Some say that students should concentrate only on the subjects that they like. Others suggest that they should focus on all school subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some say that students should concentrate only on the subjects that they like. Others suggest that they should focus on all school subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A school of thought professes that pupils should focus to strengthen their area of their interest to excel in academics, as well as future professional forays; however, others believe that all subjects are crucial for overall development of learners. The forthcoming paragraphs shall analyze both views exhaustively and share a plausible conclusion.

To commence with, many believe that learners feel self motivated, and passionate towards the domains that appeal to them, and readily invest time and effort enormously  studying, resulting in better outcomes. According to one survey, one can keep themselves engaged in learning something of their choice for a long time without needing any external intervention from their parents and teachers, and churn out brilliant outcomes, as compared to other subjects. Moreover, they can delve deeper and derive detailed knowledge about their favored fields, and bolster their chances of a successful career in that realm, by being able to grasp technical intricacies about the prospective occupation faster than their counterparts. 

Nevertheless, those cynical quash this proposal by asserting that the full syllabus is essential for the overall development of students; this will assist them to overcome challenges in their personal and professional life. By pursuing domains like literature, they will broaden their horizons and augment their creativity. For instance, learning languages, mathematics, history, social studies, and engaging in extracurricular activities can help them to garner analytical skills and rational decision making, and problem solving abilities, and many more that will aid them growing up as well-informed adults. 

To end the discussion, it is essential to cover the curriculum comprehensively since  growing minds need colossal sensory inputs to learn extensively and  negotiate challenges in all walks of life effectively. Thus, this suggestion of pursuing only favorite areas of study, cannot be complied with at all.   

It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

 It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Creating open air spaces such as green areas and other public domains in urban locales is mandatory, as per some. This proposal needs a deeper analysis to assess whether it is acceptable, or not. 

Open areas such as gardens and parks help urbanites in numerous ways; for instance, increasing the concentration of oxygen, and mitigating pollution caused by industries and expanding population. This could help alleviate levels of harmful toxins in the air. Besides this, these locations could also afford people a chance to exercise, improving their well being as a consequence. Additionally, these also behave as recreational areas for children, affording them  space to play in and enjoy the years of their childhood, encouraging them to engage in outdoor endeavors instead of staying indoors. Apart from that, such areas could be utilized to generate revenue by building some eye-catching figures and rides, creating opportunities for leisure.

On the other hand, a few argue with the fact of having such large lands wasted, and could be utilized in a better way, by building more houses for the increasing population of the world. They term this suggestion is sheer squandering of invaluable real estate, something that is in scarcity in cities. Implementing this arrangement will send land prices shooting through the roof, making it hard for many urban dwellers to afford living and working spaces, encouraging urban sprawl as a result, and spreading pollution and ecological disasters beyond the outskirts of the already congested urban locales. 

To conclude, even though the critics have some valid concerns, large places such as parks have their benefits and are crucial for improving the quality of city life. Therefore, I concur with this proposed policy.   

Some young people like to copy the behavior and clothes of famous people today. Why might this be the case? What problems can it cause?

Some young people like to copy the behavior and clothes of famous people today.

Why might this be the case? 

What problems can it cause?

A bizarre phenomenon appears to be surfacing, nowadays, that of-late,  numerous young minds have been emulating propensity, and dressing sense of renowned personalities. I shall ponder upon the forces behind this, and various challenges occurring owing to this.

At the outset, an army of people vehemently alleges that a myriad of factors are responsible for such an attitude. As per them, juveniles are immature, and thus, easily get lured by the luxurious lifestyle being showcased by celebrated personalities. Consequently, they tend to mimic the same. On top of that, they often get influenced by the attire worn by the famous individuals, and also desire to acquire the same since youngsters have a mindset that if they are not going to follow the former, it might make them look inferior in front of society

This can be corroborated by citing the outcomes of a survey conducted by The Forbes Magazine, wherein they stated that a prominent reason driving the inclination of youngsters following celebrities, is that they harbor a view that going with the trends reflects their social status. 

This has worried several social theorists. They fear that this practice might expose young individuals to a plethora of challenges. Renowned people often display alcoholism and unacceptable behavior on their social handles, which could have detrimental impact on tender minds. Besides this, these personalities usually spend the lion's share of their income over extravagance, which may inculcate the same behavior in young individuals as well.

To cap it all, an affluent lifestyle being portrayed by the well known personalities, laden with comfort and luxuries, acts as a force behind such conduct of young people. This could expose young minds to several addictions, along with making them habitual of becoming spendthrift.

Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages, therefore, it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages, therefore, it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The great public discourse of contemporary times is aligned with the issue of whether acquiring alien linguistic skills is a squandering of precious time, or not, when software-driven translation facilities are available. I shall profoundly analyze this matter and elucidate my inclination.

An army of people vehemently lobbies behind the idea that now undertaking a language course is wasteful. As per them, this is a time consuming process since it usually takes humongous time to get a good command over a language, whereas using automated tools to transfer the text from one to the other tongue can allow one to complete the task in a few seconds.   

Besides this, this innovation affords the convenience of converting the content into multiple languages effortlessly, there is little rationale left in spending money on language courses as a feat of mastering multiple dialects is beyond imagination for humans. To corroborate the outcomes of a survey carried-out by Delhi University revealed that only a few Individuals were inclined to  learn an alien language, owing to a plethora of softwares available in the smartphones to convert audios and texts into multiple tongues. .

Nevertheless, undeniably, knowledge of foreign languages is pivotal to clear communication between cultures. Humans rely mostly on in person interaction and use of technology is bound to create a gap, due to faulty interpretations by machines: these can extend their services to the phrases and lexical resources present in their database. Thus, automated facilities can only help in casual communications and not important ones.      

In hindsight,even though by virtue of the advent of computers, for many commentators learning other languages may not be worthwhile,  it is hard to overlook that language is a human forte, and  thus can only be operated effectively by humans.  

Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend?

 

Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 

Causes for such an evolution

• Generation gap - conflicts between parents and youngsters - ones wants freedoms and others want their rules to be followed 

• Young people want to experience the world on their own now

• 
  

Benefits   

• They can experience the life on their own:

• develop a broader perspective, 

• independent personality, 

• can become well-organized

• Become better managers of their own affairs and life 

• Peace of mind 

• Non-complaining attitude

Drawbacks 

• Absence of proper counseling can make them 

• Prone to making mistakes 

• Inability to control their temperament 

• This tendency is making people unsocial and  unfit for family life

• Feel lonely since they do not have anyone to share their happiness and concerns with 

Ahmer 06-April - 2023.

In contemporary times, many want to live alone and relish their life. The following paragraphs shall discuss the drivers of this ideology and also explain that it is a favorable or a dismissive trend.

To start with, many are resorting to this lifestyle to save themselves from various conflicts that mainly stem from the gap in both the generations. Young individuals want to spend their life carefree, but on the other hand their mothers  and  fathers want to impose their thumb rule on them. Moreover, nowadays, a large section of society wants to experience the world on their own, to discover various possibilities of life, and such a way of living acts as an adventure to them.

This way of life allows one to lead their life on their terms, providing them opportunities to experience negotiating things like cooking, cleaning and many more household chores on their own. It turns them into independent personalities and they start learning how to organize things by themselves. Additionally, they start managing their monthly expenses that provide them peace of mind. Moreover, it decreases their complaining attitude regarding various things as they start taking ownership of their actions.

On the other hand, a large lobby of commenters believes that living alone can make one vulnerable to mistakes that can harm them mentally and financially. People can easily lose their temperament and feel lonely as no one is there to share their happiness and concerns. Moreover,  this kind of trend is making individuals unsocial and unfit for a family life, exposing society to severe implications.

To conclude this, living independently gives various benefits and makes an individual a better person for the society as they know their responsibilities better and can handle them without the intervention of any person.

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs.

 As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Mandates mentioning both the views (opinion in the start, or at the end)   

• Some people think the government should pay for this

• Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs.

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. 

Who should pay for sustenance and expansion of road networks: the state or the motorists. 

Motorists? Why      

• It is them who need this service. They are in the minority and a majority suffers because of them. The traffic snarls and increased carbon footprint are a result of increased number of cars 

• This will have a direct impact on number of cars, such a levy will dissuade people from buying cars 

The state? Why 

• People are paying taxes, especially care owners are being levied sales tax, road tax, pollution tax and so on

• Better roads will encourage people to travel more (and buy more cars) creating economic activity

It is true that the rising traffic density is the outcome of an increased number of cars. This makes it imperative to improve the road networks, but when it comes to funding this initiative, there ensues a debate as to who should don the mantle of this. While some suggest it should be the state, others feel it should be the motorists.

Intro 1

The rising traffic density due to cars mandates improvements in road infrastructure, but who should bear the expenditure of this initiative is a matter that invites mixed reactions. Some say that the state should bear it, while others believe that car owners should take this onus.

Intro 2

Some people say that governments should pay for improving road infrastructure to accommodate rising numbers of cars. However, the other section believes that this initiative should be handled by car owners.

Many argue that policy makers should don the mantle of improving and sustaining road infrastructure, feel that since they collect taxes in various forms from citizens such as sales tax,road tax,toll tax and pollution tax, to name a few, they should reciprocate by providing an upgraded roadways system. To corroborate, a survey carried out by the University of Toronto reveals that this demand is deemed justified by a majority of car owners as they bear various levies for maintaining cars; thus, it is their right to anticipate pliable roads, taken care of by the regime. 

However, a school of thought is in favor of making car users responsible for this expenditure. This view is based on the fact that traffic snarls and jams are the outcomes of thickening traffic, majorly due to personal four-wheelers, and these minority road users are the lone cause of inconvenience caused to the majority who either use public commute or other alternatives. Therefore, any investment made to improve the roads should be done by the former.

Similarly, this move is likely to bring an indirect benefit:people will be discouraged from buying cars because no one will be keen to pay extra money. For example, a pivot study carried out in Tokyo produced  favorable outcomes as almost 40% of buyers canceled their orders and opted for other more environmentally friendly options.

Overall, even though both the view points are carrying substance, I feel that it should be the authorities funding expansion an improvement of road framework as four-wheelers owners are already burdened by a plethora of charges.                 

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

In contemporary times, a large population of urbanites reside in large societies housing apartments. While this arrangement offers umpteen pros,  the cons cannot be overlooked. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will discuss whether the former outshine the latter. 

To begin with, such settings have numerous benefits to offer as people from different cultures come together to celebrate the various festivals and events related to their cultures, creating harmony. The life in these gated areas becomes very easy as one receives all the facilities in the premises of the society only and also does not need to worry about the security related issues. Finding parking for the vehicle is easy unlike other areas. The one who is living in these areas never face the issues related to power cuts and water supply related troubles. 

Moreover, these places are also very cost effective: the prices and rents of the houses here are pocket-friendly. Similarly,  the cost of maintenance is also very low as it is shared among all the residents living in the building. Additionally, the environment is also very peaceful as there is no noise related to traffic and machinery.

Having said that, lack of privacy is a major drawback as every apartment is very close to each other; it is hard to organize get-togethers at home without seeking permission from neighbors. On top of that, one cannot renovate the exterior or interior of the house according to their will since if they want to do so,  they must take permission from society management and their co-habitants. 

To conclude, in my opinion accommodating in these kinds of societies has more advantages as compared to disadvantages as they provide countless facilities and they also have low maintenance.

It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

 It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

A majority believe in saving a lion’s share of their earnings rather than spending it, but there are those who deny this fact and preach consuming it. In my opinion, having reserves is important for future needs, but  nonetheless performing some expenditures is also necessary for enjoying life.

Having more in the form of savings is crucial as this can have a profound impact on the present and the future. For example, with every passing year, inflation is rising and prices are spiraling, making it imperative to create a buffer to cushion for increased cost of living later. Also, Illness is another factor that requires a huge amount of money, as medical facilities are getting expensive day by day and affording them is becoming a luxury for many. Thus, keeping aside something for the rainy day has become the need of the hour as it can render financial stability and assurance of a secure future. This practice and thought has  dominated society since ages, and people have yielded rich benefits.  

However, some are skeptical of the former approach, and profess following a lifestyle which is more relaxed, that entails spending a greater ratio than conserving money. This way of living is more concerned with enjoying life in the present and improving its quality. Such people are wedded to the thought that they have all the privilege to enjoy the exploits of their hard work. Moreover, since  the future is uncertain, there is little rationale to worry about the later years and sacrifice today for tomorrow. 

To conclude, both approaches toward life have their pros and cons, but savings is more crucial for a better and safer future than spending huge amounts on things that will bring no value and contribute towards an unstable future.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

Advantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• A closely knit community that afford opportunities for people to celebrate festivals and events together 

• Convenient life in these gated areas: all facilities are available are within close vicinity 

• No hassles for parking 

• Round the clock power back up and water 

• Unmatched security for dwellers 

• Cost-effective living since the prices and rents are relatively lower; and the cost of maintenance is shared by all

• Peaceful atmosphere 

Disadvantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• Lack of privacy 

• No alterations possible - exterior or interior - without permission 

• No access to rooftop terrace 

Nowadays, although a majority are inclined to living in large gated societies with apartments, for they profess this affords them innumerable benefits, it will be too naive to overlook the detriments such settings bring along.  

To begin with, such accommodation fetches a myriad of benefits: round the clock power and water supply,  shopping facilities, peaceful  environment, and so on. These arrangements have provisions to afford uninterrupted power through their own generation systems and have huge water reservoirs to fulfill the needs of residents. Moreover, by virtue of having outlets within the premises, it is easy to buy for their needs without leaving the safety of their housing society. 

Furthermore, one can experience a quality life in such surroundings; these settings offer services such as parks,gyms and playgrounds for children within their premises. Consequently, saving effort needed to be invested into running from pillar to post to exercise, spend leisure time, or escort little ones to distant parks to allow them to engage in physical endeavors. These factors contribute majorly towards 80% of urbanites, in cities like New York and London, preferring to choose these residential arrangements over privately owned houses. 

However, the pitfalls despite being minuscule, pester those  averse to such settings. They are more concerned about their privacy, something missing in apartments. One cannot enjoy their leisure time, organize noisy parties at their homes since they must take into account the likes and dislikes of their neighbors. Another is the absence of freedom to carry out alterations, it is a far cry to receive approvals from society managements.  

Overall, even though buying or leasing accommodation relies on budgets and choices, life in housing societies come with umpteen benefits and shortcomings; nonetheless, the former effortlessly eclipse the latter. These will prove instrumental in supporting urban living.   

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Can bridging the gap between the elite and the impoverished, as has been suggested by many, work, is a controversial topic. I intend to critically analyze this proposal before drawing a plausible conclusion. 

To begin with, narrowing the income gap can address many root causes of the current pessimistic social environment. When wealth is evenly distributed, it will allow everyone access to essential amenities,  such as healthcare, food, education, and housing, regardless of socioeconomic backgrounds, leading to empowering individuals, rendering them an improved quality of life, and ultimately,  fostering an environment of optimism. Additionally, resulting in reduced societal tensions. Moreover, this will create a form of equality between the income distribution and an individual will not be judged upon their financial conditions. Such economic stability will result in a general sense of well-being and optimism.

However, economic equality alone does not automatically lead to social bonhomie. Other factors, such as cultural values, social networks and personal freedom play a crucial role in determining overall cheerfulness. A truly harmonious society is built not just by financial parity, but a sense of shared responsibility, motivation and individual drive to contribute meaningfully. Additionally, this is a way of pampering those who circumvented working hard, and have not achieved anything in their life. This kind of policy would only help create a class of complacent individuals who will incessantly depend on such support, harming the future of society, and country, as well.  

In conclusion, blurring income gaps can contribute to societal happiness, but it must be a part of broader policy that includes addressing other factors, rather than simply redistributing wealth. A thriving society should encourage both economic productivity and personal growth, ensuring individuals feel valued and are motivated to contribute.

Social media has both advantage and disadvantages for different segments of society

 Social media has both advantage and disadvantages for different segments of society. Discuss and give your opinion in not less than 250 words.

Undeniably, social media offers umpteen benefits to disparate sections of society, but the drawbacks associated with it cannot be overlooked. This essay intends to critically analyze both the aspects and derive a plausible conclusion.

Social  media platforms have helped students, teachers  and other working professionals connect with their counterparts within the same region or across the globe, enabling them to share and exchange views, knowledge, find quick solutions, and broaden their horizons on any given topic. To corroborate, educational institutes and companies utilize applications like X , Linkedin, Instagram, Facebook and academic forums to collaborate and research, sharing innovative ideas and enhancing learner experiences. 

Moreover, the virtual social interaction networks have empowered even the marginalized sections that can now voice their opinions, exhibit their concerns, access services extended by regimes, and advocate for their rights, with the help of online groups belonging to their own communities. For instance, since the inception of social media platforms over a decade ago, significant populations of the destitute in regions like Asia, Africa, and Latin America have found a voice. The internet-based activism has played a crucial role in pressuring governments to take action and implement policies aimed at alleviating the suffering of their impoverished citizens.

On the contrary, despite proving to be extremely beneficial, this innovation  has also raised concerns about users being prone to misinformation, stalking and bullying. To exemplify, there have been many reports stating that individuals have started developing ill-feelings for other communities after falling prey to rumours, promoted on social platforms.

In hindsight, although there are certain challenges that these platforms present: misinformation, their benefits in fostering global connectivity, knowledge sharing, and social empowerment dominate. With responsible usage and proper regulations, this virtual medium can act as a transformative force for individuals and societies worldwide.

Some parents think that helping their children with homework is good. Others think children should do their homework on their own. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some parents think that helping their children with homework is good. Others think children should do their homework on their own. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some believe that affording support to youngsters with their assignments rendered by schools fosters academic success, while others vouch for independent effort cultivating crucial life skills. Both perspectives present valid arguments, and need to be delved deeper into. 

Advocates of parental assistance highlight the benefit of guidance during complex tasks. Mothers and fathers often possess the experience and knowledge to clarify difficult concepts, making learning more efficient and helping young ones manage their time. For instance, lending a hand in mathematics and science projects can ensure accuracy and deepen understanding of young minds since they can communicate their concerns and weaknesses effortlessly in an informal environment. Additionally, this involvement strengthens the family connections, as joint effort can create opportunities for communication and bonding. Youngsters may also feel more confident tackling assignments, preparing time tables which ultimately, help appreciating the fact that their parents have invested in and contributed to their academic progress.

Nevertheless,  those lobbying for personal engagement of youngsters in negotiating tasks extended by schools, assert that familial help can hinder self resilience and critical thinking. When young minds rely on constant assistance, they may struggle to develop problem solving abilities and time management skills. For example, completing an essay independently teaches youngsters  to organize thoughts and articulate ideas. Allowing them to face challenges fosters perseverance, preparing them for future responsibilities. Furthermore, some might inadvertently provide solutions, undermining the educational process and leading to children circumventing exploration on their own. 

In conclusion, both viewpoints emphasize important aspects of learning. While parental help with homework can be valuable in specific situations, cultivating independence remains essential for the development of tender minds. Striking a balance between guidance and self initiative ensures that children grow into capable, confident individuals equipped to face future challenges.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

The contemporary urban landscape has radically evolved to predominantly towering apartment blocks that house a significant portion of the population. This shift towards vertical living has prompted discussions about the merits and drawbacks of this arrangement that shall be compared in the following paragraphs.  

With city spaces becoming extremely limited and urban populations swelling,  residing in large apartment complexes has  become a vogue due to several causes. This discussion delves into the multifaceted nature of this living arrangement, exploring the myriad benefits it offers, and the potential drawbacks that one might encounter. 

Such residential settings permit efficient use of urban space, accommodating a colossal number of people within a smaller area,  bringing down the cost and rents of housing units, making surviving in cities affordable. Also, since the maintenance is taken care of by the management and is shared, one is not needed to pay out of their nose, causing the cost of leaving to plummet.

Moreover, amenities such as gyms, swimming pools, common areas, and even rooftop gardens, which may be expensive or impractical to have in single-family homes are easily accessible. Similarly, owing to their location within the close vicinity of urban centers, these locations afford easy access to workplaces, entertainment, shopping, and public transportation. Above all, one cannot deny that enhanced security measures like controlled access, surveillance cameras, and doormen, extend an unmatched sense of safety, especially for children, engendering a carefree environment. 

Nevertheless, it will be too naive to overlook the downsides of such an arrangement. It is hard for large families to accommodate comfortably; and shared walls with others robs one of privacy, exposing them to noise from the neighborhood. Additionally, restrictions on the renovation and personalizing decor for the facade is out of bounds, turning the outlook of homes monotonous. 

Overall, even though it is always a personal preference of each individual to choose the space for their living according to their budget and aspirations, apartments fetch unrivaled upsides that eclipse the pitfalls. This system holds promises that will bolster urban sprawl. 

 

Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play at home and play Until they are six or seven years old. others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play at home and play Until they are six or seven years old. others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible.  Discuss both views and give your opinion.

An army of people have started professing that young ones should start schooling once they attain the age of six or seven, while others dissent and want this phase to begin as soon as possible. Following paragraphs will delve deeper on both the view points and share the opinion.

To begin with, youngsters under the age seven have a curious mind to absorb the learning being taught in the school without any hesitation, and assimilate easily with the school environment, ideally preparing them for the future schooling days faster. Discipline injected before aforementioned age can lay the foundation for successful schooling, and their brains can be trained easily to avoid diversion and concentrate only on the educational endeavors. For instance, once the child has practiced completing the assignments provided at the school within the given deadline, in their inquisitive stage,  will always comply with deadlines in the future, a paramount expectation from all learners. 

In contrast, juveniles less than the age six or seven have just started experiencing their surroundings and need time to comprehend the family atmosphere that will teach them about feelings, respecting elders and other non-academic learnings. Moreover, little ones, before turning 6, are unable to communicate the basic requirements like food, water and biological necessities while exposing them to strangers that can heighten the risk of health issues. 

Similarly, balanced nutrition is a critical factor to avoid issues related to both physical and mental well being, which can be ensured by mothers and fathers. Additionally, many developed nations like Japan, have started adopting this practice based on the study that early schooling exacerbates stress levels affecting retention power at the later stage of life.

Overall, even though sending youngsters to formal tuition may fetch certain benefits,  it is likely to bring in more drawbacks as little ones might feel alienated and also be unable to  interact with their new surroundings effectively.  Thus, they should commence schooling only after once they grow up to be at least six. 

The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this tech-savvy world, a group of people propound that young minds are best decision makers and more suitable for managerial roles; however, others believe experienced supervisors are more proficient for such tasks. This essay shall delve deeper into this matter and draw a plausible conclusion.

Many believe young adults are broad-minded, energetic, tech savvy and quick decision makers. They can effortlessly set precedents for their subordinates, and are open to feedback from their juniors. Similarly, by virtue of being educated in an environment influenced by modern concepts and technology, they can engage modern methods and technology for making quick decisions and ensuring well-being of working staff. To corroborate a survey by Times that reveals that a majority of personnel are comfortable working under young individuals; they experience better workplace culture, and their suggestions are welcomed by top management.  

Nevertheless, some  argue that leadership qualities can only be augmented with seasoning: those who have been through the thick and thin can plan and manage effectively. Old executives are well-organized and possess expertise in their subject matter, which is a boon for both organization and human resources. Moreover, they have a pragmatic vision and their accomplishments help them make accurate predictions. Workers supervised by them feel assured, inquisitive and gain valuable experience from by operating under their aegis. According to one study, organizations facing operational challenges prefer to hire personnel in their forties or fifties, in principal roles as their involvement can be beneficial for the growth of business and staff. 

Overall, I partially concur with this notion, for where the business needs to embrace modern technology like IT, those in their young age can effectively lead from the front, but when it comes to strategic forays, older workers are more suitable for governance.   

People’s behaviour varies from country to country. When traveling to a different country, people should copy the behaviour and habits of the inhabitants of the country they visit. Do you agree or disagree?

 People’s behaviour varies from country to country. When traveling to a different country, people should copy the behaviour and habits of the inhabitants of the country they visit. Do you agree or disagree?

Yes 

• To be accepted by locals more closely “When in Rome, do as Roman do”, rendering them a chance to look at the host ways of life more closely 

• THis can also prevent them from offending local aspirations 

• Protection from becoming victims of crimes 

No 

• Against the globalized  ethos: those visiting are there to experience diversity and not abandon their own beliefs.   

• Harboring hostile attitudes may hamper the reputation of the country and keep visitors away: affecting the tourism badly, and earnings in foreign exchange 

• Affecting the relationships between societies 

Many suggest that those undertaking journeys to diverse regions of the globe must embrace the ways of the life of the host society. This proposal is quite prudent, and promises rich experiences to those visiting alien surroundings 

To begin with, making adjustments in the attitude to complement the native lifestyles of the destination can help  visitors prevent themselves from becoming the subject of wrath(anger) of the locals, and instead being accepted more readily by the latter; they feel that their customs have been acknowledged. This can precipitate(result in creating ) a conducive environment, wherein one can explore differences and also uniqueness of the culture being visited, and create nostalgic memories, thereby fulfilling the fundamental purpose of travelling. Several travelogues written by avid backpackers (keen travellers ) clearly highlight the relevance of this aspects as most were well-received by people of countries they went to simply because they followed local traditions and even etiquettes.

On top of that, following this strategy can be of great avail to the ones visiting other parts of the world by virtue of safeguarding them from criminal activities and unwarranted situations. It has been often observed that foreign travellers tend to become easy victims of petty crimes, or overcharging.  However, familiarising oneself with ways endemic to the destination nation such as wearing the local attire, learning and using the local dialect, and so forth, allows mingling with natives effortlessly, and being treated equally. A growing number report that when they behaved the same way, a national would do, illegal elements stayed away and the shopkeepers treated them with respect and with equality.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that when in Rome, do as Romans do,so that one can enjoy their travel, experience the customs and traditions of host societies more closely.

Intro 1:- In times, when more and more are undertaking journeys to diverse regions of the globe their conduct has come under a critical scanner, and many suggest that they should embrace the ways of life of the host society. Although some challenge this practice, I believe that this is the most prudent way of experiencing an alien surrounding. Intro 2 :- Of late, a suggestion has surfaced that those undertaking journeys to diverse regions of the globe must embrace the ways of life of the host society.I concur with this proposal, and shall elucidate reasons to validate(support/bolster/augment) my stand/stance in the following paragraphs. Intro 3:-