Some people think that schools
should select students according to their academic abilities, while others
believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying
together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
In order
to make learning more meaningful, many
educationalists have started proposing
creating a bifurcation among the fast and slow learners in their formative
years. This has initiated a profound
debate since many out rightly reject the former view.
Moreover,
tutors will be spared of flak from students with the latter blaming them for harboring partisan attitude towards bright
or dull pupils. Admittedly, in mixed
ability classes, the progress often relies on collective outcomes, quite
unwelcoming for those quick at grasping content. They complain of teachers
deliberately slowing down the process to aid academically weaker. Same is true
of the slow learners who often feel alienated with teachers involving brighter
pupils in discussions.
Nevertheless, critics of such settings assert that adopting
this kind of practice will mean defeating the very purpose of education and
promoting a permanent wedge between the learners quite early on which may
become insurmountable later. The fundamental principle of formal tuition is
promoting equality along with instilling wisdom and not training young minds to
harbor ill-feelings for each other.
Hence,
it can be said that harboring such discriminatory system will do more harm than
good. In order to bolster excellence, basic tenets of education should not be
abandoned, so I detest the arrangement of segregation and selective enrollment
of pupils.