The increase in people's life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement. One alternative is that people start to work at a younger age. Is this alternative a positive or negative development?
Many commentators have come up with a proposal that one should take up employment quite early on to bolster their extended twilight years financially. This suggestion has fetched both brickbats and accolades due to it having benefits and drawbacks.
Nevertheless, there is a cynical view of the former opinion
that considers it to be quite naive. In reality, joining a profession is likely
to expose one to a condition where they may have to abandon their education midway
and forgo any opportunities of academic advancements and career progression.
This will undoubtedly tie them permanently to low-paying jobs, reducing their
chances of earning anything more than making their both ends meet. To
exemplify, several studies corroborate this fact; those taking up work early
are unable to enhance their skills, rise professionally and save enough money
for their autumn years and remain dependent on government grants.
Overall, despite optimism being expressed about this supposition, it is pitted with umpteen pitfalls in reality. Therefore, it can be said such
an arrangement will do more harm than good.