A government’s role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure (road, water supplies…). All other services (education, health, social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social welfare and delivery of
governance has always been a top priority of any democratic set-up, but for
some, embracing all areas concerned with welfare of the inhabitants is a daunting task. They feel, creating a bifurcation in the jobs would help, like
the state handling defense, infrastructure and utilities, and
inviting private participation in other areas.
Governments should be primarily
concerned with the issues of greater relevance, but that does not accrue
financial returns, like: ensuring external and internal security; developing
infrastructure, rendering utilities, etc. Handing over rest of the
responsibilities to the private players and community would help the states to
streamline their establishments and workforce, and focus on more critical
areas.
Such an action would also help in curtailing
pilferage and misuse of funds, collected from taxpayers. Since private
organizations are guided by an urge to earn profits, it would help ensure an
optimal use of funds, and consistent introduction of innovation at various
levels of functions in these areas.
However, government is an elected body,
which has been given a mandate by the people, who also pay taxes, to take care
of various aspects of social life, including welfare. Eliminating or
transferring some of the responsibilities to private sector might result in economically
weaker sections being further arginalized. It would hard for the state to address basic issues at the grass root level, as the poor may be
stripped of the benefits being extended to them. This would surely have dire
consequences in long run, and this might affect the overall development of a
country.
Overall, I personally feel that
idea of handing over essential services to the private sectors is full of
flaws, and could pose seirous challenges for the destitute sections. Thus, such a policy must be implemented with caution.