Some teachers think that a program of international exchange visits would benefit all teenage school students. Do you think the benefits of such a program would outweigh any disadvantages?
Formal tuition is introducing innovative ways to develop and improve the quality of knowledge imparted and one such step involves tie-ups with their counterparts across the world facilitating international school exchange initiatives. This essay shall elucidate the pros and cons of this system.
To embark upon discussion, there is a lobby that strongly vouches for this arrangement as it paves way for umpteen merits: the learners get an opportunity to comprehend the world beyond their socio-political boundaries and develop a global perspective, broadening their horizons as a result, helping them forge relationships with learners hailing from disparate cultures. This can go a long way in preparing young minds to appreciate diversity and brush aside their tribal attitudes, a pivotal parameter for survival in a highly globalized world. It is firmly perceived that such programs can help establish a society that will learn to live in harmony, regardless of being populated with distinct aspirations.
Having said that, some are skeptical of such a policy, albiet their views not being well-founded. There are concerns about the exorbitant expenses being incurred when learners from a country travel to another, the burden of which must be borne by parents, often exposing them to unwarranted financial burden. Some also express fears that by virtue of being easily influenced pupils in their teens might not be able to readjust back into their routines after returning back to their home countries. This can have a profound impact on their academic performance.
To cap it all, controversies aside, even though there are some alleged pitfalls of such exchange endeavors, the favors fetched are far more than the former. Therefore, it can be safely asserted that the latter outshine the former by miles, and thus, must be promoted.
