Establishment of superstores has resulted in closure of small shops. Is it a positive or negative development?
An intriguing debate is brewing up since a lobby believes that replacement of small retail stores with supermarkets is a positive trend while the opponents to this thought assert that is a detrimental evolution.
The superstores render individuals a rich profusion of benefits. People can find a wide array of things under one roof, they are not required to visit several shops available at distance apart. By virtue of this, people benefit in the form of saving a precious commodity that is the time, which can be utilised further for other commitments.
Furthermore, supermarkets render good quality goods within an economical price range. These establishments procure merchandise in huge quantities that also mostly directly from buyers, which automatically results in reduced costs of purchase. The benefit of these savings is extended to the shoppers. Moreover, these places offer a great option of home delivery with no extra charges, which is the cherry on the cake situation for the shoppers engrossed in their hectic schedules.
However, the commodities in superstores are arranged in an organised manner which catches the attention of consumers immediately, compels them to buy more than what they need, thereby pushing them into a financial crisis. Moreover, unlike small shops, supermarkets render things in the customised packets according to the quantity required, which many times leads to the wastage because of people buying excessive amounts. Additionally, absence of small retail outlets has weakened the sense of community since most of these stores used to act as meeting points for the residents.
To reiterate, I strongly feel that despite some negative aspects, development of supermarkets is accompanied by numerous positive aspects which prevail over the unfavorable outcomes: these establishments have benefited buyers in multiple ways.
