Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Others believe that it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Choosing a friend is an onerous task. Many voice their belief that one should select an acquaintance who has similar beliefs and preferences; however, others say that it is good to have someone who could voice disagreement occasionally. This essay will discuss both the sides and share a justified opinion.
To start with, friendship among people with similar mindsets bloom often. In other words, people are able to understand each other in every sphere of life, which results in absence of disputes and people engage in a healthy relationship that goes a long way. For example, a recent survey conducted by a group of social behaviorists shows that people who have friends with the same principals have a hospitable and an enjoyable relationship and are most likely to stay in it forever.
Nevertheless, a lobby holds contrasting views on this issue. They vouch for friends who have guts and grit to dissent. It is believed that having such individuals, instead of yes-men, often helps ensure choosing a viable path and preventing one from committing errors. This is to say that, if one is about to take a wrong decision, a friend with the courage to be critical can show a correct path, which could reduce many hurdles. Moreover, when friends have disparate perspectives, they do not only get to enjoy a variety of ideas but also obtain a chance to broaden the horizons. There are many things that one does not know, and lending ears to someone with contrasting views will help to increase knowledge.
In conclusion, considering the aforementioned views, in my
opinion, friends with different opinions are always a blessing in disguise as
they could show one the right path or assist in expanding the knowledge.
