an evolution

• Generation gap - conflicts between parents and youngsters - ones wants freedoms and others want their rules to be followed 

• Young people want to experience the world on their own now

• 
  

Benefits   

• They can experience the life on their own:

• develop a broader perspective, 

• independent personality, 

• can become well-organized

• Become better managers of their own affairs and life 

• Peace of mind 

• Non-complaining attitude

Drawbacks 

• Absence of proper counseling can make them 

• Prone to making mistakes 

• Inability to control their temperament 

• This tendency is making people unsocial and  unfit for family life

• Feel lonely since they do not have anyone to share their happiness and concerns with 

Ahmer 06-April - 2023.

In contemporary times, many want to live alone and relish their life. The following paragraphs shall discuss the drivers of this ideology and also explain that it is a favorable or a dismissive trend.

To start with, many are resorting to this lifestyle to save themselves from various conflicts that mainly stem from the gap in both the generations. Young individuals want to spend their life carefree, but on the other hand their mothers  and  fathers want to impose their thumb rule on them. Moreover, nowadays, a large section of society wants to experience the world on their own, to discover various possibilities of life, and such a way of living acts as an adventure to them.

This way of life allows one to lead their life on their terms, providing them opportunities to experience negotiating things like cooking, cleaning and many more household chores on their own. It turns them into independent personalities and they start learning how to organize things by themselves. Additionally, they start managing their monthly expenses that provide them peace of mind. Moreover, it decreases their complaining attitude regarding various things as they start taking ownership of their actions.

On the other hand, a large lobby of commenters believes that living alone can make one vulnerable to mistakes that can harm them mentally and financially. People can easily lose their temperament and feel lonely as no one is there to share their happiness and concerns. Moreover,  this kind of trend is making individuals unsocial and unfit for a family life, exposing society to severe implications.

To conclude this, living independently gives various benefits and makes an individual a better person for the society as they know their responsibilities better and can handle them without the intervention of any person.

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs.

 As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Mandates mentioning both the views (opinion in the start, or at the end)   

• Some people think the government should pay for this

• Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs.

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. 

Who should pay for sustenance and expansion of road networks: the state or the motorists. 

Motorists? Why      

• It is them who need this service. They are in the minority and a majority suffers because of them. The traffic snarls and increased carbon footprint are a result of increased number of cars 

• This will have a direct impact on number of cars, such a levy will dissuade people from buying cars 

The state? Why 

• People are paying taxes, especially care owners are being levied sales tax, road tax, pollution tax and so on

• Better roads will encourage people to travel more (and buy more cars) creating economic activity

It is true that the rising traffic density is the outcome of an increased number of cars. This makes it imperative to improve the road networks, but when it comes to funding this initiative, there ensues a debate as to who should don the mantle of this. While some suggest it should be the state, others feel it should be the motorists.

Intro 1

The rising traffic density due to cars mandates improvements in road infrastructure, but who should bear the expenditure of this initiative is a matter that invites mixed reactions. Some say that the state should bear it, while others believe that car owners should take this onus.

Intro 2

Some people say that governments should pay for improving road infrastructure to accommodate rising numbers of cars. However, the other section believes that this initiative should be handled by car owners.

Many argue that policy makers should don the mantle of improving and sustaining road infrastructure, feel that since they collect taxes in various forms from citizens such as sales tax,road tax,toll tax and pollution tax, to name a few, they should reciprocate by providing an upgraded roadways system. To corroborate, a survey carried out by the University of Toronto reveals that this demand is deemed justified by a majority of car owners as they bear various levies for maintaining cars; thus, it is their right to anticipate pliable roads, taken care of by the regime. 

However, a school of thought is in favor of making car users responsible for this expenditure. This view is based on the fact that traffic snarls and jams are the outcomes of thickening traffic, majorly due to personal four-wheelers, and these minority road users are the lone cause of inconvenience caused to the majority who either use public commute or other alternatives. Therefore, any investment made to improve the roads should be done by the former.

Similarly, this move is likely to bring an indirect benefit:people will be discouraged from buying cars because no one will be keen to pay extra money. For example, a pivot study carried out in Tokyo produced  favorable outcomes as almost 40% of buyers canceled their orders and opted for other more environmentally friendly options.

Overall, even though both the view points are carrying substance, I feel that it should be the authorities funding expansion an improvement of road framework as four-wheelers owners are already burdened by a plethora of charges.                 

Academic achievement at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Academic achievement at school or university is the only true measure of a person’s intelligence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Education plays an important role in personal development and success in life. However, I do not agree with this statement that the intelligence of a person should be judged on the basis of academic accomplishment.

Many outrightly reject this notion by quoting precedents of several  people being successful even without going to school, or dropping out midway. However, their innate skills and ability to take initiatives and  risks propelled them to triumphs, earning them fame and fortune, leaving the highly accomplished way behind. For instance,  Bill Gates and Elon Musk, to name a few. These individuals although not educated as per modern standards, they set an example in front of those highly qualified individuals. These very individuals employed the highly educated  in the establishments they are running as successful businesses.   

The fact that the level intellect being independent of any educational feats is often observed in the modern technological realms where genius programmers are found developing applications without having any formal qualification. Facebook, one of the biggest social media platforms, has evidenced this by hiring more than forty percent of people who never went to school or college, by virtue of their prodigal abilities. 

Moreover, it is well-known that a large number of students all over the world tend to cheat during their examinations to achieve higher grades and better appraisals than they are capable of. However, a genius may suffer from the anxiety just before the examinations, resulting in poor academic performance, so it will be an injustice to assume him not to be intelligent just because of the particular situation. 

In conclusion, I believe one cannot be judged on their academic exploits, and those harnessing their skill and capabilities efficiently, can earn success with the help of strong resolve and hard work.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

In contemporary times, a large population of urbanites reside in large societies housing apartments. While this arrangement offers umpteen pros,  the cons cannot be overlooked. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will discuss whether the former outshine the latter. 

To begin with, such settings have numerous benefits to offer as people from different cultures come together to celebrate the various festivals and events related to their cultures, creating harmony. The life in these gated areas becomes very easy as one receives all the facilities in the premises of the society only and also does not need to worry about the security related issues. Finding parking for the vehicle is easy unlike other areas. The one who is living in these areas never face the issues related to power cuts and water supply related troubles. 

Moreover, these places are also very cost effective: the prices and rents of the houses here are pocket-friendly. Similarly,  the cost of maintenance is also very low as it is shared among all the residents living in the building. Additionally, the environment is also very peaceful as there is no noise related to traffic and machinery.

Having said that, lack of privacy is a major drawback as every apartment is very close to each other; it is hard to organize get-togethers at home without seeking permission from neighbors. On top of that, one cannot renovate the exterior or interior of the house according to their will since if they want to do so,  they must take permission from society management and their co-habitants. 

To conclude, in my opinion accommodating in these kinds of societies has more advantages as compared to disadvantages as they provide countless facilities and they also have low maintenance.

Many people argue that restaurants should be required to disclose the nutritional information of the dishes they serve. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Many people argue that restaurants should be required to disclose the nutritional information of the dishes they serve.  Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 

Food lovers, nowadays, demand for the nutritional catalogue of the delicacies being served in restaurants. This aspect has both the benefits and drawbacks associated with it, but whether the former exceed the latter is a matter worthy of critical analysis.  

To begin with, displaying the nutritional content on the food servings will help all categories decide on the correct proportions needed from a wide variety of delicacies. The belief that the consumption of non-homemade food by pregnant women and children introduces them to serious health issues will be eliminated, by embracing this concept. Furthermore, this will enable establishments to present themselves as caring for their clientele, augmenting their business. Additionally, many food-oriented research will be conducted to provide correct proportionate weights and its nutrients; and consumers rights will be empowered to raise questions when the nutrients are not matched with quantity and price for the food.  

In contrast, such a proposal, if implemented, will stretch waiting times for serving food to customers waiting at the table, increasing their eagerness towards their order. This will also mandate hotels to recruit additional human resources with qualification and experience in various fields like, nutrition and chemical composition of food. This expenditure will be included in food bills and force consumers to pay indirectly. Moreover, such a policy can only be accomplished only by the premium hotels as other budget hotels cannot afford high investment to support this system. Such imbalance will cause economic disruption as the developing countries mostly depend on the income of mid-range hotels.

To conclude, although this analysis discovered several drawbacks of this proposal, I strongly agree with the viewpoint that pros exceed shortfalls. The suspected shortcomings can be surmounted by adopting prudent policies. 

It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

 It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

A majority believe in saving a lion’s share of their earnings rather than spending it, but there are those who deny this fact and preach consuming it. In my opinion, having reserves is important for future needs, but  nonetheless performing some expenditures is also necessary for enjoying life.

Having more in the form of savings is crucial as this can have a profound impact on the present and the future. For example, with every passing year, inflation is rising and prices are spiraling, making it imperative to create a buffer to cushion for increased cost of living later. Also, Illness is another factor that requires a huge amount of money, as medical facilities are getting expensive day by day and affording them is becoming a luxury for many. Thus, keeping aside something for the rainy day has become the need of the hour as it can render financial stability and assurance of a secure future. This practice and thought has  dominated society since ages, and people have yielded rich benefits.  

However, some are skeptical of the former approach, and profess following a lifestyle which is more relaxed, that entails spending a greater ratio than conserving money. This way of living is more concerned with enjoying life in the present and improving its quality. Such people are wedded to the thought that they have all the privilege to enjoy the exploits of their hard work. Moreover, since  the future is uncertain, there is little rationale to worry about the later years and sacrifice today for tomorrow. 

To conclude, both approaches toward life have their pros and cons, but savings is more crucial for a better and safer future than spending huge amounts on things that will bring no value and contribute towards an unstable future.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

Advantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• A closely knit community that afford opportunities for people to celebrate festivals and events together 

• Convenient life in these gated areas: all facilities are available are within close vicinity 

• No hassles for parking 

• Round the clock power back up and water 

• Unmatched security for dwellers 

• Cost-effective living since the prices and rents are relatively lower; and the cost of maintenance is shared by all

• Peaceful atmosphere 

Disadvantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• Lack of privacy 

• No alterations possible - exterior or interior - without permission 

• No access to rooftop terrace 

Nowadays, although a majority are inclined to living in large gated societies with apartments, for they profess this affords them innumerable benefits, it will be too naive to overlook the detriments such settings bring along.  

To begin with, such accommodation fetches a myriad of benefits: round the clock power and water supply,  shopping facilities, peaceful  environment, and so on. These arrangements have provisions to afford uninterrupted power through their own generation systems and have huge water reservoirs to fulfill the needs of residents. Moreover, by virtue of having outlets within the premises, it is easy to buy for their needs without leaving the safety of their housing society. 

Furthermore, one can experience a quality life in such surroundings; these settings offer services such as parks,gyms and playgrounds for children within their premises. Consequently, saving effort needed to be invested into running from pillar to post to exercise, spend leisure time, or escort little ones to distant parks to allow them to engage in physical endeavors. These factors contribute majorly towards 80% of urbanites, in cities like New York and London, preferring to choose these residential arrangements over privately owned houses. 

However, the pitfalls despite being minuscule, pester those  averse to such settings. They are more concerned about their privacy, something missing in apartments. One cannot enjoy their leisure time, organize noisy parties at their homes since they must take into account the likes and dislikes of their neighbors. Another is the absence of freedom to carry out alterations, it is a far cry to receive approvals from society managements.  

Overall, even though buying or leasing accommodation relies on budgets and choices, life in housing societies come with umpteen benefits and shortcomings; nonetheless, the former effortlessly eclipse the latter. These will prove instrumental in supporting urban living.