Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience.
There is an intriguing debate brewing up since there is a lobby that believes construction of new tourist attractions would be of great afford rather than revamping the existing heritage sites. This essay will justify the rationale behind this notion and explore whether this is favourable or unfavourable development.
A slew of people takes inspiration and ideas from these historical structures about their architecture, diverse art-forms, calligraphy styles, thereby stimulating creativity and imagination among masses. If these places get replaced by modern forms, people will end up losing the significant knowhow about conventional craftsmanship. Furthermore, these sites serve as an heirloom to the future generations by rendering individuals opportunities to explore their history and getting to know numerous cultural and traditional values which are associated with them.
On top of that, these places happen to be major tourist attractions which lure millions of alien visitors to come and experience nostalgia associated with a city and society, which also helps generate huge revenues. If these structures are razed to the ground to give way to modern ones, the past and the value of the place will be lost forever.
However, since heritage buildings are stretched over a large area, they require a great deal of maintenance and abundance of energy to keep them illuminated owing to which the idea of refurbishing has earned support from various quarters. It is felt, it would be better to replace these structures with more energy-efficient ones, which would help in saving public funds, and the land freed from such occupation could be allocated to other indispensable purposes.
To reiterate, despite the garnered support for building new structures, the notion of revamping these historical sites prevail and outshine its drawbacks. Hence, I do not concur with the statement.
